tv Bloomberg Business Week Bloomberg June 16, 2019 9:00am-10:00am EDT
♪ taylor: welcome to "bloomberg businessweek." i am taylor riggs inside the magazine's headquarters in new york. in this week's issue, a surprising fallout from the trade war. the u.s. is purging chinese scientists in a new red scare. plus, bringing g.e. back from the brink. first, here is joel weber for a look inside the issue.
i wanted to start with comcast. it is another story in the features section. what i loved about it is that it is kind of an old, stodgy media company that is transforming to the next generation. joel: this is a fun one. the son of the ceo, tucker roberts, is the guy leading the company's foray into e-sports. they are doing it in philadelphia, where the company has its roots, and they have even built a single-use stadium for e-sports which is a crazy way you can really double down and try and make a big bet. but the question is, will it work? david: another question has to be g.e. betting on a new ceo. market cap has been falling, what is the update on g.e.? joel: this is the most iconic american company, and it has hit every rung on the way down when last year it even fell out of the dow. the ceo came out of retirement to try to save the company. and it is really a question of,
can he do it? it is the ultimate ceo test. the jury is still out. that is what we dug into. taylor: another story that is this week's cover was interesting because when we talk about the trade fight, it is usually about technology or ip theft. but this one is about the medical sector. joel: md anderson, the place for cutting-edge cancer research. one of the things that has happened is chinese researchers there, some of whom are u.s. citizens, have actually been purged out of the country. in this ongoing trade conversation, it raises all kinds of civil-liberty questions. and at the heart of it though is, is this in our best interest? taylor: we got more on this story from peter waldman in san francisco on how not to cure cancer. >> the cancer center, md anderson in houston, where they have had a bit of a crackdown on people they suspect are working
there as cancer researchers who have professional ties back in china. and there were very serious investigations into five of them. four of them have since left. and it smacked a little bit of overkill to people who were very close to it and people started using words like "mccarthyism." taylor: one of the characters is woo. walk me through that story. peter: dr. woo is an epidemiologist and quite a prominent one. she joined the company having -- she joined md anderson having been educated in china in the mid-1990's and worked there some 27 years before being challenged very directly by the national institutes of health. the big funder of biomedical research in the united states. the nih, using information from the fbi, which had received her
computer accounts and done a thorough investigation of her past, accused the doctor of having undisclosed relationships, professional relationships, where she was paid in china to advise and work in her field of epidemiology. and this created a kind of parallel structure they said was against their rules. one thing led to another and the md anderson came down very hard on her and she left in january. it is a peculiar situation in that epidemiology is not an area that leads to a lot of intellectual property. there were no direct accusations of ip theft or trade secret theft or espionage, but it shows the sensitivity within the biomedical community and certainly at md anderson. taylor: this seems to be a
change where we want to protect the research, even if it slows down some of the cures for cancer, because we do not want to involve china. peter: taylor, that is exactly what is going on and it is surprising because it is being driven by the nih. i interviewed the number two there who described the situation where he considers this pre-patented material as he called it or what we would describe as basic scientific research without any proprietary information technology associated with it as being highly valuable and something that the united states needs to protect from china. taylor: how recently has this all occurred? the last few weeks or years? peter: the trump administration has ratcheted up the rhetoric and some of the actions. and through questioning and into the nih,icy
since early 2018. by last summer, the director sent out a letter to 10,000 recipient institutions getting nih funding saying this is very serious to the nih and you cannot have researchers with undisclosed ties to foreign countries. taylor: the thing about this escalating trade war is it is extremely difficult for the u.s. and china to do without one another. and there is not enough incentive yet for the rest of the world to choose sides. here is senior reporter mark champion in london on why this next cold war will not look much like the old one. mark: the iron curtain that you are talking about now is the tech iron curtain in which you would have two technological zones. either you live in the chinese zone and the 5g networks are rolled out by huawei and your driverless cars are provided by baidu.
your social media is wechat. and on the other side, you will have google, facebook, tesla. you have all these kinds of things. so that is the idea. that we will have something similar. and as you can see in the dynamics of what is happening in particular with huawei, people can see that cold war separation beginning. but it is with tech -- and there is no barbed wire, no total separation. you can still drive a ford in china. and it will look quite different. we are not even clear, this is a prediction, we are not even clear it will happen this way. islor: what is interesting drawing either a physical or virtual barrier, a tech cold war as you described, this is not easy. take us to the u.k.
for countries to take sides, it is not easy especially when you're are talking about technology. mark: absolutely. the u.k. is a perfect example for how difficult and complicated this will be. you just had the d-day celebrations reminding us of the long, deep alliances between the u.k. and the u.s. they were fast allies all through the cold war. and here you have the u.k. saying to the u.s. over huawei, actually, we do not think we need to separate in the way you are talking. there was a preliminary decision made that we will allow huawei to build quite a bit of our 5g network. not all of it. not the most sensitive core. but quite a lot of it. the u.s. is not happy because they want a complete separation. when our as close as the u.k.
says they do not want to choose, that tells you there will be an uncertain process at the very least. jason: what is also interesting is extricating or decoupling or detangling or disentangling all of the big global tech companies from each other. that could take years to undo and then years to reform a lot of these alliances on either side of this digital curtain, right? mark: absolutely right. there is some of this beginning to happen. a number of companies have moved some of their manufacturing operations out of china in anticipation that this could get worse and they could get hit. there has been some movement but you are talking about the disentangling of a global network, a supply chain network that has grown up over a period of several decades and that will be really difficult to undo.
when you think about companies like foxconn, a taiwanese company that has huge operations in china producing parts and whole products for companies like apple. how do you untangle all of that without doing enormous damage? taylor: still ahead, turnaround times two, a mission to clean up mexico's most important companies. plus a new ceo tries to save the once great g.e. this is "bloomberg businessweek." ♪
you can also find us online at businessweek.com and our mobile app. in this week's feature section, bringing g.e. back from the brink. the new ceo may not be able to restore it to its past glory, but he might be the best hope to fix it. come into my terminal at gtv . we charted the g.e. market cap. it once outpaced all of its rivals like united technologies, 3m, and honeywell. recently, the market cap has fallen below its major competitors. they are saying the key to turning around g.e. will be to sell off some of its unprofitable businesses and refocus on a laser-type strategy. we got more on g.e. from our reporter in chicago. epstein take theo the g.m. job? he was loaded up at the boston red sox. why? the greatest comeback, 108 years, no world championship. so now, larry culp is offered g.e.
and he talked about this in an article with the harvard business school publication friends ared, my telling me, you have a great life, why are you stepping into this mess? you have a great legacy. you made all of this money and have a great life. why would you step into this mess? and he said, that is exactly why i should do it. carol: this is what is interesting. wall street is not convinced that his set of skills is a great match for general electric. he acquired a lot of companies. g.e. is going to sell off businesses. you are also talking about general electric being a company where the revenues are five or six times more. it is a different beast. you cite analysts in your story that say we do not think these are the right skills for what g.e. needs right now. bryan: yes, what he did at daniher is different in the short term than what he has to direct g.e., and he certainly
never faced the financial challenges, the magnitude of the ranchers challenges, that he does -- financial challenges, that he does at g.e. he also faces, you know, an inbred culture. and he is really working hard to change that, to get everybody online with his vision of what he calls "true lean." and he throws around a lot of japanese words to bring home the point. in fact -- carol: and he is doing it under the spotlight. daniher is not a company we talked about a lot or ever, but g.e. we talk about all the time. bryan: and every time he opens his mouth, the market is listening and reacting. and you know, he is having to learn a little bit of that skill. i have read a bunch of his stuff and he seems to be getting a
little bit better at it, but he has emphasized that he will be transparent. and for the most part, the endless of wall street have given him credit for being more transparent than his predecessors. jason: one thing that seems clear and seems apiece with his previous experience and previous style, he is very hands-on. you open with a great anecdote of a plant manager getting an e-mail directly from him essentially saying, i am coming to visit. bryan: yes, and that is not his only one. that was the wind turbine plant in pensacola. he just emails the plant manager on the sunday saying, is it ok if i come down there? like he would say, "that is not a great day for me." [laughter] but he did it in muskegon. there is a plant up there, around the same time. and he told the guy that runs those businesses that we are going to muskegon, we may as well go to indiana where there is another plant.
he was visiting factories when he was just on the board, and even before he was ceo. this is what he does. taylor: in the economic section, another company with a new ceo in the middle of a turnaround. can the new chief reverse its declines? here is the economics editor. >> production has been sliding for 14 years and is now at about half of what it was in 2004. the company is carrying $100 billion in debt, which makes it the most indebted company of its kind. and last week, it was downgraded by fitch which in short order also downgraded mexico's sovereign debt, which gives you an idea of how deeply intertwined their futures are. taylor: when you talk about how deeply intertwined they are, it is really interesting because in the story, you talked about the new ceo in charge and how closely they are related to the government. who is the new ceo?
>> octavio romero is a close associate of the president, amlo. and they know each other going way back to an oil state. so they both also know a lot about the oil industry, although i should say that this man is an agronomist by training. he has no oil experience per se but, the traditionally the ceo job has been a political appointment. that said, the corruption problem also predates his current tenure. he has this though that as he likes to say, if you cut off the head from the body, which means if you replace the top management of the company, the corruption problem will mostly be solved. taylor: talk to me about that corruption problem. because it seems like you do not just get to this position overnight. this is years and decades of
mismanagement, not to mention production declines, and corruption on top of that that gets us here. how did pemex get here? >> it is a bit like what we saw in brazil with petrobras with the big investigation that brought down a government there. so i mean, you have this hugely sprawling company with upstream operations and downstream with refineries and gas stations. and everyone is taking a little . and one of the biggest manifestations of corruption was the gasoline theft problem that mexico had which the whole world learned about in january and there was a massive explosion in a town that killed 100 people because the gangs were trying to tap gasoline from a pipeline. so, that was the first and most obvious thing to fix. that kind of problem was being facilitated by insiders in the company that were communicating with the gangs and allowing them access to the infrastructure.
so, one of the first moves of the new government was to dispatch the military to guard the pipelines. pemex also turned off certain conduits which meant there were huge lines at the gas stations. and then, they started rounding up a lot of these gang members, some of them who are actually from drug cartels, because there has been this infiltration. according to romero, there has been a 95% reduction in gas theft, which will add up to 35 billion pesos in additional revenue for the company. so that is important and it should not be discounted. on the other hand, nobody can verify the figures because the company is opaque. and the company has not said if anybody inside the company has been disciplined or dismissed. taylor: coming up, how to freeze your salary. plus, comcast's youth movement has a push into e-sports. this is "bloomberg businessweek." ♪
taylor: welcome back to "bloomberg businessweek." i am taylor riggs. you can also listen to us on the radio on sirius xm and also on a.m. 1130. 106.1 in boston. 99.1 fm in washington, d.c., and in the bay area and in london on dab digital, and on the bloomberg business app. we have been hearing a lot about paid parental leave but not as much about pregnancy at work. day is facing discrimination lawsuits right now, but only one is about pregnancy discrimination. a main complainant in the case
worked there for five years got , really good reviews and promotions. she was working around-the-clock, pulled all nighters. and then she got pregnant and when she went on maternity leave , she came back for her annual review and they froze her salary. what she says is the only other time she had heard of a salary being frozen was when someone got into trouble for doing something really bad at work and there was an hr investigation. and instead of firing that employee, they froze the salary which was a punitive measure. so she could not figure out why this was happening. she asked her superiors. they did not give her a reason. she got pregnant again and went on maternity leave again and they froze her salary again and then told her to look for a new job she says. carol: what does the company say? >> they say that -- they would not talk to me, but they have a public statement that says -- this is not true. here are some facts and figures about how many women we have at jones day and we will litigate
this in court. carol: there are women but they are not in a senior associate partner position. >> half of the associates are women, but only a quarter of them are partners. and she sends a lot of those people have been brought in from other firms. like they have already been promoted to that level and then they enter. i do not know necessarily how accurate that is because she does not know the whole firm. but that is what she saw. carol: it goes to a bigger story and you put this out very eloquently in your writing, that we are sidelining women and that means they do not have as much economic power ultimately versus men. >> when you look at the pay gap, how much women make relative to men, and when you look at people just out of college, women and men in their early 20's and early careers, they make about the same. and it really starts to dip when women get into their 30's and start to have kids. even the economists who study this, they say if you only focus on women that have children versus women that do not, it is
much more severe for women that have kids. men on the other hand have a salary bump when they have kids. jason: where will the pressure come from, the private sector or the legal system? what is your sense? >> i think it will depend on each company. for jones day, the pressure is from the legal system. but i think for a lot of companies, what will happen is that they will have to give men leave also. because women are not going to be able to really break free from this stereotype and these gender roles unless the men can take on some of the home care and childcare burden may have. and men cannot do that unless companies give them the freedom to do that. jason: you also talked about the settlement from jp morgan that a man made over that very issue of essentially being denied the role of caregiver because his wife was not incapacitated. >> right. jp morgan has about 16 weeks of
paid leave that is gender-neutral. they give it to the primary caregiver. the secondary caregiver gets much less. so he applied for the primary caregiver, 16 weeks, and they said no, his wife was the primary caregiver and so he sued. and they settled. but that still assumes that in a two-parent household, one is primary. and it is going to be difficult i think for people to work through that and not assume that the woman is the primary caregiver. taylor: coming up comcast , invests in the future of gaming. on sunday.ering what the future may hold for ups. this is "bloomberg businessweek." ♪
at comcast, we didn't build the nation's largest gig-speed network just to make businesses run faster. we built it to help them go beyond. because beyond risk... welcome to the neighborhood, guys. there is reward. ♪ ♪ beyond work and life... who else could he be? there is the moment. beyond technology... there is human ingenuity. ♪ ♪ every day, comcast business is helping businesses go beyond the expected, to do the extraordinary. take your business beyond.
taylor: welcome back to "bloomberg businessweek." i am taylor riggs. still ahead, uber drones may soon make a fast food even summer.his . and speaking of summer, holly peterson on her new novel. first up, comcast's youth movement. in the featured section we talked to the prince of the $160 billion comcast empire.
he is the son of ceo brian roberts and is leading the cable giant into the gen-z world of e-sports. here is chris paul mary nla. lmeri in l.a. >> he is the 29 year old president of comcast's e-sports business. he is not as any executive, but the son of the company's ceo and grandson of the founder of comcast. we told the story to look not just at this dynasty, but also about this new emerging business, one of the hottest ones in entertainment, e-sports. if you are not familiar, this is people watching other people play video games. tucker roberts grew up in this milieu and grew up with video games and had a different view than a lot of older executives. he was tapped to invest in the
business on behalf of comcast. what we are seeing is a lot of traditional media and sports companies diving into the e-sports business. because everyone is realizing that viewing habits of traditional media is changing. people want to be able to watch things anytime they want. and in sports, demographics are changing. for example, football. a lot of parents have trouble with football. at the same time, they have less trouble with the violence of video games if you look at the rise of games like fortnight. taylor: you use tucker roberts as a lens to which you are showing an old media company , comcast, really getting into this new venture. i wonder if this is sort of an insight into how these companies are targeting a younger demographic and trying to capture some of that streaming audience via e-sports.
chris: absolutely. and it is funny because the videogame industry, which has a history of not being welcoming to women, you look at these ads pitches for the advertising they are trying to get on these new streaming platforms and they are saying look, we have this great male demographic that loves young people and this is the way to reach them. so yes, this is all about reaching the consumer who may not be watching monday night football. taylor: can e-sports sustain the height going forward? chris: that is always the question. a lot of money flowing in. they just did the first $100 million deal in the sports. will overwatch last as long as the nfl? part of tucker's strategy is to try to acquire as many games as
he can. sort of spread the risk around. taylor: another company thinking about the future is ups as online retailers and competition grows. the company is going through continuous transformation according to the ceo. david: we constantly review the needs of our customers. what we were hearing recently was not only that our saturday ground our competitors provide as we do but that we , deliver to businesses on saturday where they don't, and we pick up packages on saturday that can be delivered on monday over 170 countries in the world. by picking up on saturday, we can deliver on monday. we are starting to hear more about the need for sunday delivery. taylor: are you not ready to do it? david we are looking at it now. : in our most recent contract,
we have language that covers us for saturday and sunday. so we are pretty far down the path and we will talk about it. we have more to review. jason: strategically, how much do you worry about amazon? are they a frienenemy, a competitor? all of the above? david this world has gotten way : more complicated than having somebody labeled as a competitor or customer. it is often times a combination of both. you have to accept that we have mutually beneficial relationships. as long as we do, that is the path we are following. i would not say that we worry about amazon. we respect them just like we respect others that may be our competitors in certain parts of our business. but if we do our job and implement our transformation in carry out our strategies, then
we feel very comfortable in our position. carol: talk to us about that transformation plan. i have been at port and it's fascinating just logistically would you been doing. it's about getting packages from point a to point b, but you are working with the health care sector and other sectors. as you transform the company, how much becomes transformations versus what you are doing today? david: i will. we are 112 years old, so we have probably been through five major transformations in the history of our company. this is one of those. the message we are giving to our people is that this is continuous transformation. there is not a beginning or an end. the way the business world is changing, this is a way of life. and we really believe our people have accepted that we have focused in three particular areas. first of which is high-quality revenue growth. the second is increasing our efficiency using a lot of technology. third is broadening our
management team and our culture. cultures are like anything else, they have to change with the times. the sense of urgency is much more making decisions. it is much more important now. that is where we are focusing our leadership team. taylor: still ahead, the world's largest drone maker comes down to earth. book talk is hot in the hamptons. this is "bloomberg businessweek." ♪
taylor: welcome back to "bloomberg businessweek." i am taylor riggs. join us for bloomberg businessweek every day on the radio from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 wall street time. p.m. also catch up by listening to our podcast on itunes, soundcloud and bloomberg.com. and find us online and on our mobile app. turning to technology, businessweek got the first look
look at a drone maker dji's new creation. jeff: >> dji, which people will recognize as the maker of this quad copter drone, is now trying to expand into ground warfare with these diy $500 tanks. carol: it is part teaching tool, part battle bot. jeff: with the quad copter drone, the phantom, generally you are buying it ready to roll out of the box. this thing is significantly assembly required. jason: what are they going after? not just of the diy market necessarily, but i feel like this is the postmodern version of like building a little model airplane or something like that, but it is bigger than that. jeff very much so. : build your own remote control car kind of element to this. but the main objective they
would say, aside from attracting attention to other products, is to circle up with the robo masters competition they hold every year in shenzhen. it is a three-week tournament with a are trying to identify up and coming robotics talent. carol: this is a big deal! jeff: certainly in china, japan, and increasingly the u.s. it draws college students from all over. carol: tell us about it. who is there, how many people? the whole idea is they are just battling off against each other? jeff typically teams of college : aged students spending the time to put things together and tweaking them as needed to try to face-off and come out on top. carol: you also say there are robots that are medics. robots that are supply mules, right? jeff: that's right. as will be familiar to your kids there are pretty discrete roles , they fall into on any given
team to make sure the tactical assault are met carol: and there . is a reality show being filmed. jeff naturally, they are also : trying to identify the most talented roboticists and why not make a show out of that? jason: this is a real talent pool, in some ways. at a time when we talk about drones that will be employed by by uber eats. uber elevate is the business. the scientists and science behind this needs people underneath it. jeff absolutely. : the company would say that education is one of their biggest priorities as far as making sure the pipeline stays strong. they have knocked out most other competitors of any significance as far as recreational and civilian drone making goes.
but they are battling themselves because the margins are low. taylor: staying with drones, the first drone food delivery is on track for the summer. kay: i got a chance to preview uber elevate, the part of uber that will take everybody up in the sky, as well as food delivery. i got to see a preliminary test. they had a drone and they were working with mcdonald's. i watched a big mac go up in the air and it was supposed to fly half a mile out of sight line but the winds were not , cooperating, so instead it did a little demo. it went up and down. a little like womp-womp. jason: food delivery has taken on a totally different dimension in a lot of ways and we are talking about taking it even further. what is it that has made it such? kate: it is just convenience.
let's say millennials. why get up from your sofa if you don't have to? unlike most of us. why get up from your sofa when you can command something to come right to you. you can customize it, it's amazing. one thing that uber elevate envisions which i think is awesome is they have signed on a high-end restaurant in san diego called juniper and ivy. maybe one day we can order pink peppercorn and there in brooklyn -- i live in manhattan -- i could have pink peppercorn dishes delivered to my house without fighting the crowds or taking an hour to get there. jason: or relying on a driver or even a bicyclist to navigate his way through traffic carol: how does this work? would you literally open up your front door? is it draw spots?
kate: it is not coming to your apartment building anytime soon. but they will have designated drop-off spots and couriers who will pick it up. be standing by ready to pick it up. the other thing they are working on is they want to put qr codes on roofs. then the drone will be programed to land on the roof. carol: but don't they still need to get faa approval? kate: they feel pretty good about it. from what i understand, this guy who heads it up is very careful and he is -- they are definitely waiting on approval but they think it is close and they are getting ready to launch in july. carol: for somebody who knows the food space, what do you think drone delivery food is going to do? how was it going to change the way we live and how we view takeout? kate: it is going to speed
things up. there will be the thing where you want the fantastic visual of it. but when it comes down to it what most people want from delivery is money and convenience. and i think uber will absorb the cost of drone delivery for a while as convenience becomes key. they see that because they have built up a huge network of customers wanting convenience. taylor: coming up, art strikes a patriotic tone on the global stage. plus, holly peterson shares what it is like growing up in the 1%. this is "bloomberg businessweek." ♪
taylor: welcome back to "bloomberg businessweek." i am taylor riggs. you can also listen to us on the the radio on sirius xm channel 119 and in new york, in boston, in washington, d.c. in the bay area, and in london on dab digital and on the bloomberg business app. turning to "pursuits," art at a -- at this year's venice expo has seen a rise in patriotism. here is chris rouser. chris right now, it is the : venice biennale art show which happens every year. carol: what is that? i have no idea what this thing is. chris it is a huge expo for : international contemporary art. it has pavilions and a bunch of different countries have a pavilion.
they have artists, and represent the country. it is a lot of new art and new artists. sometimes, the art can be quite strange and it is not always great. for the past decade or so, it has really been about the artists exploring new things to say. in the past few years the past , couple of years, as nationalism has sort of risen around the world politically, we have seen the art in these national pavilions has also become sort of nationalist and patriotic. it has been interesting because that sort of patriotism has been divorced from that stage for a long time. jason: i was interested to know that the u.s. pavilion, for instance, is owned by the guggenheim but also the state department? that was a twist. carol: that was a "wait, what" moment.
chris curators run these : pavilions but are also supported by the national government. it is a nation posies statement about art at a given moment. nation's statement about art at a given moment. what is interesting about this year, we have got, for example, brazil has this great video art about this dance format in brazil. it is defiant and gender fluid. the art is really progressive and brazil is not in a progressive moment. it is certainly not a hospitable place for lgbtq people. so to have this kind of artistic statement, it is kind of talking about what the artists wishes brazil stood for, and things brazil really does stand for which is in contrast with what the government is saying. carol: the story talks about what happened after world war ii and how these pavilions were used. chris yeah. : it got to be this thing where it used to be kind of patriotic and america would be like here is our abstract expressionism.
this is the freedom and the release from boundaries you can express in america. and then the russian for filling more about socialist realism. kind of like this is what the proletariat looks like. this is sort of that ideal. after world war ii, it did have this national stance. jason jackson pollock, these : were names that helped propel it big names even further. carol: thinking about how many cultures and citizens are suppressed for repressed in terms of being a former they can put out of you. chris and be in dialogue with : other countries together in this one place. carol: so they really represent the political turmoil we are seeing. chris yeah, it is kind of a : response to what is going on in the world. these things are planned out a couple years in advance. it is not responding to immediate politics of the world, it is kind of evolving as world politics evolve. in reflecting it in an
interesting way. taylor: with summer in full swing, it is time to head to the beach, party it up, and live the good life. in her new book, "it's hot in the hamptons," holly peterson writes about growing up in the 1% and how it shaped her life. holly i believe we are in a : world of unbelievable inequality between the 99% and the 1%. and at 1% is even being parsed out into .0001%. and not enough people understand what goes on inside that world. i grew up inside that world. i also happen to be a hard-working journalist. i was at abc and newsweek my whole life. i feel it is my duty to expose these people and to tell people how it really does. -- really goes. because people need to know how completely insane it is. carol: take us to the hamptons over the summer. in the book. we don't want to give it all away because we want people to figure it out and read it. tell us how you show those inequalities through your writing. holly: i dated a local guy in
the hamptons for eight years. i wrote my last book called "it happens in the hamptons" about the 99% and 1% in a testosterone-fueled summer community. because you see the differences between income so much more so in the summer. there are more jets and uber helicopters. people have more staff, they have more parties, they entertain more. and in cities like new york, it is harder to show how much money you have during the colder months. in the summer, you can drive around in a porsche. people do not really drive in new york so there is more. you arrive in a jet on the weekend. there is so much more ways to show in the summer that i felt the hamptons is prime material to expose the ways of the wealthy, satirize them, and hopefully have some commentary on what that says about our world today.
people think it is a light beach read, but i hate when they say that. i think it is actually a substantive look at our society. jason: you do get a sense of how this is, in some ways, a tale as old as time. it is the seasonals versus the townies. it is about money, it is about sex, it is about power and all of that mixed together in new york. how do you create these sort of archetypal characters? holly i see them around me all : the time. i grew up with a man who was an important wall street guy, a self-made man named pete peterson. he died last year. he was an incredible person. he really taught me that a life well lived is a life where you are working incredibly hard. until the day you die on the one hand. on the other hand, it is a deep awareness of your privilege, of giving back, and an awareness of
other people. that is really who he was. i don't know if you knew him at all. i try to be a journalist who really tells stories as i see them. and i try to expose the things that i think are important to be exposed. one is inequality and the differences between us. and also the psychology of these incredibly privileged people. jason: what is it that has allowed us to get to this point where you read a book like this and we say, yeah, that makes sense. even though it is outrageous. you mean their bad values? jason: yeah. holly: i find -- having grown up with one and having been around them, i find that the currently successful people are incredibly insecure. they are very anxious. how may times have you ever met a really cool, relaxed, normal
ceo who is running a huge multinational conglomerate? you just don't see it. they are anxious by trade. and that anxiety and need to succeed is what makes them head of everything. in order to have that drive where you are going to work 18 hours a day until you are 92, there has to be something in you from your childhood that is fueling a need to achieve and succeed. and sometimes, with certain people, it goes a little haywire. you turn into a total jerk because you are so anxious. you are so anxious about how you look and appear and never, never is enough. that is when people behave badly. taylor: you can hear that full conversation on our bloomberg business extra podcast. find it in our daily podcast at itunes, soundcloud, bloomberg.com over every you download your podcasts. "bloomberg businessweek" is available on newsstands, online,
david: what does the moment of a lift refer to? melinda: if we can lift up all women, we will change the world. david: do you find sometimes a woman would say, take my child? melinda: it is heartbreaking. that is the story of women, many around the world. david: when someone called you, we are giving you $50 billion or $60 billion we did not expect, what did you say? melinda: bill and i took a walk and we both cried. david: when did you first meet bill? melinda: he said, a bunch of us are going dancing, why don't you come? david: is he a big dancer? melinda: he likes to. david: ok, all right, ok. >> would you fix your tie, please? david: a lot of people wouldn't recognize me if my tie was fix, but ok. we will leave it this way. alright.