Skip to main content

tv   Anderson Cooper 360  CNN  December 18, 2017 5:00pm-6:00pm PST

5:00 pm
especially not the d.c. circuit. >> senator kennedy revealed he spoke to president trump on friday, suggesting he withdraw the nomination. petersen, currently an fcc commissioner, withdrew himself today. he hoped that his two decades of service was better than two minutes. good evening. i'm john berman in for anderson. we begin with tragedy in washington state. a deadly train derailment near the stcity of dupont has killedt least three people and sent dozens to the hospital. 13 of the 14 cars jumped the tracks. the ntsb is sending a 20-member team to investigate as we speak. joining me now by front is brook brovo with the washington state patrol. what can you tell us about the search for people who still
5:01 pm
might be inside the derailed cars? >> i'm being told that all of the derailed cars and all of the vehicles on the ground have been searched. >> at this point, they have all been searched? >> that's what i have been told, fire crews and rescues -- they have searched all of the cars so our firm number at this point is three casualties. however, there are some very critically injured people so we don't know if that number will change. >> this is an important development for us. up until this point we were led to believe that some of the cars were not safe enough to go in. at this point, you believe all the cars have been searched so there are no people, as far as you know, left inside? >> not from what i'm being told. fire has said that they have searched all of the cars and that is the information i'm given at this time. >> three people killed, many more injured, some in critical condition. do you have any idea how many are in the hospital at this point? >> at our latest, roughly 100,
5:02 pm
give or take a few, were transported to local hospitals. >> i know troopers were the first to reach the scene. have you ever seen anything like this before? >> you know, it's difficult, as a state trooper you see very different things and you're never quite prepared for anything like this. this is a magnitude that i haven't seen in my career and it's very tragic. so it is rare. >> the scene of the accident, you say all of the cars have been searched and they are secure. is the scene itself safe? we see these cars perched precariously over the highway right now. is there any concern for the scene? >> yes, there is. so state patrol did their initial investigation and they have scanners and they've completed their investigation. there are other -- it's a could operative effort and other departments are doing their investigation. we cannot secure those other rail cars until they're done with their investigation but we do have some cranes and equipment here to secure that and make the scene safe.
5:03 pm
>> so the safety concerns that were raised about this high-speed train, do you know if any of those concerns were ever brought to washington state patrol? >> i don't know. sorry. not at my level. >> i understand. there were different investigations going on and different concerns for different areas of law enforcement. but at this point, as we head into evening in washington state, what can you tell us about the investigation? >> at this point, like i said, state patrol has done their investigation. they're standing by to be in assistance. we're waiting for ntsb to start their investigation and just cause quite the backup in washington state. we've had to shut down the freeway and this is a main artery throughout washington. so that is state patrol's big concern right now along with recovery and just making sure that everybody is safe and that families are reunited. >> thanks for bringing us the breaking news. all the train cars believed to
5:04 pm
have been searched. the death toll stands at three with no one left on the cars, as far as the state patrol knows. many injured and some in critical condition. we'll bring you much more on the deadly derailment as more information comes in. tonight, though, we are keeping them honest with new reporting. it seems to be an alternate reality for the president, reality where he sees no security threat of russian meddling and, in fact, no "r" word all together inside the white house because some aides are reportedly scared to bring it up which wouldn't matter but intelligence officials believe they will try to do this again. the president is telling friends he's expecting something of a christmas miracle in the russia probe. this is according to new exclusive reporting from cnn's sarah murray and raju manu. the president is insisting not only he's going to be exonerated but special counsel robert mueller is going to write a
5:05 pm
letter clearing him of any wrongdoing that he can wave around as proof that he didn't do anything wrong. a christmas miracle. there is no indication from mueller or his team that they believe in miracles or that the investigation is in its final stages, only mueller and his team know for sure but some legal experts say the investigation might actually be ramping up with michael flynn's guilt plea in cooperation. as to the best christmas card ever, this magical letter of exoneration, it's unclear where that idea even comes from. the real problem, though, according to one source, is that if the president doesn't get what he wants for christmas or soon thereafter if this letter doesn't come, he'll have some kind of a meltdown. that's a direct quote. he thinks his attorneys have lulled him into a false sense of security and unrealistic expectations which could backfire spectacularly but now may make the president less agitated. this is what the president said
5:06 pm
yesterday about e-mails that mueller's team obtained, the president's lawyer says, unlawfully, which mueller's team denies. >> not looking good. it's not looking good. it's quite sad to see that. my people were very upset about it. i can't imagine there's anything on them, frankly, because as we said, there's no collusion. there's no collusion whatsoever. but a lot of lawyers thought that was pretty sad. >> [ inaudible ]? >> no, i'm not. >> more on those e-mails later in the program. as to the last part, not planning to fire mueller, one source predicts if the president doesn't get this exoneration letter, again, a letter that seems to exist only in his own mind, that he will fire mueller, which would leave him vulnerable to impeachment. on friday, the president said lawmakers need to get back to running the country. >> let's put it this way. there is absolutely no collusion. that has been proven. >> keeping them honest.
5:07 pm
that hasn't been proven. it might be eventually but it hasn't been proven yet. the mueller investigation is not over no matter how many times the president repeats himself. the fact is, it's not over and we know the president likes to repeat himself on this issue. >> the russia story is a total fabrication. it's just an excuse for the greatest loss in the history of american politics. >> russia is a rouse. >> there is no collusion. i don't speak to russians. it's a made-up story. the entire thing has been a witch hunt. look, there's been no obstruction. there's been no collusion. all i can tell you is this. there was to collusion. there was no nothing. >> here is more of what the president said friday. >> let's put it this way. there is absolutely no collusion. that has been proven. when you look at the committees, whether it's a senate or the
5:08 pm
house, everybody -- my worst enemies, they walk out, they say, there is no collusion but we'll continue to look. >> now, on those congressional investigations, the new reporting from sarah murray and manu raju and jeremy diamond is that there has been a conscious effort to avoid the president because of allegations of impropriety. meanwhile, sources say in a call with senate majority leader mitch mcconnell in august the president railed about the allegations and they have steered clear since then. senator lindsey graham avoids talking about russia because the president will complain about it and say he didn't do anything wrong. the president's daily briefing is structured in a way to avoid upsetting him because if anyone brings up russia, it takes it off the rails. so there are people around the president telling him what he wants to hear. others not bringing up the country that attacked american
5:09 pm
democracy because it will make him mad. and he has yet to even have one cabinet level meeting on russian interference or what to do about it. and now that the president is expecting a letter of exoneration from mueller to come soon, it may have created an artificial calm with some of those around him concerned about an impending storm, much like a letter. we'll keep you posted. joining me now is senator richard blumenthal, a member of the senate judiciary committee. senator, thank you for being with us. you were attorney general for the state of connecticut for a long time. you know about investigations. the president says he nows believe the special counsel robert mueller is going to send him a letter exonerating him. is this how it works, generally? >> very rarely. i can say not only as state attorney general but also as a former united states attorney, this kind of letter is sent exonerating, it's rare, virtually nonexistent in the case of the president. it may happen but this
5:10 pm
investigation is mounting in intensity and scope. it is not the beginning of the end. it is the end of the beginning. and there will be more indictments and more convictions, i think, as a near certainty before this investigation is over. it has penetrated the white house. it's nearing the oval office. and so the creation of these false expectations is really a disservice to the president and the country. >> obviously the white house lawyers, the president's lawyers on this issue say something different. they believe at this point that everyone inside the white house who was going to be interviewed has been interviewed. the president believes the investigation is wrapping up. what signs do you see that they are wrong here? >> the conviction of michael flynn and his cooperation is a shattering blow to the trump presidency. but i also see the increasing
5:11 pm
seeming seeming seemingly orchestrated attacks on robert mueller, on the fbi, on the investigation itself from the president's allies in congress, which is a sign of, frankly, fear or apprehension and also by the president himself, the calling of the investigation a hoax or a witch hunt and the attacks on the fbi saying its reputation is in tatters certainly is a sign that there are people with something to hide in the white house. >> you say orchestrated attack. do you believe your colleagues in congress, your republican colleagues in congress are coordinating these comments with the white house? >> they are all of the appearances of coordinated attacks, whether it's by the white house or by other supporters of the president directly ofr indirectly. i see signs of a coordinated attack on this investigation seeking to discredit and undermine it to take, for example, the claim that these
5:12 pm
e-mails from the gsa were improperly obtained, absolutely a bogus claim. there's no executive privilege, no lawyer-client privilege. the gsa was the account owner in official legal terms and yet the president's allies are seeking to discredit and undermine the investigation. >> over the weekend, your democratic colleague in the house, congressman adam schiff, he said he's, quote, increasingly worried that republicans will shut down the house intelligence committee at the end of the month. do you share that concern on the committee that you sit on, the senate judiciary committee? do you think that there is a rush to finish business? >> i firmly believe that chairman grassley, who is a straight shooter, would have no tolerance to shut down this investigation prematurely. i'm hopeful that my other republican colleagues share the passion and zeal that we have for uncovering the truth about any obstruction of justice as
5:13 pm
well as collusion involving the trump campaign and the russians because we have oversight responsibility. we have a very important obligation to make sure that legislation is passed if there was an obstruction to prevent it in the future and there is increasing evidence that the russians are continuing their attack on our democracy and they will go through the 2018 election repeating that kind of undermining of our democracy if they are not made to pay a price. >> the senate intelligence committee, richard burr, told cnn today in response to a question on whether his committee interviewed a majority of the witnesses and he said, quote, i think it's safe to say we have two other campaigns we're just starting on. one of them we believe he's talking about is a green party candidate jill stein. do you think there's anything to mind there? do you think that will be fertile ground for investigation? >> the russian attack on our
5:14 pm
elections in 2016 was endlessly ingenious and inventive using all kinds of social media, all kinds of intermediaries, sources of information for them. so any possible attempt by the russians, either to enhance the stein campaign or use it in some other way so as to undermine our democracy i think is worthy of investigation. >> you haven't seen any sign yet yourself that that has happened, have you? >> i am reluctant to comment on documents and testimony that have been submitted confidentially to our committee. >> right. >> but i think that chairman burr is well-founded in talking as sir couple speculatively as he did. >> joe manchin, your democratic colleague from west virginia, said he didn't believe al frarvegen should have resigned and that he was forced out by your senate democratic colleagues. do you still feel that al franken needs to resign and leave the senate? >> i think perhaps most
5:15 pm
importantly we need to respect and believe the brave and strong women who are coming forward to raise these allegations about a variety of spheres in american life, including politics but also entertainment and business and sports. al franken made his decision and i supported it after he made it. i was not among the senators calling for him to resign and i think it's his decision. >> now that he made it, though, you still feel that he should commit to it, that changing his mind now, do you think that would be the wrong idea? >> i think that's really a decision for al franken to make but he really has, i think, crossed the bridge at this point. >> but if he changed his mind, you'd be okay with that? >> it's his decision. i think he's made it and it's the right decision to have resigned. very strongly, it is the right decision to have resigned. >> senator richard blumenthal of connecticut, thank you for being with us. >> thank you. coming up, candidate trump
5:16 pm
often talked about hillary clinton's e-mails during the campaign. this time it's tens and thousands of e-mails from his transition team that are now part of the mueller investigation and we'll have the latest on the deadly derailment in washington state as well. wa we know from the scene when "360" continues. a wealth of information. a wealth of perspective. ♪ a wealth of opportunities. that's the clarity you get from fidelity wealth management. straightforward advice, tailored recommendations, tax-efficient investing strategies, and a dedicated advisor to help you grow and protect your wealth. fidelity wealth management. to help you grow and protect your wealth. run, jthe power of in to tempur-pedic sleep with our 90-day trial and being the highest ranked mattress in customer satisfaction by jd power, it's easy to love. find your exclusive retailer at
5:17 pm
was supposed to be a wake reup call for our government?sh people all across the country lost their savings, their pensions and their jobs. i'm tom steyer and it turned out that the system that had benefited people like me who are well off, was, in fact, stacked against everyone else. it's why i left my investment firm and resolved to use my savings for the public good. but here we are nine years later and this president and the republican congress are making a bad situation even worse. they won't tell you that their so called "tax reform" plan is really for the wealthy and big corporations, while hurting the middle class. it blows up the deficit and that means fewer investments in education, health care and job creation. it's up to all of us to stand up to this president.
5:18 pm
not just for impeachable offenses, but also to demand a country where everyone has a real chance to succeed. join us. your voice matters. at t-mobile when you holiday twogether, great things come in two's. like t-mobile and netflix. right now when you get an unlimited family plan, netflix is included. wow t-mobile covers your netflix subscription, so you can catch the hottest new movies and shows all year long on us. amazing and it's your last chance to buy any of these hot new samsung galaxy phones and get a 2nd one free. that's one samsung for you and one to gift. just in time to finish off your list. twogether.
5:19 pm
it's a like, a dagger?a worm! a tiny sword? bread...breadstick? a matchstick! a lamppost! coin slot! no? uhhh... 10 seconds. a stick! a walking stick! eiffel tower, mount kilimanjaro! (ding) time! sorry, it's a tandem bicycle. what? what?! as long as sloths are slow, you can count on geico saving folks money. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. as i mentioned at the top of the program, russia investigation special counsel robert mueller and his team have obtained tens of thousands of e-mails from the trump transition team and the president isn't happy about it. lawyers representing the trump
5:20 pm
transition accused mueller's team of getting unauthorized access to the e-mails which a spokesman for mueller denies. joining me now is jeffrey toobin and alan dershowitz. they say the access was authorized. mueller's team disagrees. how do you see it? >> i think mueller is write. these were .gov e-mails. they don't need a subpoena to obtain government e-mails. they were warned they have no expectation of privacy in these e-mails. there was just no reason, legal, credential or otherwise to do differently than what the mueller team did. >> professor dershowitz, you say, though, that mueller's team acted carelessly. >> they did. they did. this is a cutting-edge issue that courts are confronting
5:21 pm
every day and coming out with different resolutions. whether you can enmasse get e-mails, some privileged e-mails, lawyer-client e-mails, there was no reason for a special prosecutor who may be going after the president not to wear a belt and suspenders and to go and get a warrant. it's the easiest thing in the world to get. judges give out warrants like christmas candy. why not protect yourself from what inevitably is going to be a defense attack? why give ammunition to the other side if you can so easily avoid this question from even being a plausible one? look, in the end, jeffrey may be right but why take a chance? >> jeffrey, why not? >> because alan is advocating the sean hannity standard, which is do something that sean hannity would find okay. that's a fool's game. the people are going to criticize mueller no matter what he does.
5:22 pm
i think there's a better standard, which is the law. the law is, you don't need a subpoena. you don't need a search warrant to get .gov e-mails. i'm unaware of any case where the government needs any special authorization to get government e-mails. i mean, maybe the law should be different. but i don't -- >> first of all -- >> think there is any law that is different. >> first of all, it should be different and civil libertarian shouldn't be moving to see an expansion of this dangerous development. second of all, i'm not aware of any case where the e-mails, massive numbers of e-mails from a transition team, which is quasi public, quasi private, sure, it's .government but why take a chance? it's not the sean hannity standard. it's the justice kennedy and alito standard. make sure there's no possibility when you're going after the potential of the president of the united states, you take no
5:23 pm
risks and no chances. you cover yourself in every possible way. and that's not what sean hannity wants. he'd much prefer to see the special prosecutor be sloppy. i want to see the special prosecutor be accurate to protect himself from any possible challenge, a challenge that i would make if it were one of my clients. >> well, look, i think alan is, as always, a principled civil lib te libertarian who has very different ideas about what the law should be. all i'm saying is that as far as i'm aware, the law is, currently, that mueller had the right to do what he did and i don't see why he has to pretend that the law might be something different down the line when he is simply applying the law as it applies today. >> why would there be any executive privilege here if, by definition, the president-elect is not yet the president, not yet the executive. >> isn't that the irony? the argument on the other side is no executive privilege
5:24 pm
because he's a private citizen. on the other hand, he's a government official for getting, not getting a warrant. you can't have it both ways. clearly, anybody in the transition team is in a quasi public, quasi private position. there is no case law on this. the last thing you ever -- when you're a patient, you never want to hear the doctor say, that's an interesting symptom. and when you're a special prosecutor, you never want to hear a lawyer like me say, that presents an interesting novel issue. you have to avoid novel issues like that. >> they were not quasi told that their e-mails are government property. they were directly told by the gsa special counsel, the deputy counsel that these e-mails, you know, lived on government servers and were subject to monitoring and there would be no expectation of privacy. does that matter here? >> no, because, you know, you're told that routinely. i'm told -- i guess i'm on the harvard law school server and somewhere in fine print there must be a statement that harvard
5:25 pm
has a right to look into my e-mails. i don't expect harvard is going to do that and i do have a reasonable expectation of privacy if i'm writing to my lawyer, if i'm writing to the future president of the united states that there might be some privileges that will attach. it is not impossible that a judge may say that transition e-mails that haven't been vetted for any kind of privilege should have required a warrant, if that's even conceivable. >> jeffrey toobin, does this end up anywhere legally or does this just end up in the political sphere? >> i think what's most revealing here is that the transition lawyer wrote a letter and released it to the press and made a public stink. what he didn't do is go to court because he knew he would lose in court. i mean, this is -- >> too early. there's no standing. too early to go to court. >> this is part of the offensive against mueller's legitimacy. >> i agree with that. >> it's taking very different forms.
5:26 pm
some of it is narrowly legal, some of it is broadly political, some of it involves the personnel on mueller's staff but i don't think anyone should be confused that this is somehow a novel, legal issue. it's black letter law, it's not controversial and it is just another way of mobilizing the republican base to -- against mueller and prepare the groundwork for the possibility that he -- that the president might arrange for his firing. >> professor toobin and dershowitz, thank you. >> thank you. up next, breaking news on the republican tax plan. you're looking at live pictures from capitol hill where people from protesting this tax bill. we'll get into that when we come back. and later, a serious incident in the palin family, a family dispute. sarah palin's oldest son arrested on assault and other charges. what we know about what happened, coming up. what are you asking santa for? i want a rabbit!
5:27 pm
(train whistle blowing) hey, thomas. that's not how you get a rabbit. if you want a rabbit, you ask for a pony and then let them work you back down. mm-hmm. you're up! what if aunt joy wants the new iphone? you make this your final offer: ask for it on verizon. it's the most awarded network ever. that's why more people count on it. i'd like a giant singing rabbit in a rocket ship, please. she's a shrewd businesswoman. (vo) give the gift of iphone 8 and get one on us with verizon unlimited. only on the best network.
5:28 pm
money managers are pretty much the same. all but while some push high commission investment products, fisher investments avoids them. some advisers have hidden and layered fees. fisher investments never does. and while some advisers are happy to earn commissions from you whether you do well or not, fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management.
5:29 pm
♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ it all starts with a wish. the final days of wish list are here. hurry in and sign and drive off in a new lincoln with zero down and a complementary first months payment. but he hasoke up wwork to so he took aleve. if he'd taken tylenol, he'd be stopping for more pills right now. only aleve has the strength to stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. aleve. all day strong.
5:30 pm
5:31 pm
the protest on capitol hill over the republican tax bill. you're looking at pictures from the rotunda. we're just about a day or two away from a vote and it's looking more and more like republicans in both chambers have the number to send the bill to republicans' desk. susan collins and mike lee, the two newest yes votes but it's possible game day problems could still crop up. cnn's phil mattingly is live on capitol hill with the latest details. these two new republican yes votes, i'm not very good at math but nevertheless it sounds like a done deal. >> reporter: this more or less clinches. republicans needed a simple majority. senator mccain flew home to arizona.
5:32 pm
they need to be able to get this across the finish line and the votes of mike lee and susan collins gets them to that point. there's one more vote outstanding, jeff flake says he's still looking at the bill but republican leaders believe he will come along. the things he wanted in the bill, related to how it would phase out, those are in the final deal. they expect him to come along with a house vote on tuesday and senate vote as tune as tuesday evening, republican leaders right now are saying this is, quote, according to one aide, drama-free. they feel like they are pretty much there. >> there is some controversy over bob corker and his vote, his yes vote. wa are you hearing about that? >> senator corker voted against this bill in the senate because he had deficit concerns. there were no changes in the final conference report that addressed those deficit concerns. still he was a yes. part of the reason he may have been a yes is because of the changes to the so-called
5:33 pm
pass-through legislation that passed through their income on to the other side and pay it there. senate and house republicans have made it clear they want a significant tax cut for those entities but took different approaches. here's why senator corker's name started to come up. the senate provisions did not include provisions that would help real estate firms, basically active capital investment, didn't benefit a lot from the senate approach. the house approach did. now, the senate conference report took the baseline of the senate provision but they added in the capital investment approach from the house side of things. it made it look like anybody who is heavily involved in real estate or real estate llcs, like senator corker or perhaps president trump or jared kushner would benefit mightily from this tax cut there. i can tell you, john, from talking to sources and aides throughout this process and senator corker, orrin hatch, finance chairman have said he had nothing to do with this provision. he may benefit from it. what did, i'm told, mitch mcconnell is working intensively with senator corker behind the
5:34 pm
scenes frying to get him on board. senator john mccain, his absence, his inability to be here for the vote, i'm told that played a role in senator corker's final decision. it wasn't any specific provision, john. >> phil mattingly, thank you so much. joining me now to weigh in, david chalian. david, thank you for being with us. >> sure. >> they say that the congressional republicans and the president are desperate for a legislative win. how big of an understatement would that be? >> a big one. if they were writing a list of all of their big accomplishments, there would be nothing on it, really. maybe they'd put getting neil gorsuch on the supreme court. that was a pretty big accomplishment. but john, congressional republican leaders have described this to their own members behind closed doors as an existential threats to their majorities. what we saw in the polling throughout much of the year, john, is republican voters were so dissatisfied with their republican leaders in congress that they voted into power for
5:35 pm
not accomplishing the campaign promises, that their numbers were really beginning to take a hit. they really do see this as an unbelievably moment to take a big ticket item and go back to the voters and say look what we did. >> it's a big item for some republican candidates, to be sure. the fact is, when you look at this ill about, most of the benefits go to the corporations, first of all. if you're being looking at tax brackets, the wealthiest get more benefits than others. so is there a possibility that this is a tax bill for the working class, that that message somehow comes back to haunt him? >> right. i mean, we see broadly that this tax bill is unpopular and that the overwhelming majority of the american people believe clearly the benefits go to the wealthy, as you just stated. i have to say, john, i don't know, maybe you've looked at presidents and through history as well. i can't recall a president who
5:36 pm
had a stronger relationship with his base than president trump. it just has been a remarkable relationship between his base voters. so even though some of his base voters may be middle-class folks who aren't getting the full benefit that they may have been promised on the campaign trail, i don't see over that issue alone them peeling away from president trump. >> the issue is when you get beyond that 35% or the 12% that voted for him, what happens to them, particularly when you have an historically unpopular president. he has an approval rating which is very, very low. and this tax bill polls even lower. it's at 29% approval, the last polling we've seen. >> it does. and remember, you've mentioned the health care piece to this tax bill and that clearly animated the opposition as well. democrats were able to really form a lot of their political energy this year around the health care attempts to roll back obamacare. now that a piece of that is in here, democrats can use that in
5:37 pm
their messaging in addition to sort of the class warfare that they will employ that this benefits the wealthy. here's the thing. you are right. donald trump is having a problem with some of his coalition that put him into office, independents, not his core voters that we see at rally. but part of his electoral coalition has drifted away and this bill is not going to help that problem for him. >> and there are suburban voters in new york, new jersey, connecticut, california, they didn't put him in the white house but may have received their support. many of them may see a tax increase in the next few years and that will be interesting to see how that plays out. >> that's why you see the republican members in some of those districts like in new jersey, republican congressional members are voting against the bill. >> david chalian, thank you. >> thank you. up next, an inaugural trip on a brand-new train line ending
5:38 pm
in disaster as cars full of passengers plummet below. and sarah palin's oldest son arrested in a despite with his father over a truck. shield annuities from brighthouse financial, allow you to take advantage of growth opportunities. with a level of protection in down markets. so you can head into retirement with confidence. brighthouse financial established by metlife.
5:39 pm
♪ dad promised he would teach me how to surf on our trip. ♪ when you book a flight then add a hotel you can save. ♪ three waves later, i think it was the other way around... ♪ everything you need to go. ♪ expedia.
5:40 pm
what's going on? oh hey! ♪ that's it? yeah. ♪ everybody two seconds! ♪ "dear sebastian, after careful consideration of your application, it is with great pleasure that we offer our congratulations on your acceptance..." through the tuition assistance program, every day mcdonald's helps more people go to college. it's part of our commitment to being america's best first job. ♪
5:41 pm
the energy conscious whopeople among usle? say small actions can add up to something... humongous. a little thing here. a little thing there. starts to feel like a badge maybe millions can wear. who are all these caretakers, advocates too? turns out, it's californians it's me and it's you. don't stop now, it's easy to add to the routine. join energy upgrade california and do your thing.
5:42 pm
breaking news tonight on the tragedy in washington state. there are now three confirmed fatalities in the amtrak derailment that left passenger cars dangling on to a highway this morning. more than 100 were taken to the hospital. cnn's kyung lah has more on how this horrific accident unfolded. >> emergency, emergency. emergency. we are on the ground. >> reporter: alarming words. the 911 call from the con dick for of an amtrak cascade's 501 from seattle to portland on this route. >> we were coming around the corner to take the bridge over i-5 north of nisqually and went
5:43 pm
on the ground. >> okay. are you -- is everybody okay? >> i'm still figuring that out. we've got cars everywhere and down on to the highway. >> reporter: some of the train cars came smashing down on to five cars on the ground and two semitrucks. the train included 12 cars and two engines almost all derailed. authorities said seven crew members and 77 passengers were on board. one of those riders estimated the amtrak train was traveling between 70 and 80 miles per hour when he knew something went terribly wrong. >> we felt a little bit of a jolt and then at a certain point the -- we could hear crumpling of the train car and we were catapulted into the seats in front of us. >> emergency responders transported all along i'm-5 including army medical center which took in 20 patients. the worst off and stable condition. the recovery process got slowed down because some of the train
5:44 pm
was teetering from the bridge. the mayor of lakewood washington, a city just north of the crash site, expressed grave concerns about the new train route prior to the accident and the city of lakewood actually sued the washington department of transportation over the new rail route citing safety concerns. >> don't come back when there is an accident and try to justify not putting in those safety enhancements, or you can go back now and advocate for the money to do it. >> kyung lah is on the phone with me right now. you've been talking to the madigan army medical center. what are you learning? >> reporter: most of them were sent here, john, because this hospital is just four to five miles away from the crash site. it is the closest one. so that's why so many immediately were taken here. but there were so many patients transported that they went all
5:45 pm
along the i-5 corridor as there are several hospitals that we've been checking in with. as far as madigan, 19 transported, 12 remain, 9 in serious but stable condition, 3 in fair and 5 of those 12 i just talked about, they've been admitted to the icu because their injuries are so severe. those injuries are fractures and broken bones, say the hospital. it's consistent if you're thrown at a high rate of speed, all of those people are suffering from fractures and broken bones and one other thing, john, that we found quite interesting, this is a military hospital. the doctors, though they are civilians, there are military doctors here with a unique background. they are able to respond to those large traumas, some of them who have even been in combat situations. so this hospital says that they are doing the best that they can to make sure that these patients walk out, we should stress, john, that they do not believe at this point that the injuries here are life threatening.
5:46 pm
they do believe that everyone will pull through. >> that's good news. kyung lah for us, thank you so much. joining me now is deborah hersman, former ntsb chair. thanks for being with us. from an investigative standpoint, what do you make of what we know so far? >> well, it's still really early and i think the most important thing to understand is what was going on at the time of derailment, where was the point of derailment, what speed was the train traveling and the ntsb should be able to find out the answers to most of those questions within the next 24 hours. >> when you look at the crash scene and we're seeing the pictures here, the way the cars are all piled up and a lot are disconnected from each other, does that tell you anything about what errors might have occurred here? >> you know, it doesn't. it's very typical to see at a train derailment that the cars are piled up. certainly when we see them, you
5:47 pm
know, with the speed that -- or with the energy that we can see here in this crash, it tells us they weren't going at a low speed. you always want the cars to remain upright. that's the best outcome for passengers. but in this case, falling from that bridge or going into the woods where they can hit other things, again, those are all not outcomes that you want to see, especially train cars flipped over. >> there's been a lot of talk about ptc, positive train control. can you explain exactly what that is and how that might have been able to make a difference in this crash? >> so, positive train control has been around for decades. this is not new technology. and in fact, in 2008, after 25 people were killed in a metrolink crash in southern california, congress required that all passenger lines and high hazmat lines install positive train control by 2015. and so they gave the railroad seven years to do it.
5:48 pm
congress pushed that deadline back when it became evident that many of the railroads weren't going to make it and so the concern from a safety perspective is not having positive train control, which is a gps-based system that backs up the engineer if they're fatigued, if they're distracted or incapacitated and slows or stops a train before a collision or an overspeed derailment. that technology is a lifesaver and should be on all of those routes now. >> it wasn't used here. we don't know if it was there and not implemented but it wasn't used by this train on this day. now, i do understand the track has undergone millions of dollars of improvements but it was still a track previously used occasionally for freight and military transport. could that be problematic at all? >> so it's still too early to tell if positive train control could have prevented this crash because you have to know what
5:49 pm
the cause of the derailment was. but certainly when you're looking at upgrading track, there's specific requirements that the federal railroad association has for classes of track and if you're going to operate high speed, in this case, up to 79 miles an hour passenger service, the tracks have to be inspected and have to be able to support that kind of speed of train. you can also look at the curvature of the track and look at where they might have speed limits because you can't go 79 everywhere. they're going to have lower speeds in certain parts of the track. you've got to pay attention to that as well. >> in terms of data, we have recorders and we might have a forward-facing camera here, deborah, quickly? >> yeah, very consistent in rail events. you get a recorder, there wasn't a post-crash fire. they should be able to download the data and forward-facing videos. you can see any issues with respect to the track or environmental conditions. >> deborah hersman, thanks for
5:50 pm
being with us. appreciate it. >> thank you. up nerkxt, the palin family feud. what happened when "360" continues. run, jthe power of in to tempur-pedic sleep with our 90-day trial and being the highest ranked mattress in customer satisfaction by jd power, it's easy to love. find your exclusive retailer at
5:51 pm
a wealth of information. a wealth of perspective. ♪ a wealth of opportunities. that's the clarity you get from fidelity wealth management. straightforward advice, tailored recommendations, tax-efficient investing strategies, and a dedicated advisor to help you grow and protect your wealth. fidelity wealth management.
5:52 pm
5:53 pm
a difficult weekend for sarah palin and her family. her oldest son is facing serious charges after he allegedly assaulted his father. and it was sarah palin who called police to their alaska
5:54 pm
home. "360's" randi kaye joins with more. what happened here? >> here's what we know based on the police documents we have obtained. track palin has been charged with first degree burglary and assault, plus criminal mischief. this all stems from a domestic situation in alaska that was over the weekend on saturday. according to the officer's date, it was sarah palin herself who told police their son was, quote, freaking out and was on some type of mechanics. when police arrived, todd palin had a bloody face. and track started yelling at them from the porch. apparently to get the crazy. at one point police documents show track palin crawled onto the roof, out a window, and onto the roof of the garage.
5:55 pm
>> how did officers eventually arrest him? >> after ten minutes they convinced him to come outside. they detained him out incident. police say track told them he had a few beers earlier, on. >> do we know why this fight between track and todd even occurred? >> according to the police, track said they had a disagreement about a vehicle. track stated he went to a window and at one point todd pointed a gun at him. inside track somehow got the gun away from his dad, told police had he put his dad on the ground and starting hitting him in the head. todd has his own version. he said track wanted to get a truck. according to todd palin, his son told him he was coming anyway and going to, quote, beat his assist. that's what police say todd palin got his pistol and at some point todd palin told police he
5:56 pm
decided he was not going to shoot his son. >> the whole palin family have had some trouble before, correct? >> they sure have. back in 2016 track was arrested on domestic violence-related charges. at the time he was suspected of punching his girlfriend. he took a plea deal. in 2014 the whole palin family was involved in some sort of crazy drunken brawl that happened at a party on todd palin's 50th birthday. police say they responded to a report of a verbal and physical altercation and alcohol was believed to be involved. track palin was according to police heavily intoxicated. bristol got into a fistfight with a guy on the ground. sarah palin took to facebook to defend her family at the time writing, quote, my kids defense of family makes my heart soar. >> much more on this as it comes in.
5:57 pm
coming up, a cnn exclusive. sources say president trump expects to be exonerated soon in the russia investigation, but his allies fear he will have a meltdown. the latest from the white house next. yeah!? i switched to geico and got more! more savings on car insurance!? they helped with homeowners, too! ok! plus motorcycle, boat and rv insurance! geico's got you covered! like a blanket! houston? you seeing this? geico. expect great savings and a whole lot more.
5:58 pm
(avo) but you also have a higher risk of heart attack or stroke. geico. non-insulin victoza® lowers a1c, and now reduces cardiovascular risk. victoza® lowers my a1c and blood sugar better than the leading branded pill. (avo) and for people with type 2 diabetes treating cardiovascular disease, victoza® is now approved to lower the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. and while it isn't for weight loss, victoza® may help you lose some weight. (avo) victoza® is not for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take victoza® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to victoza® or any of its ingredients. stop taking victoza® and get medical help right away if you get symptoms of a serious allergic reaction such as rash, swelling, difficulty breathing or swallowing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. so, stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area.
5:59 pm
tell your doctor your medical history. gallbladder problems have happened in some people. tell your doctor right away if you get symptoms. taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, indigestion, and constipation. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. ask your doctor about victoza®. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
6:00 pm
where we can find common ground... big enough to dance on. for a better us, donate to your local y today. the president is expecting to be exonerated in writing. this is new reporting from manu raju. sarah joins me. sarah, why is the president suddenly feeling so optimistic? >> he's certainly feeling less agitated. he's telling his friends that he expects to get a letter of chon racing from mueller's team, from the special counsel.