Skip to main content

tv   CNN Tonight With Don Lemon  CNN  January 17, 2018 8:00pm-9:00pm PST

8:00 pm
we can now simulate the exact anatomyh care, of a patient's brain before surgery. if we can do that, imagine what we can do for seizures. and if we can fix damaged heart valves without open heart surgery, imagine what we can do for an irregular heartbeat, even high blood pressure. if we can use analyze each patient's breast cancer to personalize their treatment, imagine what we can do for the conditions that affect us all. imagine what we can do for you. this is "cnn tonight." i'm don lemon. 11:00 p.m. here on the east
8:01 pm
coast. new developments tonight. chief strategist steve bannon makes a deal to talk to mueller's investigators. what will he tell mueller that he wouldn't tell the house intel committee? you heard the glowing review of trump's health, but the tests tell something different. does the president have heart disease, and is he at risk for heart attack in the next few years? we're going to talk about all of that in this hour. let's go to the latest on the robert mueller investigation. legal commentator ken cuccinelli and john flannery. thank you both for being here except for phil mudd. i'm paying you back for what you said on the break, phil. steve bannon has struck a deal with special counsel robert mueller and will not be testifying before a grand jury. instead he'll be voluntarily
8:02 pm
speaking to mueller's investigators. from a practical standpoint, ken, what is the difference here? >> from a practical standpoint, there is very little difference. this is not at all surprising. you know, if they have fbi agents present and steve bannon were to lie, that's a felony. if you're in front of a grand jury and you were to lie, that's a felony. one of the ways it can play out in person is more conversational. it's a little more stilted in front of a grand jury, and if you are taking the deposition, if you're interviewing the witness, you want to be in a conversation. you want to engage in back and forth. so there is some utility to this format on mueller's side. on bannon's side, frankly, it's just more comfortable. you don't really want to get in front of an audience like a grand jury.
8:03 pm
that -- i don't care who you are, that makes a defendant uncomfortable. and uncomfortableness can come across looking like dishonesty. of course, you never want that if you're on the hot seat. >> john is about to jump -- don't jump out of your chair, john, we need to hear from you. what did you want to say? >> i'm laughing. it sounds like we're inviting him to a tea party. i don't want to be too offensive and bob mueller is just so concerned about how the dainty mr. ban no onon will feel about. as a trial lawyer, you make a decision sometimes whether this is a truth teller or a liar. we want to be able to invoke some privilege. i think this is to find out what kind of witness he is going to be, and the reason they use the subpoena is because it is a judiciary act. if you go back to the nixon case when he didn't want to talk and reveal stuff, the supreme court decided that he had to, and in
8:04 pm
part because it was a judiciary subpoena, and in addition, it had to do with the fact that there was a criminal investigation and there was an executive order that put that executive order at odds with the white house. so this is a careful, legal setup. and think about this. if he lies in this statement to the fbi agents and then they put him in the grand jury, then the squeeze is major. i'm always amazed why public officials don't assert the fifth amendment, and i guess they can't help themselves, because i think this is a treacherous road for bannon and for the administration. >> phil, i want you to weigh in but let me ask you this can question before you do. when bannon went before the house intel committee, he was not cooperative. the committee says the white house placed a gag order on bannon. but his lawyer said he would answer questions coming from the special counsel. why cooperate with mueller but not cooperate with congress? >> i can think of a couple reasons why. number one, when you're a white house official -- i served at
8:05 pm
the white house for a while -- you're going over the legislative branch, that is, the congress, and you're saying, you want me to reveal secret conversations i had with the president. i think that's privileged. let me go real with you for a second, don. there is a second issue he won't deal with with mueller, and that is 30 seconds after he speaks at the congress, somebody is going to leak it. there are differences when he goes over to talk to robert mueller. he's talking to the executive branch. not only the executive branch, a special counsel who was appointed by the deputy attorney general who is the deputy attorney general selected by donald trump. the second thing is robert mueller doesn't leak. if i was steve bannon, i would see a huge difference between talk to go a leing to a leaking and talking to a former director. big difference, don. >> this is what cnn has learned. multiple sources told us the white house is working behind
8:06 pm
the scenes to work with congress. are they working behion leaking? >> it's almost a race to leak to capitol hill, and you don't have that in the executive branch procedure. >> that's not them interfering if they're telling his weaknesses and telling him not to cooperate? >> look, the executive privilege can be utilized as bannon did with congress. that's not something that i expect him to try to do with robert mueller, and he said as much, if i remember correctly. look, i think bannon's bigger issue is that mueller has to go through his list of talking to everybody. he was going to talk to bannon at some point, so that point is now. at least for the first time. and he could do it more than once as john noted.
8:07 pm
he could do it once in person and then once in front of a grand jury as well. but i think the more interesting issue here is that steve bannon, he speaks declaretively, he uses a lot of hyperbole like the president does. that is not a mode of communicating that is particularly helpful to someone sitting in what i've called the hot seat here. it's not accurate factually, typically, and you're not concerned about that in the political arena with hyperbole. you're trying to make a point rather than spell out facts. that's not what this counsel is about. >> if you're speaking to investigators, that's a huge problem. >> that's my point. that is a huge problem, and he is going to have to really discipline his ordinary way of communicating that's really dictated, i think, by his personality. the president ultimately is going to have to do the same thing, but bannon is the first
8:08 pm
one of that personality type. >> white house chief of staff john kelly was asked if bannon was told by the white house to use executive privilege. he said no and then he added this. >> steve has had very, very little contact with the white house since he left. i know steve a little bit, not very well. he left the white house, has certainly never returned to the white house, and with the exception of a few phone calls here and there, very little contact with the white house. and i certainly have never spoken with him since he left. >> so kelly says bannon has had very little contact with the white house. are they distancing themselves here? >> this is a cannibal society in this white house. what he said, the important thing, which would otherwise be the headline, is the president of the united states who has the executive privilege hasn't asserted it, so these people have no business asserting it because it's not their privilege. jeff sessions and others said someday he may want to assert
8:09 pm
the privilege. you interpose the privilege before someone talks, and if you haven't, they talk. they asserted executive privilege when he wasn't the executive. during the campaign they said they would answer questions. but after the election they wouldn't. he was not the executive during that transition period. and then the conversations that are not held with the president, none of those are protected, not oly because he didn't assert it but because it doesn't apply. and you have to consider whether or not they're trying to conceal crimes and privileges take flight whenever you try to conceal a crime by the conversation. we had that significant one which has been called the slip-up in which bannon is talking about the june 9 rewrite in which the president claimed all they were talking about was adoption, which was absolutely not true. and we have that from the e-mails and so forth. that's a point of focus for obstruction. so there is no surprise that bannon doesn't want to talk about it on the hill, but he had no right asserting privilege in
8:10 pm
any way or fashion, and it was all a manner of obstructing, getting access to conversations bannon had. that's what i believe. >> phil, according to access, adam schiff hammered bannon about his refusal to speak about anything else in the white house. this came 90 minutes before bannon's testimony. does that tell you anything about bannon's ability to perform during high-pressure session questions? >> no, doesn't, because there is a fundamental difference -- >> phil. >> there is a fundamental difference between the conversation he had on the hill and the conversation he had before mueller. i suspect he's going to walk before mueller and say, tell me what you want to know. i'm going to speak now because this is executive branch to executive branch. furthermore, there is a difference in the tone of the conversation between mueller and bannon and the hill conversation. mueller doesn't care about all the politics and he doesn't care
8:11 pm
about what bannon thinks. if you're a federal investigator, you have one issue you want to focus on and that is facts. who was at the meeting, and i don't care who you think was there, i want to know who you know was there. did they talk about it beforehand, did they talk about it afterwards? what do you know about further conversations with russia? it's not a conversation about did don jr. commit treason? i want to know what you heard and what you thought afterward, and when you walk into robert mueller's office, you're not on the hill anymore. you got to speak. >> i just wonder, with the folks that went in there today. there were a couple of them, corwin lewandowski probably the main one, saying i'm not prepared to answer questions, i'm not prepared to answer questions. is that a tactic where they can go back and figure it out,
8:12 pm
because the moment they said i'm not going to answer any more questions, you don't give them any more questions because they can go back to the attorney and form their answers. to say he's not prepared, doesn't know what's going on could be disingenuous. >> the dog ate my homework is the defense to not answer questions you can't answer or just say, i'm not prepared. it just doesn't wash. i think that certainly he has to remember conversations that he had. he doesn't remember all of them, he doesn't remember them perfectly and he could hem it in in different ways. they have documents they could present him with and ask him, does that refresh your recollection, does it not? i think what we're seeing is an investigation, and we already have evidence because of the comey firing and other things, that there is instruction from the highest level down through
8:13 pm
the group of cannibals that betray the instant they're on the wrong side of the equation. bannon is represented by an attorney that also represents mccann and priebus. if that's a joint defense, and that may be the only way it would work, it sort of suggests a pattern that fits, this obstruction. bannon said, if we don't hang together, we hang separately and that's what we're doing. >> i have to run. when we come back, the president's attorney denying payment for porn star's silence on sexual assault ♪
8:14 pm
8:15 pm
with expedia, you can book a flight, then add a hotel, and save. ♪ everything you need to go. expedia having mplaque psoriasise is not always easy. it's a long-distance run. and you have the determination to keep going.
8:16 pm
humira has a proven track record of being prescribed for nearly 10 years. humira works inside the body to target and help block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to symptoms. in clinical trials, most adults taking humira were clear or almost clear and many saw 75% and even 90% clearance in just four months. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal, infections and cancers, including lymphoma have happened as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. join over 250,000 people who have chosen humira. ask about the #1 prescribed biologic by dermatologists. humira & go.
8:17 pm
. the president's personal attorney denying a story that alleged a sexual relationship between trump and a porn star. at any other time, that would be what everybody is talking about. two decades ago, the monica lewinsky scandal led to bill clinton's impeachment. thanks for joining us. 20 years, michael, since your reporting of president clinton's affair with monica lewinsky and his lies about it became public. it was a bombshell. talk to us about the news and how it hit washington, d.c. >> well, it was quite the earthquake, wasn't it? >> it certainly was.
8:18 pm
>> on so many different levels. people have talked about this as, you know, i had the story, i certainly was aware of the relationship that the president, the then-president bill clinton had with monica lewinsky. but what made this a story was the decision by ken starr to launch a criminal investigation of this matter. to wire linda tripp in her conversations with monica lewinsky together, evidence to suggest that the president and his good friend verna jordan were trying to cover up the paula jones lawsuit, and that was a stunning development. >> so without ken starr, are you saying this may not have been reported? >> we at "newsweek" knew about the allegations of the relationship for months. i had been talking to linda tripp. she had provided me all sorts of circumstantial evidence,
8:19 pm
including offering to give me the blue dress, although it was not clear what i could possibly have done with it to use that corroborating evidence, but once the paula jones lawsuit proceeded and it was clear that bill clinton was going to be deposed under oath and was going to be asked about this, we got closer to the story, but it was the intervention of starr that made this the political earthquake that it was. >> and eventually the cover-up that made it a bigger political earthquake. >> and the president vehemently denied that the allegations were true. >> sally, it was epic then and eventually resulted in the president's impeachment, and you fast-forward 20 years and we have a story about president trump allegedly having a tryst with a porn star, stormy daniels. the "wall street journal" reported just this past friday on an alleged tryst that the president's attorney, michael cohen, arranged a $130,000
8:20 pm
payment for a former adult film star a month before the 2016 election as part of an agreement to preclude her from publicly discussing an alleged sexual encounter with mr. trump. why hasn't the public responed the same way? this is someone who is now the president of the united states, was married, had a small child and is accused of covering it up in some way. why isn't this a big story? >> you know why? because i think that this comes very low. with bill clinton, and i have to say that michael coffman did a good job reporting on monica lewinsky and i was hanging over his shoulder while he was doing it. during that time, it wasn't a shock that bill clinton was
8:21 pm
having an affair, because we already knew he was doing that, but it was a shock when it became clear that he was going to be deposed and then he lied. but i think with donald trump, first of all, everybody knows that this is what he does, and i think that he has -- it was a consensual affair. i don't think any money changed hands at the time, at least that we know of now. and i think that the only thing that is going to get in the way is the money, follow the money. where did they get the money to pay her off to keep her silent? why did they wait so long? how was it done? but that part of it, i think, could be difficult. but i think that when you look at what trump has done with the environment and what he's done with daca and what he has done with health care and what he's doing with the immigration and
8:22 pm
racism -- you know, you could go on and on and on. >> you think this just falls in there. >> this just falls at the bottom, and the trump supporters, their -- >> it doesn't matter. they don't care about anything. there is no indiscretion, there's nothing. you mentioned kenneth starr. would something like this possibly turn up at the mueller investigation? >> you know, not on its face. i mean, with the monica lewinsky thing, she was a subpoenaed witness in the paula jones lawsuit. remember, the supreme court voted 9-0 and said the lawsuit should go forward. it was a legitimate legal process. and that's what turns it, you know, turned it into -- >> michael cohen denies there is any inappropriate relationship with stormy daniels, and cohen also released a statement in which she denies having sex with the president. so why do you think this story hasn't blown up? >> first of all, they did not
8:23 pm
deny the $130,000 payment. that's what leapt out at me. if nothing had happened, why did money change hands? and if money didn't change hands, why didn't they deny that money had changed hands? so that's the first sort of red flag that leaps out. of course, as stormy daniels had talked to others and confirmed that she had had a sexual relationship with donald trump and then after the $130,000 payment, she said she did not have a sexual relationship with donald trump. so there are legitimate reasons to be somewhat skeptical about some of these public statements. >> i think you were saying discrepancies. >> listen, this president, everybody knows he has a problem with the truth. bill clinton was impeached for lying about his affair.
8:24 pm
do you think there is a different standard with this president? i don't have a lot of time left. >> suppose this happened with barack obama. it would be a huge scandal and he probably would have been forced to resign. >> media would have been all over it. >> i don't think melania would leave him over this, i don't think she would care. his supporters are, number one, if it's ever been shown that he was behind an abortion of someone that he'd had sex with or, two, that if he were gay or a cross-dresser. i think that other than that, he's golden. >> thank you. that is like -- what is it? a live boy or dead girl? thank you very much. interesting. when we come back, the president's doctor telling the country this about his health. >> his overall health is excellent. he has very, very good health.
8:25 pm
he is in the excellent range from a cardiac standpoint. >> but it turns out president trump's tests show he has heart disease, so why didn't his doctor say that during his briefing? and had twin boys. but then one night, a truck didn't stop. but thanks to our forester, neither did our story. and that's why we'll always drive a subaru. pssst. what? i switched to geico and got more. more savings on car insurance? a-ha. and an award-winning mobile app. that is more. oh, there's more. mobile id cards, emergency roadside service... more technology.
8:26 pm
i can even add a new driver... ...right from her phone! geico. expect great savings and a whole lot more. if sleep is essential to happiness. what's essential to sleep? introducing the leesa mattress. a better place to sleep. expertly designed for support, pressure relief, cooling and bounce. read our reviews then try the leesa mattress in your own home. sleep on it for 100 nights and love it
8:27 pm
or get a full refund. order now and get $100 off. go to today.
8:28 pm
8:29 pm
press secretary sarah sanders standing by the assessment of the white house's position that president trump is in excellent health. >> he is the only doctor that has weighed in on this matter that has actually examined the president, so i think a doctor that has spent the amount of time with the president as dr. jackson has is not only the most qualified but the only credible source when it comes to diagnosing any health concerns. >> so i want to talk about this now with chief medical correspondent dr. sanjay gupta and arthur kaplan, head of medical ethics at new york university school of medicine. good to have you both on. dr. gupta, you were at the briefing, and based on the information this doctor presented, does president trump have heart disease? >> yeah, he appears to have a common form of heart disease that was diagnosed on a bunch of the different tests that he had
8:30 pm
done. it was a three and a half hour exam done at walter reed. given his age, focusing on the heart makes perfect sense and i think that was the majority of the exam. there is a specific test that is a cat scan that looks at the blood vessels that lead to the heart known as the coronaries trying to figure out if there is some disease within those blood vessels, some heart disease. i asked dr. jackson specifically about that. he did not talk about this cat scan being done until the further questioning. take a listen. >> he does not have heart disease. >> you had a ct scan before that showed capillaries in his blood vessels. >> he did. so technically he has non-clinical cardiosclerosis. he had a coronary calcium score
8:31 pm
done in 2009 that was 91. he had a calcium score in 2013 that was 98. he had one done this time that was 133. >> and that number 133 is important, because really anything over 100 does indicate some level of heart disease. the doctor did say, look, he has coronary atherosclerosis when i asked about heart disease. coronary atherosclerosis is that plaque that's building up, that hardening of the arteries. if you're over 40 in america, i probably have heart disease, you probably do as well. but that's why these tests are done, to figure out if you have it, to what degree you have it and to look at potentially what you can do about it. >> when you watched that response from the doctor, what
8:32 pm
did you think? >> i thought sanjay nailed him. he was not telling all that he knew about the health status of donald trump, and this was like the good news award. super healthy, fit for duty, everything is great, looking wonderful. so we didn't get the absolute square, honest truth here that the president does have kind of, you know, a heart risk. >> so what are the ethics around characterizing the president's health as excellent if there are, indeed, issues? >> well, it's a reminder of two things, don. first, there is a conflict of interest. the guy is an admiral. he's working for the commander in chief. the president gets to say what's disclosed. there's no obligation for him to say anything. second, once you go off and say, look, i'm going to be open and honest with you, you have to be honest in all regards. it is unethical to hold pertinent information like that. that's not the right thing to do. >> dr. gupta, you did a documentary of your knowledge of
8:33 pm
heart attacks. it looks at the science of heart disease prevention. president trump is 71 years old, as we said. is there anything unusual about having these kinds of tests done that we know he's had two other times, in 2009 and 2013? it's not unusual, right? >> it's not unusual to have this test done. it's more common in the last decade since the president had the first test done. >> what about the difference in the numbers? we can put it up again. >> yeah, the numbers have definitively gone up, 34, 98 and 133. the numbers are expected to go up in most people, because as i said, we all develop some degree of this plaque, this hardening of the arteries. and with time it typically does get worse in people. but not in everybody. if it can be treated successfully, oftentimes you can stall the worsening of that plaque. >> if i can jump in just for a second on sanjay's comment, one
8:34 pm
of the things i was bothered by was there was a suggestion you can eat two big macs and three fish sandwiches a night, never exercise and wind up to be sort of the healthiest person ever to occupy the oval office. that's a bad message to send to the american people. it isn't true. you have to modify your lifestyle. these numbers show if he's going to control this condition, he's got to make changes in his lifestyle. so putting aside what does it mean to him being president, is he going to drop dead of a heart attack, we look to him in a certain sense, and if he says, look, you know, eat what you want, don't do anything, never exercise, that's not the right message to send to a nation that has, shall we say, weight problems. >> sanjay, that was my question as i was watching all of this. we say it's not unusual for this to happen, but considering our diets, a lot of people in this country struggle with their weight. i am one of them -- >> you do? >> -- i'm sure you gentlemen have as well. but that doesn't mean you're healthy if you eat a couple big macs a day and diet cokes, and
8:35 pm
if you have any of these conditions, it's incumbent to be honest about it. my diet could be better, and i'm concerned about these things and we're going to work on them. >> it's a good point. going into that press conference, art really summarized it well. he was characterized as having excellent health. excellent health. he's a guy who has borderline obesity. he's a guy who has cholesterol and bad cholesterol levels rising despite being on medications. he's a guy that has heart disease. these are not common problems. these are problems that as an individual and a society we need to do a better job addressing. that's not excellent health. >> right. if you watch that press conference -- listen, not to criticize the doctor, but i was like, maybe he could run a marathon. speaking of that, there was some raised eyebrows about the president's height and his weight, because as we gentlemen are getting older and you go to
8:36 pm
the doctor and he says, well, you're still 6 feet tall or 5'11" or whatever you are, has your weight changed? sometimes they put you on the scale, sometimes they don't. the president says he weighs 235 pounds. do you get any leeway with these numbers exactly? because an obesity diagnosis is maybe a pound or two off, and is that necessarily unethical? >> well, i think -- look, the difference between a physical and an assessment of fitness for duty is that in the physical, it's for your benefit, you control it. this gentleman knows trump pretty well. he told us that, he sees him a lot, he talks to him a lot. i think it's fair to say there is going to be a little spin and is a little generosity exercised about some aspects of his height, perhaps his weight. i don't know that, but yeah, again, i keep coming back to if we wanted an assessment of trump or anybody as fit for president, we would have an independent
8:37 pm
group of doctors do it, sort of have his insiders do it as a physical, and you're going to generate conflict. >> dr. gupta, i give you the last word here. what's the takeaway. >> because it is for the benefit of the patient, sometimes it's self-reported when it comes to height and weight. they may not even ask you your height and weight assuming you take these measurements yourself. the president is representative afri of a lot of americans. he's sort of right in the middle for his risk of heart disease and future heart problems. but there is something he could do about it. it sort of makes it seem like there is nothing to be done. there are things that can be done, even reversing some of this heart disease and a lot of people are looking at the story and saying, that sounds a lot about me. you don't have to have a heart problem down the road. that's not something that's p
8:38 pm
preordained for you. it's the house versus president trump. we'll show you how the house is fighting back against the trump administration policies. mine's way better. this one's below market price and has bluetooth. same here, but this one has leather seats! use the app to compare price, features and value.
8:39 pm
looking for a hotel that fits... whoooo. ...your budget? tripadvisor now searches over... ...200 sites to find you the... ...hotel you want at the lowest price. grazi, gino! find a price that fits. tripadvisor. that's why feeling safe is priceless. with adt, you can feel safe with an adt starter kit professionally installed for only $49.00. call today, and install an adt starter kit that includes security panel, keypad, key fob, entry and motion sensors and for a limited time, get a camera included and installed at no additional cost. that's a $449.00 value, installed, for just $49.00.
8:40 pm
adt has over 140 years of security experience, with our commitment to customer service, and round-the- clock professional monitoring, you have the comfort of knowing that adt is helping to protect what matters most. call today, or visit to get your adt starter kit installed for just $49.00. adt. we help keep you safe, so you can feel secure. call 1-888-337-safe or visit and get your adt starter kit for just $49.00.
8:41 pm
we can now simulate the exact anatomyh care, of a patient's brain before surgery. if we can do that, imagine what we can do for seizures. and if we can fix damaged heart valves without open heart surgery, imagine what we can do for an irregular heartbeat, even high blood pressure. if we can use analyze each patient's breast cancer to personalize their treatment, imagine what we can do for the conditions that affect us all. imagine what we can do for you.
8:42 pm
california has the largest population of nearly 40 million people. it often talks about political and social issues and we remind you of that as they fight trump policies. >> reporter: the california public versus president trump. one year into his administration -- >> trump is a wake-up call. >> reporter: -- the world's sixth largest economy fighting trump administration policies on everything from legal marijuana to taxes to the environment. >> california is not waiting for trump. we're not waiting for all the deniers. >> reporter: and the escalating fight over immigration. >> we're fighting immigration and we're going to win. >> reporter: a new law limiting
8:43 pm
cooperation between local, state and federal law enforcement, prank road signs welcomed drivers to seemingly another country, the land of illegals. >> if the politicians in california don't want to protect their communities, then i.c.e. will. >> i.c.e. said politicians who deny the law should be held accountable. did you see the world like it is today? >> there are policies that are radical departures from the norm. california will fight those. >> the immigrant community finding its voice in the era of trump. >> we're actually working harder and galvanizing more people. >> reporter: a daughter of mexican immigrants east l.a.
8:44 pm
advocates say the president's policies have only emboldened her community. >> this is a movement that will not be stopped. the president cannot win. he may be there now, but he's not going to be there forever. we're going to win. >> reporter: equally galvanized the entertainment industry with its deep pockets and powerful voice. >> the power of an idea to change the way people think and change the way people feel is really what's important, that's really what we're fighting for. >> jeremy zimmer, ceo of united talent agency, one of the world's largest, says trump represents a threat to the idea of america. >> we all see that the freedoms and the life we assume we have, the incredible privileges we have to be, you know, raised in this country, to live in this country, we all see that, you know, how fragile it can be. >> allison, hi. >> cheryl conte, an activist in the tech community, says it is a
8:45 pm
fight over principles. >> i think you're going to find californians be completely unapologetic about fighting for what we see as california values. >> reporter: working from home on her pedal desk, one foot soldier among millions across the golden state countering, resisting trump. to give you a sense of where things are between washington, d.c. and california right now, donald trump is the first president since eyisenhower not to visit the golden state his first year in office. the activists i spoke to say over the next year the focus will be those midterm elections, not only seats here in california with all that money here in california, all that organization and all of those skills, those technical skills, all of that will be focused on races here in the state and across the country. don? >> thank you, miguel. when we come back, the former mayor of los angeles and current candidate for governor
8:46 pm
will join me. we're going to get his take on all of this. it has lutein, zeaxanthin, and omega-3. ocuvite. be good to your eyes. for her compassion and care. he spent decades fighting to give families a second chance. but to help others, they first had to protect themselves. i have afib. even for a nurse, it's complicated... and it puts me at higher risk of stroke. that would be devastating. i had to learn all i could to help protect myself. once i got the facts, my doctor and i chose xarelto®. xarelto®... to help keep me protected. once-daily xarelto®, a latest-generation blood thinner... ...significantly lowers the risk of stroke in people with afib not caused by a heart valve problem. it has similar effectiveness to warfarin. xarelto® works differently. warfarin interferes with at least 6 blood-clotting factors. xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor interacting with less of your body's natural blood-clotting function.
8:47 pm
for afib patients well-managed on warfarin, there is limited information on how xarelto® compares in reducing the risk of stroke. don't stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase risk of stroke. while taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. it may increase your risk of bleeding if you take certain medicines. xarelto® can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. get help right away for unexpected bleeding, unusual bruising, or tingling. if you've had spinal anesthesia, watch for back pain or any nerve or muscle-related signs or symptoms. do not take xarelto® if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. tell your doctor before all planned medical or dental procedures... ...and before starting xarelto®-about any conditions, such as kidney, liver, or bleeding problems. it's important to learn all you can... help protect yourself from a stroke. talk to your doctor about xarelto®. there's more to know™.
8:48 pm
8:49 pm
many californians marking president trump's first year in office by doubling down on their efforts to fight his administration's policies on key issues like immigration and the
8:50 pm
environment. i want to talk about this now with antonio viagosa, candidate for governor of california, who is also the former mayor of los angeles. good to see you. >> good to be here. >> is the state of california at war with president trump? >> i think it's the other way around. he's at war with california, new york, blue states. seems to be at war with virtually everyone in this country. there's a civil war in his own white house. unlike president unlike preside during the civil yara tempted to be a uniter, spoke about bringing the nation together, this is a man who spends virtually every single day dividing americans one against another, and frankly, it's an abomination. i've never seen anything like it. >> you mentioned president
8:51 pm
lincoln . let's mention president eisenhower, dwight eyes now because he's the first president since eisenhower who didn't visit california, the largest democratic state, i should say, during his year in office. has the interrupt administration, do you think he's single out or that administration is single out california? >> i think it's pretty clear. whether it's offshore drilling where he's given an exception to florida but not california, whether it's the home mortgage deduction, which he capped, whether it's state and local taxes which he's also capped, he's focused on our policies around immigration, health care, the environment. yes, i think it's pretty clear, he's made it absolutely clear that he's going to do everything he can to punish california. and, frankly, it's not going to work. we're going to take a page out
8:52 pm
of governor perry's book. we'll use the tenth amendment, the courts to stand up for california values, values that i used to think were american values. but he seems to think another way. >> well, let's talk about the reason -- one of the reasons you're running. governor brown is popular there. he served two terms, can't run again. you're going to announce you're going to run for governor on the california/mexico border in contrast with the wall that insulated mexicans, tack a and immigration. they're personal for you, i know. how do you plan to take on this president? >> well, they are personal to me. and i think they're personal to many people, not just because my family came here from mexico a hundred years ago. these people are human beings. the contrast you mentioned in my
8:53 pm
video announcing my candidacy was a contrast different than donald trump who called mexicans criminals and rapists. they're human beings. that's why we were putting water there at the border. some 10,000 mexicans and people crossing the border have died crossing the border. a little known fact since the 1990s. i think it's important, it's not just important to me. i think it's important to people here in california, the most diverse state, a state that has benefited greatly from immigration, a state that welcomes newcomers, and a state, by the way, that has -- is the 6th largest economy in the world, in no small part because we trade with china, mexico, the pacific rim, and latin america. so, a lot of what you see coming out of the white house actually goes against the grain of what most of us here value as
8:54 pm
californians and as americans. >> if you win, you'll be the first latino governor of that state, hispanic latino community makes up 40% of california's -- of california. they contribute greatly to the state. if a daca deal is not reached, would you defy the trump administration and refuse to deport dreamers? >> we're not going to deport any dreamers. the federal government has that responsibility. i think we should go even further than we have. i believe able to come into a public office, a hospital, university, a school, any public office -- state office without a warrant for a specific individual. you know what, a lot of what they're doing and highlighting is they're trying to terrorize people by going into a courthouse, an unemployment line in the way that they do. and, so, i think california is going to mark its own path.
8:55 pm
you're right, they do have responsibility over immigration. but we have our own values and values that we tend -- intend to stand up for. >> you call the president's decision to phase out daca arguably racist. the president is now having to defend himself against comments he made about haiti, african nations. what did you make of these comments? >> i don't think any of us have ever heard a president of the united states speak about people in that way so racially charged. the idea that people who come from africa or central america are somehow not good enough to be americans goes against the grain of everything we've ever learned. and it goes against the grain of the facts. l.a. has a lot of people who have come from africa. l.a. has -- is the epicenter of people who come from latin
8:56 pm
america. they've come here, they work here, they dream here. they want the same things people want who come from other parts of the world. and the notion that some of us are better because we come from europe, as an example, is just -- it goes against the grain of everything i've ever learned and i've believed about this great country that i love and that i'm willing to fight for. >> antonio villa regoso, good luck on your campaign. >> thank you, don, it's good to talk to you and be on your show. >> thanks for watching. i'll see you right back here tomorrow.
8:57 pm
♪ i thought i was managing my moderate to severe crohn's disease. then i realized something was missing... me. my symptoms were keeping me from being there. so, i talked to my doctor and learned humira is for people who still have symptoms of crohn's disease after trying other medications. and the majority of people on humira saw significant symptom relief and many achieved remission in as little as 4 weeks. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira.
8:58 pm
with humira, remission is possible. but birds eye made it deliciousfrom zucchini.a. mmm... mashed potatoes...and rice! but made from cauliflower. looks like i need a fork! oh no. (giggles) birds eye veggie made. so veggie good.
8:59 pm
we know life can be hectic. that's why, at xfinity, we've been working hard to simplify your experiences with us. now, with instant text and email updates, you'll always be up to date.
9:00 pm
you can easily add premium channels, so you don't miss your favorite show. and with just a single word, find all the answers you're looking for - because getting what you need should be simple, fast, and easy. download the xfinity my account app or go online today. good evening. tonight keeping him honest on immigration, the border wall and how the white house was reportedly directing what steve bannon did and did not answer in front of congress. at the very moment when reaching a deal on immigration could determine whether the entire government shuts down, president trump's own chief of staff john kelly speaks out on candidate trump's central campaign promise to build a wall on the southern border and what he said may not surprise you, but the fact that he said it will. candidate trump's pledge on the wall was uninformed. we are joined tonight by one of many lawmakers who were actua


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on