happening now, breaking news. surprise announcement. president trump throws a curveball at reporters promising an announcement that could impact the nuclear standoff from north korea. will it live up to the president's hype? we're going to tell you what we're learning this hour. trade warpath. president trump defies many global and political allies by public publicly running on to new tariffs. after days of high-level protests, is mr. trump's policy any less controversial or confusing tonight? quiet stormy? as the porn star sues the president, we're told that the president is upset about his spokeswoman's response to the scandal. has member of the president's own team put him in greater legal jeopardy? and a top democrat wants to force the president's former campaign manager to talk after corey lewandowski refused to

answer some key questions in the russia investigation. this is "the situation room". >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >> breaking tonight, that so-called major announcement on north korea that president trump says will happen very soon. it's not clear if it will be an important advancement or a sudden distraction. it comes as the president takes the next step toward launching a possible trade war while also facing new fallout from his alleged affair with a porn star. this hour, i'll talk with a former defense secretary, leon panetta, and our senior legal analyst, preet bharara, and our correspondents and analysts, they are all standing by. first, let's go to our chief white house correspondent, jim acosta. jim, what can you tell us about this announcement on north korea we anticipate fairly soon? >> reporter: wolf, i think we've

gone from fire and fury to fast and furious, at least that's how the developments are happening over here at the white house. we had a very surprise visit in the briefing room not too long ago. i think you have some of the pictures of the president. he basically surprised everybody in the room when he said that there's an announcement coming up at 7:00 this evening on south korea and my understanding, from talking to a senior administration official, in just the last few minutes, and some of our other colleagues who are also reporting this, that the south koreans are expected to make the announcement in the briefing room and my understanding from talking to a senior administration official, wolf, is that this announcement will be about the south koreans and their recent dialogue with the north koreans about denuclearizing pyongyang and so we'll be looking for that at 7:00. as to whether or not the president will make another visit to the briefing room, i did talk to another senior administration official who said, i don't want to get ahead of the president. that could or could not mean that the president may be coming

back in. we don't think that's going to happen, but we should hold that out as a possibility. but as you know, wolf, and you just described this a few moments ago, it's been sort of fly by the seat of our pants all week long over here at the white house. that goes for the president, too, as he's dealing with a number of issues from tariffs to stormy daniels to the russia investigation. >> reporter: it's been a taxing week for president trump, who signed a proclamation initiating new tariffs on steel and aluminum imports coming into the u.s., a move that's likely to spark a trade backlash from american allies. >> steel is steel. you don't have steel, you don't have a country. >> it was not fair. >> reporter: earlier in the day, the president took note of collateral damage caused by his new tariffs, the sudden resignation of his top economic adviser, gary cohn, a fierce critic of free trade policies, mr. trump made fun at cohn, who strongly opposed the tariffs, describing his outgoing aide as a globalist. >> he might be a globalist, but i still like him. he's seriously a globalist, there's no question. but you know what, in his own

way, he's a nationalist, because he loves our country. and where is gary? you love our country. >> reporter: but for all of his tough talk, the president signaled that he is making exceptions and applying some tariffs. >> we're negotiating with canada and the nafta and depending on whether or not we reach a deal, also very much involved with that is national defense, but if we reach a deal, it's most likely that we won't be charging those two countries tariffs. >> reporter: a much softer tone than he had last week. >> people have no idea that our country has been treated. they've destroyed the steel industry, they've destroyed the aluminum industry. >> reporter: but the president is unleashing some of his fury behind the scenes, venting that he is not happy that press secretary sarah sanders confirmed that he's been in arbitration with porn star stormy daniels, who alleges that she had an affair with mr. trump. >> the arbitration was won in the president's favor.

>> reporter: white house officials pushed back on that, with insisting the president has no issues with sanders. democrats are taking note of the lack of dpgop outrage over the stormy story. >> you can be sure if any of that were happening with the democrats, the republicans would be very involved in it. but our time should be spent making the future better for the american people. >> reporter: is white house is also grappling with the president's loose talk in the russia investigation. a white house official confirmed a report in "the new york times" that the president has discussed the probe with former chief of staff priebus and white house council don mcgahn after they spoke with the special counsel's office. an official told cnn that chief of staff john kelly has wandrne the president to be careful, saying it's pretty clear that kelly admonishes constantly and he's not the only one. >> sending the message not only those that have been questioned, but those that may be questioned in the future, that what they said would be commented on or they would be queried by the president, that's not a good practice. i think john kelly's advice is

sound advice. >> reporter: now, getting back to those tariffs. we should note, wolf, a number of republicans, including jeff flake from arizona, orrin hatch over there in the senate, they're both talking about perhaps moving some legislation in the coming weeks to nullify some of these tariffs coming from the trump administration. so this battle over tariffs is not over yet. but getting back to the startling announcement that we got from the president just in the last hour in the briefing room, we do expect to see a member of the south korean delegation in the briefing room at 7:00 this evening to make this announcement. we expect it to be about their ongoing talks with the north koreas, to denuclearize the north korean program there in pyongyang. and i spoke to a north korean official who didn't want to give too many details, but described the talks between the south koreans and the north koreans as interesting. understatement, perhaps, of the day. >> a leader of the south korean delegation will be making the

delegati declaration. he was among those that met with kim jong-un, the north korean leader. jim acosta, thanks very much. there's more breaking news right now involving stormy daniels' legal battle against the president and his lawyer. let's go to our senior investigative correspondent, drew griffin, who is working this part of the story for us. drew, you've been poring over all the doumcument, all the conflicting statements. what have you found? >> reporter: the news comes from that nondisclosure agreement, wolf, that stormy daniels and michael cohen signed. stormy daniels said she told four people about her alleged affair with donald trump. one of them is a woman named angel ryan. angel ryan is a porn actress herself. in october of 2016, she came forward in a news conference and described an unwanted sexual advance by donald trump that she says took place at that very same golf tournament in 2006, where donald trump allegedly began his affair with porn actress, stormy daniels.

at the time, drake says she was asked to trump's hotel room where he grabbed her and kissed her and other women without asking. he later invited her back for a private dinner, which she declined. and in a phone call, she said either trump or someone representing trump, offered her $10,000 and use of a private jet if she would accept. the trump campaign at the time said mr. trump does not know this person, does not remember this person, and would have no interest in knowing her. well, now we know, wolf, just six days later, that person was named in a nondisclosure agreement being written up by donald trump's attorney, michael cohen. all of this being revealed today, as donald trump's legal team continues to try to figure out just how they can keep stormy daniels quiet. with details of the alleged affair, the pre-election payment, and even the acknowledgement from white house press secretary, sarah sanders, that the president was involved -- >> i can share that the arbitration was won in the president's favor. >> reporter: -- president trump and his private attorney,

michael cohen, find themselves caught in a perfect storm of their own making. legally, their next move could be to enforce the nondisclosure agreement to silence stormy daniels by bringing her to court. but bringing her to court would risk revealing all the sordid details in public. they are stuck. legal experts say cohen's mistakes include admitting he facilitated payment to stormy daniels, whose real name is stephanie clifford, for $130,000, drawing up a sloppy, now-public nondisclosure agreement, missing donald trump's signature, and sending the payment through a secretive delaware corporation that has his own name attached to it. all of this has, according to clifford's new attorney, made the rush to silence his client before the election look like a legal hack job. >> the way that this was handled and the documentation, quite honestly, this was amateur hour, anderson. this is very, very sloppy, it's

very, very messy. it is shocking, quite honestly, that something of this magnitude was handled in this way, in the waning days of the 2016 presidential election. >> reporter: the legal fight to ensue between president trump, michael cohen, and a porn actress, amounts to a contract dispute between private parties. the bigger picture, and perhaps bigger storm, now focuses on what the president knew and when. campaign finance watchdog attorney paul ryan says the just-filed lawsuit provides a trail of allegations that the president knew of the plan to keep stephanie clifford silent. >> we have stephanie clifford in a legal filings in court saying donald trump initiated and directed all of this. so that's the first important fact. second new important factual allegation, that the whole purpose of this allegation, donald trump's purpose for engaging in these negotiations was to help ensure his victory in the 2016 election. >> reporter: according to the complaint, filed by common cause

with the federal elections commission and the u.s. department of justice, that $130,000 undisclosed payment amounts to an illegal campaign contribution or expenditure. in other words, a crime. >> if this fec does not investigate, and that's all we're asking for, and does not open an investigation into this matter, this fec is hopeless. >> reporter: but as you know, wolf, the federal election commission is well known for its lack of investigating just about anything and in its current political makeup, it's almost a certainty this case will go nowhere. trump's attorney, michael cohen, in the past has called the complaint by common cause baseless, along with the allegation that president trump filed a false report to the fec. wolf? >> all right, drew, thank you. drew griffin reporting. in the russia investigation tonight, a top democrat is urging a subpoena of a former trump campaign manager. we're talking about corey lewandowski, after he refused to answer some key questions from the house intelligence committee. we're following multiple new

threads this hour on the hill, in court, and behind the scenes in the special counsel's russia probe. let's bring in our justice correspondent, jessica schneider. j jessica, tell us more about corey lewandowski's appearance today. >> reporter: wolf, this was the second time that corey lewandowski went behind closed doors with the house intelligence committee. it's also the second time that some lawmakers left dissatisfied. in fact, the top democrat, adam schiff, he addressed all of the topics that lewandowski wouldn't touch, including the june 2016 trump tower meeting, and the firing of fbi director, james comey. >> reporter: former trump campaign manager, corey lewandowski, refusing to answer certain questions in his second meeting behind closed doors with the house intelligence committee, explaining he'd answered, quote, all relevant questions. >> that's for them to decide, but i think after 12 hours, i've done enough. >> reporter: but the committee's top democrat wants him to come back, saying lewandowski can't pick and choose which questions he wanted to answer. >> these included questions about the production of the

false statement concerning the trump tower meeting, questions about the firing of james comey and conversations about that, as well as any discussions that mr. lewandowski had with the president about the potential of firing bob mueller. >> reporter: former trump campaign chairman paul manafort back in court, this time in virginia, pleading not guilty to 18 counts of bank fraud and tax crimes. manafort has maintained his innocence in special counsel robert mueller's investigation, even as his former co-defendant and campaign defendant, rick gates, pleaded guilty to separate charges as part of a paraleg plea deal, two weeks ago. mueller's team is also talking to middle east specialist, george nader, cnn has learned, as interest intensifies around a secret meeting in the seychelles islands just days before president trump's inauguration. nader was there when blackwater private security firm founder and trump associate, eric prince, met with officials from the united arab emirates and later was present when prince

talked with krill dmeetrev, at the hotel bar. it's unclear whether nader was involved in that conversation. "the washington post" reports that mueller has gathered evidence that the meeting was an effort to establish a back-channel between the incoming administration and the kremlin. >> it makes it seem like they're trying to make deals before he becomes the president. and he doesn't speak for the country before he becomes the president. >> reporter: now, democrats are calling for clarification on testimony about the seychelles meeting eric prince gave the committee in november. prince denied it was an attempt to set up secret communications between the trump administration and russia and did not reveal that george nader was there. >> if those reports aren't accurate, there's clearly a significant discrepancy between that version and what we heard in erik prince's testimony, which is accurate, i don't know, and we should find out. but clearly, both can't be true. >> reporter: congressman adam schiff wants prince to reappear

before the committee and hand over more documents. schiff also wants nader to testify. this as "the new york times" reports the president asked two key witnesses in mueller's investigation what they told the special counsel's team. the president reportedly asked former chief of staff, reince priebus, if investigators had been nice to him. and talked to white house counsel don mcgahn about his disclosure that the president asked him to fire the special counsel, robert mueller, even asking an aide to get mcgahn to release a statement that it wasn't true. talking to witnesses isn't illegal, but it may raise more questions in the possible obstruction of justice piece of the probe. >> it makes it more likely that the time he took those actions, he was thinking the same thing, let's get this thing off the rails. to me, it's another piece of evidence for obstruction. >> and when it comes to corey lewandowski's appearance before the house intelligence committee today, now congressman schiff wants republicans to issue corey lewandowski a subpoena to come back. it's something republicans will only say they'll take under

advisement. of course, republicans have signaled they're ready for this probe to end, while democrats say there are still more witnesses to be called. and of course, wolf, democrats now want corey lewandowski to come back. he was only there for about three hours today. they say he just didn't do a sufficient job answering the questions they asked. >> jessica schneider with that report. thank you very much. let's get some more on all of the stories breaking tonight. leon panetta is joining us. the former defense secretary, the former cia director. thanks so much, mr. secretary, for joining us. >> nice to be with you, wolf. >> so based on the developments you've seen, that we've all seen so far, what are you anticipate from the president telling us there will be a major announcement by the south korean delegation on north korea coming up fairly soon? >> well, wolf, from out here, 3,000 miles away from washington, it looks like another version of the keystone cops going on at the white

house. and it would be funny if it was not so serious, in terms of its implications. particularly with regards to the trade war that's going to start. but also the issues related to north korea and south korea pip mean, i think that there's no question here that south korea has been pursuing with the north koreans an effort to try to establish some kind of negotiations with regards to the whole issue of nuclear proliferation, and they seem to be making some good progress. so i would not be surprised if the announcement relates to that set of negotiations. but the real question that concerns me is whether or not the united states and all of this chaos that's going on at the white house has established any kind of strategy as to what the position of the united states will be, should those negotiations proceed.

>> that's a good point. cnn has learned, mr. secretary, that this south korean delegation hand-delivered a letter from the north korean leader, kim jong-un, to the white house for president trump and that could be significant. the south korean delegation, the leaders, they actually met with kim jong-un. what do you make of that? a message from kim jong-un to president trump. >> well, it's obviously been very interesting to watch kim jong-un begin to act like a diplomat and trying to establish these negotiations. i think the way he handled the issue with regards to the olympics, his willingness to participate in that, and now his willingness to engage in negotiations and include, as you've said, a letter to the president of the united states tells me that, you know, there is an opportunity here for the

president, south korea, and north korea to be able to sit down and at least begin the process of negotiations. i hope the president takes advantage of that. i hope the president responds to kim jong-un in an effective way. so that, hopefully, the world can breathe a sigh of relief here, if these negotiations can bek begin in earnest. >> let's see what this south korean announcement is. let's turn, in the meantime, mr. secretary, to the president's announcement today on new tariffs. are you surprised that there hasn't been more pushback from congress? >> well, obviously, i expect that those who are critical of this decision, as they should be, because what the president's announcement means today, in real terms, is that we're -- we are now going to open up a whole

trade war, with countries across the world. there's no question that those countries are going to retaliate, that as a result of that, the prices are going to go up in this country, industries are going to be impacted, jobs are going to be impacted. the americans are going to have to pay a tax as a result of these tariffs. that the president is implementing. and it would seem important now that the congress take steps to make clear that we need to have, not tariffs, but negotiations, if we're ever going to resolve the issue of fair trade. that's the only place that's going to take place. history has told us, whether it was smoot-hawley tariffs in the early '30s, whether it was the tariffs that president bush placed on the steel industry when he was in office, that it all backfires. and these tariffs that the president announced today are going to backfire as well.

at some point, we have to understand that the only way to deal with these issues is through negotiation, not through tariffs. >> let me get your thoughts on another sensitive issue that's brewing right now. the white house is trying to explain why the president's personal lawyer paid $130,000 to the porn star only a few days before the 2016 presidential election. do you believe members of congress should be investigating this? >> well, i don't think there's any questions that the issues have been raised here, with regards to the potential violation of law, campaign laws, that could have been involved here. and if that is the case, then i think it ought to be investigated. whether it's investigated by the congress or whether it's investigated by the fbi, the issue should be investigated to determine whether or not there was a violation of law.

this does involve the president of the united states. it's, frankly, a kind of repulsive situation all the way around. but, we need to find out what the truth is. and the only way you're going to find out the truth is if there is an effective and proper investigation of this matter. >> secretary panetta, thanks so much for joining us. >> thank you, wolf. just ahead, where does the stormy daniels scandal go from here? i'll ask a former u.s. attorney. we're talking about preet bharara, about that, and the legal risks for the president. and we'll have more on the breaking news in the russia probe and the threat of a new subpoena for a former trump campaign manager, corey lewandowski. mitzi: psoriatic arthritis tries to get in my way? watch me. ( ♪ ) mike: i've tried lots of things for my joint pain. now? watch me. ( ♪ ) joni: think i'd give up showing these guys how it's done? please. real people with active psoriatic arthritis

are changing the way they fight it. they're moving forward with cosentyx. it's a different kind of targeted biologic. it's proven to help people find less joint pain and clearer skin. don't use if you are allergic to cosentyx. before starting cosentyx you should be checked for tuberculosis. an increased risk of infections and lowered ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms of an infection. or if you have received a vaccine, or plan to. if you have inflammatory bowel disease tell your doctor if symptoms develop or worsen. serious allergic reactions may occur. mitzi: with less joint pain, watch me. for less joint pain and clearer skin, ask your rheumatologist about cosentyx. ask your rheumatologist depend silhouette briefs. feature a comfortable sleek fit. as a dancer, i've learned you can't have any doubts. because looking good on stage is one thing. but real confidence comes from feeling good out there. get a coupon at depend.com what's critical thinking like?

a basketball costs $14. what's team spirit worth? (cheers) what's it worth to talk to your mom? what's the value of a walk in the woods? the value of capital is to create, not just wealth, but things that matter. morgan stanley the entire community came whtogether as a whole.t, ♪ it was such an overwhelming response to help others. no one thought that they were going to do this before it happened and everyone just did it. i think that's the way that human nature should be looked at. ♪ i'll stand by you. ♪ i'll stand by you. ♪ won't let nobody hurt you. ♪ i'll stand by you. for her compassion and care. he spent decades fighting to give families a second chance.

but to help others, they first had to protect themselves. i have afib. even for a nurse, it's complicated... and it puts me at higher risk of stroke. that would be devastating. i had to learn all i could to help protect myself. once i got the facts, my doctor and i chose xarelto®. xarelto®... to help keep me protected. once-daily xarelto®, a latest-generation blood thinner... ...significantly lowers the risk of stroke in people with afib not caused by a heart valve problem. it has similar effectiveness to warfarin. xarelto® works differently. warfarin interferes with at least 6 blood-clotting factors. xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor interacting with less of your body's natural blood-clotting function. for afib patients well-managed on warfarin, there is limited information on how xarelto® compares in reducing the risk of stroke. don't stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase risk of stroke. while taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. it may increase your risk of bleeding if you take certain medicines. xarelto® can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. get help right away for unexpected bleeding,

unusual bruising, or tingling. if you've had spinal anesthesia, watch for back pain or any nerve or muscle-related signs or symptoms. do not take xarelto® if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. tell your doctor before all planned medical or dental procedures... ...and before starting xarelto®-about any conditions, such as kidney, liver, or bleeding problems. it's important to learn all you can... ...to help protect yourself from a stroke. talk to your doctor about xarelto®. there's more to know™. intrtechnology withnema. incredible color, sound and streaming. just as the creators intended. ♪ up to $200 off at dell.com ♪

we're following multiple breaking stories this hour, including new information related to stormy daniels' alleged affair with the president and her legal battle with his lawyer. let's bring in the former u.s. attorney, cnn senior legal analyst, preet bharara. preet, thanks so much for joining us. let's get to some of these legal questions. legally, do michael cohen's actions make sense? for example, why would a lawyer act this way without consulting his client, if that's, in fact, the case? >> generally speaking, lawyers are supposed to consult with their clients. they're not supposed to take legal action on behalf of their clients without getting their approval. they're representatives of other people, so that's what the relationship is about. but obviously, here, and i should note, this is a subject matter that's not my usual

expertise that you're asking me about on the show today, and it's been a long time since i've had contract class, but when you have a high-profile person, whether involved in a criminal investigation or something else, like this might be, and you've done something bad or something that you're not proud of or something that you want to keep quiet, you're kind of in a pickle. and you call your lawyer and your lawyer knows they're supposed to get ow you've the pickle. so there has been some criticism of the way in which the president's lawyer, michael cohen, constructed this nondisclosure agreement, there was no signature. it may not be enforceable in various ways. but in defense of him, which is an odd thing for me to say, he had a little bit of a conundrum, because he's trying to both keep something secret, but also have enforceable legal documentation of that secret, in some way. so, you know, it creates a kind of issue and so when you're thinking about the ways in which he handled it as a lawyer, you have to remember that he's also handling it as a pr matter, as a political matter, and as a

business matter. >> and he was handling it a few days before the presidential election in 2016, which raises all sorts of other questions. where do you think, preet, that this stormy daniels saga goes from here? >> i mean, i don't know. one of the things that you mentioned is that it was done right before the election and i don't think this particular issue is a matter for bob mueller, but i think some of your other guests on the program have already alluded to the fact that it may be a federal election commission issue. if it was something that was done, a payment that was made in connection with assisting donald trump in winning the election, which i think you can make a reasonable argument that it was, and that's why that much money was paid, then it could be a matter for the fec. whether they're going to enforce it or not is a separate matter. it also may be the case that this happened with respect to other people. so i think the thread is being pulled and it's not clear what it's going to lead to. >> because there are some who think it should be investigated by the fec, the federal election commission, and there are others who have suggested it should be

investigated by the fbi. if you were still the u.s. attorney in new york and a case like this, a $130,000 payment was made, and it wasn't reported as an in-kind campaign contribution, would this be something that you would look at? >> you know, it's possible. i would have to give that a little bit more thought, but i think it's possible, yeah. >> let's talk about another sensitive issue that's come up. as you know, "the new york times" has reported that president trump spoke to both don mcgahn, his white house counsel, and reince priebus, his former chief of staff about their separate conversations with the special counsel, robert mueller. if that doesn't rise to the level of witness tampering, what are other possible concerns? >> well, first of all, it's very dumb, and i hate to use that word lightly, but when people are being investigated in a serious way, by serious prosecutors, then the mueller team is a group of serious and talented and smart prosecutors, you're not supposed to talk to other people who are being interviewed. and from time to time, you know, even people in government get sued. and the first thing you learn is that you don't talk to other

people about the facts. because it can create the impression, even if it's not true, it can create the impression that you're trying to both, you know, influence their testimony about something, if they get called back to testify again, or you're trying to figure out how to conform your own testimony, if you're called to answer questions later, to the stories that other people have told. so at a minimum, it's unseemly, it's unwise. and depending on what the nature of those conversations were, and if there was some anticipation of further questions from the people that he was, you know, potentially trying to coach, it could rise to the level of obstruction. i read "the new york times" article, too. and some of the things i saw i don't think rise to the level of being obstruction. in other words, asking someone like don mcgahn, how did the interview go? did they treat you nice? again, as i often say on the show, the devil is in the details. what precisely did the president say. what precisely did the other person tell him? but at a minimum, it causes you to think that someone is up to

no good and is at least trying to have a chilling effect on other people. >> preet bharara, thanks so much for joining us. >> thanks. we're getting some more information now on this announcement that's coming from the south korean delegation at the white house on north korea. the president popped into the briefing room to tell us a major announcement was coming forward. we'll have new information for you right after this.

♪ hey, sir lose-a-lot! thou hast the patchy beard of a pre-pubescent squire! thy armor was forged by a feeble-fingered peasant woman... your mom! as long as hecklers love to heckle, you can count on geico saving folks money. boring! fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.

if you'd have told me three years ago that we'd be downloading in seconds what used to take minutes. that guests would compliment our wifi. that we could video conference and do it like that (snaps). if you'd have told me that i could afford a gig-speed. a gig-speed network. it's like 20 times faster than what most people have. i'd of said... i'd of said you're dreaming. dreaming! definitely dreaming. then again, dreaming is how i got this far. now more businesses in more places can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network.

we're standing by for what president trump says will be a major announcement from a south korean delegation that's been visiting the white house today and just came from pyongyang, north korea. i quickly want to go to cnn's will ripley. he's joining us from seoul, south korea, right now. what are you laerearning about s announcement, will? >> reporter: wolf, i've just learned from a former senior u.s. official that what the south koreans delivered, and it was very top-secret, was a letter from kim jong-un to president trump inviting the president for a meting with the north korean leader. this is hugely significant and this is also an indication that kim jong-un is really pushing forward with this diplomatic path. he feels that president trump was leaning more towards military action, tightening up on the sanctions. so now the north koreans telling trump they're willing to talk, they're willing to meet. and that's what was expected to be delivered in this message that the south koreans brought over from seoul to washington, wolf. >> elise labott is with us, as well. will, stand by for a moment.

elise, you're our global affairs correspondent. you're getting additional information about what else may be announced. >> reporter: el wiell, wolf, in addition to that meeting that kim jong-un offered, something else from our sources that the north koreans have been weighing since president trump got elected, we also understand that in that letter, kim jong-un offered to suspend nuclear and missile tests. that's the kind of step that the u.s. has been looking for to enter those negotiations. u.s. officials do tell us, though, this will not change the planned military exercises between the u.s. and south korea scheduled for next month. we do also, we hear from our sources that national security adviser, h.r. mcmaster will be briefing the u.n. security counsel on monday about these developments, wolf. >> very significant, potentially very sfoignificant developments. leon panetta is with us as well, the former defense secretary, the former cia director. what do you think, mr. secretary, about these late-breaking developments? we'll get formal word in the next several minutes? >> well, it's extremely

interesting to know that kim jong-un has issued an invitation to the president. but i would, i would be very cautious about this. number one, the president, the president needs to know, this can't just be a photo op with a political candidate. he's meeting with kim jong-un, who's threatened to annihilate the united states. and so he's going to have to lay some groundwork here. i think he should talk to our allies, to the south korean president, to the japanese, even to the chinese and others to get a sense of whether or not there's a benefit here or something that could be -- could create some difficult consequences. secondly, i think he's got to have -- if he does go through with this, he's going to have some very firm talking points

about what the united states' position is. and if he just walks in there and is not fully prepared in terms of what our strategy is, i think that could have the wrong consequences in terms of the impact. so, if he lays the proper groundwork with our allies, if he has a firm strategy, as to where the united states will go on negotiations, then i think this is worth considering. >> we're showing our viewers live pictures from outside the west wing of the white house, mr. secretary. we're expecting this announcement from the leader of the south korean delegation, who has briefed officials in the white house and is about to walk out and make this announcement. would you advise president trump, if there is, in fact, an invitation from coupkim jong-un a meeting, would you advise the president to go ahead and sit down face to face and meet with the north korean leader? >> i would only advise that if i

felt that the president had sat down and really considered what the consequences of this kind of meeting could be. i just think this is a serious moment and it's not just something where the president is going to show up and they do a photo op. make no mistake about it, kim jong-un will have some very determined talking points about what he would like to achieve in a negotiation. and i think before the president walks in that room, the president has to be fully prepared in terms of what the position of the united states and south korea and our allies is going to be in that kind of negotiation. if he's comfortable with that and if we've established that kind of strategy, then as i said, yes, it's something to seriously consider. >> as you know, they've -- >> -- where, when, how it should take place. >> they've already announced that kim jong-un will have a meeting with the south korean

president, president moon, along the demilitarized zone as early as next month. so clearly the south korean government is anxious for this kind of dialogue and they're the key u.s. ally on the korean peninsula, of course. >> they are and they've obviously had meetings personally with kim jong-un in north korea. and the south korean president obviously wants to pursue these negotiations. so i think all of that makes a lot of sense. obviously, we're in a much better path here, in terms of trying to negotiate some kind of resolution here. but for the president of the united states, to to now engage with the leader of north korea, i think if it's going to happen, everybody's got to think long and hard about what kind of strategy are we going to try to pursue? what are our key talking points here? what do we want to achieve? and if we feel comfortable with

all of that, then i say, yes, it's probably worth pursuing. particularly if it's done in conjunction with the president of south korea. >> all right, mr. secretary, thanks so much for joining us, leon panetta joining us on this important breaking news story. let's bring in our panel. and john kirby, let me get your thoughts. the president as recently as january was asked, would you be willing to speak, have phone talks with kim jong-un, and he said, sure, i always believe in talking. but we have a very firm stance. lac look, you know what it is, we're very firm, but i would be -- absolutely, i would do it, no problem with that at all. o potentiall so potentially a dialogue between kim jong-un and president trump could be in the works. >> potentially. and if it happened, as secretary panetta said, that would be enormously helpful and productive and it may be what's required to actually get some sort of meaningful peace agreement or arrangement on the peninsula. but the only i think i would add to secretary panetta's very, very sage advice is you've got to start building a framework

for getting to those talks. this is the kind of thing that you jump on the plane tomorrow. you're going to have lower-level meetings and discussions and really sort of flesh out what confidence-building measures can be put in place before you can safely and prudently put your president across the table from kim jong-un. >> gloria, the president clearly very excited about this. he came into the white house briefing room and told reporters, get ready, there will be a major announcement by the south koreans at 7:00 p.m. eastern. >> right, a big reveal. and we don't know, we're not quite sure what it is. we don't know whether the president will agree. we don't know whether this is just going to be something that they might agree to do at some time in the future. as elise was talking about before, it seems that they've said, okay, we're going to stop testing our nuclear missiles as a precondition of this. you know that the united states have been talking about total denuclearization of north korea. and whether that would be enough for a sit-down remains to be seen. we are assuming the president

will respond positively. but we have to wait, we have to wait and see exactly what his preconditions are for any kind of a meeting. where would it be, and when would it be? and what would have to occur from our point of view before any such meeting could take place? >> everybody, stand by. we're getting more information. we're awaiting the official announcement from the south korean delegation over at the white house. you see the cameras are there. the microphones are there. they'll be walking out very soon. we'll have live coverage, right after this. helped put a roof over the heads of hundreds of families, he's most proud of the one he's kept over his own. brand vo: get paid twice as fast with quickbooks smart invoicing. quickbooks. backing you.

a hilton getaway means you get more because you get a break on breakfast get an extra day by the pool get to spend more time together get more from your spring break getaway with exclusive hilton offers. book yours, only at hilton.com ♪ ♪ i can do more to lower my a1c. because my body can still make its own insulin. and i take trulicity once a week to activate my body to release it, like it's supposed to. trulicity is not insulin. it comes in a once-weekly, truly easy-to-use pen. the pen where you don't have to see or handle a needle. and it works 24/7. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable medicine to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes

when used with diet and exercise. it should not be the first medicine to treat diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take trulicity if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, if you have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you're allergic to trulicity. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or symptoms like itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, and indigestion. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. to help lower my a1c i choose trulicity to activate my within. ask your doctor if once-weekly trulicity is right for you. ♪ ♪

is right for you. you wouldn't accept from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase relieves your worst symptoms including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. flonase.

the most trusted name in news. any moment now south korean delegation will emerge what president trump calls a major announcement as far as north korea is concerned. >> i want to go to will ripley in seoul south korea getting new information. as we a wait this announce. will, tell viewers what you've heard. >> reporter: we are hearing from a former senior u.s. official that what was delivered by the south korean delegation led by national chief was an invitation from kim jong-un to meet with president trump. and this may explain why the president surprised own staff members at the briefing room when he said this announcement was coming. the blue house in seoul said the announcement will be made in english. we believe the security chief making the announcement or standing by sarah sanders.

also standing by the chief two leaders of the delegation went to pyongyang in north korea, first time south korea has been allowed inside the building. clearly, kim jong-un came there to deal a deal with the south koreans. they met with more than four hours and gave them that letter that they flew from seoul to washington hours ago and been whirlwind of meetings with the white house. now major announcement what's believed to be a letter from kim jong-un to president trump offering a meeting. >> in new york, she's getting more information has well. what else are you learning, elise? >> reporter: well, wolf, we also understand the north koreans are willing to consider suspending nuclear missile testing. that's the step u.s. has been looking for north korean to do in even to engage in talks. obviously, the full goal is complete denuclearization, but

even secretary of state tillerson has said that he realizes that's something that's going to take time, but they do want to see this initial step from north korea. and now the national security adviser who met with the south korean delegation h.r. mcmaster going on monday to the u.n. security council to brief them on what's going on, wolf. but i this i would he have to be clear, a long process ahead, even though there is this invite for a meeting with donald trump, there is a lot of steps that have to happen. preparing the ground, talks with maybe the state department, or other white house advisers before you would have a summit of that nature. >> yeah, that's a good point. john kirby, usually when there is a summit by the leaders there are a whole series of leaders by lower level officials. >> there should be a stairstep procedure where you get to the idea you might think of putting president trump across the table from kim jong-un. and let's, i mean i don't want to min nice the significant of this, it is important, and we

all should look forward to this announcement, but some of this stuff we have heard the north korean say before, freeze, and buss busted those promises and be mindful of this. >> clearly the president is pleased by this told us get ready for a major announcement. >> yes. he likes this. and potentially very big. but the administration has to tread carefully here as admiral kirby is saying, you have a situation whereas secretary panetta just said, serious moment, just sitting around the conference table with jared kushner and steven miller is not going to get t he's got to consult people who really know what's going on. >> the stakes are enormous, the stakes right now on the korean peninsula, nuclear tension major crisis. >> absolutely. you have to imagine there is going to be a great steel of sta teeingic president on the

president not only how does he respond, but if there is a meeting at some time in the future, how does the president address that. leon panetta was talking how important it is for the president to have firm talking points, thought out talking points going into any meeting with kim jong-un in north korea. and this president is not someone who sticks to talking points. that's something he's troubled with in meetings with republican leaders of congress. you have to imagine it would be incredibly difficult for him to do that in a meeting like this. >> only moments away from now. we'll stand by for that. we'll be right back. e grandpa. and if you have heart failure, entrusting your heart to entresto may help. entresto is a heart failure medicine that helps improve your heart's ability to pump blood to the body. in the largest heart failure study ever, entresto was proven superior at helping people

stay alive and out of the hospital compared to a leading heart failure medicine. don't take entresto if pregnant. it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren. if you've had angioedema while taking an ace or arb medicine, don't take entresto. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high blood potassium. ask your doctor about entresto. and help make more tomorrows possible. ♪ excuse me, are you aware of what's happening right now? we're facing 20 billion security events every day. ddos campaigns, ransomware, malware attacks... actually, we just handled all the priority threats. you did that? we did that. really. we analyzed millions of articles and reports. we can identify threats 50% faster. you can do that? we can do that. then do that.

can we do that? we can do that. we're drowning in information. where, in all of this, is the stuff that matters? the stakes are so high, your finances, your future. how do you solve this? you don't. you partner with a firm that advises governments and the fortune 500, and, can deliver insight person to person, on what matters to you. morgan stanley. depend silhouette briefs. feature a comfortable sleek fit. as a dancer, i've learned you can't have any doubts. because looking good on stage is one thing. but real confidence comes from feeling good out there. get a coupon at depend.com you're gaining something from meeting mr. adderley. it's a calling to not only everybody in this neighborhood in miami, but to the nation how great we are.

and how great we can be. ♪ ♪ i'll stand by you. ♪ i'll stand by you. ♪ and i'll never desert you. ♪ i'll stand by you.

this is cnn. the most trusted name in news. standing by for what president trump says will be a major announcement on north korea. gloria borger, it could include an invitation from kim jong-un to president trump for a meeting. >> right. and we should caution there is nobody i've spoken to who is saying that the president ought to jump on a plane any time soon for any kind of a meeting right now. but this is a huge development. just, remember, in september the president addressed the united nations and he said if north korea attacked any of the allies or the united states, that the united states would have no choice but to totally destroy north korea. and that was at the time when he was referring to kim jong-un as

rocket man. clearly, things have changed, wolf. >> yes. and we are standing by for this announcement momentarily. let's see how significant it really is. but we'll continue our breaking room coverage. i'm wolf blitzer in "the situation room." thanks for watching. erin burnett outfront starts right now. outfront next breaking news president trump promising a major announcement momtds from now. live we are learning about an invitation from kim jong-un personally to trump. plus russian investigators on capitol hill calling for a subpoena for lewandowski amid questions for prince on a meeting in the seychelles. and a new twist in the stormy daniels saga. we have more in