Skip to main content

tv   Anderson Cooper 360  CNN  August 13, 2018 5:00pm-6:01pm PDT

5:00 pm
finger on the nuclear codes. >> reporter: bulging eyes will never overshadow -- shirks a chaos candidate. >> reporter: presidential astonishment. who, me? jeanne moos -- >> what? [ laughter ] >> reporter: cnn. >> what do you mean? >> you'll see. [ laughter ] >> reporter: new york. >> well done, jeanne. thanks for joining us. anderson is next. good evening. in normal times, it would be strange to lead a newscast with the firing of a former reality tv contestant, but let's face it. no matter where you are in the political spectrum, you probably agree these are not exactly normal times. so we begin tonight with omarosa manigault newman fired once three times from "the apprentice" and once interest the white house. fool me four times? i don't know who to blame. manigault is now trying to sell a book and is waging a war of words of sorts with her old
5:01 pm
boss, president trump. she is releasing tapes made on the job, including one with the president. and she promise morse recordings of phone calls according to phone calls with ivanka and jared kushner. she once held an office for liaison. she drew the highest salary possible andrew questions of what qualifications if any she had for the job. now that she is back this the spotlight, manigault newman is being accused of poor judgment on the job, and worse, by the same people who hired her in the first place. she is being called a liar by many people, including by michael cohen who is also at war with the president who also recorded conversations with him. it's of course a cliche to point out that all sounds like a reality show, but yes, this all sounds like a reality show, a show where public employees are told to sign nondisclosure agreements which she just said she did not sign, but show where the boss is talking about paying hush money the silence "playboy" models and where he allegedly offers a deal to manigault newman to remain on friendly
5:02 pm
terms. it's a show where the president loudly promised to hire only the best people only to ditch them and call them wacky and more. manigault newman released this clip reportedly of her firing by john kelly in "the situation room." >> we've got to talk to you about leaving the house. it's come to my attention over the last few months that there has been some pretty, in my opinion, significant integrity issues. i think it's important to understand that if we make this a friendly departure we can all be -- you can look at your time here in the white house as a year of service to the nation and then you can go on without any type of difficulty in the future relative to your reputation. >> can i ask you a couple questions? does the president -- is the president aware of what's going on? >> let's not go down the road. this is a nonnegotiable discussion. >> this morning also on nbc, manigault newman released
5:03 pm
another record gd of a call, reportedly with the president. >> omarosa, what's going on? i just saw on the news that you're thinking about leaving. what happened? >> general kelly, general kelly came to me and said that you guys wanted me to leave. >> no. nobody even told me about it. >> wow. >> they run a big operation, but i didn't know it. i didn't know that. >> yeah. >> damn it. i don't love you leaving at all. >> well, the president either pretending he didn't know she was going to be fired or actually not knowing she was going to be fired, but not exactly stopping it either. that is what he said then. this is what he tweeted this morning. quote, wacky omarosa, who got fire lead times "the apprentice" now got fired for last time. she never made it. she never will. she begged me for a job, tears in her eyes. i said okay. people in the white house hated her. she was vicious but not smart. i would rarely see her, but would hear really bad things, would constantly miss work. when general kelly came on
5:04 pm
board, he told me she was a loser and would only cause problems. i told him to try working it out, if possible because she only said great things about me, until she got fired. >> someone make it in real life because she had been fired three times from a reality tv show, a tv show he continued to have her on. the president is also suggesting that despite being nasty and missing meetings and work and being informed by his chief of staff that she was nothing but problems, wanted her to remain because, quote, she only said great things about me. given that, was the president just making it up when he said this about her during the campaign? >> and omarosa, don't leave, omarosa. she is a wonderful woman. don't leave. she's a wonderful woman. she has done so much for me with the african american community, with communities generally, and she's another one. she is such a fine person. and nobody knows it. you are amazing, okay? i just want to thank you very much for everything you've done.
5:05 pm
>> see? it sounds there he is not just talking about a lies the fired reality star who says nice things about her. it sounds more like he considers her a great hire like all the other great people he either had hired or was planning on hiring. >> we're going to make america great again. we're going to use our best people. >> i'm going get the best impeachment we're going to deliver. we're going get the best people in the world. >> we don't want people that are b level, c level, d level. we have to get our absolute best. >> we're going to use our smartest and our best. we're not using political hacks anymore. it's a chess match but have i the best people lined up. >> you need people that are truly, truly capable. >> we have to get the best people. >> so was omarosa manigault newman one of the best or was she australia, to use the president's words, a loser? is she a low life or a fine person as he once said? we may never actually know. but if the president is right now, what is his hiring of ms.
5:06 pm
manigault newman say about his own judgment and the kind of people he wants to surround himself with? we don't know what sarah sanders used to think, but now that the president doesn't like her, she is clearly not fan. the very idea a staff member would sneak a recording device into the white house situation room shows a blatant disregard for national security and then to brag about it on national television further proves the lack of character and integrity of this former disgruntled employee. michael cohen also decided to weigh, in tweeting to the many dozens of journalists who called me questioning omarosa's claim in her real book that potus @real donald trump took a note from me, put a note in his mouth and ate it, i saw no such thing, and i'm shocked anyone would take this seriously. just for the record he is saying he never saw the president eat a piece of paper. and the president of the united states retweeted that. and that is all just part of today's reality. more now on this from kaitlan
5:07 pm
collins, who joins us from the white house. how is the white house trying to explain what is going on here? >> anderson, my how the strategy has changed from week ago when aides were encouraging the president not to tweet about omarosa and give her book any oxygen. the president now tweeting multiple times about omarosa today, naming her specifically, saying that when she was in the white house, she wasn't liked buy her colleagues, that she regularly missed meetings and even skipped work, yet he kept her around because she praised him. a reminder, she is someone who made $180,000 of taxpayer-funded money. but anderson, certainly these recordings from omarosa that she has released over the weekend and today are creating a sense of paranoia in the west wing. staffers long suspected when omarosa was on her way out that she was recording conversations she was having, but these are recordings being published really give weight to those claims and even give weight that omarosa was having conversations with the president and chief of staff and other senior white house officials, and they are worried about what else could come out. >> is it clear what, if any
5:08 pm
recourse the administration would have against manigault newman? the president says she has a full signed nondisclosure agreement which she moments ago denied that she had signed. do we know what the truth is here? >> well, anderson, the president seemed to be referencing those ndas that they had white house staffers sign last year which a lot of them saw as unenforceable, watered down version. but omarosa making clear she did not sign the white house version of the nondisclosure agreement. she could have signed one when she was on the trump campaign or at the trump organization. it's unclear which nda it was that she signed. but the president tweeting that there. but also omarosa threatening that she does have more tapes to come, and she is waiting to see what the white house's reaction is going to be because she does believe they will retaliate against her. she didn't say how or what they were expecting, but did say that and if they do, she could publish other tapes. >> kaitlan collins, thank you very much. joining us david gergen, paris
5:09 pm
denard. paris, i want to start can you. when omarosa left the white house, you had some interesting things to say. it doesn't really get to today's story, but it's interesting. it sets the stage you. were saying one of the criticisms of her was that rather than kind of reach out to people, she basically isolated potentially good people who could have come to the white house because she was concerned about her own power. i don't want to put words in your mouth. but is my memory correct on that? >> anderson, your memory is absolutely correct because that is the truth that is exactly what happened. omarosa had this complex about being the number one person in charge at the white house and being the assistant to the president, the highest ranking black american at the white house. and there were several people who wanted to work at the white house from day one. james, who is the president of the heritage foundation is one person on the record as saying that omarosa blocked her. and there are other people who came in and who wanted to come in, but omarosa successfully
5:10 pm
blocked them from coming to the white house. but luckily, even with her attempts, there were black americans on day one, and there are black americans working there now in pretty important roles. but the fact of the matter is omarosa was concerned about her own ego, about her own status, and about her own image in the trump white house and across the country, masquerading as if she was the black laysan person when she really wasn't. she could have had that title, but decide not to hire anybody to actually be the laysan to the black community like i was when i was the director of black outreach at the white house for the bush administration. but instead she became the director of communications and office of laysan, a position created just for her, but it was convenient when she didn't want to do black issues. she would say oh, have i so many things on my plate because i'm dealing with all of the things that public liaison is doing. she did not want anybody tolles
5:11 pm
be at the table, and that's unfortunate. >> so david, what does it say? i think paris' perception of this is really interesting. what does it say about the president and the kind of people he hired or wanted to keep around. anybody -- i didn't even watch "the apprentice," and i knew her representation. the idea that anybody would be surprised of anything that is happening, i just feel it's hard to imagine that anyone, particularly the president nor the white house would be surprised. >> well, certainly reince priebus must not be surprised. it's been widely reported that as the incoming chief of staff, he tried to block her from coming to the white house. the president insisted, and she came in on trump's -- basically, his order, to hire her and put her in an important position. i do think donald trump has ample reason to be angry now at her because she has violated all the norms and rules that go with being a white house staffer, and
5:12 pm
that is you are a member of the staff. you're expected to keep -- you can write a book later on, but do so after a period of discretion and some distance, and certainly carrying around a wire, i just can't imagine. the last time i heard about wires in the white house was in the nixon administration when the president himself ordered that people, there be wiretaps on people. but this is a -- i think is a blow that goes well beyond omarosa. increasingly it's becoming a tension about race and race in the white house and donald trump's racial views. >> amanda, how do you see this? david said the president has reason to be upset. again, i come back to how could he have not known who he was hiring? and even from the get-go, it seems like plenty of people around him were saying what are you doing? this is not a good idea. but she said good things about him so he want herd to stay. >> yeah, what i think -- i think we're seeing something pretty
5:13 pm
serious here. i think it's fun to laugh australia because it's omarosa and we know her from reality tv. but what we are watching in realtime is someone attempting to blackmail the president that collected tapes and evidence to use against him if anyone in the white house retaliates against her for writing this book. and so who else has blackmailed? what was michael cohen doing when he was recording the president? stormy daniels, her lawyer michael avenatti say they have a dvd of some kind of evidence against the president. the "national enquirer" negotiated a hush agreement on trump's arguable behalf for karen mcdougal. how many people have this kind of blackmail against the president? it's a fair question. and what omarosa is doing is not funny. i think people think it's fun to watch because they don't like president trump. no, this is pretty seriousment you're watching someone bully the president, and she is pretty much able to do it because he made the mistake of hiring her. >> paris, it's not funny, because to the point that was
5:14 pm
made by kaitlan, she was paid very highly from american taxpayer dollars for a job which as you yourself was saying she wasn't doing. >> no, absolutely. it's not funny. there is -- i've heard reports of people that are in this book and there are claims of defamation of character. she is making claims that are just absurd. i think just to the president's credit, the president hired her because one, he likes people who are loyal and he likes people who support him, and she was effective on the campaign trail talking about him and defending him to the black community and to all communities, talking about the fact that she did not believe he was racist and all the things he was going to do for if black community and the things he was going to do for urban america, things i believe and know he is doing. but it's interesting when she worked for him on "the apprentice" three times and the ultimate merger which is another she did with him. and then for the campaign and the transition and a year at the white house. tanduay after she was fired, she
5:15 pm
never once said the man was racist. the day after she was fired, she resign and said then he is not a racist. this is a woman who knows him and knows him not to be a racist, said as much, and now conveniently when she needs money because her gravy train with the trump team and family has run out she is going to flip and now say he is a racist. it's unfortunate and pretty sad. >> david, you're shaking your head. >> i want to say a couple things. look, i think she is a grifter. i have no use for her. she has done terrible things and all of that. let's face it. she is handing donald trump some of his own medicine. he was recording people secretly in his offices long before he became president, made a habit of it, used the tapes to his advantage. and now people are turning around and doing that. what happens in a presidency is everybody takes their cues from the president. he sets the standards. if he starts behaving in certain way, other people follow. what i think is particularly unfortunate about this whole incident is this is a black
5:16 pm
woman who is involved here. and for many blacks in this country, what they have heard is yet another black person the president knows being called dumb. when he turns on her. he went after lebron, he went after maxine walter, he went after our don lemon, he has gone after her. and black athletes are sobs for take agony. and as one of your contributors pointed out recently, blacks come from shithole countries. there is a pattern here i think is as disturbing as anything else that is going on in this story. >> paris, do you see that as part of this pattern? >> no, i don't. and i think it's insulting to the men and women who are serving currently in the white house to think that they -- this is what happens at this white house. omarosa did this. it is dumb, quite frankly, to go into "the situation room." >> how many blacks are in senior positions? >> well, if you want to have that -- >> how many blacks are in
5:17 pm
senior? >> jonathan hollyfield director of the white house initiative. smith who is a commissioned officer in legislative affairs. mary elizabeth taylor who are is a commissioned officer who just got appointed by the president. >> these are all second and third tier people. how many people are in first tier positions? >> there is no one that is at the assistant to the president level. however, the two persons that i named before are commissioned officers which are as you know very well are in the senior level positions, as well as the fact that executive director is jonathan hollyfield. and you have other people, the deputy director of the white house fellows program is african american. you have the second lady in the united states, her communications director is cara brooks who is african american. and across the administration in senior level positions in the agencies, you have many african americans serving in senior level position. so that's the facts. >> amanda, the notion that the president feigned ignorance and displeasure when we talk todman
5:18 pm
gault newman, i don't know how that was recorded, this was something that was released by her. do you find that telling? it runs consistent with what maggie haberman in the past has talked about, doesn't like direct confrontation. and he either is feigning oh, i didn't know that you were going to be fired, i don't like the idea of you leaving. he's not saying i'm going to stop it or anything. >> yeah. i think trump often tries to play both sides on the issue. i don't know what he really knew at the time. but for all this talk of what omarosa may have invented or not, there has been a productive piece of information that came out of this, and that's in the fact that kellyanne conway did confirm that west wing staffer asked to sign nondisclosure agreements. with that, omarosa has also produced evidence that she was offered a $15,000 a month contract that she describes as hush money. and so i think this has far-reaching implications, because if the republican
5:19 pm
national committee funds and/or trump campaign funds are used as hush money, i think donors are going to be very curious about that. and let's not forget that michael cohen was a deputy finance chair at the rnc. he had a say in how that money was used. i think rnc needs to be asked a lot of questions about where their funds are going and why. >> more on that in the coming days. david gergen, amanda carpenter, thank you. the president treated him lyme like number one, now fired. we'll talk about peter strzok's real or alleged defenses and whether they had anything to do with the president's displeasure. later, what the president said to james comey and why the shifting story line could matter a lot. we'll be right back. i am all about living joyfully.
5:20 pm
5:21 pm
the new united explorer card hooks me up. getting more for getting away. traveling lighter. getting settled. rewarded! learn more at all your school get supplies today... school..
5:22 pm
grade.. done. done. hit the snooze button and get low prices on school supplies all summer long. like these for only a 25 cents at office depot officemax. you shouldn't be rushed into booking a hotel. with expedia's add-on advantage, booking a flight unlocks discounts on select hotels until the day you leave for your trip. add-on advantage. only when you book with expedia. add-on advantage. 3 toddlers won't stop him.. and neither will lower back pain. because at a dr. scholl's kiosk
5:23 pm
he got a recommendation for our custom fit orthotic to relieve his foot, knee, or lower back pain, from being on his feet. dr. scholl's. born to move. when the fbi's office of professional responsibility got done investigating pete strzok, it recommend head be demote and suspended for 60 days. today he we learned he was fired. strzok, as you know, was bounced from the russia investigation last year in connection with a number of anti-trump ex-messages he exchanged with his lover at the time. it became a focal point for criticism of the probe, including this exchange while special counsel mueller took him off his team. >> my testimony, what you asked and what i responded to was he kicked me off because of my bias. i am stating to you it is not my understanding that he kicked me off by my bias, that it was done by appearance. i'm happy to answer that question, but i don't appreciate what was originally said being
5:24 pm
exchanged. >> i don't appreciate what you exchange. i don't appreciate having an fbi agent of your level working on investigations. >> he is now gone. he tweeted today, deeply saddened by this decision. it's been an honor to serve my country and work with the fine men and women of the fbi. he also linked to a gofundme page. the fbi had already punished him for texts. do we know now why he was fired or why he was fired now? >> there is actually no real answer from the fbi about this decision to fire peter strzok, anderson. the fbi's office of provisional responsibility which does deal with personnel matters recommended that a 60-day suspension along with a demotion for all these anti-trump tags. but the fbi's deputy director david bowdich was a trump appointee and fired strzok on friday. this caused strzok's attorney to say this breaks from precedent and is,quote, deeply troubling
5:25 pm
to all americans. the investigation did not find that strzok's personal feelings ultimately impacted the decision to clear hillary clinton of any wrongdoing. now after silence for much of the day, the fda did put out a statement saying, quote, the fbi director as a senior fbi official had the delegated authority to review and modify any disciplinary findings and/or penalty as deemed necessary in the best interests of the fbi. so as you can see, anderson, not many details about their thinking, all raising questions about whether or not his firing was prompted by pressure from the president and his relentless tweeting targeting strzok and the fbi. >> manu raju, thanks. i want to bring in special agent josh campbell. he worked for james comey. currently he is a cnn law enforcement analyst and also with us gloria borger. josh, you think he should have been fired? >> i think it's a tough decision. if you're the fbi director, you're trying to weigh two different things.
5:26 pm
there is peter strzok's performance as an fbi employee. he had a reputation of someone who is widely known as an excellent investigator, a counterintelligence agent. and then conduct. if you're sitting in the shoes of dave bowdich, does this type of conduct warrant a serious meting out of punishment, which would include termination in this case. he said that it did. i think that the audience wasn't necessarily the outside world, the american people, but it was internally. it was telling the rank and file that we expect you, the career fbi employees, to come to work every day and comport yourself in concert with our core values. how can i ask you to do that when i'm not holding our own senior leaders to the very same high standards. i doubt it was a very easy decision, but it was one he determined he had to make. >> gloria, you can also look ate as if he stayed in his job and interacted in the future on other occasions, would people automatically raise questions or be justified in raising questions about well, what's his motivation on this next investigation? >> sure. i think that was probably part
5:27 pm
of their consideration, although the inspector general said they did not believe that his work at the outset was biased. but, you know, i do believe that it would give people ammunition to use against the fbi, particularly the president of the united states, who doesn't seem to need any more than he already has. but in getting rid of peter strzok, he can claim victory, just as he did when the deputy director of the fbi andrew mccabe was fired. so the president can say, look, we've gotten rid of these two bad apples, although there are plenty more. >> josh, you think the president's attention on this had an impact? >> i don't. and it circles back to the person who made the decision. now i know dave very well. i worked for him in the fbi in a number of different positions. you would be hard-pressed to find somebody with greater inthe egg any the organization. when i heard it was him making the decision, that gave me
5:28 pm
comfort. thing is one of the instances where you can have two things both true at the same tile. we have a president of the united states and his allies in congress, congressman gowdy who have politicized this issue with peter strzok in a disgraceful way, going after a career civil servant. the other thing that is also true is you have an fbi employee who engaged in wrongdoing. i don't think that those officials inside the fbi who were making that decision were influenced by outside politics. i think they looked at a very tough decision and made a tough choice. >> gloria, in one of the president's tweets today he said the list of bad players in the fbi and doj gets longer and longer. if you still consider strzok a bad player, he obviously does, wouldn't the list be getting shorter? >> well, you might think so. but there are plenty of bad players. i mean, as far as the president's concerned, how about starting with the special counsel, robert mueller. how about starting with his own attorney general, who he's been tweeting about. how about the deputy attorney general, rod rosenstein, whom he doesn't seem to like.
5:29 pm
how about all the lawyers who work for bob mueller. what does he call them, 13 angry democrats, or maybe now the number is up to 17. i think there are always going to be plenty of people that the president is going to feel aggrieved by, particularly so long as they're involved in the russia investigation, which he still, of course, considers a witch-hunt and a hoax. >> gloria, thanks very much. josh campbell as well. if president trump's attorney, rudy giuliani is at it again tonight, saying that the president never had a conversation with fired fbi director james comey about limiting the investigation into former national security adviser michael flynn, this despite giuliani saying precisely that last month, an attempt at untangling it all is just ahead. this school year, get a new iphone from t-mobile and keep your whole family connected. or keep tabs on them. he skipped orientation for the beach? he takes after me. join t-mobile, buy an iphone 8, get an iphone 8 on us.
5:30 pm
but it's tough to gete enough of their nutrients. new one a day with nature's medley is the only complete multivitamin with antioxidants from one total serving of fruits and veggies try new one a day with nature's medley. i'm ray and i quit smoking with chantix. i tried to quit smoking for years on my own. i couldn't do it. i needed help. for me, chantix worked. it did. chantix, along with support, helps you quit smoking. chantix, without a doubt, reduced my urge to smoke. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. some people had changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, agitation, depressed mood, or suicidal thoughts or actions with chantix. serious side effects may include seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking or allergic and skin reactions which can be life-threatening. stop chantix and get help right away if you have any of these. tell your healthcare provider if you've had depression or other mental health problems.
5:31 pm
decrease alcohol use while taking chantix. use caution when driving or operating machinery. the most common side effect is nausea. i don't think about cigarettes anymore. talk to your doctor about chantix.
5:32 pm
5:33 pm
another keeping them honest report tonight, and another example of someone speaking for the president, trying the gas light the american public. it's certainly no secret the president trump's attorney would be rudy giuliani is no shrinking violet when it comes to putting his client's views about the investigation on public display. so here he is about 36 hours ago telling our jake tapper on state of the union that the president did not have a conversation with former fbi director james comey about limiting the investigation into his former national security adviser michael flynn. >> is there was no conversation about michael flynn. the president didn't find out that comey believed there was until about i think it was february when it supposedly took place. >> but mr. mayor, you told abc news last month that president told comey, quote, can you give him a break. how your saying -- >> i never told abc that. that's crazy. i never said that. >> crazy. he never said that, he says. but here he is, july 8th on abc
5:34 pm
saying that. >> how is he a good witness for president if he is saying that the president was asking him, directing him in his words, to let the michael flynn investigation go? >> he didn't direct him to do that. what he said to him was -- >> comey says -- >> so in case you missed that, because the cross talk, mr. giuliani said, quote, what he said to him was, can you give me a break, which is of course the exact thing he denied saying to jake. not to be deterred, mr. giuliani took another crack at it this morning. >> what he was saying is perfectly justifiable. he didn't say you must, you have to, i'll fire you if you don't. he said consider it. number three, he never said it. lawyers talk like this all day. we call it arguing the alternative. >> so let's start to unpack all of that. i'm joined by alan dershowitz, the author of the book the case against impeaching trump and jeffrey toobin, who once study under professor dershowitz. jeff, the idea that giuliani floated that the conversation never took place, is this some
5:35 pm
strategic shift or is this just a lawyer who can't keep the story straight? >> no, i think there is method here. you need to look at what giuliani is doing as a political strategy more than a legal strategy, and he is giving choices to what people want -- can believe. they can believe that this conversation never took place. they can believe that if it took place, there was no crime committed there. and i think this is something that the president has been doing, which is basically throw everything up against the wall. and, you know, if you look at the polls, some of it seems to be work. >> professional dershowitz, is there a method there? giuliani did there in the morning shows actually there was a conversation, just not how it was portrayed. >> well, i think jeffrey is absolutely correct. this is a political tactic. and i'm not an expert in politics. it may or may not be working. from a legal point of view, it makes very little sense because mueller has a witness. and from his point of view, it's a credible witness that the conversation occurred.
5:36 pm
and it really doesn't matter from the point of view of filing a report or filing charges whether there is a denial that the conversation occurred. i think for the purposes of any legal analysis, you have to assume the conversation occurred. it may have occurred with this nuance or that nuance. and then the question becomes a legal question. does the president have the authority to ask his director of the fbi to go easy or to lay off. and my answer to that right from the beginning has been yes, he does have that thunderstorm. it might be a political sin to do it and a violation of traditions of separation between the white house and the justice department. but going back to thomas jefferson and franklin delano roosevelt and john kennedy, presidents have directed their justice departments who to prosecute and who not the prosecute. >> this is where i disagree with alan on the law, that i do think it is potentially an impeachable offense for a president to tell the director of the fbi don't
5:37 pm
prosecute, investigate, bother someone who may yet implicate me. i think that's the very definition of a corrupt motive. but i do agree that this is a political process. and i think what giuliani is doing is basically telling the republican base what mueller is doing is wrong. you can pick your reasons. >> but professor, if giuliani is add mortgage confusion what is actually happening, couldn't you make the argument that therefore it becomes even more important for the president to actually speak to mueller to clear up what actually happened? >> you're sounding like -- you're talking like a citizen of the united states. >> forgive me. >> but from the point of view of a lawyer for a person who is under investigation, confusion is a good thing, not a bad thing. and your client has no occasion to clarify. all he has is an obligation to make sure that he doesn't say anything that results in incriminating statements. >> jeff, i want to ask you something about that giuliani
5:38 pm
also said yesterday that i didn't quite understand. he said that it would be easier for him if the president did ask comey to give flynn a break that would be something he and jay sekulow could defend. >> i think alan's making that point, that the president can to do for any purpose. and i just think that's dead wrong. i think if you look at watergate, if -- the president did have the legal right to tell the fbi that the cia wanted the watergate investigation stopped. that was done for a corrupt motive, and it was seen, properly, as an impeachable offense. but just because -- >> but that was a crime. that was a crime itself, telling a subordinate to lie to the fbi is a crime. everything -- negative, it's not a crime. >> that nixon was charged -- yes, it is. you can't tell somebody to commit a crime. >> it's nato crime to tell fbi. >> that's a crime. of course it is. >> not in an investigation. >> an untruth.
5:39 pm
in any investigation, that's 1001. you can not lie to a law enforcement official about a subject of the investigation if it's material. look, i also disagree that it's a good thing for if he said that. it's much better from a criminal defense point of view. i'm not saying it to advise the president. obviously, i'm not his lawyer. but it's much better from the point of view of the defense to be able to say look, i didn't do it. but if i did do it, it's legal than to say well, maybe i did it. but if i did do it, maybe it's legal. it's much better to have alternative defenses. but right now we're hearing a confused alternative defense. we don't know whether t position of the white house. we do know the position of the white house is if he said it, it's not a crime. i think that's correct. >> nope. >> well, we have a fundamental disagreement. >> we've been disgrigg about this for months. if you have a corrupt motive to save your own skin, the fact that you have the legal right to fire the fbi director doesn't
5:40 pm
matter. >> so you say -- so you say that bush was criminal, that george h.w. bush was a criminal, because that fits exactly into what you're saying. he had a corrupt motive to saver his own skin, and he pardoned. >> that's not true. it was on the last day. no, i'm not saying that. >> what's the difference if it's the last day? >> it's a total -- because there was no more presidency. there was the presidency was over. he wasn't worried about criminal -- >> but it doesn't matter if he committed a crime on the last day, he committed a crime on the last day. remember, that a president can be indicted and convicted after he leaves office. so he was trying to save his own skin. yes, it would have been a crime under your theory. but i think your theory respectfully is wrong. thinking is a wonderful trip down memory lane to the george herbert walker bush presidency. >> precedent matters. precedent matters. >> from the master. >> jeff toobin, professor dershowitz, thank you so much. >> thank you. >> reference to kung fu early
5:41 pm
'70s. never mind. the president signed spending bill named in honor of john mccain, now seriously ill with brain cancer. the president might have used this as an opportunity to say something nice about the senator. we'll tell you what he actually said instead. ♪ ♪ let your perfect drive come together at the lincoln summer invitation sales event. get 0% apr on select 2018 lincoln models plus $1,000 bonus cash. you wouldn't accept from any one else. why accept it from an allergy pill? flonase relieves sneezing, itchy, watery eyes and a runny nose, plus nasal congestion, which most pills don't. it's more complete allergy relief. flonase.
5:42 pm
little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats moderate to severe plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla . it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with... increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have  a history of depression or suicidal thoughts,... ...or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you.
5:43 pm
5:44 pm
5:45 pm
president trump signed a massive pentagon budget bill today in a ceremony at fort drum, new york. officially it's called the john s. mccain national reauthorization act. and as chief executives tend to do, the president thanked all manner of high-ranking officials for making the whole thing possible. listen to what he left out, starting with the name of the bill. >> the national defense authorization act is the most significant investment in our military and our war fighters in modern history, and i am very proud to be a big, big part of it. i'd like to recognize deputy secretary of defense shanahan, who is with us. please, mr. secretary. i want to thank general dunford, general millie, general in
5:46 pm
neller, general fogoldfein. well would not be here for today's signing ceremony without the dedicated efforts of the members of congress who worked so hard to pass the national defense authorization act. >> missing from that list, of course, is the president mentioning the very person for who the bill is named for, senator john mccain, former p.o.w., war hero, the john mccain battling brain cancer. here is a look at the front page of the legislation. there is senator mccain's name pretty far down in the small print. the president headed for another political rally, this on behalf of a new york congresswoman. didn't say senator mccain's name at the rally. he also didn't miss a chance to take a dig at senator mccain, referencing his no vote on the bill. >> one of our wonderful senators said thumbs-down at two income the morning. >> joining me former trump campaign aide michael caputo and kirsten powers. good to have you both on. kirsten, the fact that the
5:47 pm
president didn't say mccain's name though he had multiple opportunity, the name being on the bill, does it say something to you? >> yeah, i think it shows that he cannot rise above his petty differences with john mccain, who as we all know is dying. and this is somebody who is at the end of his life, a very storied career, including in the republican party very important person to the republican party. which is why this is named after him. it's something he worked on. and so to not give him credit and not be able to acknowledge that, i think it just looks extremely petty and small. you somebody who deserves some recognition, especially at the end of his life. >> michael, should the president have thanked mccain? >> i don't know. this is -- politics ain't beanbag. and senator mccain hasn't been good to the president. he's insulted the president over and over and over again. this is -- politics can get petty, and it's gotten really personal between these two men. and i appreciate the fact that
5:48 pm
the president name checked him today. the bill an important bill and he put some work into it. i wish him and his family luck. not everybody in the united states thinks very highly of john mccain. i came across -- i came up with my dislike for john mccain long before the president ever ran for office, and, you know, he is not exactly nice to the people who he opposes, and he has been really nasty to the president of the united states. >> kirsten, in one of the president's tweets today about omarosa manigault, he said that he tried to keep her on at the white house because she only said great things about him. it's kind of a telling remark. i mean, he had john kelly saying according to him she is a loser, she doesn't do work, she is causing trouble, but he said try to make it work because she says great things about him. >> right. i think it says a lot, and i think in the context of this conversation, if i can just quickly talk, what michael just said, thing is one of the big problems now that you see in politics, which is michael's
5:49 pm
basically saying, well, because he is a political enemy, and he said bad things about me, even though he is dying and he has had a storied career, who cares, when it actually used to be that people who would go up against each other in the presidential races. that would actually even end up being friends sometimes. and at a bare minimum, could show decency. so i think in this situation with omarosa, the fact that the president would just want somebody who is just saying ipo things about him suggests somebody who has, you know, maybe is too closely identified with his ego. >> is it a lack? >> as you know omarosa was the communications director of the public liaison office, and her job was to say nice things about the president and publicize his policies. i mean, if you're going to criticize him for her talking about doing her job, i don't know. also, by the way, the incivility in politics isn't brand-new to 2018. it went on decades ago. it went on a century ago.
5:50 pm
>> that was my point. >> it's the spirit. >> that was my point, michael. >> it's the spirit of democracy. >> that was my point. >> it's not unusual. i understand. >> but this has always gone on. but people are able afterwards to be able to be decent to each other, especially when people are dying or even when they die. you will see when somebody dies in politics, even if it was somebody you didn't agree with, you usually try >> surely. >> this is an unusual way to behave for a president of the united states. >> no, it's not. as i said before, the rivalries that lasted well beyond an election have gone on throughout the history of the american republic. this is not an unusual one. it's a recent one. it's a particularly visceral one, and i think a lot of us are disappointed it's debilitated to this point. >> a lot of people pointed to ronald reagan and tip o'neill as competitors who didn't see eye to eye on much but who were social and friendly with each other when all was said and done. >> right. that's when i came to washington
5:51 pm
when you would see people nearly in fist fights on the house floor, on the senate floor. then you'd see them at the monday acal having drinks together. the stories of tip o'neill and ronald reagan drinking whiskey together were great stories. but things have changed on capital. on sunday, we saw people itching for a fight, you know, wanting to hurt each other. right now i think america is in a bad place, and this relationship is just a smart part of it. >> but isn't the president to blame for that, or does he play -- >> i think both sides are to blame for it. i think the president is giving tit for tat with mccain. it wasn't just a couple of weeks ago where mccain intimated that the president might have committed treason in helsinki. this is a nasty back-and-forth, and i wish it wouldn't go on, but that's a fact of life. >> i just can't follow this. it's like it always happens, it never happens. it doesn't matter. i mean you keep changing everything around. it's like -- >> that's not what i said. you're absolutely mischaracterizing what i said.
5:52 pm
you are mischaracterizing what i said. >> what you just described in the monocle with tip o'neill and the president -- >> right. those were sanguine times and there were times before that that weren't like that. >> that's what i'm saying. >> i'm telling you it's cyclical -- >> it's not cyclical. it's donald trump. >> no, it's not. you're absolutely overestimating it. this is the way politics works. >> see, this is why i'm saying you're saying this is the way politics works like it's always been that way. it hasn't always been that way. the way the president is behaving when a man is dying because he's criticized him, it's childish. i mean it's petty. >> this is not the first time in history. it's not the first time in america. it's not even the first time in the last ten years. >> all right. let's just leave it there. kirsten powers, michael caputo, i appreciate it. i want to check in with chris to see what he's working on for "cuomo prime time" in seven minutes. >> news makers, baby. we've got kristin davis on tonight. she's going to tell us what is it like to be in there with mueller?
5:53 pm
what did he want to know about roger stone? what did she have to say? and then we have the attorney for peter strzok. why are they surprised that he got fired? what they say was -- what was really going on and what this is about. we're going to take both of those things on. we're going to have a great debate about what you were just talking about right there. and then i have a closing argument about how not all punches are equal. >> all right. i'll be watching. seven minutes from now. thanks very much. up next, white supremacists marching again. michael caputo was just talking about this, in washington. what they told our randi kaye when we continue. you shouldn't be rushed into booking a hotel. with expedia's add-on advantage, booking a flight unlocks discounts on select hotels until the day you leave for your trip. add-on advantage. only when you book with expedia. add-on advantage. ancestrydna can open you to a world of new cultures
5:54 pm
to explore. with two times more detail than any other dna test... you can get a new taste of your heritage. only $59- our site's lowest price ever. chair, new laptop headphones, with free 24/7 tech support. yep, thanks guys. i think he might need some support. yes. start them off right. with the school supplies they need at low prices all summer long. like these for only a 25 cents at office depot officemax. ( ♪ ) stop dancing around the pain that's keeping you awake. advil pm gives tossing and turning a rest and silences aches and pains. fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer with advil pm.
5:55 pm
today, life-changing technology from abbott is helping hunt them down at their source. because the faster we can identify new viruses, the faster we can get to stopping them.
5:56 pm
the most personal technology, is technology with the power to change your life. life. to the fullest. well, it was a year ago when president trump said, quote, there were very fine people on both sides when white supremacists and counterprotesters filled the streets of charlottesville, virginia. one of the supremacist used his car to plow down heather heyer. yesterday white supremacists gather yet again in washington for their so-called unite the right 2 rally. they were a smaller group but their message of hate remains. randi kaye was there. she talked with some of the marchers and discovered some of them feel emboldened by what the president said about them last year. take a look. >> reporter: in the shadow of the white house, about two dozen white supremacists led by
5:57 pm
organizer jason kessler carrying an american flag. >> i would like president trump first of all to know that there were good people on both sides. >> reporter: in a pre-rally tweet over the weekend, the president said he condemns all types of racism but didn't specifically denounce the white supremacists or neo-nazis who would be attending. and that as well as what the president has and hasn't said in the past makes keszler believe he has an advocate in the white house. do you get the sense the president has your back? >> i hope he does because there's a lot of people who -- who hate him and hate me and hate free speech, and i'm not trying to hurt anybody. i'm trying to stand up for my people. >> reporter: his people? white america. despite him telling me that he's fighting for the civil rights of all americans, there isn't any evidence to support that, nor did he give us any examples of a time he has advocated for any other group. and kessler is not alone in his
5:58 pm
thinking that white america may have an advocate in the oval office. >> i think he has the backing of the president in the fact that we want our white rights back which we have been stripped off. >> reporter: what rights he's referring to is anybody's guess. he wouldn't say. this 21-year-old from texas had plenty to say. >> we are here to protect the rights of not just whites but of all people, okay? we understand who is in power. we understand who is trying to enslave us, who is trying to manipulate us and trying to control us. >> who is that? >> there are a lot of theories about who they are, okay? i do think that they have an agenda to -- >> who is "they"? >> i am not going -- i do not want to mention name. >> do you feel like you have the president's backing and support? >> okay. so the president is a nationalist. he said it himself. we're nationalists as well. >> so is that a yes? >> no. no, no, no. all right. different allegiance, i guess you could say. our allegiance is to whites as a
5:59 pm
majority. trump's allegiance is to all the people of america, okay? he's not a bigot. he's not racist. i don't know how you guys can spin that. >> you didn't hear me say that. you're saying that. >> reporter: this man in the group proudly wearing his "make america great again" hat. do you feel like trump is a supporter of this group and jason kessler? >> yeah. yeah, i -- you know, i think he's like just a pretty fair, intelligent man. >> reporter: we asked the white house for a response. sarah sanders told us via e-mail, quote, the president has condemned all racism and said many times it has no place in our country, end quote. if ever white supremacists feel emboldened, it's now. randi kaye, cnn, washington. >> a quick reminder, don't miss our daily interactive newscast on facebook where you pick up some of the stories that -- you pick some of the stories we cover. it's called full circle. you can see it every week day night at 6:25 p.m. eastern at
6:00 pm cooper full circle. that's 6:25 p.m. eastern every week day night. the news continues. i want to hand it over to chris. "cuomo prime time" starts now. three generations of cuomos like your facebook show. my mom, my wife, my daughter. three generations. good for you, brother. i am chris cuomo. welcome to "prime time." an exclusive tonight. the closest that we've been able to get to knowing where bob mueller's probe is headed, at least with respect to roger stone. you knew her as the manhattan madam. her name is kristin davis, and she's here for her first interview since her grand jury testimony. what did they ask? what did she say? she is here to tell us. plus peter strzok fired from the fbi, and tonight his attorney is firing back. he is here to make the case to you that this firing is not about the text messages. and we have leon panetta,
6:01 pm