tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN September 18, 2018 3:00pm-4:00pm PDT
his supreme court nominee. it is not clear brett kavanaugh and his accuser christine blasey ford will both testify before senators on monday. tonight, partisan feuding over the terms, the timing and what happens if ford doesn't show. stormy's story. the porn star offers salacious new details about her alleged affair with mr. trump as her new book is designed to prove her accusations once and for all. i'll ask her lawyer. the new flooding danger in the carolinas as florence moves on but rivers keep rising. a top emergency official says the next 48 hours are crucial. and pardon-proof deal. experts are studying the fine print of paul manafort's agreement to cooperate with the special counsel as it is specifically designed to discourage the president from pardoning his former campaign chairman. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm jim acosta and you're in the "the situation room." wolf blitzer is off today. ♪
this is "cnn breaking news." . we are following breaking news on the allegations hanging over the president as supreme court nominee. tonight mr. trump says brett kavanaugh doesn't deserve to have his confirmation process in question. republicans and democrats are at odds over how a planned meeting on monday should play out if it happens at all. christine blasey ford has not agreed to testify in public or private about her claim she was sexually assaulted by kavanaugh when she were teenagers. kavanaugh denies the allegation. i will get reaction from eric swalwell and talk to stormy daniels's lawyer michael avenatti about his client's new memoire. our correspondents and analysts are standing by, but first to cnn's white house correspondent kaitlan collins. kaitlan, the president continues to defend kavanaugh. he did it again today. >> that's right, jim. and president trump has been measured in his response that
we've seen since these allegations made against judge brett kavanaugh. today we saw publicly what we know is happening privately behind closed doors and that's that president trump has doubts about the accusations. he pointed to the fact the alleged incident happened decades ago. he pointed to judge kavanaugh's record and he made clear he thinks he still will be confirmed as the next supreme court justice. >> he's an incredible individual, great intellect, great judge. >> reporter: president trump standing by his supreme court nominee day, projecting confidence. >> impeccable history in every way, in every way. >> reporter: even though for most of washington brett kavanaugh's cough fnfirmation i open question ahead of a scheduled public hearing ahead of a woman who says he sexually assaulted her when they were teenagers. >> i feel so badly he's going through this. this is not a hman that deserve
this. >> reporter: kavanaugh has denied the obligation and the president is blaming democrats, claiming they waited too long to release the woman's claim. >> because they obstruct and resist, that's the name of their campaign against me. so i don't want to play into their hands. >> reporter: senator dianne feinstein was made aware of the allegations earlier this summer, but she says she kept them confidential at the request of the accuser. trump disagreed with senate democrats who say the fbi should get involved. >> the fbi, john said that they really don't do that. that's not what they do. >> reporter: the president making no mention of christine blasey ford's name today, but urging her to publicly tell her story. >> hopefully, the woman will come forward, state her case. >> reporter: trump sounding sure of kavanaugh's innocence. >> he will state his case before representatives of the united states senate, and then they will vote. >> reporter: the president says he still hasn't spoken with kavanaugh, who spent the second day in a row at the white house today with sources describing
him as flabbergasted and shaken as the administration mounts a defense. >> judge kavanaugh is anxious to do it. i don't know about the other party, but judge kavanaugh is very anxious to do it. >> reporter: as trump vigorously defends his nominee, ordinary moments from kavanaugh's confirmation moment are now back in the spotlight. >> since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature? >> no. >> have you ever faced discipline or entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct? >> no. >> reporter: now, jim, president trump is someone who has been accused of sexual assault himself by at least 11 women. he's denied those allegations, weathered them and made it here to the white house, and now he's hoping that his supreme court nominee, brett kavanaugh, will be able to do the same, deny those allegations, weather them and make it on to the supreme court. jim. >> kaitlan collins, thank you
very much. let's go to capitol hill for the latest on whether the senate hearing will happen on monday and whether kavanaugh and his accuser both will be there. let's go to cnn's congressional correspondent phil mattingly. what are you hearing tonight? >> reporter: it is still very much an open when. at this point senate republicans still have not heard from christine blasey ford on her lawyer and they made clear monday is the opportunity, monday is the venue. if christine blasey ford wants to testify, that's when it is supposed to happen, whether open or closed. democrats, they have made very clear that is nearly good enough. that is not nearly enough time and there should be no deadline on a nomination that's this important with allegations that are this serious. the public hearing on assault allegations against president trump's supreme court nominee may not happen after all. >> she can do it privately if she prefers or publicly if she prefers. monday is her opportunity. >> this is a test for the united states senate on how we handle
accusations of sexual harassment and assault. i am hoping this senate passes it. >> reporter: and if it does take place, questions about who will testify. >> jim and grassley said there would only be two witnesses. that's simply inadequate, unfair, wrong, and a desire not to get at the whole truth and nothing but the truth. >> reporter: senate judiciary committee chairman chuck grassley telling radio host hugh hewett the hearing would only include two witnesses, judge brett kavanaugh and professor christine blasey ford and that ford had still not responded to the committee's request for a follow-up phone call or its hearing invitation. >> we have reached out to her in the last 36 hours, three or four times by e-mail, and we have not heard from them. so it kind of raises the question, do they want to -- do they want to come to the public hearing or not? >> reporter: while all ten democrats on the judiciary committee called for the hearing
to include more witnesses, including kavanaugh's former classmate mark judge, seen here in a georgetown prep yearbook. ford identified him as being in if room when the alleged assault occurred. republicans continue to stand firmly behind kavanaugh. >> an accusation which he has unequivocally denied and which stands at odds with every other piece of the overwhelming positive testimony we've received. >> reporter: and two key republican, senators susan collins and lisa murkowski, making clear ford not testifying would be a missed opportunity. >> she's now being given an opportunity to come before the senate judiciary committee and to answer questions, and i really hope that she doesn't pass up that opportunity. >> if she is not going to be part of the hearing, i think that that -- that would be a
very interesting and unfortunate turn of events. >> reporter: democrats who aides say were not consulted before the hearing was scheduled claim the process has already run afoul and want to delay the hearing until the fbi conducts a further background investigation. and, jim, right now while they still have not heard from dr. ford, the commit hee has heard from somebody else, mark judge, who i mentioned in the piece. his lawyer sent a letter to both republicans and democrats saying he is not planning to testify, does not want to testify, but also says this. i did not ask to be involved in this matter nor did anyone ask me to be involved. the only reason i'm involved is because dr. christine blasey ford remembers me as the other person in the room during the alleged assault. in fact, i have no memory of this alleged incident. brett kavanaugh and i were friends in high school, but i do not recall the party described in dr. ford's letter. more to the point, i never saw brett act in the manner dr. ford described. so, again, jim, more questions
than answers right now. as it currently stands, there's a hearing scheduled on monday. who will actually show up? well, at this point we will have the wait and see. >> all right, phil mattingly. thank you very much for that. another important story we are following, president trump is leaving the door open to tee classifying more documents related to the russia investigation, this as democrats are calling the unprecedented move an abuse of power. cnn justice correspondent evan perez is here. evan, the president was asked about this declassification and he went off as he often does about what he calls the russia witch hunt. but, i mean, you would have to be the most partisan trump supporters to deny the fact that this is very drastic and very unprecedented. >> it is unprecedented. look, it is being done over the objection of the intelligence community, over the objection of the justice department, his own trump appointees in the justice department and the fbi, and even senator bird, the of the senate intelligence committee says he doesn't think it is a good idea.
there's a lot of pages that look like this, and so we're going to see more parts of those pages, but more significantly there are a number of pages that have to do with the backside of what the fbi was doing, interviews that they did, some of it might be foreign intelligence from some of the partner countries overseas that provided intelligence in order to support this application for surveillance of carter page, and that is where i think democrats and others are giving pause saying that this could affect sources and methods. the president doesn't buy it. take a listen to what he had to say. >> we want transparency. what i want is i want total transparency. this is a witch hunt. republicans are seeing it. the democrats know it is a witch hunt too but they don't want to admit it because it is not good politics for them. >> and obviously the president is focussed on this investigation, which sort of gives you a hint as to why he wants this declassified. but here is the rub for the
president, right. his vow for transparency could very much come back to bite him. next year, let's say, if there's a democratic control of the house and they issue subpoenas and they demand to see some of the underlying documents of the mueller investigation, things that the president and his legal team, things that the white house do not want released because they're going to claim executive privilege or attorn attorney/client privilege, all of those things will be fair game for transparency. the president should be careful how much transparency he is asking for because it may -- he may regret this come next year. >> he likes transparency when it helps him. >> right. >> thank you very much. joining me representative eric swalwell, a democrat who septembers on the house judiciary and intelligence. i assume you see all of this as abuse of the president's powers. does it risk revealing sources and methods as evan was talking
about? >> yes, it does. we are in the thick of a lawless presidency right now where the subject of a sear yes, srious a counterintelligence investigation is leaking out information with respect to the investigation. now, if you take a step back, you remember early on in the presidency president trump accused obama officials of spying on him or abusing their power to go after trump campaign officials and he never once when challenged to declassify any evidence that would show that produced that evidence. but now here when he thinks there's even some evidence that helps him, he is trying to undermine the intelligence community. you know what, jim? he can put this out there. i have read everything he is seeking to declassify. the american people will see that there was a strong case to be made early on when this investigation started to look at the concerning contacts between donald trump, his family, his campaign and his businesses and the russians. >> so you're saying this may not be as helpful as he thinks?
you have seen it and you don't think it helps him? >> what has been helpful as president trump and devin nunes thought, they put out their memos, other carter page documents and we still see high confidence among the american people in the mueller investigation. guilty pleas are being obtained nearly every month. people are going to jail for what they did in this investigation. so, you know, he can declassify all he wants. i will just say this, jim. maybe devin nunes will follow his lead and declassify and publish all of the transcripts that the republicans told the american people they would see in the russia investigation, that they are still hiding today. >> and the president has the authority to declassify any document he wants, but do you think the justice department should comply with this? is there any mechanism that would allow them to say, no, we're not doing this? >> well, they should do all they can to protect life, and a lot of times people cooperate with the u.s. government, whether they're foreigners or americans, and they risk their lives to do so. so they shouldn't do anything
that jeopardizes someone's life just because this president wants to change the news of the day. >> and does the release of these text messages raise questions about witness intimidation? because it sounds as if the president is just seeking to release documents and texts pertaining to people that he's been lashing out at on twitter. >> you know, this president has hit bingo when it comes to all of the different, you know, post-investigation crimes would could commit from witness tampering, jury tampering, obstruction of justice, intimidation of witnesses. and, you know, while there are not republicans in congress who are willing to investigate that, the american people i think in about 49 days when they go to the polls will elect a congress that will take that seriously. i can promise you that the mueller team is also looking at this as well if they are able to do their job and follow all of the evidence. >> let me ask you about the significance of paul manafort's cooperation agreement. some legal analysts have noted that the deal would make things
difficult if he did receive a pardon from president trump. what does that tell you? >> well, it tells me that, you know, they -- paul manafort was facing a lot of time and he struck an agreement because he could provide details that could not otherwise be obtained. so i don't believe the federal investigators would have struck that agreement if they thought that, you know, paul manafort had a way, an escape clause, if you will, with the pardon. we also home that paul manafort, who was close with the russians, can fill in intelligence gaps that may exist about russian operations. hopefully it is not just cooperation with this case but just about what the russians intend to do and have done in our democracy. >> your feeling is if the president pardons paul manafort that will trigger a red line for your and other democrats in both houses of congress? >> i would just see that as, you know, another exhibit in an investigation that will take place once we have a congress that's willing to investigate this president. >> and let's turn to the
accusation of sexual assault against president trump's supreme court nominee brett kavanaugh. i know you're not in the senate obviously, but kavanaugh's accuser, as you know, christine blasey ford, she has not yet committed to the hearing that the senate judiciary republicans have scheduled for monday. the man who she says witnessed the assault, mark judge, says he will not testify. what is the appropriate next step in all of this do you think? >> well, i think it is just to slow down and, you know, right now i'm wondering, jim, what is the rush by senate republicans to try to force this through. you have a credible allegation against somebody who would have a lifetime appointment, and as a former prosecutor a number of times i worked with sexual assault victims and i saw that, you know, when they are assaulted and abused and traumatized they each handle it in a different way. but i do see different rings of truth from what's been presented so far. i also know that no sexual assault victim is given a manual the day after they're victimized and told this is how you're
supposed to handle it for the rest of your life. so the best thing we can do for the dignity of this victim is to investigate it fully and not try to rush this through just because of some arbitrary deadline that the senate has put in place. >> okay. congressman eric swalwell, thank you very much for joining us. we appreciate it. >> my pleasure. just ahead, the x-rated details in stormy daniels's new tell-all about her alleged affair with president trump. she also throws in a surprising anecdote about hillary clinton. i will ask daniels' lawyer, michael avenatti, what his client hopes to achieve with this new book. he joins us next. that is driven to provide you with better solutions for these challenging times, one that is willing to disrupt the industry, and break free from conventional thinking. (thudding) we are a different kind of financial company. we are athene, and we are driven to do more.
tonight we're getting our first look at stormy daniels's new tell-all book including salacious details about her alleged affair with president trump. the porn star claiming she was in the room when mr. trump received an unusual phone call from hillary clinton. let's go to cnn national correspondent sara sidner. you have obtained stormed's book. you how does it read? >> reporter: it is an incredible read. when she says full disclosure, she means full disclosure. the details stick in your head, the way that she has put all of these details down, but she is not just talking about her relationship with donald trump, she is not just talking about what happened afterwards with the $130,000 hush payment. she is talking about her life and there are some extremely disturbing details about what happened to her as a child. in her tell-all book, stormed writes that her first sighting
of donald trump in 2006 in his hotel suite in lake tahoe was shocking. he came swooping in wearing black silk pajamas and slippers, she writes. what are you doing, i yesterday. put some clothes on. she writes he changed and they both joked about his hair. i pointed to his hair. what's going on with this? i know, he said with a smile, it's ridiculous. she says the two talked about family, what would your wife think of you being here with me, stormy writes? oh, don't worry about that, he said, it is not a big deal. and anyway, we have separate bedrooms. she writes trump then brought out a picture of melania holding their son barron, who was just four months old at the time, and when daniels came out of the bathroom she claims trump was lying on the bed in his underwear. they had sex. she then describes his genitalia in great detail. it is distinctive in a certain way she writes, proof her attorney says she is tired of being called a liar by trump's
people. daniels says the night after her sexual encounter with trump he invited her to a club. she showed up to find trump and nfl super bowl champion ben roethlisberger talking. she writes trump eventually suggested roethlisberger walk her to her hotel room. at the door daniels writes roethlisberger asked her a question while pushing lightly on her door. how about a good night kiss? i was terrified, she writes. i am rarely terrified. he stood outside, not leaving. every now and again he would knock, grabbing his knuckles in a line low along the door. come on, he repeated in a singsong voice, i won't tell. he eventually left. cnn reached out to roethlisberger for comment. we have not heard back. but in january after a few of the details came out in "in touch" magazine roethlisberger's agent said roethlisberger was aware of it but had no intention of addressing the story. president trump has never spoken her name in public nor admitted to any sexual tryst, but his spokes people and attorneys
denied it ever happened again and again. trump and tan yells allegedly met months later at the beverly his hotel. she reveals while in his room as the two were watching tv hillary clinton called. clinton was vying for the democratic presidential nomination against barack obama. when he hung up, he was effusive about hillary. i love her, he said. she is so smart, daniel writes. fast forward almost a decade to the trump and clinton campaigns and you'd never know it. >> lying, crooked hillary. she is a liar. >> reporter: daniels also reveals she was raped as a child. she writes it happened repeatedly by a man who lived next door to one of her friends. i was nine. i was a child, and then i wasn't she writes. he was raping vanessa, so i put myself between them, continually offering myself up so he would leave her alone. daniels says a school counsellor called her a lie wrar whar when
revealed the rape. she said she was careful, she did not reveal the real name of her friend who was also raped. clearly stormy daniels wants the world to know about her, and most of the book is about her early life and her time as she spent as a porn star and how she became a director, but she certainly goes into great detail about donald trump. jim. >> sara sidner, thank you for that. joining me, stormy daniels's attorney michael avenatti. michael, thanks for joining us. let me ask you, what does your client hope to accomplish by going into this level of detail in her book, especially about the president? >> well, two things, jim. first of all, she wants the american people to learn about her life and her journey thus far in her life and learn about her background and the joy of the book is not about donald trump. it is about how she grew up and what she's been through, and i think people will be very, very moved by the book. i know the first time i read the manuscript i was very moved by it. this is an incredible woman. she has been through quite the
journey, and i think people will be very intrigued and very moved, again, like i said, when they read it. and then secondly, jim, she's included a lot of the details relating to donald trump because she's tired of being called a liar. she has been called a liar by sarah sanders repeatedly, by other people at the white house speaking on behalf of donald trump. michael cohen has repeatedly called her a liar. people that work for michael cohen who recently pled guilty of course and is a criminal, those individuals have called her a liar. >> is she just trying to get revenge with this book? is it just to embarrass the president? >> no, no, no, not at all, jim. she wants people to believe her, and she wants people to have the details so that they are more likely to believe her. and i'm anxious to see what michael cohen's response is going to be, what sarah sanders' response is going to be, what donald trump's response is going to be relating to the details in this book. are they going to come out and call my client a liar once again? i hope they do because we're
going to double down. >> and what more can you tell us about this phone call stormy daniels says she overheard between president trump and hillary clinton? because it sounds like, you know, the way the president -- i guess then citizen trump talked about hillary clinton is very different than what we heard during the campaign? >> well, i think the content of that call is consistent with what donald trump said about hillary clinton prior to deciding he wanted to run for the election in 2016. i think at one point in time he contributed to her campaign. i believe that they were at each other's family functions from time to time, weddings and things like that, and i think that this call is consistent with what donald trump said then before he started running against hillary clinton for the presidency. >> that he liked hillary clinton basically? >> yeah, basically that he liked her and he thought very highly of her. it was only until he figured out that it was to his political advantage that he turned 180 degrees and spoke otherwise. >> and what does stormy daniels'
interactions with president trump as a private citizen tell her about his fitness for office? does she get into that in the book? >> she does touch on that and she touches on the fact, for instance, that donald trump was conspiring with her or suggesting to her that he would assist her in cheating on the show "the apprentice" and would devise a strategy whereby she could stay on the show longer than she otherwise would stay on the show. i mean i think that says a lot about the lack of integrity of donald trump as a man. i mean this is an individual that lies on a consistent basis, has no qualms about lying to the american people about any number of far more important things than "the apprentice." >> and as you know, michael, michael cohen, the president's former personal attorney, has already pleaded guilty to the payment to stormy daniels. he also implicated president trump in that plea deal. do you think more charges could be coming against the trump organization or anyone else? what can you tell us about that? >> i do anticipate that there's
going to be additional charges. i don't think that prosecutors are close to being done yet relating to bringing additional charges, and at some point michael cohen owes my client an apology for calling her a liar and for sending out people like david schwartz and other lawyers to come on your network and other networks and call my client a liar. i think this book firmly establishes my client is telling the truth. >> she wants to set the record straight, that's where she's doing this book? >> absolutely. and if people have facts, if michael cohen, donald trump or sarah sanders and others have facts that undercut the facts and the evidence in this book, well, let them come forward right now and let's have an educated discussion about it. >> michael avenatti, thank you very much for joining us. we appreciate it. just ahead, will brett kavanaugh's accuser appear before the senate on monday, and what happens to the confirmation process if she doesn't. also, live to carolinas and a city bracing more flooding days after florence hit.
with dell small business technology advisors, you get the one-on-one partnership to grow your business. the dell vostro 14 laptop. get up to 40% off on select pcs. call 877-buy-dell today. ( ♪ ) call 877-buy-dell today. you wouldn't accept from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase relieves your worst symptoms including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. most pills only block one. flonase. - anncr: as you grow older, -your brain naturally begins to change which may cause trouble with recall. - learning from him is great... when i can keep up! - anncr: thankfully, prevagen helps your brain and improves memory. - dad's got all the answers. - anncr: prevagen is now the number-one-selling brain health supplement in drug stores nationwide. - she outsmarts me every single time. - checkmate! you wanna play again? - anncr: prevagen. healthier brain. better life.
and we're back with breaking news. the president continuing to stand by his supreme court nominee as brett kavanaugh faces allegations of sexual assault when he was in high school. tonight it is not clear if his abuser, christine blasey ford, will testify at a planned senate hearing on monday. let's bring in our analysts. jeffrey tu jeffrey toobin, i will turn to you first.
the president was uncharacteristically toned town when he made comments earlier today, but one thing that stood out to me was he said he felt sorry for brett kavanaugh. he could not use the name christine blasey ford. again, it seemed a situation where the president stands with the accused and not the accuser. it just seems to be a pattern. >> it is a pattern starting with himself, who is a multiple-accused abuser of women. you know, he said he felt sorry for brett kavanaugh here, having to deal with the accusation. of course, no sympathy for the alleged victim. but, you know, the fact remains that if she doesn't show up on monday, this confirmation is going through. even though the republicans have set up a structure that is very much rigged to help brett kavanaugh with no other witnesses, in other investigation, it is really a take-it-or-leave-it proposition for her.
we will see if she takes it. >> rebecca berg, jeffrey does make a good point. because if you are christine blasey ford and what they're telling you is all you can have is a one-on-one sort of trial with brett kavanaugh, that may not sound as enticing as having supporting witnesses, as perhaps subpoenaing mark judge, the friend who allegedly was there at the time for this incident and so on. >> right. >> i suppose perhaps at this point it is not too surprising we have not heard yet from ford as to whether she is going to do this. >> right. i mean this is a huge decision for any person to have to make, jim, but especially when you consider that this woman is a private citizen who didn't necessarily want or invite all of this attention. she had what she felt was a very important piece of information that she wanted to share with the senators as they considered their decision, and now faces this choice of should she put herself in the national spotlight. already, you know, we've heard
reports she has had to leave her home, that she's staying elsewhere, that her kids are staying elsewhere, she's off of social media. the scrutiny and the pressure on someone who is, again, a private citizen, it is extremely intense. you could see why she would take her time making this decision. >> david swerdlick, i mean she does potentially, would be setting the stage to become sort of the next anita hill, who was the accuser during the clarence thomas saga, and anita hill did resurface to write something in "the new york times", saying that the senate judiciary committee still has a property call for vetoing sexual harassment, suggesting that they have learned little from the thomas hearing much less the recent me too movement. anita hill has a point here in that it seems we have this archaic system for dealing with these sort of accusations in a supreme court nomination
process. >> yeah, i think professor hill is write that the senate is ill-equipped in some ways to do this. i think she is also right that this could be a sort of circus atmosphere that is not, as rebecca was saying, particularly fair or charitable to a private citizen who by all accounts didn't want their name to be out there. now that dr. ford's name is out there and now that she has told her story to my "washington post" colleagues, now that this is heading toward this sort of in theory conclusion on monday, i think it doesn't serve her interests not to tell her story because the court of public opinion will judge her harshly if she now doesn't speak up and tell her story, even though she faces incredible consequences about this. i don't see how it is in her interests to stay silent. >> and there's a lot of pressure on dr. ford at this point, isn't there, sam vinaigrette? >> there is, but it is an unfair set of choices for dr. ford. she either has to show up and testify on monday, which is a
short amount of time to prepare for a hearing before the senate judiciary committee, or she won't show up and will know her accuser will be appointed to the supreme court. so this is really a rigged system, as anita hill points out in her op-ed. some things have changed since 1991. there is a heightened focus on sexual assault. the courts have had 17 more years to look at sexual assault cases and sexual harassment. but what hasn't change is that the accuser is still being put on trial on monday, if this goes forward, with no witnesses, and when the outcome almost seems predetermined. so while some conditions have changed since 1991, the forecast for anybody that comes forward with a sexual assault claim in this kind of process remains exactly the same. >> jeffrey -- >> and let -- >> go ahead, jeffrey. >> let's focus on the absurdity of this process. there is a third person who is alleged to have been in the room, mark judge. in any rational fact-finding process he would be called to
testify. his lawyer sends a letter today saying, oh, he would prefer not to testify. well, that's very interesting, but there's something called a subpoena that in a normal investigative procedure he would be subpoenaed. the republicans would say, well, it is very nice you don't want to testify, but we have subpoena power, get in here and testify on monday. but the republicans in the senate, they don't want him to testify. they don't want more evidence. they don't want a real investigation. so they're not going to -- they're not going to subpoena him. it is just indicative of what a kangaroo court this is. >> david -- >> i just want to follow up on something sam said. i agree it is not fair to dr. ford the onus is put on her here, but i don't think the onus is on her, jim, to determine the fate of judge kavanaugh's nomination. i simply think the onus is on her now that she is out there in the public to tell the truth as she sees it or as she knows it. we're here, broadly speaking, with judge kavanaugh on the supreme court because there was
an election in 2016, because president trump is the president, because there's a republican-controlled congress, because in terms of the way this process has been handled senators both sides of the aisle have allowed this to become a circus-like atmosphere. >> i want to play this piece of video that came in this afternoon that shows brett kavanaugh in 2015 talking about what happens at georgetown prep staying at georgetown prep. not a very helpful sound bite for him, but let's play it. >> fortunately we had a good saying we held firm to do this day as the dean was reminding me before, before the talk, which is what happens at georgetown prep stays at georgetown prep. that's been a good thing for all of us i think. >> what do you make of that, rebecca? >> well, obviously in that context, jim, he was making a joke and you could see where that would be funny in a normal context. but now, of course, we're hearing that sound byte in a very different context. it makes him sound flip planpan.
you could apply it to the certainly things and it sounds nefarious but he didn't mean it in that context. >> mark judge has written not one but two books about being a blackout alcoholic at georgetown prep at the time when according to ms. blasey the assault took place by two drunken students. i mean it doesn't prove anything in an of itself, but it is circumstantial evidence that if you were doing an actual serious investigation you would figure into the process. >> samantha, what do you think the president's team is doing right now as christine blasey ford is trying to decide what they should do? obviously what we saw from the president earlier today was, i mean, the president has been holding back somewhat. we have been talking about that over the last 24 hours. >> for now. >> exactly, for now. but he did sound like he was getting more aggressive in his posture, blaming this on dine feinstein, saying that the democrats, all they want to do
is obstruct and resist. it sounds as if the white house, after being pushed back on their heels yesterday, is sort of getting their act together, getting their talking points together, and all the while brett kavanaugh is going over to the white house and prepping for this hearing on monday. >> exactly. i think the president's team is probably praying that the president doesn't tweet anything malicious against the accuser because, remember, when he is backed into a corner typically his strategy is to try to malign the victim and the accuser, to say they're lying. in his comments today, he was restrained for now and that's probably because he -- or maybe because he has a daughter, he has a wife. that hasn't stopped him before, so i think, jim, it is probably just a matter of time before he says something about the character of dr. ford. i think it is just a waiting game. >> okay. all right. we are waiting to find out what happens with dr. ford's decision in all of this. thank you very much, all of you. just ahead, the storm has passed but not the danger. we will go live to north carolina where rivers are bursting and floodwaters are
rising, and kim jong-un is pa raileding warmer relations with south korea and his higher profile in the world. we will get insights from cnn's will ripley who is just back from pyongyang. if you're waiting patiently for a liver transplant, it could cost you your life. it's time to get out of line with upmc. at upmc, living-donor transplants put you first. so you don't die waiting. upmc does more living-donor liver transplants
than any other center in the nation. find out more and get out of line today. havi is not always easy. plaque psoriasis it's a long-distance journey, and you have the determination to keep going. humira has a proven track record of being prescribed for over 10 years. humira works inside the body to target and help block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to symptoms. most adults taking humira were clear or almost clear and many saw 75% and even 90% clearance in just 4 months. and the kind of clearance that can last. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal, infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. join over 250,000 patients who have chosen humira.
that are already catastrophic. 32 deaths are being blamed on florence and fema is warning the next 48 hours are extremely critical. polo sandoval is in lumberton, north carolina. tell us about the impact of the flooding. what are you seeing there? >> i think what we're seeing is attention shifting from rescues to protecting infrastructures that is in the path of floodwaters. the water you see here, this murky water, this is the retention pond. this is water that continues to drain from the western and southern parts of the cities, parts devastated by hurricane matthew about two years ago. it's being pumped at over 100,000 gallons of water a minute into the river, over the levy that protected this city only days ago after all that water poured into the region here. here's the idea. what they're hoping to do is basically move all the
floodwaters in the city away from the water treatment plant. that's been a main concern because two years ago after hurricane matthews, that facility was flooded and disabled for 30 days. residents had to have water trucked into the area. so they created a makeshift dam if it were, and it seems it's stabilized according to sources on the ground. but that's basically what we're seeing throughout the northeast. we're seeing towns especially trying to protect their water from the floodwater, jim. >> how long are these conditions expected to last? >> reporter: we certainly expect other neighboring rivers to continue to crest. for example, this is the lumber river i'm told this crested at about 25 feet yesterday and dropped only three inches, that's obviously going to be an issue because it has closed down some of the main parts around town, for example, the bridge.
those will be part of the lasting effects. i-95, an important interstate that cuts through the state, that has been shut down here in lumberton for the last couple days. i'm told it will not reopen until the river drops to 21 feet. it's currently still flowing at 25. it could be days before the water reaches that level again. >> we hope things start moving in the right direction where you are. just ahead, kim jong-un put osa show of warmth tom welcome south korea's leader to pyongyang. but what's really going on behind the hugs and the smiles? ♪ just take me with you there are roadside attractions. and then there's our world-famous on-road attraction. the 2019 glc. lease the glc300 for just $469 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer.
mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. what i just introduced you worto my parents.g? psst! craig and sheila broke up. what, really? craig and shelia broke up!? no, craig!? what happened? i don't know. is she okay? ♪ craig and sheila broke up! craig and sheila!? ♪ as long as office gossip travels fast, you can count on geico saving folks money. craig and sheila broke up! what!? fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.
oh! oh! ♪ ozempic®! ♪ (vo) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than seven and maintained it. oh! under seven? (vo) and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study, adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? (vo) a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. oh! no increased risk? ♪ ozempic®! ♪ ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck,
severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase the risk for low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i discovered the potential with ozempic®. ♪ oh! oh! oh! ozempic®! ♪ (vo) ask your healthcare provider if ozempic® is right for you. and i don't add up the years. but what i do count on is boost®. delicious boost® high protein nuritional drink now has 33% more protein, along with 26 essential vitamins and minerals boost® high protein. be up for life.
tonight kim jong-un is hosting the leader of south korea for their third summit this year and putting on quite a show in the process. at the same time the state media has been blaming the trump administration for stalled talks between the u.s. and north korea. will ripley is back after his 19th reporting in north korea. tell us about the summit. >> the images coming out of pyongyang are extraordinary. but all foreign media was kicked out for reasons we really don't know. but to see kim jong-un and moon jae-in, the president of south korea, the leader of north korea, standing out of the sunroof of an armored, you know, black mercedes that kim jong-un rolls around town is is
stunning. not to mention, they mobilized 100,000 people to stand and cheer for the president of south korea and their leader. there's no other place in the world people can be told show up and they'll be here. now they have to get down to business today. there are important things they're going to be talking about. this is their third summit this year. moon has basically assumed the role of mediator between north korea and the u.s. he's the one trying to talk to both sides to bridge the huge divide on denuclearization that exists. i was in pyongyang a few days ago and they told me something that under scores the difference. the north koreans think a peace treaty should have happened decades ago. and they don't feel they should give up anything in exchange. where the usa feels the peace treaty is one of the biggest things they have to offer. and should be given up after north korean has given up their
weapons. so how do you get the two sides together is one big challenge facing president moon jae-in and he has to fee up trump/kim round two sometime later this year. because they're blasting conservative lawmakers in the united states, this is continuing that messaging and belief inside north korea. they feel president trump is the only person they can sit down with at the table and get the talks back on track and get a deal more favorable to pyongyang than what they felt secretary of state mike pompeo offered in the disappointing trip in july. >> it seems as though kim jong-un is trying to manipulate the message here. this is all carefully choreographed, isn't that right? >> reporter: absolutely. because they're trying to show peace, show harmony with seoul and yet they're blasting washington. and that brings us the issue is north korea trying to drive a wedge between the united states and south korea, and is it
working? there's a lot of concern inside the administration it might be looking at pictures like that. >> i'm jim acosta. thank you for watching. erin burnett "outfront" starts right now. up next, limbo, a hearing that could change the course of history is set for monday but will the woman accusing brett kavanaugh of sexual assault be there? plus cavanaugh's high school friend and defender. she was not a witness, so why is she so sure he didn't do it? we're going to ask her. the florida senate race, one of the most expensive in the country. can republican rick scott get away with keeping his old front trump at arm's length. we're going to ask him. i'm jim sciutto in for erin burnett. the public hearing into the alleged brett k