tv Cuomo Prime Time CNN July 3, 2019 9:00pm-10:00pm PDT
wanna take your xfi now you can with xfi advantage. giving you enhanced performance and protection. when devices are connected to your home's wifi, they're protected. helping keep outsiders from getting inside. and if someone tries, we'll let you know. so you can stream, surf and game all you want, with confidence you can get coverage where you need it most. that's xfi advantage. make your xfi even better. upgrade today. call, click or visit a store.
good evening. we begin tonight with breaking news to report on the citizenship question the president appears determined to keep on the 2020 census. yesterday it was definitely off the upcoming census, but now the president says it's going back on, maybe. even the justice department attorneys who are arguing with a maryland federal judge today, they didn't sound sure. however, speaker nancy pelosi today told house democrats in a letter today that, no matter what happens, if the president does try, they may hold the administration, quote, in contempt of congress on the census. originally, the administration said it needed this question to safeguard the voting rights act. keeping them honest, emails between the justice department and commerce secretary wilbur ross undercut that narrative.
last week, the supreme court called their backstory contrived. however, the court left open a narrow window to add the question. they just needed to come up with a better backstory and by monday, not next monday, the one two days ago. you see, unlike subpoenas for tax returns, the census isn't something the administration can hold up. so, on tuesday, both commerce and justice said, all right, it's over, there will be no question about citizenship on the census. and thus, the saga seemed to be over, until this morning when president trump tweeted this -- "the news reports about the department of commerce dropping its quest to put the citizenship question on the census is incorrect, or to state it differently, fake! we're absolutely moving forward, as we must, because of the importance of the answer to this question." now, as i said, this has come as a complete surprise to everyone, including the government's own attorneys. one told a maryland federal judge this afternoon during a teleconference -- and i quote -- "i do not have a deeper understanding of what that means at this juncture, other than what the president has tweeted."
a different justice attorney did say, "there may be a legally available path under the supreme court's decision" and that they had been instructed to go to the supreme court if they find it. however, that first attorney, quote, confirmed the census is still being printed without the question. now, at one point, the judge, who wants a more definitive answer from the government attorneys by 2:00 p.m. friday, lashed out at the president's itchy twitter finger. he told the government's attorneys, "if you were facebook and an attorney for facebook told me one thing and then i read a press release from mark zuckerberg telling me something else, i would be demanding that mark zuckerberg appear in court with you the next time, because i would be saying, i don't think you speak for your client anymore." one of the attorneys representing the people who brought this suit suggested there is a point to all of this chaos -- "the president's tweet has some of the same effects that the addition of the question would have. it leaves the immigrant communities to believe that the government is still after information that could endanger
them." in other words, this person's opinion, no matter what the final decision is, the damage to the credibility of the census, that may already have been done. joining me now is jeffrey toobin, cnn chief legal analyst and former prosecutor maggie haberman, political analyst and correspondent for "the new york times." you're in it so much it seems like the maggie times. can you explain, maggie, what is going on here? >> no, and neither could -- i'm in the same position -- i mean, yes, i can. but frankly, what the doj attorney said is where things are. >> right, fact that the department of justice attorney says to the judge, well, beyond -- i have no idea what's going on except for what the president just tweeted. >> yeah, your understanding's as good as mine, judge, is essentially what that lawyer was saying. what i have heard from people inside the administration throughout the day is the president, for whatever reason, either did not accept or did not fully understand what his staff was saying about not going forward with this, saw news conference, reacted to it tweeting they're going ahead, has been talking all day about how they're going to try to find some way to move ahead with
this, whether it was drafting some kind of executive order or whether it was having -- he told some people he would have the question added to the census, even though the questionnaires are being printed without this question. so, it's not clear exactly what he's talking about, but he is determined to find a way ahead. i did hear from people inside the administration making the very point that was made a second ago about how, you know, this is going to serve the same purpose that that question would have -- >> right, it's going to scare people who are undocumented from participating in the census. >> correct. and there are people around the president who are well aware of that. >> and also, it seems to serve another purpose for the president just politically, which is, even if he loses on it, it goes nowhere, he can say, you know, i championed this, i fought for this, and these, you know, politically correct census bureaucrats wouldn't do it. >> correct, and we've seen him say this a number of times. also he's frustrated with wilbur ross and has been at various points over the last year. i don't think ross is going anywhere, but again, he would point to people on his staff disappointing him, as we've seen
over and over. >> wilbur ross has those slippers, though, etched with the commerce seal. >> i don't think -- >> that's not going to do it? >> i don't think it will reverse the president's feelings about this. >> jeff, i mean, from a legal standpoint, is this done? >> i mean, first of all from a legal standpoint, it's important to point out how surreal all of this is, because you know, the united states government often takes positions in court, and there's something called the interagency process, where it is worked out what the position of the united states is. >> that sounds so boring. >> it is so boring, except the department of justice can only have one position in court. i mean, you know, it makes -- >> that's in the olden days. >> that's the olden days. but what's obvious, if you read the transcript, is that there was an interagency process, and the commerce department and the justice department agreed that they were throwing in the towel. i mean, they said that in court. and the idea that the president says it's fake -- it's his own government that said that.
>> wilbur ross said it publicly, too. >> right. >> this is across the board, this is what was happening. >> so, then this tweet comes out of left field, and you know, as a former government lawyer, i really felt for the lawyers, and at the lawyers are like, i don't know. you know, i mean, we don't know where things stand at this point. and you know, it is possible -- i thought there was some root to the back to the supreme court to try to get the census question back on, but the justice department obviously thought that was not the case. and what makes this even more bizarre is that if you look at what the president is saying and has been saying about the census, his justification is not the justification that the government has offered. the one that chief justice roberts said was a pretext, was phony. the real one is discriminatory, as the president is acknowledging. so, i don't know where this goes from here. >> so what you seem to be saying is that the president has said
this is a fake story, but that's actually not true. is that what you're saying, that the president is actually not telling the truth about something being fake? wow. >> i know. >> wow. but i mean, this is -- you know, a lot of people's eyes glaze over when they talk about the census. the census is very important. i mean, the census determines where funds go, where money goes to local governments and state governments. it determines representation in our government. >> well, and -- yes. i mean, you know, it decides how many congress members there are from each state and how the state legislatures are also divided up. and what makes this sinister and what makes the reason for this lawsuit is that it has appeared from the very beginning, is that the trump administration wants fewer people of color counted so that they don't get resources
from the government and they are not represented in the government. so, it does sound boring. it does sound technical, but this is about discrimination against people of color, period. >> and just -- maggie, to reiterate what you're hearing from people around the president or in the administration or supporters -- it may have that impact, even if that question is not on the census. it just has a chilling effect among particularly people of color, if they worry that they're going to be asked about or that this is somehow secretly the government is trying to figure out are they documented or not. >> not everybody in the government will say that, but there certainly are some people in the administration who will acknowledge that this will very likely have the exact same effect, or if not the exact same, certainly a similar effect that having the question on in the first place would, which is chilling response to this, making people concerned about participating. it creates underrepresentation to the type that jeffrey's talking about, without actually having the question on it. anyway, i don't think that the president himself is necessarily planning for that.
i think it's more what you were saying before, where he says look, i championed this, i'm going to go ahead with this, i don't like quitting, but at the end of the day, net effect is close to the same. >> it isn't funny, but it is a joke that we are now living in a world where you just have to disregard what the president of the united states says. i mean, the levers of government will basically just have to disregard -- people just disregard it. >> but -- >> go ahead. >> the doj lawyers are in court saying, actually, we're trying to deal with this. i'm not sure they're disregarding it. i think if any, this is one of the times where you're seeing -- we have often seen in the last two years the president is at odds with his administration on any number of issues, but they have found a way to kind of spackle that and you don't really see it. they find a way to paper over it. this is happening in realtime where you have government lawyers saying i don't know what he's talking about and we're trying to deal with it. >> well, they're going to have a great fourth of july, because they're going to be in court and writing papers in their offices. >> they'll miss the tanks. >> well, you know, they may stick around for the tanks, who knows? jeff toobin, maggie, thanks. stay with us.
maggie has more reporting, including on tomorrow's presidential event. and coming up next, a pediatrician inside migrant detention facilities and what she says the people responsible are not doing while kids suffer. keeping them honest. and what african-american voters in south carolina make of senator kamala harris. what appears to be a whole new primary race. we'll be right back. with advil liqui-gels, what stiff joints? what bad back? advil is... relief that's fast. strength that lasts. you'll ask... what pain? with advil liqui-gels.
we run right into these crises, and we do not leave until normalcy is restored. we'd been working for days on a site in a storm devastated area. a family pulled up. it was a mom and her kids. everything they had had been washed away. the only thing that brought any kind of solace was the ability to hand her a device so she could call her family and let them know that she was okay. (vo) there for you when it matters most. join us and get up to $650 when you switch. that's verizon. has been excellent. they really appreciate the military family and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today.
♪ if you have moderate to thsevere rheumatoid arthritis, month after month, the clock is ticking on irreversible joint damage. ongoing pain and stiffness are signs of joint erosion. humira can help stop the clock. prescribed for 15 years, humira targets and blocks a source of inflammation that contributes to joint pain and irreversible damage. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections
including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. help stop the clock on further irreversible joint damage. talk to your rheumatologist. right here. right now. humira. or psoriatic arthritis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats differently. for psoriasis, 75% clearer skin is achievable, with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques. for psoriatic arthritis, otezla is proven to reduce joint swelling, tenderness, and pain. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement
for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ready to treat differently with a pill? otezla. show more of you. the president of the united states has a message tonight for migrant children and others in overcrowded border detention centers and everyone who's concerned about them -- "many of these illegals -- aliens -- are living far better now than where they came from and in far safer conditions." that's what the president tweeted earlier. you might say, well, at least he seems to be acknowledging that many of these human beings in detention fled from unsafe conditions in their homes, in their home countries.
what he actually means, of course, is, quit complaining. and to the kids in cages without soap or toothbrushes or any clear idea of what's going to happen to them or if they're going to see their families again, seems like the message from the president's basically, kids, suck it up, it's not that bad. keeping them honest, we should underscore that custody means "in care of," not just detained by. custody implies responsibility, accountability, and a duty to care. it also should be pointed out that not only do the reports of substandard conditions come from lawmakers visiting the detention centers, not only do they come from pediatricians, one of whom you'll meet in a moment, they also come from the department of homeland security's own inspector general's office and from a veteran cbp agent who compares conditions to a zoo. this agent spoke to cnn's nick valencia on condition of a.m. anonymity and was clearly haunted by what people are only now just learning about. >> i feel like, you know, multiple times during our
interview, you've sort of stared off in the distance and you've thought about some things that you've seen. i mean, it seems as though there are things that you might take home with you. >> every day. >> reporter: like what? >> the kids. >> reporter: what about the kids? >> you know, they just want hope. they want to believe in something. they want a future. >> well, today we got a look into some of those kids' lives. the pictures you're seeing were drawn last week by three children, ages 10 and 11, at a catholic charities center in texas after being released by customs and border protection. the staff at the center asked the kids to depict their time in custody and the social worker gave the drawings to the american academy of pediatrics, which gave them to cnn. they show cages or bars with unhappy looking figures inside. some of them show people outside the cages staring at them. appears to be kids sleeping on the floor, and sadly, they're
not just silent testimony to what it's like to be a child in detention, they also represent the memories these kids may always carry with them of overcrowding and disease and lack of drinking water and shortage of medical care. the president tweeted, "if illegal immigrants are unhappy with the conditions in the quickly built or refitted detention centers, just tell them not to come. all problems solved!" so, that was about 45 minutes after a string of other tweets that began -- and again, i'm quoting from the president -- "our border patrol people are not hospital workers, doctors or nurses. many of these illegals, aliens, are living far better now than where they came from and in far safer conditions. no matter how good things actually look, even if perfect, the democrat visitors will act shocked and aghast at how terrible things are." the president's words, as we all get ready to celebrate the fourth of july. now, we mentioned that dhs inspector general report. take a look at these photos, because these photos are from the dhs report. these photos are from the
government, and this report describes dangerous overcrowding, standing room only in places, children packed side by side on the floor with no space between them, unsanitary conditions. and i'm quoting now from the inspector general, the department of homeland security, i'm quoting -- "most single adults had not had a shower in cbp custody, despite several being held for as long as a month. at some facilities, border patrol was giving detainees wet wipes to maintain personal hygiene." wet wipes. again, that's not coming from partisan politicians or activists or anyone with preconceptions or axes to grind. that's a direct quote from the inspector general's office at the president's own department of homeland security. and the report is not titled, as the president suggests, "illegals: they've never had it so good." the actual title is -- listen to this -- "management alert: dhs needs to address dangerous overcrowding and prolonged detention of children and adults in the rio grande valley."
that's due in no small part to the influx of asylum seekers from central american countries where conditions are certainly bad, but the trump administration policy has also played a big role. instead of finding ways to process more asylum seekers, bring more judges on, the administration has taken steps to make it harder for them -- longer waits, less chance of actually getting asylum. when death row inmates in federal prisons get better medical care than a 5-year-old in a federal detention facility, when prisoners of war under the geneva convention get better toiletries, when conditions are bad enough for a senior manager at a border facility to call it, quote, a ticking time bomb, there is a simple humanitarian problem. it has nothing to do with the complexities to do with asylum seekers and building a wall. this is in the end about human beings and how we treat them. jong us, dr. colleen kraft, former president of the american academy of pediatrics, which obtained the drawings you saw
from the three migrant kids. dr. cavity craft, when you see these drawings as a professional, what do you see? what do they tell you about what these kids are going through? >> well, anderson, we use art therapy as a way to help out kids who have been through traumatic experiences. and kids will draw what they see, and they draw what scares them, and they draw you the reality of what's happened in their lives. so, this really gives a very distinct picture of what these kids have been going through. >> so kids that age -- 10, 11 is the age of these kids, i believe it was -- they can't necessarily express their feelings, but they can draw them out? >> absolutely. even younger kids can draw out their feelings, and they can, depending on their own skill and artwork, can really put forth some very powerful images. >> you know, there's a lot of people who see this and say, look, kids are resilient. kids go through bad things all the time and they're able to bounce back, they're resilient.
is that the case here? i mean, does this really have some sort of long-lasting impact on a child, being detained in a cage with lots of other people, not knowing where your parent is? >> so, you ask a really very important and fundamental scientific question. what we know is that different types of stress affect the brain and can cause resilience or can cause trauma. so, what these kids are experiencing is something called toxic stress, and that is unmitigated cortisol, fight-or-flight hormones, the types of hormones that actually disrupt brain development. and for a 10-year-old or an 11-year-old, they're just beginning to develop their frontal lobe, their executive function, their ability to work through complex problems, and their basic mental health. and so, this can lead to a lot of trouble in learning and to mental health problems. >> you know, it's interesting, because in adults, you know, if you're a marine and you go through an incredibly traumatic experience overseas, you may end
up with post-traumatic stress disorder, and goodness knows we've certainly seen people with that. and if you, whether you've seen loved ones die or you've -- just, whatever the traumatic experience is, it can affect an adult for the rest of their life. you're saying kids' brains are still developing, so does it have more of an impact or -- i mean, you're -- essentially, it sounds like what you're saying is this experience could be, you know, traumatic enough that it stays with a kid or changes the course of their life. >> you're absolutely right. so, we know that a traumatic experience for a child -- if that child is with an adult who can provide safety and security, they often will become resilient. but when children go through these traumatic experiences alone, that is when toxic stress can affect their brain development and cause post-traumatic stress disorder as well as other mental health and learning problems. >> the american academy of
pediatrics worked with customs and border patrol, i understand, on a series of recommendations intended to help the children in these shelters. can you just walk us through what those recommendations were as well as, you know, tell us, were they actually implemented? >> so, we recommended that there be pediatric expertise to train and monitor the health care workers at the border and that we have unfettered access to the centers to look at the conditions, advise on the conditions, and keep a check on the health and safety of children. one of the things that did happen was that the american academy of pediatrics was asked to put together a training videotape for the customs and border protection medical workers, and we did that. and that is part of their training. but we're asking for more. pediatricians need to be there in these centers taking care of these children, monitoring the conditions and training the personnel who work day to day with these kids. >> and that's not happening? >> that hasn't happened. >> so, they're not allowing
pediatricians, doctors, in the centers full time to help the kids and help train people? >> they have not. we have worked with them, and they recently had a group of our leadership go down and tour one of the centers, and that's where these drawings came from. >> yeah. >> but we're not on the ground taking care of the kids or training the people who are. >> wow. >> and we need to be there. >> dr. kraft, i appreciate your time. thank you. i turn next to the former mayor of san antonio, texas, julio castro, hud secretary and current presidential candidate. you heard what dr. kraft said. does it make any sense that the administration would not take all of the recommendations and not have pediatricians, you know, available for these kids full time, if they're willing to go? it seems nuts. >> well, it absolutely does. just like the other day when we found out that a lot of these kids are not being given something as basic as soap or a toothbrush, even though a few months ago the president had found, all of a sudden out of
nowhere, an extra $1 billion that he wants to put toward a wall, but now they're saying that these little children can't have soap or toothbrushes. none of it makes sense, and this comes from a dark heart of cruelty of this president and the administration. so, folks might wonder, what can we do right now? folks can support organizations that are representing families tied up in this entire process, but ultimately, we need to end the detention of these children and these families. but right now, the government could invest more in making sure that they locate family members. because remember, a lot of these children have family members that live in the united states somewhere. they can locate the family members and vet them a lot more quickly to place them with those family members so they're not staying so long in these facilities. >> in terms of the president today saying that migrants in custody, quote, are living far better now than where they came from, i'm wondering what went through your mind when you heard that?
>> that's not america. think about throughout the generations. think about what this president is saying. a lot of these migrants are from central america, but if we went back in our history, these folks are fleeing desperate circumstances. that's the same with people who were fleeing a famine in ireland or fleeing danger in europe during world war ii or cubans who were fleeing the castro regime. people are fleeing desperate circumstances, and this country has been at its greatest when it welcomes them in. and he always talks about, you know, trying to make america great again. i guess what he's talking about is going backward. well, what they did in the past was that we had this checkered history of how we treated people that were trying to come here, but when they got here, those waves of immigrants made this country stronger and stronger and made it the special nation
that it is, and those little children and their parents are no different, no different with the same hopes, the same dreams, the same ambition, and also, they look at america the same way, as a land of opportunity, as a place that can help make them safer and where they can pursue their dreams. that is what's added to the greatness of this country. and so, this president is making a terrible mistake. he has completely failed in terms of moral leadership, and we need to end with his cruelty and choose common sense and compassion instead. >> the former acting i.c.e. director spoke to wolf earlier today about the situation on the border. i just want to play some of what he said. >> i believe congress has to act. we need to put ourselves in a situation where people can have their due process while they're in custody so they can be removed. >> congress has to kt a, but the president has to act as well. >> the president's done everything -- he's used all the tools he has at his disposal. >> there's nothing else he can do? >> i don't believe so.
>> what do you make of that? how much of this responsibility falls on the shoulders of members of congress? >> i think that congress is trying to do what it can. this president is absolutely dead set on making conditions worse for these children and for their families, has no interest in making it better. and the reason for that is that he's using them. he's using them as a political pinata to try and shore up his base as he gets ready for re-election. he thinks that demonstrating this kind of cruelty is going to rile up his base and stoke the fear and the paranoia that he wants to ride to re-election in a narrow electoral college victory in 2020. that's how he started his campaign in 2015. it's how he thinks he won in 2016. and that's his strategy for 2020. so i don't think this president has any interests in making it better. >> to those who, you know, heard you at the debate talking about, you know, not making a criminal offense but a civil offense.
some people have said you're for open borders. what would your answer be to that? i mean, how do you stop people from crossing illegally into the country? how do you stop so many people from trying to get asylum? >> well, we would treat it the way that we treated it from the late 1920s until about 2004. this is not something that's radical. this is the way that we used to do it. we used to treat this as a civil mission instead of a criminal. open borders is just a right-wing talking point. we still have 654 miles of fencing. we have thousands of personnel at the border. we have planes, we have helicopters, we have boats, we have security cameras, we have guns. texas, my home state, puts an extra $800 million into border security. so, by no stretch of the imagination can somebody call that open borders. that's just a right-wing talking point. instead of his failure, this president's failure, though, what we need to do is, of course, maintain a secure
border, but choose common sense and compassion and not this cruelty toward children that don't deserve it. >> secretary castro, it's to be continued. i appreciate your time. thank you. >> good to be with you. coming up next, the president's military event tomorrow and what some military commanders are saying about it. maggie haberman's back with that reporting in just a few minutes. hey, who are you? oh, hey jeff, i'm a car thief... what?! i'm here to steal your car because, well, that's my job. what? what?? what?! (laughing) what?? what?! what?! [crash] what?! haha, it happens. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, paying for this could feel like getting robbed twice. so get allstate... and be better protected from mayhem... like me. ♪
please sir. there must be something you can do... son.. my father is going. my brothers too. i'd rather die than stay... son, you can't. your heart's not strong enough. my heart is as strong as any. ♪ ...you have to let me go. uncover the lost chapters of your family history with ancestry. get started for free at ancestry.com
washington is now just hours away from the kind of display that another president, five-star general dwight eisenhower didn't approve of. he didn't believe in showing off missiles and tanks the way the soviet union did. in 1959, he told the nation, if my message to you on the fourth of july could be put into one message, it would be state the facts and trust in god as we have done. 60 years later, president trump
wrote "the cost of our salute will be little compared to what it's worth. we own the planes, we have the pilots. the airport is right next door, all we need is the fuel. we own tanks and all. fireworks are donated by two of the greats. nice!" the problem is not having to do with owning the tanks or not, it's the message they send along with the presence of troops and commanders at the president's event tomorrow, something a number of general eisenhower's successors, including active-duty officers have been talking about, including to "the new york times." maggie haberman is with us. she shares a byline on the story and is cnn political analyst and joins us now. so, what are you hearing? is there concern in the white house about this event? >> the concern in the white house is not so much about the use of military or about the fact that the president has been focused on this kind of a display, basically since the bastille day celebration two years ago in france that he saw. it's that there won't be crowds. he wants there to be a huge turnout. he wants this to be, you know, a mega event. and as of a week ago, week and a half ago, i was hearing from people that the planning was very behind.
there's already a lot of finger-pointing in advance going on in anticipation of problems. so, there might be bad weather. there might not be as many people as might come by otherwise because of the security concerns, so there's -- >> traditionally, a lot of people go out to the mall for fourth of july in washington. it's legendary. >> it is. it's not traditionally like this. and so, the concern for some within the administration, or the white house, is, is this going to be the inauguration all over again, where the president wants historic crowds and then is somehow disappointed? >> and the president, you said, has been focusing on this since he was in france two years ago. i mean, how much time is he devoting to this? >> he's devoting a lot. look at the proportion of his tweets compared to other topics. he's been incredibly excited about this, talking about it with a lot of people, very involved in the layout and the design. he likes putting on shows. this is what he's doing. remember, he's wanted, actually, some form of a military display since his inauguration. he looked at the possibility of that being part of the inaugural parade. he was told no, the streets
couldn't take it in d.c., the military equipment. this is some compromise version of it. he's very excited about this. >> in terms of the military thrill, the president claiming that, being ordered to participate in this, is that what you found? >> no, we've heard that there are a lot of people in the military who have concerns about this, for all of the reasons you just cited. this is not the first time in u.s. history that somebody in authority has used aspects of the military, but this is a very dramatic display by a president who has flouted all kinds of norms and laws, in some cases, and who has, you know, played very nice with autocrats who often use other displays of military power and that sets off concerns. >> autocrats are often sending a message not only to the world, but to their own people about their power. i'm not clear the message the president intends to send is. is he planning on having military members stand next to him during the fly-overs?
>> it's not clear on that and i don't think we'll have clarity on that until closer to the event tomorrow because i think there is resistance to it. it's not clear what the message is, except something about strength, an attribute he values above all else. >> he gave a speech in south korea recently, which was supposed to be not a political speech. it was to troops. and yet, he went into politics, bashed the democrats, said that they were against the military and for open borders. this is supposedly going to be a non-partisan speech, but i mean, who knows? >> he has one speech that he gives in basically every setting, whether it is in front of the wall of stars at the cia or whether it's at a trump rally, and he tends to -- you know, he has the teleprompter and he switches back and forth. he has been urged by aides to stay on script. i suspect we will see what we often see with him. >> maggie haberman, thanks very much. appreciate it. >> thank you. if you're a 020 candidate, there is one place you want to be this july in iowa, first state in the nation to get a say in the primaries. that's where kamala harris has kicked off a three-day sprint
after rocketing up in the polls post debate. we have new national numbers for you, plus a special sit-down with voters in another key election state, next. too many people in pain settle for a restless night's sleep. there's a better choice. aleve pm. the only one to combine a safe sleep aid and the 12-hour pain-relieving strength of aleve. that dares to last into the morning. so you feel refreshed. aleve pm. there's a better choice. most people think a button is just a button. ♪ that a speaker is just a speaker. ♪ or - that the journey can't be the destination. most people haven't driven a lincoln. discover the lincoln approach to craftsmanship at the lincoln summer invitation. right now, get 0% apr on all 2019 lincoln vehicles plus no payments for up to 90 days. only at your lincoln dealer. plus no payments for up to 90 days. here are even more reasons to join t-mobile. one
do you like stranger things? sure you do. that's why netflix is on us. two unlimited data. use as much as you want, when you want. three no surprises on your bill. taxes and fees included. still think you have a better deal? bring in your discount, and we'll match it. that's right. t-mobile will match your discount. when crabe stronger...strong, with new nicorette coated ice mint. layered with flavor... it's the first and only coated nicotine lozenge. for an amazing taste... ...that outlasts your craving. new nicorette ice mint. thanks for the ride-along, captain! i've never been in one of these before,
even though geico has been- ohhh. ooh ohh here we go, here we go. you got cut off there, what were you saying? oooo. oh no no. maybe that geico has been proudly serving the military for over 75 years? is that what you wanted to say? mhmmm. i have to say, you seemed a lot chattier on tv. geico. proudly serving the military for over 75 years. you ok back there, buddy?
it puts boyden -- again, these are national numbers -- at 30% among registered voters with sanders in second and kamala harris in third at 13%. our cnn poll shows harris in second place, just five points behind biden. she's now in iowa for the next three days and will head to another early voting state, south carolina, this weekend. randi kaye made her way there to speak with a group of african-american voters in charleston to get their reactions to last week's debates, to harris' performance and whether race will play a role in who they vote for. >> show of hands, how many of you are considering voting for kamala harris? one, two, three, four, five. >> reporter: more than half of these voters in south carolina like what they see in kamala harris, more so after the democratic debate. >> she's very commanding. i think that that's important for little girls that look like her and look like me to see that on the big stage. >> reporter: michelle hilton wasn't even considering harris until the debate. >> i like the fact that she's an independent thinker and that
she's a strong woman and she's touching on those things that as a black woman i need to hear. >> what specific policies draw you to her? >> i like the fact that she wants to stand up for african-american rights. she wants to make sure that i get the same pay as a white woman, as a white man. >> reporter: harris is now on fay allen's radar, too. >> she's very strategic in what she says and how she does it. she has a lot of grit. and it takes that when you're a woman. >> reporter: voter john white, though, isn't all that impressed, even post debate. >> she is one-dimensional. she's a reactionary. she doesn't have any global or international policies that i've heard, no financial policies. >> reporter: harris' exchange with joe biden turned this voter off completely. >> at the debate, i definitely
decided that i am -- it's questionable whether she would be able to get my vote. >> was anyone here uncomfortable with how she handled joe biden on stage? >> i do believe her attack on him wasn't warranted by any means. she basically brought the fight to him. >> reporter: the issues most important to this group? education, the economy, and immigration. >> i like her policy about the immigration. i just think that that's another way kind of that trump is using to tear brown people down. >> reporter: one thing this group agrees on is that it's wrong to question kamala harris' race, as many are doing online since she's the daughter of a jamaican father and indian mother. >> i mean, is that really the thing that bothers people at night? >> how do you feel about the president's son retweeting a tweet about kamala harris' race and questioning it? >> it's a sign of the times.
we are so caught up in rumors, gossip, celebrities, things that are nothing but smoke that obscure the real issues. >> does this feel like echoes of birtherism to you? does it feel racist to you? >> it's the same thing that has been done to black people for years. you are being derated. you're not human. you're subhuman. you're not as good as us. are we going to continue to knock her because of her background? >> what matters is, was she born in america? yes. does she meet all of the other qualifications for president of the united states? yes. >> is race a factor for you in this, or do you just want someone who is electable and can beat donald trump? >> race is a thumbs up. it's a cherry on top. however, the cake itself, it has to have the qualifications. we have to be cognizant of what needs to be done and how it needs to be done. your race, your background, your color is just, again, the cherry on top. it's a plus. >> race is a complete nonissue for me.
i literally don't care. i would vote for any candidate who shows that they have solid policies that will actually impact people's lives. >> in 2020, could a black woman win the presidency? >> and that's what i've been going in my head. like, i really want it. i really would like to see it, but is it going to happen? i don't know. i don't think so. >> reporter: randi kaye, cnn, charleston, south carolina. >> it's an interesting discussion. we're going to pick it up on the other side with one of kamala harris' top surrogates from south carolina. we also have a biden supporter who argues he needs to sharpen up his responses on race. the question is, how, next. this is not a bed. it's a revolution in sleep. the sleep number 360 smart bed is on sale now during our lowest prices of the season. it senses your movement, and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. it even helps with this. so you wake up ready to hit the ground running.
don't miss our 4th of july special with the queen sleep number 360 c4 smart bed now $1299. plus, free premium delivery when you add a base. ends sunday. sleep number. proven, quality sleep. you ever wish you weren't a motaur? sure. sometimes i wish i had legs like you. yeah, like a regular person. no. still half bike/half man, just the opposite. oh, so the legs on the bottom and motorcycle on the top? yeah. yeah, i could see that. for those who were born to ride, there's progressive. you eat right... mostly. you make time... when you can. but sometimes life gets in the way, and that stubborn fat just won't go away. coolsculpting takes you further. a non-surgical treatment that targets, freezes, and eliminates treated fat cells, for good.
discuss coolsculpting with your doctor. some common side-effects include temporary numbness, discomfort, and swelling. don't imagine results, see them. coolsculpting, take yourself further. (v...especially when your easily distracted teenager has the car. the worst... at subaru, we're taking on distracted driving [ping] with sensors that alert you when your eyes are off the road.
vice president joe biden on the subject of race. i want to bring in two political commentators. so you heard the voters in randy's piece. were you surprised by the reaction to senator harris? >> well, no. joe biden has his whole career, he's really gotten a lot of support. he has so much good will in south carolina and other places in the black community over the decades of service that he's with this country and the vice president to barack obama which was an historic presidency. so i was not surprised that so many people were willing to say that you know, we'll take another look at her. but they felt like her attack on him was a bit much. we've seen it from the older voters as well which are a more reliable voting demographic that still support joe biden. they know that his record of
civil rights support speaks for itself. i'm encouraged to see even though some in the polls, her performance was note worthy. does she have lasting power? does the issue of busing matter to the voters in states like the midwest that the democrats need on win back to win overall? the initial reaction was, she really got him. but then her record will come under more scrutiny as well. >> and also, the poes were saying, they're national polls. what matters is iowa and new hampshire and south carolina initially. the fact two of the voters in randsy's piece took issue with the way that harris confronted in the debate, i'm wondering what you make of that. there's still a lot of support. >> and nevada matters as well. i want to say that yeah. those vote hers some issues with the way that it was prepared.
not only prepared but executed. she got into a confrontation with senator biden. what i say to that is, it's very simple. i was in a spin room when donald trump wrote out five alleged accusers of bill clinton prior to the debate with hillary clinton miflt retort would be, if you have a problem, imagine when joe biden has to stand toe to toe with donald trump. what i got from that focus group, all of those voters believed that senator harris is a fighter. and i think that all of those voters realized, those who got a chance to see her. you saw the overwhelming majority say they will consider her so that is a plus for the senator. >> according to the latest cnn polling, bbd has a healthy lead among black voters. 36%. as you said, the vice president cannot simply rely on that
support. he has to work hard for those votes. >> absolutely. >> do you think he gets that? >> i would think watching his support drop by double digits from that debate to now should be a wake-up call. that he cannot have a performance like he did last week in the cnn debate coming up. because people, momentum matters. we live in a visual age. when people see you and they think that you're bloodied, they'll go with the candidates that has moment-up. he needs to take a stage and repeat it. hillary was win go overwhelmingly too and then barack obama won iowa. he needs to explain why he can take to it donald trump. since when have people questioned that joe biden is a fighter or not?
he's always been known as that. the fact pits being questioned. >> how much of this comes from name recognition at this point? >> i've always said it. the support for joe biden is very, very wide but it doesn't have much depth. that's why 36% supporting the african-american community right now. it is steadily eroding and going down. kamala harris is at 25%. if we look at 2016, h h had 68% support. she still had overwhelming support from the african-american community. so he is in trouble with that block of voters. to go back to 2008, briefly, i was the chair for barack obama in 2008 in south carolina. he was in the exact same position. and african-american voters came to him late. the more they learned about kamala harris. stay with us for this two-hour
edition of "ac360" and the flip-flop on the census. hopes you drive safely.insuy but allstate actually helps you drive safely... with drivewise. it lets you know when you go too fast... ...and brake too hard. with feedback to help you drive safer. giving you the power to actually lower your cost. unfortunately, it can't do anything about that. now that you know the truth... are you in good hands?