jim sciutto. breaking news this friday morning. i'm jim sciutto in washington. she had the plan, but now she's telling us how she will pay for it. presidential candidate elizabeth warren unveiling the $20 trillion proposal just moments ago and she is still pledging there will be no middle class tax hike necessary to fund it. cnn political correspondent mj lee has more on this. mj, explain the details here. $20 trillion. how does warren plan realistically to pay for that without a middle class tax increase? >> yeah, jim, this is an issue that she has been being asked about for weeks now and has been criticized a lot for not having an answer to how she plans to pay for medicare for all. and now she has put out a plan detailing how she planned to do that.

and the big question that she has been asked since she hasn't been able to answer is will middle class tax goes up under medicare for all? today she is saying no. she writes, we don't need to raise taxes on the middle class by one penny to finance medicare for all. now politically speaking, this is a very interesting split screen because, of course, medicare for all is written by bernie sanders and sanders himself said this week he doesn't believe it's yet necessary to put out a full detained plan explaining how to pay for it. and warren saying it's important to fight any misinformation out there by putting out this detailed plan. let's talk about the numbers. the price tag is $20.5 trillion of new federal spending over ten years. she is saying that this will be paid for in a number of different ways as you see on the screen there, including employers continuing to make their contributions. that accounts for at least around half of the total. and then there are things like cracking down on tax evasion and fraud and targeting the

financial sector and large corporations with more taxes. and then beefing up the wealth tax. this is her signature plan on taxing the wealth of some of the we wealthiest americans. she's already put out that plan and now saying i amend that and i'll have the billionaires pay a little more than what i initially imagined. there are a lot of numbers here that analysts and experts are going to chew over and her critics will certainly say this is still not realistic. you can't really get to that number, but again, politically speaking, it's significant that she has finally put out a plan trying to answer questions about how she plans on paying for all of this. and just one quick financial note and an important note at that, she says that she's going to put out yet another plan in the coming weeks on how she wants to transition to medicare for all. this is significant because bernie sanders imagines the transition period being four years. so if she's going to put out a plan of her own on transitioning to medicare for all, perhaps she

could envision a scenario where that transition is longer than what bernie sanders envisioned. so we just don't have the answer to that. >> $20 trillion. that's a thousand billion for each of those trillions. mj lee, thank you. christine romans and senior political analyst ron brownstein joining me now along with mj. christine, first, help me with the math here. what sticks out to me is more than half of this $20.5 trillion figure is going to be covered by corporations it looks like if you put the numbers back on the screen. $8.8 trillion from employers. 5.8 from financial companies and big corporations, large corporations. first of all, they're not going to like that. >> no, they're not. >> when you look at these numbers, is this realistic? does this math add up? >> this is why she's not popular along the c suite elites. they look at her trying to remake capitalism and health care and they are the ones who are going to have to pay for it. you look at cracking down on tax

evasion and fraud. she's clearly points out this is going to be focused on wealthy americans. she talks about her wealth tax which is 3 cents on every dollar of net worth above a billion. she already had that. she's going to add another 3 cents for people who have net worth above a billion. also the investor class. she wants to change the long-term capital gains and have those taxed annually, not just a point of sale and have that rate to be much higher than the current 20% for long-term capital gain and 37% for the richest americans who do that. so this is clearly a populist positioning. do the numbers work out? you'll have everybody crunching those numbers all day today. certainly the $20.5 trillion is less than some of the other plans we've seen but she puts the burden on the backs of investors and companies here. >> a trillion here. trillion there. eventually talking about real money. ron brownstein, we should note the big picture here as well that medicare for all, which was

an idea that was from the fringes of the far left. now you have two of the leading candidates, this as a central part of their platform. and if we can show the numbers from the latest iowa polling which just came out today, iowa one of the early voting states, look where warren and sanders are. it shows that these kinds of proposals have appeal among democratic voters. >> yeah, there's a piece of the democratic audience that liked this. a couple other realities here. first, jim, this is a very plausible thing to raise $20.5 trillion. $24.5 trillion is at the very low end of estimates of what medicare for all will cost. the urban institute just estimated it will cost $32 trillion over ten years. and you know, she will -- maybe the transition plan helps keep down the cost but a lot of the way she keeps down the cost, deep in the plan, she severely cuts rates reimbursement rates for providers, including hospitals down to about what medicare now pays which is a lot

less than private insurance and a lot of questions about even with some adjustments she talks about, whether hospitals can survive at that level of reimbursement. if you raise the level of reimbursement you raise the cost and the tax that you have to then summon. by the way, even $20.5 trillion is nearly as much as the personal income tax, the total personal income tax is projected to raise over the next decade. and on the politics it's worth noting that support for this idea is -- does exist in the democratic caucus, but it's stalled out at about half of house democrats. only about half of house democrats are supporting the legislation to do this. and i was in a group of columnists that interviewed nancy pelosi earlier this week. and she said maybe medicare for all is a destination but it's not a place to start. so the prospects of this, even with a democratic president, would remain very, you know, uncertain. >> listen, a little more than a year ago, less than a year, the whole government was shut down over the issue of obamacare which was a smaller issue.

the government shut down a number of years ago but then another attempt failed narrowly in the republican-led congress. mj lee, this establishes a clear difference between elizabeth warren and bernie sanders here in terms of how this will be paid for without taxing middle class at all. is that a deliberate move by elizabeth warren to distinguish herself there? >> absolutely. this kind of collision course is really politically fascinating. the fact that medicare for all is entirely bernie sanders' idea and a whole bunch of progressives have gotten behind that idea but now warren is almost sort of saying what you have put out and the details that you've put out clearly isn't enough. she's very aware of the fact that the last debate, the cnn/"new york times" debate, she got a ton of criticism from her rivals. she has been getting asked this question by reporters on the road, by some voters as well. i think we've reached a point where we saw the position that she was taking to be politically

untenable. for her to get asked over and over, how are you going to pay for this. will middle class tax goes up? and for her to not have a clear answer when, i think her brand has so much become the candidate that has a plan for everything. i think she quickly realized or actually, i shouldn't even say quickly. it's taken her a long time to realize that that positioning was not tenable. and i think the fact that now she has a plan for paying for bernie sanders' medicare for all while at the same time sanders is saying i don't think it's necessary to put out those full details yet is really fascinating. >> mj lee, ron brownstein, thanks very much. christine, if i could ask you to stay. this, of course, the other breaking news. 128,000 jobs added in october. this is higher than anticipated, particularly in a month where you had a major strike going on. of course, the gm strike now resolved. how did those numbers manage to stay up despite losing tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs to the strike? >> yeah, you can see that gm

strike, that six-week gm strike but the overall numbers were stronger than expected and showed still steady hiring. what the president is tweeting about this morning is that you had upward revisions for august and september. september was stronger as well. so the end of the summer was stronger than anticipated. manufacturing was a weak spot because of that gm strike. manufacturing has been faltering in recent weeks. in less than an hour we'll get a really important manufacturing number here. food services, though, strong hiring in restaurants and bars and in business. health care had another 15,000. the segue from health care, 400,000-some health care jobs added over the last year. this is an important part of the economy to get right whoever is trying to tinker with health care, and manufacturing losing 36,000. that's 100% of the gm strike. the unemployment rate, 3.6%. that's up just 0.1%. i'm not worried about that movement. and the reason why is because

325,000 people came into the labor market. that means ten years into a jobs recovery they are starting to believe it. and they're starting to go out there and look for jobs. so now they're being added into the labor market. that's why you saw that number go up. still, the earning pace of hiring, it's not as robust as it's been the past few years but still holding in there, jim. >> it is. and another number coming out in less than an hour on manufacturing. we'll be watching that. christine romans, thanks very much. as the house prepares for the next phase of the impeachment inquiry, we'll soon see public hearings, you and i are going to be able to watch these as well as full witness transcripts released. next, a new poll shows the high stakes and the real split evident here for democrats. plus, a fast-moving fire breaking out overnight forcing thousands from their homes in california. this happening across the state. fire crews nearly trapped in the flames in this one. we'll be live there. and racial slurs, threats, bullying. think that will get you kicked off facebook?

think again. the stunning findings of cnn's six-month-long investigation. it's worth watching. that's coming up. be wild...♪ 25 cent boneless wings at applebee's. get 'em while they're hot.

t-mobile's newest most powerful signal is here. experience it with the amazing, new iphone 11. and right now, t-mobile has the best deal on iphone. get 4 lines of unlimited with 4 iphone 11 included for only $35 a line. all on a signal that goes farther than ever before. that's right. get 4 unlimited lines and 4 iphone 11 for $35 a line. only at t-mobile. here's the thing about managing for your business.s when you've got public clouds, and private clouds, and hybrid clouds-

things can get a bit cloudy for you. but now, there's the dell technologies cloud, powered by vmware. a single hub for a consistent operating experience across all your clouds. that should clear things up. so you have ten years experience... i do. but no phd? i do have a masters in early childhood development. you don't mind if i record this, do you? uhh, no! first kid. here's all the numbers, food's in the fridge, oh and lucas likes to pull on jewelry so you might want to lose the nose ring. by their second kid, parents are more likely to choose luvs. it absorbs 20x its weight and the triple leakguards lock away wetness for outstanding leakage protection. live, learn, and get luvs. some farms grow food. this one grows fuel. ♪ exxonmobil is growing algae for biofuels.

that could one day power planes, propel ships, and fuel trucks... and cut their greenhouse gas emissions in half. algae. its potential just keeps growing. ♪

strongve is one of a kind keeps growing. brilliant unbreakable ♪ engagement rings now 20- 40 percent off shop unique bridal styles at zales, the diamond store the house is moving forward to a public phase of the impeachment inquiry. adam schiff says the first transcripts of witness testimony compiled so far could be released next week. then, after several more closed door interviews, including what could be testimony from former national security adviser john

bolton, that will be key. house speaker nancy pelosi says the first public hearings will begin. you and i can watch these. this is all happening as a new abc news/"washington post" poll shows the country split right down the middle over whether the president should be impeached and removed from office. cnn's senior congressional correspondent manu raju is live on capitol hill. as we look at events today and in the coming days, certainly a partisan split here up on the hill, but we are entering a second phase with high stakes for both sides. >> yeah, no question about it, jim. but next week we'll be an interesting one because it's a busy one scheduled for -- it was a number of key witnesses behind closed doors. and there's a significant chance that none of these witnesses actually show because the people they have asked to come interview are, say, high up within the food chain of the white house and the state department, former officials, people who have yet to commit to come. that includes on monday a busy day with four people behind

closed doors, including john eisenberg, someone who heard those complaints about the president's phone call with ukrainian president zelensky and a top deputy for mick mulvaney, robert blair and former chief of staff for the manager independent, brian mccormack. amid questions about the role the energy secretary rick perry played in all of this. yet to get commitments for those ideas. and then later in the week top officials from the office of management and budget, when the office of management and budget indicated they have no interest in complying with the democratic request. and the big one later in the week in john bolton. someone who is said to have been very concerned about the efforts to push for -- to withhold ukrainian aid to push for these investigations into the president's rival. someone who has been mentioned throughout these closed door depositions, but he has yet to commit to coming through an attorney and said he would only come if he were yet to get a subpoena. he'd definitely come if he got a

subpoena. if the democrats don't get any cooperation next week, adam schiff is warning this could ultimately all get rolled into more evidence in the democrats' view of obstruction of congress before they move into that public phase which could happen the week after. so we are heading into a new phase, jim, but potentially next week we can see a lot of stonewalling from the white house. and democrats pushing back. >> true. >> although it's been notable that many of those officials and current ones have ignored the white house stonewalling and gone ahead and spoken. for more on how the white house is reacting to all of this, let's speak to senior washington correspondent joe johns. he is outside the white house this morning. joe, we saw house republicans stuck together yesterday under enormous pressure from the president and the white house here. does the white house believe its strategy is working? >> well, it's clear that the white house is happy with what happened over on the house side. the senate is the big deal for the president of the united states because if the president is impeached, the senate is

going to hold a trial and it's important for him to keep all the republicans together over there. and a question, of course, is how is he going to do that? one way to do that is certainly to reach out to the public and try to shore up your support there. the president suggesting in an interview with the "washington examiner" an 80-minute interview, that he might actually hold a fireside chat and read the partial transcript of that telephone call he had with the profit ukraine on july 25th, which is the basis for a lot of the stuff going on in the impeachment inquiry. and so the question is, why would he do that? it's pretty clear the president is very skillful at creating a few different catch phrases which he uses to impart his message on a particular issue. the president has said again and again the call was perfect. no problem with the call. and, of course, as you know, jim, if you do that in a situation like that and you have

the megaphone, the president of the united states, your supporters are going to listen. so the president is hoping people won't talk about the questions of self-dealing and $400 million being held up from ukraine. >> right. speaking of self-dealing, and perhaps intentionally, the president snuck into the news cycle yesterday. a confirmation that he's moving his permanent residence from new york to florida. of course, notable, florida has no state taxes. was this about taxes? >> well, good question. what he did was he -- in september, he filled out a declaration of domicile stating that palm beach florida, which is where his mar-a-lago club is, would be the place where he intends to stay. his home in other words. and we do know that the taxes are very high in new york and new york city and all told for this president something like 16%. if he moves to florida, at least as domicile, certainly it will

be reduced. but also important to point out that the president has taken a lot of heat in new york city recently. cyrus vance, the manhattan da going after his tax returns. and he's not widely liked in new york city either. so he is closely associated with new york nonetheless, moving to florida he says. >> so closely associated that he's lived there for decades. joe johns, thank you. joining me to discuss this, jackie, author of "the washington post" power up and cnn national security and legal analyst susan hennessy, a former nsa attorney. the gop played up the fact that yesterday's vote, at least on the procedures of an impeachment inquiry was very much party line. two democrats leaving their party to join with republicans in voting against. do republicans have a point here when they say this shows this is a partisan impeachment inquiry? >> no, they don't because what we haven't seen here yet is the public aspect of this hearing

which is what the resolution accomplished yesterday. if anything, the fact that they're seizing on that argument shows how little strategy there is for the gop going ahead because what democrats did yesterday did really strengthen their hand politically. the gop had been clamoring for weeks to hold a vote in order to make this an official nonsecretive inquiry. and nancy pelosi did just that. and what yesterday's vote also showed is that democrats actually believe that they have a substantive case here. that they have enough to make this -- to make a public argument as to why the president should be impeached. >> fair point. i get it. and, of course, things could change when you have the public testimony. when you see, for instance, an alexander vindman in his army officer uniform testifying as to what he witnessed firsthand on this and you can see that changing public opinion, but we had a sample, susan hennessy, of what faces republicans who step out of line. francis rooney on this broadcast a couple of weeks ago told poppy

harlow, his mind was open to impeachment. have a listen. >> it's clear to me you're saying at this point you are not ruling out the possibility that this is an impeachable offense for the president. >> i don't think you can rule anything out until you know all the facts. >> okay. >> every time one of these people testifies, we get more information about what was going on over there. >> in the immediate hours after that, he was haranged by people in his district, elsewhere and within 24 hours, he announced he is retiring. that gives you an example of when you stick your neck out as a republican or even in the face of a public inquiry. >> it's one reason we saw so much pressure being brought to bear on republicans in the house to ensure this was a pure party line vote. that they really couldn't afford even one or two people crossing the aisle and having them forfeit this talking point. that this is a purely partisan endeavor. and that's because the republicans lost their other major talking point yesterday which is they've spent the past five or six weeks clamoring

about a procedural unfairness. >> they are still complaining they don't have -- you and i have talked about the history here. it's not entirely true but they're still complaining they don't have all the leeway they'd like. >> that said, the bare fact is they've still said the past couple of weeks claiming they wanted more process and procedures, claiming a wanted a vote and then voted against that. have been claiming they wanted open hear,s, that the closed proceedings are unfaur and now abruptly make this shift to oppose open hearings. that's a difficult position for republicans to maintain. >> new abc news/"washington post" poll shows the country split right down the middle. and we should note this is on impeachment and removal which is different from just impeachment. in there, the number that stood out was independents evenly split and with a slightly, and granted that's within the margin of error, against impeachment and removal. how troubling should that be for

democrats as we head into the 2020 cycle. >> while this feels like it's been going on for years already, we're really at the beginning. y the public part of this hearing is going to be important. what nancy pelosi and house democrats really showed yesterday is that it's all but inevitable this is going to be a public trial. it's going to make it to the senate. we'll see this on television. six days a week. up through potentially the new hampshire primary. and when you have people like alexander vindman, a very decorated iraq war, sober minded veteran, publicly, you know, agree to publicly testify before congress and before the public, you know, that doesn't bode well for this president, especially when all the arguments they've made so far have been on a procedural, tactical standpoint and not on substance. >> here's a new argument you're starting to hear. "the wall street journal" had this in their editorial yesterday. put the quote up on the screen. i'll paraphrase for time. democrats want to impeach mr. trump for asking a foreign

government to investigate his political rival for corruption though the probe never happened and for withholding aid to ukraine that in the end wasn't withheld. we're seeing a trial balloon on an argument that, okay, this was bad. it was an attempted abuse of power, but it didn't happen. therefore, it's not impeachable. does that argument stand up? >> it doesn't stand up. of course, attempting a crime is itself a crime. one reason we're seeing republicans resort to this is because it was successful and after the mueller report came out. it showed the president very clearly attempted to obstruct justice but mueller said, look, he was thwarted a lot of the times. he tried to do this but people didn't follow his -- >> also willing to accept foreign help for the investigation in the trump tower meeting. that was their defense there. they're going to try it whether you think oos substantive. >> it's not a particularly strong argument. the fact this is sort of the best they can come up with is an indication the substantive defense here just isn't there if the only thing you can say to defend someone's conduct is, well, it didn't work. he didn't get away with it.

and that's your defense to abuse of office. that doesn't sound like a winning strategy. >> susan, jackie, great to have you on. hope you have a good weekend. house republicans stand united on impeachment while two democrats did stray away from party lines. we'll ask one house democrat what that means for the future of this impeachment inquiry. that's coming up. pampers is here to help every parent love the changes a baby brings. [baby cries] pampers is the first and only diaper with air dry channels. they stay up to 3 times drier, so babies can sleep soundly...all night. pampers.

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

and i wanted to ask you... before i ask her. may i have your permission to marry her? you're marrying her and her whole world. shop neal lane diamond engagement rings. at kay. shop neal lane diamond engagement rings. but we're also a company that controls hiv, fights cancer, repairs shattered bones,

relieves depression, restores heart rhythms, helps you back from strokes, and keeps you healthy your whole life. from the day you're born we never stop taking care of you.

right now house democrats are pressing forward planning for the next phase. the public phase of their impeachment inquiry into the president. house speaker nancy pelosi has not given an exact timeline about when those hearings will go public. but last night she did tell stephen colbert she expects them to happen soon. i'm pleased to be joined by florida democratic congresswoman debbie wasserman-schultz. she serves on one of the committees investigating the president and hearing witnesses the last couple of weeks. we appreciate you taking the time this morning. >> my pleasure, jim. thank you. >> so you're well aware of the vote yesterday. republicans voted in lock step against these rules here. two democrats voted with republicans against them. i'm wondering, are you concerned that republicans were able to stick together here but democrats were not? >> what i'm concerned about is that republicans seem to be shrugging their shoulders at the president's gross violation of his oath of office and his massive abuse of power.

every american should be asking their own member of congress whether they think it's okay that the president broke the law, used his position of power to pressure the president of ukraine to -- by withholding foreign aid and trying to insist that he initiate investigations against the president's political opponents. that is unacceptable and not okay, and the republicans have sanctioned it. >> i get that argument, but the fact is, for this impeachment inquiry to proceed to the possibility of removal in the senate, you, democrats, have to convince some republicans, several republicans that that's true. and i thought there was a telling sign in this new abc news/"washington post" poll just out today that shows independents crucially split down the middle and if you put the numbers up on the screen, leaning against impeaching and removing the president. those are the independent numbers down there. 49% say no there. is that a sign that you're not

convincing folks outside the democratic party in sufficient numbers to support impeachment and removal? >> we're going through a process, jim. and we will, as we've approved -- as we approve the rules for the road of the impeachment inquiry yesterday, we'll move into the public phase of the inquiry. i think as the transcripts are released and the american people hear the evidence that i've been able to hear over the last number of weeks and a spotlight is shown on the witnesses that come before us and corroborate each of their own testimony that the president abused his power and pressured the president of a country that vitally needs our assistance to keep our foreign enemy, russia, at bay and withheld foreign aid and demanded investigations, pressured him to initiate investigations against his opponent in the public light that will, i think those numbers will change and the polling right now shows that more than 50% of the american people do

believe that the president should be impeached and removed. so that will play out. but no one comes to congress to impeach a president. i'm focused on lowering prescription drug costs, ending gun violence but we have to hold the president accountable because no one is above the law. >> you were in the room when tim morrison, the president's top adviser on russia and europe testified under oath. of course, we were not in the room. we have the benefit of having seen parts of his opening statement where he does say that what he heard on that call, he was worried about the political implications of it. it coming out. how that might affect the relationship. but he said not illegal in his view. can you tell us anything about how, you know, how he detailed that position and do you believe that his further testimony backed up that statement? >> you know, i can only generally talk about the deposition that we heard yesterday from mr. morrison. and that is to say that he most definitely corroborated, particularly ambassador taylor's

testimony and really virtually every witness that i have heard testimony that the president did, indeed, use the authority of his office to pressure the president of ukraine to initiate investigations against his opponent and the leverage that he used was withholding foreign aid and a vital meeting that president zelensky needed to be able to advance his efforts to keep russia at bay and reduce corruption. >> you are saying his private testimony corroborated the quid pro quo that there was a quid pro quo here? >> what i'm saying is that throughout the testimony, each witness has subsequently confirmed the direct line that the president's own words in the transcript of the call confirmed that he used the power of his office to try to get the -- as in his own words, zelensky to do us a favor, though, and initiate

these investigations. and he withheld foreign aid. and dangled the meeting that president zelensky vitally needed to be able to make sure we can keep our enemy at bay. >> i want to ask you about another -- you're well aware of the fiery exchange you had in a hearing earlier this week -- >> yes, i certainly am. >> i want to play that exchange just for folks at home who may not have seen it and then also get your reaction to ken cuccinel cuccinelli's response to it. then we'll come back. >> you and mr. trump don't want anyone who looks or talks differently than caucasian americans to be allowed into this country. >> that's false. >> i'm sorry. please don't interrupt me and i'd like the time back. >> that's defamatory. >> there's nothing defamatory. >> the gentle lady controls the time. you want to block all immigration and make life harder for immigrants and you'll pursue this heinous white supremacist ideology at all costs, even if it means making critically ill

children your collateral damage in the process. >> i am not a white supremacist as you alluded. >> you have had -- >> nor is the president. >> i'm under oath and she is literally protected to lie by what's called the speech and debate clause of the constitution. i'm not even sure she's aware of it, but it allows legislators, for good policy reasons, to be able to say anything. it's to leave them uninhibited. i don't think the founders ever intended for it to be a shield for lying and planting narratives out in the public. and that was what she was doing. she makes her speech. she wasn't at much of the committee hearing. she came in late on her smears, both me and the president. all completely false. and then wasn't there much longer. got on her broom and left. it was just a fly-by for her, and to get her little sound bite. >> do you stand by your

accusation of cuccinelli that the policy, the immigration policy led by him and the president is white supremacist in nature? >> what i stand by is that ken cuccinelli is the tip of the spear of the president's immigration policy that has persecuted and gone after people of color since day one of his presidency and that, yes, i used my ability as a member of the oversight committee to call that out and to insist, rightfully so, that ken cuccinelli has advanced a white supremacist ideology that i think is a thread through the president's immigration policy. h started his presidency by initiating a muslim ban that was repeatedly thrown out by the courts. the subject of the hearing itself was the separation, the persecution of sick children who have been allowed into the country that he sent a letter to and they had to -- they were

demanded to leave initially in 33 days until our oversight committee stopped that from happening by shining a spotlight on it. he advanced a policy of separating children from their parents at the border who were fleeing persecution. we've now required through this policy political applicants for asylum to stay in another country, living in tent cities and in horrible conditions? yes, ken cuccinelli is the tip of the spear of a white supremacist ideology that is the thread of the president's immigration policy targeting people of color. and i'm a member of congress on the oversight committee, and i had an opportunity to call it out, and i did, and i don't regret it. >> congresswoman -- >> patronizing comments about me but that's not surprising either. >> understood. thanks for explaining your position. debbie wasserman schultz, hope you have a good weekend. >> thank you so much. several hundred firefighters in southern california trying to battle a new wildfire that is

out of control and still growing fast. (dramatic orchestra) ♪ performance comes in lots of flavors. there's the amped-up, over-tuned, feeding-frenzy-of sheet-metal-kind. and then there's performance that just leaves you feeling better as a result. that's the kind lincoln's about. ♪ (thud) (crash) (grunting) (whistle) play it cool and escape heartburn fast with tums chewy bites

cooling sensation. ♪ tum tu-tu-tum tums o♪ ozempic®! ♪ oh! oh! cooling sensation. (announcer) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than 7 and maintained it. oh! under 7? (announcer) and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study, adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? (announcer) a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. oh! no increased risk? (announcer) ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing.

serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase the risk for low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i discovered the potential with ozempic®. ♪ oh! oh! oh! ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) if eligible, you may pay as little as $25 per prescription. ask your health care provider today about once-weekly ozempic®.

california is on fire. another wildfire breaking out overnight in southern california spreading rapidly, nearly

trapping fire crews on the ground. >> the second one in here. that fire is a little closer. he's going to make a run for it and get down here as quick as possible to get away from that fire and continue down here to the east. now he's right up on top of the hill. you see a big flare up right there. >> firefighters there putting their lives in danger to fight this. our correspondent omar jimenez is in santa paula near that fire. it's already scorched some 8,000 acres. what are you seeing on the ground and are these firefighters able to establish some control over these blazes? >> look, they've been doing their best over the course of really this week as all these fires have been popping up across southern california. now when you talk about the maria fire, this one broke out halloween night. people were literally out trick-or-treating in this part of santa paula when they had to cut that short because they saw what was on the horizon.

we're right on the edge of the fire. this has already burned some 8,000 acres. 7,500 residents as part of this mandatory evacuation order. and, look, this has been a familiar story across this week. you and i have spoken pretty much every single morning. you look at what our crew has done just alone, we started in los angeles at the getty fire. then went over here to ventura county for the easy fire. that was the onegan presidentia library. then yesterday in san bernardino for the hillside fire. and now here we are, a new day, a new fire and this is part of one of the more than 11 active wildfires currently burning across the state. and half of those starting just this week alone and the common denominator in all of them are those high winds that we've been talking about over the course of this week. the good news is that crews are looking to the reprieve and wind speeds we'll see today as opposed to the peaks we've seen

in the past 24 hours to try to make some progress in these blazes. >> of course, this is a bigger picture question here as to what's calling the increase in the frequency. omar jimenez, thank you. facebook says they do not tolerate online bullying and harassment. but a cnn investigation found the opposite. the full report ahead. the new $3 little john from jimmy john's is just like our original sandwiches...only littler...so we bought a little ad...on lil jon. little johns, yeah! $3, what?!

to find out, olay faced the world.better than olay? we tested our vitamin b3 formula and beat japan's top moisturizers. south korea's most innovative. and even the $400 french cream. olay regenerist faced 131 premium products in 12 countries, over 10 years. olay's hydration was unbeaten every time. olay. face anything. hi, my name is sam davis and i'm going to tell you about exciting plans available to anyone with medicare. many plans provide broad coverage and still may save you money on monthly premiums and prescription drugs. with original medicare, you're covered for hospital stays and doctor office visits, but you have to meet a deductible for each and then you're still

responsible for 20% of the cost. next, let's look at a medicare supplement plan. as you can see, they cover the same things as original medicare and they also cover your medicare deductibles and co-insurance. but they often have higher monthly premiums and no prescription drug coverage. now, let's take a look at humana's medicare advantage plans. with a humana medicare plan, hospital stays, doctor office visits and medicare deductibles are covered. and, of course, most humana medicare advantage plans include prescription drug coverage. in fact, in 2018, humana medicare advantage prescription drug plan members saved an estimated $7400, on average, on their prescription costs. most humana medicare advantage plans help you stay active and keep fit by including a silver sneakers fitness program at no extra cost. and, you may be able to

save on dental and vision expenses, because coverage is now included with most humana medicare advantage plans. you get all this coverage for as low as a zero dollar monthly plan premium in many areas. and your doctor and hospital may already be a part of humana's large network. if you want the facts, call right now for the free decision guide from humana. there is no obligation, so call the number on your screen right now to see if your doctor is in our network; to find out if you can save on your prescriptions and to get our free decision guide. licensed humana sales agents are standing by, so call now.

enormous criticism in recent weeks and months. right now battling critics over the policy on political ads. not fact checking and allowing them to lie in effect. another policy under fire. a six-month cnn investigation raises concern the social media is also too soft on online bullying and harassment. senior medical correspondent elizabeth cohen has been working on this. elizabeth this is a sensitive issue particularly as a parent. you see in go on. it's enormously painful. what has facebook not been doing here. >> jim, this really is to disturbing. facebook says that they don't tolerate bullying. they say in very strongly. but what we found is that actually bullying is alive and well and facebook often does nothing or little about it. to give you an example this is disturbing i want to introduce to you a woman, a mother of three in austin texas.

her brother has immune problems and she goes on facebook encouraging others to get vaccinated to protect people like her brother and this is what she got when she opened facebook messenger the privat direct messenger service she got this horrible message calling her the n-word. telling her to kill herself, her children and her parents and giving her graphic instructions. -- that's what we covered up in black at the bottom on how to slit her wrists. she reported this. facebook found this was not the first time that this sender had done something terrible like this. she was a repeat offender. and even so here is what they did, jim. they told her she couldn't send messages for in re: the days. she could receive them. make comments. make posts. she couldn't return -- she couldn't send out these facebook messages. that's it. and some people say, wow, that's too soft. they did kick her off once we brought it to their attention

and said are you sure this is all you're going to do? we asked facebook for the response to this. and here is what they sent us. they said we want members of our community to feel safe and respected on facebook and remove material that appears to purposefully target individuals with the intention of degrading or shaming them. we try to empower our ut li users with controls such as blocking other users and moderating comments to limit exposure to unwanted offensive or hurtful content. we encourage people to report bullying behavior and our platform so we can review the content and take proper action. that's according to a facebook spokesperson. jim. >> sounds a bit like they're putting the on us on users. >> yes. >> as opposed to the platform elizabeth cohen great investigation thanks very much. >> thanks. >> house democrats work to bring the impeachment inquire into the public spotlight so we can see the witnesses testify. president trump working behind the scenes to shore up republican support. in the senate the senate will decide if he stays in office.

pampers is here to help every parent love the changes a baby brings. [baby cries] pampers is the first and only diaper with air dry channels. they stay up to 3 times drier, so babies can sleep soundly...all night. pampers. a lot will happen in your life. wrinkles just won't. neutrogena® rapid wrinkle repair's derm-proven retinol works so fast, it takes only one week to reveal younger looking skin.

making wrinkles look so last week. rapid wrinkle repair® pair with retinol oil for 2x the wrinkle fighting power. neutrogena® ♪after being a partd you wrof millions of love stories... will you marry me yes ...at kay, we've learned the most important love story will always be... your own. every yes. omg, yes begins with kay. get zero down special financing with kay jewelers long live love credit card. this is a jimmy john's sandwich, made with all-natural meats, hand-sliced veggies, and fresh-baked bread. and this is the new little john, available for only $3. they're almost identical. almost. ♪ good job. okay.

plaque psoriasis uncoverth clearer skin that can last. in fact, tremfya® was proven superior to humira® in providing significantly clearer skin. tremfya® may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms or if you had a vaccine or plan to. serious allergic reactions may occur. tremfya®. uncover clearer skin that can last. janssen can help you explore cost support options.

thbecause with nband after thleague pass on xfinityr. you can watch the out of market games you want- all season long. and with the all-new xfinity sports zone, you get everything nba all in one place- even notifications about your favorite teams. watch the dropped dimes, monster blocks, and showstopping dunks. plus get instant access to your teams with the power of your voice. that's simple, easy, awesome. say nba league pass into your voice remote to upgrade for a great low price - or go online today.

annoepidemic fueled by juul use with their kid-friendly flavors. san francisco voters stopped the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. but then juul, backed by big tobacco, wrote prop c to weaken e-cigarette protections. the san francisco chronicle reports prop c is an audacious overreach, threatening to overturn the ban on flavored products approved by voters. prop c means more kids vaping. that's a dangerous idea. vote no on juul. no on big tobacco. no on prop c. i'm jim sciutto in washington. after months of facing hard questions about how she would pay for medicare for all plan. presidential candidate elizabeth warren is revealing her answer. the 2020 hopeful unveiling t