interview with democratic presidential nominee joe biden. that's tomorrow on "the lead" with jake tapper at 4:00 p.m. eastern. i'm pamela brown in for jake tapper. and our coverage on cnn continues right now. this is cnn breaking news. >> welcome to our viewers here in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer in "the situation room." we're following breaking news. explosive new details from veteran journalist bob woodward's brand new book including an admission by president trump on tape that he fully understood the severity of the coronavirus crisis in early february and that he then deliberately downplayed the pandemic to the american public. the bombshell revelations come as the united states now surpasses yet another terrible milestone, more than 190,000 americans have died from coronavirus. and it raises the sobering

question, how many of those lives could've been saved if the president of the united states had confronted this crisis honestly with the american public and aggressively from the very, very beginning? bob woodward's book also reveals a new account of the president's disparaging language toward the united states military leadership. and in just a moment we'll also bring you additional details from the book about the very bizarre and affectionate letters between north korea's kim jong-un and president trump. but let's begin with cnn's jamie gangel who has been doing amazing reporting on all this. you've done a lot of digging on the woodward book. so what did the president precisely know about the severity of the virus and when did he know it? >> it turns out, wolf, that he knew critical details very early on. in addition to obtaining a copy of woodward's new book, we have at cnn obtained audiotapes of these interviews.

woodward did 18 wide-ranging interviews with the president. and what we're going to start with is some audio from their interview on february 7th in which the president reveals that he knew just how dangerous, deadly, airborne and that this was much worse than a normal flu. here is the audio. >> and so what was president xi saying yesterday? >> we were talking mostly about the virus. and i think he's going to have it in good shape, but it's a very tricky situation. it goes through air, bob. that's always tougher than the touch. you know, the touch you don't have to touch things. but the air you just breathe the air and that's how it's passed. so that's a very tricky one. that's a very delicate one.

it's also more deadly than even your strenuous flus. people don't realize we lose 25,000, 30,000 people a year here. who would ever think that, right? >> i know. >> that's pretty amazing. >> for -- >> this is more deadly. this is 5% verse 1% and less than 1%. this is deadly stuff. >> it's just striking, wolf. because if you go back and think about early february, we were not aware of any of this. we were just thinking about all the people in china. we just didn't have any idea. and woodward writes that this was a betrayal of trust and a failure of leadership. as you said, you have to wonder how many lives could've been saved it instead of just telling

woodward he had been forthcoming with the american public. >> he would have been blunt and told the american public the severity of what was going on presumably thousands of lives potentially could've been saved. the president's acknowledgment, jamie, of the seriousness of the virus in that conversation in early february with woodward stands in totally stark contrast with what he was repeatedly telling the american people at that time. listen to this. >> we're in great shape though. we have 12 cases, 11 cases. and many of them were in good shape now. when you have 15 people and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero, that's a pretty good job we've done. one day it's like a miracle, it will disappear. and from our shores it could get worse before it gets better. we'll see what happens. stay calm. it will go away. you know it is going away. and it will go away. and we're going to have a great

victory. >> so, jamie, how did the president explain this? >> so, the president has said he's just trying to keep people calm. but let's remember that he has not been consistent on this message. this is something he has continued to say. he still mocks people wearing masks. it's hard to imagine. but just to put in perspective, we have one more piece of sound from woodward interview with trump. this is on march 19th when the president reveals two things. first of all, he's been saying publicly that young people don't get it, that they're going to be okay. and he addresses that. and the second thing is he admits that he is purposefully not telling the american public what he knows. let's listen to that interview.

>> now it's turning out it's not just old people, bob. just today and yesterday some startling facts came out. it's not just old -- >> yeah, exactly. so, give me a moment of talking to somebody going through this with fauci or somebody who kind of it caused a pivot in your mind. because it's clear just from what's on the public record that you went through pivot on this to, oh, my god, the gravity is almost inexplicable and unexplainable. >> well, i think, bob, really, to be honest with you -- >> sure, i want you to be. >> i wanted to always play it down. i still like playing it down because i don't want to create a panic. >> you know, wolf, but this isn't just about creating a

panic. let's just put this in some perspective. after 9/11, the american public rallied. after pearl harbor, the american public rallied. president trump told bob woodward that he thought being president meant two things, to keep the country safe and prosperous. and you just -- he failed on keeping it safe. you have to wonder whether the panic was more about the economy and getting re-elected, wolf. >> you have to wonder indeed. jamie, the president has frequently been at odds with the top medical experts advising him on the virus. what does woodward report in his brand new book about the president's relationship with dr. anthony fauci? >> so, the american public has gotten to know dr. anthony fauci, and woodward quotes fauci. and what is typical in a woodward book is that he records

all of his interviews with the permission of the subject. and anthony fauci says the following about the president. he says his leadership is, quote, rutterless. he says the president's attention span is like a minus number. and he says his sole purpose is to get re-elected. we should say that dr. fauci did an interview today where he was backtracking saying he didn't remember this. but my understanding is that these were all direct quotes from dr. fauci. >> very significant indeed. jamie, the revelations from bob woodward's book also include eye-opening major national security issues. i've gone through some of them. he reports, for example, that top-level officials were deeply concerned about how close the u.s. came to nuclear war with north korea back in 2017.

james mattis was then the defense secretary. how seriously did he take the threat of a nuclear war with north korea? >> you know, it's interesting. there's a quote from secretary of state pompeo saying they never knew whether it was a bluff or not. but then mattis took it so seriously and was so worried about getting into a hot war with north korea that the book describes these extraordinary scenes where mattis is going to the national cathedral repeatedly to pray. because he is worried and it's on his conscience what if they get into a hot war, what if a million people get killed? the other detail is that secretary -- then secretary mattis was actually sleeping in his clothes or shorts, something

appropriate because he was ready to get up in the middle of the night and monitor any kind of strike. so, there is -- apart from covid, there is a striking story within the book about our relations with north korea. >> and woodward also reviewed some 27 letters exchanged between president trump and the north korea leader kim jong-un. cnn, i understand, has now obtained copies of two of those letters. what can you tell us? >> so, get ready, wolf. these are very unusual letters. president trump has referred to them as, quote, love letters. just to give you a sense, this is not the kind of language you normally hear between two leaders of two countries. so we have from one letter, this is a letter from kim jong-un to president trump on december 25th, 2018. even now i cannot forget that moment of history when i firmly

held your excellency's hand. he calls trump "your excellency" a lot. at the beautiful and sacred location as the whole world watched with great interest and hope to relive the honor of that day. letter number two. oh, this is further down in that same letter. as we enter the new year, the whole world will certainly once again come to see not so far in the future another historic meeting between myself and your excellency. again to trump, reminiscent of a scene from a fantasy film. i don't know exactly what that is. but you don't normally hear that. we also have obtained a letter from june 10th, 2019. i also believe that the deep and special friendship between us will work as a magical force that leads the progress of

dprk/u.s. relations. one footnote to all of this. you don't really know reading the book how woodward obtained letters. but there is what i would say is a hint about them. because president trump says to woodward about his having the letters on january 20th in an interview trump says those are so top secret you can't mock kim. i don't want to get into an effing nuclear war because you mocked him. woodward, i'm not going to mock him. but, if i had to guess, those letters had to get to woodward via the white house. and we posted two of them on cnn.com, wolf. >> woodward also reveals that the then director of national intelligence dan coates, a man i

know you know, believed that russian president putin actually had compromising information on president trump. tell us about that. >> this i think is one of the most shocking stories in the book because then dni top intelligence official dan coates tells woodward that he has harbored this secret concern that trump -- that russia had something on trump. and i just want to read you a little bit of what woodward write. woodward says that coates suspected the worst but found nothing that would show that trump was indeed in putin's pocket. he and staff members examined the intelligence as carefully as possible. so they're so concerned, wolf, that they're actually going and looking. there was no proof, period, woodward writes. but coates' doubts continued, never fully dissipating.

so, this notion that coates, even as he left, could not shake the suspicions that russia had something on trump. that is startling. and woodward writes that coates understood how stunning that was that the top intelligence official would have those doubts. >> i was in helsinki when president trump met with putin and he sided with putin and basically discarded what the u.s. intelligence community was saying, and that was a real slap in the face of the director of national intelligence dan coates. the topic of race, jamie, what did the president have to say in this book? >> so, it's interesting. bob woodward tried to talk to him about race and racism. this interview happens shortly after the president goes across the street, that famous scene where he cleared the protesters

out and holds up the bible. and he says to president trump, um -- i don't know if we have the audio of this. >> we have it. we'll play it right now. >> he asked trump about white privilege. and i think the rest you can just hear on the audiotape. >> but let me ask you this. i mean, we share one thing in common. we're white privileged, and my father was a lawyer and a judge in illinois, and we know what your dad did. do you have any sense that that privilege has isolated and put you in a cave to a certain

extent, as it put me? and i think lots of white privileged people in a cave and that we have to work our way out of it to understand the anger and the pain, particularly black people, feel in this country. >> no. you really drank the kool-aid, didn't you? listen to you, wow. no, i don't feel that at all. >> despite everything we've been through, wolf, in the last couple of months with protests, just very dismissive of the whole thing. >> there's a lot more in this book including some very, very disparaging remarks that the president makes about the u.s. military leadership. we're going to get to that later. jamie, you've done some really amazing excellent reporting for us. thank you, thank you so much. right now i want to bring in our chief white house correspondent jim acosta. he's been gathering details about the fallout. it has been so dramatic from

this new bob woodward book. first of all, jim, how is the president responding? >> i can tell you, wolf, thatted to the president responding, there is some finger-pointing going on inside the white house right now. aides pointing the finger at one another over how this was allowed to happen. i talked to a source familiar with the discussions surrounding the woodward book, a source who is familiar with -- who has direct knowledge of the situation involving setting up the interviews with bob woodward, says that both the president and bob woodward essentially went around the white house press office in setting up these interviews, these hours and hours of interviews that bob woodward had with the president, and that aides to the president told mr. trump that this was a bad idea, to sit down with bob woodward and have these sorts of free-wheeling discussions with the legendary reporter. but i did talk to a separate source familiar with the

situation who said that, hold on a second, that, you know, the president jared kushner, they may have been okay with this idea the president sitting down with bob woodward, but that according to this other source i spoke with, jared curbness was against the idea of the president doing these interviews with bob woodward. so some finger-pointing going on inside of the white house over whether or not the president should've been sitting down with bob woodward. but in the meantime we should point out just earlier this afternoon the president was asked about these revelations coming out of the woodward book that the president was intentionally downplaying the severity of the coronavirus outbreak earlier this year. the president said he was simply trying to make sure the american people did not panic over what was happening. and here's what he had to say. >> we don't want to instill panic. we don't want to jump up and down and start shouting that we have a problem that is a tremendous problem, scare everybody.

>> now, earlier this afternoon joe biden, the democratic nominee, he seized on this during a campaign event in michigan. biden was accusing the president of lying about the severity of the outbreak, severity of the coronavirus outbreak to the american people. here's what joe biden had to say. >> he knew about covid-19 that it passed through the air. he knew how deadly it was. it was much more deadly than the flu. he knew and purposefully played it down. worse, he lied to the american people. he knowingly and willingly lied about the threat it posed to the country for months. >> and getting back to that finger-pointing on going on inside the white house, you have one source telling us right now, wolf, that both the president and jared kushner thought it was a good idea for thedown with bo do this interview, have a separate source familiar with some of these discussions going on saying that, no, jared kushner did not think this was a

good idea for the president to do these interviews with bob woodward. interestingly, though, wolf, both of those sources are telling me, and i have another source telling me this at this hour, that senator lindsey graham who is a close confidant of the president, he was urging the president to do these interviews with bob woodward. so lots of finger-pointing going on over whether or not the president should've done this. that is a very strong indication. there are a lot of people inside the white house inside trump world who think that this could be very damaging for the president, wolf. >> it's really amazing reporting by bob woodward again. he's been doing this for years and years, for decades. our hats off to him. a great, great journalist. jim acosta, thank you very much. we have a lot to go over with our experts and analysts. let me bring in dr. sanjay gupta first. sanjay, you just heard the president of the united states on tape admitting back in early february that the coronavirus was more deadly than even your

strenuous flu. but when you pushed him on that, you were in the white house briefing room asking a very important question. he said something very different publicly. i want to play that exchange. listen to this. >> the flu and in comparison to the coronavirus. flu has a fatality ratio of about 0.1%. >> correct. >> this has a fatality rate somewhere between 2 and 3%. >> we don't know exactly. >> based on the numbers so far -- >> and the flu is much higher than that. >> there are more people who get the flu. but this is going to spread within communities. does that worry you? because that seems to be what worries the american people. >> no because we're ready for it. it is what it is. we're ready for it. we're really prepared. as i said, we have the greatest people in the world. we're very ready for it. we hope it doesn't spread. there's a chance that it won't spread too. and there's a chance that it will. >> he knew, sanjay, that the

virus was airborne, that it was deadly. and that's what he said to bob woodward in early february when you had that exchange with him. he was saying something totally different to the american public. and it's really inexplicable given how serious and how many thousands of americans might've been saved if he simply would've been honest. >> yeah. wolf, you know, i think since that exchange, which was on february 27th, so about three weeks after you heard him tell bob woodward that it was definitely more lethal than the flu, five times more lethal than the flu he said. i always wondered after i had that exchange did he know it was more deadly or did he not yet know? until now, until today, wolf, i just wasn't sure the answer to that question. but clearly the president knew ahead of time that this was more lethal than the flu. he even said five times more

lethal than the flu. which is striking because that is close to the right number. flu has a 0.1% mortality where is this is around 6% or more mortality. and he knew and that's i think the thing that has concerned me. how much of a difference would it have made if we started to act early in this country? i'll just show you quickly, wolf, columbia university did this modeling. and this goes back to may. so at that point they were saying in may if we had acted earlier. remember, we went into sort of pause mode in the middle of march. if we had acted one week earlier, at that time in may 36,000 deaths could've been prevented. two weeks earlier, 84% of the deaths could've been prevented. and 82% of infections could've been prevented. that's extraordinary, wolf. the thing about public health measures is that when you do them early when you implement them early, they have a huge

impact. you could have prevented it from spreading it as much as it has and prevented people from dying. >> it turned out to be a truly life and death decision. let's take south korea, for example. they were warning everyone in the country how deadly it was. and other countries were doing the same thing. the president of the united states was not. >> yeah. wolf, i think that's absolutely right and it's a fundamental point. so people often say, well, this is five times deadlier than the flu. so by definition five times as many people will die of this as die of the flu. that's not the way to think about it. the way to think about it is how you just presented it. if you go to south korea, and we mentioned south korea because their first patient was diagnosed on the same day the first patient was diagnosed in the united states. it's a fair comparison in this regard. a smaller country. but even if you keep up with the math, so far they've had under 350 people die total in the

country. and obviously you know the numbers here. closer to 190,000. so, yes, this was far more lethal than the flu. but it did not mean it needed to kill more people than the flu because we could have identified the problem and we could have acted. this is a fundamental point because people keep saying, hey, look, you say that the flu is deadlier. the flu from a lethality point is 0.1% and this is closer to 5, 6%. but we could have acted in a way to prevent those deaths. and i think that's going to be one of the great lessons i think of this entire pandemic. >> stand by, sanjay. i want to bring dr. len into this conversation. back in early february what he said on tape to bob woodward, for example, shouldn't the president have been addressing this pandemic both in public

very, very boldly and tell the american people how dangerous it was, wear masks immediately, engage in social distancing, be careful out there? instead of saying in the days and weeks that followed it's a hoax, don't worry about it, it's going to go away, we've got 15 cases, it'll go eventually down to zero. if we had been as honest with the american public as he was with bob woodward in early february, tens of thousands of americans who have died might've been alive right now. >> absolutely, wolf. and our response now would be so different. because i think -- and i think so many of us have said this many times sanjay has said this many times too that our entire response has been hampered by the mixed messaging that president trump has had. and now we know that this mixed messaging is not just wrong, it's deliberately misleading. and that's extremely distressing. i think about all the patients

i've treated who have lost their lives or who have recovered but have long-term effects because of covid-19. i think about the individuals who now don't have their jobs because we had all these shutdowns that had to occur but actually could have been prevented if we just acted sooner. and i know the president has said, well, i didn't want to cause panic and cause fear, but the best antidote to fear is the truth. that's exactly what president trump should've done all along, which is to explain everything that he knew. because this is about reassuring the american people. it's about taking action that the federal government needs to do when it comes to setting up testing, when it comes to setting up this national strategy. but also advising the american people about the things that we can do in order to protect ourselves and our loved ones. and to know that that information was on hand that the president knew about it but decided not to share it with the american people, it's really truly devastating. >> that whole month of february

turned out to be a waste, if the president would've done in early february what he eventually wound up doing in mid-march and even later, thousands of americans would be alive right now. let me go back to sanjay for a moment. sanjay, dr. anthony fauci is quoted in bob woodward's book as telling others that the president's leadership was, in his word, rudderless. was that evident in this federal response? >> well, the strategy was to not talk about it. so i guess to that extent it was rudderless. rudderless to me means you do something one day, you do something else the other day, there was no sort of logic to it. this was a clear minimizing of this problem. even as we saw what was happening in other countries around the world. we talked so much about what was happening in italy in those early days and sort of saying, that's italy. that could happen here and still what actions were we taking? we weren't testing. we didn't have these sort of

plans in place to prevent that from happening. so we kept having these warning signs and we didn't act. so if that's rudderless, then perhaps. but there was no action. as you mentioned, it was a lost month. and it's really devastating to hear. february 7th, he knows it's five times deadlier than the flu. he knows that if we take action, it could probably save a lot of lives. there's even a plan i think that was presented to the president in terms of what to do. some of those small public health measures taken at that time could've had a significant benefit. >> professor haseltine, how important is it to have a leader who pays a lot of attention to detail during a public health crisis like this one? >> well, it's obviously very important. and i would say there is a

couple of major points that we've learned now. it's one thing to say don't panic. it's another thing not to plan. i think all of us in the public health area are absolutely appalled at the still no consistent plan to control this. you have somebody in the white house now, dr. atlas, who says herd immunity, just let it go. that is not a plan. that's a plan for death in the millions, not the hundreds of thousands. you asked us the question how many people could've been saved out of 190,000 that have died? my guess is 180,000 of those. we have killed 180,000 of our fellow americans because we have not been honest with the truth. we have not planned. and even today we're ignoring the threat that lies ahead. if you look toward christmas, that number 190,000 might be

400,000, as you and i have discussed before. >> who do you blame for that, professor haseltine? >> i think the only way you can blame -- the other thing that's really interesting, who told trump about this problem? it was president xi. the very source that he has excoriated for causing this pandemic. it was the chinese that gave and the leader of the chinese people that gave trump the information that he related to bob woodward. and to attack the source and then not do anything with that information, i think there is only one place you can lay these wreaths is at the feet of somebody who knew and ignored the problem. >> the bob woodward book also says at the end of january the president's national security adviser o'brien specifically also warned the president this was airborne, it was very deadly. you got to deal with this. and he's quoted as saying this

could be and probably will be the most significant national security threat to the united states since the great flu back in 1918. and it's turned out to be such an enormous threat to u.s. national security. the president was warned repeatedly, professor haseltine. yet, he waited, and as you point out he waited way too long. >> well, he waited and is still waiting. we still don't have a plan to control this epidemic. you know, if you look at what people did with 9/11, what they did with pearl harbor, they did calm the american people as best they could. but they planned, they executed, and eventually we were victorious. we are not victorious now. victory means what happens in other countries where nobody is dying. that's victory. that's not 40,000 people getting

infect bed a day and almost 2,000 people dying a day. that's defeat. >> if the president were to make a decision tonight or tomorrow, go and deliver an oval office address to the american public and specifically state here is what everyone needs to do right now in order to save thousands of american lives, some of these projections as professor haseltine point out, there could be 400,000 americans dead by january 1st. what would you like to hear the president say in such an oval office address knowing what we all know right now? >> acknowledge the seriousness of this pandemic, which is something that he has repeatedly not done over the course of these many months, except apparently in these tapes that we have now. so to recognize how it is so tragic and so devastating that nearly 200,000 people, americans now have lost their lives and we have many more on the way.

then i want to hear the president say here is what the federal government is going to do now. i would love to hear a national strategy of some kind being announced. a national strategy that absolutely includes widespread accessible testing, that includes getting treatment to individuals, that also clouds the importance of letting science and public health lead this response. and then i want the president to tell the american people and then model the kind of behavior that he expects the american people to have as well, and by now we have more information than we did last month certainly than we did back in february and march. we know what the specific interventions are that will make a big difference. universal mask wearing is something that will make a big difference. we know that universal mask wearing will save 100,000 lives between now and the end of the year. that's twice as many people as died from breast cancer last year. that's something we can do right now in order to save lives. and we should be practicing social distancing. we should be limiting indoor gatherings, going outdoors as much as possible. we should not have large

gatherings. and i would love to hear the president say from now on i will be donning a mask wherever it is i go. i recognize that because i have testing and all the other individuals around me have testing, that should be made available to all the american people. from now on i will not be holding large rallies and gatherings that could be potential super spreader events. this is all based on science. and i would love to hear the president take the actions now that we have been wanting for many months. >> sanjay, it was so upsetting the other day when the president was actually making fun of his democratic rival, the democratic presidential nominee joe biden for wearing a mask and he was making fun of him. >> yeah. i mean, there is still this feeling. i think there's two things. one is that a book like this comes out and there's this idea that we're looking at this now in the rear view mirror that this is sort of the retrospective. it's not. we're still very much in this, as i think you're saying, wolf.

and the idea that some basic public health measures can still make a significant difference going forward i think is really important. look, i think it's very hard to sugar coat what has happened here, wolf. i want to be optimistic and say there are still things that we need to do, and there are. but as dr. haseltine was saying, as leana was saying, so many people have died. if this were a patient, it'd be kind of like saying at the time the patient had localized disease, very small treatment would be necessary to treat it and the patient did not undergo that treatment and now the disease has spread, and we'd like to say -- we'd like to just turn back the clock and say let's go back to doing these simple treatments that we could have done with significant impact at the beginning. we don't have that option anymore. it doesn't mean we shouldn't act. but there has been a lot of damage done now, wolf, and now it's a question about mitigating the damage. you've seen the models. they say if everyone, you went to 95% of the country wearing masks, you could potentially

save 120,000 lives by the end of the year. but you know what, wolf? that also means that probably another 100,000 people will die regardless at this point, which is just -- that did not need to happen, wolf. >> let's not forget more than 6 million americans -- 6.3 million americans have actually come down with coronavirus. and many of them, they may have survived but they could potentially have some long-term ramifications from this illness. and they've gone through very, very rough periods, 6.3 million americans have tested positive for coronavirus over these past few months. dana bash, we just got an exchange that our jake tapper had with joe biden in michigan just a few moments ago he went up there to interview the democratic presidential nominee. i want to play this exchange that jake had with joe biden, and then we'll discuss. listen to this. >> mr. vice president, thanks so much for doing this.

i appreciate it. >> happy to do it. >> so, some big breaking news in his upcoming book, bob woodward reports that president trump understood the serious risk posed by the novel coronavirus in early february. take a listen to what the president told woodward february 7th. >> you just breathe the air and that's how it's passed. and so that's a very tricky one. that's a very delicate one. it's also more deadly than even your strenuous flus. this is deadly stuff. >> as you know, the president spent much of february and even march downplaying the risks of the novel coronavirus saying it would disappear, saying the heat would make it go away. what's your response to this news about what he was telling bob woodward on february 7th? >> it's disgusting. we learned this on a day that 190,000 americans were dead and he knew this.

i understood he had just gotten off the phone when he did the first interview with woodward, he had just gotten off the phone with xi jinping where he was praising xi jinping about transparency and this is going to go away like a miracle. what in god's name would a man like -- i don't get it. i truly don't get it. it's like the way he talks about our veterans. it's astounding to me. >> well, the way that president trump explains, and he said this to woodward on march 19th if you take a listen. >> i wanted to always play it down. i still like playing it down. >> yes. >> because i don't want to create a panic. >> he said something similar this afternoon. he said he didn't want to create a panic. that's why he downplayed it. he said leadership is about confidence. >> yeah. and that's why we have no confidence in his leadership. i mean, look, you saw what columbia medical school pointed out in march. had he acted one week earlier, there'd be over 31,000 more people alive.

if they added two weeks earlier it would've been 50-some thousand alive. he acknowledges you breathe it, it's in the air and he won't put on the mask. he's talking about it's ridiculous to put on masks, what do you need social distancing for, why have any of these rules? it was all about making sure the stock market didn't come down, that his wealthy friends didn't lose any money and that he could say that in fact anything that happened had nothing to do with him. he waved the white flag. he didn't do a damn thing. think about it. think about what he did not do. and it's almost criminal. >> almost criminal. dana, very, very strong words. a very tough response from the democratic presidential nominee. >> look, he's trying to channel the anger that so many people in this country have, frustration, the anxiety, already even before we heard from the president in these tapes from earlier this

year. the fact that the president kind of fed right into joe biden's campaign message, it would be surprising if joe biden can't jump on that. and when i say fed into his campaign message, from the beginning even before joe biden won the primaries, he said his whole reason for running, even though he never thought he would run for president again, was the void in leadership, was the fact that this president needs to be replaced by somebody who understands how to -- has experience. and the fact that he -- and all of us have now heard the president say that his form of leadership is to downplay a virus and not deal with it. of course joe biden is going to react like that. but i think the fact that he is being so intense and so strong, i have no doubt that that is authentic on joe biden's part. but also his campaign believes

helped him connect to people who are feeling the same way right now. >> yeah. and it's not just joe biden. millions of americans presumably once they get the full scope of what the president knew in early february and didn't do to protect the american public. there's going to be a lot of outrage and not just from joe biden but from a lot of other people as well. dana, everybody, stand by. we're going to have much more on the explosive details revealed in the brand new bob woodward book right after a quick break. (vo) verizon knows how to build unlimited right. start with america's most awarded network. i'm on my phone 24/7. (vo) then, for the first time ever, include disney+, hulu, and espn+. we're a big soccer family. "handmaid's tale." i love "frozen." (vo) then give families plans to mix and match so you only pay for what you need. you get so much more, and it's a great network. (vo) with plans starting at just $35. plus, get up to $1,000 off our best phones when you switch. the network more people rely on gives you more. that's verizon. i'm a sustainability science researcher at amazon.

climate change is the fight of our generation. the biggest obstacle right now is that we're running out of time. amazon now has a goal to be net zero carbon by 2040. we don't really know exactly how we are going to get there. it's going to be pretty hard. but one way or another we're going to reduce our carbon footprint to net zero. i want my son to know that i tried my hardest to make things better for his generation.

to save you up to 60%. these are all great. and when you get a big deal... ♪ ...you feel like a big deal. ♪ priceline. every trip is a big deal.

we're following multiple breaking stories as a result of bob woodward's soon to be released book. a copy obtained by cnn includes very damning comments from the president's former national security advisers.

joining us now the former u.s. defense secretary william cohen and retired general wesley clark. general clark, in addition to making very disparaging remarks about fallen u.s. troops, woodward gives yet another account of the president denigrating the u.s. military leadership. he says this, and i'll put the quote up on the screen, a few words, my effing generals are a bunch of ps. they care more about their alliances than they do about trade deals. let's talk a little bit about that. when you hear that kind of denigration of the top u.s. military brass, the generals, the admirals. what do you say? >> well, first of all it's very consistent with other things that president trump has said and done. he clearly doesn't understand the value of the alliances. president trump is a transactional person. he values everything on the basis of money. he wants it now. and so i'll give you this, i'll give you that.

what's made the united states so powerful. what has made america great is our consistency, our reliability, our ability to hold together long-term alliances based on common interests, common goes and working together when there are differences that would drive us apart. president trump has apparently sought to accentuate these differences. for him i guess it's all about money. he doesn't understand national security. he doesn't understand what's made america great. and he certainly doesn't understand the ethics and the qualities of our senior leaders in uniform. >> you know, it's interesting, general clark, is in the bob woodward book, he quotes the former trump defense secretary jim mattis, a retired general himself, as saying that sources quoting general mattis is saying that president trump was dangerous, unfit, and lacked a moral compass. how concerning is that to you to hear that kind of talk from the former defense secretary?

>> well, it should be a real concern for every american. those of us who followed it closely have -- we basically came to this judgment some time ago. and jim obviously came to this judgment. that's why he left the position of defense secretary. but, wolf, this is the kind of information that needs to sink in to the american people. the president, when he's seen up close and judged by mad dog mattis, and they looked at his policies, his decisionmaking, his character, his personalities, his ethics. they say he's dangerous and unfit. that's a very, very powerful indictment of a sitting president. >> stand by, general. i want to bring in secretary cohen into this conversation. secretary, so when you heard all the revelations about the u.s. military leadership that are now reported in this brand new bob woodward book, what went through your mind? >> what went through my mind was

his violation of his duty to the united states. he has pledged to protect and defend against all enemies sworn and domestic. he has failed to protect us against vladimir putin who entered into our 2016 election. he's doing the same now. he's failed to protect us against him. he's failed to defend us against the virus. now he has pledged to be a he has pledged to be a war time commander. you have an invisible enemy that attacked states and what the commander-in-chief has said is you're on your own. we're not getting involved because it is a state issue. i don't know of any commander-in-chief who would allow an enemy to attack a state and say you're on your own. he has violated every oath. he has lied. he has denied. now he is seeking to divide. he is seeking to divide our

soldiers, sailors, marines, coast guardsmen from the commanding officers and to say that they are only kind of middle men or war merchants i think is an absolute criminal activity to indict our highest most effective leaders in the world, our military. it only confirms what we've known. he is unfit to serve as commander-in-chief. we'll have a chance to pass that judgment on him in november but it can't come fast enough. >> it is interesting. in the book and we reported this earlier, bob woodward reveals that the then trump director of national intelligence, a man you know former senator dan coates, he actually believed russia had something on president trump and as a result that is why the president repeatedly was dismissing concerns about his ties to russia. what do you think, secretary?

>> let's go back to the fact he never released his tax returns. he said they are under audit. they have been under audit for 20, 25 years. there is obviously something he doesn't want to be made public. so i think there is something there. that putin does have something on him. and i think it's one of the reasons why he has never offered a word of criticism against putin himself. as a matter of fact, he is corrupting the intelligence that we're receiving because he let it be known don't bring me any news that involves the name vladimir putin. so what you're doing now is you're really toning down and corrupting the intelligence process which is fundamental to the defense of this country. what our intelligence community says really matters to the commander-in-chief to know what the threats are, who the threats are, and how do we defend against them to deter them, defeat them, and really to overwhelm the enemy in terms of what they're trying to do to us. i think intelligence is

critical. the people he has are critical. for him to degrade in any way the people over at the pentagon, the joint chiefs of staff, to say they're sissies, that he wouldn't fight with them, he wouldn't wage a war with them, what does that do to the soldiers out there putting their lives on the line every day to say that the commander-in-chief doesn't trust their commanders? that goes all the way down the chain of command as general clark can certainly attest to. >> thank you so much to both of you and thank you for your service as well. we'll have more details coming up from the book including a very, very revealing exchange that bob woodward had with the president about race in america. cnn's brian todd is joining us right now. so, brian, tell us what you're learning. >> reporter: wolf, bob woodward tried to pry open the president's soul when it comes to race. their exchanges reflect a president who still very firmly believes in his stand on the

issue. bob woodward put the question bluntly to president trump. in one of the interviews he did with the president for his new book "rage" the investigative journalist asked trump whether the white privilege he experienced in his youth put him in a cave, isolated him. >> it put me and i think lots of white, privileged people in a cave and that we have to work our way out of it to understand the anger and the pain, particularly black people feel in this country. >> no, you really drank the kool-aid. listen to you. wow. no. i don't feel bad at all. >> in one conversation with woodward trump escalated his contempt for former president barack obama saying, quote, i don't think obama is smart. i think he is highly overrated, and i don't think he is a great speaker. trump told woodward he often wanted to refer to obama by his first and middle names barack hussein but he wouldn't do that in his presence so he could be,

quote, very nice. >> he started his politics on trying to delegitimize the first black president of the united states. at the end of the day, it's more than just that. there is a personal angst against president obama. >> reporter: many of the president's divisive comments have been directed toward black women in leadership and he tweeted the four congresswomen of color who form the so-called squad on capitol hill should, quote, go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. he has referred to democratic congresswoman maxine waters as having a, quote, low i.q. one of his new favorite targets? democratic vice presidential nominee kamala harris. >> she could never be the first woman president. she could never be. that would be an insult to our country. >> certainly in his presidency he has used race as a divisive issue. he has played to white voters and not to the entire country.

>> reporter: the president apparently doesn't see it that way telling bob woodward, quote, i've done a tremendous amount for the black community and honestly i'm not feeling any love. some who have known donald trump for decades believe racially polarizing comments are more than a political tool for the president. former trump lawyer michael cohen also out with a new book told nbc news of a conversation he had with trump after nelson mandela died. >> he asked me if i had known of any country that's run by a black that's not an s hole and i said how about america? which he gave me the proverbial f you. >> a former ceo of one of trump's hotels believes it goes even deeper. >> cohen's description, his characterization that trump believes blacks have a lower intelligence, it's absolutely true. he said these things 30 years ago. >> and the white house has just responded to our request for a response to our story. the individuals, this is from a

spokesman, quote, the individuals you cite have slandered the president verbally attacking his supporters and covered his administration with animosity, bias, and lies. and he will not sit by and allow this hateful rhetoric to go unresponded to. donald trump's record as a private citizen and as president has been one of fighting for inclusion and advocating for the equal treatment of all. anyone who suggests otherwise is only seeking to sow division and ignore the president's work for under served communities and also cited the president's work to fund historically black colleges and universities and create opportunities. >> thanks very much, brian todd reporting. we'll have more on our top story. truly stunning revelations from bob woodward's new book on the trump white house including an admission from the president on tape that he deliberately misled the american people about the severity of the coronavirus. memory... focus...

accuracy... learning and concentration. try it today with our money-back guarantee!

we welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer in "the

situation room" following major breaking news on president trump's efforts to mislead americans about the danger of coronavirus, the president admitting to journalist bob woodward that he knew back in early february that the virus was extremely deadly but he decided to deliberately downplay it to the public to avoid what he called panic. stand by to hear from the president as he spelled all of that out in his own words in recorded interviews with bob woodward for his brand new book. also tonight, as the u.s. death toll from the pandemic now climbs above 190,000 americans, joe biden just told cnn's jake tapper that president trump's downplaying of the pandemic is, quote, disgusting. we're also getting new reaction this hour to other bombshells from woodward's book involvng the president's insults of generals and admirals and distrust in the pain and anger