Skip to main content

tv   Don Lemon Tonight  CNN  December 8, 2021 11:00pm-12:00am PST

11:00 pm
them out and they commit more crime and more crime. now it's become a battle over bail. some among us have got to stay locked up. that's my view, and it's gotten completely out of control. others have had unjust sentences, and somewhere in the middle as is usually the case lies the truth. thank you for watching, i'll be back here tomorrow night. don lemon tonight starts right now. >> i have a nostalgic story about john timiny. i remember i was in rittenhouse square covering it was the south side rapist, i believe. >> it was a jogging rapist. >> no, no, it was the one who was in doing it in rittenhouse -- i forget, center city, the center city rapist, and john was doing a live shot and he walked right up during the live shot and i got this great exclusive. but he was great. he was very open to talking to the media. >> good guy. left us too soon. good friend. >> yeah, absolutely. great stuff. i'm glad you're brave enough again to read those comments. i would never do it but more power to you, brother.
11:01 pm
i'll see you tomorrow night. have a good one, thank you very much. this is "don lemon tonight." we've got a lot. got to wonder what mark meadows is trying so hard to hide. serio seriously, think about this. the former president's chief of staff is cooperating until he wasn't. with the committee investigating the attack on the united states capitol on january 6th. now meadows is suing the committee and he's suing nancy pelosi as well. he wants a federal court to block the subpoena from the committee as well as one to verizon for his phone records. it seems like there is something in there that he really doesn't want you to see, and it's probably no coincidence that meadows' lawsuit comes after the committee said it is moving forward with criminal contempt for that whole cooperating then and then not cooperating thing. but the fact is, they've got plenty from him already like a november 6, 2020, text exchange
11:02 pm
with an unnamed member of congress about a plan to appoint alternate electors in some states, a plan which that member in an impressive display of understatement called highly controversial. meadows saying i love it. there's also an early january text exchange between meadows and an organizer of the january 6th stop the steal rally. it's all in there communicating. look, he was a member of the president's staff. the president was going to speak at this rally. they were communicating, but is it suspicious? i don't know. we'll see. we'll find out during the investigation. it's no secret what the strategy is here, though, run out the clock. stall until the midterms when the gop is counting on taking control of congress, and it seems like there are plenty of republicans who are willing to sink to any level to spend their time trolling and feeding the fake outrage machine instead of actually governing. and their so-called leadership is so spineless they're afraid to call out any of it. kevin mccarthy is hiding instead of bringing the hammer down on members like lauren boebert for
11:03 pm
her blasant islamaphobia against ilhan omar. that is happening as progressives are demanding boebert lose her committee assignments. >> i'm confident that there will be action taken, and there must because inaction is to be complicit in islamophobia. i am confident that we will reach a resolution resulting in accountability, and every option must be on the table. because without accountability, we embolden further action like this. >> we need to start this lying islamophobia, race-baiting, inciting white supremacist sentiment spreading, christmas tree gun toting elected official who is out here straight up calling her colleagues terrorists. lauren boebert is a danger to this country. she is a danger to the muslim staffers that work here. she is a danger to her fellow
11:04 pm
members of congress. >> and so it's important to know, of course ilhan omar when i check up on her, she's like, sis, i survived war. i survived this. she says that so i can stop crying, but i also know that this is hard. this is hard for all of us. >> and let us not forget lauren boebert's christmas photo, i hate to even give this any air time. christmas photo showing her four boys all holding guns in response to this one from thomas massie. alexandria ocasio-cortez tweeting, quote, tell me again where my christ says use a commemoration of my birth to flex violent weapons for personal political gain, lol. in all the years the republicans spent on cultural hysteria of society erasing christmas, its meaning, when they're doing that fine all on their own.
11:05 pm
listen, don't get caught up in back and forth. that is exactly what they want you to do, to get caught up in the left, right back and forth. don't do it. we know what is going on here. the gun toting or should i say the gun posing posers, republicans are putting on a show for the base. outrage, owning the libs is what they do when they should be governing. you know the job that they were elected to do. kevin mccarthy is afraid to publicly call it out telling members behind closed doors not it attack each other. he is too afraid to take a stand. republican dan crenshaw blasting boebert and company. >> there's two types of members of congress. there's performance artists, there's legislators, and the performance artists are the ones that get all the attention, are the ones you think are more conservative because they know how to say slogans real well. they know how to recite the lines that they know that our voters want to hear. we have grifters in our midst, not here, not like in this room, that's not what i mean.
11:06 pm
i mean in the conservative movement. lie after lie after lie because they know something psychologically about the conservative heart. we're worried about what people are going to do to us, what they're going to infringe upon us. >> wow. grifters. that's what dan crenshaw called them, grifters, and lie after lie after lie. interesting. because when someone other than a republican says that, then they are somehow a lib. other republicans have to stand up. have to come to some sense of sanity, someplace of sanity. because of kevin mccarthy's spinelessness as a leader allowing the crack pot wing of his party to hold him hostage and to hold the party hostage. how do you solve a problem like
11:07 pm
lauren boebert? she's not the only one but how do you solve a problem like that? kicking people off committees could be a double-edged swords. vulnerable democrats telling cnn they don't want to vote on that. they're worried it's an unnecessary distraction as they fight to hold onto the majority. look, a lot of this stuff crosses the line. sometimes losing their committee assignments is warranted, but you could also be playing right into their hands by giving them more attention, which is something that we struggle with every single night on this program. can we put the crazy grifty tweets of lauren boebert up because she's trying to make money off an appeal to the crack pot wing nut part of her party. do we put that up? does that actually help americans? does it inform our viewers and our electorate? in some ways i guess you need to know about it, but it's just
11:08 pm
playing right into her hands because she wants it out there. because she thinks it's cool and funny and it's going to help her, and maybe it will. who knows? the real problem here, though, is the ineptitude of gop leadership and their unwillingness to clean up their own mess. will we just end up in an endless cycle of trolling and stripping assignments while people like matt gaetz hijack the party, demanding answers to what he claims is the fbi's involvement in january 6th? again, something do we have to do it, but this is what the crazy folks are saying in the gop, predicting that gop will take power. watch. >> we are going to take power after this next election, and when we do, it's not going to be the days of paul ryan and trey gowdy, and no real oversight, and no real subpoenas. it's going to be the days of jim jordan and marjorie taylor greene and dr. gosar, and myself
11:09 pm
doing everything to get the answers to these questions. >> look, that's what you all want? that's what you all get. meanwhile, there is real work to be done in this country, and our democracy is at risk from the assault on the vote. listen to what the former president barack obama says about that tonight. >> unfortunately we've got one party that actually doesn't want to see government work and get stuff done, and rather than argue based on their ideas, they're trying to tilt the playing field, and they're not even waiting for election day to do it. you know, their plan is to control state legislatures and congressional delegations before a single vote is cast. that's not how democracy is supposed to work.
11:10 pm
and our democracy is essential to who we are. it is what makes america exceptional, and it shouldn't be a partisan issue. it did not used to be. >> but here we are, and here we are with the developing news now. mark meadows that lawsuit against the select committee investigating january 6th. let's discuss now, cnn congressional correspondent ryan nobles is here. cnn senior legal analyst lauren coats joins us as well. author of a book i have read, "just pursuit: a black prosecutor's fight for fairness" i would suggest you pick it up. is it in preorder now or -- okay. it is? >> it is, absolutely. thank you, don. >> we'll discuss all of that later. let's get to the news at hand now. walk us through what this lawsuit with mark meadows is about. what is he arguing here? >> essentially what he wants to do, don, is having a court tell the january 6th select committee
11:11 pm
that he is not needed to follow through on their subpoena request, and he has a number of legal theories that he kind of throws at the wall here to try and compel the court to do so. among them claiming that the january 6th select committee doesn't have authority because of its partisan makeup and a number of other things. he also makes passing reference to executive privilege claims from the former president donald trump, but at the end of the day suggests that the committee just doesn't have the legal authority to access his personal information. and he talks specifically about a phone records request that the committee has subpoenaed verizon, the telecom company to provide them. now, the committee just really isn't buying this. they feel as though this is just another stall and delay tactic on the part of mark meadows and liz cheney who we caught up with this evening said quote, this committee has received a number of extremely interesting non-privileged documents from mr. meadows. these include text messages and
11:12 pm
emails from his private cell phone and private email account. he's produced these documents. they are not privileged. and that's kind of the interesting part in all of this, don. you know, just a couple of days ago mark meadows said that he was going to cooperate with the committee. he handed over 6,000 documents. he was scheduled to sit for a deposition this morning. those documents revealed a lot of information, text message exchanges with members of congress and rally organizers and others. for some reason in the last 24 hours he decided he did not want to comply, did not want to cooperate, filed this lawsuit today and now he's facing a criminal contempt referral. >> laura, the trump era has become the lawsuit litigation era. you heard from congresswoman cheney there, she is throwing cold water all over meadows' lawsuit. does it hold any legal water? >> no, it doesn't. she should throw cold water. imagine that, you are able to hand over 6,000 pages of documents and think you can be questioned on none of it. executive privilege is about the
11:13 pm
scope and the specificity of the questions. you can't just say i don't want to show up at all. i don't want to appear for whatever reason. what you have to do as any other person in litigation with the federal government, if you're issued a subpoena, you must comply. you must answer the questions that you believe you are entitled to answer, of course, and don't have -- if you have no valid claim of privilege you must answer. you can litigate the specific questions, but just coming in and saying, you know what, i've already handed over, i've already made public to you documents. i've produced 6,000, not one question can be answered? how about your name? how about the communication with people who were not the president of the united states. the funny thing about privilege is once you start to articulate and convey the information, you can actually talk about the privilege. if you and i are in litigation and i talk to my attorney about something and then i tell you or the public, whatever privilege correspondence i had with that attorney, if i disclose it to
11:14 pm
the public realm, well, that privilege is no longer actually tenable. it's similar for the executive branch of government because, remember, even though he does have some colorable claim as the chief of staff, we want the chief of staff to have candid conversations with the president of the united states, every single thing you've said during the tenure in the executive branch is not necessarily privileged, and the 6,000 pages of documents fair game. >> yeah. brian, you and laura both mentioned the 6,000 pages of documents that the committee got from mark meadows. now that we've talked about it. what is in there? that's a lot of documents by the way. >> we don't know the full scope of it, don, but the committee in their letter to meadows gave us a hint. this is just a sampling of it, in early january, text to january 6th rally organizers, january 5th, an email about having the national guard on standby. he also texts trump to issue a statement to stop the attack. there was texts going back and
11:15 pm
forth about encouraging the former president to put out some sort of a statement on january 6th. there was also a powerpoint presentation, a 38-page powerpoint presentation all about election fraud and the impact that that could have on the january 6th event. and, you know, i think part of the question that the committee has, though, don is even though he handed over this massive document dump as we pointed out, 6,000 pages of documents, there's still a good chance that he cherry picked that information. he was the one in control of handing it over, and even though the committee got that information from him, they're also talking to a lot of other people that are in and around the events of january 6th, and that were talking to and connected to mark meadows. there's a real good chance if he got in front of the committee and they started asking tough questions, they'd start to see the gaps in the information he provided them. that may have been one of the reasons he backed away. they could have put him in a difficult position where he'd with forced to answer questions he didn't want to answer.
11:16 pm
>> there's so much here. meadows is the third person that the committee is moving against for criminal contempt referral after steve bannon and jeffrey clark. trump's allies are doing all they can to stone wall this. it looks like the strategy is to run out the clock here. do you think that is going to work? >> well, it is, but of course the court of appeals in d.c. does have a case where the former president is asserting executive privilege, and they would rule, you know, conceivably prior to at least the july trial date of steve bannon, who as i note does not have the kind of claimed executive privilege that somebody who was actually in the administration might or somebody who had not disclosed over a podcast might. if the strategy is to run out the clock, this is actually the norm. the idea of if congress issues a subpoena and you thumb your nose at it, you're not in compliance with the subpoena. you're required to do so. if this were everyday prosecutions not involving congress, guess what happens, you go and must comply with the season or you are held in contempt or sometimes jailed for not doing so. this is actually what you're seeing a return to normalcy. what is not normal is the
11:17 pm
continued obstinance, not just the volume of documents are at issue here. this is a former member of congress in mark meadows who is arguing that congress does not have a legitimate oversight or legislative purpose in investigating what happened on an attack on the citadel of our democracy. i mean, congress can't legislate effectively without investigating as to what happened. they either fortify something, are there additional measures for election integrity to reconvey the american people to codify in some way, shape, or form. for him to suggest because he does not want to offer at least not outside of his book that he's selling, doesn't want to offer the information is really stunning given he served in congress, knows full well about this being a coequal branch of
11:18 pm
government with legislative and accompanying investigative authority. i hope the courts see through a manipulative assertion of privilege to the extent that it's outside of the range of documents that might fall within it. >> yeah. thank you very much, ryan, thank you very much, laura. again, laura's book is called "just pursuit." it's in preorder now. if you want to know anything about the legal system we're talking about here on this show and beyond, i would suggest that you pick up this fascinating, very insightful book. thank you both. i shall see you soon. mark meadows is doing everything he can to get back on his former boss' good side, even risking the possibility of criminal prosecution, but will any of it matter to the former president? we'll discuss. ing sore throat relief. wooo vaporize sore throat pain with vicks vapocool drops. ♪ thousands of women with metastatic breast cancer
11:19 pm
are living in the moment and taking ibrance. ibrance with an aromatase inhibitor is for postmenopausal women or for men with hr+, her2- metastatic breast cancer as the first hormonal based therapy. ibrance plus letrozole significantly delayed disease progression versus letrozole. ibrance may cause low white blood cell counts that may lead to serious infections. ibrance may cause severe inflammation of the lungs. both of these can lead to death. tell your doctor if you have new or worsening chest pain, cough, or trouble breathing. before taking ibrance, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection, liver or kidney problems, are or plan to become pregnant, or are breastfeeding. for more information about side effects talk to your doctor. ♪ be in your moment. ask your doctor about ibrance. >> man: what's my safelite story? my truck...is my livelihood. so when my windshield cracked...
11:20 pm
the experts at safelite autoglass came right to me... with service i could trust. right, girl? >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ our clients come to us with complicated situations that occur in their lives. for them it's the biggest milestone, the biggest accomplishment, the sale of a business, or an important event for their family. for them, it's the first and only time. we have seen this literally thousands of times, in thousands of iterations. ♪ ♪ i am vince lumia, head of field management at morgan stanley. whether that's retirement, paying for their children's college education, or their son or daughter getting married, our financial advisors need to make sure that they are making objective decisions, every step along the way. every time you hit a milestone, an anniversary, a life event, the emotions will run high. making sure that you have somebody, a team of individuals that have seen it before, have seen every circumstance and seen every challenge,
11:21 pm
and have your back when you need it most, is one of the most valuable things a financial advisor could provide to a family. i am vince lumia and we are morgan stanley. ♪ ♪ ♪ (sha bop sha bop) ♪ ♪ are the stars out tonight? (sha bop sha bop) ♪ ♪ ♪ alexa, play our favorite song again. ok. ♪ i only have eyes for you ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ hey google. ♪ ♪ ♪
11:22 pm
♪ ♪ ♪ the committee investigating january 6th saying it will still go forward with criminal contempt proceedings against mark meadows despite his lawsuit. meadows now refusing to cooperate with the investigation despite having already turned over thousands of pages of documents. so joining me now is the chief white house correspondent for abc news, mr. jonathan karl, also the author of "betrayal: the final act of the trump show." such a pleasure to have you on. thank you so much, sir. >> great to be here.
11:23 pm
>> meadows fiercely pushing back against the committee after earlier having some level of cooperation. we know trump can't be happy with him or his new book. is he trying to get back in the former president's good graces? what is this all about? >> as a legal strategy it makes no sense what he was doing because, as you point out, he already turned over a lot of documents. he already said he was going to testify. he already, you know, turned over those emails, text messages, private emails, not just government emails and he was going to come in, and he would have been perfectly within his rights to attempt to assert privilege on any question or any specific documents that they wanted to get that he was not turning over, and then back and forth, he would not have been held in contempt. i'm sure there will would have been a lot of push and pull between the committee and meadows. now he is almost certainly going to be held in contempt by the full congress. by the way, don, not an
11:24 pm
insignificant thing. he will be the first former member of the house to be held in contempt by the house of representatives. that's quite an ignoble distinction for this guy who, you know, prides himself on being a former member of congress. so it makes no sense. the only explanation here is that donald trump is livid. he's livid at what happened when meadows' book came out, the way he was portrayed, the suggestion that he went into that debate covid positive, that he hid that information. now, keep in mind -- keep in mind. >> this is giving up this information for free. no one asked him. >> yeah, yeah, absolutely. look, meadows thought trump was going to love this book. he wasn't trying to dime out his boss here. >> but didn't trump support it at first until he actually found out what was in it? not that he read it, i'm not sure. but -- >> oh, my god, trump put out a
11:25 pm
statement, he said if you want to know the truth, read mark meadows' book, and it comes out and he's furious about what's inside the book. so you know, so meadows is trying to get in good graces with trump, so he's creating this blowup with the committee. he was in no jeopardy whatsoever. >> let me ask you about that because you mentioned that he's handed over thousands of documents to the committee, and in your book, you outline how meadows on new year's eve, he forwarded an email to mike pence's office about how pence could overturn the election. we know that mike shore, who is pence's aid is cooperating. how much do you think the committee has here? >> this is a critical document. he's forwarding a memo written by trump lawyer jenna ellis that outlines the whole scheme, the whole scheme for getting pence to reject the electoral votes from six different states, sending them back, putting a deadline. congress reconvenes on january 15th is the way this memo outlines it. they vote by congressional
11:26 pm
delegation, 26 congressional delegations are controlled by republicans. voila, trump wins re-election. i mean, it was a crazy, illegal scheme, but it was the plan. it was the plan for overturning the presidential election, and it was written by ellis, but it was forwarded to the vice president by mark meadow, and here's the thing, you raise a very important point. mark short is cooperating, we know, so it is almost certain that that email they have from mark short because, remember, there are two people on the email chain here. and this goes with a lot of other -- in my book i report that meadows was trying to reach out to brad raffensperger, the secretary of state in georgia, using his personal gmail account, and rafens berger was ignoring these message. he thought it was a prank. why would the white house chief of staff trying to reach out with him using the email. especially that whole thing with hillary clinton.
11:27 pm
>> emails and this private server, what gives here? >> it turns out it was really meadows so the committee has gone for the private accounts as well, and, you know, meadows has attempted to claim privilege, even as he turned over a lot of this stuff, he turned over a privilege log. these are the documents i'm not going to turn over because they are privileged. in a privilege log it shows the email, who it was sent to, who was cc'd, what was the subject line of the email is and when it was sent. so guess what, there are more than 200, nearly 300 people cooperating already with the committee. so they know to go to the other side of that email exchange. so meadows is already facing, i don't know, lots of exposure here, not testifying doesn't actually help him, doesn't protect him. >> let's put up jonathan's book again, jonathan karl's new book, and it is -- i just want to make sure i have the name right. "betrayal."
11:28 pm
jonathan karl, new information in that book, and you want to read it. always a pleasure to see you, come back soon. >> thank you, don. great to talk to you. voting rights completely stalled in congress as states make it harder and harder to make your vote count. tonight the former president barack obama's got something to say about that. >> this time they're going further. systematically undermining our democracy and making it harder for people to vote. nding machins and buying a car 100% online. now we've created a brand-new way for you to sell your car. whether it's a year old or a few years old. we wanna buy your car. so go to carvana and enter your license plate answer a few questions. and our techno wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds. when you're ready, we'll come to you, pay you on the spot and pick up your car, that's it. so ditch the old way of selling your car, and say hello to the new way at carvana.
11:29 pm
hi, my name is cherrie. i'm 76 and i live on the oregon coast. my husband, sam, we've been married 53 years. we love to walk on the beach. i have two daughters and then two granddaughters. i noticed that memories were not there like they were when i was much younger. since taking prevagen, my memory has gotten better and it's like the puzzle pieces have all been [click] put together. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.
11:30 pm
[microwave beeps] [ahh] ♪ ♪ ♪ i'm so defensive, i got bongos thumping in my chest ♪ ♪ and something tells me they don't beat for me ♪ ♪ i love romance, but i got eggshells around me ♪ ♪ don't step on 'em, don't step on 'em ♪ ♪ don't step on 'em, don't step on me ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ he'd better not take the ring from me ♪ this is the planning effect from fidelity. ben isn't worried about retirement because his plan is backed by the team at fidelity. a group of investment professionals manages ben's ira for him, analyzing market conditions and helping him stay on target. he gets one-on-one coaching when he wants some advice, and can adjust his plan whenever he needs to. and now he's so prepared for retirement,
11:31 pm
ben is feeling totally zen. that's the planning effect from fidelity. healthier is on-demand covid testing to help you return safely. even if it's still... a little awkward. how've you been? -i'm so good! ♪ this is what healthier looks like. ♪ small businesses like yours make gift-giving possible. now, comcast business has an exclusive gift for you. introducing the gift of savings sale.
11:32 pm
for a limited time, ask how to get a great deal for your business. and get up to a $500 prepaid card with select bundles when you switch to the network that can deliver gig speeds to the most businesses. or get started with internet and voice for $64.99 per month with a 2-year price guarantee. give your business the gift of savings today. comcast business. powering possibilities.
11:33 pm
the former president barack obama issuing a stark warning about the state of democracy tonight, and he is blaming it on republicans. listen to this. >> unfortunately we've got one party that actually doesn't want to see government work and get stuff done, and rather than argue based on their ideas, they're trying to tilt the playing field, and they're not even waiting for election day to do it. you know, their plan is to control state legislatures and congressional delegations before a single vote is cast. that's not how democracy is supposed to work. and our democracy is essential to who we are. it is what makes america exceptional and it shouldn't be a partisan issue. >> shouldn't be. the former president speaking at
11:34 pm
a virtual fundraiser if the national democratic redistricting committee. let's discuss now, civil rights attorney charles f. coleman jr. is here and senior cnn legal -- excuse me, political analyst ron brownstein, i almost gave you a new job there. thank you for joining us. the former president is essentially saying that income is in peril because republicans are rigging the system. what's your reaction? >> my reaction is it is bad form, in my opinion, to make this a partisan conversation, and the reason i say that is the minute you do that from a democratic standpoint, you walk into the conundrum of the following four words. where is the policy? you have a majority in the house that has passed the john lewis voting rights act, but you can't get it done in the senate, and so when you start talking about an administration that is currently more comfortable in terms of litigating their way around voting rights as opposed to legislating their way into voting rights, when make it a
11:35 pm
partisan issue it looks bad on your own party. while the rhetoric was correct, and i do think it's important to understand the gravity of what we're dealing with you walk yourself into a tenuous space because the question becomes what are you doing about when you have, you know, these legislators that aren't getting the job done. >> i want you to listen what the former president barack obama said about the extreme gerrymandering taking place across the country. here it is. >> if you want to win in a competitive district, candidates need to try and appeal to everybody, to put progress ahead of party. if you have tilted, skewed politically gerrymandered uncompetitive districts, that's going to attract candidates who are more extreme and only care about firing up their base, which means compromise becomes more difficult, which means a lot of voters simply get ignored. and that is bad for our democracy. >> so ron, you know, gerrymandering isn't exclusive
11:36 pm
to the gop. democrats have done it too, but they have also been far and away more supportive of independent commissions and fair maps. what's the reality check on this? >> well, the president, former president said is exactly right. you know, if you talk to the people who are following this most closely, my colleague david wasserman, they would argue that the biggest thing that's happening in redistricting is the decline of competitive districts, which has multiple impacts, one of which is if republicans can win a majority in 2022, they are creating so many safe republican seats, it may be difficult for democrats to win it back even if there is a backlash against that potential future republican congress. but the other impact is what the president, former president noted that you're going to have more districts in which particularly on the republican side it's going to be safe for more extreme members, you can imagine kind of trump inspired
11:37 pm
primary challenges in many of these districts being very formidable and casting -- having a huge influence on the way legislators behave, making them even more worried than they are now about potential primary challenges sponsored by trump. can i just say one thing on the first point, whether you want to acknowledge it or not, what we're talking about is a partisan dispute. i mean, these laws are passing in red states, making it tougher to vote. they are passing entirely on party line votes. what's happening in washington is that two democratic senators, joe manchin and kyrsten sinema are giving a veto to republicans in the senate on whether to countermand what's happening by republicans in the states are doing. and that contrast, as i've said before, very starkly to what happened in the years after the civil war when the lincoln era republicans passed the 14th and 15th amendments and all of the other post-civil war civil
11:38 pm
rights bills because they knew the democratic party of that era could not be a partner in safeguarding those national rights and that's what has broken down that manchin and sinema at this point are still giving a veto to republicans who are unlikely to step in against what their fellows in the party are doing in the states. >> it is really -- it is so sad. charles, the doj is suing texas alleging that the republican-led state violated the voting rights act by drawing districts that discriminated against minorities. do you think the doj needs to be more aggressive in challenging these attempts to disenfranchise voters? >> i think they do. i think they are doing a good job, and kristen clark doing the civil rights division over there, the doj is doing a spectacular job in terms of that litigation and its agenda. i understand that since we have seen shelby versus holder break down basically the vra to nothing almost and section six was completely gutted where preclearance was taken out, there aren't many tools that the doj has to use.
11:39 pm
what they're doing is they're relying on section two, which is the remaining sort of standing section that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, on the basis of, you know, race or ethnic background, they're using section two as their conduit to get to where they need to go. i don't know how successful it's going to be because there are a number of different ways that they have to establish that it actually has had this result. and that remains to be seen from the supreme court. but until we sort of have a definitive guideline, these are the weapons that you have and you have to use them. i do think it's important that they keep the foot on the gas, keep pressing and keep filing these cases in different districts. >> charles, ron, gentlemen, i'll see you both soon. are you fully vaccinated if you've gotten two shots or three? lots of new information and mixed messages coming out about that. and we're going to make sense of all of it for you. that is next.
11:40 pm
11:41 pm
(vo) subaru and our retailers believe in giving back. that's why, in difficult times, we provided
11:42 pm
one hundred and fifty million meals to feeding america. and now through the subaru share the love event, we're helping even more. by the end of this year, subaru will have donated over two hundred and twenty five million dollars to charity. this is what it means to be more than a car company. this is what it means to be subaru. every day in business brings something new. so get the flexibility of the new mobile service designed for your small business.
11:43 pm
introducing comcast business mobile. you get the most reliable network with nationwide 5g included. and you can get unlimited data for just $30 per line per month when you get four lines or mix and match data options. available now for comcast business internet customers with no line-activation fees or term contract required. see if you can save by switching today. comcast business. powering possibilities.
11:44 pm
pfizer saying today a third dose of their covid vaccine produces a robust antibody response in omicron. they say studies found that two doses would provide some protection from severe disease, but they note there is a substantial drop in antibodies. this as the cdc is saying that a quarter of adults who have already been vaccinated are now also boosted. so joining me now is dr. richard besser, former acting director of the cdc. we're so happy to have you on, doctor, thanks so much. what's your reaction to this news from pfizer? are we in good shape with our current vaccines? >> it is positive news. i always like to see confirmation by having scientists independent of the company look at the data. it is encouraging that a third dose increases the antibody response. it's not clear to me yet that that's something that's really
11:45 pm
going to be necessary. when you think about the immune response that we have, it's a pretty incredible thing. one piece of it is the antibodies that they're measuring in the blood. the other piece of it is call cellular immunity, and that's done by your b cells and your t cells, and those are designed to be able to protect you from viruses that look like viruses you've seen before. it may be that even with a lower level of antibodies, your body once it sees the omicron variant will kick up, generate antibodies and use the other forms of your immune response to knock this down. and that may be why we're seeing less severe disease, at least the initial reports are less severe disease out of africa and south africa where they've been seeing more of the omicron. >> dr. besser, currently the cdc is only recommending booster shots for everyone 18 and older. so what does this news mean, this pfizer news mean for kids? are they still protected against the omicron variant with the regular two-dose regimen?
11:46 pm
>> i think it's going to be some time before we have more data on children, but i would encourage everyone who is currently recommended to get a booster to do so. you know, right now we are still losing more than a thousand people a day, a thousand people a day dying from covid, and it's not from omicron. it's from the delta variant, and it's important that people get vaccinated, and even more importantly than people getting boosted is reaching out to anyone you know who hasn't been vaccinated at all because the vast majority of people who are dying from covid in this country are people who haven't received any vaccines. that's true around the globe as well. 90% of people in africa have not had access to any vaccines at all, and that's something that has to change. >> only a quarter of adults who are already vaccinated are boosted. that's, you know, 49 million people. there's a long way to go. how do we get these numbers up? >> well, you know, i think we do
11:47 pm
it a number of ways. we reach out to people, we explain, we're transparent about information. we share what we know in terms of the value of boosters. clearly for people who are older, for people over 65, these are reducing hospitalizations, they're reducing deaths. for people who are younger than that, it's reducing overall infections, and that's a good thing too, but we have to recognize that some people will take time on this, will take time to make their decisions, and we have to create space for that. the more we can do to get people who aren't vaccinated at all, and that's about 30% of people in this country, to get them to get vaccinated, that will take us the furthest on this. >> dr. fauci is saying today that the definition of fully vaccinated at some point will change to three doses. currently we have to, you know, wait six months after our second shot to get that booster shot. if the definition of fully vaccinated is going to change, will the vaccine schedule change as well? >> i don't think the schedule will change. you know, i'm a pediatrician, and you know, as we've learned more about childhood
11:48 pm
vaccination, what it means to be fully vaccinated has changed. when i first trained people only got one measles vaccine at age 1, and then over time we recognized they needed another one at age 4 to age 6. that may be the case with covid that over time we learn what it truly means to be vaccinated to be fully protected. and i wouldn't be surprised at all if over time that includes not just the primary series, those first two doses, but a later dose as well. >> doctor, you know, this news from pfizer seems positive, but people are anxious as we're approaching christmas and new year's. this is a recent "axios" poll and it shows one in four americans are likely to change their travel plans due to omicron variant, and one in three will stop dining indoors. do you think this is the right move? are these the right moves? >> yeah, you know, when it comes to behavior, a lot has to do with your own individual risk. are you someone who is at
11:49 pm
greater risk for severe infection? is there someone in your family who can't be vaccinated because they're too young? and what's your tolerance for risk, and you want to weigh those things, and if you -- if it comes down that traveling will be emotionally stressful because you're concerned about omicron, then this may be a year that you hold back on that travel. if you're someone who's at greater risk and you want to have more information and it may be a year where you hold back on travel. our family, we're traveling. we're lower risk and we feel comfortable. but i fully understand people who are thinking about changing their plans or at least making sure they're flexible in case they need to change at the last minute. >> thank you, be well. appreciate it. >> thanks very much. so james brown said the cia spied on him, and when cnn tried to get information on the accusation, take this, they wouldn't answer. ♪ watch me, watch me ♪ ♪ i got it, watch me ♪ ♪ i got it, yay ♪
11:50 pm
rob did his best to manage his constipation with belly pain day after day. but after realizing it was ibs-c, he found another way. and finally said yess to adding linzess. linzess is not a laxative. it helps you have more frequent and complete bowel movements, and is proven to help relieve overall abdominal symptoms belly pain, discomfort, and bloating. do not give linzess to children less than two. it may harm them. do not take linzess if you have a bowel blockage. get immediate help if you develop unusual or severe stomach pain. especially with bloody or black stools. the most common side effect is diarrhea, sometimes severe. if it's severe, stop taking linzess and call your doctor right away.
11:51 pm
other side effects include gas, stomach area pain, and swelling. could your story also be about ibs-c? talk to your doctor and say yess to linzess. learn how abbvie and ironwood could help you save on linzess. it's the season of smiling. and at aspen dental, we make it easy to gift yourself the smile you deserve. new patients, start today with a full exam and x-rays, with no obligation. if you don't have insurance, it's free. plus everyone saves 20% on their treatment plan with flexible payment solutions for every budget. we're here making smiles shine bright so you can start the new year feelin' alright. call 1-800-aspendental or book today at aspendental.com are you one of the millions of americans who experience occasional bloating, gas or abdominal discomfort? taking align every day can help. align contains a quality probiotic developed by gastroenterologists. it adds more good bacteria to your gut to naturally help soothe your occasional bloating, gas and abdominal discomfort. support your digestive health with align,
11:52 pm
the #1 doctor recommended probiotic. try align today. and try new align fast acting biotic gummies. helps soothe occasional digestive upsets in as little as 7 days. is struggling to manage your type 2 diabetes knocking you out of your zone? lowering your a1c with once-weekly ozempic® can help you get back in it. oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! my zone... lowering my a1c, cv risk, and losing some weight... now, back to the game! ozempic® is proven to lower a1c. most people who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. and you may lose weight. adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. in adults also with known heart disease, ozempic® lowers the risk
11:53 pm
of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. ozempic® helped me get back in my type 2 diabetes zone. ozempic® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. don't share needles or pens, or reuse needles. don't take ozempic® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. stop ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase low blood sugar risk. side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. looking to get back in your type 2 diabetes zone? ask your health care provider today about once-weekly ozempic®. oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! you may pay as little as $25 for a 3-month prescription.
11:54 pm
the legendary god father of soul, was known as the hardest working man in showbiz. but was he also spied on for years by the cia? 15 years after brown's death, the cia, well, it still isn't saying. ♪ i feel good, like i knew that i would, y'all ♪ ♪ i feel good ♪ ♪ i knew that i would ♪ >> oh, man, i miss that kind of performer. i miss james brown. no one could light up a stage like him. he long claimed that the cia monitored his movements, going back to the late '60s.
11:55 pm
in a home which are published in 2005, he wrote that government agencies were concerned about the rise of the black power movement and the role of prominent entertainers like himself. in august of 1968, for example, a few movnlts few months after r king's assassination, brown released, "say it loud, i am proud." so did that song result in the cia spying on brown? cnn looked for the answer here. earlier this year, this network sued the cia under the freedom of information act, trying to get any files that it has on the god father of soul. the agency is not allowed to spy domestically on americans, so if it did, that's important information. cnn's lawsuit is in the courts, and a judge is expected to make a ruling sometime in 2022.
11:56 pm
but here's what i can report, okay? and keeping with this long standing practice, the cia refuses to confirm or deny that it has any records on james brown. but says disclosing whether it has records on him could, and i quote here, cause serious damage to u.s. national security. things that make you go, hmm. up next, he is suing nancy pelosi and the entire january 6 committee. what does mark meadows not want you to know? goals. and since she's got goals, she might need help reaching them, and so she'll get some help from fidelity, and at fidelity, someone will help her create a plan for all her goals, which means suzie will be feeling so good about that plan, she can just enjoy right now. that's the planning effect, from fidelity.
11:57 pm
it's our holiday savings event on the sleep number 360 smart bed. what if i sleep hot? ...or cold? no problem, the sleep number 360 smart bed is temperature balancing so you both sleep just right. and it senses your movements and automatically adjusts to keep you both effortlessly comfortable. so, you can really promise better sleep? yes! you'll know exactly how well you slept, night after night. we take care of the science. all you have to do is sleep. and now, save up to $500 on select sleep number 360 smart beds. plus, 0% interest for 48 months. only for a limited time. to learn more, go to sleepnumber.com
11:58 pm
(man) so when in doubt, just say, "let me talk to my manager." next, carvana's 100% online shopping experience. oh, man. carvana lets people buy a car-- get this-- from their couch. oh, how disruptive. no salesman there to help me pick out the car i need. how does anyone find a car on this site without someone like us checking in? she's a beauty, huh? oh, golly! (laughter) i can help you find the color you want. that sounds nice. let me talk to my manager. (vo) buy your next car 100% online. with carvana.
11:59 pm
financial planning is finding your home away from home. ♪♪ and, it's designing a plan to help get you there. start a relationship with citi and earn a cash bonus when you open a new eligible account and complete required activities. wealth management is planning your path together.
12:00 am
and, it's guiding you along the way. start a relationship with citi and earn a cash bonus when you open a new eligible account and complete required activities. tonight, mark meadows, a former white house chief of staff, suing the january 6 committee and speaker nancy pelosi, seeking to block enforcement of the subpoenas issued to him and for his phone records. that as the committee appears read

91 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on