tv Don Lemon Tonight CNN January 5, 2022 12:00am-1:00am PST
a modern approach to wealth management. moving is a handful. no kidding! fortunately, xfinity makes moving easy. easy? -easy? switch your xfinity services to your new address online in about a minute. that was easy. i know, right? and even save with special offers just for movers. really? yep! so while you handle that, you can keep your internet and all those shows you love, and save money while you're at it with special offers just for movers
we have breaking news tonight on the investigation into the january 6th attack on the capitol. the house select committee sending a letter to fox host sean hannity, requesting his voluntary cooperation, saying it has dozens of text messages with the trump white house indicating that he had, quote, advance knowledge regarding trump and his legal team's planning for january 6th. and more breaking news. the committee saying it also wants to hear directly but voluntarily from former vice president mike pence on what he witnessed during the insurrection. also tonight, senator joe manchin signaling he might be open to some changes in the filibuster. will there be possible movement on voting rights legislation? we'll talk about all of that this evening. i want to get straight to cnn's senior legal analyst elie honig and also laura coates. lau good evening to both of you. elie, i'm going to start with you.
this text from hannity on january 5th says it all right here. i am very worried about the next 48 hours. what do you think hannity knows? >> well, don, what's clear from these texts is sean hannity was right in the mix here. he was serving as an adviser, as an interested party, as a cheerleader really for the president and his administration. and i think it makes perfect sense that the committee wants to ask sean hannity just that question. what did you miean by this text? who did you speak to before this text? what did you do after? one interesting thing the committee does in its letter to sean hannity, is they show him, we have the receipts. we have dozens of texts you're in, and they quote him to sean hannity. they make very clear why they are and should be interested in talking to him. >> laura, hannity texted this to mark meadows on december 31st, and i quote. we can't lose the entire white house counsel's office. i do not see january 6th happening the way he is being told. after the 6th, he should
announce, we'll leave the nationwide effort to reform voting integrity. go to florida and watch joe mess up daily. stay engaged. when he speaks, people will listen. this seems to suggest that january 6th wasn't unexpected after all. but i want to unpack this text with you because he's acting, it seems as an adviser here, right? is the committee correct that the hannity is indeed a fact witness who they need to hear from? >> absolutely. let's unpack it a little bit, don. first of all, he's essentially saying that in advance of the actual january 6th occurrence, he has some information about how the president was briefed on how it might go. the idea of laying out some sort of strategy or thinking about how this might actually come to fruition. that's advance notice, number one. number two is the discussion about how he's essentially conceded that president trump lost to the incoming president, joe biden, now the current president of the united states. so he's saying, listen, the jig
is up essentially. go to florida because you have influence there to then talk about voting reform. talking about a concession at that point in time. but also you have the very real statement about the notion of, listen, if sean hannity had advance notice, if he's having a communication with mark meadows or anybody else at this point in time, it shows you that there was some basis for them to know that maybe not everything was going to happen, but that january 6th was a planned event, not something that had a spontaneous notion to it. that's very important for the select committee to talk about here because it's being prefaced and the narrative is that, oh, people just showed up on the lawn. it happened to happen. finally the point about the white house counsel. remember there was a plan in place, a now infamous memo outlining how you could essentially rely on one person in the justice department to try to overturn the election, to try to give advice and counsel of how to do it. he, himself, did not see that as a viable, let alone a moral or
ethical plan, but a viable plan of action. all this is corroborative of what we've already learned from this committee. >> elie, the committee hasn't subpoenaed hannity. they just asked for him to talk voluntarily. do you think there's any chance that he's going to cooperate with this, at least voluntarily? >> no, i don't, don, and i thought it was really interesting in your prior segment with representative jamie raskin. you asked him, what will you do? what will the committee do if sean hannity does not comply? and representative raskin said, well, we have a panoply of options. i know he can't commit at this point. but he doesn't really have a panoply. he has two options. one, if hannity defies this request is let him go. that's it. two is subpoena him. there's really no complexity about it. so the committee's going to have to decide, are they going to serve these informal requests and follow them up with subpoenas, or if empeople say, , thank you, then go on your way. >> hannity's attorney jay
sekulow telling cnn they are reviewing the letter and will respond as appropriate. do you expect hannity is going to try to use the first amendment as a defense even though hannity, himself, said he is not a journalist. and you heard jamie raskin saying we're not asking for notes or who his sources are. we're asking as if -- you saw the analogy. he said, you know, if you witness a car crash, right? that's what he wants to know. you're still a witness. >> yeah. i think sean hannity and his attorney will certainly hide behind the first amendment, but there's a distinction there. i think representative raskin made the perfect example, don. if you witness a crime on your way to work, you're a witness, right? no one's going to ask you about your sources or your reporting or your personal opinions. the committee goes out of its way in this letter. they're cognizant of that. they say, mr. hannity, we're not going to ask you about your reporting methodology, about your sources, about your personal beliefs. you're just a witness. you're like somebody who witnessed a robbery or a car crash. they will try to cloak themselves in the first amendment, but i really think
it's misdirection. >> the committee wants to speak with the former vice president, mike pence. we know that top aides on pence's team are already cooperating. i mean how should the committee approach this elie? >> well, you know, you want to get your base of information from the advisers, from the people who were around mike pence. if i'm on the committee and i can get mike pence to talk, you bet i want that opportunity. and, again, yes, he was the vice president of the united states. but in this case, he also is a fact witness. i don't know that he's entitled to any greater treatment. now, i do think it's unlikely mike pence voluntarily speaks to the committee although i can see a middle path here where they work out some specific topics that mike pence might be willing to talk to them about. i think it's unlikely they'd go so far as to subpoena him, though. >> i want you to weigh in on this, laura, because pence is such a key figure in all of this. if you were on the committee, what would you ask him?
>> i'd be champing at the bit to ask him. one reason is of course i'm wondering if his defiance that he held on to the day they were supposed to certify the election will actually carry through here. remember one of the things that's so unexpected and so shocking is just how fragile our democracy was, that it came down to one person, the vice president's decision to essentially hold the democratic line while members of the police force and the capitol police were holding the physical line outside. many were shocked to find that he was the only person who refused to defy or refused to go along with the actual campaign, the big lie campaign of the former president, donald trump. and so i would want to know if he was at a complete departure from that essential party line there. i would also look at him and ask the questions about who did he call? did he try to reach out to the president of the united states, the person to whom he is second in command? when he reached out, was he rebuffed? was there an actual conversation? now, of course, the discussion
between himself and trump would more likely be privileged than anything else. but remember here, if he tried to reach out to other people who were not the president, if he was thwarted in some way, was he denied? how did he learn about this? what were his concerns? were other people trying to contact him in lieu of the president, being unable to reach him? all of that is fodder for trying to understand what other members of congress were looking to, what people who were not having direct contact with the president of the united states. on the idea of the subpoenas, we've already seen that people among his own team have been more likely to be compliant because there has been this great divide, as you've seen, from trump and beyond. but i'm most interested in the person for whom gallows were constructed. what is his actual take, not the political diatribe or the talking points or talking about they'll never see eye to eye? when you attempted to speak mouth to ear that day, what did you learn? that is fact-based, and we need
to know about it because, remember, if he had been attacked in some way, if they had, god forbid, actually found the vice president of the united states or the speaker of the house, you're talking about the presidential succession line. that's very important to our democracy to know just how fragile it was, which is why i ultimately think the supreme court should yield the conclusion of in this cost-benefit analysis of whether to be transparent and have records be forthcoming, or to honor a prior president's claim of privilege, which is nonexistent, they have to lend themselves towards transparency, and vice president pence's testimony could be the very conduit they need. >> that's what you think. you know what i think, laura? i think you're the only other person that i've heard -- some other people -- who use the term "champing at the bit" correctly. that is my pet peeve when people say chomping at the bit. i'm like, it's not chomping. it's champing. thank you for getting it right. >> and i don't even ride horses.
thank you so much. you're welcome. you know what? a little google goes a long way in this thing that we call the lexicon of the english language. thank you. >> thank you. >> thanks, don. >> joining me now, political analysts ron brownstein and kirsten powers and stuart stevens. they always have perfect grammar. good evening to all of you. stuart, let's start with you, and let's start with the hannity texts and the committee wanting more information from him. this is what he was saying behind the scenes, not to his audience, that whole time. what do you think of this? >> look, i think the problem we have is that we fall back on thinking about this under the way that our sort of political societal structure has existed before, which isn't the right one. hannity's not a journalist. fox is not a news outlet.
fox are prop gandists. the history of how this works is pretty clear. you can look at germany. you can look at hungary. you can look at venezuela. it is a pattern here, and we have to just accept that the republican party is an authorityian force. it has financiers, and it has prop gandists. and the prop gandists are formed by fox. it's that simple. he's not a ron brownstein here. >> so fox is an arm of the republican party. it's basically they use fox -- the republican party uses fox to push out their propaganda. >> yeah. he's not a white house staffer, but he's more important than 99% of the white house staffers. >> yeah. ron, what did you want to say? >> no, i agree. i think that it's not exactly an arm of the republican party in the sense it has independent agency itself, but it is kind of a force in the conservative movement that isolates its
viewers in kind of, you know, an artificial world. and the success -- the overwhelming numbers of republicans who believe, despite no evidence, that biden was elected only because of massive fraud, three-quarters and polling a year later after every court in the country laughed out the supposed evidence is testimony to how powerful this is. and it really does create kind of a nation within a nation and an enormous centrifugal pressure on republican elected officials to avoid cooperating with a democratic president on pretty much anything. so, you know, it's not only a subservient kind of, you know, arm of the party. it drives kind of a conservative movement agenda to some extent on the party. either way, it is just an enormous force for polarization of american society. >> kirsten powers is sitting here going, look, guys, you
know. you guys are sitting here guy-splaining everything. you'r you worked there oftentimes with sean hannity. you were on his show. what is your read on him having such a close relationship with the white house, with the administration, to be saying things like this, i mean, pretty much behind trump's back, saying one thing on text messages behind trump's back and another thing on television. are you even at all surprised by this? talk to us. >> well, at this point i'm not surprised. i mean it's obviously a very different place than when i left there, i think, five years ago. so i don't think that this kind of -- these kinds of things would have been so accepted. i don't even think anybody over there seems to care about this. the language he was using even in these text messages, the "we," right, like they're all part of the same thing. there isn't even -- they're not even pretending that there's any
kind of distance between them. now, hannity has said before he doesn't consider himself a journalist. he's a talk show host. so i don't know how he's now playing a journalist, invoking the first amendment even though they're not -- they're not going after sources and methods here. that's not really what's going on. this is not in any way -- doesn't really have anything to do with him being a journalist or a talk show host frankly. it has to do with what did you know leading up to january 6th? and it looks like you knew a lot. and that -- you know, even if he was a journalist, that wouldn't protect him in this situation because, again, it's not trying to reveal sources and methods or anything like that. it's just trying to understand, what did you know about what the president was expecting to happen, wanted to happen, and what he was thinking about it? >> so you don't think this would have happened pre-trump over at the fox propaganda network? >> i have vague memories of people getting in trouble.
>> he was onstage at a campaign rally. they called him up and sean -- >> no, this is pre-trump, and he got in trouble for it. i do think there is a difference. i will say also the arm of the republican party -- i actually think it works in the other direction. i think they have much more power over the republican party than the republican party has over them. so they drive everything that's happening. even if we look at what's happening in terms of voter fraud, how supposedly, you know, democrats stole the election, well, that story that fox news has been pushing for as long as i can remember. so all of these seeds are planted and pushed out through fox news through what they call their entertainment hosts, and that would be hannity would be an example of that. "fox & friends," they consider that an entertainment show. so that's how they kind of play
the game. but it has gone to a completely different level, i think, in its current iteration. >> one more question. do you think that -- do you remember the text messages came out before i think it was laura -- what's her name? laura ingraham and sean hannity. there was a whole thing about text messages before, and then this. have they been exposed as actors because they're always -- they get so pearl clutching about what happens on the so-called liberal media, which they consider liberal media anybody other than them. you have them actually trying to influence what happens at the white house. there's receipts of it, and then now they want to be -- you know, they want them to come and talk about an investigation. have they been exposed as the actors and the frauds that they are? >> i -- i mean i guess there are people out there who believe that they're sort of on the up and up. that's really hard for me to
believe. but i guess for those people who were believing they were on the up and up, they've been exposed, though those people will probably never hear about it. that's the thing. they live in an alternate universe where all they know is what sean hannity tells hem and what laura ingraham tells them. they've shown their willingness to do one thing behind the scenes and then turn around and go on tv and say something completely opposite to that if it's going to keep them in good stead with their viewers and if it's going to please you know who, donald trump. >> okay. hold your thoughts. we have another -- i'm going to keep you guys over the break. the committee wants to talk to the former vice president mike pence as well. so we'll hear from ron, kirsten, and stuart right after this break. we'll be right back. simply add finish jetdry 3in1 to rinse, dry and shine your dishes. solve 3 problems at once with finish jetdry 3in1.
even frozen fruit, and make a smoothie any time, anywhere. blendjet cleans itself. just add a drop of soap, water, and blend. recharge quickly with any usb port. order now on blendjet.com and get our best deal ever! finally getting there...is the best! but with febreze freshness in your car... ...driving there is pretty darn good too. enjoy 30 days of freshness with febreze car. ♪ la, la, la, la, la ♪ back with me now, ron brownstein, kirsten powers, and stuart stevens. stuart, before we get to the
vice president, do you actually think this is good for sean hannity? >> i think it's great for sean hannity. his speaking fees will go up. he wants to be a martyr and a leader of an authoritarian movement. what better proof than someone who's so close to the president of the united states, he's helping direct events on 1/6. >> wow. >> he has an inside channel. look, this is a dream come true for sean hannity, which doesn't mean they shouldn't subpoena him. of course they should. >> not good for democracy. ron, what did you want to say? >> i think this really shows what democrats are up against in this momentous choice they face in the next few weeks on whether to roll back the filibuster to pass voting rights legislation. you know, the last time the senate reauthorized the voting rights act, republicans were in control of the senate and it passed 98-0. but you see in a fox world how difficult it is to get republicans to kind of cross the
line that fox is laying out there, as we were talking about, that there's this systemic fraud rotting american elections for years. when they brought up the voting rights act, forget the broader democratic election bill. when they brought up just the voting rights act a few weeks ago, only one republican even voted to -- lisa murkowski -- voted to open the debate. i think what this says to joe manchin and kyrsten sinema is what they're asking for is completely unrealistic in this world. the idea that there will be large numbers of republicans willing to kind of step across this very deep channel that fox and all the other conservative media has created to support any effort to shore up voting rights. it's just unrealistic. so the choice they're going to face in a couple weeks on martin luther king day or around then is do they act alone or not act because i think what we're seeing is why it's so hard to get any meaningful number of republicans to resist what trump and fox and others are doing.
>> i think we know the answer, and that will probably be to not act. stuart, now to the vice president. the committee -- the chair of the committee also saying that he wants to hear directly from the former vice president, mike pence. pence has been slowly distancing himself from the big lie. we don't have to play the sound bite. we know. so what do you think? has he distanced himself enough to cooperate with this committee? >> i doubt he will. look, i resist this idea that we're going to praise vice president pence because he actually didn't go along with overthrowing the government of the united states and ending peaceful transition of power. that's a pretty low bar. i mean pence saw all of this. if you go back and read all these books about what happened post-election, i mean pence was like calling up dan quayle saying, like, isn't there a way i can do this? pence is no hero here. i mean he's someone who stood for his entire life for this
whole idea of morality, someone who went on the radio station and ranted against adultery, and then he teamed up with donald trump. i can't think of a more perfect phony in american politics than mike pence. >> nobody has said that. i've been waiting for someone to say that now for five years. this guy ran on -- he was such the perfect, oh, adultery and family and anti-gay and all of this, and then he ran with like the guy who, you know, had the affair with a porn star and have you. i've got to run, but i'm going to give kirsten the last thought here. go ahead, kirsten. >> on what? >> whatever you would like to say. that's dangerous, i know. >> yeah. i know, yeah. >> do you think pence -- pence is not going to cooperate, though, right? >> i don't think so. the truth is he doesn't really
have much to lose. he doesn't have a bright future basically because of him not going in 1,000% with the whole plan. so this would be a good opportunity for him to do the right thing, but i don't think that we should expect that to happen. and i agree, you know, we shouldn't be lowering the bar for people that if they just do the minute mally decent thing, that we somehow treat them as heroes. >> we're so happy that you're here at cnn, kirsten powers. >> i am too. >> instead of at that other place. you are probably much happier for it. >> yes. >> i was waiting for the yes. thank you all. have a good evening. i appreciate it. i'll see you soon. happy new year to you. the senate majority leader chuck schumer wants to get voti rights passed. we'll talk to congressman james clyburn. we'll ask him what he thinks after this.
in a 21 month study, scientists proved that rid- x reduces up to 20% of waste build up every month. take the pressure off with rid-x. are you one of the millions of americans who experience occasional bloating, gas, or abdominal discomfort? taking align can help. align contains a quality probiotic to naturally help soothe digestive upsets 24/7. try align, the pros in digestive health. ♪ for skin that never holds you back. don't settle for silver. #1 for diabetic dry skin #1 for psoriasis symptom relief and #1 for eczema symptom relief. gold bond. champion your skin.
so i called the barnes firm. i was hit by a car and needed help. i called the barnes firm, that was the best call i could've made. i'm rich barnes. it's hard for people to know how much their accident case is worth. let our injury attorneys help you get the best result possible. ♪ the barnes firm injury attorneys ♪ ♪ call one eight hundred, eight million ♪ tonight senator joe manchin hinting he might be open to some changes in the filibuster, but how that might ultimately impact the passage of voting rights legislation is really unclear at the moment. the senate majority whip dick durbin today saying that democrats are turning up their focus on voting rights now that the build back better plan is on the back burner for the moment.
a lot to discuss with representative james clyburn, democrat of south carolina, who is the house majority whip. thank you, sir, for joining. >> thanks for having me. >> let's talk about senator manchin saying he doesn't want to make any changes that would divide the country further. this is what he said this morning. watch this. >> i think these are things republicans and democrats both could and should agree on. so we want to talk to everybody. i want to engage everybody. i'm just not doing it from one side. i think that for us to go it alone, no matter what side does it, it ends up coming back at you pretty hard. >> so he says his absolute preference is not to change the rules unless there's republican buy-in. isn't that completely out of touch with where the senate gop actually is? they've been repeatedly blocking democrats' attempts to pass voting bills. >> that's quite true. the fact of the matter is that's my preference as well. that was our preference years ago when we got 100% of
republicans voted in favor of reauthorizing the voting rights act. now we have no republicans in favor of reauthorizing. so if they can make a shift in their position, maybe it's time to make a shift in ours. now, i don't understand why senator manchin feels that we ought to hold on to the position we had when they have changed their position. so when we're all together and we're doing this irrespective of party and talking about voting as being an american issue to maintain this democracy, then we're all together. that is my preference. he's talking about what should be, and, yes, i agree. that's what should be. but that is not what is. so we have to govern ourselves accordingly. >> this is -- he's also proposing rather than requiring
60 votes to overcome the filibuster, he's open to making it three-fifths of those present, meaning if there are absences, that the threshold would be reduced. would that be an acceptable compromise? >> i don't think so. i think that we ought to just decide that voting and other constitutional issues ought not be subjected to the filibuster. that's just the way it ought to be. we do it for the budget. we do this reconciliation process so that no one person can filibuster the full faith and credit of the united states of america, and the same should apply when it comes to constitutional issues. >> yeah. >> so i think that nibbling around the edges, that's not the thing to do. if the republicans are not going to be supportive of everybody having an unfettered vote, then
let's move on without them. >> what about -- you know, a lot of people have been talking about this, the so-called talking filibuster which some have proposed. the president mentioned it in an interview with me a couple times. if senator manchin would support that, would that be substantive in terms of on voting rights? >> well, you know, it all depends how you write the rules. if you say that one person has to keep the floor, that's one thing. if you say that one person can hand the floor off to another person and they keep doing that and get up to 50-some-odd people, that's another thing. so if you're going to modify the filibuster, go back to what it used to be, that would not be anything new. strom thurmond broke the record back in 1957, it was a talking filibuster. so if you go back to the talking filibuster, that's one thing. but how would the rules be
written so as to make voting unencumbered? >> speaking of, do you think there is value in the filibuster to preserve the rights of the minority, or do you believe when the tables are turned and the republicans are in power, that they will just get rid of it anyway, and so democrats should act now specifically for voting rights? >> i mean, both those things are true. there is value in the filibuster, but it should be limited. it should not be unlimited. what we've got now is a person sitting downtown somewhere in a spa making a phone call, and the filibuster's on. the person doesn't have to do a thing about it. now, if we're talking about giving time for a person to muster support for his or her position, to explain to people why he or she feels the way he
or she feels, that's one thing. but if it's just unlimited, and you can hold it up forever, which is what the case is now, that, to me, i am not in favor of. >> yeah. congressman clyburn, thank you so much. i appreciate your time. again, happy new year to you. >> same to you, and thank you so much for having me. so facts first. the attack on the capitol was just that, an attack. but despite the evidence, the pictures, the video, the lies just keep on spreading. our very own daniel dale is here to tell us the truth, and he's next. nothing kills more viruses, including the covid-19 virus, on more surfaces than lysol disinfectant spray. lysol. what it takes to protect.
it's epiq here. it's epiq here. it's epiq out here, too. introducing the epson epiq vision mini projector. so epic, so mini. the top-rated epson epic vision mini is the new immersive way to enjoy your favorite content. like streaming movies, tv shows, sports, workout classes, and even gaming, wherever you like. the picture is so big. up to 150 inches. that's 4x bigger than a 75-inch flat panel. go online or call to get over $200 in added value. stream your favorite shows from services like hulu, hbomax, and youtube, right out of the box. its 3 chip, 3lcd laser technology produces outstanding color and brightness. order an epiq vision mini and get this exclusive tv offer. a free travel case, free 3-year limited warranty, free shipping, and a moneyback guarantee. that's over $200 in added value. it's epic. it's mini. it's the epson epiq vision mini. the epson epiq vision mini. visit buyepiqvision.com, or call today. bigger and
neuriva. think bigger. blendjet's holiday sale is on now for the #1 gift this holiday season, the blendjet 2 portable blender. it packs the power of a big blender on the go, and it crushes right through ice. just drop in your favorite ingredients, even frozen fruit, and make a smoothie any time, anywhere. blendjet cleans itself. just add a drop of soap, water, and blend. recharge quickly with any usb port. order now on blendjet.com and get our best deal ever!
♪ i'm chi lan, i am a mom, and a real estate agent. after having a kid, everything that you used to do for yourself goes out the window. the lines that i was seeing in my forehead were getting deeper than i was used to them being. and i realized, you know, what i can focus again on myself. so, what do you see when you look at yourself? i see someone who is growing and changing, who loves and is loved. botox® cosmetic is fda approved to temporarily make frown lines, crow's feet and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign of a life-threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain, headache, eyebrow, eyelid drooping, and eyelid swelling. tell your doctor about your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications including botulinum toxins as these may increase the risk of serious side effects
see for yourself at botoxcosmetic.com nearly one year since the january 6th attack, and some americans are still pushing lies about the deadly insurrection. we're going to knock them down tonight. as we like to say, facts first here. i want to bring in daniel dale, cnn's fact checker in chief. thank you so much for joining. let's get right to it. one of the biggest false claims from trump and others is that all the rioters at the capitol that day were unarmed. give us the facts. >> that's not even close to true, don. we heard it again from former president trump in december. dozens of rioters at the capitol that day were armed. in fact, so far, according to the department of justice last week, more than 75 people who illegally entered capitol grounds have been charged to date with entering with a deadly
or dangerous weapon. that includes at least four people accused of bringing guns on capitol grounds, and that includes things like knives, like batons, like tasers, baseball bats, axes. the list goes on and on. whether you're using arms to refer specifically to guns or more broadly talking about weapons, the claim is completely and utterly inaccurate. >> another lie that some supporters of the former president love to spread is that the insurrection was a false flag. can you tell us about that? >> yeah. this claim is so completely nonsense, it's almost an insult to americans' intelligence. we know for a fact that this insurrection was orchestrated and perpetrated by supporters of former president trump. not only did we see them and hear them that day, the fact that they support trump has been exhaustively confirmed in their own social media posts, in their own comments to media outlets, and in their own admissions in
court. this was not some attack secretly orchestrated by, say, left wing antifa to make president trump look bad. trump keeps saying maybe it was antifa. we have more than 700 people charged to date. of those more than 700 people, not a single one has been shown to be a member of left-wing antifa. in contrast, hundreds and hundreds have been proven to be trump supporters, and a number of them have been confirmed to be affiliated with right-wing extremist groups like the proud boys and the oath keepers. so, no, this is not a false flag. yes, as we all knew from the start, this was in fact perpetrated by supporters of trump. >> facts first. daniel dale, thank you so much. i appreciate it. 1 in 5 hospitals reporting their icu beds are nearly all full. doctors and nurses sounding the alarm again. stay with us. full prescription-strength? reduces inflammation? thank the gods. don't thank them too soon. kick pain in the aspercreme. - i've said it before and i'll say it again.
if i thought a reverse mortgage was just some kind of trick to take your home, i wouldn't even be here. it's just a loan, like any other with one big difference and that difference is how you choose to pay it back. - [narrator] learn how americans 62 years and older are accessing hundreds of thousands of dollars with a reverse mortgage loan from aag. - of course, you can use it to pay some bills, cover medical costs, update or repair your home, but best of all, it eliminates those monthly mortgage payments, so you get more cash in your pocket every month. if you're looking for some extra cash for whatever reason, your home's equity just might be the right solution. - [narrator] talk to aag for the best reverse mortgage solutions. america's leader in reverse mortgages is ready to help you reach your retirement goals. - why don't you give aag a call?
finally getting there...is the best! but with febreze freshness in your car... ...driving there is pretty darn good too. enjoy 30 days of freshness with febreze car. ♪ la, la, la, la, la ♪ do you struggle to fall asleep and stay asleep? qunol sleep formula combines 5 key nutrients that can help you fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer, and wake up refreshed. the brand i trust is qunol.
the omicron variant spreading so fast, the cdc estimating it now accounts for 95% of all new covid infections, up from just 8% a month ago. and with the spike in covid cases, at least 113,000 americans are now hospitalized with the virus and hospitals are overwhelmed. i want to bring in now dr. robert wachter. he's the chair of the ucsf department of medicine where researchers identified the first omicron case in the u.s. i'm so happy to have you here. good evening to you. dr. wachter, let's start with the new guidance from the cdc, shortening the isolation period
for someone with a positive test but no symptoms to five days. but there's no required test at the end of those five days to end the quarantine. is this the best message, knowing how contagious omicron is? >> yeah, i don't think they got this one right, don. i think there is an imperative to try to shorten the length of time that people are in isolation, particularly for hospitals and clinics and airplanes and all sorts of reasons. but most people will not be infectious at five days, but some people still will. so i think the better message would have been five days and then a rapid test or, better yet, two days in a row to have negative rapid tests before you come out of isolation. they also need to strengthen the message about wearing a mask. the idea is you come out of isolation, but you should still wear a very good mask. and i'd say an n95 for another five days just to be absolutely sure you're not infectious. >> we've heard everything from, you know, n95s are the best and recommended to cloth masks are still okay.
what is your choice for the best given the spread that we are seeing right now? is it n95? >> yeah. i don't think there's any question the n95 is a better mask or the kn95 or any variations of that theme. it filters out far more virus the cloth mask does very, very little. so for much of the pandemic, i was wearing a surgical mask with a cloth mask on top, which isn't bad and gets you maybe 70% of the way there. but since omicron became the thing, i figure the virus has upped its game in terms of its ability to infect me. i need to up my game in terms of my ability to keep it at bay. when i'm wearing a mask, which is pretty much every time i'm indoors, unless i'm in my bubble, i'm wearing an n95 for the equivalent. >> i want you to look at this public plea from e.r. doctors and nurses in massachusetts asking people not to come in with mild covid symptoms or.
it says our emergency departments are at a critical capacity and things will get worse. waiting rooms are overflowing and hospital admission beds are limited throughout massachusetts. in the coming days and weeks, we will see more nurses, doctors, and support staff become infected and stay home to isolate and get well. this situation will challenge our emergency departments and hospitals even more. the people and facilities are at a breaking point now. >> that they are, and this is now two years into it. the thrill is very much gone. i think we also know that a fair number of people that are coming in very sick have made some bad choices. they need the care. they deserve the care. but still it didn't have to happen. much of that was preventable. and we're facing a different kind of crisis than we faced a year or two ago. we never really had the challenge where we had a lot of nurses and docs and other health care workers who were out sick as well. and it's also happening at the peak of winter when hospitals
are already full. we tend to run very full over the winter because of flu and other kinds of seasonal illnesses. so you're talking about very full hospitals with a lot of covid patients on top of it. even though some covid patients are coming in for other things and they have, quote, incidental covid, you still have to isolate them. they still take a lot of extra time. then on top of that, a lot of health care workers out sick. so we've got to -- it really is at the breaking point in many cities. where i am in san francisco, it's not quite that bad, but we're planning for it to get that bad. it could get that way everywhere. >> doctor, thank you so much. i appreciate your time. >> thank you, don. >> thank you for watching, everyone. our coverage continues. unique zinc formula. it shortens colds! zicam. zinc that cold! blendjet's holiday sale is on now for the #1 gift this holiday season, the blendjet 2 portable blender. it packs the power
of a big blender on the go, and it crushes right through ice. just drop in your favorite ingredients, even frozen fruit, and make a smoothie any time, anywhere. blendjet cleans itself. just add a drop of soap, water, and blend. recharge quickly with any usb port. order now on blendjet.com and get our best deal ever! do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy - even a term policy - for an immediate cash payment. call coventry
direct to learn more. we thought we had planned carefully for our retirement. but we quickly realized we needed a way to supplement our income. our friend sold their policy to help pay their medical bills, and that got me thinking. maybe selling our policy could help with our retirement. i'm skeptical, so i did some research and called coventry direct. they explained life insurance is a valuable asset that can be sold. we learned we could sell all of our policy, or keep part of it with no future payments. who knew? we sold our policy. now we can relax and enjoy our retirement as we had planned. if you have $100,000 or more of life insurance, you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without finding out what it's worth. visit coventrydirect.com to find out if your policy qualifies. or call the number on your screen. coventry direct, redefining insurance.
hello and a very warm welcome to our viewers join you us in the united states and right around the world. i'm isa soares and here's what's on "cnn newsroom." >> the united states capitol police as an organization is stronger and better prepared, but we've got to keep working at it and making it safer and safer and safer. >> i would hope that he would do the right thing and come forward. anchor sean hannity's call by the house committee t