Skip to main content

tv   State of the Union  CNN  November 27, 2011 12:00pm-1:00pm EST

12:00 pm
that nbc would have apologized to her and likely they could have fired the drummer or at least suspended him. >> you know what? she's right. and nbc executives finally came to their senses and apologized for this off-key insult. well, that's it for this edition of "reliable sources." i'm howard kurtz. hope you're enjoying the thanksgiving weekend. we'll be back here next sunday morning 11:00 a.m. eastern for another critical look at the media. "state of the union" with candy crowley begins right now. another shot of helium for the high-flying campaign of newt gingrich. the endorsement of a major conservative newspaper in new hampshire. today, october's front-runner, herman cain, on trying to regain his traction. and the air wars, dissecting political ads with the experts mark mckinnon, elaine quijano mcclain and newt goldstein. the newt endorsement from the "new hampshire union leader" with editorial page editor andrew cline. and then, all things political with "time" magazine's michael scherer and a.b.
12:01 pm
stoddard of "the hill." i'm candy crowley and this is "state of the union." 'tis the season for endorsements -- or not. a big "not" this week in iowa from "the family leader" -- the influential social conservative group -- said it won't even consider backing herman cain, citing, in part, a narrative of questions versus clarity on the key issues of life, marriage, foreign policy, and presidential readiness. joining us now from atlanta is herman cain. mr. cain, thank you so much for joining us here. i want to show our audiences, we noted you were the front-runner in october. this is our latest cnn/orc poll which shows you running at about 17%. that's an eight-point drop since october. you have the "manchester union leader" coming out endorsing newt gingrich, who's now first in some of these polls. you have "the family leader" saying they didn't want to
12:02 pm
consider you because they don't really think you are ready for it. what do you think has gone wrong in the past month or so? >> well, obviously false accusations and confusion about some of my positions has contributed to it. you know, that was to be expected. in terms of the campaign itself, nothing has gone wrong in terms of our strategy of spending time in iowa, new hampshire, south carolina and florida. so in terms of the mechanics of the campaign nothing's gone wrong. but as you know, candy, some people are heavily influenced by perception more so than reality. the good news is, most of my supporters, they have stayed on the cain train, as we say. >> let me talk a little bit about perception and maybe what you think you might have done to add to some of this perception. we have the words from the "family leader" today saying there just isn't some clarity in so many things they wanted to know, from abortion and family issues, to foreign policy. and there is a group called
12:03 pm, a nonpartisan group that kind of looks at what people say. they looked at your words on the allegations of sexual harassment, your explanation of your position on abortion, some of your answers on foreign policy and took into consideration your 9-9-9 policy and what it would do to those below the poverty level, and they were even harder on you than "the family leader." they wrote, what's clear in all of this is that when cain plays fast and loose with the facts and when he comes under attack, he exhibits a pattern of evasiveness and misdirection, changing his position and then blaming others for misunderstanding him. do you think that you've made some mistakes here in dealing with some of these things that have come at you pretty hard and heavy over the past month? >> well some of them, candy, have been taken out of context. so let me just set the record straight. i am pro-life from conception, period. secondly -- >> would you agree there was
12:04 pm
confusion there? because you indicated in some interviews that that wasn't your position. >> no, i did not. see, that was taken out of context, is what i'm saying. the interview where it was taken out of context was a highly hypothetical situation and they pulled that out without showing the entire segment. so this is why i'm setting the record straight because confusion has been generated. i'm pro-life from conception. secondly, on foreign policy, my foreign policy philosophy is peace through strength and clarity. i've been real clear about that. and the other thing relative to foreign policy is that i've been real clear about how i disagree with president obama on the draw-down of troops in afghanistan and iraq, et cetera. so i've been real clear. but a lot of confusion has been thrown my way, and that's part of the -- part of politics. but it's real clear where i stand. >> you don't think you could be clearer? because it does seem you say to our piers morgan that when the question comes to life of the mother in abortion, that should be up to the family.
12:05 pm
but you're saying that was taken out of context. >> yes, candy. that whole segment i talked about my position on life from conception, no exceptions. they didn't show that. then he basically raised a highly hypothetical situation relative to if it were my granddaughter, and that's when they took that part out of context because of a poor choice of words in retrospect that then got later blown out and it became the story. >> i mean i guess that's what i'm getting to, is that you did say, well, that should be up to the family in response to a specific question about your granddaughter. so i just wonder if you -- >> but candy, candy, please. please allow me. see, the issue of do i believe abortion should be illegal? the answer is absolutely yes. but, see, what it's taken to another hypothetical situation, that's what was taken out of context.
12:06 pm
>> okay. let me move you on to some issues here. as you know, in the foreign policy, national security debate newt gingrich caused quite a storm when he said that he thought there should be a humane way to somehow legitimize some of the undocumented workers that have been in this country for 25 years, pay their taxes, played by the rules, had family ties. do you agree with that? >> my position has been real clear. the illegal immigration issue has four problems. secure the border for real. enforce the laws that are there. i don't believe we need another path. we don't need any special exceptions. we need to clean up the bureaucracy that's already there. >> but there's 8 million -- >> -- promote the path to citizenship -- nope, candy, i'm not going where newt gingrich is. >> why? >> i'm simply stating my position. my position is secure the border for real. promote the path to citizenship that already exists. the problem is the bureaucracy
12:07 pm
in getting people here legally. now, then the way i would deal with those that are already here, which has been my stated position, empower the states to deal with the illegals that are already here. not some big grandiose national one-size-fits-all. i believe that the states should be empowered to deal with the illegals that are already here. >> so it would be okay with you if states said, all right, those of you who meet certain criteria can be put on a path toward legalization, towards citizenship. >> it would be up to the states as long as they did not break the federal law. >> okay. so in some ways, this is an issue you would leave to the states, but you don't argue with newt gingrich's position even though his is -- seems to be a federal position that he would like the federal government to take that position. >> right. his position has created some controversy. here's another one of those gray areas that he's thrown out there that's created some controversy. i'm basically restating what
12:08 pm
i have stated consistently relative to that. >> which is that it would be okay to you if states granted some sort of amnesty to those already living here. >> no, no, candy, i did not use that word. this is how misperceptions get started. i am not saying that at all. i am saying -- >> but you're saying it is okay with you if states said to undocumented workers, if you meet certain criteria, you may stay here. >> no, no, no. >> isn't that what you just -- >> that's not what i'm saying. let me go back. let's try this one more time. please. >> all right. >> give me a chance one more time to state this. >> go right ahead. >> because it's a package. secure the border for real, promote the path to citizenship that's already there and the path to citizenship that's already there doesn't say anything about amnesty. thirdly, enforce the laws that are already there. but make it easier for companies to be able to enforce the laws. and fourth, empower the states. don't give the states any special things to do. just empower them to do, within
12:09 pm
the law, what the federal government is not doing. that's my approach to the whole issue. >> i think i'm a little confused, but we want to move on. we'll take a quick break and when we come back i'll move to some other issues of the day. we'll be right back. t on softba. and tea parties. i'll have more awkward conversations than i'm equipped for because i'm raising two girls on my own. i'll worry about the economy more than a few times before they're grown. but it's for them, so i've found a way. who matters most to you says the most about you. massmutual is owned by our policyholders so they matter most to us. massmutual. we'll help you get there.
12:10 pm
[ woman on r♪ bum-bum,stinct ] bum-bum, bum-bum ♪ ♪ bum-bum - ♪ ai, ai, ai - ♪ bum-bum - ♪ bum-bum, bum-bum - ♪ [ ice rattles rhythmically ] ♪ bum-bum, bum-bum, bum-bum ♪ ♪ [ imitates guitar noise ] ♪ [ vocalizing up-tempo heavy metal song ] ♪ [ vocalizing continues ] ♪ [ all singing ] the redesigned, 8-passenger pilot. smarter thinking. from honda. to find you a great deal, even if it's not with us. [ ding ] oh, that's helpful! well, our company does that, too. actually, we invented that.
12:11 pm
it's like a sauna in here. helping you save, even if it's not with us -- now, that's progressive! call or click today. no mas pantalones! the sleep number bed. with the sleep number bed, it's not about soft or firm. it's about support where you find it most comfortable. the magic of this bed is that you're sleeping on something that conforms to your individual shape. on a traditional mattress, there is no adjustment. you get what you're buying that day. with our bed, you change the setting to something you like. this way, if you change your mind once you get home you can adjust it. and now, queen sleep number mattresses start at just $599. and for four days only, save an incredible 50% on our innovative limited edition bed. wow! that feels really good. it's hugging my body. you can adjust it to whatever your needs are. if i'm in pain one day, in less than a minute i can get more support. your body changes over time. the bed can adapt with you. not only does it work for you today, but it's going to work for you 20 years from now. so whatever you feel like, the sleep number bed's
12:12 pm
going to provide it for you. discover the amazing sleep number bed - the ultimate gift to yourself - at the ultimate sleep number event. now through monday only, and only at the sleep number store. back with the republican presidential candidate herman cain. mr. cain, because the super committee didn't get its work done, there are many things that are going to expire at the end of the year if congress doesn't act on them. i wanted to get your opinion on a couple of them. one of them is there is a payroll tax cut that is what you pay for social security in your paycheck that's been in effect -- it is a little over 2%. if congress does not act, that payroll tax cut will go away, meaning that about almost $1,000 to the average american will be gone from their paycheck. do you support extending that payroll tax cut? >> i could support extending it,
12:13 pm
but here's the problem -- it didn't do any good the first time. that is a thimble of water in the ocean. the president -- >> but isn't it something? >> of course it is. >> i mean, if you've got millions of americans that have $1,000 more in their pocket, that's got to help. >> candy, i'm agreeing with you. a thousand dollars would help a lot of people, but it is a distraction from the big problem, and that is a lack of effective economic policy to grow this economy. so arguing over whether or not we should extend it or not extend it, that's not the issue. the issue is where's the economic growth for the entire economy? >> long-term unemployment benefits expire at the end of this year. that is unemployment benefits for those who have been unemployed for 99 weeks or more. >> right. >> do you believe those unemployment benefits should be extended? >> no. and here's why. where do we stop, candy, is the question. here again, extending
12:14 pm
unemployment benefits, extending the cut in the payroll tax are just distractions from the bigger problem, which is lack of economic growth which has not been there. secondly, we're spending money we do not have. it's unfortunate that people are unemployed. this is one of the reasons that i have proposed a bold plan to get this economy going, which you know is 9-9-9. people need to go -- want to go back to work. that's the good news. but this economy's not producing the jobs in order to get 14 million people that are unemployed back to work. >> about 2 million of those will lose their benefits in long-term unemployment benefits are not extended. and there are lots of studies that show that one of the quickest ways to get money into the economy is through these unemployment benefits. so if i read you correctly, you would not be for extending those for another year but you would be for the payroll tax cut.
12:15 pm
>> candy, it's not that simple. and this is part of the problem. what we need to do to get this economy growing is to put fuel in the engine which is to cut taxes to businesses and individuals, rather than just cutting the payroll tax where people might have a thousand dollars. let's cut -- if the president wants to do something in the short term, cut income taxes. cut corporate taxes. this is something that i was proposing earlier. that would -- that would solve the problem. this is just tinkering around the edges. that's what i'm saying. >> right. and it may well be in terms of not getting huge tax reform around not reforming social security or medicare. but that -- none of the big things are going to happen by the end of this year. so that's why i'm asking with you these are going to come up incrementally and so i'm asking you whether you think, in the absence of these other things that you are talking about,
12:16 pm
those ought to be passed. >> but candy, if the president were to go to congress and say, i want to lower personal income taxes and corporate taxes by a significant amount in order to do something such that next year will not be an economic flat line, i believe he would get that support. it simply is not in his dna. so no. taking a position on extending unemployment benefits, or leaving that two percentage point reduction in payroll taxes, that's not working on the right problem. that's my point. >> all right. let me move you to some foreign policy issues. in the debate recently, you were asked about the tsa. i just want to remind our viewers what you said. >> i believe we can do a whole lot better with tsa, and i call it targeted identification. if you take a look at the people who have tried to kill us, it would be easy to figure out exactly what that identification profile looks like. >> targeted identification. can you expand on that? is that another word for profiling?
12:17 pm
>> i don't see it as another word for profiling. this is why i use the term "targeted identification." >> okay. what's the difference? >> targeted identification is a deliberate approach to figure out patterns associated with people who have tried to kill us. that's what that is. profiling has been used in a lot of other situations and it obscures the whole issue. targeted identification. if we go to the intelligence agencies and ask them to identify the people that have tried to hurt us, kill us, blow up our planes and things of this nature, they could do that. so targeted identification in my mind is different from profiling because profiling has been used in a very negative way. >> and so -- but this sounds a little bit like flying while middle eastern, not unlike driving while black. is that -- i'm just trying to get a handle on how you would do this.
12:18 pm
>> candy, you are trying to pull me into the rhetoric that gets people in trouble, and what i'm trying to do is to not be drawn into that. no. i am not trying to identify a particular religion, a particular color, a particular ethnicity. i'm simply saying we should not be afraid to identify those characteristics that basically have been consistent in people who have tried to hurt this country. that's all i'm saying. >> let me ask you -- governor romney said, when you were talking about israel and the middle east during the debate, that the first country he would visit, should he become president, would be israel just to show the nature of that special relationship. where would the first country be that herman cain visits? >> israel would be one of the first countries. i might do a swing through europe and the middle east and certainly israel would be one of the countries that i would want
12:19 pm
to visit as part of my first foreign visit because i feel strongly that we should stand with israel and we should basically strengthen that relationship. so it would be one of the first, amongst many that i would include in an overseas trip. >> herman cain, thank you for being with us. we appreciate it. see you on the campaign trail. >> thank you, candy. up next -- we'll examine the political ad wars. nice, huh? yeah. you know what else is nice is all the savings you can get on cruze and traverse over there. oh! that's my beard. [ chuckles ] it's amazing. ♪ [ male announcer ] this holiday, chevy's giving more. now very well qualified lessees can sign and drive a 2012 cruze ls for around $199 a month. ♪ how did i get here? dumb luck? or good decisions?
12:20 pm
ones i've made. ones we've all made. about marriage. children. money. about tomorrow. here's to good decisions. who matters most to you says the most about you. massmutual is owned by our policyholders so they matter most to us. massmutual. we'll help you get there.
12:21 pm
democrats aren't waiting for the formality of primary season to pick president obama's republican opponent. they're playing the odds and putting ads up in states they think will be in play next november. >> almost half of arizona homeowners, underwater. foreclosures everywhere. and what's mitt romney's plan? >> don't try and stop the foreclosure process. let it run its course and hit the bottom. >> reporter: let arizonans hit the bottom?
12:22 pm
mitt romney's message to arizona -- you're on your own. >> this type of ad is known as "in their own words." reality ads, if you will, cherry-picking quotes to attack a rival with his own sound bites. they are all the rage. mitt romney also ignoring his primary rivals ran his first tv ad this week. >> thank you, new hampshire! how's everybody doing today? i am confident that we can steer ourselves out of this crisis. we need a rescue plan for the middle class. we need to provide relief for homeowners. it's got to take a new direction. if we keep talking about the economy, we're going to lose. >> democrats cried foul because in that last statement, then-candidate obama was actually quoting the campaign of his then-rival john mccain. the idea of reality ads is to break through to voters cynical of paid advertising, but do they work? our panel of advertising and political experts next.
12:23 pm
p with that little hardware store we didn't intend for your face to be everywhere. but fedex office makes it so easy. not only do they ship stuff, they print flyers, brochures -- everything i need to get my name out there. that's the problem. now we need to give you a third identity. you're paul matheson. and you're gonna run your business into the ground. erik gustafson would never do that! there is no erik gustafson. hey that's erik gustafson!!! there is no erik gustafson!!!!! [ male announcer ] small business solutions. fedex. solutions that matter. the sleep number bed. with the sleep number bed, it's not about soft or firm. it's about support where you find it most comfortable. the magic of this bed is that you're sleeping on something that conforms to your individual shape. on a traditional mattress, there is no adjustment. you get what you're buying that day. with our bed, you change the setting to something you like. this way, if you change your mind once you get home you can adjust it. and now, queen sleep number mattresses start at just $599. and for four days only, save an incredible 50% on our innovative limited edition bed.
12:24 pm
wow! that feels really good. it's hugging my body. you can adjust it to whatever your needs are. if i'm in pain one day, in less than a minute i can get more support. your body changes over time. the bed can adapt with you. not only does it work for you today, but it's going to work for you 20 years from now. so whatever you feel like, the sleep number bed's going to provide it for you. discover the amazing sleep number bed - the ultimate gift to yourself - at the ultimate sleep number event. now through monday only, and only at the sleep number store. joining us now to assess the 2012 political advertising landscape, ken goldstein of media analysis group, kiki maclean who advised then-senator
12:25 pm
hillary clinton on her 2008 presidential bid, and in boston, mark mckinnon, advertising director for president george w. bush in 2000 and 2004. i want to start with a web ad and it was very early on when rick perry entered the race. i think in the first couple of weeks. here's a little bit of it for our viewers. >> i love these folks who say, well, this is obama's economy. that's fine. >> zero jobs. >> not a single job. >> no jobs created. zip, zero. >> people are demoralized. >> a great country requires a better direction. a renewed nation needs a new president. i believe in america. i believe in a purpose and a promise. i believe her best days have not yet been lived. >> okay, so mark mckinnon, my first question to you is, is there such a thing as going overboard?
12:26 pm
you know, clearly we have the pounding horse hooves and the texas boots and there's this very clear differentiation between here's president obama and there's all this confusion, the economy's bad, and in rides a guy on a white horse from the west. it just has a sort of "legends of of the fall" feel to it. >> these days you have to press the envelope. the president's whole zero idea got a lot of attention. and we're seeing how much focus there is on web content as opposed to actual web advertising. what they're trying to do is break through and get attention, and this spot achieved that. it got a lot of attention. >> it did get a lot of attention. great ad. the more i watched it, i thought whoa. >> i can't decide if sort of will smith and tommy lee jones are going to come out, "men in black," it is almost like a movie preview that comes out. but mark used an important word, and that was content.
12:27 pm
right? anymore these days whether you are working in corporate america politics, this is about content, not just advertising, because it's used in different ways. awe yore going to see the campaigns this year. it's not just digital advertising or social media, special videos. but it is really about content. >> let me ask you, ken. the difference between a web ad and tv ad. obviously, if they want to they can turn this into a tv ad. it would have to be a little bit shorter, i think. but who sees these web ads? are they aimed at just us playing it like we just did or what's the use of it? >> it is aimed at you and it is aimed at people who are going to give money. so what we've seen so far in this primary battle on the republican side is very, very little broadcast advertising in spot markets. we've seen some of these videos online and agreeing with both mark and kiki, content matters and trying to get through -- you think there is a noise now, wait until you see the noise that happens in 2012 and you're going to need a really compelling message to get through.
12:28 pm
but those are very cheap ways for them to try something out, maybe raise a little money off of it, and then get the free media to amplify their message. >> say look at this cool ad we just found on the web. >> exactly. >> in some ways does this make the web the new iowa or new hampshire where you can really run cheaply and you don't have to be up against the big guns? it used to be all tv. you had to have money to put these kinds of things on tv. now, not so much. >> i've been studying it for a number of years. and these guys have been doing it far number of years. in the odd-numbered year i always have a bunch of reporters calling me up and saying this is going to be the year that it is not tv advertising. then the same reporters call on the even number of year and ask me to give a quote on the record-breaking level of tv advertising. i think that's again going to be case here. these are targeted towards free media and targeted towards fund-raising.
12:29 pm
we're still going to see a tremendous amount of advertising in 2012. i think it's more the detornadoses and the daily drama of the republican primary that's which you wering up news cycle day after news cycle day, and every day that's churned up is a day mitt romney doesn't have to hear another ad. >> this is from the bachmann campaign. i think it is always interesting to know when these ads air. this was released november 16th and it's around the time or actually a little later than that michele bachmann was saying to people, you don't have to settle for somebody who isn't a true conservative. you can get a really true conservative this time because it is going to be easy to beat barack obama. so here's her ad going after her fellow republicans. >> i believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. >> ultimately gets down to a choice that that family or that mother has to make. >> if you say that we should not
12:30 pm
educate children who have come into our state for no other reason than they've been brought there, i don't think you have a heart. >> hi, i'm nancy pelosi. >> i'm newt gingrich. >> together we can do this. >> i love that ad for some reason. i think it is just because nancy pelosi and newt gingrich are on the couch. but nonetheless, mark, is that an effective ad to you? >> yeah, it is effective. and michele bachmann's actually had a pretty focused message. sometimes it's been undiscipl e undisciplin undisciplined. but she's got a clear, conservative message that she's the true conservative. think that's actually pretty powerful. the problem for bachmann at this point is that she can only do web advertising because she's broke. but if she could put that ad on in iowa where she's really from, she's the one that should be having the resurgence, not newt gingrich. >> right. she can't go up on with that. >> i agree with mark on that. we're seeing a lot more of this, candidates saying something in their own words and that being
12:31 pm
used against them. i think that is going to be the major thing we see in advertising that shines through in 2012. when mark was first working for george w. bush in 2000, not every single thing that then-governor bush said in the lead-up of the year before was on tape. now it is. either because -- >> thank god. >> now it is either because editorial board meetings are being taped, plus the first job of the kid in politics now is taking a video camera and going and following the candidate around. >> it's not just from a podium now. it's everywhere. that's going to show up in ads. >> they used to make sure the route is covered in signs. now it is make sure are you at the event with a flip cam. >> exactly. exactly. i want to move you on. there is this whole idea of outside groups that have tons and tons of money. one of those that's gotten a lot of attentions, crossroads, a republican group, karl rove is one of those, and they are already up and out with a lot of advertising, and this one's called two presidents, two visions. >> two presidents. two visions.
12:32 pm
>> should we raise taxes on anybody right today? rich or poor or middle class? no. >> a political stunt, not a solution. a bill full of tax increases. >> this one i thought was interesting for where it went. colorado, florida, north carolina, ohio and pennsylvania. every one of those states carried by barack obama in 2008. where he is now showing some weakness. so this is about geography to me in a lot of ways. what do you think when you look at it and the amount of money that's out there -- i mean there's something like 240 super pacs out there that are going to collect money. what's going to be the driving force in this election? is it going to be those outside groups? >> that's going to be the big story. barack obama is going to be well funded for money he's raising for his campaign and raising for the party. i would expect the eventual republican nominee will also be well fund bud let's see what those groups do. those republican groups that
12:33 pm
shown they can raise that money and they showed it in 2010. the big story now is are there groups on the democratic side going to be able to raise that sort of money, and with so many different players who can't speak to each other, are they going to get the message right. because you might have 10, 11, 12 different players and they could screw things up as well just as much for their enemies as for their friends. >> you end up answering for groups have you no control over. >> this is the big point. right? everybody's going to be funded. nobody's not going to have enough air time. the question is who's paying for that air time and what's the accountability on that air time? that very piece that you just saw where they're trying to pit clinton against obama has come under a lot of scrutiny by the fact checkers. >> it was one of the things i was going to ask mark about. it got a "d" from one of the fact check people. it said he did say that but what he also said was, i think when the economy starts to recover we need to tax the rich. >> there was a slice and dice in it. that particular ad is under a lot of scrutiny and a lot of criticism. the question is how are you going to track that and hold accountable? an ad that comes directly from a
12:34 pm
campaign, a lot of accountability. you can call them on it, stand up right in front of them. a group that's maybe here for two years, gone in six months? what's the accountability and i think that has a lot to do with it. >> mark, when an ad is put together, you clearly put an ad together to enhance the guy you want to have win. how much does it hurt when these fact checks come out? sometimes i feel like it's just -- we're against so much headwind that you can come out and say, listen, this ad takes clinton out of context, yes, he said that, but he also said he agrees with president obama that the rich ought to pay more, et cetera, et cetera. is that just white noise? does the ad always have more impact once it is out there? >> yeah, sure, it does. because it's getting $2 million, $3 million worth of money behind it when there might just be a web story or a fact check ad that brings some accountability. kiki is absolutely right. these super pacs -- there are
12:35 pm
240 of them now -- they are going to raise $1 billion collectively, it's been estimated, which is as much as barack obama or the republicans will raise. the crossroads run by karl rove and the pac run by obama's folks are both going to spend more than $100 million each which is more than the public spending that campaigns would qualify if they took it. so this is not just a race between barack obama and the the republican nominee, it is a race between the super pacs which i think is just outrageous. it is not good for democracy and as kiki said, the biggest problem is there is no accountability. so if there is fact check problem, who's going to answer it? because there's no candidate behind it. >> mark, if you are a tv viewer or you roam the web and look at political ads, would you believe any of them? >> no. that's the problem. the threshold anymore to break through on the credibility component is so difficult anymore.
12:36 pm
i mean, voters just start off incredibly cynical and with the notion that whatever they see, they think the politicians are lying to them. so the threshold to break through for the campaigns is extraordinarily high. so to do anything effective these days is really difficult. >> ken goldstein, kiki maclean, mark mckinnon, thanks, all. when we return, newt, not romney? we'll ask the "new hampshire union leader's" editorial page editor why. and i served a tour in iraq. all the skills that i learned in the military are very transferable into the corporate and real world. chase hired me to be a personal banker. the 100,000 jobs mission has definitely helped me get my foot in the door. chase is giving opportunities to vets who don't think that there's any opportunity out there. chase and these other companies are getting a great deal when they hire veterans. chase is proud to help 100,000 veterans find jobs at home. [ electronic beeping ] [ male announcer ] still getting dandruff?
12:37 pm
neutrogena® t/gel shampoo defeats dandruff after just one use. t/gel shampoo. it works. neutrogena®. long-lasting, too. yeah, i could really use this silverado. i'm a big hunter. oh, what do you hunt? deer. fish. fantastic. ♪ this holiday, chevy's giving more. now qualified buyers can get 0% apr for 72 months on a 2011 chevy silverado.
12:38 pm
or 0% apr financing for 60 months plus no monthly payments until spring. ♪ ♪ imagine me and you, i do ♪ i think about you day and night ♪ ♪ it's only right ♪ to think about the girl you love ♪ ♪ and hold her tight ♪ so happy together [ male announcer ] when life changes, so can your insurances needs. use travelers free guide to better coverage to stay prepared. is your auto and home insurance keeping up with you? contact your local travelers agent, or call 800-my-coverage.
12:39 pm
12:40 pm
joining us now is andrew cline, the editorial page editor of the "new hampshire union leader." drew, thank you for joining us. you all today endorsed newt gingrich and said basically you don't always agree with him and he comes with a lot of baggage, but nonetheless, you're going to endorse him. i want you to read between the lines for me a little bit when you wrote, "we would rather back someone with whom we may sometimes disagree than one who tells us what he thinks we want to hear." sounds to me like a slam on mitt romney. >> well, i don't know that i'd call it a slam, and i don't know that i would leave it just to mitt romney. but you got to look at all the candidates that are running and
12:41 pm
examine them very closely and listen very carefully to what they are telling you. and in our assessment, if you were to balance it between romney and gingrich, romney is a very play-it-safe candidate. he doesn't want to offend everybody -- or anybody. he wants to be liked. he wants to try to reach out and be very safe, reach out to everybody, bring everybody on-board. and that's, a, not very realistic, but imagine what that would be like as president, somebody who plays it very safe. i don't think we are in the kind of situation right now as a country that that's necessarily the right kind of president at the moment. perhaps in the late 19th century, perfect. right now, we're in a lot of trouble in this country. we need a candidate that is bold in his leadership, that has a vision for where he wants to take the country, and knows how to get there. those two things are very important. >> did you take into consideration electability? mitt romney has been leading in
12:42 pm
new hampshire for i think probably since we starred taking polls here this time around. he consistently tends to be tied, be competitive with the president in places where perhaps newt gingrich is not, although it has been some time since we saw head-to-head with newt gingrich. does electability fit in? it sounds to me like are you saying no. >> well, yeah, of course electability is a factor. it is one of many factors. but i don't think you can look at this particular moment, this little snapshot in the polling, and conclude, therefore, that a year from now mitt romney will be more electable than newt gingrich. i think that's a very false assumption. >> would you have picked newt gingrich a month ago, two months ago, when it looked for all the world like his campaign was dead? would you still have picked him? >> we did that with john mccain in 2008 and it worked out pretty well.
12:43 pm
>> so you -- i mean, it did look a little bit -- but i think mccain was in a stronger position in new hampshire than newt gingrich was in the single digits a couple months ago. >> i think we look at the candidates for their -- i'm sorry. we consider the candidate overall. i mean, we don't just look at the poll numbers. this isn't a game where we're trying to win the primary so we can have a record of "x" number of wins. we don't look at it that way. we are not trying to attach our name to a winner. that's not really leading. that would do our readers a very big disservice. we're looking at who we would like to see as president. >> drew cline from the "new hampshire union leader" making big news there today. i know in new hampshire -- the only statewide newspaper endorsing newt gingrich. thank you so much for your time, drew. >> my pleasure. up next, our political panel on how the "new hampshire union leader's" endorsement of newt gingrich could shake up the republican presidential race. hey, guys.
12:44 pm
ni-i-i-ck. oh... i thought those were put out for me. i did it again. no worries, nick. [ sighs ] say, nick, you must be busy this holiday. oh, yeah, with all the great savings we got going on, it's been crazy. ooh, i got to dash away. customers lining up. ♪ [ male announcer ] this holiday, chevy's giving more. ♪
12:45 pm
12:46 pm
[♪...] >> announcer: now get a $250 airfare credit, plus save up to 65%. call 1-800-sandals. certain restrictions apply.
12:47 pm
joining us now, "time" magazine's michael scherer, and a.b. stoddard of "the hill" newspaper. thank you both for joining us.
12:48 pm
i want to show our audience a couple of new polls from american research group. this is iowa, first of all. newt gingrich, 27%. romney, 20%. paul, 16%. on down the line in single digits, cain, bachmann and santorum. moving to new hampshire, romney 33%, gingrich 22%. paul 12%. single digits again, cain, undecided, and huntsman. okay. couple questions. is newt gingrich a serious contender at this point? >> i think the endorsement of "the union leader" makes him a serious threat to mitt romney potentially in new hampshire in ways that he might not have anticipated and we'll see what happens in the polls in the next few weeks. i think in iowa it is easy to say newt's on top but that contest comes first. he has a lot of explaining to do on the immigration question. he has a lot of explaining to do on other issues. support for t.a.r.p. which he then took back.
12:49 pm
his position on climate change. his position on the ryan medicare plan. a mandate for health care, advanced directives for health care. he has a lot of answering to do in iowa before the counts on the cold january night. iowa could be a muddled picture where there's an anti-mitt romney vote split by gingrich and others, possibly even rick santorum, as well. organized there, ron paul could be a spoiler there. and i don't expect iowa to be so predictive. i think new hampshire becomes the big battleground. i think mitt romney still has a lot of advantages there, but this really propels newt gingrich into the top of the race there and makes him a real threat for romney. >> you know, people i've talked to say, oh, he hasn't pushed the self-destructive button yet. newt does -- everybody's waiting for that to happen. plus, it's not just old baggage which has to be gone through again, it's his links to health
12:50 pm
care industry, his links to the health care industry, his links to fannie mae and freddie mac, et cetera, et cetera. the question is, can he survive that without imploding? >> this is definitely an inoculation, the endorsement from "the union leader." conservative credential, we were waiting for the newt bubble to burst, waiting for him to be treated as the others, reality show contenders. we had herman cain on earlier. who go up and down the next week because the ratings change. but this says newt gingrich is a serious guy. a serious person for conservatives to look at. i think it will inoculate him. the second thing isitis a real hit for mitt romney. you've had other establishment candidates not get "the union leader" endorse m in the past, but you haven't had an established candidate who has basically been living in new hampshire for five years now not get "the union leader" endorse m.
12:51 pm
>> he did take a swipe at mitt romney, a clear swipe at him. is there anybody, when you look at this polling, is there anybody who's like, forget it? can herman cain come back? can michele bachmann come back? can rick perry come back? >> i don't think rick perry can come back and i don't think herman cain can. i think jon huntsman, if he can't get traction soon, can't go anywhere. there is a chance that michele bachmann and rick santorum who are actively identifying voters and iowa coming up with the split showing, i think ron paul is tremendously organize there and could be a big spoiler. i would say i would count perry and cain out. >> i think this endorsement, they said it came down to perry or newt gingrich. and rick perry losing this lottery is another nail in what has been a historic collapse. it's hard to see him come back. >> the immigration issue that newt said we should probably take a humane approach. >> this is a problem. in trying to walk back these comments he's saying he was
12:52 pm
neve for a path to citizenship for anyone who came here illegally. he's for a path to legality. at what point is that okay for the -- >> the question of legality, citizenship, amnesty, wording -- >> it's words, and i think, again, those that will be a tough issue with the activist base of the party he's seeking to win over. >> this is one of newt's tendencies, that when he's cornered on a policy issue he reverts to complexity. he likes being complicated, likes making the issues. the anti-herman cain here. what's interesting about the newt immigration line is this was his line in march. no one was paying attention to him back there. he was giving interviews with univision, talking to hispanics about how he would govern as president. he has been consistent in this. the question is whether -- especially in iowa, where the immigration issue remains a huge issue among caucus-goers. whether this is just another deal breaker for him. >> let me move you to capitol hill.
12:53 pm
i -- the notion that the next election will fix the problems that we've had, and you wrote about that, michael, a great article, but let me ask you three things s i tried to ask herman cain about. one is the payroll tax cut, the 2% break that most americans are getting on social security taxes. is congress going to approve that by the end of the year? >> you really feel a sense among republicans especially these last few days that the sumer committee failed and they need to get some points on the board. they want to show bipartisan accomplishments. so i have a feeling in the late however -- hours of christmas we'll see some kind of deal to extend unemployment insurance in addition to payroll. if you look at other things they're looking at, it is almost $400 billion in new deficit spending. tough to beat. >> and whether they'll look at things that are gimmicky, to say we're paying for this, or whether they have to find substantive cuts which may be tough to get through. boehner doesn't have a clear
12:54 pm
record. there have been two or three times this year where boehner has clearly wanted to get points on the board and he's failed when it comes down to it at crunch time. it's not a sure thing. >> and also there are democrats that have looked at the payroll tax cut going i don't know that we've gotten enough bang for our buck, et cetera. just a hard thing to do at christmas. i walk away and go, oh, yeah, remember your unemployment benefits? no. >> and in politics, obama set this up well for himself. he's going to win either way. the white house knows, it. they're comfortable where they are. >> just go out of country, right? >> that's right. >> real quick, what about the medicare payments for doctors which will drop by 30% if congress doesn't act? will they act on that? >> yeah. we've got a whole other year until that trigger is pulled. it will be tied to the bush tax cults, not just medicare but it was cuts. they'll have to come up with a compromise. they'll be fighting along the same lines they're fighting along now. i don't think 2012 is going to solve anything. they're not going to have huge majorities for republicans or democrats.
12:55 pm
the change in the white house isn't going to make it so they can't override a veto. >> got to stop it there. amy, michael, thanks for being with us. >> thank you. the top stories are next, and then "fareed zakaria gps" at the top of the hour. [ male announcer ] still getting dandruff? neutrogena® t/gel shampoo defeats dandruff after just one use. t/gel shampoo. it works. neutrogena®.
12:56 pm
12:57 pm
12:58 pm
12:59 pm
time for a check of today's top stories. pakistan is calling a nato attack that killed 24 pakistani soldiers totally unacceptable. nato's secretary general says the deaths were tragic and unintended. the nato attack which wounded 13 others in a region bordering afghanistan occurred yesterday. 19 of 22 arab league countries have voted to impose economic sanctions on syria for its deadly crackdown on protesters. syrian government tv says sanctions would be unprecedented and contradict the rules of economic and trade cooperation among arab countries. britain's prince william co-piloted a helicopter that rescued two sailors from a life raft in the irish sea today. five other sailors are still missing. their ship capsized in gale-force winds. three american students detained in egypt are back home in the u.s. derrik sweeney, gregory porter, and luke gates were arrested after being accused t