Skip to main content
Internet Archive's 25th Anniversary Logo

tv   Quadriga - The New Arms Race A More Dangerous World  Deutsche Welle  February 16, 2018 5:30am-6:00am CET

5:30 am
survived but do they also have a future. i really understand people who say they don't want to stay here. but i also admire people who want to stay here and who decided to create something unique in peace time what needs to happen if tolerance and reconciliation are to stand a chance outer darkness cities after more starting march tenth on t.w. . alone a very warm welcome indeed to this latest edition of quadriga coming to you from the heart of the un's defense and security experts from around the world will be gathering here in germany this weekend for the highly influential munich security conference that comes at a time when experts say the world things on the brink on the brink that sees of a new omes race well they right certainly there are growing tensions between the
5:31 am
world's two keen euclide powers the united states and russia with both sides threatening to upgrade their nuclear capacity and china is also expanding its nuclear arsenal not to mention other countries with nuclear ambitions such as of course north korea so our question here on quadriga this week is the new race a more dangerous world and to answer that question or to discuss that question i'm joined here in the studio by constanza who is an expert on international relations and security policy with the brookings institution in washington she says the world has become a lot more dangerous in the last twelve months problems with effective arms control oh only one of several reasons also with us is motel naming an author and editor of the berlin based daily newspaper. the argues that none of the great powers profits from any kind of military escalation the world is getting unpredictable very. it's
5:32 am
simple but not necessarily more dangerous. than the warm welcome to to something whole from the german section of the nobel prize winning international campaign to abolish nuclear weapons widely known as i can she say since the adoption by the united nations of a nuclear bomb last july i am optimistic that nuclear weapons can be abolished in my lifetime something over you very much for that note of optimism that very same long term notes of optimism you're saying in your lifetime this tell us about how safe or unsafe the world the we currently live it is it's terrifically unsafe and some say it's even less safe than it was during the cold war. we've had several conferences on the subjects and experts of looked at it including chatham house the problem of risk and they say that we really have some big problems and it's not just a question of large scale mon martin this year modernization of nuclear weapons but
5:33 am
also there's more cyber problems than before despite problems cyber attacks and there are more nuclear weapon states this is a totally unpredictable situation still you say that you believe that nuclear weapons could be abolished within your lifetime what do i mean people would say that's a fine dream but you're a dreamer it's simply not going to happen well my experience shows it to be different actually in the in the worst times in the cold war those were the times when the best treaties were written and in my view it sometimes has to get worse to get better and i think we're now in that phase where it's got so bad that people are waking up to the problem and certainly one hundred twenty two states did just that last year and when they decided to adopt a treaty banning nuclear weapons so we have a majority already in the u.n. for a ban on nuclear weapons and that means to me that the chances of actually putting pressure on the nuclear weapon states has gone up and not down that they have to
5:34 am
actually start talking about disarmament although they're not at the moment prepared to do so constance a spokesman you're nodding. well i mean i was nodding out that last part i mean i have i have enormous respect for what you do and what i can does but i but i think that a majority in the u.n. is in at a time when international law seems to be under attack from all sides when. large and small states. gearing up the military abilities and not just nuclear weapons conventional weapons cyber capabilities hybrid wolf ok bill two years and are exhibiting the the will the intent to use them in all sorts of ways out of time when the russians are prepared to violate the principle of non-aggression in eastern europe are still in
5:35 am
a proxy war in ukraine and have illegally and next a whole province of ukraine. i'm somewhat less than confident that the nuclear states are going to bow to that prescription much as i would like that to happen something with your religion respond to the well i can understand that obviously over in the question of whether you're up to mystical pessimistic is mostly a personal one but in this instance i think the only realistic option to deal with this is not to lie down and say ok i resign the only thing that we can do is use any little bit of optimism that we have to actually stand up to the nuclear weapon states all of them and i don't just mean the united states and i certainly don't mean just russia all to north korea i mean all of them as a group and say from the rest of the world as it were that don't have nuclear weapons it's time to lay them down it's absolutely against international law to be
5:36 am
threatening each other especially with annihilation it's about time that we understood that nuclear weapons are like by the to can chemical weapons that we cannot possibly accept their use or the threats of the use. let's eliminate lots of unit two things in the focus of the show today the munich security conference is the war and the other one is the is the the question is there a new nuclear arms race emerging at this point in time the munich security conference. head of that one commentator said we live in an era we find ourselves suddenly in an era in which hard power increasingly trumps soft power is that a fair assessment. i would not say so i mean the recent nuclear posture review from the united states which puts some billions and billions of money into modernizing the nuclear and low yield nuclear weapons. the question is we had the
5:37 am
same discussion we were just talking about the eighty's the eighty's from mutually assured destruction is not enough when both powers have let's say ten intercontinental nuclear weapons and they could nearly the whole world actually then they switched over to a flexible response no we have to be credible and credibility is the new currency in this in these things so what is happening now in the united states they think about you will mention ing cyber war cyber war i think is the next battle but when a country like russia or china or any other country is going to cyber war how to react to low yield nuclear weapons deterrent against cyber war for example and all these questions are being asked in the surrounding so security is right now it is very hard to say how to how to be safe the next big thing is nuclear proliferation with terrorist organizations i think these two threats are the biggest cyber war and nuclear proliferation so the nuclear posture review just modernizing the whole
5:38 am
nuclear tomic weapon system is not dealing enough with these things they put one percent of the butts of the pentagon puts one percent of the budget to the anti cyber war so this is definitely not enough let's also not leave out of the picture political warfare. or as one of my of my brookings colleagues and a book has called it measures short of war which interfere in our politics in our societies in our economy is it something that the russians are doing but by no means only them the chinese the iranians the turks propaganda buying people this information all these things which have a toxic effect a destabilizing effect which undermined the kind of trust that you would need in societies to get to the kind of agreement that you would like to see and that are in arguably i mean happening every day and. you know we. inflicting real time damage on our on our polity isn't on also szell cohesion as we
5:39 am
speak and i think that is i think if we if we don't keep firmly in mind that that is where most of the aggression currently is happening we're losing a big part of the picture as much as i agree but if we're talking about about war and security two point four billion people already connected to the end of it. all cities and even aircraft carriers costing ten billions and more than ten billions of dollars are heavily reliant on computerization and detours ations if you need just to hackers or to to let one of these that offertory is not not not fight anymore this is the next threat or the whole cities are reliant on energy on water supply and everything else you can sabotage them with cyber war so i think this is a very very big danger and i'm afraid that all of these waste of money for the nuclear armament thing is really nothing else than the waste of money. concerns or
5:40 am
just coming back to the security conference in the report of the issue in advance of this weekend's gathering it says that in the last year the world got closer to the brink of significant conflict what does that mean closer to the brink of significant conflict i think it means we have seen a variety of actors who possess nuclear weapons but also significant conventional capability is threatening each other with actual warfare the north koreans chinese americans russians or actually under undertaking it. all of these things add to a climate of uncertainty and risk and increase the risk of strategic miscalculation by any of the other ones and that i think in taken together has made the world significantly less safe than it was say a decade ago or even two years ago something i absolutely agree with that and i was set. that we have to see that the nuclear weapon states all of them involved in one
5:41 am
way or another in conflicts around the world and at the moment also syria has several nuclear weapon states involved in it and i mean only just last week we had israel involved in a strike where one of its jets was was was brought down and so we see that the. chances of escalation are just going up the whole time through the fact that they're crossing each other's paths with their militaries all the time and we still have the undersell problem between india and pakistan which keeps going up and down all the time and it's always. had to us on the brink of a major i mean just that for instance take that for what would happen if india and pakistan had a limited new nuclear war which we call limited but you say that when we work this out with this study i.p.p. and did did study what was happening fifty on both sides fifty nuclear weapons
5:42 am
small nuclear weapons were used it would have effects globally that we never seen before displayed interest into a period of time where there was. less sunlight and less rain and we would literally have millions and millions of people dying from starvation because we couldn't grow enough food and there were those that there are things on the other hand i would say. i might disagree a little because for example the great power competition i think is not a real threat china has no improve and vision not at all united states is in a way war fatigue after afghanistan after iraq after all spending all these billions of dollars and in waste this wars i mean the experience with going to war is not so good even for the russians conquering the crimean peninsula is is they are stuck no in used ukraine losing. the soldiers wasting their money and for what
5:43 am
gains they don't gain anything i'm going to have to. sew the experience going to war the experience in the nineteenth century or the beginning of the twentieth century with the first world war as you can conquer let you can have resources you can even colonize other parts of the city who've been be bigger and more powerful these bigger and more powerful with going to war is nothing show me the war where people come out bigger more powerful you just don't have. yes it is true as the russians and end up with spectacularly bad real estate i mean north of. a positive actually quite nice but not the set and crimea nobody's idea of sort of really strategic acquisitions and i think what what was what was done here i think was more done for political purposes than for anything else however it is not true to say that russia and china currently are status quo powers the chinese are building out islands in the pacific helfer that are. the russians are revisionist are the
5:44 am
americans have been messaging to that allies and to the world that they are considering the ability to so-called bloody nose strike against north korea most of their allies have been saying please don't do this there is no way of containing such a strike but it is being apparently very seriously considered in washington so we should not assume that while it is true that the american citizenry is tired of the wars in afghanistan and iraq there are still a lot of american forces out in afghanistan and in iraq and are likely to remain there for a very long time and it is entirely possible that war will come to them even if they don't want to pursue it. and as we as we as we keep hearing in washington every day there are wars they. willing to present ok i'll break you off the just
5:45 am
for a second by the conversational goes and pitch is the key question we're addressing on the show today is how great is the threat of nuclear conflict well that's right suddenly seemed very real very recently to the people of hawaii you know getting over the last bugs a false alarm about a ballistic missile attack caused panic in the us state of hawaii for nearly forty minutes it seemed as though i want to attack was imminent the public response may have had something to do with concerns about the international nuclear arms race. for several years now north korean leader kim jong un has been croaking the u.s. with nuclear weapons test. china has also increased its nuclear force and. russia has modernized its nuclear arsenal. and several other countries are trying to develop nuclear weapons. washington is taking these developments very
5:46 am
seriously the u.s. plans to spend one point two trillion dollars over the next three decades to maintain and modernize its nuclear arsenal are we now facing an increased threat of nuclear war. something all of us episode in hawaii at the beginning of that report can you remember what went through your mind when you caught up with what was going what was happening that i remember very well how i reacted to that so i was thrown back into the eighty's i was i remember personally a situation as a nineteen year old where i had to siren go off in birmingham where i was living at the time and i thought that's the end of the worlds it's happening now and i have to find how can i get my loved ones and i knew i didn't have the time and i really really sympathized with people i know people in hawaii who got that message and wrote under that tweet so i was saying we don't know what to do we can't you know where should we go and it was just. a horrible moment for me because it brought
5:47 am
back actually the reason why i am working on the subject does now. well is there a sense yes ne ne completely agreed nuclear arms are still something that caused people nightmares. still and vitally so i mean every use of a nuclear weapon would be immoral because innocent people would die and in the mollusc a that we know what a of us can conceive but in the age of nuclear deterrence is you are threatening with the use of something in order not to use it this is this is the logic the rational of deterrence so the whole formula saying the more people are threatening each other with the use of something the more likely it is that they go to war is per se not true in itself it can be there threatening in order not to use it in this you just have to have to this is the rest of nuclear deterrence so when
5:48 am
when when the donald trump the president the united states is talking about using any kind of nuclear weapons in let's say north korea his aim is he's talking about in order not to use it. and two to come up with surely his message is actually quite explicit we've got so we've got a relatively unsophisticated or very impetuous u.s. president whose message it seems to me is much more to the iranians to the north koreans we will use nuclear capacities. this is much his message but his message doesn't mean he will use it as much as i give you the message in order not to use it until it's already i'll have sorry i let the rest of the off i don't want to be n.w. but i can't follow. that last forever not somebody with an immoral act in order not to fulfill the act this is the logical photos yes it is yes but it is what i think it is it is work i know not live in florida it is working no since forty five but
5:49 am
please sorry i mean i think you are i think you are climbing up a pole that you will find it very difficult to come down from and i would like to prevent you from doing that. right now we've got a situation that is completely different from the traditional logic of deterrence where you had essentially you know i.c.b.m.'s intermediate range weapons and a small source told that as of tactical nuclear weapons that were carefully set up in such a way as to produce exactly the effect you suggest right now you have people talking about the actual battlefield use of nuclear weapons in ways that well would have been been considered outrageously irresponsible by their predecessors during the cold war and and i don't think i do it is very clear from the things that the president of america has said that he believes nuclear weapons can and should be used and he's not saying it just to threaten people and seize not saying that ho
5:50 am
a little bit because of the way he said it because or because of his own because he looks so serious because of the people who work for him there are tired of this part of it yes that's that's what that's the reason why they're terrified is that they believe. that he believes he would use they should they should exactly so in other words you don't know that i know we're going to know him a contradicts what you've just said no to terence is not supposed to. i'm sorry deterrence is not supposed to terrify the advisors of an american president it's supposed to deter your opponents ok that there is a golden should believe that i'm serious yeah that's what they're doing because you're doing that so it's working no haven't been too much of course i'm sorry look it's this is just not true and i think you know better in fact and it's and i don't want to keep harping on the current american president the two presidents ago dortch w. bush had his advisor work on nuclear a nuclear posture review which also considered the usability of tactical nuclear
5:51 am
weapons in the form of so-called bunk about busters and other and others and this was apt had nothing to do with deterrent as american specialists knew very well at the time so all problem i think is and this is where i think you and i are closer to each other is is that we are seeing a loosening up of the logic of an undermining of the logic of to tyrants which undermines it even for those weapons which are supposed never to be used there are the situations of day recently different we don't we don't have an ideological confrontation as in the cold war we don't have confrontations right no fighting about resources or anything else so it's not it's not the great power competition we're used to face so it's what is letting is the whole rushnell of going to war what the rationale of going to war but not today i mean there is a great color competition all around us. there is really no you know there's no reason you know you can run your nuclear weapon on north korea nothing else and
5:52 am
it's huge insecurity my problem is you know that my problem is not that trump will decide to use a nuclear weapon on north korea my problem is the to provoke possibly the use of nuclear weapons by it's going on by the retarded that is been using and he putting is putting him in a corner also i feel the same way i have to say about russia even if one sees them as being just as aggressive one sees also these corners that they're pushing each other into strew particular kinds of retard but i'd like to go back to what you said before about it's worked for forty five years the fact is that to terence's not kept the the peace in forty five years because there are several instances where it failed and we can say at least one we know of with stand the stuff petrof way he saved the world not to terence because they actually so that. there
5:53 am
was and i know that sorry essex that's absolutely true tell stanislav petroff save the world in i can and can't remember the day in the late ninety's in the moment where he thought that there was a rocket attack coming in a missile attack coming in from the united states and he was absolutely sure that this could not be the case and so he didn't give that up the line of command to for them to make the decision to send them to the right turning out to be a malfunction of the of those of the signal exactly but normally under the logic of your terran convention a lot of they went against his training and said i will make a personal decision here and he decided not to do that and there's several instances where that's happened and we were just lucky point zero point zero zero zero. and i just want to take the conversation a little bit of a different direction you mentioned the countries that have signed up to the un's
5:54 am
nuclear program mission treating what about the countries like the haven't signed up like let's take a china for example let's take russia what kind of leverage does a nobel prize winning organizations like your own have with governments like russia and china well i can is not just looking at two the nine nuclear weapon states which are with only one of these nations that haven't signed up this is i mean the point the point of the treaty is not to single out nuclear weapon states but to say these are the states that don't have nuclear weapons and they feel threatened by those that do and so they want nuclear weapons ban starts that's what's happened with this treaty and the idea is to use this treaty for those states to put pressure on the states that do have nuclear weapons to start negotiations on disarmament and that's that's the whole day they using the idea of building a norm of digital might sing you clear weapons and includes
5:55 am
a terrence in order to get us there because we're stuck in a position at the moment where nothing is happening but modernization and an arms race is starting and so we have to do something very drastic and when you talk about legitimacy yes or no legitimacy or not germany has nuclear weapons on its territory is it right to do so i personally think that there's no reason to have those and even if you were following the logic of the terence i don't see a reason to have those nuclear weapons here if one could use them in fact to signal that no one wants to move away from destruction of nuclear deterrents and the german government has been consistently saying that they're in favor of a nuclear weapon freeworld but i haven't yet seen any concrete i mean look at the that the coalition agreement i haven't seen any concrete ideas in this for how we're going to actually arrive at. any kind of nuclear. music's come up with an obsolete or they're all topic today here on quadriga has been the new arms race
5:56 am
a more dangerous well. thanks for joining us until next time but by the troops. to. cool.
5:57 am
off. disappeared. thousands of people kidnapped tortured and murdered until ninety nine . victims of the guatemalan military dictatorship. loved ones are still fighting to get justice for. their. forgetting. sixteen minutes on d w. e takes
5:58 am
good personally i already with a little bit wonderful people and stories that make the game so special. for all true fans. come. pick up more than football online earth a home worth saving googling to do is tell stories of creative people and innovative projects around the world ideas that protect the climate and boost green energy solutions to inspire people to take action global ideas on g.w. . happy birthday in good shape returning ten this year and you can leave this amazing fitness backpack and if you want to know what's inside is it on the web. to turning the most favorite holmgren's into. coughing who may need
5:59 am
a little bit just to soak for eleven good luck. and why here's. the bench of. a trip by airplane seventeen thousand kilometers in six weeks. breathtaking landscapes the book for getting experience is. touching the story of. all of this is our home is god's country of listening to other better places seventy thousand kilometers through canada starting february twenty seventh subject of. it created movie milestone. was an instrument of propaganda and. persecution. it underwent a bankruptcy and restructuring but it's still turning out films today.
6:00 am
germany's biggest and oldest film company. a cinematic history from the german empire to the present one hundred years. starting february eighteenth. thousands have gathered for a candlelight vigil in parklane florida to mourn the victims of thursday's mass school shooting a nineteen year old former student has been charged with seventeen counts of premeditated murder authorities say he used a legally purchased some my automatic rifle to carry out the attack.


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on