tv This Week With George Stephanopoulos ABC February 5, 2023 8:00am-9:00am PST
you can with wells fargo. (co-worker 4) what are you doing this weekend? >> announcer: "this week" with george stephanopoulos starts right now. >> announcer: "this week" with george stephanopoulos starts right now. sky-high tensions. >> what the heck is that? >> the military shoots down the chinese spy balloon that has been floating across the u.s. for days. >> the balloon has violated u.s. airspace and international law. >> secretary of state antony blinken postpones his trip to beijing, another blow to u.s./china relations. >> the prc's decision to take this action on the eve of my planned visit is detrimental. >> the fallout with senator marco rubio and the chairman of the joint chiefs admiral mike mullen. hiring surge. >> the state of the union and the state of our economy is strong. >> president biden boasts
historic job growth ahead of his state of the union address as biden gears up for re-election. the republican opposition digs in. >> we're not passing a clean debt ceiling. >> everything they've done has been a mess. the record deficit, the record inflation. the record debt. >> the latest with transportation secretary pete buttigieg and new hampshire governor chris sununu. plus, surprising numbers from our new poll and our powerhouse round table. and -- >> do you trust that the water is safe? >> no, i don't. i don't drink it. >> no end in sight for jackson, mississippi's water crisis. rachel scott has a new series, "through the cracks." >> announcer: from abc news, it's "this week." here now, jonathan karl. good morning, and welcome to "this week." with the state of the union address just two days away, we have a new poll showing the steep challenges facing president biden, and some alarming numbers for democrats about the prospects of a
biden/trump rematch, but we begin this morning with the chinese spy balloon shot down yesterday. the balloon first entered american airspace over alaska ten days ago before crossing into canada and then re-entering american airspace in montana on tuesday, spending the rest of the week floating across the mainland of the united states at an altitude of about 60,000 feet. the chinese insisted it was just a weather balloon that had veered off course. the pentagon says it was a sophisticated, high-altitude surveillance system sent by the chinese to spy on the u.s. the balloon's path went above the u.s. nuclear silos and other sensitive sites, sparking a major diplomatic clash between the united states and china and prompting secretary of state blinken to cancel a highly anticipated visit this week to beijing. and late yesterday, an air force f-22 fighter jet fired a single air-to-air missile into the
balloon, bringing it down into the waters off the coast of south carolina where there is now an ongoing effort to retrieve the surveillance equipment it was carrying. there are a lot of unanswered questions this morning about what the chinese were trying to do, and about a second chinese balloon spotted yesterday over south america, and what this means for u.s./china relations. former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, admiral mike mullen, is here to help us, but first we're joined by the vice chairman of the senate intelligence committee, marco rubio. senator rubio, thank you for joining us. we're hearing the reaction from china now to the shooting down of this balloon. their spokesperson has said that this was, of course, simply an accident, a weather balloon that had veered off course, but they said this, for the united states to insist using armed force is clearly an excessive reaction that seriously violates international convention.
china will resolutely defend the legitimate rights and interests of the enterprise involved and retains the right to respond further. so what do you make of that? it sounds like they are threatening or at least suggesting some sort of retaliation for the taking down of this balloon. >> well, i can assure you that if we fly a balloon over china, they're going to shoot it down and probably a lot sooner than we did, but i think there's an important thing to understand. there's intelligence value to what this balloon did. that's why they have them. that's why they've used them, and we'll learn more about that here in the days to come, especially as we're briefed on it, but there's a symbolic issue at play here. this is not a coincidence that this transversed the united states over sensitive military sites leading up to blinken's scheduled visit to china. this is deliberate. they did this on purpose. they understood it was going to be spotted. they knew the u.s. government would have to reveal it to the people that would see it over the sky and the message they were trying to send is,
what they believe internally, and that is what the united states is a once great superpower that's hollowed out, that's in decline, and the message they're trying to send the world is, look. these guys can't even do anything about a balloon flying over u.s. airspace. how can you possibly count on them if something were to happen in the indo-pacific region? you're going to count -- how can can you count on them? if they won't do anything over u.s. airspace, how will they come to the aid of taiwan or stand with the philippines or japan or india when the chinese move on their territory? i think that's really the key part here is they knew exactly what they were doing, and there was a message behind it. >> but the balloon was shot out of the sky. what do you mean? i mean, the balloon was taken down. >> yeah, and i think they understood that ultimately that would probably be what could happen, and then they would make this other statement about, oh, the u.s. is overreacting. it's just a weather balloon. look how silly they got. that's part of it as well, but what they know the world is going to see, you have a balloon that entered through alaska, traversed everywhere from idaho,
montana, across the midwest. over some of the most sensitive -- look at the flight path this thing took. it's not coincidental. it went over icbm fields, some of the most sensitive military sies we have, and then exited the southeast of the seaboard of the united states and into the ocean. there are a lot of questions that need to be answered. when was it spotted? why was it not brought down sooner over other areas? i'm open-minded to listening to the arguments about why wasn't it dealt with sooner, but you asked about china's comments. this is what they wanted the world to see, that they could send a balloon at 60,000 feet over u.s. airspace, over military facilities and we would be unable to stop it and then ultimately when we shoot it down, if we did, they would argue, look how they overreact to a weather balloon, which is obviously not what it is. >> so you are a member of the so-called gang of eight. you're one of the congressional officials that will get briefed first on this. what questions do you want to ask? >> well, i think the intelligence value of it is is always first and foremost in our mind.
what do we believe they collected from it? what is the value of it? it is one of multiple platforms. look, countries spy on countries. china has satellites. china, unfortunately, has embedded in our country all kinds of huawei software and hardware that could potentially be used for espionage. what was the value of this particular platform? it's one we've seen them use for a handful of years here, but what is the value of it? but i think secondarily to it is really an understanding of wat are we going to do about it in the future? i don't believe this is the last time we're going to see this sort of thing happen. again, i don't think this is coincidental. i think they did this on purpose to send a message to the world that they can enter american airspace and do so without us being able to do or willing to do much about it. >> the suggestion that we have heard from pentagon officials is there may actually be more intelligence value that we will glean from this. this was shot down over water. they will hope to recover the payload largely intact. is it possible that we may learn some significant and important things about the way the chinese are operating by retrieving this payload?
>> potentially. it depends what we retrieve. remember, this thing went into th the ocean, so it depends what we retrieve, and the chinese suspected this might happen. look. they flew this thing across the middle of the united states. i imagine whoever designed this thing and put it up there realized, hey, at some point the americans may get their hands on this. it's quite possible that it was designed in a way there wouldn't be much value to us in that regard. but, look, we're going to find out more. those are things that will because if they knew what we gleaned from it, they'll protect themselves from it in the future. those are some of the questions we'll want answered in the days to come, and it also depends what we're able to retrieve. when you shoot something out of the sky and it goes in the ocean, you don't always get it back in a neat package. >> did secretary blinken make the right move to cancel that trip to beijing? >> yeah, i don't know how you could make that trip happen at this point with this thing
happening, but, again, i think these two things were linked and most troubling, and maybe it's not true, i hope it's not true, but there are reports in bloomberg and other outlets that one of the reasons the biden administration did not disclose this balloon earlier to the american public because it did not want to endanger or imperil his ability to travel over there, but certainly i think once this happened, there's no way he could have possibly made this trip at this stage. >> he shot it down when he shot it down based on 9 advice of the military. you don't think he should have ordered it to be shot down earlier against the advice of the joint chiefs, do you? >> well, i think it first begins by understanding when did we first track it over airspace? theoretically if it entered through alaska, norad, it's our system of spotting things protecting both canadian and american airspace, so i would love to hear from military officials about why wasn't it addressed earlier? what were the options at that point? again, look, maybe in a closed session or maybe in the settings with the benefit of hindsight, they'll have real good arguments about why it couldn't be done.
i recognize that you shoot something out of the sky that's the size of three buses and it lands in the wrong place, it could hurt, harm or kill people or damage infrastructure, but by the same token, i think that if that was the case, then i think it would have been helpful for the president of the united states to get on national television and explain to the american people, this is what we're dealing with. this is what i'm going to do about it, and this is why i haven't done it yet. none of that happened, and i don't know why, in effect, they waited so long to tell people about this, and they knew the trajectory that it was on it seems from late last week or early last week. >> we're told, by the way, this happened three times under the previous president, and obviously there were no public notifications there. senator rubio, thank you for joining us. we really appreciate your time. >> thank you. let's bring in admiral mike mullen, the former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. it's been shot down. now what? >> well, i think they'll focus heavily on obviously recovering it. it's in what i understand to be
about 45, 46, 47 feet of water, which is relatively shallow, so i suspect whatever the package is and how intact it is will be recovered, you know, relatively shortly. that's one. secondly, i think strategically this really damages a relationship between us and china, further damages, which was deteriorating, and i think that's really the big part of this. i would, and i think the senator, you know, he keeps talking about they, which i understand, but one of the questions is whether the right hand knew what the left hand was doing inside china, and, quite frankly, not dissimilar to when bob gates was in china about a decade ago visiting. i mean, literally sitting with the president when the pla let -- tested a stealth aircraft, and by all reports hu jintao didn't know anything about it. i think that's a big question.
>> the suggestion is this could have been done by elements within the chinese military to intentionally disrupt this visit by the secretary of state. >> clearly. i think that's the case, and i think to your question about whether blinken did the right thing, i think he absolutely did. there's no way that he could have had a meaningful visit, and we have a host of issues that we need to address. the biden/xi meeting recently was attempting to put a floor on the relationship because things have deteriorated to such a bad point. >> i mean, it seemed to be a warming of relations. >> it was. it seemed to be. we have had staff talks since that time, and clearly this puts a big dent in moving that forward in a constructive way, which we really need to do. >> and we've heard -- it was interesting to hear senator rubio not really go into it again, but we've heard from other republicans and from him before it was brought down, a lot of criticism of president biden for not shooting it down earlier. what do you make of that? >> well, i think -- i mean,
certainly what i have seen in reports is the president made a decision on wednesday to shoot it down, and then basically turned it over to the military to pick the time and place. it's very clear to me that the intelligence value of this from the standpoint of what it was getting was not worth the risk of killing an american on the ground, and it's a substantial package in terms of its size, and even in the least dense areas of the country, there was that possibility, and i know that's why we waited to this point to take it down. >> is it also possible that they wanted to bring it down over water because it would do less damage as it fell to the ground? i mean, we hear about the intelligence value potentially of whatever it was carrying. it landed in water, which is different than landing on the ground. >> yeah. i mean, being able to figure out exactly what's going to happen when you fire a missile into a package like that, that's pretty difficult. i think the overriding concern was not hurting any american people on the ground. >> we hear this has happened before.
there's this other balloon that was spotted just yesterday over south america. while you were chairman, did you -- were you aware of this, the extent of this program? >> this program at least by reports, it's about ten years old. it's a fairly robust program, and as has been said, it's not like spying on each other is a new thing. >> no. >> so to my knowledge, it's the first time, you know, i've seen anything come over the country like this. there's no question. obviously you can't hide it. so to what the senator said, i think there was, you know, whoever launched this thing with deliberate intent, and it doesn't get here instantly. it takes awhile, and i think he asked some good questions about when did we detect it and what were the decisions made? you know, earlier in its flight and i think those will come out, you know, in the next few days. >> there is no way that this was just blown off course. >> no, i don't think so. this is -- >> blown off course just happens
to go over our nuclear -- >> actually, i think i know enough about the system that you actually can navigate this system. it has propellers on it, if you will, so this was not an accident. this was deliberate. it was intelligence, you know, and we need to do two things. we need to sort out all the details of that. more importantly, we need to make sure we can get this relationship moving in the right direction. >> all right. admiral mullen, thank you very much for joining us. >> thanks, jonathan. coming up, as president biden prepares to deliver his state of the union address on tuesday, we'll have the surprising insights from our new poll. plus, pete buttigieg and chris sununu join us live. we're back in 60 seconds.
♪ma ma ma ma♪ [clears throut] for fast sore throat relief, try vicks vapocool drops with two times more menthol per drop*, and the powerful rush of vicks vapors for fast-acting relief you can feel. vicks vapocool drops. fast relief you can feel. think he's posting about all that ancient roman coinage? no. he's making real-time money moves with merrill. so no matter what the market's doing, he's ready. and that's... how you collect coins. your money never stops working for you with merrill, a bank of america company.
we've created more new jobs in two years than any president did in their entire term. we've created more new jobs in two years than any president did in their entire term. the biggest investment in the american infrastructure since eisenhower's administration interstate highway system. our roads, our highways, bridges, ports, airports, clean water systems, high-speed internet, rail, lower health care costs and lower prescription drug prices. so let me ask you a simple question. are you with me? [ cheers and applause ] >> president biden sounding very much like a candidate for re-election at the dnc's annual meeting in philadelphia on friday, but as we mentioned, our new poll this morning with "the washington post" shows significant warning signs for democrats. more than half of the country disapproves of biden's job performance, weighed down by significant discontent over the economy. 40% say they are worse off financially than they were two years ago. the most negative response to that question in nearly 40 years
of our polling, and as biden prepares for a likely 2024 re-election campaign, less than a third of democratic voters want to see him renominated. perhaps most frightening for democrats in a hypothetical rematch of the 2020 election, trump has a slight edge, 48-44 within the margin of error over biden. here to discuss it all is transportation secretary pete buttigieg. thank you for joining us. >> good to be with you. >> mr. secretary, we hear the president's message. i suspect it's what we'll hear on tuesday, basic i that the economy is back on track. how do you make that case when so many americans don't feel it? >> you make that case by pointing to the reality and recognizing that the story won't tell itself. look, what we're seeing is extraordinary. record job creation as the president has pointed out, more created in two years on his watch than four years on any other president's watch, and usually when you have unemployment go down like this,
you have inflation go up, but right now inflation is going down as well. the economic track record in terms of creating manufacturing jobs, in terms of lowering costs like $35 insulin for seniors. we tried to get $35 a month insulin for everybody, and senate republicans blocked us, but the president was able to do it for seniors. accomplishment after accomplishment, and if you look at things like the infrastructure package that i'm working on that was passed in his first year, set up in his second year, it's really in the third and fourth years -- >> those projects get going. >> it takes time to get funded and now we're starting to see the construction phase begin. >> the number that really struck me in our poll was only 16% -- only 16% say that they feel better off today than they were two years ago when biden took office. that's a tough -- that's a tough number to make the case that, hey, happy days are here again. >> look. we have been through a lot, and, you know, the president and the entire administration recognize that there continue to be
headwinds, challenges, problems facing this economy. after all, the president took office under some of the most challenging circumstances facing any president in modern times, but you look at things like the fact that real wages are up, the fact that the number of people participating in the labor force is up. again, something that doesn't always happen when you see those unemployment numbers coming down, and i think we can expect continued improvement if -- if we stay the course of these successful policies, and part of what i think you're going to see on tuesday when the president is addressing the nation and the congress in the state of the union is a reminder that this successful approach stands in stark contrast to a strategy that would focus on things like preserving tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires, looking at cutting social security and medicare, which we're hearing about from a lot of house republicans. kevin mccarthy -- >> that was said it's not on the table. no cuts to social security or medicare, but i want to ask you about these negotiations. are they negotiations over the
debt ceiling? i mean, you have warned that if the united states defaults on its debt, that it's going to cause huge problems for the department of transportation, huge problems for the economy at large. >> yeah. >> how are those negotiations going? can we call them negotiations? >> well, i think the president's been very clear that the full faith and credit of the united states is not negotiable. remember, this is not a decision or a negotiation about how much to spend or even how much to borrow. this is about whether the united states pays its bills, and we always do. we've done this dozens and dozens of times under democratic and republican presidents, and there should be no question that the united states will pay its bills. now i will also say that there are always negotiations going on over the fiscal path of the united states. the president's going to present his budget in about a month, and there's a very natural, healthy push/pull process when it comes to -- >> so you could have the
debt ceiling pass and limit spending and the two don't -- they're kind of simultaneous -- >> one is not appropriate for negotiation. the other one is. but let me also say when it comes to the budget and where we're heading and the economic growth and investments we're making on infrastructure and everything else the president is going to propose, we haven't seen any indication that house republicans are ready to put pen to paper on what they want to see, which is why it's very hard to understand what exactly they're proposing to cut. >> the secret plan to balance the budget. how soon do you expect the president to announce he's running for re-election? >> that's out of my lane and above my pay grade at the same time. what i know is that whether we're talking about -- >> do you want him to run? do you want him to run again? i mean, you saw our poll. you have a large number of democrats that say they don't want him to run again. >> he is an absolutely historically successful president, and i want to see that continue. again, i -- >> you want him to run again? >> look, when i'm appearing in this capacity, i can't talk campaigns and elections, but let me say this, i'm incredibly proud to be part of
this team he has built and to be part of the results that he is delivering. the biggest infrastructure package since eisenhower, the most significant economic achievement -- package since fdr. all, by the way, while having the most -- the slimmest congressional majority of any new democratic president in about 100 years, and, again, we're just two years in. so what he's achieved is extraordinary. when i see tongues wagging about polls and stuff, i can't help but think about, you know, the tongues that were wagging in october. one thing this president has done again and again and again, whether it's politically or policywise is defy expectations and it's one of many reasons why i'm humbled and honored to be part of this team. >> secretary buttigieg, thank you for being here on set. we'll talk to you again soon, i'm sure. >> thank you. >> let's get the republican response from new hampshire governor chris sununu. thank you for joining us. before we get to politics, i got to ask you about the big story over the weekend over this past
week, the chinese spy balloon. did the president make the right call to shoot it down? >> too little, too late. look, at the end of the day they saw this balloon coming. this is all about china poking at us. this is all about china testing the american resolve, whether it's with tiktok or the balloon or whatever the thing is going to be next month, they know that tensions are escalating. they want to see what kind of leadership we have, and, no. the president failed on this one. should have been a lot more transparent, should have taken action a lot sooner and gotten it done. but believe you me, this is not the last we're going to see of china. i know the president wishes that, but it's not. >> the military advice he had was to wait until it was over water. do you think he should have disregarded the military advice? >> there were clearly opportunities to take care of -- take care of the balloon before it finally got over the atlantic. there are reports that they saw it coming in from the pacific, that it was coming in over the forest. that it was coming in over the aleutian islands. there was opportunity to take care of this before it ended up in montana and they realized, oh, gee, we have a problem. so, again, you have to have leadership.
you have to be transparent and you have to be fast-acting. they weren't. they weren't at all. >> so to the president's state of the union address tuesday, what do you want to hear from him? >> look. i'm a free market principled republican. i would love to hear he's focusing on an efficient budget, sending more opportunity back to states, actually believing in locals, believing in individuals and individual liberty, but i know what we're going to hear. we're going to hear him take credit for adding more jobs than ever before. after a pandemic, that wasn't -- that wasn't very hard. he's going to kind of talk about we have unemployment finally coming down and inflation coming down. well, inflation was at a record high. of course, it's coming down. it couldn't have gotten any higher. look, the president is going to do what he does, try to take credit for all of this stuff, but at the end of the day, it doesn't matter about the speech. it matters what's going on around this country, and talking to people. going into a grocery store and just talking to people in the cereal aisle. what are they feeling? do they feel confident about this leadership that the president -- no. your own polls just showed that, right? so at the end of the day, the
best leadership is one that looks inside, says, what are we doing right? what are we doing wrong? right? if we don't acknowledge the problem, we can't fix it. it's what i do as governor and a lot of folks do that and we need to see that in washington. >> there is a turnaround. inflation is down. gas prices are way off, about $1.50 off their high, and you can't ignore that unemployment number, 3.4%, the lowest in decades. i mean, that matters, doesn't it? >> yeah, i turned around from where we were. of course, that was going to turn around, but believe me, we're going to be in three or four years of stagflation. they're pulling $80 billion out of the economy with quantitative tightening, which they should have started two years ago by the way. they're getting their arms wrapped around interest rates and controlling that, which again, they should have done two years earlier. i think janet yellen should have been fired. she played politics knowing what the macro economics were going to be.
you could still get a lot of cash out there in the economy. you're going to have this inflation, and inflation doesn't go down, right? just the monthly number gets better. >> the increase is less. right. >> that's not the way it works. that's right. the prices are not going to go back to where they were, and i know the biden administration likes to pretend that. you just had secretary buttigieg on. they put a trillion dollars into infrastructure and transportation so we can build more roads, but it costs twice as much to build a road. all they did was create an inflationary problem so we didn't have to deal with the inflationary problem at the government level. it's backwards macro economics and we need people to understand this at a real level, not try to take credit at point in time talking points. and, oh, we got down a couple tenth of a percent on unemployment. that's not what this job is about. this job is about creating long-term benefits and long-term structure that we all can drive into. >> it sounds like you're considering running for president. what's the deciding factor going to be for you? >> it sounds like it from this
interview? >> yeah. >> i'm not sure about that. >> it sounds like a message, right? but you're thinking about it. >> the message is new leadership. look, definitely thinking about it, and having those conversations, but at the end of the day, you're going to have a lot of republicans that get in that race. they're all really good people, really good candidates. you have nikki haley and mike pompeo and governor desantis and a lot of them will get in. we have to get into a discussion about where we're going to both as a party and as a country. i'm kind of that live free or die individual liberty. i believe government has to get out of your way, and we've done it really, really well in new hampshire. we're sharing that model across the country. no sales tax, no income tax, most efficient government in the country. all those great statistics. number one in individual liberties. how are we doing it? how does it translate into real world things like mental health, opioids, what's happening with education, right? we all despise and hate this woke cancel culture, but what can we do at a government level but making sure those changes are happening in our
community? >> you saw what our poll said about trump/biden. do you think donald trump can beat biden? >> no. unfortunately, at the end of the day, november of '22 showed us that, right. trump will be seen as a very extreme candidate. the country will push back against it. just look at the results of three months ago, and that shows you where extreme candidates are going to end up falling. it can't get done. he could get the nomination, but he can't get it done, and what i try to espouse to republicans is, look, we want to vote for the most conservative candidate that can win in november and get stuff done in '25. >> okay, governor sununu, thank you for joining us. we appreciate your time. the round table weighs in next. we will be right back. (vo) sail through the heart of historic cities and unforgettable scenery with viking. unpack once and get closer to iconic landmarks, local life and cultural treasures. because when you experience europe on a viking longship, you'll spend less time getting there
and more time being there. viking. exploring the world in comfort. wondering what actually goes into your multivitamin? at new chapter, its' innovation, organic ingredients, and fermentation. fermentation? yes. formulated to help you body really truly absorb the natural goodness. new chapter. wellness, well done. (vo) red lobster's finer points of fun dining: at lobsterfest, whether you're a sea-foodie or a lobster newbie, there's something for everyone. try one of six dishes, like new lobster and shrimp tacos for $17.99. and leave completely lobsessed. welcome to fun dining. (psst psst) ahhhh... with flonase, allergies don't have to be scary spraying flonase daily gives you long-lasting, non-drowsy relief. (psst psst) flonase. all good. dude, what're you doing? i'm protecting my car. that's too much work. weathertech is so much easier...
laser-measured floorliners up here, seat protector and cargoliner back there... nice! out here, side window deflectors... and mud flaps... and the bumpstep, to keep the bumper dent-free. cool! it's the best protection for your vehicle, new or pre-owned. great. but where do i---? order. weathertech.com. sfx: bubblewrap bubble popped sound. if you wake up thinking about the market and want to make the right moves fast... get decision tech from fidelity. [ cellphone vibrates ] you'll get proactive alerts for market events before they happen... and insights on every buy and sell decision. with zero-commission online u.s. stock and etf trades. for smarter trading decisions, get decision tech from fidelity. we all need fiber for our digestive health, but less than 10% of us get enough each day. good thing metamucil gummies are an easy way
to get prebiotic, plant-based fiber. with the same amount of fiber as 2 cups of broccoli. metamucil gummies the easy way to get your daily fiber. wait. you're a night manager and mom and birthday cake baker? so adding “and” student might feel daunting. national university is here to support all your “ands.” national university. supporting the whole you. ♪ ♪ you twist it like this. ahh... ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ the round table is here the round table is here ready to go. we'll be right back. the rou ready to go. we'll be right back concerns are all in our head.
here, we don't think we should pay more than men for the same thing. or pay taxes for period products. here, we can ask tough questions, day or night. and here, we're actually heard. and because of that, we can focus on getting healthier together. together. here, healthier happens together. cvs health. one prilosec otc each morning blocks heartburn all day and all night. prilosec otc reduces excess acid for 24 hours, blocking heartburn before it starts. one pill a day. 24 hours. zero heartburn. your shipping manager left to “find themself.” leaving you lost. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire aah, it's a good day to cough. oh, no!
bye, bye cough. later chest congestion. hello 12 hours of relief. 12 hours!! hmmm, ok. not coughing at yoga? antiquing not coughing? not coughing at the movies?! hashtag still not coughing?! aaah. oww! mucinex dm gives you 12 hours of relief from chest congestion and any type of cough, day or night. it's not cough season. it's always comeback season. i'm amber, i've lost 128 pounds with golo, it'taking release.son. i have literally tried everything. i was on the verge of getting gastric bypass surgery, and i saw the golo commercial, and it was the last thing i tried 'cause it worked. think he's posting about all that ancient roman coinage? no. he's making real-time money moves with merrill. so no matter what the market's doing, he's ready. and that's... how you collect coins. your money never stops working for you with merrill, a bank of america company. for back pain, i've always been a take two and call in the morning guy. but my new doctor recommended salonpas.
without another pill upsetting my stomach, i get powerful, effective and safe relief. salonpas. it's good medicine. want luxury hair repair that doesn't cost $50? pantene's pro-vitamin formula repairs hair. as well as the leading luxury bonding treatment. for softness and resilience, without the price tag. if you know... you know it's pantene. the president had a good first meeting. the president and i had a good first meeting. i shared my perspective with him. he shared his. we walked out saying we would continue the discussion, and i think there is an opportunity here to come to an agreement on both sides. >> start treating each other with respect. that's what kevin and i are going to do. not a joke. we had a good meeting yesterday. i think we got to do it across the board. >> president biden and house speaker kevin mccarthy both
expressing some optimism after their first meeting on the debt ceiling. let's bring in the round table. former dnc chair donna brazile, politico senior political columnist jonathan martin, our senior white house correspondent mary bruce and former new jersey governor chris christie. so, mary, state of the union tuesday. >> mm-hmm. >> i assume this is basically, like, the opening salvo of the re-election campaign. biden is running for re-election, right? >> it certainly seems that way, yeah, and tuesday is a good opportunity for a soft launch. he hasn't made it official, but this is a good chance for him to really outline the argument for him to have another four years. we know what to expect here, right? he's going to argue that the economy is strong based especially off the latest job numbers. he's going to say he deserves credit for that and make the case that he deserves another four years to continue it. the problem is that message hasn't been resonating. right? look at the poll. four in ten americans say that the economy isn't helping out. they feel worse off now than they did when he started and
the poll also shows that americans aren't feeling him. they aren't feeling the effects of any economic growth in their wallet and also they're not enthusiastic about him. that's a real problem. these numbers stand out to me. six in ten americans say they would be disappointed or even angry if he wins again. that is more than the just 56% who have a negative response to trump win. the president has to make a compelling argument and has to be convincing and has to set the stage for why he deserves another four years. >> governor, it's hard to say stay the course when the answer for are you better off now for so many americans is no. >> if you listened to secretary buttigieg, you would have thought we were in the eisenhower economy for god's sake. you know, i mean, look, here's the problem, politicians, when they run for office, you don't always win. sometimes the other guy loses. joe biden's president because donald trump lost. joe biden didn't win, and joe biden's never taken possession of that fact, and so he continues to do what he did when
he was running, which he thinks was great, because i won. no, you didn't win. trump lost, and you can't change who somebody is, jon. in the end, joe biden is not an exciting candidate. he's old, he's boring, and the american people are not relating to him, and that's why those numbers are the way they are. that was the same in 2020 but he was running against someone who was so toxic that he won anyway, but -- >> governor, as long as donald trump is still looming out there on the horizon, democrats are going to be loyal to this president. >> good. >> they perceive the threat of trump as making it sort of imperative that biden is the nominee again to keep trump out of white house, but that leads to the elephant in the room, what happens later in this year if democrats realize this fall that trump is not going to be the nominee of the gop. is there then a, you know, awakening, if you will, about maybe it isn't the best idea to
nominate a president who is underwater and 81 years old? >> let me just say this, the american people wasn't just voting for a man. they were voting for a vision. they were voting for a president who could take them beyond the current toxicity of trump and to a future where a president invests in the american people, invests in jobs, invests in the economy, invests in our infrastructure. that's what they were voting for. you keep discounting the fact that -- >> no, they weren't. >> governor, i give respect to practically everything you say about donald trump, but the one thing you will never say about joe biden was that he was sleeping on the job. he has been working deliberately to help the american people grow this economy. >> that's not what the american people think. >> but, look, the republican party is in a down mood. they're in a funk. i mean, when you look at the numbers today and where the republicans are, they're against anything that joe biden promotes. if joe biden says the sun is coming up tomorrow, the
republicans will say, oh, no, it's not. you're in a down mood. >> donna, in the same way, that's the role of an opposition party. in the same way that the democrats were against everything donald trump out forward -- >> not everything. >> yes, everything. >> not everything. >> everything he was for, they were against. by the way, well, okay, and so -- and republicans voted for the infrastructure bill. we can all find little pieces. but in the end this is -- >> there have been significant bipartisan legislative achievements. >> lots of them. >> i want to get you in on this, donna, our poll, not about democratic leaders who are all with biden, but look at democratic voters. democratic voters, only 31% in our poll want biden to run again. 58% want someone else. now look at the flip side. republican voters, and you see it regarding donald trump, 44% want him to run again. i mean, much closer. how is it that at this point we're at a situation where republicans are more
enthusiastic about a trump re-run than they are a biden re-election? >> because democrats are always thinking about the future, and we're thinking about the future of the country and the future of our political party, and, look, if you go back to last summer, many democrats said, hey. we don't want -- we don't want what we have, but you know what, it's better than the alternative. i recognize that the president will have great challenges, and building back the majority coalition that he assembled in 2020. i do believe that he has the ability to overcome some of these challenges. will it be easy? no, because you've got to bring in this young group of voters, and you know what? they're not looking at what's going on today. they're thinking about their future, and they're looking for someone else. >> jon, at some point there's going to be a democrat who's very ambitious, out there in the ranks of governors or in the congress who looked at this data you're talking about and realizes the political leaders may be all deferential to
president biden, but our voters have a different view. >> you think there may be a challenger? >> boy, there's an opportunity. if, if, if trump fades. this is the key. so much of biden's future hangs on trump because that force field around biden is emboldened by trump. if trump is not the threat this fall that he is seen as today and he is fading, i think democrats are then going to ask questions about biden. why should we nominate biden, but it totally hangs on thump. >> to jonathan's point, so much of it and so much of the democrats' argument, a lot of the argument that's coming out of the biden team on this is that biden is the only one that can beat donald trump, and that's part of the argument for why he should run again and be re-elected again. you look at poll after poll after poll, but those are very close for democrats. to make the argument, which is a lot for them, that biden's the only one who can beat trump and they think that's an argument that extends to people like ron desantis, and if you continue to see numbers that show it that close, i wonder to jonathan's
point, if that changes the calculus. >> it's an argument to say he beat trump. there are only two people in the history of mankind who have run against donald trump in a general election. one won and one lost. >> right, well, look, we got to remember what the 2020 election was like. joe biden didn't -- barely had to leave his basement in wilmington. he didn't have to campaign. i want to ask you, jon. you've covered presidential races. >> you're going to ask me now? >> yeah. i'm asking you -- >> turn of the tables. >> did you see joe biden on air force one doing seven, eight campaign stops a day at 82 years old and being effective? can you imagine how many gaffes there will be in these speeches, how many mistakes, how many outright falsehoods there will be, not because of any other reason than he's making it up. >> i don't know. >> he's not capable of running a traditional american race, and what he had in '20 was a gift. he had donald trump who was toxic, and he had a pandemic, which prevented him from having to go out and speak every day.
>> the only thing democrats will point to are the midterms and the midterms looked good for joe biden. joe biden was out there, not in every state, but he was out there and democrats way outperformed. >> and, look, i recognize because i used to be on those planes going to six and seven events a day. >> sometimes eight and nine. >> well, hell, yeah. but, you know -- i said hellebuyck. sorry about that. the point is joe biden knows how to put together a winning coalition. he did it in 2020, and if he has to do it again, he will. look, ronald reagan announced on october 17th, 1983, all right? >> his re-election. >> irs re-elections. >> when should biden announce do you think? >> he should not announce until late summer, early fall. >> why? >> who's running against him? >> right. >> all he has to do is make the deadlines and get on the ballot. get on the ballot. >> does that sound feasible? wha do you think about when he'll announce?
what are you hearing? >> all they will say is after the state of the union, which does not help to clarify. >> so the fall is after the state of the union. >> the point is, there's no pressure on him to announce now. >> why? >> financially, politically, he could put this off, you know, for months and months and months. >> i want to talk about the other guy, trump, who is right now the only -- >> it rings a bell. >> -- the only announced candidate for president on the republican side, i believe. governor, let me ask, there's been a lot of questions about, you know, potential candidates. would you support trump if he was the nominee? i won't drag you through that again, but i want to play trump's answer to that question. he was asked this week, would you support the nominee regardless of who it is? this is what he said. >> my question to you, mr. president, if you are not the nominee, will you support whoever the gop nominee is? >> it would depend. i would give you the same answer i gave in 2016. it would have to depend on who the nominee was. >> i mean, this is as the rnc is going around saying that as a
condition to get into the debates, all candidates will have to say that they have promised to support the nominee. i mean -- >> it tells you one of two things, right? it tells you that trump is aware of that and is making a conscious decision, it says he doesn't want to be on the stage. >> do you think that's the case? >> i think it might be because i think he knows that debates this time will be much, much different than they were in 2016. >> because he has the record to answer for. >> that's exactly right. also, look, if you are a candidate and the rnc is saying that to you, you say, yeah, when everybody else agrees, when everybody says yes, i'll say yes, but i would say this, you would be dumb as a republican candidate for president in my view if you say, yeah, i'll support the nominee no matter who it is, but donald trump who is the front-runner says, i won't necessarily do that. well, hell, man, when the front-runner says he'll support the nominee, then count me in. until then, forget it. >> you had a very interesting article this week saying that, you know, talking about how slow
republicans are to come out to jump. nikki haley, we'll probably hear from in a couple of weeks. what's going on? >> well, jon, i'm so struck by the slowness that the field is developing, but i think this is going to be a smaller field than we've seen in past gop races. i think there's a couple reasons for that. one is just dealing with trump is a hassle. you played the clip there. will he or won't he endorse the nomination? i think for a generation of senators especially in their 40s and 50s, just sit it down and see what happens down the road. i think in part it's a desantis issue. he appears to be a strong trump alternative. he's constantly baiting the left which helps the right, and with donors especially, that can suck a lot of oxygen out of the room, and it is just a money question. there's only going to be so much money available for gop candidates this time around because they're not going to want to burn cash on somebody that they think will prolong this race. they're desperate to find a trump alternative and fast. >> i wore red today to represent
your side of the aisle, chris. >> our heart is warmed by that. >> you got your blue tie on so i love the compliments here, but here's the thing, donald trump ran as an insurgent in 2016. there's a lot of power when you are an insurgent. there's no power when you are not an insurgent. he is the incumbent, and he is going to have to continue to go out there and get endorsements, supporters, and raise some money. the republicans will have a large field because you have a lot of governors, and you have a lot of other talent that's been sitting on the sideline, and they're going to take on donald trump. it's going to be an interesting primary season, jonathan. trump is still the front-runner. >> can trump beat biden? >> i don't think so. >> and what do you make of sununu? >> listen, i know chris really well. i've known him for 15 years. i mean, listen, everybody is playing around with the idea of, will i run or won't i run?
i think the reason it's developing slowly, jon, is nobody sees any imperative to do it. who wants to be the first in the pool with donald trump when he has no one else to shoot at and his whole life is about shooting at people? you know, why do you want to necessarily be the first in the pool to do that? secondly, there's no push right now from any other outside forces to say, you must make a decision tomorrow. so when there isn't, there's no reason to begin -- listen, i have been through this. it is a long, difficult process. to the extent you can make it shorter, that's good. >> 17 candidates in 2016 filed, i think, for the ballot in south carolina. i think this time around we'll see seven to nine do that. here's one date to watch. that's this summer, the rnc summer meeting in milwaukee. they're going to have a debate. so i think that's the one -- >> who's going to be in that debate? >> that'll get candidates in the race this summer to be on that stage. >> whether or not donald trump will be on that stage --
>> or chris christie. >> or chris christie. we are out of time. thank you very much to the round table. coming up, a first look at a new abc series that follows the money of federal programs and the communities that slips through the cracks. stay with us. . follows the money for federal programs and what slips through the cracks. gs worth of transactions against thousands of compliance controls with the help of ai. now you're making smarter decisions faster. operating costs are lower. and everyone from your auditors to your bankers feels like a million bucks. let's create smarter ways of putting your data to work. ibm. let's create mass general brigham -- when you need some of the brightest minds in medic this is a leading healthcare system with five nationally ranked hospitals, including two world-renowned academic medical centers. in boston, where biotech innovates daily
and our doctors teach at harvard medical school and the physicians doing the world-changing research are the ones providing care. ♪ there's only one mass general brigham. wondering what actually goes into your multivitamin? at new chapter, its' innovation, organic ingredients, and fermentation. fermentation? yes. formulated to help you body really truly absorb the natural goodness. new chapter. wellness, well done. ladies... welcome to my digestive system. when your gut and vaginal bacteria are off balance. you may feel it. but just one align women's probiotic daily helps soothe digestive upsets. and support vaginal health. welcome to an align gut.
face, mouth, tongue, or trouble breathing. infections that can cause shingles have occurred. don't stop steroids unless told by your doctor. tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection. may cause headache, injection site reactions, back pain, and fatigue. ask your asthma specialist about a nunormal with nucala. think he's posting about all that ancient roman coinage? no. he's making real-time money moves with merrill. so no matter what the market's doing, he's ready. and that's... how you collect coins. your money never stops working for you with merrill, a bank of america company. do you struggle with occasional nerve aches your money never stops working for you with merrill, in your hands or feet? try nervivenerve relief from the world's #1 selling nerve care company. nervive contains alpha lipoic acid to relieve occasional nerve aches, weakness and discomfort. try nervivenerve relief. safe, drinkable, reliable, sustainable, and an equitable water treatment facility is a much longer road ahead. as i have always warned, you
know, even when the pressure is restored, and even when we're not under a boil water notice, it's not a matter of if these systems will will, but when these systems will fail. >> the mayor of jackson, mississippi, on "this week" last year after 150,000 residents had been under a boil water notice for more than a month. five months later, many are still without access to safe, clean tap water. senior congressional correspondent rachel scott follows up on efforts to fix jackson's water system in her new series "through the cracks." >> reporter: ted was appointed by a federal judge to try to fix the water crisis in jackson. had he's only been on the job for a few months, but the problem goes back decades. the city's crumbling water plant is in desperate need of repair. >> this is really a failed system from an infrastructure standpoint. >> reporter: he took us inside the water plant giving our cameras exclusive access at the
main treatment water facility. this is the start of what every jackson resident wants. >> every day. >> clean, safe drinking water. >> we have been really good at producing it. unfortunately, had these gaps where you can't keep the pressure up because it's full of leaks, can't get the full production because we're missing critical parts. all those things contribute to these episodes where we have had these disasters. >> reporter: the condition of that water treatment plant is felt by jackson residents like glenda barner. do you trust this water? >> i don't. i don't drink it. i have not drank jackson city water in years. still washing my cabbage. >> reporter: the grandmother of seven often has to prepare meals for her entire family just using bottled water. >> and i think about it not just for myself, but as a city. we shouldn't have to go through this. we really shouldn't. >> reporter: in 2022, mississippi received $429 million from the bipartisan infrastructure bill to address water infrastructure directly. we asked the mayor for an update. >> none of the money has been
allocated at this time, and the application process has not been released by the state. >> reporter: but there was an application process. abc news has learned leaders in jackson did not apply last year for any of that funding and only recently applied in 2023. >> you depend on your city, your federal, and your state government to help you in times like this, but they're having in-fighting over the politics of it. you know, they say they're allocating money. where's the money? who's spending the money? what's the money being spent on? >> reporter: even without the money from the infrastructure bill, the city of jackson is still receiving more than $800 million of federal funds. some of that from epa grants, the american rescue plan in congress. hennefin is in charge of where that goes. in a new plan obtained by abc news, he's laid out how they intend to address the water system issue and address leaks, but it'll take time. the plan spans 20 years. though some improvements will be seen in the first five.
what do you tell residents when you hear from them about their frustrations, especially those that are losing patience? >> a little bit more patience, maybe, which is hard to ask. they've suffered. it's been terrible. >> thanks to rachel for that. her full report airs tomorrow on abc newslive prime with linsey davis. we'll be right back. news live,y davis. we'll be right back. what if a mouse could change the world? if elephants could fly.
if a princess could look like me. if stories could come to life. if i could watch heroes save the day... ...and become a hero myself. what if there could be a huge party... ...with my friend mickey? here, now, is where 100 years of disney dreams come to life at the disneyland resort. that's all for today. thank you for sharing part of that's all for today. thank you for sharing part of your sunday with us, and tune in tuesday night at 9:00 p.m. i'll be joining david muir and our entire political team for live coverage of president biden's state of the union and the republican response. have a great day.
IN COLLECTIONSKGO (ABC) Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News Archive
Uploaded by TV Archive on