tv Charlie Rose PBS September 6, 2012 12:00pm-1:00pm PDT
>> charlie:welcome to the program tonight from charlotte, north carolina, the site of the democratic national convention he. we begin this evening request jack lew. ''s the chief of staff for president obama. >> different styles president obama will tend to come in a quite tight lawyerly way. president clinton likes to hear more of the discussion, to think things through. they end up in the same place in the sense they have gotten out of the people that work for them everything they know and they're making the decision based on fact and. >> we condition request john podesta former chief of staff for president clinton and director of transition. >> what's really critical is for him to frame the choice about what this election is about. 2 very, very different view tion and approaches to the us economy. he's got credibility about what
works and what doesn't. i think he can remind people about what has worked for them in the past and set a path for the future. so i think one of the things that he will do is spend his time talking about the challenges that president obama faced, the way he responded to them, why those were the right choices. >> charlie:we conclude with jeff sell any of the new york times and john harris of politico. >> i think they're worried about what's going 0 happen friday morning. 9 hours after he finishes giving hi acceptance speech the latest job reports come out. 3 jobs reports will come out before elects day. they're worried about the economy sort of getting away from them and them not being able to sort of keep this race stable. >> charlie:leu podesta, al hunt, john harris and jeff disel any when we continue.
provided by these funders: >> ch: captioning sponsored by rose communications from our studios in new york city, this is charlie rose. >> charlie:we continue our coverage this evening of the democratic national convention in charlotte, north carolina. former president bill clinton commanded the spotlight as he formally put president obamas's name into nomination. central role marked a milestone in the interkrat and evolving relationship. the two have swroafer come the past to fortunately an
unexpected alliance over the four years. economic growth and balance budget. the owe bam in a contend for convention speakers to dispel any doubt is best suit today bring prosperity to the middle class. but as robert you stuart lewis stevens said all speech written or spoken is a dead language until it finds a. >> enduring pessimism complicates the democrats argument better off mow than 4 years ago. new economic data to be released this week makes it unlikely that the unemployment rate will fall in the 9 weeks until the 9 election. jack lew joins me. he speaks to us tonight personal capacity representing the campaign. also with us al hunt. he is my partner for this evening. i'm pleased to have him always.
good to have you back at may table even though it's different than the normal. it's normally at night not during the day. having said that, tell me what it is that you think is the principle argument that the obama administration has to suggest they ought to be re-elected. >> charlie i think the central argument has to do with our vision of the future vs. theirs. the president's record is strong and his vision of the future is one that builds as we say so many times from the middle out. there was the view of going back to tired and broken economic policies from the top down that didn't work, won't work again and aren't good for the economy or working americans. i think we have a pretty central kind of decision for the country to make, which way to we want to go? do we want to go back to economic policies that didn't work and weren't fair. >> charlie:so when we say that, what are we talking about?
what specific do you think mr. range of motion nip is suggesting and mr. is suggesting that will not work and make the country worse rather than better? >> let's start with the budget and physical policies. we know we have challenges to deal with. we recognize we have a serious budget gap to close. look at the way the two sides have proposed doing it. president's plan is balanced plan, everything on the table. a little bit from everyone. uncomfortable but things we can do. their plan is take taxes off the table, don't say that taxes aren't going to be used to reduce the deficit, can you believe down and do $5 trillion of tax cuts to benefit people most wealthy. you take a terrible economic problem and make it much ors. your first adding $5 trillion of new debt before closing the old gap. where are you going to solve
that? how are you going to solve what is already a 4 trillion i don't know dollar problem with another 5 trillion-dollar headache. they can eliminate things, education, research and development. that's are things central to our economic future. >> charlie:here is my question to both of you. the white house is the bullet pulpit, the president has talked about the immediate to explain. ronald reagan would go over the heads of congress to the american people. has the president used that bull pit and if what he says is so much better than what the republicans wanted, why couldn't he get the country's support to overrule the republicans in the house? >> i think the president has been using the bully pulpit. if you look at where we were a year ago, we were in a place where the republicans didn't want to do anything. we put a jobs bill out there had the, a couple more million jobs would have been a good thing for
the country. they did extend the payroll tax cut. they did take action without which we would have bad economic conditions. we did that by going to the american people. we do go to the american people. we will continue to do so. this campaign is about going to the american people. we had an election in 20 he 10 where the balanced power in congress changed. there was a thard eng of positions. there was not any secret the policy of the republicans at that time was to deny the president a second term and block any effort he had to move the country in the right direction. we worked our hearts out trying to reach an agreement. we tried really hard last summer. we came close. they weren't ready to do it. we went out after labor day last year, we're going to go to the american people. this campaign is going to be in the position who is going to make the tee significants going forward. two very different visions how
to run this country and where to go. >> charlie:when you hear that, does that reflect the washington you know? >> it does. i think jack critiques the romney problem very well. i would say, however, that i don't think today that the president has done a very effective job of telling people where he wants to go including some things he has done health care for instance. he enacted this hugely important health care bill. the time the argument got before the supreme court i don't know if the court reads the election returns or not polarity of people thought it was a bad idea. if you look at the speeches last night you saw a series he of very clear presentations that make the case why health care reform was important. you're going to hear more of that tonight. >> jack, i told charlie erl yir i thought the first lady's one the best. i thought was a great speech. i don't think it addressed that issue nor was that her purpose
why the next couple years will be different than the last couple. >> i beg to differ in the sense, want appeal the affordable care act. everything the first lady was talking about. they will be materially changed if the health care is reformed one question you were asking with making the case about health care reform. it was abstract when it was passed. the american poem heard of it as a title, it was an idea. it's now real. >> charlie:but at the same time as you know, in terms of explaining things and in terms of making an argument that resonates, reason cans have made an argument that seems to resonate. when you look at polls and how people see the health care reform, that it's an overreach by government. >> that caringment is made by some of our critics. when i talk to people about healthcare reform, they start out with a soft idea what it's about. when you ask them how do they
feel about having the doughnut hole they used to have spend $600 on their prescription drugs if they were on medicare going away, they feel strongly. they don't want to lose that. a parent whose child did not have health insurance go back to paying 5 or $10,000 a year. they feel good having. a parent with a child with a preexisting condition, they feel the same way are. >> charlie:referendum on the health care reform passed by the congress, you would be ready to accept that resolve if it was just a referendum on health care? >> i don't think this health care will be a referendum. if you look at the president's record starting in january, 2009, inherited an economy in free fall. he stopped that. dug up. created 4 1/2 million jobs. now on a path where it is not yet where it needs to go but in the right direction.
if people have increasing confidence with a little patience it will get there. we believe very strongly that health care reform is part of that, part of the security that american families deserve not just health care reform, the whole package. >> charlie:bill clinton says we left him a -- we left a total mess, he hasn't finished cleaning it up. so far -- put us back in [laughing] >> can't disagree with much of that. >> charlie:if you read that you would know where it came fr. continuing he said the most important question what kind of country do you want to live in. year on your own winner take all society, you should support the republican ticket. if you want a country of spared prosperity and share responsibility, we're all in this together society, you should vote for barack obama and joe biden. that's pure bill clinton. is it fair in your judgment to the argument made by the the republicans and mitt romney that they want a society which is
winner take all rather than shared prosperity and shared responsibility because one of the arguments that came out of that convention was a sense ever community? >> i think if you look at the policies that the romney-ryan ticket has supported, it is. >> winner take all? >> a policy that doesn't leave a lot for people on their way up. it's very hard on students starting in preschool and elementary school going to college. where is the support that all of us got when we were getting our chance? we're going to deny that to the next generation? it's not fair to senior citizens, medicare into a voucher program. that's not the right thing. we go back to where we were in 1964. >> that's not 4 currency years. >> the idea that there's this magic line when before people can't afford it, the day after they can afford it, i don't buy that. i don't think somebody who is a day younger or a day older is
all that different. if the principle is on their own they should bear the risk. that's an important principle. that's the idea behind their medicare proposal. i don't think it's an overstatement. if you combine that with their tax policy which is generous for people who are wealthy. why would they do that, need to have massive kurts in things that help young people their education, senior citizens with their health care to pay for tax cuts we don't need. when bill clinton was president we had tax rates we think we should go back. >> charlie:if you eliminate bush -- just eliminating the tax just that go back to the bill clinton rate. >> correct. >> charlie:let me change tt idea of the president. you work closely ily with him. you're right there policy and politics meet in the oval office. what do you now know about him that you did not know before? >> that's an interesting question. there's probably a lot of things
that fall into that category. i would have to say having the job more often the things i have to bring in are hard. if they're easy they don't come to me. if i can take care of them, -- the job of chief of staff frequently go in with choices you wish you would better options. the way he looks at hard choices an makings clear-headed decisions is everyday impressive to me. it's a tribute to his intellectual integrity, personal integrity. if i went in and the bearer of bad news had to take responsibility for the choices, it would make not just the job harder but making decisions a lot harder. >> i've known jack lew for almost 40 years. there is no better public citizen, no better dedicated policy person in america than jack lew and a number of republicans would disagree. he has been a top aid to bill clinton. hilary's most important i think
advisor at the state department. that's a remarkable record. jack sometimes i disagree with you but boy you are an incredible citizen. >> charlie:howl do you smain that? how have you seen that in terms of all those roles you have had culminating in chief of staff and maybe notice next if obama is re-elected cabinet -- >> i have had the real privilege to work for some of the great people of our age. >> charlie:but what's the secret to that? what's the secret to be able to work with that many people of different personalities? start with tip o'neal. >> i was going to add the speaker. i grew up in his office. some things i learned in his office you i have never forgotten. treat everybody with respect. take seriously the analysis before the politics. think thank you the problem and make choices based on having done your analysis and you let all points of view be heard and
presented. you don't try to preclude one or another idea. >> charlie:how is barack obama different from bill clinton? >> they're very different people. what's similar is more striking than what's different about them. they are both men who are driven by an intense passion to move this country in the right direction, an intellectual curiosity and capability you're always at the edge of your nonl. they ask that question that gets right to the limit. that's how they think. they are hard-thinking inquisitive men. they have different personal styles. president obama will tend to come in a quite tight lawyerly way, president clinton like to say hear more of the discussion to think things through. they end up in the same place. they have gotten out of the people that work with them and for them everything they know and they're making the tee significant based on fact and analysis which is a distinction
from other administration. >> charlie:what is the question you most wish you knew about barack obama. >> i think it's a very good question, charlie. if the president is re-elected jack was the chief budget tboarkt tor in the '90s for pill clinton and barack obama now. if the president is re-elected which 2 or 3 republicans would you first turn to try to have serious conversations? >> i'm not going to jump ahead of the -- >> i tried though. >> i think that the truth is that everyone knows there's going to have a hard serious conversation. we're he going to have to go beyond the point where one side no taxes are on the table. we are going to have make concessions. that's clear all along. >> charlie:do you think the conversation would have been better served if you had been prepared, you and the president to go the country and say this is what we really believe about
entitlements. this is how we see what they need the country, this is what they mean to the economy for et better or worse and this is how they have to be changed. >> i think that's a little bit unfair. it is true that we have not put out a budget that says or a policy proposal that says, we're just going to concede to the other side. >> right. >> we did put in our budget some tough poll is, change in medicare and medicaid cut back on programs important to me, important to many democrats. you haven't seen the republicans take a similar move on taxes. all the calls for the administration to put a more clear vision out ignore what we have already put out. it's saying we want to know what your bottom line s i negotiated. >> you don't start with your bottom line. >> but sometimes don't you have to take a risk in order to get a solution? if both sides say, i'm not going
to show you my hand because i can't get to the solution, you end up where we are. >> we have presented very clear principles on social security, we have presented very clear principles on medicare and the idea that we have to preserve medicare as we know it and social security as we know it, are deep principles we have articulated. i personally spent 30 plus years speak to go why those are important principles. that doesn't mean we said no changes in medicare. >> charlie:how about social security? >> social security if you look at the budget the president put out he put principles that should guide us. i have seen a lot of discussions of social security that went nowhere. the only time it actually got to a successful end is when people didn't come and put their specific policies out. >> why did it fail time after time? why couldn't you get past the point -- >> it failed because in the end i don't think the other side was ready to move at all on taxes. i really believe that.
if they had been prepared to have reasonable balance between revenues and spending we have been avoided a lot of economic problems. in the end that's what a balanced plan will involve. involve revenues, entitlement cuts. we have already done and. >> charlie:and you believe it will be different if the president is re-elected because -- >> elections matter. the president will be in a position to drive this process forward. congress will get a message. there have been a lot of discussion about the fist clat clift. i have think the reality is congress has a challenge making hard decisons when there aren't consequences. >> the answer al to the question i ask you what i would most want to know when he considers the possibility he may very well be re-elected, what is it he feels he will be unrestrained to do? how does he think about this? i mean, how does he look at what will be the political realities?
in terms of where i think i can take this country that i could not before? >> i think he's laid out a pretty clear vig and he will tomorrow night further. i think his ideas are clear, his beliefs are clear. >> are they big ideas? >> building an economy that will last, that will create manufacturing jobs for the future. technological base to be the world's leading, driving force to be competitive in fields we run the risk of falling behind in. that doesn't happen by accident. it happens by having the best educated workforce, best research and development. these are. >> charlie:thank you. another time i would love to have you come and tell us what your day is like. you're the person that the president depends on to guyed him through the day. what is that about? >> charlie one thing i will say the day is less colorful than
his president excess or ram emanuel. >> my job was not to create color but manage a white house that doesn't stop any day even when the president. >> charlie:maybe that says something about the evolution of barack obama in the white house. >> charlie:thank you. >> charlie:we continue this even with john poa did he say tow chief of staff transition team 4 years ago. currently the chair of center for american progress. al hunt yoins you for this discussion as well as a number of others as we explore what is happening to the democrats in charlotte. so welcome to both of you. it's great to have you here. we congratulated mr. hunt last night. >> 40 years in 0 covering conventions. a number of people thought it was my birthday so i accepted congratulations for my frt birth at a. >> charlie:what i want to know what was your age the first
convention. >> i was 29. >> charlie:40 years ago, was it. >> yes it was. >> i got you beat. >> charlie:how has it changed? >> well, it's changed first of all in the media. in the old days television covered it gavel to gavel. in one of two there was some suspense going in 1966 you didn't know if ford or reagan was going to win. wasn't tightly scripted as they are now. i still love it. this is a gathering of mitt co-s all over the america. >> plumbers with have their convention. >> exactly why shouldn't politicians. you meet interesting people. i'm sure they can trade notes. a state rep from oregon and alabama have interesting things to talk about. >> charlie:john what do you get out of tis. >> i have al beat mother of all conventions 1968 chicago convention. >> that's where i started runner
for new york times driving a car back and forth. >> predictable results '72 wasn't much better with mcgovern 2:38 a.m. >> let's start with this idea. you have seen bill clinton today. >> yeah. >> charlie:what's it like to watch him prepare a speech and how does he approach this process. >> i think he's been thinking about it for a very long time, reading a lot thinking about what he needs to do. i think he's -- he prepared a draft of his speech and he's working on it through the day. >> charlie:he wrote it himself? >> yes. >> charlie:did he start with someone else's and add to it. >> wrote it himself. working with a few of his advisors try to trim it and make heur it gets close to the time allotted for the. >> charlie:between the time start to trim and end up with
teleprompter. >> i remember i was with him in 2004, we were editing speeches, driving from the hotel he was saying in cambridge to boston gardens in boston with his now key aid justin sit you go on the back of the suv with computer on his lap way back of the suv doing the changes. but he gave one of the great speeches at that convention. i think tonight he's going to thrifer a really great performance -- >> charlie:by the time my audience sees this he will have made that. we're typing in the after it is noon so i can be at the speech. what is it important for him to do? >> what's really critical is for him to frame the choice about what this election is about, two very, very different views and approaches to the us economy.
he has credibility about what works and what doesn't. i think he can remind people about what has worked for them in the past and set a path for the future. i think one of the things he will do is spend his time talking about the challenges that president obama faced, the way he responded to them, why those were the right choices for the american people and why we need to stick with an economic program that builds on again what he tried to do in office with success and i think what president obama is trying to do equally. we haven't felt it as much as we need to but i think it will build success. >> charlie, let's think about four years ago today. 4 years ago today bill clinton was a con troa verse yal and i would say somewhat discredited figure within the democratic party. difficult primary struggle between barack obama and hillary clinton.
there was really animosity between the obama camp and clinton camp and he was not a happy person at that time, at least he wasn't meap politically. you talk about resilience. you talk about -- i mean this is remarkable. he really was down and four years later he is critical, he's a validate tor for barack obama. let's go back tor where i was. republicans weren't quite as generous in the '90s in their support for bill clinton nowl saying let's go back to the clinton years. >> one thing i disagree i don't think he was discredited. remember when he came into the hall in denver, i think the democratic party enl e embraced him. they remembered he had been successful two term president brought the democratic party back, created a strategy that eliminated some of the problems that the democratic party had
can -- 1980s and i think they embraced him. there was obviously tension and sore feelings between the obama and the -- >> charlie:i think you're right. >> it was an unhappy time for him freur years ago. a moment of great triumph. >> important for the united states was elect barack obama. >> charlie:how would you define the relationship other than they need each other. >> i think they have genuine respect for each other. they talk more than you think. i think that was a process that built up after what was a contentious set of primaries. but i think from the moment that president obama got into office, president clinton really tried to do his best to support him when they reached out he always helped. >> charlie:that's not necessarily the story you hear, john. people say that the president has said -- former president he got more phone calls from george
bush than he did from barack obama in the first year or 2. >> i think if you asked him that question today he would say they have a very serious, respectful relationship and they talk and they. >> charlie:but the point is what people around him say and people who know his thoughts said. >> a lot of people like to trade in that kind of gossip. but i know the reality. the reality is, you know, barack obama picked hillary clinton to be secretary of state of the united states. she has done a wonderful job. president clinton respects that relationship between secretary clinton and the president and i think they've warmed up to each other. they not only get along but i think they really do share ideas and try to talk about strategies. >> charlie:do you think if hillary clinton had been in the senate tanned not joined the obama administration that she might have considered challenging him? >> no.
i don't think there was room in the party in 20 wurn 2 to challenge him. saw nothing develop in that way. it was not like 1980 where democrats felt that a wide swath of democrats felt hike we had to change horses. that wasn't true this time. there was some tis appoint by some elements of the party. early on obama rallied hem beginning last fall and through the course of the spring and i think you see the entheuz yasm in the convention hall. compare it to has you saul in tampa for governor romney where you would think they would come in pumped up thinking they could win this thing and that was the flattest convention i witnessed. >> charlie:is there strategy if he wins re-election ma yort make it work this time that he could not make it work. ram emmanuel said at election
results will change dynamics. >> i think that's right. mandate you get will change things the with the fighting gingrich congress shutting the government down. budget framework teal in 1997 after the president was re-elected. there's something else at issue this year that wasn't true in that period under clinton, which is that you have all these expiration tion of the tax cuts, sequester, et cetera gives the president enormous power because the outcome of the just say no strategy of the house republicans to do anything to try to defeat him results in a an outcome they don't want, which is tax cuts going up across the board. i might argue that what that would be would be restoration to the clinton tax code which was pretty good in the beginning. in the short term that will be a major hit on the us economy and something they don't want.
deep cuts in defense which they claim not to want although they voted in august of 2011. i think they don't want that outcome. they're in a very different position than 2011. they're going to have to negotiate with him. he has the upper hand and leverage. >> charlie:how will people define this election as they leave these conventions. >> i think this has been a good convention so far for the democrats. i expect barack obama will have a good speech thursday night. the country is evenly divided. stronger democratic candidate. maybe a slight edge to obama that way until november 6. i want to pick up on what john said. model of 1996 is an interesting one. i think it was a different republican party even than it was 16 years ago which complicates the matter the on obama's part if he should be re-elected, he has to reach out
more. roosevelt had he was re-elected in 1940, granted he was going into a war, brought republicans into that cabinet. he have has got to put together a cabinet base of the democratic party is going to be a little bit edgy about. >> charlie:why didn't he do that in the first term, john. >> he made some choices. he kept gaits in secretary of defense for. >> charlie:he pt. >> he tried to get jed greg. >> secretary of the army was republican. he tried to do that. he tried to get jud greg. i don't know if ron is still taking credit for that. >> a thousand feet fathers --sk. i think he tried -- he tried to put together balance in the cabinet. i think one of the things that happened with the result of the -- some people kind of falling by the wayside during the course
of the con fir may go process was we did end up people with not strong business experience in the cabinet. and i think he's tried to rectify that. >> charlie:that was a no-brainer at the time. >> a no-brainer to do that? >> charlie:yeah. >> i think he was looking for the best people who could solve what was really. >> charlie:he has such a resounding victory and a whole range of people could have chosen. he knew a lot of people well judged in the business community. >> yeah. >> charlie:so -- >> lousy transiks director. >> i blame it all on that.charlu have and your experience as transition director, what would you do differently? >> well, i think that when we were preparing for the transition, we ksh and i think really if you look at it from the outgoing administration's
perspective as well, in the early part of that process, the focus was on to some extent the transition with wars in iraq and afghanistan. we quickly got on to the economy. the process of building the work for building the recovery act was monumental and it occurred quite rapidly and i think the one question that i still wrestle with in my mind is, did -- we were in the process of doing a lot of different things and the repeat idaholy with which the recovery act went through and sort of getting away from it i think didn't really help educate the public about what they were likely to experience and what the story line and narrative was. so we kind of -- the
administration kind of moved on quickly to other priorities which we had prepared in the administration particularly the health care. in retrospect we didn't have good answers to the housing crisis and we didn't stay on that economic argument about job creation long enough really. >> charlie:back in a moment. stay with us krsmght we continuel analysis. john harris of politico and jeff disel any of the new york times. i'm meesed to of them here. where are we in terms of democratic party having a remarkable speech by the first lady and also mayor castro, bill clinton will speak tonight before we do this. we can expect him to do what he always does, to lay out the choices and make the case for barack obama and tomorrow night the president speaks.
someone said today if the rest of this convention as successful as the first lady's speech, the democrats come out of this on the march. >> that make sense to you? >> it does within limits. let's face it, there's really only two speeches sat these conventions that matter a lot, the nominee speeches. keynote addresses are useful. bill clinton is going to be entertaining probably helpful in making the kales. this is obama's convention. i do think it has been effective tort democrats they are only giving their answer to the charge we have been heard again and again speakers in tam tampa. president obama gaf you didn't build t his point was everybody we built this together any successful person is successful because it's in the context of opportunity.
republicans hammered him on that. i think what we're hearing from the first lady, from mayor castro. we're going to hear it from bill clinton they're answer. we believe in success, we also believe in prosperity, we are in favor of everybody getting rich but rerve has to together krrchght someone that was in the first lady's speech, if we are lucky and successful by hard work -- >> all these have been out there have been more owe fecttive than president obama often is in making this case. i think he often falls into language that sets him up for this character that really he is hostile to free enterprise, not in favor of success or people having the opportunity to get rich. that's a widespread belief in the republican party, widespread belief of many businessment those who backed him in 2008.
bill clinton never really faced that. he had a different language a-different way of making arguments that allowed him to favor progressive policies but not be seen as hostile to private success. >> charlie:why do you think that is, jim, if you agree with it. >> i'm not sure he's hostiles''s perfect soafd. if you talk to business people even those who supported him in 2008 and there is a long roster of people who gave money to him, inspired by him in 208 now are not with him, they think his background does not have anything in it that comes from the entrepreneurial side. he's largely been in the academic world and government world. i'm not sure he is as antibusiness but allowed himself to be branded like that. one thing that's interesting about former president bill clinton i think john is absolutely right.
he just has never had to face anything like that. he's able to -- his argument about the middle class is probably going to be the most effective sales pitch that this president can use for the next 60 days. if he was ahead or if he was sort of comfortable in this race, i don't think we would see bill clinton in such a marqued position. his argument he says it better than anyone else and aagree with john also. i think the first lady's speech was tw good as any like that could be. the hall absolutely loved t i think the president's speech on thursday night is really the only one that matters here. something would have to go terribly wrong with president clintons for it. >> charlie:what are the obama people including the president and his campaign staff in chicago worried about? what is their fear at the end of the day? >> i think they're worried about what's going to happen friday morning. 9 hours after he finishes giving
his acceptance speech, the latest job report comes out. there are things outside their immediate control that's one of them the three jobs reports that come out before election day. they're worried about the economy getting away from them and them not being able to keep this race stable. their main plan from here to the next 60 days is to cope things as stable as possible, keep hammering mitt romney on trying to win over this middle class argument. but if there's bad jobs report no. on friday, if things get worse in that respect, gas prices go up, these things out of the president's control that's a problem. if that race turns psychologically and mitt romney gets in the driver's seat it will be hard to get back krrchlt how would you define what the choice the voters want to make. >> i think what voters who are unhappy with things right now are trying to think -- all the
voter interviews we do they're not sure how big of a risk they want to take. they sort of know what president oa bama means for them and has done for them but they're not sure if they want to take a leap over to someone new, starting all over again at this. the obama. >> charlie:bird in hand thing. >> right the obama campaign would say that's risky. the romney would say not risky at all. if taw talk range of motion nim advise rors the convention last week was improving the connection with voters making him look for how many an real. now they have to go the next step and say what he would do. john is right. it's to fire him, hire him. i think everyone got the fire part. the hire part is still in progress. >> charlie:they couldn't do it at their convention because they had to humanize him, they had to introduce him, which is remarkable because you saw that very good biography film of him
which many people said should have been on the air a long time ago. >> right. >> charlie:that whole convention was more about him except for ryan's speech, introducing him -- >> i thought it was surprising omissioning, it's not my job to say whether it's a missed opportunity or not, there was not much policy -- >> charlie:is this election row mind you of any other? is it 2004? >> it's either 1980 or 2004. >> charlie:80 would be reagan. >> in many ways it's different than 2004 because national security is something we have not heard anything about. that's one of the things that's the most strike to go me. we're still not that far after 9-11 and it was absent from the republican convention. you can say if governor romney should have mentioned in his speech. beside that, it's not being discussed. if president obama wins, i think it looks like 2004.
if he loses it locks like 1980. >> charlie:2004 was about towrnout. >> it was bush campaign maximummed their turn outeverywhere. similar strains obama is trying do organizing early states like ohio maximize and find new voters. 204 -- the ways. expand their voting pool over 2000. a lot of their supporters didn't show up. this is exactly about expanding the base. that's why you see so much voter registration going on. they're trying to draw new voters on to the obama side, african americans, latinos. they're trying to make it like 2004. >> charlie:the romney people think they can minimize where the levels of women for obama is today? >> i don't think that they feel they can change that a lot but i
do think -- this election isn't about moving large numbers of voters. >> charlie:is that where they think they have to change it? >> i think it is. they feel and i think the obama people wouldn't argue with this that the critical group of older white men are simply lost to obama. >> to romney. >> older white men. >> lost to the president. >> by the president. >> wives and daughters are willing still to entertain a vote for the president. >> charlie:i would assume the president would talk about foreign policy, wouldn't you. >> i would be stunned if he didn't. >> charlie:me too. not oam because of the contrast but they believe they are run ong a record of success. >> he's the president of the united states. i think it would be irresponsible not to. >> i think it was shocking omission for romney. i thought fred hide's column in washington post was right on.
we have a hot war going on right now in the month of august. i think close to 60 people, 60 americans died in afghanistan. >> charlie:did they have an explanation for that? >> the oam explanation he talked about it the day before in a speech in minneapolis. no one saw t most reporters didn't see. >> charlie:someone said one mention of afghanistan. >> i think that's right. it's not a popular topic even in that room con vengs with these delegates. spending is such a concern. too much money isn't spent on the war. it wouldn't have been a upon lar thing. i still think he could have thanked the troops for their service. that's not controversial. that's a patriotic thing to do. i think it's one of those mysteries of the convention almost as mysterious as clint eastwood he's the only one that
mentioned afghanistan on that final evening. >> charlie:how does that the obama team feel about rekindling of 2008. i heard we don't expect to weunder stand. it's much tougher race than 208 and they had a lot of things going for them in 208 they don't have in 2012 including the tenure in office. do they believe somehow they will be able to come out of this convention with a bit of a remembrance of that? >> i think jeff put it well, or phrase you used remembrance, oh yeah i remember why i like this guy. i don't think they're overly obsessed with rekindling 2008. last couple of years there was internal dea bait and disagreement within the obama camp. how do we preserve obama brand. are we doing things that might risk it by being negative or
super pac money those debates are put to rest. forget about the obama brand. do what'sness necessary to rin. a. >> a point we're make inning political, when you come to permanent attacks both campaigns responsible for negativity of the campaign. both equally to blame. when you talk about personal criticisms, basically trying to tear down the viability of the other candidate in the way that george w. bush inventory down john kerry's credibility, really it's pretty one one sided. the obama campaign does much more than that than the romney campaign. >> charlie:successfully? >> i think fair suck set. >> charlie:primarily bain capital. >> bain capital with romney's. >> charlie:the theme i saw so much coming out of the speeches so far is that he's not like
you. >> well he's not seen dramatically in the polls, 20 percent gap. krrchlt he doesn't care about you. he's not of you have. he doesn't understand you. that's the thing they hammer. >> it's a wide gap. if thre a hammering at it that means it's getting traction. >> try to close in tampa and i think we will see you in the polls next few weeks or so what success they have had. >> i think they're trying niek people por frightened about the prospect of romney presidency. some months ago democrats and he wouldn't do anything dramatic. trying to scare people in the sense he wouldn't have your back, economic interest at heart. i was struck on the first night of the convention of the relentless attacks on his wealth. almost in every speech that was sort of a subtext.
class warfare to a high tee gree. >> charlie:even though welt thy democrats on the stage. >> figment in the sky boxes. >> if you ask what the obama people are afraid of. i've been struck what they're not afraid of. issues that obama and democrats used to treat very defensively like an unexploded bomb. tossing the bomb back and forth. doesn't bother tomorrow talk openly for equal rights. several speeches have mentioned. abortion issues used to be very under the table. they have been very explicit in saying one of the dividing lines is willingness to fight for women's reproductive rights. >> charlie:because they think those issues their time as come? >> i'm not sure it's that or the election is so divided and really the question of this
election is, which side are you on? on the side of people like us or people like them? >> but democrats used to think they succeeded by sort of blurring those lines. that's what bill clinton did effectively. >> even barack obama. >> in 2008. this is not a 2008 style election but 2004, which side are you on. >> charlie:can you make an argument that they have a very different idea of where america is and where it's going, that the president believes and his team when they look at the reality of america today the increasing numbers of hispanics, increasing, the demographic picture of america, it's on their side? >> they think that. >> and a lot republicans. a lot of smartest republicans extra teejist not this one but long term worry about that. >> charlie:republican party
ends up a party of reflection of white america essentially. >> older whiter male america. you cannot put together a long-term winning party on that coalition. >> and mathematically they're right about that. >> charlie:i may have said this to you john, if ronald reagan was running and got the same percentages of hispanics and african americans asians perhaps he would lose because they have grown so significantly. >> we have to be careful saying things like that one reason politics is interesting all of us, nothing stands still. new politicians, come forward. arguments get made issues rise to the surface. i don't think the republicans are in for a long-term too many. i grew up covering virginia. the idea virginia would be a swing state is stunning to me. the idea north carolina is swing state is surprising to even to
you, charlie. there are no permanent line ntion politics. i think it's mistake feem in our business things as they exist now and extrapolate them too far in the future. >> charlie:is your interest and excitement you get from politics every bit as strong as it's always been? >> it is in the big picture. i think the character tion. people who are in politics, people i covered closely like bill clinton, the other characters that's what makings this business fascinating. so i still love that. i do think -- i share the view of a lot of journalist this particular campaign has been a grinding sullen remorseless affair not been a lot of fun. >> i think that's right. i think there's not been a lot of joy in this campaign on either side and the voters seem disgusted by t it is a dynamic story and we don't know the full story and full evolution of
barack obama. who would have thought he would have asked bill clinton to come prop him up. that shows you. >> only point i would make, charlie the purpose of it is not to give joy to reporters. we have a serious business. politics is get rg small and petty we have some power to elevate that and focus on what we think is important. >> charlie:are we doing that? >> we're not doing as well -- you push the rock up the hill. >> charlie:thank you, yon thank you i didn't have. thank you for joining us see you next time captioning sponsored by rose communications
IN COLLECTIONSKQED (PBS) Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News Archive
Uploaded by TV Archive on