Skip to main content

tv   FOX News Sunday With Chris Wallace  FOX  August 29, 2021 10:00am-11:00am PDT

10:00 am
>> chris: i'm chris wallace. a drone strike takes out two high-profile isis-k targets as u.s. troops continue their evacuation mission with just 48 hours to go in afghanistan. ♪ ♪ >> they lost a planner and they lost a facilitator and that got one wounded. >> chris: but warnings the threat is far from over. >> our troops are still in danger, that continues to be the case every day that they are there. >> chris: with the clock ticking down, what does it mean for the security of our troops and civilians looking to get out of harm's way? we will ask white house national security advisor jake sullivan about the situation on the ground and the danger in the final days of the mission.
10:01 am
then... >> the taliban should not be allowed to tell us how long we are there to get our personnel out. >> chris: we will get reaction from senate republican leader mitch mcconnell, who is calling on the president to extend the evacuation beyond tuesday. it's a "fox news sunday" exclusive. plus, the delta variant surges, sending record numbers of children to the icu and spreading turmoil and anxiety among parents and educators over masks in the classroom. we will ask our sunday panel about the latest test the nation's schools. all right now on "fox news sunday." ♪ ♪ >> chris: until again from fox news in washington. we begin with breaking news on two stories. first, hurricane ida, now a dangerous category 4 lashing the louisiana coasm
10:02 am
the mississippi river with wind speeds of 150 miles per hour. the storm, set to make landfall this afternoon, exactly 16 years to the day after hurrica hurricane katrina and described by officials as life altering. more on that later this hour. but first, the next two days could be the most tense and dangerous for u.s. troops in afghanistan since the start of the war some two decades ago. they are trying to evacuate some of the thousands of americans and afghan civilians while at the same time rolling up their own operation. meanwhile, president biden making good on his promise to retaliate for the deadly suicide bombing in kabul, ordering a drone strike that killed two isis-k planners and wounded another. as his advisors more in another attack the airport is likely before the u.s. completes its exit. in a moment, we will discuss all this with the president's national security advisor jake sullivan.
10:03 am
we begin with fox team coverage, david spunt is at the white house, but first, trey yingst in qatar with the latest on the ongoing withdrawal, trey. >> chris, on tuesday, american forces will pack their bags and leave afghanistan after 20 years. today the state department is telling u.s. citizens to stay away from kabul's airport, saving a credible terror threat. days after a suicide bomber killed 13 american service members and an estimated 170 afghans, u.s. troops are on high alert, and while the taliban has expanded their security perimeter along the hamid karzai international airport. the entire city remains on edge. >> what i will say, the last six or seven days have been the toughest days of my life. >> you can hear the exhaustion the voices of civilians, still desperate to flee afghanistan. two weeks ago, the taliban took over the capital of kabul, since then, more than 120,000 people
10:04 am
have been evacuated. american allies like the u.k., spain, and italy, finished flights out of kabul this weekend amid questions about how money people will leave once the august 31st withdraw deadline passes. the taliban told fox news this week that americans will be able to safely exit the country, adding this. >> those who were working with the foreigners and foreign troops, it's a possible they can be acquitted through commercial flights. there is no obstacle on the airway. >> with area evacuations coming to an end, the united nations is warning half a million afghans could flee on foot in the coming weeks. chris. >> chris: trey yingst, reporting from delhi, thank you. now let's bring in david spunt at the white house with the latest on how president biden is handling the final pullout from afghanistan. david. >> chris, the president wimeet s national security team later
10:05 am
today. this, as the pressure on the commander in chief continues to intensify. >> president biden: to those who carried out this attack, we will not forget. >> the president's stern warning to those responsible for the suicide bombing outside the airport in kabul. 24 hours later, a u.s. drone strike killed two members of the islamic state. >> the fact that two of these individuals are no longer walking on the face of the earth, that's a good thing. >> the pentagon is ready for additional strikes if needed. >> we will continue to have the ability to defend ourselves and to leverage over the horizon capability to conduct counterterrorism operations. >> the president hunkered down saturday in the situation room, monitoring threats against u.s. forces and civilians in kabul while mourning the loss of 11 marines, a navy medic, and a soldier. the pentagon released their names and ages. 31 to just 20 saturday before
10:06 am
the president put out a statement which reads in part "the strike was not the last. it will continue to hunt down any person involved in that heinous attack and make them pay." critics are blasting biden's decision to abandon bagram airbase north of kabul nearly two months ago. if the president is rejecting calls to retake bagram, instead putting his energy into the next 48 hours of evacuations. the president traveled to dover air force base in delaware this morning to honor those 13 service members who were killed in that terror attack at the airport last thursday. chris. >> chris: david spunt reporting from the white house. david, thank you. before the president headed to dover, i sat down with his national security advisor, jake sullivan to discuss the final hours of america's engagement on the ground in afghanistan. >> chris: jake, let's start with a drone strike in eastern afghanistan against that isis-k planner and facilitator.
10:07 am
first of all, can you tell us their importance to isis, and secondly, president biden says this will not be the last strike against th for the attack that killed 13 american troops at kabul airport, so how far is he prepared to go to make isis pay? >> jake: the president will stop at nothing to make isis-k pay for the deaths of those american service members at the kabul airport. he will ensure that we get the people responsible for this, that we continue to put pressure on the group responsible for this and that we continue to take targets off the battlefield. with respect to these particular targets, these were facilitators and planners who were involved in the movement and production of explosive devices. our over the horizon counterterrorism capability was proven out. they identified the target, they took the target out and they are now in the process of
10:08 am
identifying further targets to action. >> chris: if we had such good intelligence about isis-k that we were able to strike in a little bit more than 24 hours, why didn't we move against the group before the bombing at kabul airport? >> jake: f targets have been developed, we have action to them. this is the one we had available to us and we took it in a timely basis when we had it. with respect to the attack at kabul airport, we of course have been warning for days that such an attack could take place. we took action to try to prevent and disrupt such attacks, but of course all we can do is mitigate risk, we cannot eliminate risk and this is a fundamentally dangerous and high risk mission. president has said that from the beginning. those of us working on it have reiterated that from the beginning, and it continues, chris, to be very dangerous. if there are more threat streams that we are working actively to try to disrupt and prevent and
10:09 am
as the president has said, another attack could occur at any time. he has directed his commanders on the ground to take every force protection measure possible to ensure the safety of our troops as they complete their mission. >> chris: i want to pick up on exactly what you just said, jake, because we are now in what white house press secretary jen psaki called the most dangerous part of the mission, were on the one hand we are still trying to evacuate americans and afghans from kabul airport, but at the same time, we are trying to roll up, the u.s. military, their operation, their mission there. i want to know with these final hours are going to look like. are americans and afghans were trying to get out, are they going to have to get through checkpoints on their own? are they still going to be able to do that, or at this point in these final hours, are the only people were going to get into the airport people whose travel has been arranged to get there? >> jake: i'm going to be
10:10 am
careful in answering this question, chris, because it is imperative that we protect the operational details of this incredibly sensitive period of the operation, because as you say, our military and the ground, those brave men and women out there, those skilled professionals, are right now both trying to finish the job of getting the remaining american citizens and afghan allies out of afghanistan and complete their retrograde and this is a highly sophisticated, carefully-calibrated exercise, but to directly answer your question, as we speak here today, our forces there and continue to bring in american citizens and other critical people who have helped us and get them on planes and get them home. >> chris: and, jake, what's your expectation? how many americans, how many of our afghan allies will be left behind when we finally pull out at the end of august 31st? >> jake: let me start with
10:11 am
american citizens. we have evacuated, at this point, nearly 5,500 american citizens from kabul. we can never get an absolutely precise count of how many americans were in kabul because americans are required to put themselves in a database as living in afghanistan, but we believe, based on all of the extensive and systematic outreach that we have done, that we are down to a population of 300 or fewer americans who are still on the ground there and we are working actively in these hours and these days to get those folks out. if but i also want to underscore, chris, a very important point. there were some people who have chosen so far not to leave, and that is their right and after august 31st, they are not going to be stuck in afghanistan. we are going to ensure that we have a mechanism to get them out of the country should they choose in the future to come home. the taliban have made commitments to us in that regard, we intend to hold them to those commitments and we have
10:12 am
leveraged to hold them to those commitments. >> chris: well, let me pick up on that. i want to play a clip from something that jen psaki said late this week about our relationship with the taliban, take a look. >> secretary psaki: we have an enormous someone of leverage, this is our view, over time, that include economic leverage, it includes leverage that we will make clear to the taliban as it relates to coordination continue to get american citizens and our partners out. >> chris: do you really believe that we have "in norma's leverage" over the taliban, enough that we are going to be able to get out americans and afghan allies after we pull out? do you really believe that and do you really believe there's a chance we may be able to set up -- re-set up a u.s. embassy in kabul? >> jake: chris, no one here trusts the taliban, no one here is counting on any words the taliban offer. but we are focused on his actions and yes, the answer is emphatically yes.
10:13 am
if we do believe that the united states of america possesses substantial leverage to ensure that american citizens and others get safe passage out of that country and that if they do not, we can bring to bear enormous pressure on the taliban with a swift and forceful response to their blocking any american citizen, whether before august 31st or after august 31st. that's not about trust. that's about the capabilities that we have told the taliban to the commitments that they have voiced directly in the commitments that they have made publicly, and we are working in the united way with dozens of other countries in the international community to ensure that's the case. as far as the u.s. embassy is concerned, right now, s going to come down to the taliban actually pulling through before we can talk of things like embassies and recognition and the like. >> chris: i think some people question whether we have leverage. i understand when you talk about there is pressure we can bring to bear, we have frozen billions
10:14 am
of dollars and afghan assets. there's all kinds of ways we can squeeze them without actually using force, but that may take an example of one member of the taliban, the head of security for the taliban in kabul. this fella, he authorized suicide bombings against u.s. forces in afghanistan over the years. the state department has a $5 billion bounty on this guy's head. do really believe that the kinds of soft power pressure you're talking about is enormous leverage over this zealot? >> jake: first of all, chris, billions of dollars is not soft power. that's real cold hard cash that matters. secondly and probably more importantly, no one is more clear-eyed about who the taliban on and who the network is than the national security professionals that have been working on this issue for the past 20 years. the question is not whether
10:15 am
these are good guys are bad guys. we know the answer to that question. if the question is whether or not they will ultimately see it as being in their interest to let americans through. a lot of people suggested 12 days ago that they wouldn't, that people under the taliban head of security wouldn't let thousands of americans have safe passage to the airport and get out. we have evacuated more than 5,000 americans in that time, and we intend to ensure that any american who wants to leave afghanistan at any time will be able to do so. >> chris: jake, finally, president biden was asked on thursday about his decision to pull out of bagram airbase. here was his answer. >> president biden: they concluded, the military, that bagram was not much value added, that it was much wiser to focus on kabul. and so i followed that recommendation. >> chris: but the generals
10:16 am
gave that recommendation after president biden earlier this spring had overruled their recommendation that he keep at least 2500 troops on the ground. my question is, instead of laying this off on the generals, shouldn't the commander in chief take full responsibility given that they had to make a decision on bagram based on the conditions that he set for them? >> jake: chris, you've heard the president take ultimate responsibility for every decision he's made us commander in chief. he has expressly said the buck stops with him. but let's be real about bagram. there is a difference between tactical advice from the commanders on the ground, what is the right operational method of executing a draw down, and on that he placed great weight on the advice of the people in the field and/or strategic decision to continue a war into its third decade with american troops fighting and dying in a civil war in another country. on the strategic decision,
10:17 am
that's a decision only a president can make. on the tactical decision of which is the right airport to have for an evacuation, of course any response of a president would give significant weight to the advice of the commanders on the ground and their advice was to close bagram and focus on kabul. >> chris: jake, thank you so much for taking time out of this very busy schedule right now to talk with us. thanks again. >> jake: thanks for having me. >> chris: up next, we will have an exclusive interview with senate republican leader mitch mcconnell who says the president has made a grave mistake in afghanistan. where does he think we need to go from here? ♪ ♪
10:18 am
♪ ♪ ♪ (vo) at t-mobile for business, unconventional thinking means we see things differently, so you can focus on what matters most. whether it's ensuring food arrives as fresh as when
10:19 am
it departs. being first on the scene, when every second counts. or teaching biology without a lab. we are the leader in 5g. #1 in customer satisfaction. and a partner who includes 5g in every plan, so you get it all. without trade-offs. unconventional thinking. it's better for business. (vo) while you may not be running an architectural firm, tending hives of honeybees, and mentoring a teenager — your life is just as unique. your raymond james financial advisor gets to know you, your passions, and the way you help others. so you can live your life. that's life well planned.
10:20 am
♪ ♪ >> chris: despite critics' fears thousands of americans and afghan allies will be left behind, creating a possible hostage situation, the white house is holding firm it will pull all u.s. forces out of afghanistan by tuesday. joining us now, senate republican leader mitch mcconnell, who has urged the president to disregard that deadline. senator, you just heard my conversation with national
10:21 am
security advisor jake sullivan. your reaction? >> senator mcconnell: yeah, i think what's been lost in all this, chris, is why we went there in the first place. we went there to prevent the taliban from having a regime that would allow terrorists to reconstitute the b themselves at us here at home. it's been a total success. this term "endless war," let's take a look at it. the last seven months, the afghans have lost more people fighting than we have over 20 years. they've taken 65,000 casualties, we've taken roughly 2,000 in 20 years. the last year and a half we lost no one. with the continued deployment of 2500 people, we were in effect keeping a lid on, keeping terrorists from reconstituting,
10:22 am
and having a light footprint in the country. the policy was working. therefore, i think calling it an endless war or claiming that we are somehow trying to get involved in a civil war is domestic civil war is simply not accurate. we went over there to protect us here at home. we have not had a mass casualty attack from over there in these 20 years. i'd call that a successful policy. now we are looking at the exit and over the next two days, our heroic military is doing the best they can with a horrible policy decision. this is one of the worst foreign policy decisions in american history. much worse than saigon because after we left saigon there were there weren't vietnamese terrorists who were planning on attacking us here at home. that we leave behind exactly what we went in to solve 20
10:23 am
years ago and i fear for the future and continue the war on terror. just because we decided to quit fighting doesn't mean the terrorists go away, so they are still out there, they are invigorated, they are emboldened and excited about the success they say in bringing america to its knees in afghanistan. >> chris: i want to get into th find ourselves right now, because we are where we are today and it's clear the president is going to pull up all u.s. forces by tuesday, he's made it clear he's going to do that, which raises the question, given that reality, how do we get the rest of the americans and afghans out of the country? how do we protect ourselves going forward from a terror attack that emanates from afghanistan, and how do we deal with the taliban?
10:24 am
>> senator mcconnell: very poorly, frankly. we will not have sources on the ground. the over the horizon attacks such as was carried out is, you know, quite limited in the effectiveness and every either american or afghan ally left behind is either a potential victim or a hostage. remember the taliban love taking hostages. they've done this before. it puts us in an extraordinarily difficult position and also remember, afghanistan is landlocked. there's only one way in by air and one way out by air. we don't have sort of friends in the neighborhood that would provide us the kind of intelligence that we would normally get, for example, in syria or in africa or in yemen, so it's going to be extremely difficult. we have very, very little leverage to extract additional
10:25 am
americans or afghan allies from this landlocked country. >> chris: i want to pick up on that, because you say we have very little leverage. you know, you've just heard jake sullivan say we have a lot of leverage and he talked about international pressure, diplomatic pressure, and especially financial pressure, because we had some of our western allies have frozen billions of dollars in assets that the taliban is very much going to need to continue to do business. do you not see that as enormous leverage? >> senator mcconnell: well, they have other sources of revenue, the network and groups, organized crime, basically. they have other sources of revenue and of course they are not particularly concerned about international pressure. these are barbarians who certainly are not motivated by
10:26 am
what others may think of them, and they've got the neighboring countries that have actually been sympathetic to them. the pakistan government has always been somewhat sympathetic to them so they've got kind of a friendly neighbor as well. so we have little or no leverage to get our people out or our allies. what's been really encouraging his to see the american veterans will come back from their working with their former interpreters, communicating with them, trying to get them back to the airport to get out of there. the american veterans, we've heard from many of them in my state, i know other members of congress have, have been working overnight trying to get their friends and allies out of that country. it's been quite inspiring to see all of these veterans pitching and then trying to help their former colleagues. >> chris: let's turn to the big policy question that you
10:27 am
started with, and that is the decision to pull out of afghanistan and the first place. you've been very consistent. you opposed at one donald trump started the process, you opposed it when joe biden continue the process and back when he announced that, yes, in april, he said, i'm going to get everybody out by the end of august, you noted the fact, as you did today, that for more than a year, not a single american had been killed in combat in afghanistan. president biden was asked about that this week and he pointed out the fact that they didn't attack us after donald trump had made the deal that all of americans were going to get out. take a look at what the president had to say. resnick have only one alternative. for thousands of more troops back into afghanistan to fight a war that we had already won -- that was the reason we went to the first place.
10:28 am
>> chris: senator, does president biden have a point there? if in april he had said hey, the trump deal is off, we are staying in and in fact we are going to beef up the number of e back in -- we would have been a full-scale war with the taliban and taking a lot of casualties. >> senator mcconnell: totally not accurate. once again the president is off the mark. we hadn't lost as many as 13 people, which we lost thursday, in any of the last four years. in fact, our casualties since 2014 have been quite modest, quite modest. we lost more -- i repeat -- more of our military personnel last thursday then we lost in any one of the last four years, so the balance has been dramatically reduced for american personnel. remember, in the whole war, chris, we have regretfully lost a couple of thousand of our people.
10:29 am
that's very regretful, but the afghans have lost 65,000. they have been fighting and we've been in the background helping them with counterterrorism and the ongoing training of the military. the policy was working if you remember why we went there, it was to keep the taliban out in the terrorists from being able to operate with impunity so they can attack us again here at ho home. >> chris: senator, i've got about a minute left, i want to ask you one question on another subject. you've been very active on the issue of covid, pushing vaccines, you've even taken some of your campaign funds to do publish a service announcement the highest number of new covid cases right now are in florida and texas, where two republican governors have banned mask mandates in schools and other places. do you think that governor desantis and governor abbott are making a
10:30 am
mistake banning individual institutions, school districts, from imposing mask mandates? >> senator mcconnell: you know, i'm kind of reluctant to give governors advice about how they ought to carry out their responsibilities during the pandemic, but i do think it's important to remember that 90% of the people in the hospitals are unvaccinated, so the answer to this is get vaccinated. if we could keep saying that over and over and over again, i think that's the key to this. this is a crisis among unvaccinated americans who seem to be reluctant to believe that vaccination works. it does. >> chris: senator mcconnell, thank you. thanks for your time this sunday, it's always good to talk with you, sir. >> senator mcconnell: thanks, chris. >> chris: up next we will bring in our sunday group to discuss the high-stakes exit from afghanistan. will it now become the center of
10:31 am
radical islamic terrorism? ♪ ♪ we want to be known as america's mortgage company for veterans and active-duty service people. some of them are giving their lives right now, today, for the freedoms that we have here in this country. so for us, at newday, to help those people at this point in time. it's a labor of love, it's a noble service, and that's what we're all about.
10:32 am
>> chris: coming up, evacuations and airlift continue in afghanistan as the military monitors terror threats in real time. >> our troops are still in danger, that continues to be the case every day that they are there. >> chris: we will ask our sunday panel about the final hour
10:33 am
i'm morgan, and there's more to me than hiv. more love, more adventure, more community. but with my hiv treatment, there's not more medicines in my pill. i talked to my doctor and switched to fewer medicines with dovato. dovato is for some adults who are starting hiv-1 treatment or replacing their current hiv-1 regimen. with just 2 medicines in 1 pill, dovato is as effective as a 3-drug regimen... to help you reach and stay undetectable. research shows people who take hiv treatment as prescribed and get to and stay undetectable can no longer transmit hiv through sex. don't take dovato if you're allergic to its ingredients or if you take dofetilide. taking dovato with dofetilide can cause serious or life-threatening side effects. hepatitis b can become harder to treat while on dovato. don't stop dovato without talking to your doctor, as your hepatitis b may worsen or become life-threatening. serious or life-threatening side effects can occur, including allergic reactions, lactic acid buildup, and liver problems. if you have a rash and other symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop dovato and get medical help right away.
10:34 am
tell your doctor if you have kidney or liver problems, or if you are, may be, or plan to be pregnant. dovato may harm your unborn baby. use effective birth control while on dovato. do not breastfeed while taking dovato. most common side effects are headache, nausea, diarrhea, trouble sleeping, tiredness, and anxiety. so much goes into who i am. hiv medicine is one part of it. ask your doctor about dovato-i did. ♪ >> president biden: we will not forgive. we will not forget. we will hunt you down and make you pay. >> chris: president biden vowing to avenge thursday's suicide bombing at kabul airport that killed 13 u.s. troops and
10:35 am
more than 150 afghans. and with friday's drone strike that took out to members of isis-k, he began to make good on that pledge. it's time now for our sunday group. g.o.p.e linskey, who covers the white house fo washington post." in fox news political analysjua. annie, i think it's fair to say, i don't think anybody would disagree, this has been the toughest week or two weeks of the biden presidency. first of all, that stumbling start after the taliban took kabul. then they seemed to get a handle on the evacuation and then of course thursday, the tragic bombing at the airport that killed, as we say, 13 u.s. service members and 150 afghans. where is the biden white house at this point, and with all of the ups and downs, are there new splits inside the it administration? >> yeah, thank you, chris. as we are speaking, you know,
10:36 am
right now, the president of course on his way to dover to do what has got to be the most difficult task of his presidency so far, which is to try to provide some amount of comfort, if they are willing to see him, to the family members whose remains are being transferred right now. you know, texting with some of my white house sources this morning, they recognize that this moment for biden is particularly charged. of course he's going to dover in the past, but never in this type of circumstance when it was his call. to your other point, you know, have there been factions within not only the white house, but the administration about whether this was the best course forward, of course there have been and we've been reporting on this, fox has been reporting on this since july when there were many, many people who were pointing out to the president
10:37 am
that kabul could fall by quickly and for some reason, this administration did not see that as the consensus view or a credible view, and they have, you know, lived to regret that choice, and what we have seen in the last few weeks has been truly awful. >> chris: karl, i'm curious, and we heard two different versions of this from jake sullivan and senator mcco senator mcconnell, this talk about all the leverage we have over the taliban. obviously whatever leverage we have is the only way, after tuesday, but we are going to be able to get americans and afghans realistically out of the country, but is this realistic, this idea that we have "an enormous leverage" over the taliban? >> i think it's ludicrous and we got a taste of it when mr. sullivan talked about the financial advantage we have, the
10:38 am
economic advantage. in other words, we are going to bribe these people, the taliban, to do the right thing. i noticed the president was very emphatic about taking action against isis-k to kill 13 americans on thursday, but remember, if the taliban who is largely responsible for the vast bulk of american deaths of the last 20 years yet his administration seems to have the energy that we are going to send a drone strike at isis-k but we are going to bribe the taliban to do the right thing. even though we know for fact certain that the department of defense ig has said -- three times the ig has said they continue to work hand in glove with al qaeda and we also know that they have violated what is apparently a secret part of the trumpet ministrations agreement not to attack 34 provincial capitals. they have all those capitals in their hands right now so they are unreliable in the idea of we are going to be able to bribe them to be friends of ours is ridiculous. >> chris: juan, the president
10:39 am
is at pains to stay that look, the terror threat has metastasized, it has spread across asia and africa and it's in a lot of places and a lot of places he thinks, or he contends, in a much greater and more threatening way than it is in afghanistan but over the last few weeks, the taliban, as we give up these prisons, was able to release thousands. according to the pentagon, thousands of al qaeda and isis-k prisoners. i mean is it just realistic that afghanistan is now going to become central headquarters for the islamic jihadist movement? >> well, i think that, you know, biden's critics, and i think there is certainly a realistic look at it, just like you described it, chris. there's the potential for a terror threat now not only across the globe, but specific to us here in the united states coming from terrorists who are based in afghanistan once again.
10:40 am
but i think it's important to put this in some context. this is not the terror threat we faced on 9/11. this is very different. i mean, you stop and think about it, the differences include one, the element of surprise is gone. two, we have a department of homeland security and intelligence networks with our allies that are aimed at terrorists and specifically now afghanistan and also you have to keep in mind, the terror threat is smaller because the world, it seems to me, is vastly different. you can't get on a plane, our buildings are now all supported, intentionally designed to withstand that kind of thing, and we also have the whole notion that if we leave troops there -- and i think this is so critical -- there is a looming civil war between the taliban, isis, and warlords, that would put our troops in great danger and pull us back into that war. right now isis and the taliban are at each other's throats emma
10:41 am
and then you have china and russia, which arnt to afghanistan. t is the one we faced on 9/11. >> chris: karl, i've got about 30 seconds left in the segment. are you reassured by juan and all the ways in which he says things are different and better than around 11? >> no. now the taliban has an enormous stash of weapons, which they are now going to become the world's largest arms dealer. they had an enormous stash of cash. as you pointed out earlier, they engaged in organized crime, mainly the just regional drugs. and i hope juan is right, they haven't been spending the last when you're speaking out to hit us. the amount of actionable intelligence we have and people inside of afghanistan is going to dwindle over time because we are no longer on the ground and our allies are not on the ground and the allies have remained on the ground are going to be trying to hide rather than being
10:42 am
killed. i have a friend who's been in touch with his interpreter who was killed by the taliban because he was with america and he wasn't in kabul and he was therefore out of the limelight. >> chris: all right, panel, we have to take a break here. we are going to hear more stories like that i suspect. we will see later in the hour. up next, mandatory evacuations across the louisiana coast as hurricane ida strengthens and nears landfall. live reports from the fox weather center and new orleans when we come back. ♪ ♪
10:43 am
do you have a life insurance policy you no longer need? now you can sell your policy, even a term policy, for an immediate cash payment. we thought we had planned carefully for our retirement. but we quickly realized that we needed a way to supplement our income. if you have one hundred thousand dollars or more of life insurance you may qualify to sell your policy. don't cancel or let your policy lapse without finding out what it's worth. visit to find out if you policy
10:44 am
qualifies. or call the number on your screen. coventry direct, redefining insurance.
10:45 am
>> chris: now, fox news weather alert. we are tracking hurricane ida is the category four storm
10:46 am
approaches the louisiana coast on a track very similar to hurricane katrina 16 years ago today. jeff paul is live in new orleans with the latest, but first to rick reichmuth in the fox weather pen. >> yeah, this storm incredibly dangerous. we've seen a massive strengthening from this storm during the overnight hours and then this morning. pressure has dropped considerably and continues to do so. so we're talking about a storm that is strengthening. you don't like to see that making landfall. there is the center of it, getting very close to the coastline. where it comes on shore, that's going to be where worst of the searches. some cases, 12 to 16 bit of search and then you will notice we are talking about hurricane warnings that go well in lands making landfall as a hurricane. it's going to take a long time for that to wind down, so we're going to be seen hurricane conditions in places like baton rouge, certainly in new orleans and when you look at the radar here, it's going to be getting very close, probably about two to three hours before we have landfall. so hurricane conditions in new orleans, we are going to be talking about storm surge. we will see if those levees can
10:47 am
hold in the new orleans area. that's going to be the first big test of hurricane anywhere in new orleans since katrina hit 16 years ago today. chris. >> chris: rick, thanks. now it's bringing jeff paul in new orleans where residents are either heading out of town or bracing to write out the storm. jeff. >> yeah, chris, the winds are really starting to intensify as hurricane ida gets closer and closer to making landfall. still a few stragglers out here in the french quarter of new orleans, but you go to some of those low-lying areas and people are really starting to make the decision to get out and clear out as fast as they can, and that's part of the reason why we saw so much traffic yesterday and into today along the highways. people going west to houston, going east to just get out, maybe get to georgia or florida, or just heading straight north, but because this storm got so strong so fast, it did not give the city time to order a mandatory evacuation, so people
10:48 am
who are staying are either writing it out with stocked up groceries, sandbags and fuel for their cars or generators, and many businesses are boarding up, but some others, some restaurants in particular are staying open to keep it as a spot for folks are either good food or just to seek refuge. some restaurant owners say this storm reminds them of previous devastating storms and they're going to be watching a very close. >> nobody was paying attention to this until it was could be a 4, could be a 5. and then every buddy kind of woke up and realized while matt, we do not want the storm. i mean, because it did -- it wiped this whole coast out. my businesses included at the time. >> it's pretty low-lying, you've got marsh on either side, the beach on that side, so there's really nowhere for the water to go but to come in land. >> as the storm gets closer, emergency management officials warn people that if you are staying, be prepared to go days without power because many of
10:49 am
those roads to get cruise into make those repairs will either be blocked or damaged by debris. chris. >> chris: jeff paul reporting from new orleans. jeff, thank you, and please stay safe. when we come back, a federal judge tosses out the band by governor desantis are mask mandates and schools. we will discuss the fight over who gets to decide what's best for the nation's students. ♪ ♪ (vo) while you may not be closing on a business deal while taking your mother and daughter on a once-in-a-lifetime adventure — your life is just as unique. your raymond james financial advisor gets to know you, your dreams, and the way you care for those you love. so you can live your life. that's life well planned. (vo) at t-mobile for business, unconventional thinking means we see things differently, so you can focus on what matters most.
10:50 am
whether it's ensuring food arrives as fresh as when it departs. being first on the scene, when every second counts. or teaching biology without a lab. we are the leader in 5g. #1 in customer satisfaction. and a partner who includes 5g in every plan, so you get it all. without trade-offs. unconventional thinking. it's better for business. ♪ ♪ ♪
10:51 am
>> the u.s. is the only major country saying this has to be forced on people by the government. i think it is something the parents should be deciding. i know it is not something the government should be deciding buried >> chris: four to governor ron desantis defending his order banning mandates and schools which was just blocked by a state judge on friday and we are back now with the panel. karl, florida is averaging over 20,000 new covid cases a day and as we said, the florida judge just rejected, just overruled his ban on school districts imposing mask mandates with covid cases spiking in pediatric cases included in that and his polls slipping, can desantis
10:52 am
keep to this hard-line? >> well, it's going to be a big test for him obviously and only time will tell. i want to repeat what mitch mcconnell said earlier, senator mcconnell was absolutely right. the only way for us to grapple with this is to have ever-increasing levels of vaccination and to the degree that we are talking about these side issues of whether or not first graders ought be wearing masks or not, the time devoted to that is time that we can't spend and don't spend on encouraging more people to get vaccinated. >> chris: meanwhile, there were several new developments on covid this week at a want to put them up on the screen. more than 100,000 covid hospitalizations across the country on thursday and more than 2,000 deaths across the country that same day, first time we crossed the 2,000 mark since march. the fda gave full approval to the pfizer vaccine and after the president talked about a third booster shot eight months after
10:53 am
the second shot from the vaccine, we got this. >> president biden: the question raised should be shorter than eight months, should it just be five months and that's being discussed. >> chris: juan, where are we now in the fight against covid? >> well, chris, i think let's start with the numbers that you put up on the screen, but also the good news. the good news really boils down to more people are getting vaccinated. one day this past week we saw more than a million people get the vaccination, so there's been a surge in people changing their minds and going to get vaccinated. now, having said that, i think it's 52% of americans now have had a full shot, both doses or 70 plus percent at least one shot, but the excuses for not getting vaccinated are also illustrated by the numbers you put up on the screen. you've had fda approval now of the pfizer vaccine, so clear the
10:54 am
government stands behind the vaccines. two, employers are saying that either you get vaccinated or you are willing to be regularly tested and pay a higher fee or insurance or get another job. you can't work here. that also, the employers, the business community now standing strong and then finally i think the courts side and with the schools and saying that mask mandates are realistic and good health policy, again, i think this is all very good, so the anti-vax crowd and the politicians who kowtow to them, i see them as having allowed this virus to spread and now that suicidal mind-set is in retreat. >> chris: annie, there was another development in all of this this week, and that is that we got a summary, i nonclassified summary, of the intelligence assessment of the origins of the covid virus and as i understand it, four agencies with low confidence
10:55 am
said they still believe that the covid came from the wet markets, from a bat or some other animal spreading to a human in wuhan, china, and one agency with moderate confidence said they think it came out of the wuhan virology lab. so where does that leave this debate? >> chris, when president biden announced that he was going to do this review earlier this year, 90 days ago, i think, you know, at that time a lot of people were very hopeful that scrubbing through the intelligence again would bring us to some kind of conclusive answer. i mean, i have to say, my reporting at the time, most of the experts we talked to said it was unlikely that would happen and you know, we all are so curious and so desperately need to get to the answer on this question. so this report didn't move us too much further in that direction other than to say
10:56 am
conclusively it was not a biological weapon, and so i think that does provide perhaps a little bit of comfort, but you know, we still very much need to put pressure on china and i believe that is what the bike the administration is talking about to try to get some additional answers, which i think we all will he desperately would like to see. >> chris: karl, let me pick up on that, because, you know, everyone wants to see an answer here. is there anything we can do to get the chinese to be more transparent? because i think the general assessment is unless they provide more answers than they have so far, this is going to remain a puzzle. >> yeah, good luck with that, they are not going to be more forthcoming. when you have a government, as we have in the form of the chinese government, alleging that this really came from fort dietrich maryland and was part of a military plot by the united states, you clearly do not have a government, the communist party of china, interested at all in being transparent or forthcoming so we are stuck where we are, they are
10:57 am
not going to be more forthcoming with any information and allow us to resolve this. >> chris: juan, your thoughts? is there anything we can do? you know, obviously we are not going to go to war, but short of that, is there anything that joe biden can do with the man he said he spent so much time with, president xi, to try to get the chinese to be more transparent about the origins of this virus? >> sorry to tell you, chris, but i think we are headed in the other direction. these people have refused to be helpful, transparent. i think they have used the world health organization as blockers to prevent us from getting the facts. that's why the report from this intelligence agency said they couldn't come to a conclusion. although just to underscore annie's point, it's not the case that it was intentionally used as a military or bio weapon. i think they clearly stated that. but i just don't see how the chinese are going to change or we can count on the chinese reversing course at this
10:58 am
juncture. >> chris: well, thank you all for participating in a jam-packed show. we will see you all next sunday. and one final note. as we end our 20 year war in afghanistan, it's worth remembering we did accomplish our prime objective there. i've written a new book called "countdown bin laden: the untold story of the 247 day hunt to bring the mastermind of 9/11 to justice." it's intelligence, political, and military branches came together to pull it off. you can preorder "countdown" now, it comes out september 7th, in time for the 20th anniversary of 9/11. and that's it for today, have a great week and we will see you next "fox news sunday." ♪ ♪
10:59 am
11:00 am
(announcer) the following program is a paid advertisement for aaa smart home, brought to you by a3 smart home lp. (soft music) (iris) there's no place like home. it's where memories are made and where you feel the most safe and secure. today, more than ever, you wanna keep it that way. hi, i'm iris almario. today we're going to introduce you to aaa smart home. it's home security, the aaa way. and i'm brian mcardle. you already know aaa, the legendary emergency response company that's been helping to keep families safe on the road for over 100 years. now that same aaa assurance is available for your home with aaa smart home, a fully integrated security, safety,


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on