tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC August 29, 2013 6:00pm-7:01pm PDT
to give you congratulations for beating me in the ratings and a warning you should never do it again and did it a second night in a row. >> i feel like this is a taboo breaking fourth wall exploding conversation. we do this, i'm ashamed we're talking about this in front of the viewers. >> you know what, actually we shouldn't talk about this in front of everybody. let's cut this before we go live. >> all right. >> thanks, chris. oh, hello, there. thanks to you at home for staying with us this hour. happy thursday. there's a ton going on in the news right now. obviously syria and the possibility of the u.s. or the west, more broadly, taking military action against syria to punish them for allegedly using chemical weapons. that story is at the forefront of the news internationally, and it has been breaking quickly. new news about that has been breaking quickly over the course of the late afternoon and early evening tonight. so we're going to have more on that this hour with andrea mitchell. including the really quite brilliant debate some of our allies have been having about syria even if we, in this country, are not having an
official brilliant debate of our own. continuing reverberations from the 50th anniversary of the march on washington from august 1963. martin luther king's "i have a dream" speech. the conservative media in our country, mostly yesterday, tried to pretend that anniversary was not happening. they spent last night complaining bitterly there were no republicans on stage a the 50th anniversary event. republicans weren't invited. today was the day when the conservative media finally bothered to fwogoogle the thing they were complaining about after the fact to realize tons of republicans were invited to be on the stage at the march on washington, it's just that every single one of them said no. the first president bush said no for health reasons. the second president bush said no also presumably for health reasons. jeb bush said no as well, because i don't know. as did john boehner. as did republican house majority leader eric cantor who has been trying to reinvent himself as the republican vaguely friendly
toward sieve rights. eric cantor this year marched with john lewis at the re-enactment of the selma march at the edmund pettus bridge. he's been trying to improve his image on civil rights. when they asked him to attend the 50th anniversary of the march on washington, eric cantor said no because apparently he had oil companies to talk to. still, though, the right was outraged all day yesterday there were no republicans at the march. they were not outraged at the republicans who were invited and didn't show up. they were outraged at the march, itself. and thus proceeds the conservative effort to re-brand themselves and the republican party as friendly to minorities. obviously that is a tadaily struggle. lots of news today. exciting news ahead this hour about north carolina and voting rights. an exon story that will blow your mind tonight and a republican state attorney general to talk about to that hour. that's all ahead. we begin tonight with a
change on paradigm, a sea change. today the justice department announced a change in american policy, a u-turn on something that had been going the other direction full speed ahead for decades for as long as i have been alive. today it has turned. and this kind of thing has been happening a lot recently. a lot, at least, during this presiden presidency. during the last presidency in 2004, when george w. bush was running for re-election, you might remember that one of the ways the republicans tried to kind of game the system for that election, particularly in states where they thought things were going to be close, was they made sure in those states republicans pushed ballot measures for that fall's election that were anti-gay rights. they calculated that anti-gay marriage sentiment was so strong that it would drive conservative voters to the polls in really high numbers and while those conservative voters were there at the polls to vote against the gay, those voters, of course, could also be reliably counted on to vote for george w. bush as well. there were 11 anti-gay ballot
measures sharing the ballot with george w. bush that year in 1 1 states and the anti-gay side won in every single one of those states. george w. bush won as well in 9 of those 11 states and, of course, he won the presidency. in that election and for years before and after, every single time that marriage rights for same-sex couples got a statewide vote in this country, it lost. more than 30 times all across the country. every single time there was a statewide vote, it was a loss. it felt like that was forever, an intractable, permanent, count on it reliable american prej th dis. you could plan other elections on how reliable bli you could count on gay people being denied equal rights at the polls. it wasn't just republicans. democrats were terrible on issue as well. the two great legislative legacies of the democratic president before george w. bush were don't ask, don't tell, and the defense of marriage act.
yeah, thanks for nothing, bill clinton. at the highest levels of american politics, gay rights were toxic and basically everybody was terrible on the issue. it just seemed like it was never going to change. that was not that long ago. but now that has very much changed. not only do equal rights now win when they get statewide votes, but the campaign manager for that bush re-election effort in 2004, the re-election effort which used that national anti-gay ballot measure strategy, that campaign manager has, himself, now come out as gay and apologized and is spending his time now working to flip more states into supporting equal rights. steve schmidt, a strategist for that exploitively anti-gay george w. bush re-election effort in 2004 now works for aclu nationally as a pro-gay marriage republican organizer. now in 2013, bill clinton's defense of marriage act is gone. you have to check your watch to see how many states are recognizing equal marriage because the number is increasing
seemingly every day. and then today, this afternoon, the internal revenue service just made this announcement which not long ago would have been absolutely unimaginable. look what they put out today. look at this. irs announces that all legal same-sex marriages will be recognized for federal tax purposes. ruling provides certainty, benefits and protections under federal tax law for same-sex couples. married gay couples and file joint tax returns, so says the irs officially. who ever though this day would come? i mean, i guess if you're 10 years old and don't remember what it was like to see the president of the united states crowing about how he would make sure gay people are always discriminated against and maybe you should vote for him. maybe if you're 10 years old or younger and never saw that as a se sentient being, you knew this day was coming. otherwise it's hard to look at this today and believe that is true.
that's true as of today. you know, it is also true that it felt forever like the prison population in this country was going to go up and up forever until all of a sudden it started to drop. three years in a row it has dropped after something like 30 years of it rising inexorably before that. the same goes for the number of americans who are uninsured who don't have health insurance. that number rose intractably year after year, always getting worse and worse and even worse still until all of a sudden it started to get better. it turned around once health reform passed and the number of uninsured people in this country is expected to make its largest drop ever next year once the health exchanges are up and running. "talking points memo" posted new ads from a bunch of states showing how people in various states are about to start learning about the health exchange where they live where you can go online and choose better cheaper health insurance than you might have been able to get. that hasn't even rolled out yet but we've already turned the corner on something that seemed like it was on a track without
corners. in politics, just in our citizenship, there are a handful of what seemed like forever problems. things that were always getting worse. downward trends that we lived with for 20 years, 30 years, 40 years. things that only ever seemed to get worse that have now stopped getting worse and are getting better. i'm not talking about things that fluctuate up and down all the time but things that were like this forever and now all of a sudden they've turned. of course, it's not true of everything. it's not true of a lot of very big things, but it is true of some things, and today we got another one. we got a big one. when richard nixon declared the start of the drug war in 1971, it is clear from contemporaneous reporting he thought he was tee clairing a war that he could win. he thought that with a sufficient show of federal force and presidential leadership, this whole drugs thing could be kicked. he could win a war on drugs and everybody would love him for it and nobody would use drugs anymore. what he was actually doing, though, is signing up not only
what was left of his own administration but every american president to come after him for a constant sisfissian struggle against something that never got better, something that was made worse by them fighting it. jimmy carter tried to undo some of it in the 1970s but reagan ramped it up to a higher pitch than ever when he took over. the 1980s saw mandatory minimum sentencing laws passed and three-strike laws. poppy bush, george h.w. bush redeclared the war on drugs and arrest numbers related to pot shot through the roof. all the policy changes went in the same direction. more draconian laws. more enforcement. more people arrested. more people in jail. longer sentences. democrats were not much help. president bill clinton advised by the u.s. sentencing commission there was no reason for these to be these hugely increased penalties for the crack kind of cocaine as compared to the powdered kind of cocaine. but he rejected that recommendation and decided to keep the draconian sentencing in
place for crack. now, of course, over all these years and all of these presidents and redeclarations of war, there's been no real effect on american drug use. there has just been a vast expansion of the criminal justice system. criminal justice system at its least effective and most intrusive. and it has never seemed like it would ever get any better. if you are 40 years old, say, then your life has spanned the drug war. all of your teenage years, your 20s, 30s, have been about the drug war not only existing but ramping up and up and up with no end in sight no matter what was in charge. except now it finally changing. at least some of it is changing. that sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powdered cocaine that president clinton did not seem fit to act on despite the o ppinion commission, president clinton didn't seem fit to act on that. under president obama, that was
passed through congress and signed into law. president obama signed the bill to fix that disparity with his attorney general eric holder looking on as he signed it. just two weeks ago attorney general eric holder issued dramatically new directions for federal prosecutors telling them essentially to stop charging people for most drug offenses in a way that would trigger those mandatory minimum sentences. a huge reversal. that's a huge reversal after 30 years of the laws and the guidelines always clamping down in the opposite direction. and then today biggest change yet. in november, colorado and washington state both passed ballot measures legalizing pot in small quantities for recreational use. lots of states have legalized the use of marijuana for medical purposes but in the last few years, more than a dozen states have done that. but in colorado and washington, voters said the police should not care why you are using pot. if you are wrusing pot to get intoxicated, to get high, that should not be illegal in small amounts for personal use. pot should instead just be regulated in much the same way
that alcohol is. and that is fine as far as state law goes. it was pretty definitive both in both colorado and washington state. what was awkward, though, and legally confrontational an those changes in those two states is even if colorado and washington wanted pot to be legal under state law, marijuana is still a controlled substance, illegal under the federal controlled substance s act. see. it's right there. number 10. spelled with an "h." marihuana, before mescaline and lsd. how can something be legal in two american states but illegal in america? legal in two states but illegal in the whole country. is the federal government going to let colorado and washington do this? the attorney general for the state of washington had said recently that he was girding for the federal government to sue him, to sue the state of washington and state of colorado, presumably, to
overturn those state laws legalizing pot, thus rendering pot illegal nationwide, full stop. that is pretty much what everybody was expecting. today the justice department said they are not going to do that. in a letter to all federal prosecu prosecutors, the attorney general's office says colorado and washington effectively can move ahead with decriminalizing pot for personal use in those states. the justice department says that states need to abide by some law enforcement priorities in terms of the way they regulate pot. things like keeping it away from kids and preventing interstate traffic and preventing drugged driving and some other stuff, but the headline here is that colorado and washington can go ahead and legalize pot for personal recreational use. with the federal government's blessing. there will be no federal challenge to pot legalization in two states. this is a big deal in one day's news. but in the context of a lifetime's worth of the futile ever more aggressive war on drugs, what the administration just did today feels unimaginable. it feels like cats chasing dogs.
it feels like pigs flying. it feels like the harlem globe trotters losing. it happened. it's done. adjust your expectations for what is within the realm of the possible in our country. rings ]ol [ male announcer ] from the last day of school, back to the first. they're gonna make everything from posters to do it yourself tattoos. so make sure they've got the sharpies to make their mark. this week only get sharpie five packs for a dollar. staples has it. staples. that was easy.
i had my reality check when i'd be sitting there with my friends who had their verizon phones and i'd be sitting there like "mine's still loading!" i couldn't get email. i couldn't stream movies. i couldn't upload any of our music. that's when i decided to switch. now that i'm on verizon, everything moves fast. with verizon, i have that reliability. i'm completely happy with verizon. verizon's 4g lte is the most reliable and in more places than any other 4g network. period. that's powerful. verizon. get the nokia lumia 928 for free. when the country decides to intervene militarily somewhere else in the world, particularly in another country where a bloody civil war is raging, there should be a robust political debate about the wisdom of that military
intervention. today that debate happened on the floor of the house and it was a robust and at times just an excellent debate. wasn't here, of course. here in our country all that happened was a phone call between members of the administration and some members of congress who are basically still enjoying their vacation. we didn't have any debate here. no official debate. not even any official discussion. where they actually had the debate, the excellent debate was across the pond. >> why is it that our allies in the middle east like saudi, emirates, qatar, kuwait and others, cannot take military action in why does it fall on us yet again? >> put simply, is it in britain's national interest to maintain an international taboo about the use of chemical weapons on the battlefield? my argument is yes, it is. i take a question from the scottish national party. >> does he know if there are any plans over the last few days for any military action before next week planned at all against
syr syria i obviously can't discuss the details of potential action in detail in front of this house, but i can tell the house the american president and i have had discussions, been reported in the newspaper, about potential military action. we have had those discussions and the american president would like to have allies alongside the united states. our actions will not be determined by my good friend and ally, the united states president, but decided in this house of commons. yes, of course, intelligence is part of this picture, but let's not pretend there is one smoking piece of intelligence that can solve the whole problem. this is a judgment issue and one which honorable members will have to make a judgment. let me repeat, again, there will be no action without a further vote in this house of commons. on this issue, britain should not stand aside. we must play our part in a strong international response. we must be prepared to take decisive action in order to do
so. for this house, it's surely a basic point. evidence should proceed decision. not decision proceed evidence. and i'm glad that on reflection, the prime minister accepted this yesterday. >> i give way to the honorable gentleman. >> very much welcome his doctrine that evidence should proceed decision. that's a stark change from at least one of his predecessors. >> i'm clear of the fact we have to learn the lessons of iraq, of course we have to learn those lessons. one of the most important lessons was, indeed, about respect for the united nations. i do not rule out supporting the pr prime minister but he has to make a better case than he did today on this question. he can't say this does not change our house on syria, does not change our involvement in the syrian con fliflict because frankly, it would, mr. speaker. this is is a grave decision and should be treated as such by this house and will be treated as such by this country. >> after eight hours of riveting debate today, the british
parliament decided to reject their prime minister's call for a british response to the alleged use of chemical weapons by the syrian government. this was not even a call specifically for british military action against ssyria, just a condemnation. but the parliament said no. they said specifically that they want to wait until the u.n. weapons inspectors have completed their investigation into what actually happened before britain mounts or even participates in any action in response. the weapons inspectors had been expected to finish their work in syria by sunday. now the u.n. says they will actually finish by tomorrow. here in the u.s., lots of members of congress here have been calling for there to be a congressional debate on how the u.s. should respond in syria. but as fired up as all these members of congress sound in all their letters, it's not like they're rushing back to washington to get to work. they're all still on break and it looks like they're going to stay that way. for his part, president obama today started giving indications that he feels justified in acting alone. the white house leaking to "the
new york times" that the president is prepared to move ahead with a limited military strike on syria even with the rejection of such action by britain's parliament and an increasingly rest of congress here. "mr. obama has made clear the initiative here would come from the u.s. and while he welcomes international participation, he is not depending on the involvement of foreign forces for what will essentially be an operation conducted entirely by the united states military from naval vessels off the syrian coast." "the new york times" sources tonight pegging the timing of a unilateral american military strike on syria to as soon as when those u.n. inspectors leave. which could be as soon as tomorrow. joining us now is is andrea mitchell, nbc's chief foreign affairs correspondent, host of msnbc's "andrea mitchell reports." she's been closely following the situation in syria. andr andrea, thank you for being with us. >> thank you. my pleasure. >> "the new york times" reporting tonight the president
is prepared to move unilaterally in syria even without our closest ally in britain. what are you hearing about this? >> we heard that actually, i heard that last night around midnight when it was becoming clear cameron was in trouble in response to my questions about the timing and whether the president would wait until after what we had thought would be a second british vote next week and after the g-20 when he gets back a week from tomorrow, gets back from st. petersburg and his trip to sweden. the message was, no, we will not have our hands tied by the u.n. and while we're sympathetic to david cameron's political situation, we will not wait upon the british. when they thought cameron was going to face a second critical vote next week, they were not going to hold back. the window, i believe is now because ban ki-moon called the president yesterday and said, please do not do this while the inspectors are still on the ground. he accelerated their departure. they're going to leave saturday, wrap up their inspections tomorrow. leave on saturday. so i would expect that the
window opens on sunday for sunday night time in syria. >> andrea, if the inspectors leave or finish their work tomorrow, ban ki-moon said they will be back on saturday, at least be making their report to him on saturday. does that mean they'll have an answer saturday as to whether or not chemical weapons were used and what those chemical weapons were? >> well, the u.s. said all along that because of all the shelling by the regime in the days after the attack, the chemical attack, which the u.s. says it is certain happened, because of that, they do not rely on the u.n. weapons inspectors to be able to conclude that chemicals were used because they say the soil was so degraded. the u.s. says it has its own evidence. we can talk about that in a sec. but they're not going to rely on this u.n. report. and the mandate of the u.n., as you seem to indicate in your question, is very limited as to whether chemicals were used, not who used them. >> andrea, the thing that is remarkable here, of course, is the elephant in the room here is
the example of iraq which we heard referenced today. >> absolutely. >> that eloquent british parliamentary debate. not believing that the u.s. inspectors will be able to determine whether or not chemical weapons were used. ahead of them actually stating that seems like it's got incredible chutzpa for a president who came into office who definitely won the democratic primary in part of him saying what was wrong with the rush to war in iraq and his respect for the international institutions that were flouted in the rush to that war. i find it hard to believe that this president won't wait to at least hear a we don't know from those inspectors that he'd rush before hearing anything. >> i think he will wait for their report, but he's not going to be mindful of it. i don't think -- i think he'll wait for a call from ban ki-moon to verbally tell him what he's heard from the briefing, but i think that means sunday. and that is when i suspect the window opens because the president leaves tuesday for sweden. unlikely that this would begin
while he's already in transit outside of the country and to go to st. petersburg to be on russian soil with putin, again repeating, the russians again repeated today a the united nations they will block new u.n. mandates. so let's tally the toll here. the president is going without his closest ally, britain. that was a shocker. he's going without the u.n. that was anticipated. he's going without the arab league, the white house says they didn't ask for arab league support, but it sure would have been a nice thing. so he's really going it alone. and that's the indication that, you know, mark landler and the "the new york times" team reported today. it's what we've been reporting. what chuck todd reported this morning on the "today" program. >> in terms of the president going out on that particular limb that you just described, particularly it was a very striking dep paparture from thed of foreign policy decisions and use of force decisions he sketched out as a sort of unspoken obama doctrine during his presidency thus far. what do you think he gets for
going so far out on that limb? he's not planning anything that would eliminate the possibility that syria would do this again. why go so far out on this limb by launching this strike? >> once they drew that red line, it was crossed obviously repeatedly, but on this scale that they had to take action, and that the credibility of the united states is at stake. their goal, they say, is to punish assad and deter him, but a lot of critics, democrats as well as republicans, say that that is not a legal reason to use military action. punishment. you need the legal predicate, number one, and that is not a wise mission. bill cohen i interviewed today, and he said we need to know what steps two, three, four and five are going to be and what is the larger strategy? and he should wait. tim kaine this morning, democratic senator, former democratic national chairman, saying the president should not be doing this, he should be
waiting. wait the week. get congress back. have consultations. bob casey believes there should be a strike. believes for very important to deter iran and to protect israel ultimately. but doesn't want it to be months of waiting for the u.n. but doesn't think it has to be this week, either. so there's a lot of criticism. mike rogers, the house republican intelligence chairman who is at times supportive of the administration, believes that there is a reason to take action but that it has not been well briefed. that a telephone briefing tonight for 26 members does not cut it. that they need a real classified briefing. the white house counterpoint is, come on back. don't be out in your districts raising money. come on back and do it in person. there's plenty of ways you can do it if you're here in washington. >> andrea mitchell, nbc news chief foreign affairs correspondent. thank you for that level of detailing and understanding. absolutely priceless. thanks, andrea. great to have you here. "an crdrea mitchell reports" ev
day on msnbc. with great power comes great responsibility unless you're the most powerful company in the history of powerful companies, then it's optional. that story's ahead. we raise black and red angus cattle. we also produce natural gas. that's how we make our living and that's how we can pass the land and water back to future generations. people should make up their own mind what's best for them. all i can say is it has worked well for us. do you mind grabbing my phone and opening the capital one purchase eraser? i need to redeem some venture miles before my demise. okay. it's easy to erase any recent travel expense i want. just pick that flight right there. mmm hmmm. give it a few taps, and...it's taken care of. this is pretty easy, and i see it works on hotels too. you bet. now if you like that, press the red button on top.
♪ how did he not see that coming? what's in your wallet? [ male announcer ] when you wear dentures you may not know it, but your mouth is under attack. food particles infiltrate and bacteria proliferate. ♪ protect your mouth, with fixodent. the adhesive helps create a food seal defense for a clean mouth and kills bacteria for fresh breath. ♪ fixodent, and forget it. ♪ we go, go, we don't have to go solo ♪ ♪ fire, fire, you can take me higher ♪ ♪ take me to the mountains, start a revolution ♪ ♪ hold my hand, we can make, we can make a contribution ♪ ♪ brand-new season, keep it in motion ♪ ♪ 'cause the rhyme is the reason ♪ ♪ break through, man, it doesn't matter who you're talking to ♪ [ male announcer ] completely redesigned
for whatever you love to do. the all-new nissan versa note. your door to more. ♪ yougood and close. discover the new way to help keep teeth clean and breath fresh. new beneful healthy smile food and snacks. he'll love the crunch of the healthy smile kibbles. you'll love how they help clean. with soft, meaty centers, and teeth cleaning texture healthy smile snacks help keep a shine on his smile. it's dental that tastes so good. new beneful healthy smile food and snacks.
shooting and dodging the occasional blood-thirsty zombie. in call of duty on your playstation 3. you know, as you do. it's all going great in call of duty until this happens. >> i wonder if that rock brought those freak bags. >> i wonder if that rock brought those freak bags. what was that big rock blob? to do we have that? he shoots the rock. what gives that rock that peachy glow? how could it have given rise to the freak bags? perhaps he should virtually shoot that and see if it virtually disintegrates or something. that shiny blob that sent the freak blob zombies into call of duty universe is a meteorite in the game made of ununpentium. though that's a game, that turns out to be an important detail in
today's news. freak bags or not. that story is coming up. it's great. hi! i'm rach. i started going pro a few weeks ago, using crest pro-health clinical rinse. i like to swish it around a little... and it's that easy! my mouth has never felt cleaner. [ male announcer ] go pro with crest pro-health clinical rinse. [ rachael ] i take really good care of my teeth, but i've definitely kicked it up a level this time. [ male announcer ] it's clinically proven to reduce plaque, freshen breath, and it's alcohol-free. dentist is on his way. he's gonna think that i'm seeing another dentist or something. [ male announcer ] go pro with crest pro-health clinical rinse. [ rachael ] i love my teeth. i could get used to this! [ rachael ] i love my teeth. nascar is ab.out excitement but tracking all the action and hearing everything from our marketing partners, the media and millions
of fans on social media can be a challenge. that's why we partnered with hp to build the new nascar fan and media engagement center. hp's technology helps us turn millions of tweets, posts and stories into real-time business insights that help nascar win with our fans. [ susan ] i hate that the reason we're always stopping is because i have to go to the bathroom. and when we're sitting in traffic, i worry i'll have an accident. be right back. so today, i'm finally going to talk to my doctor about overactive bladder symptoms. [ female announcer ] know that gotta go feeling? ask your doctor about prescription toviaz. one toviaz pill a day significantly reduces sudden urges and accidents for 24 hours. if you have certain stomach problems or glaucoma, or cannot empty your bladder, you should not take toviaz. get emergency medical help right away if your face, lips, throat or tongue swells.
toviaz can cause blurred vision, dizziness, drowsiness, and decreased sweating. do not drive, operate machinery or do unsafe tasks until you know how toviaz affects you. the most common side effects are dry mouth and constipation. [ susan ] today, i'm visiting my son without visiting every single bathroom. [ female announcer ] today, talk to your doctor about toviaz. and i quote, "it is tough to
bethe kind of year exxonmobil had in 201 1. exxon shares rose by 20 pk and profits surged 35% to over $41 billion." that's from the fortune 500 list of the world's most profitable companies. exxonmobil topped the list that year. that giant oil company posted profits of more than $41 billion. there wasn't even anybody close to putting up the sort of profits that exxon put up. that was 2011. quote fortune" magazine was slack jawed by exxon making $41 billion in profit in one year. slack jawed. until 2012 rolled around. epxon took the $41 billion in annual profit and turned it into a $44 billion annual profit in 2012. here's how fortune 500 described it when the list came out earlier this year. "in 2012, exxonmobil posted the second highest annual profit in u.s. history, surpassed only by
its own record from 2008. "so we got the record and to get the record we beat our old record which beat our old record before that. must be nice, right? exxonmobil just mints money. it is the most profitable corporation on the face of the earth by a mile. it's basically without rival. every time exxon posts record breaking profits they're breaking their own record breaking profits which held the previous report. from the start of this show, until the end of this show, exxonmobil will make somewhere in the vicinity of $5 million in pure profit for that one hour and they to that 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. that's why it was amazing, astounding to see this headline in arkansas. exxon to cut off housing assistance. five months ago today on march 2th, good friday, a giant exxon oil pipeline burst outside of little rock.
thick black tarsans cruise o s spilled into the streets, everywhere in the neighborhood forcing the evacuate of 22 houses along this block you see here. a number of those residents since that spill have been receiving temporary housing assistance from exxonmobil. it was exxon's pipeline that forced residents out of their homes so exxon had to put those people up somewhere else until it's safe for them to go back home, if it's ever safe for them to go back home. earlier this month exxon said they were cutting off most of those residents. sorry, i know we're the most profitable corporation the world has ever known, but we're done. you go home now. after exxon made that announcement, one of the local news stations in arkansas did a very smart thing. they went to the neighborhood in mayflower to see how much the neighborhood had returned to normal. here's what they found. >> i knocked on every door up and down this street today and found just two people who have moved back home since the oil spill. both of them called their
neighborhood now a ghost town. >> local residents and state officials raised heck about exxon forcing these residents back into a neighborhood that apparently nobody there deemed safe. exxon did reverse course. they said, okay, they no longer plan to cut off housing aid for those residents as of this weekend. they said they will continue to pay up though it's not yet clear for how long. exxon said since the spill, they, quote, honor all valid claims. if you ask me, i think the "arkansas times" should be considered for a pulitzer for their excellent and indispensable coverage of the mayflower oil spill since it first happened in march and continuing now. this was their cover story earlier this month titled "the forgotten." a 4,000 word reported piece about some of the victims of the exxon spill, specifically about people who didn't live in one of the couple of dozen homes that got evacuated after the pipeline erupted but who still live right in the area around where the spill happened. they interviewed a woman whose house is about 300 yards from the ruptured pipeline. she has remained persistently
sick since the spill with constant headaches and nausea. her 8-month-old grandson has been diagnosed with a respiratory infection and is now having to use a steroid inhaler twice a day. she says the oil went to the lake, but the toxic fumes came to us. in the weeks after the spill, state health officials assured local residents that overall air emissions remained below the levels likely to cause health effects. local residents in that area said they were having a much different experience. >> my whole family's been sick. shortness of breath. coughing. sore throat. headaches. i've had to go to the hospital. i'm still coughing. it's been almost six weeks. i'm sorry, i'm very emotional about this. i'm upset because exxon won't admit they have messed up. they're not doing what they're supposed to be doing to help the citizens of mayflower. >> remember, the people who live there had no idea the pipeline was there. until it burst. local residents there have been expressing anger not only toward
exxon but also toward elected officials in arkansas. on monday of this week, the congressman who represents that part of arkansas, republican tim griffin, he held a sort of outdoor town hall in mayflower. he was bombarded with questions from his constituents asking why their health concerns were not getting addressed. one resident told his congressman, tim griffin, "we have all been sick. i feel like we're all dogs chasing our tails around here. we're sick of it and need help." the congressman told that woman he would call the governor. today the governor of arkansas a announced the state health department will provide health assessments for residents in the area affected by the spill. you get to see a nurse in person and maybe as a follow-up get to see a doctor by videocamera. today in arkansas a federal judge finally set a trial date in the case of state of arkansas vs. exxonmobil. june 16th it will start. the state of arkansas versus the most profitable company on the face of the earth. joining us now for the interview
is the man who filed that lawsuit against exxonmobil on behalf of arkansas. the state's attorney general, dustin mcdaniel who i mistakenly called a republican earlier in the show but who is a democrat. mr. attorney general, sorry for that. thanks for being here tonight. i appreciate your time. >> thanks. it's great to be back with you. >> should mayflower residents have cause for concern about their health because of the aftereffects of this oil spill? i know you have been there, yourself, seen some of the aftermath and talked to some of the people who live there. >> i think they absolutely have grounds to be concerned about their health. i have been saying since day one, first of all, there should have been more than the 22 homes that were initially evacuated evacuated. i think that on the ground, health assistance should have been and continues to be provided. my office is -- i created, i think, only the 11th attorney general's office dedicated health care bureau in the country, and i've had my staff on the ground meeting with
residents and trying to disseminate information and trying to get help from the arkansas department of health. they don't actually work for me, so i'm very pleased that today governor bibi directed them to become more involved with providing assistance to those homeowners. there is no safe level of benzene to have in my living room, and i don't think that just because statistically an agent cy says it's okay to go he that moms and dads should feel comfortable going home. >> i went back today and looked at early press reports from right after it happened and looked at the way some of the exxon representatives handles questions what they were going to do with abject apologies, they were going to make everything right, they were going to see the community until it was back until it was whole. you have described that company's handling of the spill as coldhearted. what to you make of their response, overall, what do you make of them threatening to cut off houses aing aid to the resis
who were displaced by this spill? >> it is coldhearted. you were correct when you pointed out on june the 25th they said they were only going to go until september 1st, and after an enormous outcry, they backed off of that one day later, but it is important to now that they have, again, shifted course, and on august the 12th, they said only 30 days. so when they reversed course, they held firm for about two weeks, and as it stands today, the housing assistance that they currently provide for people who have been forced out of their homes and do not feel comfortable to take their children back home will end on september the 12th. and at that point, if people want to stay in a hotel, a mo l motel, a rented apartment or temporary housing, they're on their own. as far as i'm concerned, that's nothing but coldhearted litigation pressure tactics. i warned people they probably should expect more. >> mr. attorney general, we talked pretty quickly after the
spill had happened. you were here three days after the spill happened. i want to play this quick clip for you. this is how you laid out your pr priorities at that point in terms of what you wanted to learn about what had just happened. i'd love you to hear it and tell me if you've gotten the answers to any of these questions yet. here we go. >> i want to know how long was that rupture releasing oil into the ground before it finally saturated the ground so much before it came out above the surface? i want to know what the chemicals are in the mixture of this wabasika crude that has also been released into our environment. i want to know what they've done to cap it. i want to know the history of the inspections of the pipeline. i want to know who's going to secure the pipeline. >> how many of those -- that was three days after the spill. how many of those things do you feel like you have solid answers to now five months later? >> we have a lot of information that we didn't have at the time,
but one thing i have discovered is no matter what information is provided to us, it generally raises more questions than it answers. for instance, as i've always said, we want to know what caused the spill so that we can determine whether or not it's ever going to be safe to re-open this pipeline. and exxon has said in the reports that have been released that hook cracks in the pipe, itself, were caused by manufacturing defect, i guess after world war ii, but if you read the report closely, it also says that the use of the pipeline, which i presume to mean pressure settings and other factors, actually contributed to those cracks and to the release. and obviously in our litigation, whether or not the company was negligent is going to be a major factor in the level of penalties that they have to pay. so, yes, there's going to be a lot of discovery, a lot of
questions, and to the original point i think you're raising, of course, residents there suffering from ongoing health effects still yet don't know factually what they've ingested and exactly what they've been exposed to, and they don't know when, if ever, it would be safe to go home. >> attorney general, the state of arkansas, dustin mcdaniel, you have a heck of a fight on your hands with exxonmobil on this, sir. thank you for your time tonight. please keep us apprised. >> thank you. >> i appreciate it. all right. we'll be right back. she loves a lot of the same things you do. it's what you love about her.
but your erectile dysfunction - that could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you have any allergic reactions such as rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a 30-tablet free trial.
[ agent smith ] i've found software that intrigues me. it appears it's an agent of good. ♪ [ agent smith ] ge software connects patients to nurses to the right machines while dramatically reducing waiting time. [ telephone ringing ] now a waiting room is just a room. [ static warbles ] [ male announcer ] staying warm and dry has never been our priority. our priority is, was and always will be serving you, the american people. so we improved priority mail flat rate to give you a more reliable way to ship. now with tracking up to eleven scans, specified delivery dates, and free insurance up to $50 all for the same low rate. [ woman ] we are the united states postal service.
we have been covering the hard right turn in north carolina politics over the last few months, the state implementing what is the most draconian voting rights since the voting rights act was passed. we have continuously been pushing against that. last night in north carolina, in time to coincide with the march on washington, the naacp and student groups and others in north carolina staged protests in every congressional district in the state, in greenville, north carolina, it was several hundred people. in raleigh, north carolina, more than 400 people showed up. in silva, in the far northwestern part of the state, nearly hundred turned up.
in greenville, north carolina, check it out. almost 2,000 people rallied yesterday afternoon. in elizabeth city, where we did our show last week, a march was led by montravius king, a student who was blocked by officials saying he can't run for office, and presumably it means he can't vote either. the "i have a dream" speech prompted everybody to go back home and take the civil rights and voting rights act back to their home. well, every one of the 13 congressional districts in the state did just that. we'll have more on tomorrow's show. we'll be right back. ♪ [ male announcer ] we don't just certify our pre-owned vehicles. we inspect, analyze and recondition each one, until it's nothing short of a genuine certified pre-owned... mercedes-benz for the next new owner. ♪
hurry in to your authorized mercedes-benz dealer for 1.99% financing during our certified pre-owned sales event through september 3rd. but, dad, you've got... [ voice of dennis ] allstate. with accident forgiveness, they guarantee your rates won't go up just because of an accident. smart kid. [ voice of dennis ] indeed. are you in good hands? [ voice of dennis ] indeed. ♪ even superheroes need superheroes, and some superheroes need complete and balanced meals with 23 vitamins and minerals. purina dog chow. help keep him strong. dog chow strong. so, if you're sleeping in your contact lenses, what you wear to bed is your business. ask about the air optix® contacts so breathable they're approved for up to 30 nights of continuous wear. serious eye problems may occur. ask your doctor and visit airoptix.com for safety information and a free one-month trial. [ susan ] i hate that the reason we're always stopping is because i have to go to the bathroom.
and when we're sitting in traffic, i worry i'll have an accident. be right back. so today, i'm finally going to talk to my doctor about overactive bladder symptoms. [ female announcer ] know that gotta go feeling? ask your doctor about prescription toviaz. one toviaz pill a day significantly reduces sudden urges and accidents for 24 hours. if you have certain stomach problems or glaucoma, or cannot empty your bladder, you should not take toviaz. get emergency medical help right away if your face, lips, throat or tongue swells. toviaz can cause blurred vision, dizziness, drowsiness, and decreased sweating. do not drive, operate machinery or do unsafe tasks until you know how toviaz affects you. the most common side effects are dry mouth and constipation. [ susan ] today, i'm visiting my son without visiting every single bathroom. [ female announcer ] today, talk to your doctor about toviaz. [ male announcer ] from the last day of school, back to the first. they're gonna make everything from posters to do it yourself tattoos.
"call of duty," a wildly popular soldier game where you play a soldier in a battle. sometimes you're in world war ii, sometimes in a modern battlefield. sometimes you dcan play in a moe where you battle zombies or nazi zombies. if you're in that mode, the reason you're in that mode in the first place is a substance that is used to create the super zombies. element 115 is not really clear on how it works. or how it creates the zombies, but nobody cares. just shoot, shoot, oh, my god. turns out, and i know it is going to make me really unpopular, turnis out although zombies are not real, element 115 kind of is.
the periodic element of tables is sorted by numbers, they get a number of protons, number one--s hydrogen and helium, all of them existed in nature, and once they were discovered in nature they were given their proper place in the periodic table. but above 92, those are things you don't find laying around. they are things the earth doesn't make itself. above 92, you got to make those guys in a lab. the hallmark is that they do not stick around. you make them by smashing together other atoms, and you do make a new element, but you only make it for an instant, the new items last for seconds before they decay and they're gone. so if there were an element 115, it would be gone. right now it is being held by
this, a symbol uup, which is a fake latin way of saying 115, un-unpent, 115, you don't give it a real name until science says you can. you have to make the thing, document it so that science says you did. and apply the chemistry, same thing for physics. name it whatever you want, livermore or rachel or whatever. so ten years ago, the scientists created a few atoms. this week, step two, confirmation. scientists said they did it too. they smashed the calcium, it happened again. so now we are on to step three, waiting for sfsks. and if all goes well, the
un-unpentium will lose its place, and the scientists who created it will give it a new name. that said, the scientists theorizing about it, maybe they could just keep the name. the symbol u-up, everybody would just call it up, with steve kornacki. he could be the new face of the element, putting a handsome face and shine on it. keep it named up, come on. now it is time for "the last word" the lawrence o'donnell, have a great evening. a no from the british parliament on military action in syria, which begs the question, can the u.s. and prausesident oa go it alone? >> president obama makes his case for action in syria, this crisis in syria.
IN COLLECTIONSMSNBC West Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News Archive
Uploaded by TV Archive on