tv The Rachel Maddow Show MSNBC November 16, 2013 3:00am-4:01am PST
the money you spend here, stays here. in this place you call your neighborhood. small business saturday is november 30th. get out and shop small. . . the state of illinois is a bright, bright, bright blue state, right? and every one of the previous six presidential elections going back to 1992, illinois voted handily for the democratic candidate for president. and last year's presidential election, president obama won in his home state of illinois by 17 points. and that does not mean there are no republican areas and no republican members of congress in illinois. there are plenty of conservative parts of the state, but state-wide, illinois is very blue. which makes it all the more amazing that illinois has a senator, and of course, senators are elected statewide, illinois has a senator who is a
republican. senator mark kirk was elected to fill the seat that was once held by president obama. after the rod blagojevich scandal of the governor essentially trying to sell that seat, the scandal that ultimately put governor blagojevich in prison, republican mark kirk is the man who eventually got that seat. senator kirk is probably best known for the major health challenges that he has survived since becoming a senator. senator kirk suffered a major stroke in january 2012. it took him an entire year to recover enough to relearn how to walk. you might remember this very moving, dramatic footage of him returning to work for the first time. walking with great difficulty up the capitol steps where he was greeted by vice president joe biden and his fellow senator from illinois, dick durbin, and by his friend, west virginia senator joe manchin. but while senator mark kirk has been dealing with the physical rigors of coming back from that devastating stroke, he has also been fully functional as a senator. and he's been very interesting as a senator. because mark kirk is turning out
to be not a very predictable guy. he is a conservative in a lot of the traditional senses. he's anti-regulation and anti-tax guy. he's a hawk on foreign policy. he's supported privatizing social security. but he also sometimes takes positions where it's just senator mark kirk and the democrats. or it's just senator mark kirk and a handful of other republicans who are brave enough to defy their party and side with the democrats. like, for example, on the employment nondiscrimination act, senator kirk was not just one of the ten republicans who crossed party lines in order to support that anti-discrimination measure. he was a co-sponsor of the legislation. his very first speech of the floor of the senate once he came back from having a stroke was speaking in favor of that non-discrimination act. he's in the thumb up column on the issue of gay rights and discrimination, and a really interesting thing happened in the last few days involving
senator mark kirk's office. in the home state of illinois, there's a group called the world congress of families, they're headquartered in rockford, illinois. the world congress of families is not just an anti-gay group. they're not a run of the mill anti-gay group. they're a super mega double dutch really emphatically anti-gay group. when russia started passing all of its recent anti-gay legislation that has alarmed the whole world about russia taking this stark anti-gay turn right before they host the winter olympics, it was the world congress of families in rockford, illinois, that was not just applauding what russia was doing, they started sending american anti-gay activists to go to moscow to advise russia on how to improve their anti-gay legislation. to praise russia for what they were doing, to encourage them to do more. as a reward or a sign of support for how anti-gay russia has become, the world congress of
families is planning on holding an international summit next year at the kremlin, specifically because they are so psyched that russia hates gays so much more than they used to. so the world congress of families is based in illinois. and mark kirk's home state. and apparently, if you're an interest group of some kind and your group would like to hold a meeting in one of the rooms at the u.s. capitol, you just call up one of your home state senators and ask if they will book the room for you. i didn't think i knew that it happened this way, but apparently, this is a very common practice. and it's the kind of thing that happens frequently enough that it's handled at the staff level as a relatively routine level. so, mark kirk's office got the call. the world congress of families, okay, that's a fairly anodyne sounding name. they called senator kirk's office. and through his office, they booked meeting space at the united states capitol for today. the meeting they were planning on holding in the capitol was specifically to praise how anti-gay russia has become. and to strategize for how to get that kind of russian-style
anti-gay stuff happening over here. how to bring anti-gay policies from russia, also say uganda, other places that are real success stories for tormenting and abusing their gay populations, how can we use those examples to inspire similar good work in our country here in washington, d.c. that was the subject of the meeting. senator kirk's office had initially booked them that room for that meeting in the u.s. capitol. but then they realized who this group was. the google befell them. the senator's staff moved once they realized who these guys were. the senator's staff on their own recognizance moved to un-help this group, to rescind the offer of booking the room. they called the group and said this couldn't happen. this is interesting. this is a home state group and a republican senator. but senator kirk is not like that on these issues. and his office could not have
been clearer about this issue once they realized who this group was and what was going on. his office spoke with buzzfeed about the whole kerfuffle last week. buzzfeed broke the story. lester fetter there did. the statement from mark kirk's office was very blunt and very direct. quote, senator kirk does not affiliate with groups that discriminate. well, the specific group that does discriminate here, which senator kirk uninvited from the capitol, they were very, very angry about him uninviting him -- them from the capitol. they said, quote, obviously, senator kirk does not care about families and children. and freedom. and he has chosen to side with the policies of decline and death and disease promoted by the sexual radicals. shame on you, senator mark kirk, for allowing vocal radical sexual minorities to drown out the voices of the natural family. one of the anti-gay activists who was due to speak at the meeting went even further and
called him a coward for this decision. a coward. so that all went down last night. buzzfeed broke the story. got the statement from senator kirk's office. the group was uninvited. that was all last night. today, that group, that anti-gay group who called senator mark kirk a coward and everything. they did have their meeting at the u.s. capitol, because even though mark kirk rescinded his offer to set up a room for them when he realized who they were, another congressional republican decided to intervene, decided to help this group another room so they could have the meeting. the member of congress who did that is house speaker john boehner. what? i expected it be like, i don't know, louie gohmert or michelle bachmann, the ghost of jesse helms, but the actual speaker of the house, john boehner stepped up personally to make sure that that anti-gay group was well taken care of today at the united states capitol. your tax dollars at work. he's third in line to the presidency.
what? fred phelps from the westboro baptist church didn't need to use the room at that time? we didn't have any extra space for them. john boehner also made news this week by repeating his insistence that he will not allow the employment discrimination act come up for a vote in the house. right now, legally, you can't discriminate in employment in this country on the basis of race, gender, age, religion, national origin, disability, or genetic formation. the bill that would add sexual orientation and gender identity to the list of basis on which you cannot discriminate. right now in the majority of american states, if your boss hears that you're gay or decides that he or she thinks that you're gay, your boss can fire you on the spot for that reason and that reason alone. and you have no legal recourse, in a majority of american states. the senate overwhelmingly passed
a bill to fix that, with every democrat voting in favor of it and with ten republican senators, including mark kirk, crossing the aisle to beat the filibuster against it. 64 yes votes, but it will never become law, as long as john boehner will not allow it to be voted on in the house. and he says that is his decision. if that bill did come up for a vote in the house, it would most certainly pass. it is a really popular thing. not only did it get 64 votes in the u.s. senate, look at the public polling on this, overall, 73% of americans favor passing a law protecting gay people against workplace discrimination. it's favored by a huge proportion of democrats and a huge proportion of independents and also by a really big proportion of republicans. 60% of republican voters support this. a big, bright, clear majority of republican voters wants our country to have a law like this. but republicans in congress won't let it happen. and it turns out that that exact dynamic holds on a bunch of
things right now in washington. john boehner again this week insisted that he would also not allow a vote on immigration reform. and just like the nondiscrimination bill, immigration reform is super, super, super popular. it passed the senate with 14 republican senators crossing the aisle to vote with the democrats on it. it beat the filibuster handily. 68 votes. that shows you how noncontroversial and middle of the road that bill was. they had to make it that noncontroversial and middle of the road so it could pass with a 2 to 1 margin. overall, huge majorities of americans support immigration reform. 87% support reforming immigration and allowing a pathway to citizenship for immigrants who are here illegally. democrats, independents, and republicans are virtually identical in their huge -- look at that, overwhelming support for that big reform. there was just new polling specifically in republican swing districts. this was a new poll across 20 districts where republicans are
the representatives from those districts. and 76% of the people in those districts favor the pathway to citizenship, which is supposedly the most controversial part of immigration reform. so the president surely wants it, the senate wants it. democrats in congress want it. democratic voters want it. independent voters want it, and republican voters want it. who doesn't want it? oh, you guys. the only people who do not want it are john boehner and presumably some other house republicans. but they're against everybody else in the country. they're completely against public opinion on this issue, including the public opinion of republicans. they're also completely against public opinion on the issue of the minimum wage. overall, the number of people who say they want to raise the minimum wage is 76%. support for the minimum wage is massive among democrats and independents and among republicans. but even though their own voters support it, republicans in congress will not let it happen.
on background checks for guns, right? background checks for guns are supported by 81% of americans, broadly speaking. background checks had huge support among democrats, among independents, and look, among republicans. expanded background checks for gun purchases are supported by gun owners. expanded background checks are supported by nra members. but these guys in congress, the republicans in congress, say no. remember the buffett rule that said billionaires shouldn't pay lower tax rates than their secretaries? democrats support that, independents support that, republicans support that, just the republicans in congress say no, even though their own voters like the idea. i raise the idea of the buffett rule because supposedly after the government shutdown, remember what we were going to start working on? a grand bargain. what is our tax policy going to be, our budget going to be?
all supposed to be about debating policy measures, like, for example, the buffett rule, which is very popular, even among republican voters. but republicans in congress will not allow an issue like that to even be voted on, even though their own voters want it. and when you start looking at the public opinion polls on issue after issue after issue after issue, this is what is called a pattern. in representative democracy, if you are in an elected office and you pursue policies that are very unpopular and you block policies that are very popular, something is supposed to happen to you. it's like the elephant in the elephant's room. republican policy ideas, both in terms of what they like, but especially what they don't like, republican policy ideas are very, very, very, very strongly at odds with the views of the american people. with even most republican voters. they believe they have one winning issue on health reform, where their opposition to the president's health reform law is
closer to public opinion on the issue, which is still in flux. they think it's closer on that issue than every other major policy issue before the country right now where they stand against the rule of the public and even the rule of their own voters. why don't they pay a higher cost for that? and why haven't democrats figured out a way to make them pay a higher cost for that. joining now is congressman peter welch. democrat of vermont. he serves as the chief deputy w.h.i.p. thanks for being with us tonight. i appreciate your time. >> thank you. >> why don't republicans pay more of a price for blocking things in congress, particular in the house, but broadly speaking, in congress, that are so widely popular, even among their own voters? >> gerrymandering, the fact is a lot of republicans who take these extreme positions have a lot of support in the districts they represent. you know, in 2010 when the republicans won, and it was a reaction to the passage of the health care bill initially,
the -- they had select boutique districts where it is now the case that any republican who takes pragmatic steps towards compromise, which has become a four-letter word in washington, those folks face a primary. and that gerrymandering is so severe that in this last election, the democrats got a million and a half more votes than the republicans, and almost all and throughout our history, whatever party got the most votes nationally would be the majority in congress. that's not the case. so with this extreme gerrymandering, what you have are people who had been elected by folks whose views are to fight for failure on all of these policies. and that is a major challenge that this country has because we have to return, obviously, to a pragmatic approach to moving from here to where we need to get to. and that can include people with conservative and liberal views but who share a view that ultimately we've got to make some progress. >> republicans now seem to be
shelving the entire rest of their agenda. including some of their big priorities like tax reform and other stuff, simply to keep hammering away at the affordable care act, to keep hammering away at health reform because they think they've got such a winning issue there. obviously, if they prioritize that to the exclusion of all other issues, that's going to keep the focus on that as an issue. if they are able to get political advantage over the democrats on that issue for 2014, how come democrats haven't been able to get political advantage over the republicans on the stuff like minimum wage, background checks and these other issues that do even appeal, i would guess, even in gerrymandered districts? >> i think there's a couple reasons. one, the bully pulpit that used to be part of the presidential power has been greatly diminished. when i mentioned gerrymandering, it applies not just to congressional districts but also to news. it's very fragments. when franklin roosevelt sat down and had a fireside chat, 85% of
america would listen and there would be a continuation of the discussion. you had a news presentation where there would be an editorial function that was served so that america would be having a debate, but it would have some common facts. that's been greatly eroded. and it makes it much more difficult. then, when you add to it gerrymandering of districts so that folks who think that it's okay as a tactic to have america default on its bills have people who say keep at it, that's a problem. and then when you have essentially in congress a significant element of folks whose view is that institutions are really an impediment to the realization of each of us as individuals, of who we can be, then the fight for failure, the destruction of any governmental program, becomes proof for their point of view that government's bad. >> exactly.
that, if your argument is predicated on failure, and it is within your power to make failure happen, then you've got a spiral that ends in a dirty, dusty place for the country. congressman peter welch, chief deputy w.h.i.p. for the democratic caucus. lots ahead tonight, including something truly, truly crazy. eric holder's justice department did something today that even ted cruz thought was pretty excellent. and it turns out to be the best new thing in the world. stay with us. welcome back. how is everything? there's nothing like being your own boss! and my customers are really liking your flat rate shipping. fedex one rate. really makes my life easier. maybe a promotion is in order. good news. i got a new title. and a raise? management couldn't make that happen. [ male announcer ] introducing fedex one rate. simple, flat rate shipping with the reliability of fedex.
arguably the most controversial publisher in american history is astonishing everyone again, and this time, it's for an entirely new and completely non-pornographic reason. the interview tonight is going to be amazing. i will want you to stay with us, and i swear, i promise you, no porn at all. none. [ woman ] too weak.
wears off. [ female announcer ] stop searching and start repairing. eucerin professional repair moisturizes while actually repairing very dry skin. the end of trial and error has arrived. try a free sample at eucerinus.com. whoa! sweet mother of softness. paws off, pal. [ female announcer ] new charmin ultra soft is so soft, you can actually see the softness with our new comfort cushions. plus you can use up to four times less. enjoy the go with new charmin ultra soft. it's not the "limit the cash i earn every month" card. it's not the "i only earn decent rewards at the gas station" card. it's the no-games, no-signing up, everyday-rewarding, kung-fu-fighting, silver-lightning-in-a-bottle,
bringing-home-the-bacon cash back card. this is the quicksilver card from capital one. unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase, everywhere, every single day. so ask yourself, what's in your wallet? i have a couple motions i would like to make as amendments to this. >> no motions. >> clearly, committees do have an opportunity for people to amend the bill. i want to be able to present those. >> no, there's no motions. no, there's none, no. the great state of wisconsin has been under republican control, complete republican control, since 2011. and republicans' absolute power in the state has led to some amazing displays of force there. >> you're interrupting our roll call. sit down! right now! call the roll. >> senator carpenter.
coles. colin. >> you're interrupting our roll call. and it will not be tolerated. sit down. >> we learned later he actually broke the base of the gavel by banging it around like that that night. amazing. and it is entertaining to watch in a way, at least as a sort of spectacle, but in practical terms, democrats in wisconsin almost cannot stop anything that the republicans want to do because republicans have a lock on wisconsin state government. and it turns out a lot of what republicans want to do with their lock on wisconsin state government is try to change the rules in the state to make sure that they can stay in power for as long as possible. in the presidential election this year in wisconsin, the state voted for president obama. mitt romney picking wisconsin republican congressman paul ryan as his running mate didn't help statewide, and the democrats won the state by a seven-point margin. but if you only counted up the vote before election day, if you
only consider the votes of early voters in wisconsin, they were even more blue than the rest of the state. president obama won the state overall by seven points, but he won early voters by 17 points. in wisconsin, as in most places, if you voted early, you probably voted democratic. so obviously, that's got to go, right? before republicans took control of the state government in wisconsin, there was plenty of opportunity to early vote. early voting lasted three weeks and it always included three full weekends ahead of election day. once republicans took control, they cut that three-week early voting period down to two weeks and instead of three weekends for early voting, they cut it down to one weekend. but that is not enough, apparently, because last night in wisconsin, on the last night of the legislature before the shutdown, they shut down the session, republicans at the very last minute sprung a new bill to cut down early voting even further. so they have already cut it from three weeks down to two weeks and three weekends down to one weekend.
last night's bill will cut it further so there will be no weekends at all. and probably no chance for most people to get there after work during the week either. the bill they sprung on everybody last night would force every county clerk in the state to shut down early voting at 5:00 p.m. on every week day and offer no weekends at all. so no voting after work, no voting on weekends. the republicans moved that last night on the last day of the session, and they rammed it through on a party-line vote. wisconsin likes early voting. there's never been any kind of problem associated with wisconsin early voting, unless of course you consider the fact that most early voters vote democratic to be a problem. last night, wisconsin republicans also came up with a novel new twist on the state's draconian new voter i.d. law. at the same time that the republicans passed the first big cut to early voting, they also passed a law to require people to show new documentation in order to vote that wisconsin residents never had to show
before, and that not all legal voters in the state have. they passed that bill in 2011. it's been blocked in the courts ever since. but last night, late last night, as the last night of the legislative session crept past midnight and into the wee hours of this morning, the republicans in wisconsin came up with a new twist on their voting restrictions. now what republicans what you to do is they want you to declare when you vote if you are a poor person. and if you say that you are a poor person, that you do not have the right documentation to show to be allowed to vote because you cannot afford to get that documentation, then you have to sign a form swearing that you are poor. once you've done that, your ballot will get put in a separate pile from everybody else's and it will get marked as a challenged ballot. later on, local officials will consider your case and decide whether you really are poor, and if they're going to count your vote. sounds fair? sounds amazing.
and wisconsin republicans in the middle of the night last night passed that one, too. on a party-line vote. and that's where things really got weird. this is so strange, i'm not even quite sure how to explain it. um, in september, so not that long ago, a few weeks ago, the senate in wisconsin, which is also republican-controlled, they did something actually very nice. nice and totally non-controversial. it was so non-controversial that every single senator in the entire senate was a co-sponsor of the measure. what they did was they passed a resolution honoring the victims of the sandy hook elementary school shooting in newtown, connecticut. this resolution does not have any practical impact at all. it does absolutely nothing. it's just a statement of honor and respect from the people of wisconsin, which passed the senate unanimously in september. but for some reason, when the democrats last night in the assembly brought up that same resolution, so the assembly could pass it too and it could be done before the end of the session, for some reason, that
enraged the wisconsin republicans. why would that make you mad? i have no idea. here's how the "milwaukee journal sentinel" put it in a way that makes me think they didn't understand either. bitter disputes developed late thursday that sent the dispute into the early morning hours. tempers flared after democrats attempted to take up a bill honoring the children killed last year in sandy hook. republicans rejected taking that up. so republicans rejected taking up that resolution. they said they will not honor the victims at sandy hook. even being asked to do so last night made them very angry. how that could make somebody angry, i do not know, but apparently, it made them so angry that they then blew up the rest of the night and threw out the rest of the agenda everyone was expecting. tensioned flared after the democrats attempted to take up a
bill honoring the children killed last year in sandy hook. republicans rejected bringing it up and then advanced their bill on anti-abortion license plates even though they said earlier they would not take that up. that's what they had to do, voting on anti-abortion license plates which they weren't going to vote on at all until republicans got so angry about the resolution to honor the sandy hook kids that they couldn't contain their anger and all bets and all agreements were off and they went ahead with the anti-abortion thing. what? things in wisconsin seem a little out of control. i mean, wisconsin is supposed to be so sane, so civil, right? well, in the legislature, at least, since the republicans and governor scott walker took over in wisconsin, it seems more and more like wisconsin is losing its mind. and democrats, at least, last night just could not seem to believe it. >> we have people in this body that act as if they're in middle school and high school. and that decide they can change
the rules whenever they feel that they can. and it is extremely, extremely childish, stupid, asinine, and i could think of a whole lot of other words i would use. but i believe i probably would be censored. and let me tell you, i do know a few of those words and i know how to use them. >> i see that the speaker, the actual speaker is here on floor, and before he leaves, i would like to ask him a question if he could accept one. >> he's not at his assigned spot so he can't yield. >> would he -- i'm willing to wait until he gets into his assigned spot. >> it doesn't appear that he yields. >> is that serious? is he serious, the speaker of this house will not yield to a question for the one minute he's on the floor? >> it appears he does not. >> i mean, are you still in the room anywhere? where are you? >> gentleman will refrain. >> you know why i'm not going to refrain? because you guys are breaking your word. i'm going to ask robin voss,
i'm going to ask bill kremer, whoever i damn please, to stand up and explain your behavior to the public of the state of wisconsin, or get out of the way and let somebody else do the job. this is insulting. we act like children. >> the gentleman's out of order. >> that's too bad. >> god bless wisconsin. we talked on the show the other night about this thing calls wisconsin nice. and when we did that, we got pushback from some folks in minnesota where they claimed the whole nice thing actually really belongs to them. i believe there's enough nice for go around for wisconsin and minnesota, both. maybe even for ohio, too, and washington, d.c. but whatever used to be the normal expectations for normal middle of the road midwestern governance, those days really are gone. in wisconsin anyway, those days seem gone.
♪ [ male announcer ] united is rolling out global, satellite-fed wi-fi to connect you even 35,000 feet over the ocean. ♪ that's...wifi friendly. ♪ see, i knew testosterone could affect sex drive, but not energy or even my mood. that's when i talked with my doctor. he gave me some blood tests... showed it was low t. that's it. it was a number. [ male announcer ] today, men with low t have androgel 1.62% testosterone gel. the #1 prescribed topical testosterone replacement therapy increases testosterone when used daily. women and children should avoid contact with application sites. discontinue androgel and call your doctor if you see unexpected signs of early puberty in a child, or signs in a woman,
which may include changes in body hair or a large increase in acne, possibly due to accidental exposure. men with breast cancer or who have or might have prostate cancer, and women who are or may become pregnant or are breast-feeding, should not use androgel. serious side effects include worsening of an enlarged prostate, possible increased risk of prostate cancer, lower sperm count, swelling of ankles, feet, or body, enlarged or painful breasts, problems breathing during sleep, and blood clots in the legs. tell your doctor about your medical conditions and medications, especially insulin, corticosteroids, or medicines to decrease blood clotting. in a clinical study, over 80% of treated men had their t levels restored to normal. talk to your doctor about all your symptoms. get the blood tests. change your number. turn it up. androgel 1.62%.
this was the urgent front page of the gotham city chronicle today. batkid saves city. hooded hero nabs riddler, rescues damsel in distress. byline of the story it's by reporter clark kent. and sure enough, batkid was spotted doing heroic batkid rescuer things. before you crush my dreams and tell me that batkid is not real
and there's no paper called the gotham city chronicle, before you crush my dreams, just hold on, because there is more ahead to be revealed. an action-packed edge-of-your-seat stuff. and frankly, the kind of thing for which the whole idea of the best new thing in the world today was invented in the first place. oh, so great. we have the footage that you really, truly want to see. that's coming up and it is the single best thing i can do to send you into your weekend tonight. it's so great and it's coming up at the end of the show. stay with us. i got this. [thinking] is it that time? the son picks up the check? [thinking] i'm still working. he's retired. i hope he's saving.
last month, the texas department of criminal justice received this kind of remarkable letter from a local pharmacy. dear sirs and madam, i'm the owner and pharmacist in charge of the woodlands compounding pharmacy. based on the phone calls i had with the texas department of criminal justice regarding its request for these drugs, it was my belief that this information would be kept on the down-low. i'm not making it up, that's what it says in the letter. it was my belief this information would be kept on the down-low, and it was unlikely it would be discovered that my pharmacy provided these drugs.
had i known that this information would have been made public, i never would have provided the drugs. the texas prison system got that letter after they had struck i guess a halfway secret deal with this one pharmacy to get lethal injection drugs for texas's many, many executions of state prisoners. when the name of the pharmacy and what they were doing was made public, the pharmacy decided they no longer wanted to go through with it. texas is number one when it comes to the death penalty, but a lot of states have been having trouble getting the drugs they use to kill their prisoners. many of the companies that make the drugs no longer want their drugs to be used for that purpose. so companies are refusing to sell states these drugs that they have been selling them for years. so texas is on the down-low with a local compounding pharmacist. ohio had an execution scheduled for this week until it was delayed to see if the prisoner might be able to donate his organs. before the delay, though, ohio
had said its stock of execution drugs in that state was rapidly expiring and they were looking for new sources. so, who knows what that means for the delay. now in missouri, a new execution protocol is being set up to be used for the first time this month. the department of corrections there is flat-out refusing to say where they're getting their supply of lethal injection drugs. they also will not say anymore what medical professionals are involved in the process of carrying out the killing. now, we've always had fights about the death penalty forever, since like the bible, right. but this new issue about finding the drugs to kill people with and in missouri, the secrecy around the drugs and the protocol by which they're going to be administered, this is a whole new wrinkle in the fight. but in missouri specifically, there's an even newer, even weirder wrinkle in the state's next planned killing. and the new weird thing missouri has to contend with is "hustler"
magazine. and the publisher of "hustler" magazine. the publisher of "hustler" magazine, of course, is almost as famous at the magazine itself. he's larry flynt. in 1978, "hustler" magazine published a photo spread featuring an interracial couple, or least an interracial coupling. at the time that spread came out, a excite supremacist neonazi serial killer was in the midst of a multistate killing spree that involved him singling out his victims on the basis of race and religion. he shot two young cousins in cincinnati just because they were black. he confessed to shooting civil rights activist vernon jordan because he says he saw mr. jordan near a white woman. that one was in indiana. again and again, he specifically sought out interracial couples to attack and murder. and when he saw that interracial pornographic feature in "hustler" magazine, the neonazi
serial killer decided "hustler" magazine publisher larry flynt also had to die. so the neonazi serial killer essentially stalked larry flynt, tried to find a place where he might be able to kill him. he learned that larry flynt was going to be in a courthouse in georgia, appearing in one of his many, many trials for obscenity. and joseph paul franklin went to that courthouse and laid in wait. and when he had larry flynt in his sights, he shot him with a hunting rifle. he paralyzed mr. flynt from the waist down for life. that was 35 years ago. when police finally caught up with the killer, they tried and convicted him for eight different murders. although he says he killed many more than that, he says he killed upward of 20 people. they never prosecuted mr. franklin specifically for shooting larry flynt, but he confessed to that shooting and he was sentenced to death for his other crimes, and he is the killer for whom the state of missouri is now refusing to say exactly what they're going to do as their means of killing him. they will not say what it is they're going to use to end his life, where they got it, or who will administer it or how.
the state has set an execution date for him for wednesday of next week. and now larry flynt, larry flynt, publisher of "hustler" magazine, is working with the aclu to try to stop the execution. larry flynt fighting to save the neonazi who shot and paralyzed him. he is our guest for the interview tonight. stay with us. seriously. heart healthy, huh?! ugh! actually progresso's soup has pretty bold flavor. i love bold flavors! i'd love it if you'd open the chute! [ male announcer ] progresso. surprisingly bold flavor for a heart healthy soup.
but a block from the courthouse, and minutes before the trial was to resume, flynt and one of his lawyers were shot. witnesses said a gunman emerged from a car and fired two shots. one hitting flynt in the stomach. the other bullet struck lawyer gene reeves in the side. the men were rushed to the hospital and immediately sent to surgery. both are listed in critical condition. >> that was nbc nightly news on
the day that "hustler" magazine's larry flynt was shot outside a georgia courtroom. the man who confessed to shooting him, joseph paul franklin, is now on death row for convictions in a string of murders in the 1970s. that were motivated by his neonazi and white supremacist beliefs at the time. he's scheduled to be executed in missouri next week, but larry flynt, one of this man's victims, is now working with the aclu to try to stop that execution. joining us now to explain why is larry flynt. he's here for the interview. mr. flint -- flynt, it's a real pleasure to have you here. thank you for joining us. >> hi, rachel. >> why do you want to stop this execution? >> you know, when i wrote that piece for "the hollywood reporter," i didn't expect it to go viral. you know, i have been against the death penalty for as long as i can remember. i just don't think we should be in the business of killing people for lives that we're trying to protect. >> is there part of you -- is there part of you for which it
is difficult to separate that long-held political belief of yours from, i would guess, an understandable anger, desire for vengeance against the guy who put you in a wheelchair for life? >> no, because i'm very pragmatic. you know, if you're a victim of someone who has committed a crime like murder or something, i can understand why you would want to see someone put to death, but when you really take time to think about the fact that our system was supposed to be about justice, not vengeance. and when someone sets out to commit a crime like murder, they don't stop and think, well, am i going to get life in prison or am i going to get the death penalty if i do this? that's not the way they think. it's not a deterrent. it never has been. and, you know, in england in the 18th century, pick pocketing was a capital offense, and they used to hang the pick pockets every saturday in the town square, and
while they were doing it, people would be going through the crowd, picking the pockets of the people watching the pick pockets getting hanged, so i think the british caught on early, that capital punishment was not a deterrent. and when you look at the biggest proponents in the world of capital punishment, the three biggest are iran, the united states, and china. why do we want to be lumped in with them barbarians? i can understand, you know, people wanting justice. i just don't understand vengeance. it's much, much tougher on a guy if you give him -- put him in a 3x6 cell for the rest of his life, rather than sniff his life out with a lethal injection in a matter of seconds. but, of course, how they're putting these people to death, i want to remind you, rachel, that a few years ago down in florida, they were having trouble with the electric chair. they kept hiding the issue because people were burning up,
getting caught on fire. there was a lot of suffering. they weren't dying right away. i think florida has solved that problem by now. but if they're going to continue to use the death penalty, there needs to be more transparency. i think we're entitled to it. >> your effort with the aclu, the legal filing you made in the case it to try to get missouri to unseal documents and explain what they're doing. is that basically the leverage you've got. to try to slow it down 1234 do you think that would make a difference against the death penalty? >> no, i think it will make a difference. because the more attention we get, you know, anesthesiologists are supposed to be administering the drugs. they're supposed to be board certified. they're not supposed to be killing people for fun. i think that needs to be exposed.
>> larry flynt, very kind to this show and generous to us over the jeers. -- years. in terms of your willingness to come and be here and talk to us. thank you for helping us to understand this tonight, sir. >> thank you, rachel. >> i appreciate it. all right. if you are in need of a little feel good in your life. a little watch it alone in case you cry material. there is a best new thing in the world that took most of a huge american city to pull off. it is amazing. it is coming up. we have footage you have not seen. please stay with us.
on >> joker. riddler, penguin. your reign of terror in gotham city is over. best new bat thing in the world, straight ahead. pow! welcome back. how is everything? there's nothing like being your own boss! and my customers are really liking your flat rate shipping. fedex one rate. really makes my life easier. maybe a promotion is in order. good news. i got a new title. and a raise? management couldn't make that happen. [ male announcer ] introducing fedex one rate. simple, flat rate shipping with the reliability of fedex.
and you work hard to get to the next level. it feels good when you reach point b, but you're not done. for you, "b" is not the end. capella university will take you further, because our competency-based curriculum gives you skills you can apply immediately, to move your career forward. to your point "c." capella university. start your journey at capella.edu.
but at least i can help keep their underwear clean. with charmin ultra strong. i'll take that. go get 'em, buddy! [ female announcer ] charmin ultra strong has a duraclean texture and its four times stronger than the leading bargain brand. enjoy the go with charmin ultra strong. best new thing in the world today. truly is. it started a couple weeks ago, the make a wish put out the call for volunteers to help a kid named miles. this is miles. he is 5. he's been battling leukemia for more than half his life. his leukemia is in remission, a good thing. when the make a wish people asked him what his wish was. he said he wanted to be a super hero, batman. or maybe, batkid. but i probably do not have to
tell you an of this, because if you own a computer machine or any sort of device that hooks you to social media, this is what it looked like this afternoon if you set your tweet deck for #sfbatkid. don't stare at it you will go blind. all the interest, overwhelmed the make a wish website. we are currently experiencing technical difficulties, due to interest in the batkid wish. please check back. that's just the virtual world's response. in the regular world, thousands, literally thousand of people brought their actual physical bodies to the streets of san francisco today. transforming san francisco for a few hours today into gotham city. and miles, costumed as batkid, as the caped crusader's mini-me, he knew he would spend the day in character. he did not know how elaborate it would get. his experience started with a breaking news bulletin and a televised appeal from san francisco's actual police chief. >> gotham city needs you, batman.
this is police chief greg suhr, only hoping you can hear my voice. it is critical that you call me right now. we have a damsel in distress. but that's just the beginning, batman, just the type of the iceberg the you have to call me it is urgent. please, caped crusader, we need you. and -- bring the batkid. >> and he wasn't kidding. miles in costume got to ride in a batmobile, he helped rescue a woman tied to a bomb on the cable car tracks, he foiled a bank robbery resulting in the arrest of the riddler, oh, yeah. but his work was still not done. while miles was eating lunch, crowds of volunteers called on him to rescue the san francisco giants mascot, lou seal, who had been kidnapped by the penguin. miles heard the call, freed the seal, and yes -- yes, helped nab the penguin. resulting in the most awesome fake document.
and then for his super heroism. miles was awarded the key to the city. he also got congratulations from the white house. president obama, even vined him his presidential thanks. >> way to go, miles, way to save gotham. way to go, miles, way to save gotham. >> basically the city of san way to go, miles, way to save gotham. >> basically the entire city of san francisco went nuts today. so did everybody who could not be there in person, but who cheered it all on, online. here is why this is the best new thing in the world today, aside from the first and most obvious reason, which its that a kid who has had to fight for his life is getting something that he really wanted. another reason, this is great, is that truth is when people are faced with awful things, the specter of awful things including sickness and death, even in children, the seeming inevitability of darkness and destructs, you know what people want to do? they want to help. not just a desire to help. there is a specific thing you can do and it might help. people do it. people help.
they go out in the streets. they do what they chance. they do what they can. that impulse, that humane impulse, engulfed a major u.s. city this afternoon. that's the best new thing in the world today. oh, my god is it. that does it for us tonight. have a great weekend. good night. what's next the health care fight? could it damage the president's signature law? we'll have a live update coming up next. dr. nancy sniderman on the ground in philippines. the price of gas is reaching lows that haven't been seen in a while. how low could it go and why now? unraveling a mystery. gold in ft. knox. i'll talk to the author.