tv The 11th Hour With Brian Williams MSNBC September 22, 2018 8:00pm-9:00pm PDT
testify next week, and chuck grassley had not responded to his own arbitrary deadline that he set for 10:00 p.m. tonight. that's tonight's last word. "the 11th hour" with brian williams starts now. tonight we're covering the bombshell from "the new york times," deputy ag rod rosenstein reported to have considered invoking the 25th amendment, suggested wearing a wire to record the president. he has issued a second denial tonight and donald trump reportedly is already asking advisers if he should fire them. plus christine blasey ford asking for more time to decide whether to testify after the president lashed out at ford on twitter for not reporting the alleged assault when it happened. and the trump about-face today on declassifying those documents in the russia investigation. "the 11th hour" on a friday night begins now. good evening once again from
our nbc news headquarters in new york. day 610 of the trump administration. there is an avalanche of news as america heads into yet another weekend. we have just learned that attorneys for dr. christine blasey ford have asked senate judiciary committee members for more time to decide if she will testify about her accusation against supreme court nominee and federal judge brett kavanaugh. we'll have much more on that still developing story just ahead. the other story we're covering tonight, this explosive report from "the new york times" about deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. he, of course, the one in charge of the mueller investigation. "times" reporters adam goldman and michael schmidt report that rosenstein considered secretly recording president trump and even discussed invoking the 25th amendment to remove trump. goldman and schmidt write, quote, mr. rosenstein made these suggestions in the spring of '17 when the firing of james comey plunged the white house into
turmoil. he made the remarks about secretly recording mr. trump and the 25th amendment in meetings and conversation with other justice department and fbi officials. several people described the episodes in interviews over the past several months. the people were briefed either on the events themselves or on memos written by fbi officials, including andrew mccabe. then the acting bureau director. the article continues, quote, none of mr. rosenstein's proposals apparently came to fruition. it is not clear how determined he was about seeing them through, though he did tell mr. mccabe he might be able to per said attorney general jeff sessions and john kelly, then the secretary of homeland security, now the white house chief of staff to mount an effort to invoke the 25th. the "times" adds rosenstein was serious in raising the idea of wearing a wire himself to secretly record the president somehow and he mentioned it on a different occasion.
justice department officials tell nbc news that rosenstein's remarks were not meant seriously, according to a senior doj official at a meeting may 16 of 2015. quote, rosenstein was arguing with andrew mccabe about the president according to a senior justice department official. well, what do you want me to do, andy? wear a wire, rosenstein asked at the meeting, which also included fbi lawyer lisa page and four doj officials. this official and a source in the room characterized rosenstein's remark has sarcastic. another told nbc news rosenstein was making a serious comment and the doj official also tells us there was a brief mention of the 25th amendment with a note written by former fbi deputy director andrew mccabe and that rosenstein didn't raise the matter. tonight rosenstein released this
statement. quote, i never pursued or authorized recording the president and any suggestion that i have ever advocated for the removal of the president is absolutely false. andrew mccabe's attorney has also responded to the "times" account which cited his memos. in a statement that reads in part, the attorney gave all his memos, classified and unclassified to the special counsel's office. a set of those memos remained at the fbi at the time of his departure late january of '18. he has no knowledge of how any member of the media obtained those memos. mccabe, you will recall, fired earlier this year after relentless attacks by the president in an apparent effort to discredit the bureau's work on the russia investigation. during a rally in springfield, missouri, earlier this evening, the president had this to say about federal law enforcement. >> just look at what is now being exposed in our department of justice and the fbi. look at what's going on. look at what's going on.
and i want to tell you, we have great people in the department of justice. we have great people. these are people i really believe you take a poll, i got to be at 95%. but you have some real bad ones. you've seen what happened at the fbi. they're all gone. they're all gone. they're all gone. >> but there's a lingering stench and we're going to get rid of that too. >> on that note, joining us by telephone, michael schmidt with the "new york times" and happens to be coauthor of this "times" article in question. so michael, you chose to focus on these eight days in 2017. remind us how alarmed rod rosenstein was at that period and what heightened his alarm. >> well, rosenstein was unthey needed. he had played a significant role
in the comey firing, he provided the memo the white house uses as the rationale for it. then rosenstein was being criticized sharply for basically helping create what was believed to be a fake story about why they fired him, and rosenstein sort of lost it. he became unnerved. he was very emotional. he was very upset. he said things that were at times irrational and didn't really add up with what was going on around him. in that period of time he discussed two things that we found particularly interesting. one of them was about wearing a wire, and the other was about the 25th amendment. for us this provided a window into what was going on at the justice department at this crucial time as the justice department made the ultimate decision, the extraordinary decision of appointing a special counsel to investigate the president of the united states. >> how long have you been reporting out this story? weeks? months? >> we've been looking at this issue for months. this is something -- this is for the time time forgot. the period has been overlooked
because it ends with mueller being appointed and the story goes in an entirely new direction. but we've been looking at this for months and trying to figure out what happened there. when we felt comfortable with the information we had, we moved forward with our story. >> in light of rosenstein's second denial, the statement we quoted just a few minutes ago was statement number two put out subsequently tonight. because it's all about context, are you certain you and your coauthor that you got the context right on serious versus sarcasm? >> yes. and there's a particular reason why. in the meeting rosenstein was asked are you, serious? and he said, yes, i am. and then proposed wiring up fbi officials who were going in to meet with the president to be the fbi director. other folks have gone for the
notion that that was sarcastic, that it was just a joke, but rosenstein also brought it up later in the day. those two pieces of information led us to a point where we said, look, this was a serious thing, and that's the reason we wrote the story the way we did. >> michael schmidt, coauthor of tonight's story in "the new york times," that is our lead story on this broadcast tonight. thank you so much as always, for joining us. we want to, with that, bring in our lead-off panel on a friday night. julia ainsley, national security and justice reporter for nbc. jeremy bash, former chief of staff at cia and the pentagon. and matthew miller, former chief spokesman for the justice department. jeremy, i would like to begin with you, quoting "the washington post" tonight, we'll put it up on the screen. this statement came after white house officials pressured the justice department to issue a more forceful denial according to an adviser who spoke to the president. the president asked advisers friday if he should fire
rosenstein and some of those around trump sought to sway him not to make any decision friday night. during those discussions the president said he did not trust rosenstein or mccabe, the adviser said. what's your takeaway from all of this at this hour, jeremy? and what are you expecting to see tomorrow over the weekend? >> i think we got pretty close tonight to a friday night massacre. people have been saying all night that the president has the justification he needs now to fire rod rosenstein. i think it's important to say no, he does not. this was information about conversations that happened during one meeting or a series of meetings in may 2017 before the mueller investigation was kicked off, before any of us knew about the trump tower meeting, before the indictments of manafort and gates and papadopoulos and flynn and before the indictments of senior
russian officials who interfered in the 2016 election. and i actually would argue that if anything, rod rosenstein's view of the situation probably has grown darker as the conspiracy has unspooled and as the obstruction unfolded. even more so tonight more than ever, we need to have an independent investigation that's led by bob mueller and that's protected from politics from 1600 pennsylvania avenue. >> let's talk about one rod rosenstein, julia. had it not been for this era we're living with, he likely would have just retired as a career public servant at the justice department with what was considered a terrific career having gone to harvard law school after all. derided by the president as mr. peepers, he is then put in this awkward position providing the cover story for the firing of comey, that he was somehow mean to hillary clinton,
the awkward position of being a potential witness and then speaking of awkward positions, maybe nominating himself to play donnie brasco in the same movie. so here we are. tell us about the rod rosenstein you've been reporting on. >> brian, i've been reporting on him for some time. the first time i ever spoke to rod rosenstein he was a u.s. attorney in maryland. we were talking about gang violence. that was a position he loved to be in, and then he got thrown into the spotlight in this job. i've been following the evolution of rod rosenstein, especially from people close to him and in legal circles in washington. at this particular time michael schmidt and his colleagues have focused on, he was incredibly vulnerable, especially to the criticism of people who he wanted respect from. these are people who were very critical of his decision to fire jim comey and he immediately felt the need to appoint the special counsel in order to vindicate himself. and he thought history would prove him right to fire jim comey.
later he changed a little bit. he wasn't quite as vulnerable or emotional. he kind of got his backbone back. we saw that this summer as he started to speak up and stand up against the president several times, coming into the oval office with the fbi director, christopher wray, in solidarity, showing they were going to protect the identities of people in a lot of these memos that the justice department had used to justify the mueller investigation. he stood up for the department and for the fbi, and for that the rank and file have thanked him. now he is again in an awkward position because as we go to the 2018 midterms, rosenstein could be in the position where he would have to tell robert mueller whether or not to publicly charge someone who could be close to the trump inner circle and then be in violation of this kind of unwritten but very much understood rule of the 60 to 90-day rule. how closing you could get to an election that could be
interfering. so rosenstein could again be in an awkward place. but it's important to realize that the rod rosenstein that we saw at that time isn't necessarily the rod rosenstein that we know today. and so jeremy is absolutely right. the president would be looking at a different rod rosenstein if he chose the comments he made in may of 2017 as validation for firing him. >> now jeremy just made the point we may have come very close to a friday night massacre. if this were espn, this piece of video i'm going to show you would be number one on the countdown. i want to show you this. this is sean hannity tonight on fox news directly to camera and speaking to just one viewer. >> i have a message for the president tonight. under zero circumstances should the president fire anybody, these actors tonight, and i've had multiple sources confirming this, and more information coming. they are hoping and praying that the president does just that. they're hoping he gets mad, that
he gets sick and tired of it, and that they can turn this politically into their equivalent of a friday night massacre. the president needs to know it is all a setup. he needs to know that regardless of whether he steps in or not, and i would argue he definitely should not, the deep state tonight is crumbling from within at this very hour. >> matt miller, longtime deep state member, what do you make of it? >> brian, i think we're in trouble when sean hannity is the voice of reason. the conspiracy theory at the end of that, that's pretty farfetched, but i think what you see there is a little bit of panic from someone who knows the president well, that knows how the president is likely to react to a story like this. he's going to be angry. you couldn't engineer a story in a lab more likely to enrage the president when you have suggestions, number one, that someone who is in his administration, who he expects to be absolutely loyal broach the idea of wearing a wire in the oval office. and number two, broach the idea
of trying to remove him from office. that is likely to set the president on fire. remember, the president has been back and forth with rosenstein for a long time. last summer he tweeted out that he couldn't believe he was being investigated for firing the director of the fbi by someone who told him to fire the director of the fbi. a clear reference to rosenstein. there were worries then he was going to fire him. that relationship seemed to improve lately. he told "the wall street journal" a month ago that rosenstein was fantastic now. so they've been off and on over the years, and rosenstein has clearly tried to pull the president back from making harmful decisions that would hurt national security by releasing classified information and other things. but if you look at this story today, it very much has to put rosenstein in danger. when the president gets back from this trip he's on, has time to sit and stew over the weekend and start tweeting over the weekend, you have to wonder if rosenstein can survive this. >> may be worse, he's going to bedminster, new jersey. but more on that later. hey, julia,
i have a highlight for you. this got our attention. this happened on nicolle wallace's broadcast this afternoon, someone we all know, frank figliuzzi of the fbi was talking in the moment as the story about what this may mean for the time remaining over target for the mueller team. >> i have to tell you, their time is shrinking. they have an even shorter shelf life today because i believe this is going to eventually result in rosenstein's removal, sessions' removal, perhaps even faster than we realized, and that means that mueller's tenure is very limited. >> julia ainsley, we have to remember things are moving fast. that is a viewpoint that many people will hold going into the weekend. >> yeah, that's absolutely right, but i think that robert mueller did something smart here, he actually broke up a lot of pieces of this investigation and put them in attorneys offices around the country. we know that sdny, eastern
district of new york, eastern district of virginia, these are places where pockets of this investigation already have branched off. michael cohen holds a lot of that when he goes to manhattan federal court. even if rod rosenstein overseeing mueller, if both of those two people keep people in all of this investigation and then the fight for the truth disappears overnight, there are enough documents put in u.s. attorneys' offices around this country that the president cannot get to. and as i understand, that was a direct strategy from robert mueller. he wanted to be sure that with the political pressure that he has seen mounting for some time, it's not like tonight is the first time we've seen this. it's certainly ramping up the pressure. he wanted to make sure the documents and communications and all the witness testimony he's gathered would be safe and the u.s. attorneys offices rather than in main justice, which seemed to be under peril. >> important point to make. jeremy bash, i want to take you way back in history to this morning, and the president's rather stunning decision that
got swamped as often happens with all the other news to reverse himself on the declassification of documents and communications including text messages from doj and fbi. what do you know about this? what can you infer about this? >> some of us who watched this story unfold foresaw a principled patriotic rebellion inside the intelligence community saying mr. president, declassifying our most sensitive secrets for political gain is not how we run things, it's dangerous for national security, and it's not going to happen on our watch. they pushed back and it appears they have won over the president. the president had to back down embarrassingly with his tail between his legs and say uncle. i think the professionals have to be yielded to in this one rare instance. >> matt miller, i'm duty-bound to end with this question to you. if someone breaks glass over the
weekend and if rosenstein gets fired, what chain of events does that trigger, and most immediately who takes over? >> the line of succession will go to the solicitor general, noel francisco. kind of a career member of the conservative establishment here in washington. he's the government's chief who argues cases in court. if the president will move on robert mueller to fire rosenstein or to fire sessions and try to take control of the probe, the next step is harder to accomplish, finding someone who will carry out an obviously illegitimate order, to either fire mueller or to somehow circumscribe the probe, to prevent it from going forward and pursuing lines of inquiry. that is a tough thing to do because i don't know who on the staff will help him do that. don mcgahn who's been talking for 30 hours administrate special counsel, he's not going to want to touch that.
he'll know the legal peril it would put him in. it's hard to see john kelly touching that. i don't know how the president pulls that off all on his own or who on his staff that knows the justice department and knows the kind of ins and outs that would help him do something that difficult to pull off. and at what would be a time of great political peril and a real uproar in the country. >> to our viewers and guests, thank you for riding with us. we're covering a number of topics in realtime. julia ainsley, jeremy bash, and matt miller. our big three on a friday night. i can't thank you enough for your contributions to the coverage of these stories. coming up for us, what happens to tonight's deadline for the accuser of a federal judge? our up-to-the-minute coverage continues. later, are we waiting for a shoe to drop at the justice department this weekend? "the 11th hour" getting under way on a friday night. does this map show the peninsula trail? you won't find that on a map. i'll take you there.
take this left. if you listen real hard you can hear the whales. oop. you hear that? (vo) our subaru outback lets us see the world. sometimes in ways we never imagined. carla is living with metastatic breast cancer, which is breast cancer that has spread to other parts of her body. she's also taking prescription ibrance with an aromatase inhibitor, which is for postmenopausal women with
hormone receptor-positive her2- metastatic breast cancer as the first hormonal based therapy. ibrance plus letrozole was significantly more effective at delaying disease progression versus letrozole. patients taking ibrance can develop low white blood cell counts, which may cause serious infections that can lead to death. before taking ibrance, tell your doctor if you have fever, chills, or other signs of infection, liver or kidney problems, are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant. common side effects include low red blood cell and low platelet counts, infections, tiredness, nausea, sore mouth, abnormalities in liver blood tests, diarrhea, hair thinning or loss, vomiting, rash, and loss of appetite. carla calls it her new normal because a lot has changed, but a lot hasn't. ask your doctor about ibrance. the #1 prescribed fda-approved oral combination treatment for hr+/her2- mbc.
as we've reported earlier tonight, lawyers for brett kavanaugh's accuser, dr. christine blasey ford, asked the judiciary committee for one more day to decide if she would testify next week. as we've reported, dr. ford has accused kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her at a party back in the '80s, an allegation kavanaugh has denied. republicans on the committee had set this deadline for 10:00 p.m. tonight for ford to respond to a counteroffer she issued earlier today on the conditions of her testimony. chuck grassley said in a statement tonight if ford did not respond by the deadline or she decided not to testify,
committee was going to go ahead and schedule a vote on kavanaugh on monday. on thursday ford's legal team laid out some requests of the committee before she would testify. now, earlier today in what has already become a public negotiation, republican senate counteroffer to ford saying the hearing would be wednesday. ford would testify first, followed by kavanaugh. there would be no other witnesses called. an outside counsel would do the questioning. ford asked for the hearing to take place on thursday. she wanted kavanaugh to testify first. she had asked for mark judge to be called as a witness. she also asked for senators to do the questioning. the committee agreed to some of her requests like not having to testify with kavanaugh present and making every effort to guarantee her safety. for the most part president trump has held back in attacking dr. ford over her allegation against judge kavanaugh.
that ended this morning when we read this. i have no doubt that if the attack on dr. ford was as bad as she says, charges would have been immediately filed with local law enforcement authorities by either her or her loving parents. i ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place. meanwhile, put all of this talk of another hearing to the side for a moment as mitch mcconnell apparently already has. here is what he promised his audience today at the value voters summit. >> you watched the fight. you've watched the tactics. but here's what i want to tell you. in the very near future, judge kavanaugh will be on the united states supreme court. [ cheers and applause ] >> so, friends, keep the faith. don't get rattled by all of this. we're going to plow right through it and do our job. >> we have two guests with us
tonight to talk about all of it. annie karni, white house reporter for politico, and ron klain, who was key counsel to the judiciary committee and who led the committee through the nomination to the supreme court. ron, that's all the time we have, thank you so much for coming. >> thank you so much, brian. >> annie, i would like to begin with you on the journalistic side, that is the state of play tonight. "chilled" is the exact right word for mcconnell's comment. their best bet for them is that dr. ford does not tell her story, decides it's not worth it for her.
and comments like mitch mcconnell's are designed to make her think that it doesn't matter if i come forward, this is going to be plowed through. this is terribly costly to me and what's the point, really. it has a chilling effect, and president trump finally after a few days of restraint on this issue, of really saying we're going to give her the time, following his counselor kellyanne conway's lead on saying we're going to let this woman tell her story, we need to hear her story, his tweets this morning were more in line with what the general public has come to expect to be his original take judging how he's dealt with other people he's supported who have come under fire, roy moore, other people, that he usually does not believe the woman. this is the first time he cast doubt on her story. it all creates an atmosphere which makes her perhaps more scared to testify which is what the republicans are hoping for. one more political angle here is
that grassley now has to decide does he give her an extension of a day like she's requesting or does he call for the hearings on monday. we'll have to see. if he does call for the hearings, is there another avenue she takes, a tv interview, i don't know. that's something he has to factor in too. >> leave us with that question at the end of her comments. that's why we have annie karni on tonight. all right, ron. as apolitically as you can, are these deadlines, in fact, absolutely arbitrary? what would normal look like if such a thing existed, and what do we make of the quote from the majority leader that this thing is done and dusted? >> we're in the 11th hour, and it's one hour more than senator grassley's deadline, and it's a complete arbitrary deadline. a reporter pointed out over the past few months there have been hearings involving high tech executives testifying before congress and congress delays those hearings for weeks
at a time to accommodate the schedules of those executives and senator grassley isn't willing to wait for a day for dr. ford to testify. so that is arbitrary. it is very hard to defend. if they go forward with this vote on monday that grassley has threatened, history is going to judge very harshly the judiciary committee. 27 years ago, as chief counsel of the judiciary committee during the thomas/hill hearings, i really thought nothing could ever make the judiciary committee look worse than those proceedings. but what the judiciary committee is doing right now saying they're going to vote on a supreme court nominee without hearing from his accuser is actually ghastly compared to that. >> annie, you did get your attention with the fact that there are avenues open to dr. ford that don't involve sitting at a polished wood table in that committee room. the optics are all over the place. this is so fraught depending on who kind of has the leverage at any given time and who the committee hires as the outside questioning counsel for
starters. >> right, and that's what she's resisting. she wants to be questioned by the senators themselves. also the optics of how she staffs up is really interesting. i was told by democratic operatives there's been a desire to keep her away from progressive activists. she didn't come through politics. they told me they're not -- saddling her with more strategies to make it more political and turn people against her. she did make one hire of ricky kleinman, a longtime democratic operative. i'm sure ron klain probably knows her from working together. she worked for biden and clinton and ted kennedy. she was the first investigator that anita hill told her story to. she is advising dr. ford right now. i don't know that they're anywhere near her wanting to go public with a tv interview. i'm just saying she has some
maneuvering up her sleeve to that the republicans need to think about. >> there are a couple republicans who make the hearts soar however briefly of moderates and liberals. their names at least on my list germane to this conversation, collins, murkowski and flake. and you're hearing people ask, because their quotes have been all over the map, which collins, which murkowski, and which flake do you think will show up at the end of the day? >> as you say, brian, the hearts flutter in the hopes they will do the right thing, but most often they don't. and so we're going to have to see in this case. senator murkowski is the one most likely to opposite the kavanaugh nomination both because she's pro-choice, and because native american groups, which are important to her in alaska, have come out against kavanaugh because of his position on programs that benefit native americans. that kind of leaves collins and flake as key votes for mitch mcconnell. he said today they were going to plow through, and so maybe he has their votes in his pocket,
maybe not. but that is really what it comes down to is what does senator collins and flake do. >> ron klain, and indeed i saw that tweet from the "new york times" journalist tonight saying the senators have been far more accommodating to google and facebook than they have to dr. ford in this instance. our thanks to ron and annie terrific conversation. thank you both for coming on. coming up for us, president trump says there's a lingering stench at the justice department. we'll talk all about it when we come back. so you just walk around telling people geico
could help them save money on car insurance? yea,that and homeowners, renters, motorcycle and boat insurance. huh.that's nice. what happens when you catch a fish? gecko: whoa. geico. more than just car insurance. see how much you could save at geico.com. i'm ok! that's confident. but it's not kayak confident. kayak searches hundreds of travel and airline sites to find the best flights for us. so i'm more than confident. kayak. search one and done.
starts with great sleep. and the sleep number 360 smart bed is my competitive edge. it intelligently senses our movements and automatically adjusts our firmness and support on each side to keep us both incredibly comfortable. it can even warm our feet to help us fall asleep faster. it's great sleep i can feel and see. better sleep keeps me at the top of my game. for this team... and the home team. the new sleep number 360 smart bed, from $999. it's proven quality sleep. you wouldn't accept from any one else. why accept it from an allergy pill? flonase relieves sneezing, itchy, watery eyes and a runny nose, plus nasal congestion, which most pills don't. it's more complete allergy relief. flonase.
a bit of breaking news on the committee front. as they say, this just handed to me. chuck grassley, chairman of the committee has responded on twitter. he writes at 11:27 eastern time tonight, five times now we have granted extension for dr. ford to decide if she wants to proceed with her desire, stated one week ago that she wants to tell senate her story. dr. ford, if you changed your mind, say so, so we can move on. i want to hear your testimony. come to us or we to you. the chairman of the judiciary committee, chuck grassley.
that's the state of play as of ten minutes ago. this controversy over this kavanaugh nomination is not the only storm this administration is dealing with tonight. earlier you heard the president describing the lingering stench at the fbi. you don't hear that often from a president. he told his cheering crowd in springfield, missouri, tonight he would be getting rid of that stench. the drumbeat grows against the assistant deputy attorney general, rod rosenstein. it's been getting louder even before the president spoke. so far republicans on the hill have remained curiously silent, a lot of them, but a lot of commentators from the president's network of choice have been making it clear where they stand, along with trump family mechanics. as of this hour rosenstein appears to still have his job. for more on the state of play tonight, we are joined by two returning veterans, josh
gerstein from politico and jonathan allen, veteran journalist and author and nbc news national political reporter. so josh, if we can take out the subset of trump allies on or affiliated with fox news, what are you seeing and hearing from trump allies about what we've watched transpire post this "new york times" story? >> i think part of the sort of internal feedback loop that you're hearing come through the comments you played earlier from sean hannity is a suspicion that what is going on here is you have to remember who was in the room at the time of these conversations last may with rod rosenstein. at that time i think there was less tension among the members. but you're basically talking about justice department camps of trump appointees and career people from the fbi. in the time since those meetings have happened, those two camps have basically
gone to war with one another. in fact, rosenstein ordered the firing of andy mccabe, and mccabe is also now under criminal investigation for possibly charges relating to statements that he made to investigators about various events at the fbi. so there is some thinking in the trump camp and in the justice department camp that this is some kind of a plot to try to provoke some sort of chaos that perhaps if an inferno ensues, some people might be able to escape under those circumstances. that's what i think may be fueling the kinds of comments that you heard from sean hannity tonight. i think perhaps a more organic reaction from the trump folks is that they would be delighted to see rod rosenstein leave because somehow that would bring an end to the mueller investigation. >> jonathan, serious question. the president's choice of weekend venues, bedminster, new jersey, does it presume or predict any type of behavior?
>> not necessarily. i would say it's a place where he's very comfortable, where he often brings close allies and advisers in to talk to him, a place where he's made a lot of decisions before. but he's planning to be in bedminster long before this story broke today. i think his state of mind matters. the degree to which he's watching cable television at any given moment matters, and the messages he'll get from folks like sean hannity who say this is a trap, don't fire rod rosenstein, i think will also matter. >> and josh, the scenario under which -- by the end of this weekend, this blows back more on jeff sessions. >> yeah, it's totally possible, brian, that we could see that. he's always, i think, been in more jeopardy than rosenstein. we've seen the president's public frustration come out with sessions again and again.
he's now at the point of openly mocking the man's speaking habits, his accent and mannerisms, which is a pretty extraordinary thing, going well beyond simply saying you don't like the conduct of a cabinet official or you may have made a mistake in hiring him, we're down to protracted personal humiliation. the thing i do find fascinating is also just how many times rod rosenstein seems to have gotten crossways with the white house and escaped from that situation, it almost is sort of a movie-like situation where he's been dangled over and over again over the piranha tank by a thin thread and we turn away for a moment and somehow he's wriggled out of it. so i think to count rosenstein out here would be a mistake. he's a real veteran bureaucratic operator, two decades or more in the justice department. and he's used to moving around the bureaucracy. in each time he seems to have somehow miraculously diffused the situation.
>> jonathan, just one last word on the state of play in kavanaugh. the latest piece of news as we just read, the chairman has responded. the chairman, we should warn people who read the actual tweet, is a big fan of abbreviations, not so much punctuation. the president on twitter this morning kind of launched this #whyididntreport hashtag movement that people have been adding to, and adding to by the hundreds of thousands today. so the fever pitch couldn't be greater heading into the weekend. >> i think as long as dr. ford wants to testify, it's an untenable position for senate republicans to try to deny her the ability to do that or to force her to be there on one day versus another day in the same week. i think the more you hear the president talk about this, the more you hear senator mcconnell talk about this, the more you understand that a lot of
republicans who are looking at this are saying regardless of whether or not this is true, he should be confirmed. the problem for them is that may not necessarily be true for senator susan collins, senator lisa murkowski, senator jeff flake, and maybe others, senator capito of west virginia has been getting pressure from fellow alumni to consider this. there are a lot of senators who've been pretty quiet and i don't foresee a situation where dr. ford wants to testify and is not able to do that or has that possibility closed off to her. >> and as we come to the end of this segment, i'm told the chairman has just tweeted again. we're now going to read the second tweet in just a few minutes from chuck grassley. judge kavanaugh, i just granted
another extension to dr. ford. well, there's your news, to decide if she wants to proceed with the statement she made last week to testify to the senate. she should decide so we can move on. i want to hear her. i hope you understand. it's not my normal approach to be indecisive. so there you have it. apparently this one-day requested extension has been granted. this is the only news we have to go on, abbreviations and all. our thanks to josh gerstein and jonathan allen. another break for us. we'll be right back after this.
i love eggs, and there's a big difference between ordinary... and the best. which egg tastes more farm-fresh and delicious? only eggland's best. which egg has 6 times more vitamin d, 10 times more vitamin e, and 25% less saturated fat? only eggland's best. which egg is so special, i'd never serve my family anything else? for me, it's only eggland's best. better taste, better nutrition, better eggs. gathered here are the world's finest insurance experts. rodney -- mastermind of discounts like safe driver, paperless. the list goes on. how about a discount for long lists? gold. mara, you save our customers hundreds for switching almost effortlessly. it's a gift. and jamie. -present. -together we are unstoppable. so, what are we gonna do? ♪
♪ ♪ no matter when you retire, your income doesn't have to. see how lincoln can help ensure you still have income every month of your retirement, guaranteed, at lincolnfinancial.com. with us tonight to talk about everything we have witnessed today and discussed on this broadcast this evening, our friend, pulitzer prize winning journalist and author jon meacham.
his latest book, the soul of america, the battle for our better angels. john, we are friends and because we're friends we can engage in good-natured ribbing. okay, mr. morning in america, mr. better angels, tell us how we're better off after just what we've covered today and tonight and assure people there's a light at the end of this tunnel. >> we're at least getting closer to the end of the tunnel. there are three tributaries when you think about it. there's the senate, supreme court tributary, where the republican party has to decide whether it values the rule of law and fairness over the most raw kind of grab for power in the form of a supreme court seat. and we're amazingly watching this unfold on twitter tonight where the chairman of the senate judiciary committee is talking to a supreme court nominee on social media, which is not exactly what james madison had in mind, but there we are. so we have that tributary. we have the tributary of the deputy attorney general according to "the new york times" talking about the 25th amendment, which is not as you know the first time we've heard this conversation.
though it seems like three years ago, it was about a week ago we had an anonymous op-ed in "the new york times" talking about it. and really, the 25th amendment is code for the stability of the it. and really, the 25th amendment is code for the stability of the president of the united states himself. the third tributary is what we don't know and that's whatever bob mueller is doing. that continues to be a remarkably an important part of this presidency. the reason i remain essentially optimistic is the constitution was designed for moments like this. it was designed for moments where a demagogue may be in power or passion may trump reasons and one branch may try to run off with another branch and we have and it is pretty clear this is what's driving a lot of the republicans in the senate right now. we have the prospect of all the rest of us being able to weigh in on this and about two months time.
less than that at the ballot box. this is a stress test but we are all in this together. >> should this federal judge become justice kavanaugh, not for the first time with someone get to the high court with a problem in how they got there? >> no. i suspect and this is not a partisan point. if brett kavanaugh becomes justice kavanaugh between now and the first week of november. you will see more democratic lawmakers joining congress in january. >> all right, well put john meacham, i take back everything i said about you. thank you very much summing up another week as we prove playing out right at the midnight hour here in the middle east. jon meacham with us tonight. coming up, a new political
ad, as this president is fond of saying, the likes of which we've never seen before when "the 11th hour" continues. i'll take you there. take this left. if you listen real hard you can hear the whales. oop. you hear that? (vo) our subaru outback lets us see the world. sometimes in ways we never imagined. so let's promote our falle a homecomingtravel dealame, on choicehotels.com like this. touchdown. earn a free night when you stay just twice this fall. or, badda book. badda boom.
book now at choicehotels.com is my competitive edge. it senses our movements and automatically adjusts to keep us both effortlessly comfortable. so i'm at my best for this team... and the home team. sleep number proven quality sleep, from $999. this is the angel oak. some say the oldest living thing east of the mississippi. it's weathered countless storms. battered, but never broken, it stands for the resilience within us all. ♪
things got a little heated in dallas, texas tonight. ted cruz, and beto o'rourke met in their first debate, the race to represent 28 millions in the u.s. senate. it's attracted national attention because it's close. and it's because it's a red state. ted cruz was forced to insist it has not caused him his dignity to support donald trump after all the insults of the campaign including to cruz's wife and father. >> after the election in 2016, i faced the choice. donald trump had been elected president and we had an opportunity, an opportunity to do something extraordinary. i made a conscious choice to do the job i have been elected to do.
i got a responsibility to fight for every person here and every person in this state. i have worked hand in hand with the president on substance and we have delivered remarkable victories. >> the average citizens from both parties and independence alike. wonder where our junior senator is. when you have a president who may or may not have tried to clue with russia in 2016 and helsinki as he defended vladimir putin. instaed stead of the united states of america, that was collusion in action. >> senator cruz has led in most polls. the race is closer than expected. earlier today, the cook political report shifted their rating for this race from the lean republican category, officially to a tossup, and that's significant. a quinnipiac poll from this week shows senator cruz up 9 points.
but an online poll shows o'rourke up by two on cruz. for the dems, o'rourke has been on a fund-raising bonanza. $9 million just over the web and just over the month of ago according to the latest reporting on politico. all of which brings us to the last thing before we go tonight. it has to do with our politico divisions. while they are not new to the trump era, and while it's worth remembering there were households in this country where lincoln's name dare not be mentioned, same with fdr and clinton and obama and plenty of others. we haven't quite seen a president's ability to split families and friendships quite like this. case in point, is a campaign ad that went up today. it's an attack ad no doubt, it's designed to take down incumbent republican congressman paul gosar of arizona running for his
fifth term. he's a dentist by trade, and politically he is a thorough trumper, he theorized, charlottesville was the work of the left and maybe even by george soros, he's pro life, anti-dreamer, he's called comey and rosenstein treasonous, the ad is for his democratic opponent mike brill. what makes it unusual among attack ads, is gosar is being attacked by his six siblings. >> none of this is pleasant for any of us. >> it's horrible to have to do this. >> to speak up against my brother, it brings sadness to me. >> this isn't just about paul, this is about our family. >> i think my brother has traded a lot of the values we had at our kitchen table -- >> i couldn't be quiet any longer. nor should any of us be. >> we got to stand up for our
good name. this is not who we are many. >> it's intervention time, and intervention time means that you go to vote and you go to vote paul out. my name is tim gosar. >> jennifer gosar. >> grace gosar. >> paul gosar is my brother. >> and i endorse dr. brill. >> and i wholeheartedly endorse dr. david brill for congress. >> i'm dr. david brill and i approve this message. >> you don't see that kind of thing too often. probably not a terrible idea to reach out to your siblings over the weekend, especially those of you running for congress. we reached the end of another action packed week in the news business. and in sports, congratulations to cleveland browns fans everywhere. that is our broadcast on a friday night. and for this week, have a good weekend and good night from nbc news headquarters here in new york.