Skip to main content

tv   All In With Chris Hayes  MSNBC  December 7, 2018 5:00pm-6:00pm PST

5:00 pm
was a politics where we knew we could be nasty to each other but at the end of the day we're collectively into it and then no longer. >> no longer. well, for a while anyway. thanks to my panel. that's "hardball" for tonight. lots more on this story coming up tonight. it's a news bombshell, the president directing criminal activity. that's starting right now. good evening from new york, i'm in for chris hayes on an incredible night of news, three new court filings tonight. two of them sentencing recommendations concerning former trump fixer michael cohen, one from the office of the special counsel robert mueller, the other from the united states attorney for the southern district of new york. co-hen is set to be sentenced next wednesday and the sdny is recommending he be put behind bars for years. but the fate of michael co-hen is not the biggest news tonight, for starters the memo from the
5:01 pm
southern district of new york includes this passage concerning coen's illegal hush money payments to two women who had affairs with trump. as cohen has now admitted with respect to both payments he acted in coordination and at the direction of individual one. as a result of cohen's actions neither woman spoke to the press. prior to the election. okay, let's be clear. individual one is donald trump. federal prosecutors, not robert mueller's team, the sdny, are saying that donald trump committed a serious felony, that he was intimately involved in the illegal scheme to pay the hush money. actually, he was more than intimately involved, no pun intended, trump directed the hush money scheme. think about that. faced with this reality, trump decided to create his own, the president tweeted. totally clears the president, thank you. no. that's not just a lie. that's the actual opposite of
5:02 pm
the truth. federal prosecutors are saying in black and white that donald trump broke the law, that he directed his fixer to make an illegal payment, which is a felony. and that's not even close to how much we have to cover tonight, including this passage from the mueller filing, "cohen provided relevant and useful information concerning his contacts with persons connected to the white house during the period of 2017 to 2018." wait a minute. 2017 to 2018? that's not during the campaign. that's once trump was president. so you've got mueller for the first time revealing that cohen was coordinating with the white house while he was preparing his congressional testimony in which he perjured himself. so that's huge. and i haven't even gotten to the russia stuff yet. start with this, from the mueller filing "in or around november 2015 cohen received the contact information for and spoke with a russian national
5:03 pm
who claimed to be a trusted person in the russian federation who could offer the campaign political synergy and synergy on a government level." "the defendant recalled this person repeatedly proposed a meeting between individual one -- that's trump -- and the president of russia." the person told cohen such a meeting could have a phenomenal impact, not only political but business dimension as well. referring to the moscow project. there is no bigger warranty than any project than the consent of the president of russia. cohen didn't follow up, but there you have the trump campaign interacting with a russian national claiming to have influences in putin's circle who wanted trump to meet with vladimir putin and who was promising to get the russian government to clear the way for trump tower moscow in exchange for political and business considerations. synergy. there's also a footnote in which cohen admits he lied when he said he had never talked to
5:04 pm
trump about trying to set up a meeting with putin. "the defendant admitted this account was false and that he had in fact conferred with individual one about contacting the russian government before reaching out to gauge russia's interest in such a meeting." but i'm not done yet. there's one more thing. mueller also released a heavily redacted document involving paul manafort, the former trump campaign chair. as you recall, unlike cohen, manafort formally agreed to cooperate with the government, but mueller pulled out of that agreement and said manafort had been lying to prosecutors while feeding information to the trump legal team. that document says manafort told multiple discernible lies about five major issues after agreeing to cooperate. including "his contacts with administration officials." now, just to keep us all orderly, i'm going to get to the manafort stuff in a bit. but let's begin tonight with what we learned in the michael
5:05 pm
cohen filings, two different ones. here to help us go through the incredible details, including what we learned about trump and the russians, i'm joined by the guy i always turn to for this stuff, nbc news investigative reporter tom winter, and justice analyst matt miller, a former chief spokesperson for the department of justice. gentlemen, thank you for being with me on a friday night. tom winter, let's talk about this. you followed this very closely. you and i have been together when everything to do with russia and cohen has come out. what did we learn tonight that we didn't know? >> so, specifically to the russia aspect of this, ali, i think one of the key things we learned tonight was that there were contacts that occurred in november of 2015 involving michael cohen, involving russian national so this appears to be an individual that we haven't heard about before which is a bit of an interesting part of this investigation. the other thing is, this isn't that there were discussions that were occurring that we've heard about in 2016, this appears to me to back up the time frame
5:06 pm
quite a bit here, ali, to november of 2015. so that means that by the time the president says in a press conference in july of 2016 russia, are you listening? with respect to getting somebody's e-mails. they're already eight or nine months in here of knowing that russia wants some sort of communication, they want some sort of "political synergy." i think it's important that that phrase, political synergy that you talked about,al li, is referenced here in quotes. meaning there's some sort of a documentation or some sort of specific quote or testimony or something that occurred here that allows them to make that statement in this court filing. so i think it's significant from that standpoint. i think it's also significant that passage that you read just a few moments ago, there's a paragraph that follows it which i'll read, it's very short. it's the second -- cohen provided the special counsel's office with useful information concerning certain discreet russia related matters, core to its investigation that he
5:07 pm
obtained by visitrtue of his regular contact with company executives during the campaign, company believed to be the trump organization. so you have here the special counsel saying, hey, it wasn't just the trump tower -- excuse me, the trump tower moscow project here, this was -- these were other matters tied to russia that are part of the special counsel's investigation that he provided insight to just through his day-to-day communications with people in the trump organization. i think those are two very specific russia kind of russia matters, if you will, or russia specific parts of this. and, you know, all along there's been some criticism of this investigation that's being led by the special counsel's office saying, well, hey, they're indicting people or getting people to plead guilty to things that don't mention russia in them. and now we continue to get closer and closer to this idea of russian contacts as it relates to individuals that are
5:08 pm
very much in the trump orbit as michael cohen was. >> so, matt, and i'm going to deal with the hush money and michael cohen and the implications that the president might have been involved in that felony a little bit later. let's stick with russia for a second. it's back in the spotlight. i think we've learned, as tom says, three things we didn't know all that well. the contacts with russia started earlier than we thought in 2015. that there was stuff going on between michael cohen and the white house in 2017 and into this year, 2018. and that cohen was in touch with the white house while he was preparing for his testimony in which he perjured himself. so the idea that donald trump wanted to put out there that michael cohen was insignificant to him, his operation and the contact with the russians seemed to have disappeared with this filing. >> yeah, i think you can complete lysette th complete ly set that aside. this filing says my col cohen
5:09 pm
when he was having these contacts with the russian government, he had done that with the full knowledge of the then candidate, now president of the united states, donald trump. i think the thing -- the piece -- the new information in the timeline is so significant. if you look at all of the contacts we know they started contacts with the russian government where they asked for synergy at a government level, started in 2015, they, of course, continued with this june 2016 trump tower meeting. the same time in august or just after that in august paul manafort was meeting with kalemnik who is a russian intelligence agent and they continued through the transition when sergey kislyak was meeting with mike flynn. and the president's son-in-law jared kushner, said, you know, the special counsel, you're looking at a long timeline of outreach from russian government officials, russian intermediaries, russian intelligence assets to the trump campaign. and we don't know the full
5:10 pm
substance of that skrooutreach. we do know bob mueller knows a significant amount about it. so the 2015 outreach, one of the things i thought was significant, the filing notes that michael cohen ultimately decided not to sort of return the call or get back in touch with that person, but it doesn't say anything about did he do anything else with that information? did he pass it on to anyone else in the organization? did me make anyone else aware of it? was donald trump aware of it? we don't know. maybe the special counsel is silent on that fact. it's relevant to the investigation and we wants to keep it quiet. >> we have hardly scratched the surface. we appreciate you both being here. stick around, matt, and i'm going to talk with you about the manafort filing. i need to stick with cohen for a while here, though, to talk about the legal ramifications of tonight's russia revelations. i'm joined by kim way lee, elliott we elliott williams, deputy attorney general in the united states under president obama,
5:11 pm
and msnbc legal analyst and former assistant special prosecutor -- special watergate prosecutor, in fact, nick akerman. let me start with you, nick. you and i have been talking about this for a long time. i went in close to the ground on this one in my conversation with those two guys. now let's pull this back, take it in its entirety and tell me where you think we are. >> we've got a very powerful legal juggernaut that mueller has put together that is going straight at donald trump. it's not just that cohen is providing information about russia and the conspiracy between the campaign and russia, but you've also got flynn, michael flynn, the former national security adviser who is also providing information and according to mueller has been cooperating fully. which means that he's been providing information about the sanctions and the lifting of sanctions, which was the quid pro quo for the russian help during the campaign. and, again, if you look at the facts surrounding that, donald
5:12 pm
trump is right in the middle of that. he's in mar-a-lago, and flynn is calling him to talk about having this conversation with the russian ambassador. he calls back after he has the russian ambassador. there's no question that donald trump had to know exactly what went on in that conversation. >> yeah. >> and then flynn lied about it. what happened was, by pure coincidence, president obama put a monkey wrench in the system by imposing more sanctions because of the russian interference. then you've got to take into account rick gates who also knows a lot of what went on with the russians. and so when you put all of that together, you're coming up with a pretty powerful case and you're going to also find out that it's not all over with paul manafort. he is going to get a pretty significant sentence as a result of his lies. but that doesn't mean that he can't cooperate after that. >> right. >> because under the rules, he still has a year to go before a
5:13 pm
federal district court judge and get his sentence reduced if he cooperates. >> right, although i don't know what a sentence for paul manafort means. kim wehle, talk legal stuff for a second. three filings tonight, one is the united states district of columbia, about manafort, put that aside for now. and then two filings, the thinner of the two is from mueller's team, this is the special counsel's report about michael cohen and his sentencing. this big thick one, this one's seven pages, this is 38 pages and this is from the united states attorney for the southern district of new york. so this is not the -- however many angry democrats donald trump talks about and ending the mueller investigation, this is united states attorney's office. what's the distinction? why should we care about this? by the way, the u.s. attorney's report is much harsher than the special counsel's. >> it reads like good cop, bad cop. the southern district of new york is giving its reasons for why they're not recommending a
5:14 pm
5k1 letter for mr. cohen, saying it's not a good guy, he's done bad things and they walk through it with great care. i think the key one is the campaign finance violation that i know you want to talk about later. and then -- but they say, listen, we're not so to speak throwing the book at him because he is actually cooperating with robert mueller and then robert mueller weighs in and says yes, there is our two cents on it and our seven pages, but that's -- that's a blockbuster of a document in and of itself. that is -- it's more telling in the broader picture than the longer 28-page one from the southern district of new york. >> and the southern district of new york is saying the normal range for the crimes of my col cohen is 51 to 63 months. what they are asking for is that the court impose a substantial term of imprisonment, one that reflects applicable guideline range. elliott, they're still recommending a good long prison term for michael cohen, as kim
5:15 pm
just said, he's not considered a cooperating witness. what do you think this has done? >> well, it's all about the pattern of dishonesty he's exhibited with these crimes. you're talking about crimes on our campaign system, he was lying to banks and it was a series of crimes of dishonesty. they make notes of that. they actually talk substantially about privilege. like and white collar criminals feeling like they will be reputationly harmed and he will be punished to the extent as anybody else because we can't deter people from future crimes if people like you are punished. it's fascinating toward the end of this. this is about getting at this pattern of dishonesty that you saw from him in the crimes he committed before. and, you know, ultimately lying to federal investigators later on. this dishonesty that pervades all aspects of this investigation. lying was a common theme. you held up the three documents,
5:16 pm
both manafort's documents and both cohen's documents, it's all about honesty and it does not pay to lie to the federal government. and michael cohen is going to see that. they tweaked him a bit by saying he was asking for a sentence that was 99.5% lower than the federal guidelines would have contemplated because he was asking for just the couple days of time served. and it's just -- they're just night and day in different places with respect to what he's done. these are considered very, very serious crimes. you're talking about lying under oath, or to federal investigators. that's what this is about. >> kim, the president cease it differently than you do. he tweeted out not too long ago, i want to put that back on the screen because it's kind of about the most remarkable tweet i've seen all week. it says totally clears the president. thank you. okay. just file that thought for a second. in the southern district of new york sentencing report it says as cohen himself has now admitted with respect to both payments, he acted in coordination with and at the
5:17 pm
direction of individual one. we know individual one to be the president of the united states now, then donald trump candidate. tell me about how these two things connect, the president's saying totally clears the president and sdny saying the president was involved in a felony with -- or at least implying the president was involved in a felony with michael cohen. >> the connection is a bit of a mind bender. to say it totally clears the president blanks reality. he's at a point of his pr campaign, saying it's a witch hunt, none of it means anything, going by the wayside. this sentencing is beyond -- it's a lot about lying but it also -- when i was reading it, it struck me how it's drafted in a way it's almost a message to the american public. you could actually put trump in the position of mr. cohen here, starting at page 23, talks about why do we care about campaign finance? >> yes, this is important. >> it's really important. while many americans who desired
5:18 pm
a particular outcome in the election knocked on doors, toiled at phone banks or found any number of other legal ways to make their voices heard, cohen sought to influence the election from the shadows. a lot of people are overwhelmed with all this information. why should we care? we should care because we do want free and fair elections in our democratic process. this document is speaking potentially on what should come or what could come, either the criminal justice system or through impeachment process, why we should care. >> i'm glad you brought that up, kim. because in this very long document that part can be understood by a guy like me who's not a lawyer. where you finished off, it went on to say it is this type of harm that congress sought to prevent when it imposed limits on candidates. very direct line to the offense to dmiks -- democracy, not just under the law that michael cohen in his words, of individual one, donald trump. kim wehle thank you, elliott
5:19 pm
williams, thank you. one of the key takeaways from the sentencing memo filed -- does read like a menu, actually. filed by michael cohen is the conclusion by federal prosecutors, not by mueller's team, but by the southern district of new york that the now president of the united states, donald trump, directed michael cohen to make illegal campaign payments. >> this filing that you just started to highlight, that was made today in the michael cohen case really does, for the first time, you have federal prosecutors essentially saying that donald trump committed a felony. >> i'm joined now by former congresswoman liz holtsman, author of the case for impeaching trump. she was in the watergate hearings, voted for impeachment and helped draft the guidelines for what was then a special prosecutor. former deputy assistant attorney
5:20 pm
general harry litman, also joins us, and nick akerman is staying with us. nick was a former watergate prosecutor and is an msnbc legal analyst. thanks to all three of you, liz, let's start with you. you have written a book called "the case for impeachment," i believe it's called. this is as close as it's gotten. it's not new information in that we knew from michael cohen's earlier testimony and the information against him that he said he was directed by individual one, but now the sdny seems to be saying they believe that to be the case. >> right. i mean, i think you see something very serious. the real question that comes out is what is the implication of the prosecution, the conviction of michael cohen for president trump? >> right, that's the question. >> during watergate the grand jury secretly indicted richard nixon -- i'm sorry, secretly richard nixon as a coconspoor
5:21 pm
for. was that done here? we don't know. that didn't come out right away. >> you didn't see that, did you? there's no reference to anything that's been done with donald trump as a result of this. >> no, not at all. being an unindicted co-conspirator is an evidentiary fact so you can get statements in in furtherance of a conspiracy. you're not going to really see that until you see other people indicted and there's a trial. and the prosecution decides they're not going to indict donald trump. >> and both of you were there in watergate so you remember how this unfolded. there was one key difference, and you, as a lawyer and a former member of congress, know what that was, and that was that legislators at some point decided enough was enough, they decided that richard nixon was an albatross, that it was going to cost them. buzz anything that happened tonight, do these documents influence american legislatiors in any way? >> american legislators in congress were very much
5:22 pm
influenced by the american people. that's what started the impeachment process, when the american peel said we're not a banana republic, congress, you have to do the right thing, and they really forced congress into action. that could happen here. i mean, i think the fact that we have all of these different tentacles surrounding the president of the united states, it's closing in on him. we now have his fixer, his lawyer, personal lawyer -- >> his campaign chair, his national security adviser. >> right. now being said -- the prosecutors are saying directed and coordinated with the president, now the president of the united states. we have manafort who's been convicted of lying, former campaign manager, national security adviser, now we have other russians who apparently were contacting the campaign. and i believe, as i read the documents, that michael cohen
5:23 pm
discussed that november approach by the russians with donald trump. or maybe it was the u.n. but trump has been advised about these -- from the russians. we know he's part of this. >> that's the thing. harry litman, that's the thing that comes out as you parse these pages. if you thought that michael cohen was a shady businessman, you're pretty clear on that from these documents. if you thought that paul manafort was a shady businessman, your clear on that from these documents. the important thing, the degree to which donald trump is referred to as having known of, been involved in and having directed things, despite the fact that he is constantly denying all of these things since before he was president and well through his presidency. >> that's it, exactly. and remember, ali, what we have here is a seven-page document with sort of bland and elliptical statements from -- right, but they stand in. and also, sdny, you know, in
5:24 pm
terms of the three crimes that you set out. but what underlies them is seven -- is dozens of hours of detailed conversation from cohen, so we now know he was sitting there giving chapter and verse not just about his own involvement, not just some of his own financial high jinx, the very crimes that clearly the president was involved in. the stormy -- the campaign finance crimes. and now we know the russian -- what they call the moscow project, the trump tower overture that connects both political and commercial misdeeds. we know all these -- all the statements in the filing are magnified to a degree we just don't know yet, but has to be substantial by everything that
5:25 pm
cohen actually said. >> so nick, let me just ask you here, there are people saying, well, how does this all affect trump, and what does it all mean? what does the narrative start to look like? and it looks like there was some contact with russians, there was some desire to do business in russia, there was some quid pro quo possibly offered to vladimir putin in the reports of a top floor apartment at trump tower, e-mails leaked, there may have been a couple conspiracy theorists talking to wick qkile and the adoptions were discussed, sanctions against russia, the mangnitsky act. >> the narrative comes out of the russian indictment in july of this past year, the conspiracy to break into the democratic national committee, steal the documents, steal the e-mails, and then releasing and staging the release of those documents right through the campaign. you can take everything that's
5:26 pm
in these documents and fit that right in. it's clear from the cohen papers, from the special counsel that there was a conspiracy and contact with the russians. it's clear also from the flynn plea and his cooperation that he's testifying to that. and so if you take it right from step one, right from the time when -- if you take it back to november, i mean, that's roger stone, supposedly got fired by trump and he goes under cover to work in a situation, of plausible deniability, to have nothing to do with the campaign. but yet he's the only person in america that speaks to the russian operative who releases the first of the stolen documents. and happens to also speak to julian assange, who is releasing the rest of the documents. but it all goes through to trump tower where don jr. gets the june 4th e-mails saying the russian government is supporting trump in the campaign, that they've got documents to bring to trump, first offering them to trump's secretary, but in the
5:27 pm
e-mail states better to bring it in person. we don't know if they actually brought the e-mails in person. probably not. but we do know that donald trump, on june 7th, after winning the new jersey primary with don jr. at his side said he's going to release the next week all this information about the clintons. and he doesn't. but yet, a week after that you've got guccifer 2.0, the russian operative releasing information and on and on. up to the point of the access hollywood tape where they're actually using those documents to deflect attention from donald trump and put it on hillary clinton. >> trump better hope you're not working with mueller on this one. i've got to wrap this up. thank you to all of of you. thanks for the time you've put in to helping us understand these complicated legal issues. much more to come on the lies, the obstruction, and what happens next. we'll break it all down. do not go anywhere.
5:28 pm
life isn't a straight line. things happen. and sometimes you can find yourself heading in a new direction. but at fidelity, we help you prepare for the unexpected with retirement planning and advice for what you need today and tomorrow. because when you're with fidelity, a partner who makes sure every step is clear, there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. a partner who makes sure every step is clear,
5:29 pm
and then, more jobs robegan to appear.. what started with one job spread all around. because each job in energy creates many more in this town. it's proven quality sleep. the new sleep number 360 smart bed, from $999... intelligently senses your movement and automatically adjusts on each side to keep you both effortlessly comfortable. it can even warm your feet to help you fall asleep faster. how smart is that? smarter sleep. to help you shed those sugar cookies, get a running start on the holidays, and take it all in with the patience of a saint. don't miss the last chance to save up to $500 on select sleep number 360 smart beds. ends monday. ♪ spread a little love today ♪ spread a little love my-y way ♪ ♪ spread a little something to remember ♪ philadelphia cream cheese. made with fresh milk and real cream makes your recipes their holiday favourites. the holidays are made with philly. their holiday favourites.
5:30 pm
...that's why i've got the power of 1-2-3 medicines with trelegy. the only fda-approved 3-in-1 copd treatment. ♪ trelegy. the power of 1-2-3 ♪ trelegy 1-2-3 trelegy with trelegy and the power of 1-2-3, i'm breathing better. trelegy works 3 ways to... airways,... ...keep them open... ...and reduce inflammation... ...for 24 hours of better breathing. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. trelegy is not for asthma. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. do not take trelegy more than prescribed. trelegy may increase your risk of thrush, pneumonia, and osteoporosis. call your doctor if worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling,.. ...problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain occur. think your copd medicine is doing enough? maybe you should think again. ask your doctor about once-daily trelegy and the power of 1-2-3. ♪ trelegy 1-2-3 save at
5:31 pm
5:32 pm
5:33 pm
5:34 pm
5:35 pm
5:36 pm
5:37 pm
5:38 pm
5:39 pm
5:40 pm
5:41 pm
5:42 pm
5:43 pm
and just like you, the further into winter we go, the heavier i get. and while your pants struggle to support the heavier you, your roof struggles to support the heavier me. crash! and your cut-rate insurance might not pay for this. so get allstate, you could save money and be better protected from mayhem like me. mayhem is everywhere. so get an allstate agent. are you in good hands? a new way to save on travel. now when you book a flight you unlock discounts on select hotels that you can add on to your trip up until the day you leave. add on advantage. only when you book with expedia.
5:44 pm
yeah, i've had some prettyeer. prestigious jobs over the years. news producer, executive transport manager, and a beverage distribution supervisor. now i'm a director at a security software firm. wow, you've been at it a long time. thing is, i like working. what if my retirement plan is i don't want to retire? then let's not create a retirement plan. let's create a plan for what's next. i like that. get a plan that's right for you. td ameritrade. ♪
5:45 pm
♪ applebee's bigger bolder grill combos are back. now that's eatin good in the neighborhood. unstopand it's strengthenedting place, the by xfi pods,gateway. which plug in to extend the wifi even farther, past anything that stands in its way. ...well almost anything.
5:46 pm
leave no room behind with xfi pods. simple. easy. awesome. click or visit a retail store today. the memos we've been talking about all night, from the special counsel, the united states attorney for the southern district of new york, these were dropped on the same day that the president announced his brand new pick for a permanent attorney general, william bar, you may know this guy's name, you may remember him, he was the former attorney general under president george herbert walker bush. he's trump's no, ma'minee to re jeff sessions. what is trump up to with the department of justice and all of this news breaking tonight, here's richard painter to talk about it. richard, welcome, thank you for being with us. the president has been carrying on with news all day today, or
5:47 pm
whatever he calls it. he's been tweeting some pretty crazy stuff. i want to just, before i back into the william barr conversation, the president put out a tweet not long ago in which he said in reference to these reports, these sentencing reports, totally clears the president, thank you. wouldn't mind getting your take on that. >> i just think the president's out of control on twitter. today he's attacking robert mueller, yet again. he's completely out of control. he thinks he's going to shut this investigation down. either through twitter or through appointing an attorney general who's going to shut it down. that's not going to happen. >> let's talk about this new attorney general who he's appointed. interesting because this was an attorney general under george herbert walker bush. he was confirmed by a democratically controlled senate in just a voice vote overwhelmingly. what's the president thinking with william barr? >> well, i don't know what he's thinking. he probably thinks he wants to kill off the mueller investigation.
5:48 pm
let's start william barr, people with different opinions of him. i happen to have a very high opinion of william barr. he was a very good attorney general and could be a good attorney general in any administration. but he must recuse from the russia investigation and all the other investigations of the trump campaign, including the investigation of the southern district of new york. let's look at the facts. just today we've learned the prosecutors in new york, they believed the president of the united states has committed felony campaign finance violations. robert mueller has already obtained kwiks of guilty pleas for the president's lawyer. we have the president's former campaign chairman, paul manafort, the vice chair of the campaign, mr. gates. we have the former national security adviser, michael flynn, a number of other guilty pleas, a bunch of them are cooperating with the prosecutors. president trump fired the
5:49 pm
director of the fbi, james comey, in order to stop this investigation. he's repeatedly tried to fire robert mueller. he fired jeff sessions because jeff sessions wouldn't shut down the investigation. there's just no way that william barr can come into this job and oversee the investigation. he has to recuse. he's been appointed by the president at this juncture. if he thinks he's going to shut it down or control it in any way, it's not going to happen. if william barr does not recuse, he's going to be spending almost all of his time sitting in front of the united states house of representatives judiciary committee explaining himself. >> let me ask you this. because when attorney general jeff sessions recused himself, rod rosenstein took over the russia part of the investigation, and appointed bob mueller, the president constantly talks about the 12 angry democrats and however many and mueller and all that kind of stuff. but i think there's an interesting distinction in these
5:50 pm
two reports, one filed by mueller's team and the much harder, tougher, bigger one filed by the u.s. attorney of the southern district of new york. who i suppose the president could fire also but that's a different thing. that's call a biased investigation. this is the united states attorney for the southern district of new york, and they are coming down harder on both cohen and the president than the mueller investigation did. >> well, for the moment, yes. but robert mueller has yet to release his report, has yet to file initial indictments, and robert mueller's investigation is very sensitive to the national security of our country, and that investigation is going to continue, and i think it is a serious threat to donald trump. that's why he's been trying to fire robert mueller. and referring to robert mueller and his team as a bunch of angry democrats is crazy. robert mueller is a republican. see a type of republican that i was for 30 years until the party was turned over to a bunch of people who want to collaborate with the russians. this is nuts.
5:51 pm
the president cannot bring in an attorney general who is going to try to control this investigation. we're fine with rod rosenstein supervising and robert mueller continuing his investigation, and the prosecutors need to continue in the southern district of new york and we need to get to the bottom of this. >> richard, good to talk to you as always. thank you for joining us. richard painter is with us tonight. he definitely always has some good views on this thing there seems to be enough evidence right now that not only suggests that the president acted in a way that is contrary to the interests of the country, but that he committed a crime, which gives one the impression that the incoming democratic house majority might be forced to think about impeachment proceedings, but before they really wanted to. to talk more about where things might be headed, i'm joined by elie mystal, executive editor for "above the law." a little earlier i had a conversation with texas congressman joaquin castro. i was actually surprised by his
5:52 pm
answer. he said at some point while no member of congress gets elected to impeach a president, it's complicated, it's not what they want to, do you can't keep denying this sort of information. and in this document it talks about the fact that the president may have conspired with michael cohen to commit a felony that influenced an election. michelle, what do democrats do about this? because so many of those democratic votes were about fixing the economy and fixing health care and things like that. do the democrats have a mandate or the backing of the american people to pursue impeachment? >> i think that absolutely a lot of those democratic votes you're right were about health care, were about sort of pocketbook issues, but they were also a rebuke to donald trump, right. the reason that you have such an unprecedented outpouring of volunteer, the reason that you had such an unprecedented increase in turnout was because people wanted to stand up to the lawlessness of this administration. so i don't think that they're going to go in there and start impeachment proceedings in january, but what they're going to do is start other sorts of
5:53 pm
investigations that simultaneously with mueller i think are going to keep revealing new evidence of criminality. and it may well become a place in which you kind of it's so overwhelming that it becomes absurd not to start impeachment proceedings, although at that point you might also see trump's political support begin to crack. >> this is interesting. >> that's an interesting point. >> right. it's unfair to put all of this on the democrats, right? at some point, and we let them off the hook all time, at some point republicans of conscience have to stand up. >> which they did in watergate. in watergate they said this is too much. >> right now today what we've seen, robert mueller is coming out here like the ghost of christmas future, right? and the republicans are still screaming fake dream, fake dream, like at some point they have to wrestle with what's happening to their country, to our country. and if they're not willing to go along, like i think it's at some point unfair to just put this
5:54 pm
all on democratic strength. >> i don't think we're going to see republicans acting out of an outbreak of conscienceness and patriotism. i think that what might happen is trump's approval rate also really crumble. >> but they don't move. >> they move a little bit. they move a little bit, right? they move from 42 to 38. >> right. >> i think if we enter' are session -- >> they don't get to 30. >> you're right. trump is already a much diminished figure, and i think as the evidence of his failures become harder and harder for his supporters to explain away, i mean, you saw that happen. it took longer. but you could very tangibly see it happen with george w. bush where there was this sort of macho hero worship and cult around him that eventually faded away as people had to reckon with the obvious failure of the iraq war. and so i think it might happen on a slightly more rapid timetable with this administration just because the failures are eventually i think going to be -- you're probably
5:55 pm
still going to have a third of people who are apologizing for this president. you had die-hard nixon supporters until the very end. but i think that you might see republican support go into the 70s or even the 60s. >> i don't know that that's a good enough answer. i don't know -- i don't know how many more susan collins press conferences i can take while she plays hamlet. i don't know how much more i can hear from marco rubio or lindsey graham or all these people who want to get on tv and act like they have principles. >> right. >> so at some point, when you're saying the approval ratings, what you're really talking about is at some point the american people have to start taking this stuff seriously and the left is already there. at some point the independents, the people on the right, the people who are watching basketball games right now instead of the news, at some point these people have to stand up and say we're not going to let the president of the united states commit crimes and do nothing. >> right. and is the weight of this kind of stuff and what comes out of the mueller investigation, is that what's going to do it,
5:56 pm
michelle? again, go back to watergate. it was when it became irrefutable. >> right. >> it was when republicans no longer had a leg to stand on to stand up for president. he is talking about fake dreams. it's when you can no longer say these are fake and these are angry democrats and these are made-up things. >> you know, i don't know what it's going to be. i feel like we have these moments every once in a while. >> a lot of people thought we crossed this line two years ago. >> right. and we should have. and in a remotely healthy functioning country, impeachment proceed position have started his first week in office. but what you see with this president is we kind of lull ourselves into this sort of meias ma where everybody sort of muddles oo s along, and the scr fall from people's eyes and there is this sort of panic as everybody reckons with what kind of monster he is. you see it after the helsinki conference. you see it at john mccain's funeral. and as the evidence of collusion or as it's called in one of these filings, one of the
5:57 pm
russians that they meet with, political synergy, which i feel is a pretty good synonym for collusion. i think eventually he's still out there tweeting no collusion. i think that eventually the evidence of collusion, mueller has left a lot of breadcrumbs that it's there under those black bars. and eventually i feel like it will become undeniable. whether republicans continue to deny it -- >> we hope that happens before i grow an afro. >> i think you got flip the kids. i think you got to go after the kids and i think you got break the kids. i think that one of the more interesting things in the sdny stuff, was withholding something, and we don't know exactly what that is. but since it's sdny, it probably involves new york which gets us into the trump organization itself. it would be interesting if what cohen was withholding was stuff on eric, stuff on don jr. i still think as much as roger stone looks like the next shoe
5:58 pm
to drop, i think eventually this needs to come to donald trump jr.'s desk and eric trump's desk, and we're going to have to see the president make a decision whether or not he is going to admit the truth to save his children or whether he is going to keep lying. >> i can't imagine he would ever do that. the more interesting question is whether his children would ever fold on him. >> let me ask you this, elie. one of the reasons why joaquin castro was saying we don't want to rush head long into impeachment, one of the reasons it hasn't been done since donald trump's first week in office sits really hard. the constitution designed it to be really, really hard. and if you thought the country had ground to a halt, that will grind it to a halt. >> and well i think the other reason that congressman castro weren't as forthcoming about is that you need 20 republicans to come with you to convict, right? democrats have the power to impeach in the house, but to convict him you have to take him thought the senate. and because we went further behind even in the senate, you're going to need 20 or so republicans to come on board,
5:59 pm
and i'm still waiting for ben sasse to grow a conscience. the math of it all makes it -- >> right. so what gets us to that watergate place where 20 republicans or however many republicans are able to say this is not right. >> like i said, the only thing that gets us to that place is when they feel like their reelection is in trouble, right? when the republican party and if not the base, enough kind of republicans drift away that they feel like it is in their own self-interest to break with this president. >> right. >> when he becomes a mill stone around their next. >> and that is not happening. that has not yet happened, despite everything this president has done, we haven't gotten ghosn to that point. >> nope. >> you see it coming any time soon? >> i think the democrats in the senate need to start thinking more creatively about corrective action and a kind of protest movement to start this. i want to see chuck schumer hold a hunger strike in the middle of the senate, right? let's see if that gets some people to understand how serious this is. >> thank you to both of you for being here on a bryde night.
6:00 pm
elie mystal, michelle goldberg. that is "all in" for this evening. "the rachel maddow show" starts right now. good evening. >> good evening. i'm much appreciated, my friend. thank you. thanks to you at home for joining us this hour. happy friday. happy to have you with us. this at least is not one of those fridays where it's a big news day as a surprise. this is a friday when we knew we were going to get a bunch of important information today on the ongoing russia investigation that has become the defining crisis of this presidency. we knew this was going to be a big day, and the news gods did not disappoint. so let's just jump right in. there are two major figures in the president's orbit whose legal worries got much worse today for themselves and whose relationship to the overall scandal involving the president somewhat changed today. one of them is the president's campaign chair, paul manafort. and one of them is the president's long-time personal lawyer who served for a decade as a senior executive at the president's real estate business. now heading into today,