tv The 11th Hour With Brian Williams MSNBC July 18, 2019 11:00pm-12:00am PDT
>> you're going on the second night of the next round of debates. >> that's right. >> we will be watching. presidential candidate julian castro, thank you very much for joining us. appreciate. >> it thanks, lawrence. >> that is tonight's last word. "the 11th hour" with brian williams starts now.it. >> thanks, lawrence. >> that is tonight's last word. "the 11th hour with brian williams" starts now. tonight the president denies what we saw say aghe was unhappy we that chant of send her back from the crowd at his rally last night, says he quickly tried to stop them by speaking up, which we will match against what actual happened last night. this evening, no longer just individual one. the president is named in court documents out today about numerous contacts with michael cohen and others surrounding the stormy daniels payoff. the government's former lead lawyer before the supreme court here with us for analysis tonight including why hope hicks may face jeopardy for her testimony. and kamala harris and joe biden set for a rematch in the
second debate as the stage is set for the next 20-candidate two-night extravaganza as "the 11th hour" gets under way on a thursday night. good evening from our headquarters in new york. day 910 of the trump administration. we are in the middle of an ugly period which got its start four days ago when the president targeted four american members of congress by saying why don't they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. last night on this broadcast, we watched clips of the president re litigalitigating his case in of his audience in north carolina. we heard him go after the congresswoman by name. we heard the crowd chant send her back about congress woman omar of minnesota. we watched while the president paused while the chant was rising up from the audience. today he tried to distance
himself from that chant and tried to deny what we watched last night. >> mr. president, if i may when your supporters last night were the chanting send her back, why didn't you stop them, why didn't you ask them to stop saying that. >> number one, i thinkdy. i started speaking very quickly. it really was a, i disagree with it, by the way. but it was quite a chant. and i felt a little bit badly about it. but i will say this, and i started speaking very quickly. but it started up rather fast as you probably know. >> congresswoman omar was welcomed back to her hometown of minneapolis with a very different chant tonight and she had herr own words for president trump. >> welcome home il han. come home il han. welcome home il han. welcome home il han. >> he is threatened because we
are inspiring people to dream about a country that recognizes their dignity and their humanity. when i said i was the president's nightmare, well, you're watching it now. because his nightmare is seeing a somali immigrant refugee rise to congress. >> the events of last night and trump's defiance over his attacks on these congress women have put trump's loyal republican party in a tough spot. his friend the south carolina republican senator lindsey graham publicly came to trump's defense even though once upon a time, graham had harsh words for trump on the matter of race. >> i want to talk to the trump supporters for a minute. here's what you're buying. he's a race-baiting xenophobic religious bigot. he doesn't represent my party. >> isn't it racist to say send her back? >> no, i don't think it's racist
to say. was it racist to say love it or leave it? i don't think a somali refugee would have been asked to go back. because they're black or muslim, that's not what this is about to me. what this is about to me is that these four congressman in their own way have been incredibly provocative. >> the house minority leader kevin mccarthy did tell reporters that the chants "have no place in our country." he went onto support trump's assertion about not taking part when the khans erupted. >> the president did not join in. president moved on. he moved on about a speech, about a country and the things that are building and right. that's what the president did. has it become so far that you want to dislike the president so much you're going to accuse him of trying to do something he did not do? >> behind the scenes, however, many republicans are not happy about what has unfolded. nbc news reporting some of trump's allies in congress suggested to vice president
pence today that the chants were not helpful and that such behavior should be discouraged. "new york times" reporting that house republican leaders "pleaded with pence on thursday morning to separate the party from the mess and embraced by the crowd." there's this from politico, "during a breakfast with republican leaders multiple members said they were disturbed by the chants to representative omar and to relay their message to trump which he agreed to do. >> i'm disgusted in america for allowing this to happen. >> there are certain things about america that aren't loveable. people are entitled to their opinions. >> i think if you're going to be here, you've got to obey our laws and abide within the things that we have set here. >> for anybody to say that, it's appalling. for the president of the united states to say it is disgraceful. >> i think he's dead on. this immigration problem our congress has got to get their
act together. >> as an immigrant, i feel that's very, very disrespectful and very, very hurtful because for me and most of us, this is our home. >> trump's next rally is set for august 1st. cincinnati, ohio. today reporters asked him about his message to his supporters. and feld stop them if they repeated that same send her back chant. >> well, these are people that love our country. i want them to keep loving our country and i think the congress women, by the way, should be more positive than they are. the congress women have a lot of problems. the congressmen and women also have a big obligation in this country and in every country frankly but they have a big obligation and the obligation is to love your country. >> that brings us to our leadoff discussion on a thursday night and for that, peter baker, chief white house correspondent for the "new york times," kimberly atkins for wbru, boston's npr
news station, and david jolly from the state of florida who has since left the house and his political party. kim, i'd like to regin with you from ashley parker of the "washington post" in attendance last night in north carolina. the president paused as if to let the moment unfurl to fan oxygen onto the racial animus to his base. he let go of the lectern and stared forward before swiveling to right. for 13 full seconded the crowd shouted that omar, a u.s. congresswoman and citizen should be sent back to the country from which she fled. in the aftermath, many in trump's orbit squirmed and wriggled sighing that perhaps the crowd had crossed a line but generally unwilling to condemn the president himself. kim, do you get the unmistakable view that this has become more
ominous by the day over four days of this? >> i think so. look, we know, we've seen from the last four years that there are places where donald trump feels more comfortable and more himself than at a rally. he knows how to deal with the crowd. he knows how to respond to the crowd and play off the crowd. i think ashley did a pretty brilliant job of describing exactly how he did it. he heard what the crowd was chanting. he stood there and he let the chant go through. it wasn't until the chant itself died down that he started to speak again. in a very showmanship type of way that we've seen many times before. so any claim that he tried to tamp that down is just, you know, he's asking you not to believe your own eyes in that sense. but to your question, yes, we have seen this president before even when he steps back from a controversy especially when it's one about cultural divisions that he has sewn, we've seen him
ultimately snap back. if you recall after charlottes vi, he initially came out and gave sort of a staid response that he read, but added the words "many sides." and when he received criticism from that, it was when is he came back at that infrastructure press conference and unleashed and totally went off and said that it was very fine people on both sides and really reversed and went back to his original comments. i think that very well cohappen here. he clearly was comfortable where he was at that the rally and there are republicans now pushing back. but if he is criticized, he's going to go back to his gut. that's what we've seen him do time and time again. i don't think this is over. >> peter baker, as you know well, sometimes you have to listen to the president and he will preview his own actions. i'm going to play for our audience a quote you by now know by heart. this is before the v fp w in 2018. >> just remember, what you're
seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening. just stick with us. don't believe the crap you see from these people. the fake news. >> so peter, with that in mind, weren't his comments today just a natural extension? >> well, look, he has repeatedly asked americans to believe his version of events, his narrative that he is setting over not just the viewpoints orrections of other people who happen to be in a room but the very videotapes or audio tapes we've seen. in the last few weeks alone, we saw him deny that he called meghan markle, the new duchess in britain tin nasty. he denied that the facility in texas that vice president pence saw was crowded and troubled. he denied that he had said even a small thing like whether he called tim cook of apple whether he called him tim apple or not. he did, the tape makes it very
clear he did. he denied it at first. it's don't believe what you hear or see, believe what i'm telling you. a lot of people who believe in him believe he's telling a larger truth. they understand he might not be getting the facts specifically right or not completely honest about this or that. they see somebody speaking truth to power in a way. that's why they react to what they saw last night, his vision of an america that is under siege by you know, by this multicultural immigration friendly evolution of a country that makes people feel at least some people feel uncomfortable. that's what he's playing, too. >> david jolly, i have two things for you. this is the president on monday. >> does it concern you that many people saw that tweet as racist and that white nationalist groups are finding common cause with you on that point? >> it didn't concern me because many people agree with me.
>> and david, that kind of language had people thinking back to a different politician and a different time. this clip that a lot of people may remember. >> i can't trust obama. i have read about him and he's not -- he's not -- he's an arab. he is not -- >> no, ma'am. no ma'am. >> no? >> no, ma'am, no, ma'am. he's a decent family man, citizen that i just happened to have disagreements with on fundamental issues and that's what this campaign is all about. he's not. thank you. >> so david, a number of questions. how did we get here? that shows the migration in viewpoint, tone and tenor among republican politicians. how did we get here. is this locked in now as how this president is going to run for re-election? because candidly, it would be rather striking at this point if he pivoted and started
campaigning on jobs and the economy. >> right, we've seen the real donald trump. it's a failure in leadership that stands in stark contrast to somebody like senator john mccain who rose to the moment of leadership when the nation looked to him at exactly a moment like you just played. you know, brian, we're four days into this. it's been an exhausting 24-hour news cycle. a lot of people like myself have gone from shock to anger to heart break. i am optimistic tonight coming out of what we saw at the minnesota airport. what i mean by that is, i'm optimistic because the leaders who fail us politically, the donald trumps, the lindsey grahams, the kevin mccarthys, their moments are fleeting. their legacies dim early. what we're seeing tonight i believe are the early moments of ilhan omar securing a very special place in american history, consider one of just a handful of refugees who have risen top elective office in the united states congress.
now at an inflection point in this 230-year conversation over the freedom of dissent, our nation was founded on dissent, a bunch of people who said to the king we can do better. they wrote into the constitution an awareness they needed to protect the freedom of dissent, madison wrote virtually every one of the frees in the first amendments has to do with dissent from organized religion to speech to assembly to petition your government. and those constitutional freedoms, that's the very same constitution ilhan omar in 2000 raised her right-hand and pledged true faith and allegiance, too. that 17-year-old girl last night had to listen to an angry mob chant us that she needed to leave the country. no ego driven political leader can undo the protections written by james madison. the reason i'm optimistic and we can great is this a moment where we are watching founders' vision play out. it is exactly ilhan omar's
dissent, her freedom of dissent that our founders envisioned, exactly the dangerous behavior of donald trump and the mob last night that they also envisioned and that is why they wrote into a constitute freedom of ilhan omar that ultimately will prevail in this very dark chapter. >> that's no fair. i have to pivot of that at the risk of ruining a moment of madisonian optimism, how does congress possibly get anything done in let's just say the next few business days they have before the summer break. >> you know, it's difficult. there are big things that need to be tackled like the debt ceiling for the congress to take on. and it is difficult. but on the other hand, you do see congress moving. the house voed to pass a minimum wage bill. and so it a lot of the it is up to the president. the president is in full re-election mode and he is bob all wanting to paint the democratic party as being led by
these four members of congress. not intent to wait for who the democratic nominee is. we have to see if congressman jolly is right and if the vision of america that embraces the vision that these four members stand for is something that america will take over the very nationalistic approach that the president is putting forward. but congress will move on and there will be new things ahead that will grab the president's attention at the top of that list will be robert mueller's testimony next wednesday. that i'm sure he will shift his attention to, but you know, this is the new washington. it's the new normal here how we go from one controversy as difficult as this controversy over racism has been to the next. >> peter, let's talk about reaction and i know you're out in the rocky mountains tonight but i know your phone still works. let's talk about members of the pliant gop under donald trump,
perhaps members of the trump circle in the west wing. has their position changed, migrate, hardened over four days. >> there's clearly a great deal of discomfort about this. republicans spent years trying to reinvent their image away from you know, a white dominated party to one that welcomed minorities, welcomed people of different faiths, welcomed a multicultural kind of support. if you're looking at the demographics in your political party, you've got to move beyond just a single demographic here. to watch what's these last few days seems to many to throw that away. even ivanka trump according to colleagues tonight went to her father and said this has gone too far. that's one of the reasons he disavowed the chants of the crowd. that doesn't mean he's going to back off. this is central to his re-election strategy as far as we can tell. us against them strategy. they stand for a different kind of america. we stand for the america that we
remember interest the old days. what's remarkable he's saying if you disagree with me, if you disagree with me, that means you're against america. this is a president who came to office on a platform of you know quite vigorous criticism of the way america had been going. american carnage. make america great again means america wasn't great then. he said we were no better than russia. he disagreed with the term american exceptionalism. at that time he was arguing i have a policy disagreement with the leaders of america. i'll make it better. now these four young congress woman are in effect effect saying we disagree with your leadership and he's saying you have to leave the country. >> david jolly while good people everywhere pray that your brand of optimism carries the day, i have to say as a southerner, you are also familiar with the playbook of the old-time segregationists and what has bothered so many people in week is that so many of these talking
points are way too familiar, given our past couple decades of history in this country. >> yeah, i'm glad you asked that. it's why the moment with lindsey graham was such a disgusting one today on capitol hill, kevin mccarthy, as well. they are intentionally shifting this from center back to love it or leave it, if you don't love the country go home. to peter's point love to them is suggesting agreement. if you don't agree with republicans you must go home. love it or leave it is essentially a narrative of quieting dissent in the united states and it is as scary ascend her back. donald trump will embrace that. there is a certain visceral appeal to it. it is also those why those who insulate him on capitol hill, if they do not understand that knewance of what love it or leave it means, they're too foolish in office to be and it's time to vote them out again, as
well. >> our thanks for starting off our conversation on this thursday night. coming up, what we're learning this evening from new documents released in the hush money case involving the president's former lawyer michael cohen. and later, the line-up is set with much fanfare. we'll map out the democratic candidates, how they will share the stage over two more nights of debate, all 20 of them. "the 11th hour" just getting started on this thursday night. g started on this thursday night xfinity mobile is a wireless network
the 2016 hush money scheme to keep adult film star stormy daniels quiet about her alleged affair with citizen donald trump. the documents reveal an fbi agent investigating the matter wrote that in the days following the release of that "access hollywood" video, cohen exchanged a series of calls, test messages, e mails with stormy daniels' attorney and david pecker, dylan howard of ami, hope hicks and candidate donald trump. the agent went on to write, quote, based on the timing of these calls, and the content of the text messages and emails, i believe that at least some of these communications concerned the need to prevent clifford from going public, particularly in the wake of the "access hollywood" story. we should note the fbi says phone records were completely derived from cohen -- i'm sorry. this information was completely derived from cohen's phone
records and not because they had any recording or any copies of donald trump's calls. "the new york times" points out today these documents signal that it is unlikely prosecutors in this case will file any more charges as part of this hush money investigation. prosecutors said they had effectively concluded their inquiry. for more on what this all means, we are so happy to be joined once again tonight by kneel neal katyal, a have the ran of the justice department, former acting solicitor general during the obama administration, a man who has argued 39 cases before the u.s. supreme court. counselor, what stood out to you today? for a lay audience, myself included, what happened in this case today? >> today the documents that were around the search warrant were released. what stands out number one is what donald trump's involvement in this whole thing was. i think we've gotten kind of inured to his racism, his corruption and his she's, but
you read these documents and boy, the president was thick in the payments to stormy daniels, this $130,000 payments that he orchestrated his lawyer, mike cohen, to make. and michael cohen is actually going to jail for those payments. and so i think one thing that's happened today is really a tie-in directly of trump to this whole thick which we kind of new because he was already named individual number one. again, it's pretty stark to see this about a sitting president of the united states. so that's the first thing. and then the second thing i'd say is, you know, it also shows the involvement of other people in the trump orbit. hope hicks, who went to congress last month and testified and said i didn't know anything about this and didn't really have any involvement and i wasn't present when michael cohen was talking to donald trump, the reports show actually she was involved in all this and knew quite a bit. both of those things, i think, are significant. they suggest that really michael cohen wasn't acting alone, which is, frankly, pretty obvious.
i mean, if your lawyer paid $130,000 to someone or $10 to someone, you would be like, what's this about? trump's defense, i think, has been i didn't know anything about these payments from his own lawyer. i don't think michael cohen was doing it out of the generosity out of his own heart. >> after all you laid out, why is the only person charged, cohen, and secondly, what real legal jeopardy could hope hicks find herself in as a result of getting cross ways here? >> there's a crime about lying to congress, that's perjury. so on. congress man nadler tonight, the democratic leader of the house judiciary committee has asked hope historics to come in and clarify her testimony given what she said before. so there is the possibility of a crime for that. and then second question is who else could be indicted. and i think we've all known since last year when these first documents were released by federal prosecutors that
individual number one is donald trump, and the federal prosecutors are basically saying, look, this guy committed a crime. now, there's a department of justice policy that prevents the indictment of a sitting president, but there's nothing to prevent donald trump from being indicted for these campaign finance violations after he leaves office and indeed the statute of limitations doesn't expire until 2021. >> what's the likelihood of either one of those happening? hope hicks getting found to have perjured herself in front of congress or donald trump civilian facing actual charges the day after the inauguration? >> if you have a real leader of the justice department who's going to look at this fairly and appropriately, i think there is a risk. if you think about it, these are the most significant campaign contributions in united states history. these are only $130,000 to be sure, but they occurred at a really sensitive time, after the "access hollywood" tape and when the president was being pummeled for his treatment of women and the idea that he could then just go get this money secretly
without anyone knowing about it, without him disclosing it on his campaign finance disclosures, or michael cohen or anyone else, that's a really serious thing. i mean, when i was in the justice department, if i did something like that, i would have been run out of office, as i think anyone rightly would have. and so i think it's a very significant crime and something that any justice department that actually did do the prosecution that the justice department is traditionally known for would go after. >> neal katyal has agreed to stay with us just as we fit in a break. coming up we'll get his take from this dangerous rhetoric from the nation's commander in chief, now being echoed out loud by his supporters when we come back. by his supporters when we come back
>> we are back. here is how susan glasser of the "new yorker" sums up how people are processing the words from this president these last four days. half of the country is appalled, but not really sure how to combat him. the other half is cheering, or at least averting its gaze. this is what a political civil war looks like, with words, for now, as weapons. still with us is neal katyal. neal, i'd like to ask you a more personal question. as a south asian-american in the history of supreme court jurisprudence, your position is now cemented for all time. as an american in the history of supreme court jurisprudence, your position is cemented for
all time. and yet, you have a near-daily familiarity with the phrase go back where you came from. >> yeah, i've heard it my whole life. it started when i was three years old and it continues on. it's easy to slug it off when it's a rando in a parking lot. or whatever. the thought that a president of the united states would be saying that and encouraging it and sitting by for 13 seconds when others are cheering it, i can't think of a bigger betrayal of our constitutional promise. our national motto goes back to the found og of our constitution, e pluribus unum, out of many one. that's why my parents came to this country. that's why we respect the flag and cheer the flag and cheer what this country is about. donald trump doesn't even begin to understand that basic foundational commitment. >> as i remind our viewers who may not know, you have praised
some of this president's nominees, so it's not party politics to you, but i say that as a precursor to the question, what's been lost in this presidency? >> it's not at all politics. you can be supportive of republicans or you can be critical of these four women in congress that the president is attacking, as i am in various ways, but it's not about them. this is about a very simple idea, which is we respect people who come here from other countries and, frankly, three of them did, they just happen to have brown skin. but we respect people who come from other countries. we don't care about that. that's what we fought a civil war about. if trump wants to return us back to the ante bell lum era, he can try, but this country is way too strong, too powerful and our values are too dear in our hearts for that to happen. so what's lost, brian, i think what's lost is the sense of civic communication and fairness and watching this breakdown in the president who's cheering it
on who hopes for it as opposed to a president mo doesn't necessarily have to always bring us together but to prey on the racial divisions and the kind of hurt and pain that people feel, i mean, i can't think of something more disqualifying to be president of the united states than the way he has behaved this week. i'm critical of him about his obstruction of justice and his conspiracy and all sorts of other things but this is a true betrayal of everything the country is all about. >> this is cheating because i heard your answer to ari melber. preview for me what would be your first three questions to robert mueller in a little less than a week. >> i think this is pretty simple. mueller is going to come in. he wants to talk about the report. the americans need to know what's in the report. so the president said in a tweet that mueller found no collusion no obstruction and that it totally exonerates the president. so three simple questions, number one, mr. mueller, did you find no collusion?
number two, mr. mueller, did you find no obstruction? number three, mr. mueller, did your report totally exonerate the president? the answer to those are in the report, but i think for him to say it and for all americans to hear it as opposed to read through and thumb through a 448-page report, it will be devastating to the president. >> counselor, thank you for stopping by our studios. >> thank you. >> neal katyal on the broadcast tonight. coming up, the lineup for the next democratic debate in detroit, michigan, is set. two more nights, 20 in all. we'll break it all down when we come back.
drawing a few hours ago with grant fare to pick which night the 20 qualified candidates will take the stage in detroit later this month. on the first night, tuesday, july 30th, elizabeth warren gets her first debate matchup with bernie sanders. they'll be on stage with williamson, ryan, klobuchar, buttigieg, o'rourke, hickenlooper, delaney, and bullock. he's the new entry, by the way, replacing swalwell who fell out of the race. night two, july 31, joe biden and kamala harris return as the big names side by side. joining them, bennet, gillibrand, castro, booker, yang, gabbard, inslee, and de blasio. so with us tonight, stoddard, a.b. stoddard, columnist and associated editor at real clear politics. and eliza collins, covering the 2020 campaign for the "wall street journal." welcome to you both. a. b., two things i despises are
covering these things like a sporting event and even the idea of a live audience at these events, i think it detracts from the answers, wastes time and weights the audience with those who can have more people in the crowd. having established that, tell us what you're looking for by way of a dynamic this second time between biden and cam ma lal harris. >> right. well, i mean, i agree with you, brian. let's just admit, this is a mess. it's going to be a mess until we have eight people on stage on one night. and that the top pollers face each other and contrast and challenge each other and have an actual debate, which we're not really going to see this time. i have a feeling that kamala harris is not going to go after joe biden again. it was a risky ploy, she got some benefit out of it, but she also got some backlash. it will be interesting to see now that she's on the upswing
whether or not she goes back at that or just tries to sell herself, continue to be sort of this great contestant against donald trump that she's trying to make the case that she is. biden has to be ready for everybody. booker is going to take him on. he's on stage with bill de blasio again, very difficult for anyone to deal with bill de blasio who's going to insert himself repeatedly. and i think it is an interesting lineup because i think that there's going to be people like booker who sort of had a good debate last time like castro that need to sort of break out of the pack this time and they could be have an aggressive. >> eliza, pick a grouping, a pairing, any pairing. what are the matchups and dynamics you're looking for? >> all right. i'll go the first night. >> okay. >> the first night we have warren and sanders are sort of the two front-runners of the night. i'm really interested to watch how they interact because they really do agree on so many different policies here.
sanders talked about a lot of these policies in 2016 and brought a lot of democrats on board, including warren. and they're competing for a similar section of progressive voters. but warren has been rising and sanders has sort of been stagnant or falling in polls. so it's going to be competitive. and around them are a whole bunch of moderate democrats. who like a.b. mentioned the first night, there's a group of democrats who really need to break through. and so these people have been attacking sanders for medicare for all. i expect that to continue. steve bullock, john delaney, these are folks that are going to continue those attack lines because they want to have their moment. so we have a lot of moderates trying to break out. and then with two really progressive people in the center trying to outdo each other. >> both of these journalists have agreed to stay with us as we fit in another break. coming up, what it was that we witnessed from that crowd at the trump rally in north carolina just last night.
he spreads this hate and he does it for no other reason but to, one, invigorate his base, and two, to divide so people don't notice what else is going on. >> he must be blind and deaf because if he didn't hear what they were saying, i don't understand it. look, this is a game. this is about dividing the country. this is about dividing and raising the issue of racism across the country. >> some of trump's opponents blasting him after those "send her back" chants rose up from the audience at that rally in north carolina and went 13 seconds before being interrupted by the president. they were, of course, specifically targeting congresswoman omar, one of the four congresswomen the president has spent these past few days attacking. bernie sanders today posted that he was with the minnesota
democrat last night as the crowd started chanting, he said she was unfazed and he went on to write, ilhan has incredible courage. she won't back down to trump's hate and neither will we. politico magazine puts last night into context and we quote, earlier in the week when trump defended himself against charges of racism, insisting many people agree with me, it was crowds like these he almost certainly had in mind, but until right then and there, he hadn't heard directly from them. a live audience feeding back direct proof that this was something he could keep running on. back with us are a. b. stoddard and eliza collins. i want to play something for our friend, nicolle wallace on the air just today. >> who is the democratic leader who can say this is a drop-everything, get on an airplane, go to the steps of the capitol, go to a central
location in des moines, iowa, go to new hampshire, hold hands even if you hate each other and say this is who we are. >> a. b., it struck me as a very good question and the kind i'd like to pass along to you. the democrats are going through this so-called purity test. they insys they can chew gum and walk at the same time, that the systemic societal issues they want to go about fixing can also be in the form of a candidate. do you see a an unifier out there, the kind of person nicolle was just talking about? >> that is the central question, brian. i mean, joe biden is still the lead poller. he is the person that most people have expressed faith and confidence in in their one mission which is to beat donald trump. this is also a very divided party. and donald trump is on to a few things. the chant last night was
repugnant. but he knows there's a constituency for this just as you describe from politico's description of this. he knows that there is. he also knows that ilhan omar or row shift ta tlaib or smiz cortes are going to give this nominee whoever it is a hard tile and they will exact a xurity test on whoever ends up leading the party. it will be divisive. he wants the party, he wants ha bernie scene. he wants leaders of the party to be married to these four. he's used that verb. they've married them. so while the speaker will continue to fight with these people when they give her a hard time and say seize coding abusers in detention centers by rushing this money off and not demanding more concessions, from republicans, this is a central question among democrats, how
will we pull together behind a nominee and who it be? it is no longer clear it's joe biden unless he comes back fighting and describes to the party that the path forward is through the center in convincing terms. but he's going to get so much heat from the left from now until the end of this race and we just don't know if he's going to win it. >> eliza use your equally formidable powers of description, what must it be like for a republican member of congress, let's say a member of congress that just scooted by in the last election to defend and protect that seat with this going on? >> well, incredibly uncomfortable. we saw some of our colleagues on the hill reporting someone like martha mcsolely in arizona who actually lost her senate election in 2018 and then was appointed to a seat but is up in 2020. she was on her phone every time she walked past reporters. they do not want to talk about this. it is incredibly uncomfortable
because while the base certainly does agree with the president or have appeal to the president on this, there are a whole lost americans that deeply, deeply disagree. and these republicans in tough districts and states have to win over a lot more han the base but they also can't lose the base. so they're in this very tough predicament. we saw people not talking about these comments for about 4 hours and until last night when we saw the chants happen, republicans did start to come out today and criticize the chants but they were careful not to criticize the president. and that is just kind of shows how they're trying to have it both ways here. it's very uncomfortable for them. >> these are two by lines viewers should look for, a.b. stoddard and eliza collins. thanks to you both for helping our conversation tonight. coming up, a word about the anniversary that you're planet is marking here this week. finding dental insurance plans can be confusing,
hospital gown waiting to get my eyes checked?" ready? absolutely not. see, having the wrong coverage can mean you get the wrong care, or you're paying more than you have to. that's why i love healthmarkets, your insurance marketplace. they make sure you have the right coverage, health insurance, medicare, and yes, dental too. wow, think that's painful? wait 'til he gets the bill. a cavity can cost as much as $350 and a root canal, whoa. but with healthmarkets, for less than a dollar a day, you can save a bundle every time you go to the dentist. exams, cleanings, and x-rays, those are covered at 100%. that sounds free to me. plus healthmarkets has plans with coverage for fillings, crowns, dentures, even root canals. with over 200,000 dental providers to choose from, it's easy to get the care you need. heck, there's even options with no waiting periods. call today, and you can save tomorrow. now, that'll keep you smiling. hi, i'm dr. ron o'neal.
in my practice, i've seen how expensive dental procedures can absolutely devastate a family's budget. don't put off needed dental work just because you think you can't afford it. let healthmarkets find you a dental plan that can start saving you money right away. they even have plans with no waiting periods. call healthmarkets now to get the right plan and save money. healthmarkets can truly put that smile back on your face. and get this, healthmarkets guarantees the lowest price on the plans they offer. want to know how much they can save you? call healthmarkets. they make finding insurance fast and easy because they know you have better things to do. your insurance marketplace, healthmarkets. call healthmarkets now. call the number on your screen call this number now.
at just about this very moment, 50 years ago tonight, at pol low 11 astronauts fired the rockets that put them into lunar orbit. one of the last necessary steps before following their glide path on down to the lunar surface. and during that summer of 1969, life went on while they were up there, but all of us. down here in the cheap seats prepared to
hold our breath knowing the hard part was yet to come. it's fair to say this country saw the mission in realtime as it is correctly viewed today by those are perspective as perhaps the apex of post-war america. the sheer science of it amazed us. it got us to the moon and back and yet, when viewed through the lens of 2019, there's way more science in one smartphone than was on board that entire spacecraft, not even close. it's also true we can thank the space program for the smartphone and for portable computers and gps and smoke alarms and leds and cat scans and so many of the products of our modern life. and as you watch the coverage these next few days of those first footsteps on the moon, don't forget about the courage. it was so widely assumed of those first astronauts that we hardly mention it anymore. two of the three apollo 11
astronauts were west pointers, two of the three were test pilots. buzz aldrin shot down multiple soviet mig in dogfights in the korean war. between them these three guys had flown everything. they had all pushed the end of the envelope and remember this. there was no guarantee that rocket wouldn't explode on the launch pad or in flight, no guarantee they wouldn't crash land on that lunar surface. no guarantee that when neil armstrong press the button to fire the rocks to blast off from the moon and go home, that it would work. president nixon had a statement prepared for delivery and standing by in case those two men had died or had been left abandoned on the lunar surface. think about that. neil armstrong the reluctant taciturn american hero is now gone. buzz aldrin and michael collins survive, so does the legacy of the three brave young men who
took us there and made america so proud. that is our broadcast for this thursday night. thank you so much for being here with us. good night from our nbc news headquarters here in new york. t. tonight on "all in" -- >> "send her back"! "send her back"! >> the nation reels from the ugliness stoked by the president. >> when your supporters last night were chanting "send her back," why didn't you stop them? >> tonight, why the republican party cannot back away from the situation they created. >> i believe he is fascist. >> and congressman jerry nadler on what democrats plan to do about it. plus -- >> knock the crap out of them. >> new alarms about the nonhypothetical threats of violence stemming from trump rallies. >> it is about creating a volatile environment in this country through violent rhetoric. >> and what we are learning today from court documents about donald trump's involvement in a