Skip to main content

tv   The Beat With Ari Melber  MSNBC  January 10, 2020 3:00pm-4:00pm PST

3:00 pm
cover on this busy friday night, all eyes right now on speaker pelosi, she has made news in no uncertain terms on the new action in the impeachment fight. we'll bring that to you. also later tonight, our friend "art of the deal" coauthor, and a special report on rudy giuliani and his trip to ukraine. i have footage you have probably not seen based on the way we found it. it is a strange story and it's our special report a little later in the hour. our top story right now, speaker pelosi making it official. she is now formally promising a major development here in what looks like an onramp to a trial in this impeachment fight. let me explain. she has released through a letter to colleagues today an announcement that she has now asked judiciary chair nadler to bring a resolution to the house floor next week appointing managers, those are like the prosecutors of donald trump in a senate trial, and to do what so many have been asking to transmit the articles to the
3:01 pm
senate. there's no exact timetable on when a trial could start. could be soon. pelosi insisting that this is how she wanted it to be, she's setting the time line, there was no internal divide over her strategy. >> absolutely total cooperation. it cracks me up to see on tv, oh, pressure. i have news for them. you don't have a story. >> some of this, though, does come from reporting that speaker pelosi's own democratic allies were at times stumped about holding these articles back for so long when they weren't at least over time getting public concessions from mitch mcconnell. pelosi, though, does have an argument for that tonight. she is saying she made headway and that time itself was on the side of pressure and gathering evidence. pointing to the new evidence that revealed about how the white house was plotting the ukraine scream and it's certainly true there were new e-mails that came from unrelated
3:02 pm
litigation as well as something that everyone watching this case, including people at the white house know. in the time while pelosi was holding on to these articles, john bolton decided to come out and publicly offer to testify under subpoena to the senate. cracks in the republican party approach here. two senators now openly criticizing mcconnell's approach to the trial and now self-proclaimed moderate republican susan collins is showing something that many people had not predicted. she is a republican who says she is now working on a plan to ensure some witnesses do appear in this trial. collins telling reporters in her home state of maine that she's working all week, in fact, and has been talking to a quote fairly small group of republican senators as well as party leaders on this witness issue and she is quote hopeful they will find an agreement on how to proceed with a trial that would allow the opportunity for the house and the president's council to have these witnesses if they so choose. collins telling nbc, and this is interesting, it is important
3:03 pm
that both sides are treated fairly. having witnesses testify is of course one of the most crucial elements of any trial. just ask old lindsey graham or old mitch mcconnell or a lot of other people involved in trials. the new reporting is a sign that the time that has been passing seems to be going towards more of a trial and less of a slam dunk dismissal. with that, we turn to our two experts tonight, people you will recognize that we have come to rely on on this evolving story. chuck rosenberg, a former federal prosecutor, senior fbi official, former acting head of the dea, an msnbc analyst, and "new york times" reporter, i should say "new york times" contributor, michelle goldberg, you write for the opinion page, and i know you as a long time writer as well. thank you for joining me on this friday night. >> thank you. >> michelle people who read you in the "new york times," who have seen you on this and other programs know that long before it was fashionable in washington to say force impeachment and force trial you advocated that on substantiative grounds, not a
3:04 pm
political thing, but you thought it was warranted. with that in mind, i wonder what you think about susan collins and others making news by saying maybe not only will you have a beginning of a trial, you might have witnesses. >> i think that that's a profound relief, and nancy pelosi had very little leverage here, right, i mean, the senate's controlled by republicans, they had very little incentive to cooperate with her, and so i think by playing the card she was dealt, she was at least able to create enough of a public controversy to get these comment on the record before the articles are transmitted, and right, this is what it's always been all about. getting witnesses and particularly getting john bolton, right, i think if john bolton tells what he knows, assuming that he actually tells what he knows and doesn't just participate in some sort of cover up, i think if that makes it much harder for, not for all, you know, the senate is probably still going to acquit, but it
3:05 pm
does put pressure on those senators who either have reputations as moderates or are running for reelection in swing states. >> this is clearly, chuck, a democratic push thus far to get these witnesses. when republican starts come along, they are as a matter of the divisions in the senate, they are going towards what the democrats have been advocating, although outside of the political realm, it is fairly traditional to have witnesses at trials, regardless of your ideology. just ask for your analysis, just ask mitch mcconnell, here he was back in the day on larry king. >> there have been 15 impeachments in the history of this country, two of them were cut short by resignations, and the other 13 impeachments, they were witnesses. it's not unusual to have a witness in a trial. it's certainly not unusual to have a witness in an impeachment trial. >> the house managers have only asked for three witnesses. i think that's pretty modest. >> right. so in trials we have this thing called evidence and evidence
3:06 pm
consists of typically witnesses and documents and witnesses we hope come and tell the truth. and if they do, then the jurors, in this case, the senators, have a better basis on which to make an informed judgment. you know, i hope you're right that we hear from john bolton. i fear, however, we won't, regardless of whether or not witnesses are called because there's this big thing still hanging over john bolton's testimony which is the possibility that the president invokes executive privilege. >> go on. >> yeah, so there's this thing called privileges and they're real. there's all kinds of 5th amendment privileges, attorney general client, executive privilege has been invoked by presidents of both parties back to the beginning of this nation. the problem is that because it's a real thing, executive privilege, it's intended to, you know, protect confidential discussions between a president and his most senior advisers, it would have to be litigated before bolton, if the president
3:07 pm
invokes it, we would have to litigate whether or not certain questions and certain answers impede on that privilege. >> so on that point, take a listen to the president now, who also made news today as the republicans have pushed him a little bit with the idea that this could happen. he's jumped in to say, wait, he would do what you're talking about. >> why not call bolton, why not allow him to testify. this thing is bogus. >> i would have no problem other than one thing. i'm talking about future, many future presidents, and have a security adviser, anybody having to do with security and legal and other things. >> you're going to invoke executive privilege? >> well, i think you have to for the sake of the office. >> and i should say in fairness, donald trump has a long standing interest in the stake of the office. >> an institutionalist. >> if you have read the writings about his views of the constitution, executive powers back before the reality show
3:08 pm
days are interesting. >> i'm surprised these words are about to come out of my mouth, but that wasn't crazy, there is a real thing called executive privilege, and as a society we have recognized that there's a fundamental value in protecting certain types of conversations, but you cannot use privileges to cover up a crime, for instance. all right. there are exceptions to privileges, the problem is to get there, you have to litigate it. >> the chief justice of supreme court is presiding over this trial. how much does it have to go through the courts as opposed to allowing him to rule on it then and there. >> it's a great question. it sort to have depends on when the issue arises. i mean, the president and the white house could in theory go to court now, before an impeachment trial starts and seek a declaratory judgment that an executive privilege should protect any conversation between the president and bolton, so it depends. i know you probably hate that as an answer from a lawyer, but it
3:09 pm
depends. >> do you think you could have a partial amount of information where some of those things are segmented off but if you ask john bolton about, for example, the president's public statements, demanding this investigation, and what light he could shed on that outside of the privilege? >> that would be a way to do it. so if you know there's privileged stuff, and you believe there's nonprivileged stuff, a good prosecutor could craft questions to only elicit the nonprivileged stuff. you could try that, but if the president invokes in some way, it may have to be litigated to michelle's point. >> and michelle, the other thing i want to ask you about is the way that donald trump's defenders double down on everything doesn't always work. it may enrage, and it may get attention, but this is a process whereby whether you lose a few senate votes can change, as we have discussed who testified, and so i wonder if you think just as we saw in iran, some of that didn't work, and republican senators pushed back, we're seeing that with collins here, and we're seeing that as a
3:10 pm
response to say, well, i just showed for mcconnell, lindsey graham, well known, we actually had several of their former colleagues on a special panel together on the beat. listen to a little bit of that regarding the shift from lindsey graham. >> you have members of the senate who already declare what verdict is before they have seen the trial. >> i don't think anybody can explain what happened to lindsey graham. >> he had to have had a mind change operation. it's unbelievable for me to watch lindsay now because i remember distinctly lindsay saying you can't have a trial without witnesses. now he says we don't need any witnesses. wow, that is a flip-flop of all time. >> do you think that some of trump's defenders, including mr. graham here, may have actually pushed collins in the other direction? >> you know, i would say i'm far past the .3 years in of expecting any kind of decency or consistency from any republicans, really.
3:11 pm
i'm pleasantly surprised that collins said she's going to fight for witnesses, and a small group is all you need given the makeup of the senate. i'm not counting on it. i do think that at the very least, this cover up will be televised, right, the process of the cover up. the arguments against letting the country hear from, you know, hear from john bolton, and hear from mick mulvaney, hear from rudy giuliani, for that matter, who seems to want to testify. you know, at least that will be public at the very very least. right, so that the country can hear about what this president doesn't want them to hear. >> i think you make a great point, and that's why understanding these rules as chuck and you and others have helped us do, does cut against the cynicism and the nothing matters idea because they're going to have to take votes and the public is going to see it on both sides what the senate is trying to do or not do when it comes to finding the facts. i want to thank michelle
3:12 pm
goldberg and chuck i want you to stick around as we get to a whole different side of chuck goldberg later in the show. that's my tease for that. a special report on rudy giuliani's trip to ukraine. we have now reviewed hours of his footage. we're going to show you what matters, particularly with regard to donald trump's looming trial. and trump releasing to fox news new details, he says about what iran was going to do that his own administration kept allegedly from congress. and "art of the deal" coarthur is back with how donald trump will handle the try. i'm ari melber, you're watching "the beat." , you're watching "the beat. thur is back with how trump will handle the try. i'm ari melber, you're watching "the beat." uthur is back with hd trump will handle the try. i'm ari melber, you're watching "the beat." r is back with how d trump will handle the try. i'm ari melber, you're watching "the beat." or is back with how d trump will handle the try. i'm ari melber, you're watching "the beat." lber, you're watchin "the beat.
3:13 pm
before discovering nexium 24hr to treat her frequent heartburn, marie could only imagine enjoying freshly squeezed orange juice. now no fruit is forbidden. nexium 24hr stops acid before it starts for all-day, all-night protection. can you imagine 24 hours without heartburn? proof i can fight moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. proof i can fight psoriatic arthritis... ...with humira. proof of less joint pain... ...and clearer skin in psa. humira targets and blocks a source of inflammation that contributes to joint pain and irreversible damage. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common
3:14 pm
and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. humira is proven to help relieve pain, stop further joint damage,... ...and clear skin in psa. want more proof? ask your rheumatologist about humira.
3:15 pm
wthat's why xfinity hasu made taking your internetself. and tv with you a breeze. really? yup. you can transfer your service online in about a minute. you can do that? yeah. and with two-hour service appointment windows, it's all on your schedule. awesome. so while moving may still come with its share of headaches... no kidding. we're doing all we can to make moving simple, easy, awesome. go to to get started.
3:16 pm
guess who's back, maybe it feels like he never left. rudy giuliani back with a new defense of his client donald trump writing publicly that the supreme court should now declare this entire impeachment unconstitutional, which doesn't make much sense since it is the constitution that provides for this impeachment process, so giuliani is back in a big way, and he is not someone you can completely ignore if you want to understand what the senate trial of the sitting president will look like and involve, so for that reason, we have a very special report on what giuliani's been up to and why some of donald trump's closest advisers want him to stop, to be quiet, we're going to delve into why he literally just went to ukraine as donald trump was getting impeached and how it
3:17 pm
may, as i mentioned, backfire. that's when we're back in 30 seconds. so when a hailstorm hit, usaa reached out before he could even inspect the damage. that's how you do it right. usaa insurance is made just the way martin's family needs it - with hassle-free claims, he got paid before his neighbor even got started. because doing right by our members, that's what's right. usaa. what you're made of, we're made for. usaa watch as president trump's personal attorney and veteran prosecutor rudy giuliani together with one american news calls up top ukrainian diplomats and officials as witnesses to testify under oath, their side of the story. the side that not only destroys adam schiff's case for impeachment but uncovers what may be one of the greatest cover
3:18 pm
ups of our time. >> greatest cover ups of our time. what is the real cover up in the ukraine scandal? the answer is actually important. it could impact donald trump's impeachment trial, and it's where our special report begins right now. what you're looking at here is the ultimate in impeachment counter programming from the conservative outlet, "one america news" or oan. that's a name you might recognize as the media company goes sometimes where fox news will not, in the middle of the impeachment scandal, oan sent a correspondent to literally travel with giuliani to ukraine in hungary for a three-part special, conducting joint interviews with some of the ukrainian prosecutors and government veterans wrapped up in the very conspiracy theory that got donald trump impeached. so when you hear about rudy giuliani gathering information in ukraine, this is part of how that now works, and here at "the beat," we as a team here have watched the whole oan special so you don't have to unless you
3:19 pm
want to, but let me give you the context. entrepreneur robert herring founded oan with a pitch that echoes roger ailes brand for news, a conservative line that promises that its perspective itself is the credible patriotic choice. >> it's time to switch things up. if you're looking for credible news, then you've come to the right place. when america's ready, are you. >> but in a world where groups with all kinds of agendas increasingly can mimic the format of media to push their agenda, we should note the company was no announced in se a business setting like the florida stock exchange or a journalism conference, instead, oan officials went to the annual partisan conservative conference, cpac, and pushed the republican party to move further to the right, and a newly minted oan host said the goal of all of their new project was to get
3:20 pm
even and be a platform for political conservatism. >> the solution is quite simple, to quote animal house, don't get mad, we're going to get even. we will not block their conservative message. we will be their platform for the message. >> now, there's not much public data on the daily reach of that platform. the typical system for measuring viewers, nielsen raters are not available for oan. the company says it is available in 35 million homes according to a may press release. it's reached far less than traditional tv channels like fox or cnn but in the trump era, influence can turn on who is watching, not just the total audience, and there are reports that anchors, like pete hegseth and sean hannity, and tucker carlson have shaped trump's decisions on big issues like pardonens and who to hire and fire, so with that wider
3:21 pm
context, note that oan also counts president trump as a very proud viewer. he says he tunes in whenever possible and has shared some of their segments online to his 70 million followers. now, that link may shed some light on how to categorize oan, a question that is worth considering would be is this a journalistic outlet that overlaps with conservatives or is it more of a political operation that simply mimics the look of journalism. now, oan president charles herring says what they do is quote hard news, fast paced, no fluff, no opinion, and for this report tonight, we reached out to both oan and rudy giuliani for comment. giuliani did not provide public comment but oan has told us, this is in a new statement that they featured a number of guests, including giuliani as is typical on the ukraine trip they paid for his travel. i should also note that the oan network is suing msnbc over a comment made on our air about
3:22 pm
them. now, herring also has told politico that some media outlets won't acknowledge facts, won't do their time consuming investigative work if the facts don't fit their narrative, and he also said they lean to the right no doubt about it. when the trump administration was cracking down on free speech by expelling a journalist from the white house which is government property, consider this interesting story, media outlets united in a joint suit in court against donald trump, and it included fox news. that case was pretty straightforward, so much so that the journalist in there essentially won and was returned access to the white house, but while media outlets and fox were basically over here united in saying, hey, there are some lines the trump administration can't cross, oan sided with the trump effort to crack down on reporter's access, an unusual position for a media outlet. argue some segments do go beyond covering certain political
3:23 pm
agendas to looking like they may endorse them. >> one american news looks at these attacks, what we know, and what we don't know, in our special report, the trail at benghazi, the cost of hillary clinton's dereliction. >> at war with your government. >> they're brainwashed communists trying to kill people. >> the democrats have nothing to run on, so they resorted to racist and soo. >> and quote, rife with the conspiracy theories that circulated widely in trump land. so it's noticeable when oan broadcasts a special featuring the president's lawyer going back to ukraine. politico reported on this big giuliani special noting that oan is trying to out fox fox, and that it challenges journalistic ethics for oan to give giuliani a direct role in preparing its ukraine report.
3:24 pm
but this really matters. millions of viewers in america may think, well, if it looks like news, if it acts like news, it must be somewhat credible news, and this is in a world of fake articles online that are designed to make you think they're real, and lying presidential tweets and now even these deep fake videos. now, there's nothing unusual about the president's lawyer going out to make his case. we have had president trump's lawyer on this very show. the factual issue is how it is done, with giuliani and oan participating in what are joint interviews and something you don't usually see in a lot of this coverage. with all of this in mind, take a look at what the oan special comprises. >> we waded through a dark and mirky, of democratic collusions and ne flagstafarious charges a giuliani. in this next act in the democrats impeachment fairy tail, they needed a villain, a damsel, and a prince. multiple ukrainian sources say
3:25 pm
yovanovitch's embassy was dubbed the clinton campaign headquarters. >> this is evidence. i'm happy i have this document. how i could explain to american public that i am right. >> who controls nabu? >> the u.s. embassy. >> the u.s. embassy controls your law enforcement bureau? >> now, as this special continues, giuliani appears in discussions that could look like interviews, and he makes some claims that have actually already been contradicted by his client donald trump. giuliani says that ukraine, the whole issue that they were pursuing basically fell in his lap as a matter of public interest. trump has publicly confirmed he asked giuliani to work on it. >> the narrative right now is that you looked into ukraine because biden was running for president. >> a complete lie. i looked into ukraine because it was thrown at me, put in my lap. >> oan special also includes
3:26 pm
ukrainian officials that back up giuliani's view that the push for some of those investigations, which are at the heart of the impeachment probe was a just cause. giuliani also rolls out a claim that senators might really want to learn about at this coming trump impeachment trial, giuliani saying he wanted to defend trump in the mueller probe by proving quote somebody else committed the crime. >> in ukraine, many people believe that the request for the investigation was just a request for justice. >> that's the investigation i began in november of 2018. at that time, he was in the middle of the mueller investigation. the president was. >> and you were his personal lawyer. >> and as his defense attorney, this is like gold. all of a sudden, i can prove somebody else committed the crime. and that's why i started it. and the president of the united states, i can tell you this, is asking for this.
3:27 pm
>> amazing. just let me just say exactly why i think that's amazing. in this format that giuliani may have extra control over, he still is making misattactakes t hurt his client trump. he just revealed directions from his client that could otherwise be protected under attorney client privilege. second, he's suggesting a crime occurred that he could put under someone else, anyone could say what crime from the mueller probe, is it charged, and third, he outs trump as asking for this on the program. donald trump denied asking or directing giuliani to do this on an interview on bill o'reilly's podcast. >> did you direct him to go to ukraine and do anything? >> no, i didn't direct him, but he's a warrior, rudy's a warrior. >> if you believe giuliani, trump's lying right there. if you believe trump, giuliani was lying. either way, somebody is fibbing
3:28 pm
about one of the greatest scandals of this era, the cause of the impeachment of the first elected first-term president in american history. as the senate prepares to hold trump on trial for all of this among other issues in ukraine, it is key to understanding the president eat potential defense, and oan, viewers are quite familiar with this 2018 video showing joe biden detailing how the obama administration pressured ukraine to remove a prosecutor as a u.s. priority. now, giuliani views this as a quote confession to one of the things that trump has stood accused of, seeking a bribe. >> january 2018 confession of joe biden in which joe biden laid out in about 2 1/2 minutes, a total definition, and a total confession to the crime of bribery. i don't think i have seen as tight, and concise and clear a confession, worse than that, i
3:29 pm
saw a confession with proof of guilty knowledge. >> proof. well, giuliani saw a confession of biden seeking a personal benefit, bloomberg journalists reported actually, the request was a broader obama administration policy emanating from u.s. diplomats, not hatched by biden, while other reports fact checked the claim that the company linked to hunter biden was under investigation at the time which gives context to biden's story. >> i said i'm telling you, you're not getting a billion dollars. i said you're not get a billion. i'm going to be leaving here, and it was what, six hours, i'm leaving in six hours, if the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. well, son of a [ bleep ] got fired and put in place someone who was solid at the time. >> now, depending on what you know and what you bring to this and how it's presented, people might see something different when that biden tape plays, prepare to see that tape a lot more, by the way. it is worth noting that other
3:30 pm
parts of giuliani's ukraine trip don't seem to amount to much. at one point, talks up the idea and giuliani is ending the ukrainian absence to meet in person, with another ukrainian caught up on the trip, and it's not clear what everyone is supposed to glean from the advertised reunion. >> now, the prospect of meeting shokin, and witnesses face-to-face, we landed in kiev and america's mayor stepped foot in ukraine for the first time in two years. >> we know from this photo, the anchor posted online, this seemed to go down in ukraine on december 5th, which amazingly is the very day donald trump's ukraine plot formally boom rang on him, with everything giuliani was doing, turning into a formal march towards impeachment. >> the facts of the ukraine
3:31 pm
situation just changed everything. ukraine was the vehicle of the president's action. sadly, but with confidence and humility, with allegiance to our founders, and a heart full of love for america, today i am asking our chairman to proceed with articles of impeachment. >> and that's where this story gets much broader that which particular media outlet rudy giuliani is talking to and whether he's in ukraine to make tv specials or make money or make, i don't know, strategic contributions to donald trump's reelection. because one thing that people who support and oppose impeachment can all see is rudy giuliani's plot to hurt biden backfired and hurt trump. his client. and this is really an ancient story line, a seemingly intricate plot backfires on its own master mind. so ancient, it's a verse in
3:32 pm
proverbs, and you might also remember it from bob marley's version, whosoever dig a pit shall fall in it. and maybe that's why even some of trump's most hard core defenders have become worried giuliani could fall in his own pit. >> i think it's a little weird that rudy giuliani is over in the ukraine right now, and i'm not here to defend rudy giuliani. you know, there's apparently an investigation going on. >> if you're going to go on national television and tell the country that you found evidence of a cover up, then i hope you know what you're talking about. it's just not good for the country to make these accusations on cable television without them being tested. >> so if lindsey graham, a well known trump defender, who is one of the senators that will determine the president's fate in this impeachment trial is doubting giuliani's approach of accusations on tv without testing them as he put it, then even looking past the senate trial, senator graham chairs a powerful committee, he has
3:33 pm
subpoena power, he has put some heat on giuliani by suggesting he's invited to put up or go away. >> i'm going to have an open invitation to rudy giuliani to come to the senate judiciary committee and tell us what you found, and if he comes, you got to be willing to ask questions about your conduct. >> his conduct. questions would surely be asked in that form, and how will they be answered? well, sometimes whosoever dig a pit keeps on digging. >> i would testify. i would do demonstrations. i'd give lectures, i'd give summations. >> hey, jerks, it means the same thing. >> we have the transcript of the call. >> these are the elements of the crime of bribery. >> why am i doing it, laura, can't you figure it out, i'm his defense lawyer. >> ukrainian collusion. ukrainian corruption. >> i will compliment myself because i do a pretty good job
3:34 pm
for him a pretty good job for hi . alad. one of seven delicious entrées - like new hawaiian-style garlic shrimp. and, get a sweet dessert. three courses. one amazing price. so come in today. instead of using aloe, or baby wipes, or powders, try the cooling, soothing relief or preparation h, because your derriere deserves expert care. preparation h. get comfortable with it.
3:35 pm
saturpain happens. aleve it. aleve is proven stronger and longer on pain than tylenol. when pain happens, aleve it. all day strong. at philof cream cheese.w what makes the perfect schmear you need only the freshest milk and cream. that one! and the world's best, and possibly only, schmelier. philadelphia. schmear perfection.
3:36 pm
3:37 pm
speaker pelosi shading president trump as quote nervous and falling apart as he faces this looming trial. trump himself admitted that impeachment is eating away at him. it's influenced his decisions, and also informed his iran choices reportedly, because he was under pressure to deal with that company by hawkish republican senators that he considered quote important in the coming impeachment trial. let's get into all of it with our state of mind series, friend of the beat and coauthor of the art of the deal, tony schwartz, author of "the way we're working isn't working," good to see you, sir. >> good to see you. >> you know him, you work with him. how is this affecting him? >> i think it's a progressive process. i think the humiliation that he associates already with having been impeached is incredibly preoccupying to him, and
3:38 pm
dominates his consciousness for the vast majority of every waking day. >> conpartmentalization, can be good up to a point, does he have that skill? >> zero. zero. >> then that would mean that this would be an impeachment season for him that he would not enjoy. >> absolutely. when you think back to clinton and the way he sort of carved out governing while he was being impeached, nothing could be more different than trump's way of dealing with this, which is he does in a sense compartmentalize -- that's a hard word -- he does compartmentalize. >> he'll make a recommendation for saying it, if you compartmentalize the siyllables it helps. >> i understand that. it's a meta reference. >> so trump does compartmentalize. he does, only in the sense that
3:39 pm
he can't think about anything else but this. it's all about his own. >> we know. >> it's all about his own self-esteem. >> so the serious part of this, the reporting we just mentioned, and it seems we're going to get even more about this. u.s. foreign policy affected by his domestic pressure. when you see that reporting, is that concerning, should that scare people, even if in this case, many breathing are sigh of relief of deescalation. >> i think, you know, that you have a rhetorical answer to that one, which is yes, of course it should be concerning. the narrower his funnel gets, the thing is that trump is dominated by emotions, and what he's feeling is what's causing him to make choices, not anything having to do because he's incapable of it, of reflection. but you know, the real issue here is, you know, not in my
3:40 pm
mind, the impeachment and the upcoming senate trial but of course the election. because he's not going to be convicted in the senate. we know that. barring some unbelievable event that happens. but it really struck me, i had a drink today with gary casperov, who was talking about the notion that this election and democrats need to understand this, is indeed about 300,000 people. there are really 300,000 people in eight or fewer states who will determine this election. and to pay attention much beyond those people, i mean, the others have to come out and vote, but the two extremes are going to come out, and so there's that little vote, and how do you actually appeal to them. >> my last one, lightning round, lawyers always tell defendants
3:41 pm
to be quiet during the trial. will donald trump keep his silence during this senate trial? >> well, you know he has remarkable powers of self-regulation, and i would expect that he will do whatever he is told in every moment, no, he will not. he will continue to say whatever impulsively he feels compelled to say in every moment until this is through. >> there are people who say tony schwartz's humor is as dry as a textbook, and i like it that way. >> well, the last time this came up you said to me, i'm the kind of guy who brings homework to a party. so. >> and you have been thinking about it ever since. >> i have been thinking about it. >> you had a colloquy with peggy noo nan and weeks later she went to your side. great to see you, and we'll see how the president's trial proceeds. donald trump's team out with a new explanation for this
3:42 pm
iranian air strike, and there's a real problem with it that matters, when we return. matters, when we return. keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. thenot actors, people, who've got their eczema under control. with less eczema, you can show more skin. so roll up those sleeves. and help heal your skin from within with dupixent. dupixent is the first treatment of its kind that continuously treats moderate-to-severe eczema, or atopic dermatitis, even between flare ups. dupixent is a biologic, and not a cream or steroid. many people taking dupixent saw clear or almost clear skin. and, had significantly less itch. that's a difference you can feel. don't use if you're allergic to dupixent. serious allergic reactions can occur, including anaphylaxis, which is severe. tell your doctor about
3:43 pm
new or worsening eye problems, such as eye pain or vision changes, or a parasitic infection. if you take asthma medicines, don't change or stop them without talking to your doctor. so help heal your skin from within, and talk to your eczema specialist about dupixent. ♪ do you recall, not long ago ♪ we would walk on the sidewalk ♪ ♪ all around the wind blows ♪ we would only hold on to let go ♪ ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we need someone to lean on ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we needed somebody to lean on ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ all we need is someone to lean on ♪ fidelity now has zero commissions for online u.s. equity trades and etfs. and fidelity also offers zero account fees for brokerage accounts, plus zero minimums to open an account.
3:44 pm
and only fidelity offers four zero expense ratio index funds directly to investors. with all of those zeros, there are zero reasons to invest anywhere else. fidelity. ♪ so maybe i'll win ♪ saved by zero doprevagen is the number oneild mempharmacist-recommendeding? memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life.
3:45 pm
by consolidating your credit card debt into one monthly payment. and get your interest rate right so you can save big. get a no-fee personal loan up to $100k. get a no-fee personal loan saturpain happens. aleve it. aleve is proven stronger and longer on pain than tylenol. when pain happens, aleve it. all day strong.
3:46 pm
today, president trump unveiled a new supposed rational for the air strike killing an iranian general. >> don't the american people have a right to know what specifically was targeted without revealing methods is sources? >> well, i don't think so, but we will tell you that probably it was going to be the embassy in baghdad.
3:47 pm
>> a large scale attacks planned for other embassies and if those were planned, why can't we reveal that to the american people? wouldn't that help your case? >> i can reveal that i believe it would have been four embassies. >> he believes. this is new supposed information, and lawmakers are already saying it was not included in that controversial briefing on capitol hill, meaning donald trump's allegedly now telling fox news days later details his administration wouldn't brief members of congress who of course are coequal branch that vote on war, quite different from what mike pompeo also said just last night. >> there is no doubt that there were a series of imminent attacks that were being plotted by qassem soleimani, we don't know precisely when and we don't know precisely where, it was real. >> president trump said soleimani wanted to blow up the embassy, is that accurate? >> well, he didn't confirm it. there are a lot of unanswered questions, we will stay on this story. when we come back, a very
3:48 pm
special fall back friday with our own chuck rosenberg, and dj stretch. stay with us. j stretch. stay with us rtburn, marie could only imagine enjoying freshly squeezed orange juice. now no fruit is forbidden. nexium 24hr stops acid before it starts for all-day, all-night protection. can you imagine 24 hours without heartburn?
3:49 pm
for all-day, little things can be a big deal. psoriasis, that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with... increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you.
3:50 pm
3:51 pm
a former army medic, made of the we maflexibility to handle members like kate. whatever monday has in store and tackle four things at once. so when her car got hit, she didn't worry. she simply filed a claim on her usaa app and said... i got this. usaa insurance is made the way kate needs it - easy. she can even pick her payment plan so it's easy on her budget and her life. usaa. what you're made of, we're made for. usaa (groans) hmph... (food grunting menacingly) when the food you love doesn't love you back, stay smooth and fight heartburn fast with tums smoothies.
3:52 pm
♪ tum tum-tum tum tums what a week. it is friday on "the beat." it is time to fall back. i am joined by our very special friends at the beat, a chuck rosenberg sandwich of sorts. he is in the middle of two hip hop radio legends, stretch armstrong and bobbito garcia. their radio show famously broke some of hip hop's iconic artists, people you know like jay-z, eminem, nas, wu-tang klan and are producing their first album, no requests. djs don't like requests. if you wanted to do requests, don't book a dj. it features beats and samples from some of their legendary days. and for his first fallback friday ever, msnbc contributor chuck rosenberg, he served in many senior posts in the justice department and multiple
3:53 pm
administrations, former chief of staff to fbi director james comey and former acting dea chief. and you can listen to him on our own msnbc weekly podcast, "the oath with chuck rosenberg." check it out. thanks for doing this, all of you. >> thanks for having us. >> i love it. it's great. you guys look good together. >> thank you. >> stretch, who needs to fall back? >> mark zuckerberg and facebook need to fall back. mark, not just his haircut is tragic, not just because he's meeting privately with trump off the record, but because facebook has declined to implement any real changes in terms of the lies and false narratives put forth in the ads that they're selling. >> and it's a reason that facebook gets a lot of heat. there are real protections, though. you're allowed to lie, most of the time, in american law. >> right, the first amendment protects the truth and it protects lies. you publish what you want, as long as you're not, you know, slandering someone else or
3:54 pm
inciting a riot, sure, absolutely. it's a tough line to draw. >> sure. bobbito, what's your facebook page like? >> my facebook page? i mean, i'm not too active on it, but -- i thought you were going to ask my fallback. you threw me off. >> okay, you want to move on? who needs to fall back, bobbito? >> we've been traveling, promoting this album and crossing path with some wonderful people, restaurant owners, uber drivers, and they're all playing music off of streaming services, which is wonderful. >> sure. >> it's the philosophy of it democratizes the ability for artists to reach audiences, but what's happening is that the payment for the artists is ridiculously unfair. for example,stero from canada, she had a song reach 4 million streams and over seven years, she's received roughly like
3:55 pm
$3,000 and change for -- i mean, can you imagine, having 4 million listens. >> which in the old day, we would call that quadruple platinum. >> yeah, for sure. >> and yet for her, not enough to cover the cost of making the music. >> you can't even make a living. >> i encourage people, if you love artist and love a genera or music, to think about purchasing the music, whether it's a download or a vinyl. >> and it's a great point you make, and it's broader than music. stretch, this is what a lot of tech companies have excelled at, which is getting people to share their pictures, their lives, their work, their data and they make a lot of money off of it. it's artists and people. >> and, you know, we all thought that a streaming service would be the wonderful demock ck r den
3:56 pm
of music and for ooflt waa lot it was, but the major labels have found a way to lock it down. and for those who have ownership in these companies, a lot of the major labels have their fingers up in these labels and are making tons of money on the backs of artists. >> and bobbito, wasn't it jay-z who said, forget a billion streams, i've got $1 billion. >> it was. >> yes used to battle bootlegging in the '80s and '90s with a lot of hip hop artists who might have gone gold or platinum or beyond that. and i almost feel like the streaming services -- look, i'm not against them. i think they do a great job of exposing some independent artists, but ultimately, there's got to be a better structure and if artists speak out and the audiences are aware that they can support their favorite artist in alternative ways, then it needs to be shared. >> i will say, we're lucky to have someone who's so thoughtful about the law here, chuck,
3:57 pm
because the law hasn't really caught up with what's happening. and the early laws on the internet made it really fluid if you want to get into the digital millennium copyright act. i know you do. i know you do. it allows for this type of third party protection. share, share, share. but do you think there are ways the law has fallen behind? >> absolutely. we see this in lots of places. certainly here, these gentlemen are absolutely right. but it's true almost everywhere, when we talk about law enforcement intercepts. the thing we use in law enforcement was essentially written in the mid-1980s. fortunately, technology hasn't really changed since 1986, so we're fine. but -- >> he's funny. >> eh, not that funny. what i do realize sitting between these two gentlemen is what an awkward stiff i am. that's become apparent. but the law has to catch up. and we need congress to do some really hard work. >> and step it pup. >> get us there. >> stretch, i will say, he's a
3:58 pm
dj, but he also just exudes a kind of a timeless cool. so you could feel good about you know, your suit, and you sit next to stretch and you're like, man, i'm overdressed. we all feel that way sometimes. i got to get -- chuck, i get to get your fallback. what's on your fallback list? >> rudy giuliani. i have two reactions. everything that comes out of his mouth seems to be wrong kroe corrosive or false. and he either knows that, which is incredibly pathetic, or he doesn't know that, which is incredibly pathetic. i was predisposed against the man. i thought after 9/11, he did an extraordinary job as mayor of this great city to step up and lead, but what i see now is heartbreaking. >> bobbito, a lot of people in new york say they have known giuliani for a long time to be not always on the level. >> well, this city suffered greatly under his leadership and
3:59 pm
music, cultural, for example, cabaret license laws were stiffened, so it was difficult to dance in new york while he was in office. >> it almost sounds like the cartoon villain that's against dancing. >> it's ridiculous. we would be dj'ing in bars and venues and the enforcement would show up and shut down a party. people were just enjoying music. and again, these laws for cabarets were structured in the 1920s and 1930s against the home renaissance. >> before we go, why is it called "no requests"? you guys really don't like no requests? >> our album is entitled "no requests," because we contributed to the '90s era and the lyrics you've memorized. but where we are now as djs and music producers is a little bit, it's just expanded. and so people would expect us to create a rap album, but what
4:00 pm
we've created is a very textured and nuanced album that incorporates latin, jazz, world, samba, soul, funk, rock. >> i love it. that's why we put it out. i've got to get on to "hardball." so good to have all of you together. thank you very much. hope you have a great weekend. and don't go anywhere. "hardball" starts right now. >> the assassination and the alibis. let's play "hardball." good evening. i'm chris matthews in washington. we have a big show tonight with some big stories. on iran, president trump has yet another explanation for taking the u.s. to the brink of war. on impeachment, speaker pelosi made a major decision about exactly when she's


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on