Skip to main content

tv   The Rachel Maddow Show  MSNBC  April 26, 2022 6:00pm-7:00pm PDT

6:00 pm
okay with government as long as they control it. the trick was, when this election, and particular, turns on a lot of minority voters and the right states handing the election over to joe biden not donald trump. and will people think now is like, we see this massive waste of expression. there's always waves of voter suppression the lead into the 2016 election. that was the first election 50 years where we didn't have full voting rights act. it was a massive wave. when they realize, however is that it wasn't enough. so they went back to the drawing board, and he became even more vicious in the way that they wanted to suppress peoples votes. the problem is not institutions, and it's all big governments is, the promise who do they believe is controlling government, and whether or not the people who they want to control it are in control of the government in the united states. >> james polk, and charles blow, thank you both.
6:01 pm
that is all in on this tuesday night, evening rachel. good evening chris, thank you my friend, much appreciated. thanks very much for joining us tonight, it's sort of feels like the news is about the fate of democracy, but it is split screen news. on one side of the screen we've got the world stage, where the hole leader of the free world thing felt like less of a mantra, less of a gauzy concept, and more like a nuts and bolts job description for the u.s. government. today, the u.s. defense secretary lloyd austin convene him's meeting of dozens, literally dozens of countries, from all around the world in support of ukraine. >> we all start today from a position of moral clarity. russia is waging a war of choice to indulge the ambitions of one man. ukraine is fighting a war of
6:02 pm
necessity, to defend its democracy, its sovereignty, and its citizens. but the stakes are reach beyond ukraine, and even beyond europe. russia's invasion is baseless, reckless, and lawless. it is an affront to the rules based international order, it is a challenge to free people everywhere. as we see this morning, nations of good world will from around the world stand united in our resolve to support ukraine. my trip to kyiv, rainforest my admiration for the way that the ukrainian armed forces are deploying these capabilities. ukraine clearly believes that it can win, and so does everyone here. >> ukraine clearly believes they can win, so does everyone here. that was defense secretary lloyd austin, speaking today in
6:03 pm
germany, i think the most important thing about what he said there, is that when he said so does everyone here, the everyone that he is talking about is a really big everyone. he and secretary of state anthony blinken convened this meeting today -- this wasn't just a nato meeting, it wasn't even just a meeting of the u.s. and our traditional allies, this was dozens of countries. from kenya to japan, tunisia, iceland. south korea, new zealand and yes of course, now, basically all of europe and all of nato, and all of our critical allies. but this was like 40 countries. plus, some that didn't even put their name on the list, domestic news sources in israel, for example, report today that the israeli government attended this meeting as well, even though israel didn't put its name on the list of participants. local reporting suggests that there may have been more than a
6:04 pm
few other countries, including a special middle eastern countries who did the same thing as well, because they wanted to and will participate in militarily supporting ukraine, even if they don't want to write their name down about it officially, because they don't want to officially have to talk about it yet. it's a remarkable thing. this is a very, very large coalition. a very large far flung coalition can beat by the united states, in support of ukraine. the biden administration has pulled together remarkable list of countries, that are going to hold these meetings in a recurring way. they're gonna do these meetings every month, while ukraine needs as much international support. how did they do that? >> do you remember in 2017, when trump shove that guy at that conference, remember that? that was at a nato conference, i think it was in belgium, and this little country called montenegro, which is 600,000
6:05 pm
people in the whole country, they've spent nine years trying to join nato. putin didn't want them to join. putin tried to organize a violent coup in montenegro to stop it. russia allegedly plotted the assassination of the country's prime minister to stop it. montenegro went ahead with it anyway, they join nato. this was their first nato meeting. trump came up behind their prime minister, and shoved him. and then stood right in front of him. the guy reacted, tried to laugh it off, make some contact with trump, trump wouldn't even look at him, just shoved him and walk past him. wouldn't look at him, pretending like he wasn't there. that was how trump treated the newest member of nato, right after he was elected in the spring of 2017. putin didn't like that guy, he didn't want him to join nato. trump just gives him a shove. yeah, i'm gonna go tell him here and say, not every u.s. president could've done the same job today.
6:06 pm
-- i'm not sure we would've seen a convening at the free world like this today, under the former guy. i'm just gonna take a wild guess, but the biden administration has done it. you see the u.s. and ukraine flies next to each other there. tomorrow, in eastern ukraine, putin is going to run one of his fake sham votes in the city of kherson, so you could use the supposed results of that vote to provide some pseudo-legal window dressing to justify russia taking over that part of ukraine as well. putin, you might remember, this is a central part of his playbook. he did a version of the same thing in the nation of georgia, when he invaded that country in 2008. he's done it already in ukraine, when he invaded ukraine previously in 2014 to justify taking parts of ukraine for russia. now he's doing it again in
6:07 pm
kherson. that is supposedly going to be tomorrow. that may also be what he tries in the next country he appears to have designs on, just of the southwest of ukraine, in the small nation of moldova. russia's got 1500 russian troops stash there already, in a port of moldova that he is claiming dominion, over just susie's kind of dominion over specific parts of ukraine, and still specific parts of the nation of georgia. but even as he does that, the rest of the world's really linking arms here in a remarkable way. germany is sending heavy weapons to ukraine for the first time since germany's very particular role in world war ii, the world has not looked to germany to do anything like this, and germany has not wanted to do it. but in this war, against this kind of aggressor, now they say they want to pull their weight as the biggest economy in europe, and as part of this unified international effort to give ukraine what it needs to actually win this war.
6:08 pm
finland and sweden had previously wanted to stay militarily independent and out of nato, as we've been covering here on the show, putin's invasion of ukraine has changed that sentiment radically on both of those questions. both countries seem inclined to request nato membership, sometime soon. what is newly emerging as their strategy is that finland and sweden may seek to do this together. they may make a simultaneous request of nato, and it may happen very soon, as soon as next month. today, in washington, amid all that sort of unity, all those developments in the world today, there was a collective spit take in washington when republican u.s. senator rand paul told a senate hearing on ukraine today that russia only seems to be in the habit of invading countries that were part of the former soviet union. he implied, you know, why should anyone care about that? a collective spit take as senator rand paul made that
6:09 pm
argument today, that we shouldn't care about russia invading ukraine, we should let them do what they want. because, after all, they were part of the soviet union, so russia can't invade anyone they want, as long as they think they have legitimate designs on any other sovereign country. you know, back in 2017, when trump was shoving the prime minister for montenegro, right after montenegro got into nato, you might remember that it was senator rand paul who tried to block a vote on the u.s. okay montenegro joining nato. john mccain got off on the floor of the senate at the time and said, quote, that senator from kentucky is now working for vladimir putin. now today, five years later, that same senator from kentucky is demanding from the u.s. secretary of state why it is that we should stop putin from invading any number of countries. since, after all, they're all pretty much has to play with, and a. the u.s. is sort of leading the
6:10 pm
free world on the international stage, and at home, leading members of the republican party are like, what is so good about the free world? it's kind of a split screen night in the news, in terms of the faith of the democracy. on the world stage we have secretary of defense lloyd's austin said it was a moral clarity helping ukraine defend itself as a democracy that has been invaded. this huge, and surprising, a diverse number of countries around the world, now lining up alongside the united states to help them defend their democracy. but, here at home, the other side of the split screen, today was another day when we learned how close to toast our own democracy has been. thanks to efforts on the right, to try to use force to overwhelm our democratic process in this past year. in recent days, we learned that republican utah senator mike lee participated avidly in the illegal scheme to try to get
6:11 pm
states that were won by joe biden to never let the less sand fake electors to congress, so they would be counted for trump instead of biden in the electoral college. mike lee had previously denied participating in such a scheme, he said he was shocked, shocked when he heard about it, thought it was crazy. we now know he was a promoting it aggressively to the white house, and he was trying to pull it off. he was personally contacting officials in multiple states that had been won by biden, to see if there is any way to get their votes counted as if they had been cast for trump instead. we have learned, as well, hot on the heels of those revelations, to the white house chief of staff mark meadows, was advised directly by the white house counsel's office, but that scheme was illegal. that scheme involving states one by biden, nevertheless having their votes counted for trump? he was told in no uncertain terms, that that was illegal. he was reportedly told that multiple times by the white house counsel's office, and
6:12 pm
even though he was informed by the white house counsel's office said that that such a scheme was illegal, he pursued it anyway. we have since learned he wasn't alone mark meadows's aide cassidy hutchison has testified to the january six investigation, the theory republican members of congress were present. scott perry of pennsylvania, republican congressman matt gates of florida, and republican congressman louis gohmert of texas. perry, gates, and gohmert were all present when white house lawyers told meadows and them, that this scheme involving -- that scheme was illegal. mr. meadows kept trying for it even though they had all been told it was against the law. cnn reports today that one of those members, scott perry, texted white house chief of staff mark meadows just a few days at the election, that the white house needed to have the nsa, the national security administration, immediately sees communications relate to the voting machines. he that same day text of the
6:13 pm
white house that the cia was in on some sort of anti trump plot, and the white house needed to act against the cia as well. on the heels of those revelations, tonight, new york times reporters jonathan martin and alexander burns have released more audio from the immediate aftermath of the january 6th attack. their forthcoming book, which is released on tuesday of next week, is apparently going to be accompanied by an absolute trove of incredibly disturbing audio tapes, autio recordings of republicans speaking among themselves in the immediate aftermath of the january 6th attack, including this newly-released discussion, of how dangerous top republicans believed it was four pro trump republican members of congress, to keep talking in violent terms. the violent and incendiary terms, about even other members of congress, the way they were in the wake of january 6th. >> okay, the other thing i want to bring up, and i'm making
6:14 pm
some phone calls, i just got something sent now about newsmax and gaetz, calling peoples names out, saying it's anti trump, and this kind of atmosphere. this is serious stuff people are doing, that has to stop. >> -- louis's comments, to a lot of members have said some real concerning things -- >> do they think to? >> mill was at the rally and they were kicking butt and taking names thing at the trump rally. >> gaetz said [inaudible] specifically, i just saw that on twitter. >> i'm calling gaetz, and explaining to him, i don't know what i'm gonna say, but i'm gonna have people call him.
6:15 pm
basic i'm gonna get another one from the fbi tomorrow, this is serious, we need to cut this out. it's potentially illegal when he was doing. >> he's putting people in jeopardy. we saw what people were doing in the capital. >> we saw what people would do in the capital, they came prepared with rope, with everything else. just before that, we heard louisiana republican congressman steve scalise saying, about matt gaetz, yeah, that's potentially illegal when he was doing. mccarthy said, well he's putting people in jeopardy, doesn't need to be doing, this he saw what people did in the capital, people came prepared with rope and everything else. that audio released by the new york times, that's the
6:16 pm
republican leadership in the house of representatives talking about their own members. how they are incendiary, calls to violence, even against other members of congress were potentially illegal, very concerning, threatening to the point of mr. mccarthy referencing the fbi briefings he was getting, in that same discussion. in addition to that recording tonight, released by the new york times. we've now also got the context for wet nicholas burns and jonathan martin have reported here on this show last week, when they described kevin mccarthy expressing exasperations the social media companies, the twitter was not cutting off the accounts of more republicans, beyond just trump. as republicans continue to use social media platforms like twitter to call for violence, or to otherwise say things online that could incite. here is that tape. >> what did mora say down at that rally, though.
6:17 pm
>> it's the kicking butt and taking names thing is the one i'm seeing the most from people. i didn't watch the speech, that's a number of members said that to me, the use that term. and louise said -- didn't you say something a couple of days out that -- >> something like that, yes. it's incendiary. >> i'm, you've got maxine waters and all that stuff too. i know the dems are in a very strong position right now, we've got to start paying attention. >> brooks apparently said, today's the day american patriots start taking down names, and kicking bleep. which is i think a step further than the rhetorical take.
6:18 pm
>> you think the president deserves to be impeached? [inaudible] >> all right, someone give me the intro of what they said. >> have either them apologized for it? >> i have not seen that anywhere. bob >> and there is an issue with alabama. he was saying some things today that we should look, at honestly. >> what did berry say today? >> all right, so he deleted the personal twitter account, but jamie agrees with the atlanta journal -- about 22 hours ago, while we have more arrests for stealing a podium on january six, then steal an election on november 3rd, atlanta, philadelphia, and detroit, i recommend you start.
6:19 pm
here is video evidence of these crimes as well, hashtag election. also made this tweet on the saturday night, as a capitol police officer shot and killed a woman, and try to get lobby, and who's tweeted at marjorie greene. i understand it was a a black police officer, that shot a white female veteran, but that doesn't fit the narrative. >> while. oh man. we have to confront with this. >> can't they take their twitter accounts away too? it weighs a black police officer who shot the white female, says congressman barry more, i gasp then follows on the call, and you hear kevin mccarthy say can't they take their twitter work accounts away to? you heard earlier in the tape
6:20 pm
of that conversation, this is a tape that was reportedly made on january 10th, so four days after the attack on the capitol. kevin mccarthy appearing to say about congressman moe brooks, you think the president deserves to be impeached for his comments? ahead of the attack on the capital, then describing what congressman moe brooks had said at the same rally where the president spoke before the attack. quote, that's something that goes further than what the president says. so they're talking about no brooks be even more culpable than president trump, and president trump deserving impeachment for what he had said. and then this quote from another alabama congressman barry moore, talking about the fact that it was a black police officer who shot a white female. gasp, can't they take their twitter accounts away? after those recordings were published tonight, further illustrating how keenly
6:21 pm
republicans and leadership are aware, the with their own members were doing was going to cause violence. tonight, the chairman of the january 6th investigation, democratic congressman benny thompson told reporters that, yes, they really would like to talk to some members of congress for their investigation. yes, in particular, they'd really like to talk to kevin mccarthy. listen. >> they want to hear from kevin mccarthy? >> yes, we've invited him to come earlier before the latest revelation that was reported on tapes. so, in all probability, he will be issued another invitation to come just like some other members. >> when will that happen? >> soon. >> this week? >> soon. >> mccarthy in the other two republicans, there is some new members and that was well.
6:22 pm
>> for sure, leader mccarthy, will make a decision on any others before the week is out. >> if he doesn't respond to that invitation, second innovation, which you subpoena him at that point? >> well, that'll be a consideration for the committee to decide. >> that was the chair of the january 6th investigation, congressman benny thompson saying that the committee will be issuing another invitation to the republican house leader kevin mccarthy for him to come speak with him. you'll recall that the investigation has issued a number of request, voluntary requests for interviews with republican members of congress, who appear to be directly implicated in the effort to overthrow the government and install trump in a second term by force. no republican members of congress have agreed to do that including kevin mccarthy after areas previously invited. they now say they will invite him a second time, following all these recent revelations about his reaction to the january six events. you just heard him say their
6:23 pm
tonight that they will make a decision when it comes to it. if you rejects the second invitation to testify, and have to decide whether or not he's gonna get a subpoena instead. joining us now is reporter nicholas moo, who's one of the reporters in that scrum listening to remarks from chairman thompson tonight. nice to have you here. >> thanks so much, rachel with. >> so i feel like today has been a day of, sort of, a snow balling development in terms of january six, particularly related to republican members of congress. let me ask you the way described, that if they got anything wrong, or there's anything important in terms of today's developments that you think of messed. >> that's exactly right, we've seen the focus turned back on house republicans here. this is gonna be have to be something that the committee has to make some big decisions, anna what exactly they're gonna do if they actually want to hear from any of these members
6:24 pm
of. congress. >> in terms of the likelihood of getting to hear from members of congress, we have previously seen requests, i think scott perry might have been the first, that these members should come in top one by one, all of these members have rejected those, voluntary requests. we haven't seen subpoenas to members of congress. last night congressman adam schiff, who's on the january six investigation, don't be that that would effectively blow up the house of representatives, to start subpoenaing members of congress. it seems like there's practical considerations well, the committee presumably wants to move fast and have the report out before the election in november, while they've still got the authority to convene this investigation, before the republicans likely take over. is the invest is there any expectation that this will just end up with a protected court battle, and might not force a court experience? >> yes, the problem with the subpoenas, is as the committee is talked about before, there
6:25 pm
could be these legal issues and enforcing one against a member of congress. well, it's not without precedent for a congressional panel to subpoena another member, we see the ethics committee do that in this investigation. something like this, there's a real possibility ends up in court, the thing, is is that the professional democrats can take other steps to enforce their interview requests. they can try to dock members pay, for example, that's the step they haven't taken yet. partly -- there's a concern that the issues on the other foot, when republicans take control and start their own investigations in the future that's going to be turned against them. >> let me ask, nicholas, about the specific revelations concerning house republican leader kevin mccarthy. certainly, these recent revelations, particularly the audiotape, particularly because he lied about the content that was then revealed on the audiotape. it's a political problem for
6:26 pm
him, intervales and to have lied about his behavior in the immediate aftermath of the seminal moment in his career. it is also made very angry some of the extremist pro trump members of congress, who he is expressing concerns about. including statements from people like matt gaetz, criticizing him politically for having seen himself in such up oppositional terms to he and other members of the time. is this materially changing the political landscape of kevin mccarthy's leadership in the republican party? if the republicans do well in the midterm elections, he's expected to be their contender for speaker. is this putting that in doubt? >> at the end of last week, it looked like kevin mccarthy's aspirations to be speaker were in at least some trouble. as revelations of this dribbled out, you did see criticism from influential members of former
6:27 pm
president trump's inner circle. steve bannon, for example, said -- he denied what was then found to be on tape. and you saw some of these congressman. gaetz publicly criticize the republican leader. this week, however, mccarthy and trump have talked, it looks like they've made up in some ways. and while last week, it looks like a lot of republicans were kind of in wait and see mode to see what mccarthy would say, with trump and say. mccarthy seems to have solidified in some ways is on standing here. my colleagues reported this evening that mccarthy held a leadership meeting and picked it over with his lieutenants, and they were all on view about what is happening, and they're trying to win a majority. it kind of remains to be seen how this is going to shake out. if republicans end up with a sizeable majority next year, mccarthy will probably have a very easy path to the speakership. however, if it's a narrow majority, and you still have a
6:28 pm
vocal pro trump faction that might vote against mccarthy then this could cause problems for him. >> nicholas wu covers congress for politico, thanks for your help with these developing stories tonight, it's great to have you here. >> thanks so much for having me. >> all right, it's a wise point that mr. wood was making there at the end, about the size of the republican majority. if they do in fact win a majority in the midterm elections. if it's a very narrow majority, then you are going to have entities like the far-right pro trump freedom caucus, playing a significant role, just as any faction it in a narrow minority complacent in a funeral in deciding who gets the leadership, and who will be blocked by block action in terms of keeping somebody out of the top spot. when you are thinking about that dynamic, i'll give you one thing to keep in mind, if the freedom caucus is going to play the pro trump spoiler role, in
6:29 pm
terms of who is going to leave the congress, who's going to lead the republican party if they get the majority. the leader at the freedom caucus of scott perry, right? he is in leadership of the freedom caucus, and he's also the one who has recently been implicated, specifically in trying to put a guy at the top of the justice department who had declared legal for the states to send fake electors to the electoral college. he's also specifically been implicated in recent days in the plan to try to get the mob to move from the ellipse physically to the capital as the votes were being counted. so, if he's going to play the powerbroker in who gets to lead the republican party. that is gonna be something. all right, much more to get to tonight, stay with us. tonight, stay with us. ays ♪ only two things are forever: love and liberty mutual customizing your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. (emu squawks) if anyone objects to this marriage, speak now or forever hold your peace.
6:30 pm
(emu squawks) (the crowd gasps) no, kevin, no! not today. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ way day, wayfair's biggest sale of only pay for what you need. the year is bigger than ever! for two days only, april 27th and 28th, get the lowest prices on thousands of items for your home. shop outdoor furniture up to 65% off... rugs up to 80% off... and lighting up to 65% off... plus, get bonus savings with a wayfair credit card and free shipping on everything! shop way day, our biggest sale of the year. happening april 27th and 28th at ♪ wayfair you've got just what i need ♪
6:31 pm
hi, i'm ron reagan, an unabashed atheist.
6:32 pm
and i'm alarmed, as you may be, by the intrusions of religion into our secular government. that's why i'm asking you to join the freedom from religion foundation, the nation's largest and most effective association of atheists and agnostics working to keep state and church separate, just like our founders intended. please join the freedom from religion foundation today. ron reagan, lifelong atheist, not afraid of burning in hell. so, the list is a little bit
6:33 pm
6:34 pm
daunting. this is the covid list of both facebook nickel names who have contracted covid just in the past few weeks. speaker of the house nancy pelosi, the assistance become the house congresswoman catherine clark. republican senator susan collins. democratic senator lauren fail warnock. merrick garland. president biden's sister val. secretary of agriculture. first lady joe biden's press secretary. vice presidents kamala harris communications director. congressman adam schiff. walking castro.
6:35 pm
peter defazio. new york city mayor eric adams. just today, senator ron wine. senator chris murphy of connecticut. it's a remarkable realest and this past few weeks. and this isn't even a complete list of the boldface will go names who does that positive for covid in just the past few weeks. well, as of today, looking at vice president kamala harris that expanding was. vice president does a positive for covid today. the positive test result partly came back just before she came back the local office to sit with the president. and the president daily brief. her office says that vice president harris has not been near the president in person for an extended period of time, recently. so president biden is not considered to be close contacts of hers for this infection. white house further announce that vice president harris would be working from her official residence while she isolates, according to cdc guidelines. she will be able to walk in the
6:36 pm
white house. perhaps, most importantly, with today, the white house said the president has not experienced any symptoms, not at all. they said they were asymptomatic when it comes to this infection. i mean, i should point, out of all the big names on the list we just mentioned, none of them reportedly experienced severe illness. none of them appears to have been hospitalized, even the real old ones who may have had some symptoms, but bad symptoms, none of them as far as we know. and, not coincidentally, all of them are vaccinated, fully vaccinated. in fact, the vice president just got her second booster just 25 days ago. as we know now, as our understanding of this virus and vaccines have evolved over time, we know that any vaccination schedule cannot 100% prevent you from getting infected. you can still get a positive test result, but, if you are fully vaccinated, your positive
6:37 pm
test result is much much much much much much more likely to be associated with only mild centers with no surveillance, and without having to go to the hospital. thank you vaccines. and we should know that this evidence about the efficacy of vaccines comes as the white house is just starting a new push to do more to protect us against the risk of severe illness in covid. today, the white house outlined plans to increase the usage of the anti viral pills developed by pfizer that's called acts moving. now, this is a drug take for five days. it reduces hospitalizations and deaths and people who are at high risk of possible evasion of this. it reduces the chance of those things by 90%. the thing, is you have to take this drug, got to take back covid early, within, hopefully, three days. or maybe five days at least of symptoms starting. the administration just purchased 20 million courses of the treatment but not enough americans are getting our
6:38 pm
system about expressing time, since you need to take early. we'll not administration is increasing the number of locations where people who need the drug can go and get it. they're trying to make sure all of those treatments get to the people who need, them rather than sitting on the shelf. and that, we learned, tonight includes people like the vice president, kamala harris. the white house has just said that she was prescribed paxlovid today. we don't know if that means that vice president harris had progressed from being asymptomatic this morning, and mitchell started to experience symptoms. it's possible that they decided to prescribe her paxlovid even while she was asymptomatic. we do not know. but we were told that, this morning, she was positive. now she is asymptomatic. we are told tonight that she was prescribed back sullivan. and, again, that is something -- it's not something that you take when you're sick, this is when you take it at the outset of symptoms. on top of, that white house is also pushing congress to pass a bill to fund more treatments like paxlovid, as well as more vaccines, and more boosters. and they're warning that if they don't pass this funding
6:39 pm
quickly, we can run out of all those tools to fight covid. but all this proceeding of base, we'll keep our eye out for more news from the white house about the private vice president's condition. we're always thinking about her family, watch the space. family, watch the space. family, watch the space. based on clinical data, i recommend salonpas. agreed... my patients like these patches because they work for up to 12 hours, even on moderate pain. salonpas. it's good medicine i'm gonna show you a video here
6:40 pm
6:41 pm
6:42 pm
6:43 pm
that sullivan hard to watch, so if you are not inclined to see something like that, if you're watching with kids, this is your fair warning. if you want to just walk away
6:44 pm
from mid. here it, is this is a security video from the san fernando courthouse in los angeles county. this video is obtained by the l.a. times. and it shows a man in handcuffs, we can see in the blue trousers they. his name is and so escalante. it starts with him punching in l.a. county sheriff's deputy and you see the marshall him to the ground. then, though, one of the deputies that wrestled him into the ground puts his knee on the prisoners had. and continues to kneel on has had for three solid minutes. which left that man on the ground arrive, thankfully, but we will beat up. and of those elements of that video that feel familiar to you, it's important to know the timing here. that incident took place last year on march 10th. much tenth 2021. it was two days after jury selection up started and the very highly publicized trial of derek chauvin.
6:45 pm
i minneapolis police officer convicted of murdering george floyd by kneeling on minutes on and on the neck of george floyd. it was a report of the l.a. times who published this video last month. along with the reporting, alleging that the county sheriff's department, and up to and including the sheriff himself, attempt at the cover of the incident, because they fear that negative light to this incident could shed on the department. the sheriff himself has maintained that he didn't know about this until months after it happens. he says he didn't cover anything up. he says they believe the deputy of duty immediately after we came out will that happened. well, yesterday, that same l.a. times reporter, helene, added to the story. reporting that an l.a. county sheriff's department commander had filed a new legal claim, contesting all of those denials from the sheriff. alleging specifically that the sheriff had a view of the video of the incident just five days
6:46 pm
after it occurred. not eight months later, which is what he claimed. the commander further alleges that sheriff villanueva said that the group with, quote, we do not need the bug media this time. so, the l.a. times publishes the disturbing video, the sheriff says i had no idea, we didn't cover that up, as soon as i found that about, it i took action. a commander on his own force says that is not true, you absolutely know about it. and you that covered up. that's where the story stood as of yesterday, where one today is absolutely bananas. because today, l.a. county sheriff villanueva convened a press conference to dispute all of this reporting. and what he did at this press conference, that is not causing a pressure on those headlines, that he got up at this press conference today in person, and you put up a big poster for everyone to see. the post had three large photos on it. one on the right is the l.a. times journalist who did this
6:47 pm
reporting. also, another photo is one of his political rivals for the elected position of l.a. county sheriff, and the third photo was the l.a. sheriff's department inspector general. who investigates things like this. the reason you put up the photo of those three is because, the chef announced today that all three of them are no subjects of a criminal investigation. e to how the l.a. times report, or at lean, got that security footage. they're all the subjects over criminal investigation nova whose office. he says they're all being investigated now for possible felonies like, conspiracy and burglary and unauthorized use of a database. this list of potential crimes. all while the l.a. times reporter, ellen, was in the front row covering the press conference for this paper. as the sheriff puts up her picture as a perpetrator who was offices going after. this decision by the sheriff today to announce a criminal investigation into this reporter certainly looks like
6:48 pm
retaliation. the executive editor of the l.a. times about the statement tonight saying the sheriff's attempt to criminalize news reporting saying it goes against well-established constitutional law, quoted, viciously -- in any proceeding or investigation rocked by authorities. and the story started off bad and los angeles, today took a very dark turn. more ahead, stay with us. more ahead, stay with us allergies don't have to be scary. spraying flonase daily stops your body from overreacting to allergens all season long. psst! psst! flonase all good. today, in something that feels
6:49 pm
6:50 pm
6:51 pm
6:52 pm
6:53 pm
like a bad plot line from some distant authoritarian country, a los angeles county sheriff convened a press conference to announce that he was opening a criminal investigation into a l.a. times reporter, who has been reporting on a scandal in his office. he put up a big picture of her at the press conference, as she sat there in the front row covering that press conference for the times. tonight, the reporters committee for freedom of the press is responding st.. the l.a. county sheriff's department announcement that it has launched a criminal investigation into a journalist because of her reporting, is appalling. this blatantly retaliatory comeback aimed at the reporter is beyond the pale, and violates the first amendment. publishing newsworthy information about an alleged law enforcement cover-up, that sought to block an investigation the use of excessive force, is constantly constitutionally protected activity, it's clearly in the public interest.
6:54 pm
we condemn the departments actions in the strongest terms, and incursion to immediately drop this purported investigation. joining us now is katie townsend, who's at the freedom of the press. thanks for being with us tonight, thank you. >> thanks for having me, rachel. >> so if she were to call the reporters committee's free legal hotline to ask for advice here, what advice would you give her in the circumstance? >> well, i think i would say, first off their's long-standing legal authority, including supreme court's landmark decision makes clear that a news organization can be held criminally liable for publishing information of public concern, it doesn't matter if the video issue that you played earlier, rachel, is confidential, it doesn't matter if it was leaked to the los angeles times. the constitution doesn't commit the criminal prosecution from receiving and publishing it.
6:55 pm
the sheriff's department should know that, and it shouldn't be threatening a criminal investigation of rhea retaliation for that constitutionally protected activity. >> well, threatening and retaliation of the key words there. my understanding, from the sort of political reputation of the sheriff here, who is, as i mentioned, running for reelection, is he might like this sort of lawless images crates about him, and sort of screw the first amendment, screw the press kind of image of this creates of him but i wonder if, he is it is getting some unexpected blow back. i did hope and expect that the l.a. times is pushing back with all its got here. is the sheriff may be biting off more than he can chew here in terms of what part of the constitution is messing here, by doing this. >> rachel, i'd like to think that this sort of conduct would receive widespread condemnation, not just from members of the press, which we've seen, but just from members of the public -- the reporter that was targeted here at the threat of criminal
6:56 pm
investigation, reported on an alleged cover-up on a video incident where the deputy kneeled on the head of a handcuffed inmate for approximately three minutes the public needs that kind of reporting, to hold them accountable, the public should be a rage by the sheriff's department's attempts to silence that reporting. >> katie townsend's deputy executive director and legal director at the reporters committee for freedom of the press, which is an absolutely invaluable org organization in our democracy, miss townsend, thank you so much for being with us tonight. keep us apprized on the story, it's pretty astonishing, thank you. >> thank you. >> we will be right back. will be right back at liberty butchemel— cut. liberty biberty— cut. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for whatchya... line? need. action. cut. you can't say that. [phone rings] sorry. is this where they're gonna put the statue of liberty? liberty...
6:57 pm
are we married to mutual? cut. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ ♪ we could walk forever ♪ ( ♪♪ ) ♪ walking on ♪ ♪ walking on the moon ♪ ♪ some ♪ ♪ may say ♪ ♪ i'm wishing my days away ♪ ♪ no way ♪ ♪ walking on the moon ♪ allergies don't have to be scary.
6:58 pm
spraying flonase daily stops your body from ♪ no way ♪ overreacting to allergens all season long. psst! psst! flonase all good.
6:59 pm
[♪♪] did you know you can address one of the root causes of aging by targeting all the cells in your body? try tru niagen. life as we know it cannot exist without nad. as we age, nad can decrease by as much as 50%. tru niagen is proven to increase nad, to support heart and muscle health, and energy production that starts in your cells. address one of the root causes of aging with tru niagen, researched by the world's top scientific institutions. as a business owner, your bottom line is always top of mind. so start saving by switching to the mobile service designed for small business: comcast business mobile. flexible data plans mean you can get unlimited data or pay by the gig. all on the most reliable 5g network. with no line activation fees or term contracts... saving you up to $500 a year. and it's only available
7:00 pm
to comcast business internet customers. so boost your bottom line by switching today. comcast business. powering possibilities.™ under district attorney gascón, i prosecuted car break-ins. all repeat offenders, often in organized crime rings. but when chesa boudin took office, he dissolved the unit and stopped me from collaborating with the police on my cases. now home and car break-ins are on the rise because repeat offenders know they can get away with it. chesa boudin is failing to do his job. there's a better way to keep san francisco safe. recall chesa boudin now. the rachel maddow show has once again burst its proverbial banks, and it is now passed time for the last word with lawrence o'donnell, good evening rachel, what's 30 seconds lawrence, i apologize. between us? wow come o