Skip to main content

tv   The Rachel Maddow Show  MSNBC  July 26, 2010 9:00pm-10:00pm EDT

9:00 pm
>> thbs contributor dave weigel, thanks for your insuit into that side of the world tonight. >> thank you. that will do it for this monday edition of "countdown." i'm lawrence o'donnell in for keith olbermann, who is on vacation. now to discuss how the gop's only interest is getting even i give you chris hayes, sitting in for rachel maddow tonight. good evening, chris. there is news about the political anilism. 2011 could make you pine for 1995. the bp oil disaster did nothing for the new energy bill, but president obama could do a whole lot with the few strokes of a pen. the rachel maddow show uses a prop in order to explain the total ridiculousness of fiscal conservatives favoring the bush tax cuts. the prop is a huge chocolate cake. if nothing else, stay for the cake. we begin tonight with what else, the largest leak of wartime
9:01 pm
documents in this country since the vietnam war. more than 90,000 u.s. government documents obtained and posted by the website wikileaks over the weekend. the last time there was a leak of this volume, it precipitated a full-on war between the "new york times" and the nixon white house. it was, of course, the leaking of the pentagon papers during the vietnam war by u.s. military analyst named daniel elsburg back in 1971. the pentagon papers was a touch stone that helped turn the public against vietnam war. the 90,000 plus documents posted by kwikileaks are different than the pentagon papers in that they're snap shots of the war over the last six years, as opposed a top-down study initiated in washington. the wikileaks documents are raw intelligence, threat analysis as seen through the eyes of the soldier fighting the war. as opposed an analytical view of the war from policymakers. in that sense wikileaks is no
9:02 pm
pentagon papers, but there is a glaring pair lil lel between the two that can't be ignored. these wikileaks documents have been notable in that they essentially confirm all of the major points of criticism of the afghanistan war effort. that elements of the pakistani government are, too varying degrees, in cahoots with the taliban. the local afghan government is loathed and corrupt. that our efforts at smiting the taliban often lead to horrific instances of civilian casualties, and the money spent on nation-building often end up lining the pockets of warlords and profiteers. they're all essentially substantiateed in these new documents. now, the significance of the pentagon papers was that they demonstrated that within the u.s. government there was an analysis of the vietnam war's feelings that precisely echoed exactly what the war's critics were saying on the outside. they were leaked at a team when the white house was attempting to ost are a size and marginalize the war's critics as just a bunch of flag-burning hippies. they helped transform the anti-war protesters critique
9:03 pm
with something with a tremendous amount of gravity. these documents threaten to do the same thing with the afghanistan war. they essentially validate and mainstream the concerns of the war's staunchest critics. >> it's clear that it will shape an understanding of what the past six years of war has been like and that the course of the war needs to change, the manner in which it needs to change. >> joining us now from london is deklan walsh. he is the correspondent for pakistan and afghanistan for "the guardian." thank you for joining us tonight. i know it's late in london so, i really appreciate it. >> no problem. my pleasure. >> i guess the first question is since you did have a jump-start on looking through these documents, what surprised you most, what kind of jumped out at you as you were reviewing them
9:04 pm
prior to today? >> the most striking thing was the profusion of reports that are about the interservice reports. there are 180 reports within this dossier which carry a range of allegations saying basically that pakistan has been manipulating the insurgency, has been supplying them with weapons, with suicide bombers, with money, and over the last six -- over the six-year period between 2004 and 2009, and this really, you know -- it's very difficult to stand up a lot of the allegation that is are made in these reports, which are, of course, ground level intelligence reports, but they do raise a lot of questions about what the role of pakistan is in this war. how this is going to play out between america and pakistan remains sob teen. i think, you know, this has been a very rocky relationship for several years now. i think both sides, to some degree, have learned to live with their differences, because
9:05 pm
the truth of the matter is that the u.s. and pakistan have different objectives in afghanistan, and those differing objectives do sometimes clash. >> i wonder how you would respond. there's a certain group of people in the u.s., particularly, who seem to be saying essentially there's nothing new contained in these documents. this is essentially old news, but that it confirms a set of critique that is have already existed. it is very similar to the contours of many of the arguments that were made about what's wrong with the u.s. involvement in afghanistan. do you think that's a fairly accurate picture, or do you think that misses it? >> i think that's probably a fairer picture. i mean, there are a number of, you know, important elements that have come out of this. there have been files that, for instance, have shown that the taliban have had a greater capacity to shoot down western aircraft to using surface-to-air missiles, and that's something we didn't know. for me really one of the most valuable things in this exercise is the very unvarnished, you
9:06 pm
know, gritty, on the ground picture of the fighting that you get. you know, in many of these reports, you very much get the sense of the soldiers on the ground grappling with very difficult situations. you know, they often have very tragic outcomes, unfortunately. there are a lot of reports in here about civilian casualties. something that we tend to know about in terms of statistics because these things often happen in remote areas where there's no reporting, and these -- and sort of dispatchers that you see here from the soldiers actually bring it to life and tell you about the small tragedies, you know, that make the chaos of the war in afghanistan and that also have a very significant impact on afghan perceptions of this war and why they think it's going wrong. >> deklan walsh, thank you for your time tonight. >> my pleasure. if you are the obama administration and you have just been informed of this massive leak of government documents, how do you respond? well, you respond, first, of course, by condemning the leak.
9:07 pm
that's what white houses do, but then by trying to minimize the important and ultimate impact of these documents. the way the obama administration has chose tony do that is to stress that these documents are totally outdated that, they're years old. the first response from the administration came from national security advisor jim jones. he released a statement that read, in part, "the documents posted by wikileaks reportedly cover a period of time from january 2004 to december 2009. on december 1st, 2009, president obama announced a new strategy with a substantial increase in resources for afghanistan, precisely because of the grave situation that had developed over several years." that sentiment that this is old news was echoed today we white house press secretary robert gibbs. >> in terms of broad revelations, this aren't any that we see. when you talk about the way the war is going in afghanistan, the documents purportedly cover from january -- i think january of
9:08 pm
2004 to december of 2009. when the president came into office in 2009, he in the first few months ordered an increase in the number of our troops. >> a little later in the day the state department made sure to hit on the same note. "these are in many cases documents that are several years old." ditto democratic chairman of the housed armed services committee saying, "it is critical we not use outdated reports to paint a picture of the cooperation of pakistan in our efforts in afghanistan. these leaked reports pre-date our new strategy in afghanistan." in the past 24 hours or so it's been a full frontal unified pr effort from those in power to try to downplay these documents, to say this is all in the past. this is why we decided to change strategy. everything is new now. these documents don't reflect the current reality on the ground. that's what the administration and the administration support nerz congress have tried to do. to say essentially these documents don't matter that much. the problem with that argument
9:09 pm
is evident in dispatches coming from the ground in afghanistan, not in 2004 or 2005 or 2006, but right now. earlier this month rachel traveled to afghanistan and laid out a number of on the ground challenges that exist there, challenges that are echoed in these year-old wikileak documents. for instance, like making sure u.s. money winds up in the right hands or making sure that local government officials and police aren't seen as feckless and corrupt. those are the challenges in 2010. not 2004. the question is how much does afghanistan right now exhibit all the structural problems that surfaced in these documents? joining us, independent journalist with big noise films rick rowley. he just returned from a six-week trip from afghanistan where he was embedded. thank you for your time today. >> it's great to be here. >> obviously, you have seen all the pushback from the white house, and i guess the first question is is it different? i mean, you have gone to afghanistan several times, i think, over a period of time. >> yes. >> are the main things that we see surfacing in the documents,
9:10 pm
are those really stories of the past, and everything is different now, or is there a lot of resonance? >> first of all, we need to look at how shocking that is to say that this is -- the fact that it's old news means it's irrelevant. these documents prove that the u.s. military has been whitewashing the war since the beginning. they have covered up civilian casualties. they have covered up successful insurgent attacks and downplayed their significance, and they have covered up the violent criminalality of the security forces that we've created that are preying on the civilian population and turning civilian population against us. you know, that also being said, the situation on the ground that i saw was an obama surge that had been completely derailed. the administration's line is that these documents are from bush's war. obama's war began 1st of december. this was supposed to be the poster child of the point of bakt for the new obama war, and it has proven to be what general mcchrystal called it in one of his more candid moments, a bleeding ulcer. there are two marine battalions there that have been pinned down
9:11 pm
for months. they're unable to bring security. we can't -- when i was embedded with the marines, we couldn't take roads with vehicles. we couldn't even walk on foot paths because of all of the ieds and roadside bombs. we walked through the middle of the fields, and once you got between one and three kilometers outside of the radius of a forward operating base, we came under fire. people were taking contact every day. that's on the military side. the political side is even worse. the -- general mcchrystal talked -- hyped a lot the government in a box that was supposed to roll out. this was the centerpiece. the marines come in and clear and we move in with an administration to build the deposit there. the entire government in a box failed to deploy. it desserted. there was supposed to be from the mayor down to one imaged secretaries, trash collectors, whatever, assembleed in kabul. none came except for the mayor. a man named haji, who is an afghan ex-pat who lived in germany for years. went to jail for five years in germany for attempted murder. that's the man who we chose to
9:12 pm
be the mayor, and his role is confined to being helicopter by the marines to sit in front of a meeting and helicoptered out when it's over. >> you mentioned the security forces, and one of the documents i saw today that was really stunning to me was an incident report about basically the afghan security forces and the natural police getting into a firefight with each other. how indemmic is this kind of turf warfare, open combat, how reliable are these two different national forces being trained? >> as problematic and awful as that engagement is, it would be great in it were that simple. if it was just the police against the army. it's not. it's the police and the army and a half a dozen other kinds of armed forces that are all organized around different sorts of loyalties. there's -- we made a piece about a tribal militia that was formed with disasterous effects. the u.s. military gave $1 million in aid to support a tribe that said it was going to fight the taliban, but then turns around and opposes the
9:13 pm
governor of the province. there's ap3, the afghan local protection forces. there's local warlords who, like the general in the north who operated under completely different terms, who has now become the chief of staff of the army. it's a complete mess. we're arming everybody. anybody who says they're going to fight against the taliban is being armed, and they all have different allegiances. >> i guess the final thing i want to ask here is about this -- the civilian casualties that are revealed, and, obviously, that has been reported, but it doesn't -- isn't hit home. i wonder to the degree to which that aspect of it -- what the impact? it's a simple question, but it would seem like that is a huge part of why many afghanis are probably not super psyched about the american involvement there. >> yeah. it's a huge point. i mean, actually, we -- when i was there on an earlier trip this year, we arrived the day after a special forces raid hit a small compound. the press release that came out
9:14 pm
of the u.s. military said five taliban killed, two captured. we arrived, and we found an entire farm family, all the male members of the farm family buried. from the father down to a 7-year-old child. everyone in the neighborhood said that these guys were just farmers. the two people who were captured were just farmers. a riot ensued where they marched down to the police headquarters and tried to burn it down. they broke the windows, smashed it up, and the next day the military released the two prisoners without comment, without charge, without any explanation. materially on the ground, not only is it a humanitarian crisis that civilians are dying, but it's undermining the war effort at every turn. >> just back from afghanistan, and i really appreciate you coming in tonight. >> it's great to be here. thanks a lot. today's gigantic historic leak about the afghanistan war may or may not change the course of the world, but it almost certainly changes the course of news and information. the enormity of wikileak with
9:15 pm
boingboing.net coming up. one more word. impeachment. stick around. some of nature's best ingredients. we created purina one with smartblend. new, delicious shredded morsels and crunchy bites, with real meat, wholesome grains and antioxidants, for strong muscles, vital energy, a healthy immune system, and a real difference in your dog. purina one improved with smartblend. discover what one can do. 2 coffees for my brother and me please. thanks. got it. ["dueling banjos" up and under] hold this. getting cash back on your debit card changes everything. got it.
9:16 pm
introducing the chase realcash debit card. got it. up to 3% cash back on things you buy every day, automatically. got it! [cell phone rings] excuse me. got it. the new chase realcash debit card. this isn't over. chase what matters. ♪ j-e-l-l-o ♪ j-e-l-l-o ♪ j-e-l-l-o [ child giggles ] home of one of the coldest, longest nights on the planet. and asked frequent heartburn sufferers, like carl, to put prilosec otc's 24 hour heartburn protection to the test for two weeks. the results? i can concentrate on everything i'm doing, not even think about it anymore. since i've been taking it, i've been heartburn free, which is a big relief for me. [ male announcer ] take your 14-day challenge.
9:17 pm
♪ prilosec otc. heartburn gone. power on.
9:18 pm
under the heading massive classified military document leak, there are actually two incredible and important stories battling for your attention today. the first is, of course, the story of the substance of the leak. precisely, what can be found in those 90,000 plus documents obtain and posted by the website
9:19 pm
wikileaks. the second story is a story of wikileaks itself. the story exactly how and by whom all this classified information about the war in afghanistan was revealed. it's both a fascinate and really super important story because wikileaks trying and at least to some degree succeeding in transforming the way journalism works and what freedom of the press means in the most practical terms. let's start with what it is. wikileaks is essentially the first-ever stateless news organization. it operates by using in the deepest possible sense the nowhereness of the internet to wage battle against the secrecy that is so central to how governments and companies all over the world operate. the site was launched in december of 2006 by this guy, julian assange, an australian internet activist, who deskrikz it as an uncensorable system of untraceable mass document leak and public analysis. the classified afghanistan war documents published this weekend are just the latest in a series
9:20 pm
of explosive posts that have raised the profile of wikileaks. last year they posted the cleemtgate pemos. british climate scientists were caught talking smack, and in april of this year wikileaks obtain and posted this now infamous video showing a 2007 u.s. air strike in baghdad that killed a dozen people, including two iraqis who were working for reuters. incidentally, reuters had been trying for years to get a copy of the video through the freedom of information act, when wikileaks posted it to the internet under the title collateral murder. in other words, because of what julian assange is doing, something like journalism, but deliberately not exactly journalism, we are living right now in a transformative moment. how freedom of the press works and how governments all over the world are held accountable could all changes in months and years ahead because of what's going on right this moment at wikileaks.org. joining us ruin is co-editor of
9:21 pm
bioingboing.net. >> have you written a lot about wikileaks, and i know you have been in touch with them today. i want to know, first of all, what you have learn from them today. >> i spoke with a representative of wikileaks who is in europe, and they told me that these last 15,000 documents -- there's been a lot of speculation about when they'll be released and what they'll contain. i know that some journalists have speculated that they might contain information to the war in iraq. i just got an e-mail ten seconds agoing that says that these relate to afghanistan as well, but they're taking time to redact names and specifics that could increase security risks. they're basically doing this in an effort to be as responsible as possible. >> responsibility is kind of a fascinating question in this context, right, because when you had the pentagon papers, you know, the white house went crazy.
9:22 pm
the publisher of "the times" had a relationship with them. they had a meeting at the white house. when it was reported, wikileaks had given them. they have no national affiliation, and there was both a radical result, and there are concerns about damaging or information that comes out, names of frontline soldiers that could really endanger lives. they're trying to, as you said, be responsible. what does that mean? >> i think the first thing to remember is that this tension that you are talking about between the government, between the military, and the press is not something that started today with this disclosure by wikileaks. this is something that's been going for decades. away we're seeing now, though, really strikes me that this is like what napster did to the entertainment industry. it's like what bit torn did to the entertainment industry. wikileaks remits a tipping point in control, in secrecy, in the dominance of institutions that we've known for generations over
9:23 pm
the control of the flow of information about what's happening with war. a war that we're paying for, you know? this is so much bigger than julian assage and wikileaks. it's interesting to see so much of the discussion focus odd these guys, but what we're talking about is one of many possible organizations that could spring up to perform this kind of service. >> i should note that this is all taking place against the context of a massive explosion in the amount of classified documents since 9/11. there's been -- while this is happening at one end, while this is one tool, there is this massive move by the state to bring things more under this sort of secret protective curtain, but i do wonder. assage reminds me of ben kingsley in "sneakers." i do -- you know, this is the same group that published sarah palin's emails and they published the stuff that came out of east anglia with climate change. i do wonder if there is a certain amount of power that
9:24 pm
that confers, and it's one thing to get documents about a state that's waging a war, and i agree this is kind of remarkable, but it's another when those are the private emails of someone. you know, i wonder ultimately to whom wikileaks ends up being accountable. >> well, it's possible for anybody to publish secrets on-line. the difference here is that wikileaks has a big platform that a lot of people are paying attention to. i don't think they realized how powerful they were. over the past six months or so weave seen them grow up in some important respects. they've certainly applied some restraint in releasing this material, or so the statements would lead us to believe. i think for me what's most interesting and most concerning about where this story goes from here is what kind of backlash we're going to see. >> yes. >> the government, big institutions wanting to crack down on leaks like this in ways we have never seen before. >> xena jordin, thank you for joining us. >> it's my pleasure, chris. if republicans regain the house this fall, they have two
9:25 pm
choices. one, embark on an ambitious slate of lijs las vegas to improve the lives of americans they have been elected by, or to throw the kitchen sink, the dish washer, the slap chop and all the sauce pans in an effort to impeach president obama. why i think republicans are going to go ugly. that's next. hi, ellen! hi, ellen! we're going on a field trip to china! wow. [ chuckles ] when i was a kid, we -- we would just go to the -- the farm. [ cow moos ] [ laughter ] no, seriously, where are you guys going? ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! ni hao! [ female announcer ] the new classroom. see it. live it. share it. on the human network. cisco.
9:26 pm
sdmrimplt there are fresh signs that republican plans for after the midterm election will make 1995 and 1996 look civil and productive. can you imagine pining for the good old days of kenneth starr? look into the possible future, that's next. get one of these every six months you go without an accident. [ judy ] what are you waiting for? call or click today for a free quote
9:27 pm
or to find an allstate agent. you can get a great deal on a volkswagen. sounds terrific. cars built for the autobahn. actually, we're both pretty conservative drivers. ooh! shoot the gap. shoot the gap! whoo! so, they all come with carefree maintenance? yep, scheduled maintenance is included. i like the color. good. [ male announcer ] the autobahn for all event. lease the jetta limited edition for $199 a month or get 0% apr. ♪
9:28 pm
9:29 pm
in election news today, folks, last week former failed presidential candidate and current up setter of apple carts mr. tancrito issued an ultimate mate imto republicans running in the colorado gubernatorial candidate. get out or get tancredoed. if they refused to drop out, tom tancredo threatened run as a third party candidate on the american constitution party ticket. well, monday at noon has come and gone. no one is dropping out, and tom tancredo has made good on his promise. he is the anti-immigrant candidate. he is the bomb mecca candidate, but perhaps most hilariously, he is also the impeach obama candidate. for reasons that are as inexplicable as they are lackey, mr. tancredo thinks president obama should be impeached.
9:30 pm
even though his name will not have an r next to it on the ballot, if he makes it that far, it is increasingly clear the republican governoring strategy, should they win back one or both houses of congress this fall, can best be described as clinton era-esque and then some. republicans in the house and senate wrote a letter to the democratic chair of the senate judiciary committee demanding an investigation into the justice department's decision to not pursue a voter fraud case involving the new black panther party. they want a full and complete investigation into this outrageous decision by the obama administration not to pursue criminal charges, just like the bush administration. that's not the point. the point is this tactic works. investigators are now looking into the case which is described by one of those investigators, thusly, quote, "this has to do with their, meaning republicans, fantasied about how they could use this issue to topple the obama administration. my fellow commissioners had this wild notion that they could bring eric holder down and
9:31 pm
really damage the president." that's right. she said fellow conservatives. she's a conservative. the bush administration appointee. she's calling this a witch hunt. it is republican congressman darrell isa who has really spearhead this part of the republican governoring strategy. he has played all the songs from the greatest hit collection. he requested a special prosecutor to investigate the white house. he demanded travel documents from the administration. he has promised that if republicans take back the house this fall, he will practically double his team of investigators capable of issuing subpoenas. remember how awesome the clinton years were? the $2 million arkansas project launched by a conservative magazine to take president clinton down? whitewater? ken star? trooper-gate? the conspiracy theory that president clinton was running drugs out of an airstrip in arkansas? yes, the bad old days. who can forget republican congressman dan burton shooting a watermelon in his backyard to prove that an administration official could not have
9:32 pm
committed suicide. this is the governing strategy republicans want to return to if they win back the majority this november. you don't have to take my word for it. >> i think all we should do is issue subpoenas and have one hearing after another. >> now, congressional oversight is good for democracy. it is crucial, in fact, and when darrell issa demanded treasury release documents related to the bailout of aig, i cheered. oversight and witch hunts are two very, very different things. the republican party today is way more influenced by its fringe than it was during the days of newt gingrich and tom delay. hard as that may be to believe. if you like the impeach, investigate, subpoena approach of the 1990s, which slowed and/or stopped the function of the government, then no need to hop about into your own hot tub time machine. just watch what we're in for if the gop regains congress in the midterms. i guarantee you it will make you miss ken star. ♪
9:33 pm
♪ [ male announcer ] he's sweet, even with 1/3 less sugar than soda. kool-aid delivering more smiles per gallon. even responsible people get into accidents, which is why we do all we can to help you move on after one. [ engine turns over ] and when you insure both your home and car with us, we dit for even less.
9:34 pm
liberty mutual insurance. responsibility. what's your policy? my sunglasses.
9:35 pm
♪ people say i'm forgetful. maybe that's why we go to so many memorable places. love the road you're on. the subaru outback. motor trend's 2010 sport/utility of the year. by this time tomorrow the senate should finally have their hands on an energy bill, an energy bill already gutted by the democrats of any truly comprehensive effort to curb
9:36 pm
greenhouse emissions. thanks to perpetual republican opposition, even a scaled back attempt, some kind of cap on carbon, is off the table. instead, the bill will focus on just four main areas. liability for oil spills, including raising the liability cap to $10 billion, promoting natural gas, including incentives of about $4 billion for trucks that run on nitro gas, energy efficiency with $5 billion going towards incentives for retro fitting homes to be more energy efficient, and green jobs. that's it. that's the core of the energy bill. okay. great. now, there's good news and bad news here. well, there's really mostly bad news, which is that a coalition of denialist republicans and cowardly democrats have watered down vital legislation to the consistency of consumme. we want to deliver the hope here where there is at least the possibility of action, even with the senate locked in the
9:37 pm
straight jacket of fukdz. the president doesn't need the senate in order to do something truly far-reaching about our dependence on fossil fuel. as reported in "the nation" magazine, all he actually needs is a pen. christian is joining us now. hey, christian. >> hello, chris. >> how are you doing? >> good. thanks for having me on. >> explain to me how this works. you call it the big green buy. what is it? >> the government, state, federal, and local, in the united states is about 38% of the u.s. economy, so the issue in making a transition from fossil fuels to clean technology at the heart of it is a question of the price of clean technology. right now it's a little too expen expensive. there is a price gap. how does this price gap be eliminated? maybe there's legislation, whatever. an easier way would be for the federal government to use the power of the purse to transform the way it is already purchasing energy, buildings, vehicles, to buy clean technology. the federal government is the
9:38 pm
largest consumer of energy in the world. it has the largest vehicle fleets in the world. it has a huge stock of buildings. luckily, obama in october of last year signed an executive order that said that government agencies should, in fact, begin to purchase green power and clean technology and come up with plans for doing this. there have been a lot of previous executive orders of this sort, but this one included actual targets on reducing the carbon footprint of the federal government, so this would be a good thing in and of itself, but what it will do is it will create economies of scale for this new technology like electric vehicles, for example. >> yeah. let's talk about that, because in practical terms, you tell the one story of the company that's making electric trucks, and they talk about having to order parts ten at a time. what would it mean if they got an order of 500 trucks from the government? >> it would mean that they could reduce costs between 30% and 40% on these different components, because what they do is they put electric motors into -- on to chassises and, you know, they
9:39 pm
have to buy wheel chassises, wire harnesses from the automotive supply chain in general, and buying in bulk reduces your costs, and one of the key things that has to come down to cost are batteries, so there are a lot of ways in which the federal government could expand the use of electric vehicles. the post office is one of them. 150,000 vehicles, all of which travel basically in 20 mile loops every day, park in the same place every night. perfect for elect fiction. there's really no reason the post office should ever buy another gas postal vehicle, except for the long haul trucks, until batteries are up to speed on that. >> one of the things that's so interesting in the article is you talk about this sort of gap in financing. you know, everyone wants to talk about invasion, but what ends up happening is that we get invasion, and then what happens after that. that second stage. what is the problem there in terms of finance sng. >> developers of clean technology call it the valley of death. there's a lot of capital. frequently, it's government subsidies, to create new technology.
9:40 pm
this is not just for clean technology. this is for cell phones and flat korean tvs to invent the gadget, and then once some sort of gadget has been proven in the market and is profitable, there's usually lots of money in the capital markets to buy that company and keep selling things, but in between is the valley of death where there's a dearth of capital to get from victory in the lap to victory in the market. the federal government could help cross that by becoming the main purchaser of clean technology, and we have to remember that this is how a lot of high-tech has achieved mass market penetration is because the federal government not only paid for the early rnd, but also was frequently the first or second generation consumer. another thing that could happen would be for the federal government to create a green bank which would primarily provide loan guarantees to essentially insurance for the frightened private markets to come in and fund companies that are trying to bring new battery technology, storage battery
9:41 pm
capacity for storing energy, smart grid technology, all that sort of stuff. >> great. everyone should check out that article "the big green buy" in "the nation" by christian parenti. thanks for coming by. whatever you think the righteous consequences should be from last week's spectacularly awful shirley sherrod incident? reverse it. apparently the only failure is failing too small. a lesson in upward futility next. it can happen anytime, when you least expect it...
9:42 pm
a regular moment can become romantic. and when it does, men with erectile dysfunction can be more confident in their ability to be ready with cialis. with two clinically proven dosing options, you can choose the moment that's right for you and your partner. 36-hour cialis and cialis for daily use. cialis for daily use is a low-dose tablet you take every day, so you can be ready anytime the moment's right. >> tell your doctor about your medical condition and all medications and ask if you're healthy enough for sexual activity. >> don't take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. >> don't drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache, or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. >> if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, stop taking cialis and call your doctor right away. >> 36-hour cialis or cialis for daily use. ask your doctor if cialis is right for you. you can be ready for your moment with cialis. i love running my tongue across my teeth
9:43 pm
and feeling all the stuff i missed. as long as i get all the stuff i see, it's fine. [ male announcer ] no one really wants plaque left on their teeth, but ordinary manual brushes can leave up to 50% of plaque behind. that's why you want an oral-b power brush. inspired by dental tools, they clean away plaque in ways a manual brush can't for that dentist-smooth, clean feeling every day. fight plaque with real power. oral-b power. sfwa so the shirley sherrod cycle gives way to a new cycle? who gets taken by the cleaners? we seen seam to live in a bizarro world. ngth bayer aspirin to treat pain ngth plus an alertness aid to help you get off to a running start. try bayer am the morning pain reliever.
9:44 pm
9:45 pm
the shameful eruption of racism around the firing of shirley sherrod should have ended with a website losing all credibility as an objective news source, but since lately we seem to be living in bizarro world where right wing smears are taken as truth, 41 votes equals a majority in the senate, and reverse racism is a bigger problem than, you know, actual racism. that's not what happened. today talking points memo revealed an invitation to a big rnc event happening neck month in beverly hills, and whom do republicans want to be associated with? who instead of getting run out of town on a rail is the first name featured on the invitation? the very same guy behind the entire sorry trumped up hoax. a man whose name i'll happily
9:46 pm
refrain from mentioning. by now after his fake acorn scandal and after his fake shirley sherrod is a racist and so is everyone at the naacp's scandal, no one should say his name. there should be a rule in every politician's outlook to forward every e-mail with his name on it to junk. is he good for republican fundraising. in bizarro world. now let's look at who lost out during last week's frenzy over fake racism. on thursday the senate stripped billions of dollars in an aid out of its emergency war supplemental spending bill, including more than $1 billion in payments to black farmers who won a racial discrimination lawsuit against the aing cultural department. the plaintiffs include sherri sherrod. it was in the war spending bill in the first place because republicans have stripped it from every other bill it was
9:47 pm
included in this year. we don't know if shirley sherrod caused the rnc to sign up the culprit as its headliner, and it doesn't appear that last week's fake scandal was what caused the senate to strip it from the real-life documented discrimination from the appropriations bill. it's just that as the dust clears from last week's collective frenzy, take a look at the score. conservative conartist one, victims of real world racial discrimination, zero. joining us now is john boyd jr., founder and president of the national black farmers association, himself a farm ner virginia. mr. boyd, thank you for your time. >> thank you, chris, for having me tonight. >> let's just start with the basics. i think it's pretty safe to say most people really don't know that much about the class action discrimination lawsuit against the usda or the history of racial discrimination in the agency. what was at issue in the lawsuit and the settlement? >> well, the issue was about black farmers being descriminated, and usda lending programs from subsidy programs.
9:48 pm
we've lost millions of acres over the past decades, and we've been fighting this lawsuit, the black farmers versus the united states department of agriculture, for many, many years. the first settlement was settled in 1999 with 22,000 black farmers able to go through that process. 14,000 black farmers were meritous, and after that the government fought us tooth and nail on class notification, so nearly 70,000 black farmers came after the filing deadline. >> let's just -- it seems like there was a settlement in 1999. then people came forward. the usda was reviewing each person, right, to see if they were going to pay out a claim, and they were striking a lot of them. spoo what happened is many of the black farmers came after the filing deadline. they were denied access to take part in the class action lawsuit, which brings us to today where we have 70,000 black
9:49 pm
farmers and 2008 then senator barack obama sponsored our bill in the senate, which passed into law, which allowed those 70,000 black farmers to have their cases heard based on its merit, and also applied $100 million in that bill. today we are out here today still looking for the appropriation where the president put in his budget for $1.15 billion. the total settlement is for $1.25 billion, and we've been shut out of the senate by republicans. we never had one republican vote for this measure in the senate, and i'm here today calling on minority leader mitch mcconnell to do the right thing by black farmers, and we ar also calling on senate leader harry reid to introduce a bill this week, a freestanding bill, and we would like to see a vote on that bill this week so that black farmers can finally see justice here in this country. >> do you think there's support
9:50 pm
on capitol hill for this? first of all, i want to make sure that people -- this is -- this $1.25 billion is restitution for a very long and documented list ofusda's malfeasance and discrimination against black farmers for years and years and years. this is just catching up now. do you think there is congressional will on capitol hill to have that vote happen? >> i would like to thank the congressional black caucus, who helped lead the way along with speaker pelosi, with that bill passed twice, once in the tax extended bill and here recently in the war bill. both of those bills failed in the senate. we were also in a bill earlier this year that also failed. so we've been out here a very, very long time and it's time for the senate to step up and do the right thing for black farmers and pass this bill so that black farmers can get on with their lives. many are older now, we're dying, we're losing land. i've been to more funerals this year than i've been to in my life, where ten years ago, the average black farmer was 60 so
9:51 pm
they're now 70 years of age and many are dying off, waiting for justice. so we're calling on the senate to take the appropriate action and to do it now for our nation's black farmers. they shouldn't have to wait another day. we went to court, we won in court, there's been report after report, the civil rights action team report at usda where it investigated itself and found itself guilty of discriminating against black farmers. so here we are waiting for justice and i look at what happened to mrs. sherrod where she was, you know, just fired right on the spot there, and here we have 80,000, nearly 80,000 late filers total and not one person's been found for the act of discrimination against the black farmer. >> john, i will stop you right there. sorry, we're up against a break. john boyd, jr., founder and president of the national black farmers association. i really appreciate you coming on tonight. >> thank you very much for having me. >> coming up on "countdown" the pg-13 term one colorado republican candidate uses to
9:52 pm
describe the birthers. put it this way. the first word is dumb. coming up on this show, i will talk about cupcakes and if there's time, the deficit. but definitely cupcakes. [ female announcer ] it's crabfest at red lobster. the best time to crack it... twirl it... dunk it... and discover more new ways than ever to enjoy crab. like our new crab lover's trio with crab-stuffed shrimp, and succulent north pacific king and snow crab legs. or our decadent crab and shrimp pasta. new crab creations for every craving, starting at $14.99,
9:53 pm
only during crabfest. right now at red lobster. ♪ j-e-l-l-o ♪ j-e-l-l-o ♪ j-e-l-l-o [ child giggles ] [ cellphone beeps ] [ tires screech ] [ cellphone beeps ] and if you've got cut-rate insurance, you could be payin' for this yourself.
9:54 pm
so get allstate. [ tires screech ] [ dennis ] dollar for dollar nobody protects you from mayhem like allstate. [ dennis ] dollar for dollar ♪ then this song probablyn with mdoesn't apply to you ♪r whoo-hoo ♪ ♪ but if you're like most people i know ♪ ♪ you could use some help understanding your credit score so ♪ ♪ 1-2-3-4 free-credit-score ♪ ♪ dot-com on, yeah dot-com on, sing it ! ♪ vo: offer applies with enrollment in triple advantage.
9:55 pm
so when i explain the federal deficit, i like to do it with desserts. what, you don't? metaphorically, say red ink is calories. the more you eat, the more weight you gain and the less healthy you'll be. while you can indulge in this one little cupcake, rachel, you picked a bad week to be on vacation. while you can eat a little cupcake, you want to make sure you don't go hog wild and dive face-first into the entire luscious chocolate cake. excuse me. good? all right.
9:56 pm
now, there was a time when our country was practically ready for skinny jeans. president clinton handed president bush $128 billion surplus in 2001. president bush went right for the chocolate cake. >> the growing surplus exists because taxes are too high and government is charging more than it needs. the people of america have been overcharged and on their behalf, i'm here asking for a refund. >> then another serving, cake for breakfast. president bush offered the wealthiest taxpayers big breaks in 2001 and 2003. seeing an unhealthy surplus, america cheated on its diet. they had been so good for so long, right? now, the budget reconciliation rules by which congress passed the tax cuts meant that those cuts would have to expire in 2010. the cuts added tens of billions to the deficit right away. that's the blue part of this. under budget reconciliation, you're only allowed to do that
9:57 pm
for a ten-year period. so congress back then essentially locked congress now into making a choice about whether to keep the tax cuts, which expire at the end of this year, and the way it's set up, a decision to let those tax cuts go away looks like a tax hike, which of course is dangerous ground for lawmakers in an election year like this. problem is, america isn't in its skinny jeans anymore. so you would think the deficit hawks would want to cut back on the cake, right? no, hardly. republicans are acting like the same tax cuts for the rich that drove us back into deficit spending are now the only way to avoid wrecking the economy. >> the other thing is republicans believe that tax cuts create more money. create more wealth. >> you hit small businesses with these kind of tax rate increases and you'll slow down the economy further. look, 75% of those who will get hit with these higher tax rates are successful small businesses. >> the reality is 50% of those affected by the tax hikes are small business people. they're the ones creating the
9:58 pm
jobs. so we got to set the rhetoric aside and i think all commit ourselves to help small business. >> 75%, 50%, more, some, any. this is a bipartisan pig-out i should note. some fiscally conservative democrats are lining up with the republicans to have their proverbial cake and eat it, too, like senator evan bayh of indiana. >> we don't need to raise taxes now. eric is exactly right. >> whatever the bush tax cuts cost us later, if they get extended now, will be larded directly on to the federal deficit and these same deficit hawks who fashioned themselves as economic nutritionists are calling for just that outcome. some icing for you, senator conrad? he says we know that very soon, we got to pivot and focus on the deficit. it probably is too soon to cut spending or raise taxes. senator ben nelson, whose office says he supports extending the expiring tax cuts at least until the economy is clearly recovering and supports addressing them before the fall
9:59 pm
elections. take a step back from the dessert table for a moment if you can. the center on budget and policy priorities recently looked at the real costs of renewing the bush tax cuts. see the darker orange mass? that represents the bush tax cuts. right now in 2010, their impact on the deficit isn't as big as the overall economic downturn or even recovery measures but watch as we get closer to the end of this decade. if obama gets his way and the middle class keeps its tax cuts, it would save $700 billion over the next ten years but if he doesn't, keeping all the tax cuts is projected to add another $2 trillion to the deficit. two trillion is a lot of cake, people. they want the country to keep eating every day, all day, forever. and at the same time these same advocates of indulgence for the wealthy recipients of bush era gluttony are talking day and night about how all the folks on social security and unemployment need to get on a diet. but if it's serious about cutting calories, congress has an easy decision ahead of it. maintain tax cuts for

144 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on