tv [untitled] March 27, 2013 3:30am-4:00am EDT
when some rebels are firing at israeli troops or patrolling on the go and hurts so first and foremost is rose interested in peace quiet tranquility and the situation not affecting its own security and well being of its citizens ok sagal in london would you like to jump in here it sounds kind of benign what we just heard. well i think the israeli problem is with the people not with the good regimes israel has never had problem with the regimes in any of the countries their problem is always with the people in the in that region that are more city toward the toward israel is so deep rooted that it doesn't matter what. and if you have a situation where there is no dictatorship like the one which exists at the moment then it's going to be free for all to vent their anger to take whatever measures that have and this is the point that israel is what it about certainly as far as been so far it's been very quiet they don't know how it's going to be when it's
when the regime collapses and i think this is the point that they are about but at the same time they are. happy that the syrians are destroying themselves are committing suicide destroying that army and killing their people they hope that this will also end up by getting hizbullah and iran influence and i got that i want to go to those topics a little bit later now bill in washington you jump in what is it israel's objectives here let me first define the syrian conflict because without a proper definition of things would be confusing they see their conflict is the end of world war one and this means many important developments i think is an old goal shared by egypt to stop syria from becoming a wide that regional crisis with c.d.'s geopolitical implications that are basically favorable to any disruptive force in that part of the middle east ok
dan so it looks like israel as you know is getting what it wants because syria is destroying itself. well i don't think that the comment made by his correct or the israelis are enjoying this one bit i think it's a great tragedy and that is how it is viewed by many many israelis i do agree with the comments regarding the egypt concern and the same the same the concern that this thing will spill over or become a regional crisis and israel has taken the steps even this week as we've seen patching up a longer. tense relationship with turkey just for the sake of having the opportunity the possibility to strange views in intelligence and other resources with turkey as these two countries look at the syrian crisis so.
i reject the notion that this is enjoyable i think on the contrary israel wants at the end of the day for the syrian situation to stabilize for the syrian people to have a moderate leadership smooth transition the smoothest as possible and hopefully one day also in a situation that can make peace with israel sad but what about you because we hear about this buffer zone go ahead. this idea the israeli policy is always misguided because it relies on the use of force heavy heavy use of force but i've learned of the day they talk about chemical weapons and they know this is rubbish it's not true they talk about this gyptian influence they talk about syria being the regional power all these things are self. propagated by the israelis but their problem israel is they know that this is a state that has enemies all around it and it is there and i'm also he is with the people not the regimes you can change their regimes you can have any regime you
want but at the end of the day that is exactly what they are going to end up with they are living in the wrong neighborhood their place is somewhere else probably maybe in europe or some some in the states or somewhere or another because they are unable to cope with this situation having done what has been done you have expelled the palestinians there who are scattered all over the lot of countries and now those people have empathy and sympathy with the palestinians and therefore you have this animosity and this is not going to change with the change of regime or the government or the type of government and indeed the middle east is all geared against u.s. policy because the u.s. policy has been so partial toward israel even when we had obama the other day he did not say any of the things that he should be saying he tried to play his domestic politics but as far as the region is concerned he has not done anything his. visit was not welcomed by the israelis it was not welcomed by the arabs and
everybody feels that they don't know why he came for what reason even on the city in front the u.s. has so much trouble both economically politically and militarily that it is unwilling and unable to intervene in the syrian situation it's happy that the europeans are making the right noises making the qataris pay money and send weapons and turkey receiving refugees so the policy. all of israel supported by the americans is the one which is creating this trouble for israel as well as obviously the people in the region this is this is not going to change with changing whether you have a regime of assad or islamist or whatever other terminology is used the idea that somehow israel is actually concerned about having a democratic stable regime of course this is a term used for having a government that is going to be the same as the us government when it comes to the
israeli situation do nothing about the israeli situation stop the people from fighting them and this is this is not going to change i think this is going to change whereby whatever happens the regime that is going to come is going to make israeli life more difficult and israel is going to have to take how sharon measures on syria and the neighborhood indeed in lebanon. then i let him. know bill do you want to jump in there react to what we just heard. thank you let me again focus on the regional perspective because this is not just one nation a state a trying to articulate. thought you have to realize there are also america is involved so want is the national interest of america in that sad situation i think it would be to think the submitter practic and in this case you would have the cia getting involved arming the rebels and the united states media is
acknowledging this this is no secret a second presidential leadership and this is the biggest test for obama is he going to act statesman like or is he going to shiver and procrastinate as usual and what kind of decisions obama do what kind of arrangement would he monique with the leaders of the kremlin in moscow or how he's going to deal with the opposition in syria. ah so these are very important questions so far i think obama is happy to the to see the cia aid getting into the conflict because he could not have all of them he objects to arming the rebels but the bureaucratic interest of the pentagon the cia prevailed over him so the question now is how obama how is he going to die you'd act they see i am fourth in syria again is the backdrop of the war in afghanistan the war against terror and others so it's
a very very tough test for obama and he should get more involved and more engaged in syria otherwise it could be to climb into his presidency if things deteriorate ok dan should there be more western intervention in syria before answer that i also want to relate to what the earlier totally. false claims are the are not even worth. mentioning but still israel has peace with egypt as well as pits with jordan israel on the verge of reestablishing negotiations with the palestinians of course of the syrian responsible regime comes into power i'm sure that israel will be. interested in in gauging in a dialogue to see if pieces is is possible i do is really. to deal with your focus on circulation you're talking about bills comments regarding. the bill about the
u.s. role in this i think it's absolutely critical an essential that you are steps up its efforts aiding the opposition. supplying the opposition with even greater supply and funding the already been giving coordinating activity before we go to the brain or even to the brain you can twenty seconds before we go to the very good. the usa once said design out of a position they want a particular opposition that is going to be that opposition that cannot be for instance from i'm not so they cannot be from al qaida they cannot be islamist they cannot be shiite they cannot be with hezbollah they cannot be with iran so if they want to change the regime but they want to design not a made the regime all right gentlemen i'm going to jump in here we're going to go to one short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on syria stay with our team.
to. join thousands of gadget gurus plug into the mobile world congress in barcelona for research and handset makers try to get their groove back. and software super chargers hope to spin previous successes forward russia's yandex turns up the heat on google and despite a new twist on infotainment it's not just fun and games often overlooked video engines pretty flawless streaming clover just to the palm of your hands and there's a new player in town looking to show that isn't that better than one month see i'm down here on. the central. please please. please please.
welcome back to cross talk we're all things are considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing the war in syria. ok dan if i go back to you in washington a lot of people say israel is more interested in hezbollah for example or iran not really the syrian people not at all you know the well first of all again israel is shares and sympathize as well. the agony the syrian people are going through that's first and foremost second of all of course when you look at the situation on the northern front there is a strangle of iran syria and hezbollah are not all sides of the triangle are equal
in size and in power but of course when you look at the overall situation. hizbollah is weakened by this recent crisis and israel is interested as always sir that it's interested in seeing the syrian iranian alliance somehow being either diminished or even sort of a dissociation between syria and iran and as we look at the prospects of this syrian crisis unfolding then one of the options of courses there are different scenarios there but one sure scenario is that iran syria relations will diminish in their warmth in their in their in their intimacy and so that's a course as you look at the situation this is something that israel stands to benefit from and israel hopes that this will be the case but i wouldn't equal or to it to the to the agony of the syrian people ok now bill what it what do you think
about in the angle of has been lying around in this area since the civil war. this is very important and you have to ask this question to the leaders in israel can israel fight two wars at two different fronts i think either israel has to confront one of two either syria or iran either cannot be confronting israel saudi israel cannot be confronting syria and iran at the same time so i think israel will try to establish a sense of priority is delaying the action on iran because it's more then substance and focus on c.d.'s how would the israelis focus on syria again this if there is to what i said earlier they would not take an action divorce it from the u.s. . over obama's visit is over so they will become again nervous as obama has it taitz but there will be the israeli military talking to the defense of the park
meant in the u.s. and the defense department. for an action so israel will not do any action prior to you as a consent as far as hezbollah is concerned i think israel inevitably it acknowledges that hezbollah will get involved but when hezbollah fight the is the eat is or fight the rebels that was a long story about it in the new yorker magazine detailing that many as pics of each side of the strategy but just let me make a final statement and i feel passionate about it that is a big mistake committed here chemical weapons would not be used in syria conflict because it would mean the suicide of the perpetrator each side in the sea the conflict wants to survive including the falling assad regime so this is a wrong thinking in washington chemical weapons are the last a factor to consider conversion conventional warfare are the dictates of the
conflict please pay attention to it what are you on. in the mascot's war that you are in moscow or that you are in washington or any place else chemical weapons are the last resort. in london go ahead. and i kind of go back to the point of iran i think there is a phobia which the israelis and americans have regarding iran totally opposed to iran because i come from iraq which is occupied by iran i'm not defending iran but i think there is a phobia which is in iran. israel and in the u.s. over iran he runs a role in this syrian uprising is really negligible because at the present moment there is the western powers of the us france britain. and at the same kind of. over fifty percent of the day.
and then everybody you know who's israel and in the usa cannot think of anything other than through the prism of iran iran has nothing to do with the. syria point. rubbish which is the media being peddling it because if you if you attempt to put anything toward iran everybody in the west begins to feel threatened this is just like the use of and then you can accuse anybody of anything ok at the end of the day i think certainly the effect of the syrian revolution will be to weaken hezbollah because at the present moment the contact between iran and hezbollah is through syria and that's the point that is going to be weakened however i think israel knows hezbollah can do and israel cannot afford to lose civilians and civilians will be lost if there is an intervention with there is
a conflict between hezbollah and iran that's. defending the iranians but i. i think there is a conception which is purposely done by putting iran into the picture but certainly i think at the present moment the moral position of the west to the city and conflict because everybody talks about one thing to protect the people well to do you give them freedom and democracy and in the same time they are pouring petrol on a fire ok we're ok people can got it for me dan go ahead jump in yes first of all we have the iran nuclear issue which is considered a threat not only by the united states and israel but the entire international community by the i.a.e.a. and the united nations security council and many many many other countries around the world and we cannot we cannot ignore that just us when you talk about the syrian situation there are over fifty thousand iranian.
revolutionary guard representatives in syria are growing in number syria is being supplied the cost of actually was relieved. and on side they have to. say that iran is not. the answer is a lot of settling the situation it's just it's not true that we cannot ignore the fact that iran is very much sees syria as a battleground between the iran that wants to promote the islamic revolution and other forces are trying to contain it and this is exactly what iran is doing it's using syria and its supply regime tending it looks like everybody is using syria everyone's using syria now they'll go ahead jump in. me again in for size one point if hezbollah gets what kind of missiles over further would
it apply and who the target is i believe the conflict in syria centers over roads and highways something similar to the nine hundred forty eight conflict and basically as sad moves his troops inside big roads in cities if they are including hezbollah that's a factor that's a strategic military factor but also the highways among c.d.n. cities and the highways linking syria with the surrounding countries these are the domains the rains who are hizbullah rebuilds possibly israel or the city troops loyal to assad are moving so this is the landscape of the battle the are going to be shooting at each other being a cop turned or will define the outcome of the battle so the question is does hezbollah own he copped that can have maxi capabilities as
does and i'm quite sure that he would be receiving very important technicolor information and operational experience from his russian military advisors so you have to define how his well that would get and what i fear is that there will be hostages there would be people who are made personnel taking hostages prisoners of war p.o.w.'s and that can increase the maximum bargaining power of each side if hezbollah captured is there even is that could be done through mental. on the other hand if these are eight is captured hezbollah fighters or even a neon's that all sort can become more complicated so the fight will center over the factors that are they think it through the type of warfare a c.d.r. would experience and. this is why i'm saying that the obama administration has to be a more serious about the syrian conflict because it is deteriorating and we are witnessing
different methods of warfare that could complicate the situation a great deal the us administration cannot do anything anymore i the present moment the u.s. administration has. four of that they have a problem already in afghanistan trying to pull out the pulled out of iraq they have an economy a quagmire the idea that somehow they get involved in another war because we've seen even. the pilot have to nato because they couldn't afford to do that at the present moment no american and european is going to intervene militarily and the situation in syria especially that the syrians are committing suicide themselves so why should anybody interfere you just get them out of weapons and you get the qataris and the rest of the ducks and everybody else to do that and you let them kill each other out and then the chief objectives that is western objective
u.s. objective and israeli objective and i think this is not going to be the end because if the regime which is being keeping quiet some five if it goes you're going to have you don't know what you're going to get in its place and what you get in its place is probably nobody has bargained for that matter of choosing individual. men here again i want to give you the last word twenty seconds go ahead. well first of all israel is not going to intervene as not in lebanon not in syria unless provoked we've seen as i said we can and we've seen it. conduct activities outside the region in places like both garia and other places and i think that right now the best thing to do is that i do agree that chemical weapons will be the last resort but one cannot rule out the use of chemical weapons by any of the forces that are
in play now in syria gentlemen to watch i have to jump in here for a fascinating discussion many thanks to me to my guests in washington and in london and thanks to our viewers for watching us here at r.t. see you next time and remember. when their own country can't offer them a living loving mother sometimes have to leave their children behind. i don't like to want to just depend long. it's the dream of millions of migrants that their children might choose their motherland.
i want my children to win over moscow. russia has become this step mother land. migrants working hard to find a way home. i mean so the only city in europe i'm the host of the twenty fourteen winter olympic games. sunset. bank a. tsotsi. bank the sun a. dog days are gone and the pride days it. takes a common. sudsy it's so true. lem go for.