this is, but if we take with nato and you countries virtually all of them subscribe to certain doctrines and maintains cyber task forces, they are a cyber army on behalf of a country. that's their job. a in an exclusive interview with our tea rushes for a minute to says moscow will react to flagrant a 10 by berlin to block ortiz, new german language channel of to europe's leading satellite provide. it removes a to the request of the countries media regulator. we cannot tolerate it any longer and we believe it is unacceptable. situation will go on. we will have to respond to it. so you'll have rob also questions the impartiality of the ongoing trial into
the downing of flight m. h. 17 in east and ukraine. in 2014 prosecutors, a de mounting life sentences for the suspects, including 3 russian nationals and a raw rages within the u. s. democratic party, after one of its own senators effectively torpedoes, jo biden's lavish infrastructure bill in the senate. we look at why it's feeling a crisis of confidence among democrats. ah . why from out international moscow? welcome to our will these at 8, be kevin no. first in the same name, the russian foreign ministry, her survey leverage has given r. t an exclusive live interview, which she touched upon a range of key world issues. ah. one
of the main points with the lever of disgust was the removal of our german language channel. archie, dirt from europe's main satellite network provider can happen just moments before the interview. the move came at the request of germany's media regulator. mr. oliver of slammed the action against the channel, which only began broadcasting last week, and warned that it was unacceptable behavior on the part of berlin, and that there will be consequences on oscar additional. just the was nicole. we have been tempted to respond similarly. but until recent times, we were convinced that we do not want to follow the same path and tried to put pressure on media to follow suit with our western partners. but you know the same thing with russian security. we cannot tolerate it any longer. and we believe if this unacceptable situation will go on, we'll have to respond to it. what it wants, in an interview with rushes, mtv network cremeans spokesperson to me to pascal said, berlin's behavior formed part of a disturbing pattern. bocurel of conservatives to muslim for a month. the blocking of the whole network in europe contradicts european spirit
and all norms and principles of the organization for security and cooperation in europe. but unfortunately, neither europe nor the u. s. cares about such things the day, and they do what they want. we have a cowboy reality now. and in such circumstances, russia should act confidently, neatly and persistently. for some context penalty does face a barrel of resistance and allegations along the way since it launched last thursday. it's the case of not having the necessary documentation to broke out in germany, but t management says its license was obtained in accordance with all the repeal laws and regulations. further, the new channel was also taken off youtube. the very day was launched. technically there's no connection between that of the german tv broadcast dispute. at launch an official for a german media watchdog said that the new channel would be taken care of. this is up the state within response to the latest news. on my line i today the german regulator forced european satellites service util,
set 9 to remove the broadcast of when you moscow based german language channel, archie deutsch. from its platform. it is an appropriate for the gemini regulator and a b, b to a reach and ignore the european convention or trans frontier television under which it is subject, thereby forcing use or sat to remove assay dodge from the carrier solely due to the unsubstantiated and factually flawed claims of the german regulator, we believe this amounts to illegal pressure and confident this action will be redressed by the courts will be seeking all possible remedies against the german regulator and our audience can continue to access our content across multiple platforms and online. the reason that's happening is because nobody wants competition and we obviously are getting more and more popular. and the online service that we had in germany was phenomenal, is successful, i should say. and naturally, no one likes competition. and that's fair. i mean,
we all want to compete, well, trying to compete, trying to win our orders. the problem is that we want to do it perfectly legally. and we are absolutely sure. and we consulted with our international lawyers that everything we have don was exactly to the existing laws and regulations. each new channel is getting more and more resistance, which is almost like getting a metal. because that means we are getting more and more successful. they see you see us as more and more of a competition, but of course they claim something which is totally ridiculous that this is not being produced here in moscow. but you know, that's been user room is right across across the corridor. you know, the newsroom is here and this to those here. and the broadcasting facilities care and german regulators trying to persuade us this is all fictitious. we are available through many other options. i don't want to name them
all, but there are, there was a number of options for people who want to know the alternative news. and sometimes what we believe is a more accurate version of many events and then what they get from the german mainstream media. we will fight legally, and i'm quite sure that we will get the possibility to bring our version of events, which is total illegitimate, to which we are totally entitled to our viewers in germany, as well as in all other countries as well as trotting the plan that we've used was not a plan a unfortunately we are not able to use the plan a that we use the plan be that we didn't to work to. and we are going to dispute that in a court of law with another country. so now we're going to plan d and plan e. we have many of them, but one thing is certain people who want to know the different side and want to know the events of the truth that is not being brought by some mainstream german
media. have the possibility to do that to do that, and we'll try to help them as much as we can. in a closer out. he's chief executive. we spoke to political analysts, christ, bambridge thinks of the removal does illustrate german bias against the whole r t network. it's so obvious that from the very beginning, every obstacle has been made to stop artie deutsch operating. you could have problems, it's bank account be banned from youtube and know it being removed from utah, stylish the most popular platform in germany, and much of easter eastern europe. there's going to be a lot of pressure from german ruling circles, not least the government to try and keep the station of the ale. reason being, i think was a, would it to, is they don't want an alternative approach. the news, the broadcast in germany. and obviously, a strong of the german population are very keen to get a different version of the news,
what they're being paid by the mainstream media in german. or if we're going to go down the road of shutting down operators because of they are pretty afford a point of view. we wish she had to disagree. all you're going to start accused him of bias. this can be very few television stations. we will be able to walk the law be shut. okay, well apart from our it's his german channel been cut off from the european satellite network. much attention was also devoted to the escalating tensions between russia and nato. mister lover of says moscow's lost its trust in the west. not very good. money will it? they've lived to us on a regular basis from oral pledges to even political obligations enshrined in the russian a political act. this time as president food and said, we will have legally binding guarantees. at the same time, we understand that the west can violate such guarantees as well if it wants to do. she's going to. it was a very in depth interview. i'm here in a very studio to play so beats, and i thought it would use for my mr. barbara covered a real her spectrum of salient international and topics of the day from the
presence of foreign troops, us troops and syria, to the ongoing nuclear negotiations in iran. the main focal point, know, as we said, was that escalation, the ongoing crisis on the russia, ukraine border, and that's been very much a focal point of much west media. those allegations of thousands of russian troops massing on the ukraine border allegations level moscow. this is in preparation for some sort of intervention or conflict. miss lava was very clear to say that this is not something that moscow seeks or wants that russia moscow. once these issues can be resolved through daughter going through the strengthening of and fashionable institution such as the when and other organizations. and he really want to get the danger all the return or ra, returning towards a might, is right balance of power. and while insisting that dialogue is key and
not just dialogue, but also putting any sort of agreements that you sort of dialogue in writing in some sort of legal framework. and that was something that i focused on very much. and when we touched upon the expansion of nato eastwood's, mr. novel of mentioned that russia moscow does see the presence of nato military data, military, the expansion went to east, was as a threat to its security. and the west has to understand that that is the topic of concern for russia out of the compromise has to be reached if the relation that is to happen. but yamazik, priscilla global celeste to prove the heads of states and governments of clearly states that no participants of the o s. c e should insure their security by damaging security of others. so against dolphin both made this high brow and arrogant statement that no one can reach the principal. the washington treaty in accordance with which doors are open for any candidate wishing to accede to nato, we can say that we are not party to this organization. we have not signed this treaty, but we have signed
a broader pan regional euro atlantic documents that includes the principle of indivisible security. and if you install some burg, believe the native members can ignore this principle that is enshrined in their documents that are the highest level than perhaps it is indeed time for him to get a different job. because he does not perform his functions very well. and he called for the formalization within the legal framework to prevent that expanse in eastwards and that a recent discussions had been actually quite positive that washington had listened to moscow as concerns and at least a dialogue out what's happening. so at least that's something positive to take away from these tensions which have been rising over the last few weeks, prosecutors in the netherlands have ended their arguments in the case of malazan airlines flight em age 17, down to the east and ukraine in 2014 killing all $298.00 aboard the de money life sentences for the, for suspects, including $3.00 russian nationals, rushes foreign ministers once again, voiced moscow's concerns about bias in the investigation. just move new myrtle
assumes afloat. system were closely following the case because it's about russian citizens who the defendants at this stage of the trial were surely conceive you attempt to create an impression that it's a problem of the state rather than a criminal case. that is completely unacceptable. it should be considered a criminal process, was 7 and a half years on after a trial that has seeped with politics for its duration. and prosecutors have arrived at their version of events. they have now put forward charges against the full suspects that they believe are responsible. 3 of them, russian citizens, one of them are ukranian citizen. only one of them was represented in court by the way, by my lawyers. but this is, this is a trial that had an agenda from the onset, and this is something that multiple states have said including malaysia, which had for years has said that, that they were excluded from the trial because they weren't on board with the
agenda. they said that early on that there was a very, very clear, very clear angle to the investigation to the trial. and that was to, to blame, rush to shove all responsibility on russia. and now they were arrived at the conclusion that these 4 suspects were responsible for, shooting down and made 17, with a book in missile that was supplied from abroad. and i, for it, we demanded the suspects are convicted each individual, even a joint shooting down of an aircraft which caused the death and murder of o $298.00 people on board to life in prison. even if the suspects did not intend the consequences of their actions, those consequences still count thought i sent in thank how they arrived at this conclusion is a story ended of itself. because there has been a lot of outrage about some of the evidence that they have taken taken on board. look, they've, they included from the onset ukraine was included in the,
in investigation invited, or to the joint investigative team despite the fact that ukraine itself was at, at the time, a suspect. and a large part of the case is built on testimony from ukraine, which includes audio recordings provided by ukraine, secret services, audio recordings of the alleged suspects. apparently talking about the jet again from the onset they was suspected of being manipulated. the recordings, multiple forensic experts came out to say the same thing that they were doctor, they were edited and words were put in place and moved, moved around. but again, ukraine's evidence was taken on board by a slew of evidence for provided from her from other sources, wasn't again, the case was built much and her testimony from social media post. the witnesses were but kept secret their identities anonymous. there was also the fact that for
years now, the, the quote that j i t joint investigative team, a vos, the united states that provide an absolutely crucial piece of evidence. and that is satellite footage for, from the area from the day. the incident took place to make sure that there was that there was this book miss alt launcher on site. the united states for years now has refused multiple times to provide those satellite shots are full for the investigation. it was also an incident in which dutch m. p. 's themselves will f, flabbergasted. after reading a report that says ukraine couldn't have known, there was a threat to civilian aircraft in the area, despite the fact that just days earlier, a ukrainian military play was shot down. the last of about a dozen in the area at her at hides that were, that were dangerous for civilian aircraft. so passenger jet. and these, combined with all the evidence that was rejected by the, by the prosecutors,
has led many to believe that indeed there was bias, a groom luke a leash through. there are a large number of discrepancies, impartial, judicial process, rule violations, examination of witness bridges. witnesses classified including the one who could bring facts, ignored by the investigation to light. the fact that the defense attorneys request has been rejected without any explanation says a lot. they also ignored the allmers anti experiments which prove that investigation statement on the mistletoe abused is unfounded. the russian ministry of defense provided the documents confirming that the missile was produced in 1986 given to one of the ukrainian military units and stayed there until it was used. all this information was ignored. and again, despite over controversy all over the missing details about the, the me sal itself, where the launcher was, who controlled the launcher at the time whether it was on the ukrainian side,
on the, on the rebels side. all of those questions remain well classified. the answers to those questions remained, remain classified for now. we don't know a lot about the decision making process in the prosecution. nevertheless, the defense is due to speak in march and we are waiting for a verdict towards the end of next year. because if they're a c correspondent, still to come tonight to not his will, he's at 8 fall within the u. s. democratic party, after one of its own senators, till peter's job binds massive infrastructure bill at story more after the break lamp. ah oh, when i was showing wrong when i just don't oh, i mean you oh, yes, to shape out disdain because of the african and engagement. it was the trail.
when so many find themselves world support. we choose to look for common ground. when you, this is he thinks of tones and you think x is going to have in, you know, why happen instead of distinctive bringing responses engage that are relevant to you. how we experience reward and pleasure. while listening to some people looking at this is a kind of music is a kind of choreographing of our expectations to join me every thursday on the alex simon, sure. and obviously the guess of the world politics sport business. i'm show business. i'll see you then.
oh my god in fighting is broken out within the u. s. democratic party up to one of its own senators, tip the balance in the senate by refusing to vote in favor of jo biden's near to trillion dollar bill bag. better bill, joe man should immediately drew sheree from the white us. his move is seen as a fatal blow to the president's flagship plan, although apparently not by biden himself. do you believe that information hasn't worked for you? and how did you deal with that? your legislation, not some people think maybe i'm not, are interested on hold crunch book. i want to get things done. i still think there's a possibility. can you go back better, john? although biden seemed on phase that did pay the way for a further rift in american politics with the democratic party, now, facing a crisis of confidence, assess, could taylor reports by didn't promise to build back baxa. but then a long time friend joe mansion went to fox news and blew up the president's
campaign promises. and i cannot vote to continue with this piece of legislation. i just can't, i've tried everything humanly possible. i can't get there. you're done. this is, this is a, no, this is a no, and with it, it seems his whole party. we all knew that send or mention couldn't be trusted in, you know, the, the excuses that he just made, i think, are complete. and let bristle america explained to the people of west virginia, why he doesn't have the guts to say about the powerful special ed. what senator mentioned did yesterday represents such an increased breach of the trust of the president. and it's also, you know, this is exactly why it's an outcome that we had warned about. we have been saying this 4 weeks that this would happen and we took the hit. our leadership needs to step up. now politics and finger pointing, go hand in hand, nothing new, right?
well, not quite because one, it's tradition for the reds and blues to spit to each other across the aisle. here, if the democrats spitting at each other and it didn't even take that much, just one man one veto, and it all came down. what made mansions, treachery, aldermore, unforgivable, was that he was biden's body. a friendly face will say that from the president's viewpoint and i saw him this morning, he's worked with senator mansion over the course of decades. they share fundamental values. they're long time friends that has not changed. that's how anything biden's policies are apparently become long time friends, decades of shared values. and mansion still broke rank even though p, the loyalist, even though billed back, battle was biden's baby. and even though he knows that without the bill the mid times, maybe a blood bath, if we could get the bill back better plan past, democrats will have a strong possibility of at least keeping the senate. it's tough, it's
a tough reality. in today's america, where it's party above all mansions, vito spells trouble for biden, and it really couldn't have come out. it was time the afghanistan withdrawal on the con, tearing through us. hi, petra price says a supply chain still in crisis record inflation on a historically low popularity rating of just 41 percent. at a time like this, you need your people move and that's why you need a rallying cry. what does bite and have a party embroiled in fighting his signature legislation and the dot and now defecting democrats with rumors that is just the tip of the iceberg member, we had an individual reregister from democrat republican and i think there are a few other democrats out there that are thinking about it, why not because they've changed, but the party has changed with what appears to be a crisis of confidence in this changed party. the last thing the democrats can
afford is a crisis of confidence in the president himself, but looks like that's exactly what they've got, who the real president, it is country joe mentioned joe biden, man and wife for the con charlemagne. i realize it's job by chance. no, no, no, no, no, it's joe biden, which quite frankly, probably came as news to bite and himself, but kinda side of course, president harris. the proud howard. oh, okay. but kidding aside, the democrats got handed. the keys to success. they took over from the countries moved divisive president, they took control of both the house and senate, and yet here, just 11 months on their in disarray with the president probably looking on and thinking that maybe instead of building back better, it might be worth building back a party that seems to have lost its way. as you know, of a society is already split. it is growing like daily growing almost both parties
here in america is to break up within the democratic party and in the leadership of president biden house. hasn't made it into the right enough freight elections coming up to me. it turned 2022 and our forwarded me last and as well. right thing . it shows a lot of hypocrites within the democratic party. i think the democrats know they are in for fighter fight of their lives. they have all been so rather cravat, kane so radical, that they are move far away from the main stream of america. what american people want anna? they know it's going to be off by for their life. they only all white house, anna, they own the congress and defend it, and they have been unable to get the bill back barrow ah program to govern and get it. i asked because it actually bank routes before america does what a stance one house, what and i see is when the defense forces are said to have revised there, open fire policies for the west bank territory. troops are now reportedly allowed
to shoot at palestinians throwing rocks, so petrol bombs, even if fate no longer posed an immediate threat. it's believed to have been in effect for a month of so already the idea maintains the preferred outcome for the soldiers is still an arrest. not shots. however, the legality of the reported change is being questioned. to night, previous policy stated that soldiers who are allowed to open fire while only trying to arrest a suspect, and only if the person is still throwing rocks so petrol bombs, not after the attack. the idea says this allowed suspects to flee the scene there with impunity and that the change was necessary to prevent it. so the policy change might be new, but they have already been a number of deadly incidents on the df opened fire. palestinian protest is back to 2015. a man was killed for allegedly throwing rocks as an office. his car in 2019 another was shorter than he was mistakenly thought of have wet to have had weapons . last year, a protest was killed after he refused to hand over a generator. and in each case the d. f is rejected. any allegations of wrongdoing
that the leader of the palestinian national initiative party says the israel military is resorting to excessive violence, justifying the killing civilians. so naughty them and allowing us to use the force whenever they want, anytime they want and whatever they want. even if the palestinians, the shooting not presenting any kind of nuclear, hopefully that they don't want. we don't want to be on the right sort of freedom. but for some determination and the state and they want to consolidate the system and discrimination. this will not provide any protection to anybody, specially that the disorder struck if you do only it will not affect any legal settlers who attacks listing with not only with the box but with guns as well
. and that means that house is sometimes nothing can justify the use of force and lethal weapons against the people who are not visiting any sense of the soldiers. and i thought he's, well, he's a de la from moscow from kevin. thanks for watching a livery. good evening. the acknowledge is a very big industry and there's lot of opportunities for moving that is not here, but we didn't bring the law in that country you're dealing with. why arrest him that the major cybersecurity challenge is the sovereignty of laws that cyberspace has no borders, no sovereignty. we ended up with, for example, the national health service in the u. k. the and
a chess was completely wiped out from a ransomware attack. if you were coming in to a clinic, because you had a test or you had an operation, they can't find your records. they had to go back to pen and paper. and so it begins 2 weeks of our christmas and new year's, the specials, in which we looked back in the year that was, and parents in the future with some of our roster of amazing guests, all heterodox thinkers, there would be caught dead on breakdown finance, corporate media 1st up, james powered counselor with all the trouble in the world today. or even here at home, the pentagon has decided to go after those within their own ranks by issuing a new policy, which could be an infringement of their own soldiers, constitutional rights. we will discuss and from jail cell to
a standing ovation cow rittenhouse, life has turned a 180 over the last month. but will you seek legal action about those who are the 1st to condemn him? we will discuss that with our legal expert. well, it used to be hard, but now harvard getting in harvard has announced that no standardized test requirements for the next 5 upcoming classes will be required. we will tell you why and if other schools will follow. and sadly, we are continuing to see the numbers once again of a horrible disease which became worse under the pandemic. all made illegal by state government in order to help people cope with a pandemic, a predictable outcome, which as sadly will cost lives and scale hughes and these stories and warranties and news news use right here on our to america. ah,
one year ago president joe biden told the american people this we can join forces, stop the shouting and lower the temperature. for thou unity, there is no peace. only bitterness insured, no progress. only exhausting outrage. no nation. only a state of chaos, however, guessed that unity does not include those who do not follow every order of the white house. as this was the message i sent on monday by the, by the white house for the unvaccinated. your looking at a winter of severe illness and death for yourselves, your families and hospitals, you may soon overwhelm what happened to the theme of unity and peace, no outrage or bitterness. i guess that is easy to say when you had the impression everyone is going to go along with your.