eileen boken and californiarin e howard. >> eileen boken here on my own behalf. on the overhead is the distribution of modified and proposed pdas for the bay area. it shows a high concentration in san francisco. from the same meeting, there is a slide showing 44% of the land area within existing pdas is at risk of gentrification or displace meant by the uc berkeley displacement project. this is consistent with what is happening in the mission. according to the documents the pda process began with letters of interest for designation which were submitted in september. the time to begin community process should have been before the letter of interest was submitted. who submitted the letter of interest and what was the content? a letter of confirmation may have been submitted in september. if so, this would be a commitment to complete the pda plans by 2025. there would no locker be the option for -- longer be the option for the symbolic pda. was the letter submitted? what was the content. when it was under taken by the gang of four, did anything of these four agencie

mary, georgia, eileen, catherine howard and caroline kennedy and susan marsh. >> thank you, supervisor. i am georgia. could i have the overhead, please. one of the issues that troubles me about the sb50 is that it talks about climate change. this is a yard that no longer exists, and what is happening a lot is the yards are being turned into this. this is the same yard. that is fake grass. here is another example. you can see the surrounding yards have all kinds of growth. here is another example. they are taking out the growth and soil which captures carbon. we are losing that. with the full lot excavations, we are losing our trees. i know the trees and canopy in the city is a concern to the board of supervisors. i think that the sb50 proposal seems to be a greater extension of what we have had here. the other things the city needs to do that sb50 doesn't is okay you pan see study to understand who is living where. how much is this market rate housing being occupied? are we reaching maximum? the entitlements. you know about that. there is a pipeline. the city is densifying and the rh b

eileen, peter, catherine howard, barry and s susanna parsons. >> eileen broken. i am on my own behalf. i am strongly urging the committee to continue this item. this request is based on information from yesterday's meeting. at this meeting there was a presentation on priority development areas. additionally, there were discussions and presentations on possible changes to the arena for the current cycle, upcoming jurisdiction survey and new requirement housing elements contain equity provisions. based on statements at the meeting there could be statements to the method where priority development would have increased allocations. i am urging the board of supervisors soups and planning commission hold a joint meeting. the purpose to hear directly from the staff on the presentations regarding priority development areas and the current cycle method. i would strongly urge the board to require the planning department make a presentation to them which clearly demonstrates the current pdas have been effective. at this point in time i believe the committee does not have su