the west. suppose it freedom of the press and a provocative and threatening action brushes slammed ukraine for attempting to dangerously approach is maritime borders. ne crimea taking tensions between the 2 states to a new level, we get reaction residence on the peninsula. this was blatant provocation. they wanted to paint russia is guilty, they.

once again, we back united states back neo nazis in ukraine in 2014. and now they're using the excuse of, of military in the, you, in the russia, in the quarter. and we know the united states has more military bases than nearly any other country, any other nation in the world, and literally any other nation in the world. so we know this is all the tricks and you're absolutely right peter, they refused to recognize nicaragua, they continue to sanction their the, the entire country. people are living in in dire need right now i just got back from there. i also got back from under as, and we were really covering that as well in elections as well. the united states is refusing to recognize any of these countries and the job. i didn't, jo, my name isn't in charge really, a point i want to make this is the continuation of the us state department and of course their foreign policy. this is really nothing to do with democracy. it's more of an, it's more of the tricks and by the way, the united states government, the united states military, is very rich in talk

once again, we backed the united states back neo nazis in ukraine and 2014. and now they're using the excuse of, of military in you, in the russia, in the border. and we know the united states has more military bases than nearly any other country, any other nation in the world, and literally any other nation in the world. so we know this is all the tricks and you're absolutely right peter. they refused to recognise nicaragua, they continue to sanction their the entire country. people are living in dire need right now i just got back from there. i also got back from under as, and we were really covering that as well in elections as well. the united states is refusing to recognize any of these countries and the job by the job, by them is in charge. really. that's the point i want to make. this is the continuation of the u. s. department, and of course their foreign policy. this is really nothing to do with the mocker. see, it's more of an, it's more of the tricks. and by the way, the united states government, the united states military, is very rich in talking

once again, we back united states back neo nazis in ukraine in 2014. and now they're using the excuse of, of military in you, in the russia and in the quarter. and we know the united states has more military bases than nearly any other country, any other nation in the world, and literally any other nation in the world. so we know this is all the tricks and you're absolutely right peter, they refuse to recognize nicaragua, they continue to sanction their the, the entire country. people are living in in dire need right now i just got back from there. i also got back from dora, and we were really covering that as well in elections as well. the united states is refusing to recognize any of these countries and the job. i didn't job my name isn't in charge. really. that's the point i want to make. this is the continuation of the us state department and of course their foreign policy. this is really nothing to do with democracy. it's more of an, it's more of the tricks. and by the way, the united states government, the united states military, is very rich in

once again, we backed united states back neo nazis and ukraine in 2014. and now they're using the excuse of, of military in the, you, in the russia, in the order. and we know the united states has more military bases, nearly any other country, any other nation in the world, and literally any other nation in the world. so we know this is all the tricks and you're absolutely right peter, they refused to recognize nicaragua, they continue to sanction their the, the entire country. people are living in dire need right now i just got back from there. i also got back from under as, and we were really covering that that as well in elections as well. the united states is refusing to recognize any of these countries and the job i didn't, jo, by them, isn't in charge really, a point i want to make. this is the continuation of the u. s. department, and of course their foreign policy. this is really nothing to do with democracy. it's more of an, it's more of the tricks. and by the way, the united states government, the united states military, is very rich in talking

that's a made ongoing speculation over the situation in ukraine and the accusations towards russian and the sudanese who say they've been betrayed and had their dreams destroyed. we've got a special report about a 1000 strong protests gripping the capital there since october's group was your world news headlines for the sour on behalf for to international thanks a lot for watching. and we hope to see you again soon. ah, ah ah ah. ah. hello and welcome to cross stock. we're all things are considered. i'm funeral about the west relations with russia or it record lows. and there is no reason to believe this will change any time soon, however, is a grand bar impossible, as some have suggested also, as the fate of julie massage been sealed, ah, to discuss these issues and more, i'm joined by my guest here in moscow. maxine suits, golf, he is the director of the center for advanced american studies and moscow state institute of international relations. and we also have me 3 bob and she is a political analyst and editor and interest me internet media project gentlemen, cross roads and effect.

what appears to had a very tough conversation. ukraine remains to be a major stumbling block between us and russia. and perhaps we'll, we'll, we'll continue to, to be this stumbling block for some time. i think the major problem between moscow in washington, at this point is that the nature of the relationship has changed fundamentally since the cold war and a, the, it used to the balls around this, you know, arms control issue. and now, even though the arms control issue is still important, there, things like, you know, the world order where russia is not appreciated as a pure competitor to the united states and all the focuses on china. but russia is fierce as a major spoiler. even though i think if united states, you know, had to seriously considered its interest and security worldwide, they honestly wouldn't be a greater partner than russia, whether it comes to gutter, terrorism, or european security, or even for a pretty, you know, cynic, selfish reason says containing china i don't see the policy of pushing russia towards china by all distinctions and isolation and all kinds of

take away from the virtual summit, maxime, go ahead with the, to had a very top conversation. ukraine remains to be a major sunblock between us and russia. and perhaps we'll, we'll, we'll continue to, to be this made up for some time. i think the major problem between moscow in washington, at this point is that the nature of the relationship has changed fundamentally since the cold war. and they, it used to evolve around his, you know, arms control issue. and now, even though the arms control issue is still important, there, things like the, you know, the world order where russia is not appreciated as a pure competitor to the united states. and all the focus is on china. but russia is fierce as a major spoiler, even though i think if united states, you know, have to seriously considered its interest and security worldwide. they honestly wouldn't be a greater partner than russia, whether it comes to counter terrorism or european security, or even for a pretty, you know, cynic, selfish reason says, containing china. i don't see the policy of pushing russia towards china by all distincti

elected government in ukraine, in february of 2014. in this calendar year, according to the democratic will, the people have been, is wally in nicaragua. so this is all about neo liberalism and maintaining the status quo. and maxine is absolutely right. it is. this is a front to the united nations. it's in front of the united nations security council . what they want to do and what and what doing essential reported on the crimes neoliberalism. go ahead demo our i think you're quite right. a simon just want to share. i mean, when representatives of your grade i see on the panel discussion corruption. i mean, like, as far as i remember there were 2 sent by the conference. authoritarian regimes will not focus. yes. and i can corruption, you know, wow, do it on a starter. if you look at the amount of materials that you provided on corruption inside the former soviet union, not only in the western countries, but you know, we get a national breast it use that massively. and you are absolutely right it's, it's a shame when the people who are

take away from the virtual summit, maxime, go ahead with the, to had a very top conversation. ukraine remains to be a major stumbling block between us and russia. and perhaps we'll, we'll, we'll continue to be the stumbling block for some time. i think the major problem between moscow and washington at this point is that the nature of the relationship has changed fundamentally since the cold war. and they, the, it used to the balls around this, you know, arms control issue. and now, even though the arms control issue is still important, there, things like, you know, the world order where russia is not appreciated as a pure competitor to the united states and all the focuses on china. but russia is fierce as a major spoiler. even though i think if united states, you know, had to seriously considered its interest and security worldwide, they honestly wouldn't be a greater partner than russia, whether it comes to gutter, terrorism, or european security, or even for a pretty, you know, cynic, selfish reason says containing china i don't see the policy of pushing russia towards china by al

elected government and ukraine in february of 2014. in this calendar year forwarding and then the democratic, well, the people have been, is wally in nicaragua. so this is all about neal liberalism and maintaining the status quo. and maxine is absolutely right. it is, this is an affront to the united nations. it's a front can be nation security council where they want to do and what and what join us. i reported on the crimes amino liberalism go ahead demon. well, i think you're quite right. the assignment just want to share. i mean when representatives of your grade i see on the panel discussion corruption. i mean, like, as far as i remember there were 2 sets by the conference after the authoritarian regimes called our focus. yes. and i didn't corruption, you know, well do it on a starter. if you look at the amount of materials that you provided on corruption in size, the former soviet union, not only in the west and just by, you know, we can support what international breast use the match it. and you are absolutely right. it's the sam

i mean, when representatives of ukraine, i see, you know, the panel discussion corruption. i mean like, as far as i remember there were 2 goals set by the conference after the story, terry and review our focus. yes. and i didn't corruption, you know, well do it on a start. if you look at wiki lives, there amount of materials that you provided on corruption. emphasize the former soviet union, not only in the west and just by, you know, we can support what international breast use the massively and you are absolutely right. it's a saying when these people who use even from a technical point of view, they use the research done by weeks. and now that will pre asking, do i found mean one step closer to be extradited from united states. it's awful, and i quite agree with my see him that basically the aim, all that sounds fair is to scare people. i mean, don't you even think about becoming a bond more whistle bought a little bit too much. know that he barely escaped. he's leaving in rush. okay. he's even a rush safe by the way. i want to make us suffer. and unfortunately, i think

well, it appears the to had a very top conversation. ukraine remains to be a major, someone block between us and russia, and perhaps we'll, we'll continue to be this stumbling block for some time. i think the major problem between moscow and washington at this point is that the nature of the relationship has changed. fundamentally, since the cold war and they, it used to evolve around this, you know, arms control issue. and now, even though the arms control issue is still important, there are things like, you know, the world order where russia is not appreciated as a pure competitor to the united states and all the focus is on china. but russia is fierce as a major spoiler. even though i think if united states, you know, had to seriously considered its interest and security worldwide, they honestly wouldn't be a greater partner than russia, whether it comes to gutter, terrorism, or european security, or even for a pretty, you know, cynic, selfish reason says containing china i don't see the policy of pushing russia towards china by all distinctions and isolation and all kinds of stuff is

you mentioned ukraine. i mean, they're can, they're would, they're, um, they're, they're accusing a one side who it's doing something when they're doing it themselves. keep going, lynn. well, there's nothing like projection because in 2014 right before the nato countries to part of the, the cool in ukraine and ukraine and russia. they came to the ear and they've pledged like an hour begged to come up please. let's find the trilateral agreement between ear, ukraine, and russia. so no one has exclusively influence over ukraine, like just to partner between 3 entities and no more serious of infants and you said no, no, that's not acceptable. so, so you're, you're right to buy a, trying to draw your cranium to nato. it's affecting the, making it, putting it under us serve influence, which goes against the whole concept of multilateralism wished upon european security architecture was supposed to be based upon so, so no, it is, i think we, we really, we corrupted the language for to, along to the extent of it, i

you mentioned ukraine. i mean, they're can, they're mean they're, um, they're, they're accusing a one side who it's doing something when they're doing it themselves. keep going, lynn. well, there's about seem like projection because in 2014 right before the nato countries to part of the, the coolant in ukraine and ukraine and russia. they came to the ear and they pledged like an hour begged to come up please. let's find the trilateral agreement . between ear, ukraine and russia. so no one has exclusively influence over ukraine, like just to partner between 3 entities and a no more series of incidents. and you said no, no, that's not acceptable. so. so you're, you're right to buy a, trying to draw your cranium to nato. it's affecting the making and putting it under us serve influence, which goes against the whole concept of multilateralism, which depend european secured architecture was supposed to be based upon. so, so no, it is, i think we, we really, we corrupted the language for to, along to the extent o

you mentioned ukraine. i mean they're, they're, they're, um, they're, they're accusing a one side who is doing something when they're doing it themselves. keep going, glen. well, this does seem like projection because in 2014 right before the nato countries supported the cool in ukraine and ukraine and russia, they came to the ear and they pledged like an hour begged to come up please. let's find the trilateral agreement between you, your crime and russia. so no one has exclusively influence over ukraine, like just to partner between 3 entities and a no more series of incidents. and you said no, no, that's not acceptable. so, so you're, you're right, by trying to draw ukrainian to nato. it's affecting the making and putting it under us. sarah influence, which goes against the whole concept of multilateralism wished upon european security architecture was supposed to be based upon. so, so no, it is, i think we, we really, we corrupted the language for to, along to the extent of it. it doesn't make any sense

even a brother, you mentioned ukraine. i mean, they're can, they're mean they're, um, they're, they're accusing a one side who it's doing something when they're doing it themselves. keep going, glen over all this about seem like projection because in 2014 right before the nato countries supported the cool in ukraine and ukraine and russia, they came to the ear and they pledged like an hour begged to come up please. let's find the trilateral agreement between either ukraine and russia. so no one has exclusively influence over ukraine, like just to partner between 3 entities and a no more serious of infants and you said no, no, that's not acceptable. so, so you're, you're right to buy a, trying to draw your cranium to nato. it's affecting the, making it, putting it under us serve influence, which goes against the whole concept of multilateralism wished upon european security architecture was supposed to be based upon so, so no, it is, i think we, we really, we corrupted the language for to, along to the extent of the it, it

you mentioned ukraine. i mean, they're can, they're mean they're, um, they're, they're accusing a one side who it's doing something when they're doing it themselves. keep going, glen over all this about seem like projection because in 2014 right before the nato countries to part of that, that cool in ukraine and ukraine and russia, they came to the ear and they pledged like an hour begged to come up please. let's find the trilateral agreement between ear, ukraine, and russia. so no one has exclusively influence over ukraine, like just to partner between 3 entities and a no more series of incidents. and you said no, no, that's not acceptable. so, so you're, you're right to buy a, trying to draw your cranium to nato. it's affecting the making and putting it under us serve influence, which goes against the whole concept of multilateralism, which depend european security architecture was supposed to be based upon. so, so no, it is, i think we, we really, we corrupted the language for to, along to the extent of

you mentioned ukraine. i mean they're, they're, they're, um, they're, they're accusing a one side who is doing something when they're doing it themselves. keep going, glen. well, this does seem like projection because in 2014 right before the nato countries to part of the, the cool in ukraine. and ukraine and russia, they came to the ear and they pledged like an hour begged to come up please. let's find the trilateral agreement between you, your korean and russia. so no one has exclusively influence over ukraine, like just to partner between 3 entities and a no more series of incidents. and you said no, no, that's not acceptable. so, so you're, you're right to buy a, trying to draw ukrainian to nato. it's affecting the making and putting it under us serve influence, which goes against the whole concept of multilateralism wished upon european security architecture was supposed to be based upon so, so no, it is, i think we, we really, we corrupted the language for to, along to the extent of it, it doesn't mak

and its allies, the same with eastern ukraine. what happened in eastern ukraine? how did the situation begin? there is a lot of political details there, like lustration and things that were encouraged by the u. s. and the u. s. backed political actors at the time that created their crisis, and russia did not invade crimea or sylvester pool. they were there already. and there was a, there was a transition to crimea was reunited with russia and had been separated in 1954. so these nuances never get talked about, and so they think rushes in, violation of all these international laws, and that justifies nato expansion. so if we come to a forum, if we come to a negotiation table, these details should come out. will they though? is this what the u. s. wants do they want to have that conversation? i don't think they do. i don't think their allies do. they want to keep it in the realm of hyperbolic aggressive to drive by comments and accusations. because there you don't have to have, you know, you really don't have to abide by any international agreements or treaties. you

, doesn't ukraine? is not really not particularly concerned, one way or another is the ukraine is a cudgel in the problem is it's been built up in the u. s. media, this russian invasion that's meant to happen according to intelligent sources in january. both sides both democrat and republican of kind of bought into this narrative. so that might hamper any efforts by biden ministration to want to be seen as the piece savior and come and do some interim deal. there's going to be pressure on from democrats, not to do that to be more aggressive. and you know, if the republicans are, are aiming for on this, they want to see more intention ratchet it up. so, because that's good for the military industrial complex. so it's a, it's not a good situation politically this week, the week administration that you have in the white house now is not good at all for this situation. so that's one thing that a lot of people should be very concerned about. you know, george, that we got one more minute here. joe joe biden d

and its allies, the same with eastern ukraine. what happened in eastern ukraine? how did the situation begin? there is a lot of political details there, like lustration and things that were encouraged by the u. s. and the u. s. backed political actors at the time that created their crisis, and russia did not invade crimea or sylvester pool. they were there already, and there was a, there was a transition to crimea was reunited with russia and had been separated in 1954. so these nuances never get talked about. and so they think rushes in, violation of all these international laws. and that justifies nato expansion. so if we come to a forum, if we come to a negotiation table, these details should come out. we'll say though, is this what the u. s. wants do they want to have that conversation? i don't think they do. i don't think their allies do, they want to keep it in the realm of hyperbolic aggressive, to drive by comments and accusations. because there, you don't have to have, you know, you really don't have to abide by any international agreements or treaties. y

and its allies, the same with eastern ukraine. what happened in eastern ukraine? how did the situation begin? there is a lot of political details there, like lustration and things that were encouraged by the u. s. and the u. s. backed political actors at the time that created the crisis, and russia did not invade crimea or sylvester pool. they were there already. and there was a, there was a transition to crimea was reunited with russia and had been separated in 1954. so these nuances never get talked about, and so they think rushes in, violation of all these international laws, and that justifies nato expansion. so if we come to a forum, if we come to a negotiation table, these details should come out. will they though? is this what the u. s. wants do they want to have that conversation? i don't think they do. i don't think their allies do. they want to keep it in the realm of hyperbolic aggressive to drive by comments and accusations. because there you don't have to have, you know, you really don't have to abide by any international agreements or treaties. your

and its allies, the same with eastern ukraine. what happened in eastern ukraine? how did the situation begin? there is a lot of political details there, like lustration. the things that were encouraged by the u. s. and the u. s. backed political actors at the time that created their crisis. and russia did not invade crimea or service to pull. they were there already. and there was a, there was a transition to crimea was reunited with russia and been separated in 1954. so these nuances never get talked about, and so they think russia is in violation of all these international laws, and that justifies nato expansion. so if we come to a forum, if we come to a negotiation table, these details should come out. will they though? is this what the u. s. wants do they want to have that conversation? i don't think they do. i don't think their allies do. they want to keep it in the realm of hyperbolic aggressive, to drive by comments and accusations. because there you don't have to have, you know, you really don't have to abide by any international agreements or treaties. yo

and its allies, the same with eastern ukraine. what happened in eastern ukraine? how did the situation begin? there's a lot of political details there, like lustration, the things that were encouraged by the u. s. and the u. s. backed political actors at the time that created their crisis. and russia did not invade crimea or service to pull. they were there already, and there was a, there was a transition to crimea was reunited with russia and have been separated in 1954. so these nuances never get talked about. and so they think rushes in, violation of all these international laws, and that justifies nato expansion. so if we come to a forum, if we come to a negotiation table, these details should come out, will they though, is this what the u. s. wants do. they want to have that conversation. i don't think they do, i don't think their allies do. they want to keep it in the realm of hyperbolic aggressive, to drive by comments and accusations. because there, you don't have to have, you know, you really don't have to abide by any international agreements or treaties

and its allies, the same with eastern ukraine. what happened in eastern ukraine? how did the situation begin? there is a lot of political details there, like lustration and things that were encouraged by the u. s. and the u. s. backed political actors at the time that created their crisis, and russia did not invade crimea or sylvester pool. they were there already, and there was a, there was a transition to crimea was reunited with russia and had been separated in 1954. so these nuances never get talked about. and so they think rushes in, violation of all these international laws. and that justifies nato expansion. so if we come to a forum, if we come to a negotiation table, these details should come out. will they though, is this what the u. s. wants do they want to have that conversation? i don't think they do. i don't think their allies do, they want to keep it in the realm of hyperbolic aggressive or drive by comments and accusations. because there, you don't have to have, you know, you really don't have to abide by any international agreements or treaties. yo

what happened in eastern ukraine? how did the situation begin? there is a lot of political details there, like lustration. the things that were encouraged by the u. s. and the u. s. backed political actors at the time that created their crisis, and russia did not invade crimea or sylvester pool. they were there already, and there was a, there was a transition to crimea was reunited with russia and been separated in 1954. so these nuances never get talked about. and so they think russia is in violation of all these international laws. and that justifies nato expansion. so if we come to a forum, if we come to a negotiation table, these details should come out. will they though, is this what the u. s. wants do they want to have that conversation? i don't think they do. i don't think their allies do, they want to keep it in the realm of hyperbolic aggressive, to drive by comments and accusations. because there, you don't have to have, you know, you really don't have to abide by any international agreements or treaties. you just seem to be reacting to

s. military contractors in eastern ukraine are preparing provocations involving chemical components in the british prime ministers, approval ratings plummet to a historic low. as the fallout grows over revelations of repeated violations of colored rules last year, at the same time as the health workers are lining up to accuse him of exploitation . as your headlines, i'll be back in just under an hour of time with another look. stay with us or to international with ah, hello and welcome to cross doctor. all things are considered non p labelle. how should we describe our times? what is the zeitgeist, as they say, do we have a sense of direction and purpose? we also hear a lot about the desire to return to normal. what does that mean? now? are we actually living in the new normal? ah, to discuss these issues and more, i'm joined by my guess, lionel in new york, he is a legal in media analyst. and in paris we cross a john laughlin. he is a university lecture in history and political philosophy. right gentlemen. crosstalk rules and effect, that means you can jump in in time you want, and i

live also questions the impartiality of the ongoing trial on the downing of flight mh 17 and eastern ukraine in 2014 pro. prosecutors are demanding life sentences for the suspects, including 3 russian nationals and a dispute raiders within the us democratic party. after one of its own senators effectively torpedoes, jo bivens lavish infrastructure bill is a felony. we look at why it's fueling a crisis of confidence among democrats. those are headlines this hour that does it for me, but do not worry by calling colon break. he'll be here in just under an hour's time of the fallen fresh look at news. this is our international bud had with low and welcomed across stock. were all things are considered non purely bil. how should we describe our times? what is the zeitgeist, as they say, do we have a sense of direction and purpose? we also hear a lot about the desire to return to normal. what does that mean? now? are we actually living in the new normal? ah, it is just these issues and more, i'm joined by my guess, lionel in new your. he is a regal in media analyst. and in paris we cross the john l

at that stage, the united states actually wanted for jaundra and ukraine to get them a nato membership to start the so called membership action plan. and it was germany that stop that and then said, no, no, we don't want to do that because these countries will not add to the stability of tomato, which is one of the prerequisites and the nature of treaty oil and gas, manufacturing, electricity, telecom dies location, all of them now have a t type of infrastructure connected to the internet, so clearly realizing there's disruptive potential so that those countries can't ignore it because it threatens national security issue. but if we take nato e u countries, virtually all of them subscribe to certain doctrines and maintains selling but task forces. they are a cyber army on behalf of a country. that's their job. who? oh is your media a reflection of reality? in the world transformed? what will make you feel safer? i selection whole community. i you going the right way? where are you being led? so direct. what is true? what is great? in the world corrupted, you need to descend a join us i

more than a 100 american citizens who are in the front lot on the front lines in the trenches, in east ukraine, advising and directing ukrainian forces there preparing perhaps even a provocation. with the use of chemical weapons e, but we have heard comments from the pentagon in the white house. again, categorically denying those claims. nevertheless, it does go to show how, how hot the situation is, have pence. the situation is how hot passions are and how much mistrust there is when i bring thought but isn't when and thanks to tuning in as ever and have a great pacific day. ah, i was diagnosed with cancer in 2000, so when the doctors told me the cancer was incurable, i knew i had to make a change. so i decided to travel to one of the most toxic places in america, florida. one of florida's biggest industries and best kept secrets, is phosphoric wine in the biggest player. it was $85000000000.00 industry. is mosaic, and i, there are reports of millions of gallons of contaminated water now flowing into the florida aquifer may pro, there's a chronic i don't live here that work towards me, but th

2008 this recall bucharest summit and that state the united states, the once it's poor and georgia and ukraine to get a nato membership to start this so called membership action class and it was germany that stop that and then said no, no, we don't want to do that because of these countries will not add to the stability of tomato, which is one of the prerequisites in the nature of treaty. ah ah ah hello and welcome to cross stock were all things are considered i'm peter lavelle. what is the national mood? i suppose it depends on what kind of media you consume to say the nation is divided in highly partisan is an understatement. this is certainly what the national media wants us to think, but are we really so divided on what really matters cross sucking the public mood. i'm joined by my guess, martha bonita in palm beach. she is president of both america 1st in atlanta. we have d. dawkins, hagler, she is a political strategist and a former georgia state representative. and in boston, we cross a rory riley topping she is an attorney, a conservative commentator and a contributor at the hill heart

and ukraine is russia's soft underbelly, under no circumstances can the russian government allow ukraine to be night. so often nature forces to be even more widely deployed in the country because of that will pose a most perilous threat. so the security of russia and to the security of the russian people. and also the americans could extend their missile defense system in eastern europe into ukraine. and that would mean that the russian strategic nuclear also would be in dire trouble. so unless the americans relent and put into rights in though, as i said earlier, wrong, i don't think i played from them in writing would mean anything. but if they do put into rights in your credit, would not be admitted into the ranks of the western military block. and if they do pull their forces back from eastern europe and the state, then of course tension will somewhat decrease. but the problem is that in a year from now, in 2 years from now, we could be at this position again, that is why decisive action has to be taken by russia, because you will come when you dos. and so the ranks of nature. and by

and ukraine is russia's soft underbelly, under no circumstances can the russian government allow ukraine to be made so often nature forces to be even more widely deployed in the country because of that will pose a most perilous threat. so the security of russia and to the security of the russian people. and also the americans could extend that missile defense system in eastern europe into ukraine. and that would mean that the russian strategic nuclear also would be in dire trouble. so unless the americans relent and put into writing though, as i said earlier wrong, i don't think i pledge from them in writing would mean anything. but if they do put into writing your credit would not be admitted into the ranks of the western military block. and if they do pull their forces back from eastern europe and the state, then of course, tension will somewhat decrease. but the problem is that in a year from now in 2 years from now, we could be at this position again. that is why decisive action has to be taken by russia, because you will come when you crank dos. and so the ranks of the night. and by

and ukraine is russia's soft underbelly. under no circumstances can the russian government allow ukraine to be nato. often nato forces to be even more widely deployed in the country. because that would pose a most perilous threat. so the security or russia to the security of the russian people and also the americans could extend their missile defense system in eastern europe into ukraine. and that would mean that the russian strategic nuclear arsenal would be in dire trouble. so unless the americans relents and put in. so right though, as i said earlier, wrong, i don't think i pledge from them in writing would mean anything. but if they do put into rights and ukraine would not be admitted into the ranks of the west and military block. and if they do pull back from eastern europe and the both states, then of course tension will somewhat decrease. but the problem is that in a year from now in 2 years from now, we could be a decision. again, that is why decisive action has to be taken by russia because you will come when you cr

and ukraine is russia's soft underbelly, under no circumstances can the russian government allow ukraine to be night. so often nato forces to be even more widely deployed in the country because of that will pose a most perilous threat. so the security of russia and to the security of the russian people. and also the americans could extend their missile defense system in eastern europe into ukraine. and that would mean that the russian strategic nuclear also would be in dire trouble. so unless the americans relent and put into writing though, as i said earlier, wrong, i don't think i played from them in writing would mean anything. but if they do put into writing your credit would not be admitted into the ranks of the western military block. and if they do pull their forces back from eastern europe and the state, then of course, tension will somewhat decrease. but the problem is that in a year from now in 2 years from now, we could be at this position again. that is why decisive action has to be taken by russia, because you, we'll come when you dos. and so the ranks of nature. and by then

and ukraine is russia's soft underbelly, under no circumstances can the russian government allow ukraine to be night. so often nature forces to be even more widely deployed in the country. because of that will pose a most perilous threat. so the security of russia and to the security of the russian people. and also the americans could extend their missile defense system in eastern europe into ukraine. and that would mean that the russian strategic nuclear also would be in dire trouble. so unless the americans relent and put into writing though, as i said earlier wrong, i don't think i pledge from them in writing would mean anything. but if they do put into writing, your credit would not be admitted into the ranks of the western military block. and if they do pull their forces back from eastern europe and the baltic states, then of course, tension will somewhat decrease. but the problem is that in a year from now in 2 years from now, we could be at this position again. that is why decisive action has to be taken by russia. because you, i will come when you kind das and so the ranks of nat

and ukraine is russia's soft underbelly, under no circumstances can the russian government allow ukraine to be made so often nature forces to be even more widely deployed in the country because of that will pose a most perilous threat. so the security of russia and to the security of the russian people. and also the americans could extend that missile defense system in eastern europe into ukraine. and that would mean that the russian strategic nuclear also would be in dire trouble. so unless the americans relent and put into writing though, as i said earlier wrong, i don't think i pledge from them in writing would mean anything. but if they do put into writing, you credit would not be admitted into the ranks of the western military block. and if they do pull their forces back from eastern europe and the state, then of course, tension will somewhat decrease. but the problem is that in a year from now in 2 years from now, we could be at this position again. that is why decisive action has to be taken by russia, because you will come when you crank dos. and so the ranks of the night and by

and ukraine is roches soft. underbelly, under no circumstances can the russian government allow ukraine to be in night. so often they told us to be even more widely deployed in the country because of that will pose a most perilous threat. so the security of russia and to the security of the russian people. and also the americans could extend their missile defense system in eastern europe into ukraine. and that would mean that the russian strategic nuclear also would be in dia, trouble. so unless the americans relent and put into writing though, as i said earlier wrong, i don't think i pledge from them in writing would mean anything. but if they do put into writing your credit would not be admitted into the ranks of the western military block. and if they do pull their forces back from eastern europe and the baltic states, then of course, tension will somewhat decrease. but the problem is that in a year from now in 2 years from now, we could be at this position again. that is why decisive action has to be taken by russia, because you, you will come when you kind dos. and so the ranks of

and ukraine is russia's soft underbelly, under no circumstances can the russian government allow ukraine to be nato. often nato forces to be even more widely deployed in the country because of that would pose a most perilous french. so the security or russia to the security of the russian people. and also the americans could extend their missile defense system in eastern europe into ukraine. and that would mean that the russian strategic nuclear arsenal would be in dire trouble. so unless the americans relents and put into right though, as i said the wrong, i don't think i played from them in writing would mean anything. but if they do put into rights and ukraine would not be admitted into the ranks of the west and military block. and if they do pull their forces back from eastern europe and the states, then of course tension will somewhat decrease. but the problem is that in a year from now, in 2 years from now, we could be a decision. again, that is why decisive action has to be taken by russia. because you, i will come when you dos and so the ranks of nature. and by then it just be to

s. troops starting to move into ukraine. however, that being said, if russia intervenes, americans have been cleared enough to respond and interview on the other side. so it seems that the work can be avoided. that being said, that there's always this risk of a miscalculation so affecting the problem if someone wants to have a peace agreement. but they did this, that doesn't seem to be any room for compromise. and in the absence of disagreement, the parents who are my because normally alternative, imp, patrick, think the interesting time. right. i mean that the fact that they're talking ok, the russians have said that big nato has been talking like this for 20 years. ok. the russians want it in writing. i mean, this is something new. it is a bit of a departure from their usual procedures here. i think that's why it's important. the talk is talk, but we want it in writing and we want it to be public and transparent. go ahead, patrick. i think it rushes in a very on a diplomatic position because it's made it's intentioned well

s. troops starting to moving to ukraine. however, that being said, if russia intervenes, the americans have many clear. i'm not gonna respond and intervene on the other side. so it seems that the war can be avoided. that being said, there's always this risk of my miscalculation so i can promise it wrong, runs to have a peace agreement, but they did this. it doesn't seem to be any room for compromise. and in the absence on disagreement, the parents who are my become the only alternative imp, patrick, think the interesting time. right. i mean that the fact that they're talking ok, the russians that have said that big nato has been talking like this for 20 years. ok. the russians want it in writing, i mean, this is something new. it is a bit of a departure from their usual procedures here. i think that's where it's as importantly, talk as talk, but we want it in writing and we want it to be public and transparent. go ahead, patrick. i think it rushes in a very strong diplomatic position because it's made it's intentioned well k

s. troops starting to move into ukraine. however, that being said, if russia intervenes, the americans have been cleared enough to respond and intervene on the other side. so it seems that the war can be avoided. but that being said, that there's always this risk of a miscalculation so affecting the problem if someone wants to have a peace agreement. but they did this, that doesn't seem to be any room for compromise. and in the absence of disagreement, the parents who might become normally alternative, imp, patrick, think the interesting time or, i mean that the fact that they're talking ok, the russians have said that big nato's been talking like this for 20 years. ok. the russians want it in writing. i mean, this is something new. it is a bit of a departure from their usual procedures here. i think that's why it's important. the talk is talk, but we want it in writing. we want it to be public and transparent. go ahead, patrick. i think it rushes in a very on a diplomatic position because it's made it's intentioned well kno

s. troops starting to move in to ukraine. however, that being said, if russia intervenes, the americans have been cleared enough to respond and interview them on the other side. so it seems that the war can be avoided. that being said, there's always this risk of a miscalculation so affecting the problem if someone wants to have a peace agreement, but they did this, that doesn't seem to be any room for compromise. and in the absence of disagreement, the parents who are my become the only alternative imp, patrick, think the interesting time. right? i mean that the fact that they're talking ok, the russians have said that big nato has been talking like this for 20 years. ok. the russians want it in writing. i mean, this is something new. it is a bit of a departure from their usual procedures here. i think that's why it's important. the talk is talk, but we want it in writing. we want it to be public and transparent. go ahead, patrick. i think it rushes in a very on diplomatic position because it's made its intentioned well know

s. troops starting to move in to ukraine. however, that being said, if russia intervenes, the americans have many cleared enough to respond and intervene them on the other side. so it seems that the war can be avoided. that being said, there's always this risk of a miscalculation so affecting the problem if someone wants to have a peace agreement. but they did this, that doesn't seem to be any room for compromise. and in the absence of disagreement in a parents who might become normally alternative, imp, patrick, think the interesting time, right. i mean that the fact that they're talking ok, the russians have said that big nato has been talking like this for 20 years. ok. the russians want it in writing. i mean, this is something new. it is a bit of a departure from their usual procedures here. i think that's why it's important that talk is talk, but we want it in writing. we want it to be public and transparent. go ahead, patrick. i think it rushes in a very on diplomatic position because it's made it's intentioned well kno

s. troops starting to move in to ukraine. however, that being said, if russia intervenes, the americans have many cleared enough to respond and intervene them on the other side. so it seems that the war can be avoided. that being said, there's always this risk of a miscalculation so affecting the problem if someone wants to have a peace agreement. but they did this, that doesn't seem to be any room for compromise. and in the absence of disagreement, the parents who might become normally alternative, imp, patrick, think the interesting time. right. i mean that the fact that they're talking, ok, the russians have said that big nato's been talking like this for 20 years. ok. the russians want it in writing. i mean, this is something new. it is a bit of a departure from their usual procedures here. i think that's why it's important that talk is talk, but we want it in writing. we want it to be public and transparent. go ahead, patrick. i think it rushes in a very on diplomatic position because it's made its intentioned well known

s. troops starting to move into ukraine. however, that being said, if russia intervenes, the american submitting cleared enough to respond and intervene on the other side. so it seems that the work can be avoided. that being said, that there's always this risk of my miscalculation so affecting the problem if someone wants to have a peace agreement, but they did this, that doesn't seem to be any room for compromise. and in the absence of disagreement, the parents who are my become normally alternative, imp, patrick, think the interesting time. right. i mean that the fact that they're talking ok the russian and said that big nato has been talking like this for 20 years. ok. the russians want it in writing. i mean, this is something new. it is a bit of a departure from their usual procedures here. i think that's why it's important that talk is talk, but we want it in writing and we want it to be public and transparent. go ahead, patrick. i think it rushes in a very strong diplomatic position because it's made it's intentioned w

visa be ukraine? go ahead. it's hard to tell because nato's is on the one hand supporting ukraine, giving it up mac it back in giving it to linux baton on the other hand makes it very clear that it's not actually willing to defend it militarily. so we had mr. linton of the other day saying that if a rationalist attack keep crane, the united states would put heavy sanctions on russia. medical sanctions are not a military response. because of course ukraine is not a member of nato. so, on the one hand, the c nato kind of egging ukraine on a little bit and, and lending it support and on the other hand, backing off as well, which is probably no desperately good combination. alexander, i can help get the pulling that nato and particularly the leader of the, of the alliance. the united states wants some kind of military conflict because at the end of the day, this is a entry ukraine conflict that needs to be resolved. and there's actually a roadmap for that. it's called the minsk accords here, which of course western

side these of the ukraine, go ahead. it's hard to tell because nato's is on the one hand supporting ukraine, giving it up, mac it back in giving it to linux, backing on the other hand. makes it very clear that it's not actually willing to defend it militarily. so we had mr. lincoln of the other day saying that if a rationalist attack keep crane the united states will put heavy sanctions on russia. medical sanctions are not a military response because of course ukraine is not a member of later. so on the one hand, e. c, nato, kind of egging ukraine on a lot of burden and lending it support. and on the other hand, backing off as well, which is probably no desperately good combination. alexander, i can help get the feeling that nato, and particularly the leader of the, of the alliance. the united states wants some kind of military conflict because at the end of the day, this is a entry ukraine conflict that needs to be resolved. and there's actually a roadmap for that. it's called the minsk accords here, which of course wes