it worked for him, it worked for harry reid in 2010. he faced a similar tough well-funded appointment -- well-funded opponent and he went all around the vada and said -- nevada and said reelect me and you will keep benefiting from the fact that you have a leader of the senate representing you. host: matthew in new york, democrats line. we are running short on time, so quickly with your comment or question. caller: absolutely not. i don't care what party you represent. this is not a good idea. going back to this idea of earmarks is not good. it is just more corruption waiting in the wings. get rid of the big money, out of the super pac's, get rid of it all. going back is not a good idea. we should be a progressive nation. come up with better ideas. the corruption has got to go. host: that is met in new york. -- matt in new york. guest: that is an understandable view that a lot of conservatives and liberals will have. this was a practice that at times went sideways a while ago, and i know there are a lot of people that think that this is

but i heard harry reid say the most remarkable thing is they followed it. they did. have guns or riots. or stone throwing and i then say to say i did the stanford students i was talking to and said i know when i say that at least 20% maybe 30% of you. are thinking well too bad. there were a few riots. too bad there weren't a few stones thrown and so forth. i said before you come to that conclusion. i would like you. to look on television or elsewhere of what happens in places and times in countries where they decide there are differences that way. because rule the rule of law is not an absolute. and it is only one small part. of this country's values embedded in this document the constitution, but it is an important part. and that's all that's all i want them to do. it's called comparison and i believe though i'm biased because i'm a judge perhaps on biased. i don't think so. i believe that it is important for us. to maintain that respect for a rule of law that ever since andrew jackson refused. to carry out john marsh's opinion saying northern georgia belongs to che

a lot about judicial philosophies in 2013 harry reid broke senate rules to change senate rules to set the threshold for confirmation at 51. i said at the time you may be sorry you did this. neither of those moves played out as colleagues intended neither did the disgraceful firestorm that would visit upon justice thomas and jenny back in 1991. i'm not going to dwell on that episode tonight. there's no reason to we all know what the people behind the smear campaign revealed actually about themselves. but i'll say this i was inspired then and i'm still inspired today by the courage. the resilience in the faith with justice thomas endured those months and emerged with an appetite for service. still intact the very same grit that carried clarence through pinpoint. and savannah the same stubborn faithfulness that led him ultimately to keep faith. in both his church and his country even after they both let him down. in ugly ways as a young like man the same commitment to principle that compelled clarence to blaze and uncomfortable trail in washington. disrupting everybody's expectations all

reid took the position to get rid of the filibuster for those nominees. that meant as soon as we have the obstruction thatlie talked about wherehe decision was taken that even though there was nearly a year left in his term, president obama's pick for antonin scalia a's vacancy was going to get neither hearing or even courtesy meetings from republican senators. and once that obstruction happened, democrats filibuster the nominee. they just got rid of the filibuster. and that is the world we now live in. you can get a supreme court justice seed with a fair minority of votes. that is what elie is describing is likely to happen. i think the thing that is really remarkable about the biden administration and gets not nearly enough attention is his salute zealous commitment, not just to getting judges under the federal bench, breaking numbers, doing it so quickly, and really this has been important -- again, i don't think we understand how important. he has been from day one committed to putting judges on the federal bench who are not just diverse, extraordinar

california attorney general kamala harris. and federal judge childs childs, a university of south carolina law school graduate backed by the state's senior congressman jim clyburn who said a non-ivy league background would be refreshing. >> i am very very concerned that we take on this elitest kind of atmosphere when we pretend that the only way you can demonstrate a list of qualifications is to go to certain school. >> reporter: celebrating justice breyer today the president reminisced about sharing his confirmation hearing in 1994, saying he had high hopes then. >> and he's exceeded those hopes in every possible way. >> reporter: breyer said he's stepping down, optimistic about the future of what he called "the american experiment." >> my grandchildren and their children, they'll determine whether the experiment still works and, of course, i'm an optimist and i'm pretty sure it will. >> reporter: so once the president makes his pick, the democratic-crold senate is vowing to confirm her barring any urn foreseen circumstance.

reid took the position to get rid of the filuster for those nominees. that meant as soon as we have the obstruction thatlie talked about where the decision was taken that even though there was nearly a year left in his term, president obama's pick for antonin scalia a's vacancy was going to get neither hearing or even courtesy meetings from republicanenators. and once that obstruction happened, democrats filibuster the nominee. they just got rid of the filibuster. and that is the world we now live in. you can get a supreme court justice seed with a fair minority of votes. that is what elie is describing is likely to happen. i think the thing that is really remarkable about the biden administration and gets not nearly enough attention is his salute zealous commitment, not just to getting judges under the federal bench, breaking numbers, doing it so quickly, and really this has been important -- again, i don't think we understand how important. he has been from day one committed to putting judges on the federal bench who are not just diverse, extraordinar

and if you look at harry reid pressed take comments from years past, they would've been outraged, the 90s version of the former democratic leadership would've never signed up on this . i don't know what's going on here. this is not a pro- american agenda. >> it just shows that we can't trust this administration. they're not being transparent with us. cards are being told by our they hiding all this. they don't want you to know. they are saying you were footing the bill. you have to follow the law and if you don't you are locked up or get slapped a fine and whatnot and if they break the law, you are allowed in and you have to pay for it. >> it's like the contractor told the cop, i'm working for the federal government and ultimately that is -- speaking of that, kamala harris in the last 90 minutes or so was that joint base andrew. undoubtably they will talk about her big job, which is root causes of migration to the united states people to get anything done? i don't know if i would hold my breath. >> the us is ramping up threats between russia and ukraine. will blight didn't blink in de

that was changed by harry reid when he was just passed away when he was majority leader. it was unclear for a time whether it applied to the supreme court, but it does. that's why when i was talking in the last segment about the president thanking and democrats thanking the people of georgia, it's because that is what gave democrats the gavel. not only the votes, even though they don't even have one to spare, but the gavel. so what mitch mcconnell did during the obama administration in saying that garland wasn't going to get a hearing, he can't do that now because the democrats control the schedule. that is one of the most important things to keep in mind. they can get whomever the nominee is a hearing and they can get it on the floor and get the votes because you don't need a super majority. one other thing i want to point out here is that in the slew of statements that we've been getting about the reaction to justice breyer's retirement, one of the most interesting i thought was from senator graham. a long time member republican, obviously member of the judiciary commit

>> that whole process started with senator harry reid, late senator reed, from nevada. and that's what held the door to that nuclear option. and that could change the dynamic. that's the fight that would try to change it for voting rights and it did not pass because as i mentioned, and the number is 50 plus one. so they have the numbers, but in this case they expect them to go pretty bold but as far as ideologically, i think you would see someone a little bit more to the left. >> harris: bret baier, thank you so much. let's light in with shannon bream. jonathan turley i was mentioning because he was here this afternoon with breaking news were outnumbered. people who lead sometimes get lost in the fray and we are so focused on the people who potentially could be on the short-list coming in immediately, we kind of glossed over the person who is leaving. what can you tell us about stephen breyer? the u.s. supreme court justice, a man, and how he has fit into this court. and what footprints he leaves behind. >> i can tell you personally he's a very congenial guy and he does

reid international airport. so certainly appreciate the central role that aviation place in the economy of las vegas and nevada. with regard to the aviation consumer protection role, it's been a major focus of my time as deputy general counsel. right now serving addressing the concerns we are hearing from the wave of complaints related to recalls. so ensuring where addressing those complaints, ensuring that we are pushing through with the 18 active investigations we have related to the failure for recalls. looking at some of the rulemaking discussed by chair cantwell this morning, and ensuring that we're really looking forward to making sure that consumers have the right information and are protected correctly by the airlines. in addition, on the safety front, working with the federal aviation administration to ensure that the safety related rules our top priority for the department and we do everything we can to support those efforts. >> thank you. i appreciate it. see my time is just about up so i have a quest

. >> david, i am trying to imagine a barack obama and harry reid dynamic like that ahead of the 2010 midterms. i cannot get my head around it. but could this dynamic hurt republicans in november and can the dems capitalize on this seeming split between donald and mitch? >> it should, mehdi, and i am interested to hear bill's take on this. it's like, hey pal, you are going to have historic numbers of people voting by mail, including some of your folks. so let's fast forward into september and october as people begin to vote, especially towards election day. republicans are going to need a lot of voters who might have just shown up for the first time with trump, reliable voters. the message they are hearing is, why would you show up to help give mitch mcconnell the senate? he is a traitor. trump has also taken any number of barbs at mccarthy. marjorie taylor greene is not going to support mccarthy. the question is, would you get dems with that? there are some republicans running smart groups that may make sure they make a get an effort to get in front of republicans on this with ads. b

. >> david, i am trying to imagine a barack obama harry reid dynamic ahead of the 2010 midterms. i cannot get my head around it. but could this dynamic hurt republicans in november and can the games capitalize on this seeming split between donald and mitch? >> it should, mehdi and i am interested to hear bill's take on this. it's like, hey pal, you are going to have historic numbers of people voting by mail, including some of your folks. so let's fast forward into september and october as people begin to vote, especially towards election day. republicans are going to need a lot of voters who might have just shown up for the first time with trump, reliable voters. the message they are hearing is, why would you show up to help give mitch mcconnell the senate? he is a traitor. trump has also taken any number of barbs at mccarthy. marjorie taylor greene is not going to support mccarthy. the question is, would get guns with that? there are some republicans running smart groups that may make sure they make a get in front effort with ads. but you need the support of a lot of unreliable

woman: i'm going to support harry reid. woman 2: senator paul laxalt will be retiring at the end of this term. laxalt: i've done my political bit, and that's it for me. [lively tune playing] reid: i'veever taken my good fortune for granted. there's one other thing i've never taken for granted, and that's you. [rousing music pys] tom brokaw: there were enough vos to bring about a fundamental shift of power in washington. in nevada, congressman harry reid was a giant killer, winning the senate seat of president reagan's close friend, paul laxalt, now retired. christensen: it's election night, harry reid has won the senate seat. big celebration lots of reporters around microphones getting stuck in his face. one reporter asks him, "what's the most important thing you're going to work on?" reid: i said, "water." now frankly, at that time, i didn't know what i was talking about. man: from a staff perspective, one of the things i really appreciated about him is his sort of decisiveness. he would make a decision, and then you would

of course that simply followed what the former senate democratic leader harry reid did in 2013 on the executive calendar. that happened in february or march -- this is 2017. this letter was written in april of 2017. but if there's no more extended debate on this question -- i would invite the senator from virginia, through the chair. mr. kaine: mr. president, if i might respond. senator cotton, what angus said and i'm so glad senator lankford stayed in the room because you said we changed our position. i'm glad you put it up, because others were saying that without it. we are united in our determination to preserve the ability of noams engage in extended debate when bills are on the senate floof. we couldn't even debate this bill. you guys wouldn't let us. you kept using the 60-vote block on the motion to proceed so we couldn't get on the bill. in the five years since 2017, many of us have come to realize this is what we want, but the current abuse of senate rules is blocking us from having discussions about voting rights or about matters that you think are important. this is -- this

woman: i'm going to support harry reid. woman 2: senator paul laxalt will be retiring at the end of this term. laxalt: i've done my political bit, and that's it for me. [lively tune playing] reid: i'veever taken my good fortune for granted. there's one other thing i've never taken for granted, and that's you. [rousing music pys] tom brokaw: there were enough vos to bring about a fundamental shift of power in washington. in nevada, congressman harry reid was a giant killer, winning the senate seat of president reagan's close friend, paul laxalt, now retired. christensen: it's election night, harry reid has won the senate seat. big celebration, lots of reporters around, microphones getting stuck in his face. one reporter asks him, "what's the most important thing you're going to work on?" reid: i said, "water." now, frankly, at that time, i didn't know what i was talking about. man: from a staff perspective, one of the things i really appreciated about him is his sort of decisiveness. he would make a decision, and then you wo

woman: i'm going to support harry reid. woman 2: senator paul laxalt will be retiring at the end of this term. laxalt: i've done my political bit, and that's it for me. [lively tune playing] reid: i've never takeny good fortune for granted. there's one other thing i've never taken for granted, and that's you. [rousing music pys] tom brokaw: there were enough vos to bring about a fundamental shift of power in washington. in nevada, congressman harry reid was a giant killer, winning the senate seat of president reagan's close friend, paul laxalt, now retired. christensen: it's election night, harry reid has won the senate seat. big celebration, lots of reporters around, microphones getting stuck in his face. one reporter asks him, "what's the most important thing you're going to work on?" reid: i said, "water." now, frankly, at that time, i didn't know what i was talking about. man: from a staff perspective, one of the things i really appreciated about him is his sort of decisiveness. he would make a decision, and then you wo

reid and followed up by then-majority leader mitch mcconnell. if that's not the best indicator of what will happen to this body, nothing is. remember when senator reid said we're just going to carve out a little bit of the executive calendar to make it easier for district judges to get elected. that's all we're going to do. why on earth does anybody believe that that carve-out wasn't going to result in the ultimate nuclear option for the executive calendar? that's why you have justice gorsuch, justice kavanaugh, and justice barrett. that's why you have them. it's through political physics here. for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. and if you vote to nuke the legislative filibuster, you might as as well build a wall straight down this body. because any time democrats or republicans hit the trifecta and we have the white house and we have the senate and we have the house, the minority's voice will count for nothing. and even worse, the voices of the vocal minority at either end of the political spectrum will have a disproporti

woman: i'm going to support harry reid. woman 2: senator paul laxalt will be retiring at the end of this term. laxalt: i've done my political bit, and that's it for me. [lively tune playing] reid: i've never taken mgood fortune for granted. there's one other thing i've never taken for granted, and that's you. [rousing music pla] tom brokaw: there were enough voteto bring about a fundamental shift of power in washington. in nevada, congressman harry reid was a giant killer, winning the senate seat of president reagan's close friend, paul laxalt, now retired. christensen: it's election night, harry reid has won the senate seat. big celebration, lots of reporters around, microphones getting stuck in his face. one reporter asks him, "what's the most important thing you're going to work on?" reid: i said, "water." now, frankly, at that time, i didn't know what i was talking about. man: from a staff perspective, one of the things i really appreciated about him is his sort of decisiveness. he would make a decision, and then you wo

that's what your experience has been i'm sure as an aide to harry reid. >> absolutely. this is the nature of our polarized environment right now not to bring it back to the filibuster but it blocks anything the majority wants to accomplish. it never was supposed to be this way but that's the senate we have now. that's what republicans can be counted on to do for the remainder of president biden's term and the flip side of this, though, is that if donald trump were ever to come back to power or republican president come back to power, they would accomplish a lot. i mean, they can't articulate an agenda because they don't want to say what it would be because the things they seek to do are deeply unpopular. republicans want to give more tax cuts to the wealthy, they want to confirm super conservative judges and end women's right to choose and they want to enact massive voter suppression laws and cotfy trump's big lie but they can't say that out loud. the only thing they can do is obstruct and hope voters don't notice anything they want to accomplish. >> yeah, john said out

now the guy, again, who told people romney was going to put them back in chains who harry reid went on the senate floor and accused them basically financial crimes. lying on his tax returns. now mitt romney is some kind of, you know, hero? he beat find saint hood. show some dignity on the left once in a while. >> pete: yeah, we were told we might see joe 2.0. man, if that is joe 2.0, the white house has got some serious problems tonight. dan bongino, thank you very much. appreciate your time. >> thanks, buddy. >> pete: all right, well, tonight, as you may have noticed, our back drop looks a bit different. we are live from the greater richmond convention center in downtown richmond, virginia where tomorrow morning starting at 9:00 a.m. eastern time we will be live on fox nation for the miseducation of "america live" summit. i released five part series miseducation of america fox nation. tomorrow on the stage you are looking at right there. we host a live summit that will amplify that steer series and further expose and dissect the 100 year progressive takeover of our classrooms as well

of course that simply followed what the former senate democratic leader harry reid did in 2013 on the executive calendar. that happened in february or march -- this is 2017. this letter was written in april of 2017. but if there's no more extended debate on this question -- i would invite the senator from virginia, through the chair. mr. kaine: mr. president, if i might respond. senator cotton, what angus said and i'm so glad senator lankford stayed in the room because you said we changed our position. i'm glad you put it up, because others were saying that without it. we are united in our determination to preserve the ability of noams engage in extended debate when bills are on the senate floof. we couldn't even debate this bill. you guys wouldn't let us. you kept using the 60-vote block on the motion to proceed so we couldn't get on the bill. in the five years since 2017, many of us have come to realize this is what we want, but the current abuse of senate rules is blocking us from having discussions about voting rights or about matters that you think are important. this is -- this

reid; and brian darling, senior advisor to navigators global, a conservative communications firm, and former adviser to republican senator rand paul. gentlemen, thank you. let me just jump right into this fornt debate, 5d and-- adam, why should the filibuster change. >> the filibuster lisa as you said has changed a lot over the years. and in today's senate has come from what most americans think of when they think of the filibuster, perhaps jimmy stewart standing on the senate floor giving a long speech into a more refined tool of obstruction that allows a minority of senators who who may represent as little as a quarter of the population to block the majority from acting on centrist, common sense policy. so if the filibuster ever served a useful purpose, it has mutated far beyond what the framers ever envisioned and become a tool purely for obstruction. that is what you are skiing in the senate today and why it needs to be reformed or gotten rid of all together. >> to adam's point there, the filibuster, the supermajority is no not in the constitution. why should it stand. >> the sena

reid; and brian darling, senior advisor to navigators global, a conservative communications firm, and former adviser to republican senator rand paul. gentlemen, thank you. let me just jump right into this fornt debate, 5d and-- adam, why should the filibuster change. >> the filibuster lisa as you said has changed a lot over the years. and in today's senate has come from what most americans think of when they think of the filibuster, perhaps jimmy stewart standing on the senate floor giving a long speech into a more refined tool of obstruction that allows a minority of senators who who may represent as little as a quarter of the population to block the majority from acting on centrist, common sense policy. so if the filibuster ever served a useful purpose, it has mutated far beyond what the framers ever envisionednd become a tool purely for obstruction. that is what you are skiing in the senate today and why it needs to be reformed or gotten rid of all together. >> to adam's point there, the filibuster, the supermajority is no not in the constitution. why should it stand. >> the senate

to watch the rest of harry reid's interview and to find other programs featuring the late senator visit book tv.org and use the search box at the top of the page. on a recent episode of our author interview program afterwards journalist. lizzie johnson discussed her new book paradise, which looks at the root causes of california's 2018 campfire. she was interviewed by terry baker ceo of the society of american foresters. here's a portion of their discussion. so i think there were decades of decision-making that went into play where people were planning for the fires that they had known in the past and those fires never burned all the way through town. they were always stopped and so with that came a false sense of security and so, you know, there were decisions they could have made that would have again, it's like impossible to know without looking in a crystal ball, but it seems like they would have made the evacuation efforts during the campfire a little easier and a little smoother. but again, you know, they had these other concerns to look at too and i think paradise is just so embl

to watch the rest of harry reid's interview and to find other programs featuring the late senator visit book tv.org and use the search box at the top of the page. weekends on c-span 2 are an intellectual feast every saturday american history tv documents america's story and on sundays book tv brings you the latest in nonfiction books and authors funding for c-span 2 comes from these television companies and more including cox. cox is committed to providing eligible families access to affordable internet through the connect to compete program bridging the digital divide one connected and engaged student at a time cox bringing us closer cox along with these television companies support c-span, 2 as a public service. seeking educational excellence executive director charles love recently argued that black lives matter and the 1619 project are a danger to the future of american democracy. the cincy 1619 project was founded to reimagine the founding of america. framing it around when the first black africans were brought here slaves. and what they say is slavery and anti-black racism is ende

that was harry reid to a t. if you were lucky enough someone carried about and called his friend, he cared with you with every fiber in his being. the generosity extended far beyond things sartorial. a few years ago harry called up my wife and told her i sent you and chuck a special gift. the greatest thing. you are going to love it. it's a month's subscription to netflix . i didn't have -- iris didn't have the heart to tell him we subscribed for four years already. clearly harry wasn't big on new technology. he didn't text. he didn't mail. and as you know, whenever he called you he hung up so quickly you would think he was allergic to telecommunications. what harry was allergic to was the artifice of politics that he considered a distraction from his two passion. getting good things done in this capitol. harry never forgot where he came from. nor did he forget the people. his childhood friends and neighbors who just like harry early on struggled to get by. he kept up with so many of them. we remember hearing al

so joy reid plays our interview when it supports our stance and the rest of the time pretends all of fox news is pushing some party line. >>> kamala harris' communications director is an msnbc cricketer who's getting her own -- contributor who's getting her own show. notice how no one even raises a peep when it's msnbc. sanders says she's willing to deal with criticism of her former bosses. we'll see about that. >>> ruth shelley barrett whose argue was retracted by the atlantic is suing the magazine for smearing her for $1 million. and yet barrett, who is accused of serial plagiarism back in the '90s, admits that she lied about one thing, invent ising a nonexistent son for the mother in the piece to protect her source. the atlantic rejects her ales saying -- allegations saying why would she go to court over a story that's been such a disgrace? that's it for this edition of "mediabuzz." i'm howard kurtz. we hope you'll check us out on facebook and twitter and take a look at my podcast -- a listen, i guess you should say -- media buzz meter. you can get it at apple eye itunes and on --

senator harry reid said in a 2008 interview that as long as he was the senate majority leader the nuclear option would never happen under his watch. "as long as i am the leader, the answer is no." he said, "i think we should just forget that. that is a black chapter in the history of the senate. i hope we never, ever get to do that again because i really do believe it will ruin our country."he was talking about 2005 when this side of the isle was the majority and we were going to change, there was an effort that we were able to diffuse in order to do exactly what we did today. in 2008, the majority leader said, we rallied against republicans who fought for the measure, saying it would lead to a unicameral legislature and it was purposely set up by the founding fathers to have different rules than the house of representatives. such a measure like the nuclear option would "change our country forever." and i am sorry to say, i agree with him.i agree with what he said in 2008. yet on thursday, on a nearly partyline vote, the democrats abruptly changed the senate balance of power. so here is t

. >> in 2013, senate majority leader harry reid pushed through historic changes to rules to make it easier to approve former president obama's nominees. many reduced -- voted to reduce the threshold to 51 votes for approval of judicial nominees. through democrats voted against changing the rules including senator joe manchin. chuck schumer will bring a voting rights of measure to the floor. they plan to change senate filibuster rules to make a simple majority rather than the 60 votes needed. here is a look back at the bill before and after the bill took place -- vote took place. the american people believe the senate is broken. and i believe the american people are right. during this congress, the 113th congress, the united states has wasted an unprecedented amount of time on procedural hurdles and partisan obstruction. the work of this country goes undone. congress should be passing legislation that strengthens our economy, protects american families. instead, we are burning

in 2013, then sent leader harry reid pushed forward a change to senate rules made easier to approve president obama's nominees. to reduce the threshold from 60 votes to 51 votes for senate approval of judicial nominees. back in 2013, 3 democrats voted against changing rules, including senator joe manchin. on tuesday, current senate majority leader chuck schumer will bring a voting rights package to the floor. here's a look back at the senate filibuster debate in 2013, before and after the book took place. >> the american people believe congress is broken. the american people believe the senate is broken. i believe the american people are right. during this congress, the united states has wasted an unprecedented amount of time on procedural -- and person destruction. obstruction. the

. >> in 2013, then senate majority leader harry reid pushed through a historic change to senate rules, but made it easier to approve former president obama's nominees. 52 senate democrats and independents voted to reduce the threshold from 60 votes to 51 votes for senate approval of judicial nominees. back in 2013, three democrats voted against changing the rules, including senator joe manchin. chuck schumer will bring a voting rights measure to the floor. he plans on trying to change senate filibuster rules to allow the voting package to move forward with a simple majority rather than the 60 votes needed to bring it to the floor. here is a look back at the senate filibuster debate in 2013 before and after the vote took place. sen. reid: the american people believe congress is broken. the american people believe the senate is broken. and i believe the american people are right. during this congress, the 113th congress, the united states has wasted an unprecedented amount of time on procedural hurdles and partisan obstruction. the work of this country goes undone. congress should be pa

reid erie later, the u.s. capitol police chief testifies on changes made to capital security. >> up next, a discussion on voting rights with martin luther king iii, eldest son of the late civil rights leader. hosted by "the washington post," this runs half an hour. jonathan: welcome to "washington post live" and another in our series on race and american. this is a weekend when we as a nation celebrate dr. martin luther king jr.. but the civil work of that great man remains undone. his eldest son is using the holiday to focus on voting rights, with action in arizona tomorrow the birthday of martin luther king, and here in washington on monday, the holiday. joining me now is martin luther king iii, chairman of the drum major institute. welcome to "washington post live." martin: thank you. jonathan: i saw you maybe a couple of weeks ago. let's talk about a tweet to put out an hour ago. you twisted, until our freedom to vote is secure, we don't see progress on issues that matter most to us, abortion access, gun v

. >> harry reid made the world a better place. >> i will not support separate actions that worsen the underlying disease of division. >> we need some good rules changes and we can do that together. >> stacey abrams has a scheduling event. her car is getting a tune-up. you can understand. >> when he stands at the damn podium at the white house without a mask. >> does this look stupid? >> the king of rock and roll. [cheers] >> bret: go dogs. georgia bulldogs 41 years in the making. monday on "special report" after a year in office is president biden delivering on his promises? we will take a look at his foreign policy and domestic agendas and please tune in to "fox news sunday" john roberts will have glenn youngkin in his first interview to after being sworn in saturday as virginia governor. thanks for inviting us into your home tonight, that's it for "special report" fair balanced and unafraid. "fox news primetime" hosted this week by rachel campos-duffy starts right now. hey, rachel. >> rachel: hi, bret. thanks so much. >> good evening and welcome to "fox news primetime." i'm rachel c

reid erie later, the u.s. capitol police chief testifies on changes made to capital security. >> up next, a discussion on voting rights with martin luther king iii, eldest son of the late civil rights leader. hosted by "the washington post," this runs half an hour. jonathan: welcome to "washington post live" and another in our series on race and american. this is a weekend when we as a nation celebrate dr. martin luther king jr.. but the civil work of that great man remains undone. his eldest son is using the holiday to focus on voting rights, with action in arizona

practically speaking, though, because we are not going to get to ask her that, when harry reid ended the 60 vote tlesh followed for judicial nominees in 2013 republicans then used that as a pretext for ending the 60-vote threshold for supreme court nominees four years later. so i want to share what mitt romney said might happen if you end the filibuster now. >> there's also a reasonable chance republicans will win both houses in congress and that donald trump himself could once again be elected president in 2024. have democrats thought what would it mean for them, for the democrat minority to have no power whatsoever? >> what do you think about that? >> i don't believe that it will create the terrible consequences because i believe a lot of the things we're talking about are popular. i don't believe mitt romney himself if we passed voting rights act would vote to repeal that. i think there are senators like susan collins who would vote to repeal that. when you have fundamental legislation that is good and just repealing that becomes difficult. we saw the republicans couldn't repeal e