scott peterson, is what we're seeing here the beginning of a shift back to nuclear power production, and is it a good thing? >> well, i think it's not the beginning. it's a continuation of a shift in terms of looking at nuclear energy differently that's been happening now for a couple of years, particularly in congress, where you have tremendous bipartisan support now behind the idea that if we're going to meet the country's electricity needs, if we're going to look at producing electricity cleanly and using as much low-carbon power sources as we can, and if we really want to stimulate the economy and add jobs right here in america, and really take the lead in exporting technology as the president said, then we need nuclear power as a component of a large portfolio of clean options that include renewables, that include efficiency. but we need to have the large-scale sources of nuclear-- of energy like nuclear power. already today, we have 104 reactors that produce 20% of this nation's power. but importantly, it produces 70% of all the carbon-free electricity. so we're a major player