and that air bombing is hezbollah. >> frankly i don't buy the whole line about hezbollah being a hundred percent a terrist organization. just as i don't buy the line that all israelis ae, you know, trying to kill palestinians and steal our land. >> what is hezbollah is the only provider of social and health services in southern lebanon to the oppressed. when they defend arab land against invaders, they hold a special place. >> hezbollah is part of lebanon. one-third of the lebanese people. this is not something that bunch of terrorists running around as don or someone else would like to portray. this is is not the case. the case that hezbollah is the most popular party right now in the middle east, in the arab and muslim world. >> probably in dearborn, those segments of the community that rally behind hezbollah are rallying behind the group that says israel has no right to exist; that jews are akin to monkeys and apes; that they have a particular version of islam in which the jews are viewed in derogatory terms. and that's not a basis, especially in america where we have assumption about

. >> hezbollah is a model of tolerance? one thinks so. stay tunedf@@????????? aren't you sick of these airline credit cards that advertise flights for 25,000 miles? but when you call... let me check. oh fud, nothing without a big miles upcharge. it's either pay their miles upcharges or connect through mooseneck! [ freezing ] i can't feel my feet. we switched to the venture card from capital one -- so no more games. let's go see those grandkids. [ male announcer ] don't pay miles upcharges. don't play games. get the flight you want with the venture card at capitalone.com. [ lovinit ] help! what's in your llet? >> announcer: here's a special free offer for men who are losing their hair. >> my hair always looks great, and i feel great. >> if you want to look better and if you want to feel better about yourself, hair club is the way to go. >> announcer: men, you know that getting your hair back will make you look good and improve your self-confidence like no diet or exercise program. it's a proven fact that having a thicker, fuller head of hair makes you look and

. >> the last major war was in 2006 between israel and hezbollah. the militia is still a force in southern lebanon. it says it will get involved in future fighting. >> hezbollah is in a position to protect the country. our lebanese army is not fully equipped and capable of defending our land. >> hezbollah will enter the next time? >> yes, this is the decision. >> such threats underlie the delicate nature of keeping the peace and need to demarcate the border once and for all. >> an australian cycled around europe missing -- looking for his missing son will be reunited. he quit his job as a fireman to search for his son. the boy was abducted by his mother in 2008. >> he cycled more than 3,000 miles across nine countries. the image of his missing son printed across his clothing. now this journey and search have come to an end. earlier this week he got an anonymous e-mail telling him the boy had been tracked down. >> i had been cycling between nuremberg and stuttgart. there was an e-mail from someone identified. it simply said, andrew has been found. au

. >> hezbollah is a model of tolerance? one thinks so. one thinks so. stay tuned.ok, she's gas. he's constipation... and our special fiber helps our prootics so that you can show those symptoms who's in charge. this isn't even my floor. [ elevator bell dings ] this isn't even got the gecko t-shirt... on is "4 million drivers switched!" gecko water bottle... notebook... chamois... gecko: sir, i feel a little bit uncomfortable with all... you know... with all this. i mean, it's not about me. should be about how geico's the third-largest car insurance company in the nation. things like that. boss: oh, of course! we're not gonna get carried away. gecko: uh...yeah... all right as long as we don't overdo it. vo: geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. activia is better than ever! hey, you guys. want to try activia's great new taste? isn't this the yogurt that, you know... helps regulate your digestive system. ooh, i think i'll pass. no, no, no! trust me. it is beyond tasty. mmm! wow! i can't believe it, i love it! mmm, this is really good! new b

. >> the last major war in the area was in 2006 between israel and hezbollah. the militia is still a force in southern lebanon, and it says it will get involved in future fighting. >> lebanon is in a position to protect the country. our lebanese army is not fully equipped and capable of defending our land. >> hezbollah will intervene next time? >> yes, this is a decision. >> such threats underline the delicate nature of keeping the peace and the need to mark the border once and for all. >> in -- and australia who cycled around europe looking for his missing son looks like he will be reunited. he quit his job as a fireman to search for his 6-year-old. the boy was abducted by his mother in 2008. >> he cycled more than 3,000 miles across nine countries. the image of his son printed across his clothing, but his surge has come to an end. earlier this week he got an anonymous e-mail telling him his son had been tracked down. >> i have been cycling between nuremberg and [unintelligible] i checked my e-mails and there was an e-mail from somebody who was unidentified. i

hamas and hezbollah are in their own territories. mr. tony blair should be put on trial and on top of that he thinks he should have... take a statement? of course he wants to sew the seeds of discourse to sell more arms. mr. tony blair held mr. bush's hand and said a lie that there are weapons of mass destruction in iraq and allowed the united states to enter into a dead look to lead to the death of both american troops as well as the iraqi people and the... basically created instability in the region. on top of that. mr. blair's statements should now be considered as a real statement and taken seriously? this is what we object to. we think that those who go to iraq and create a war that leads to the death and casualty of over one million people, where are they? if they are put on trial once, nobody would dare do these mistakes again. >> rose: okay. i want to.... >> ( translated ): allow me. allow me. allow me. last year i told you something, i'd like to repeat it. i'd like to repeat it every five years that i've seen you, i think. you s

the same attempt was to isolate hezbollah, though hezbollah is not an important product of the produce of lebanese shi'a. >> rose: but you have influence in lebanon, too. >> well, now the government of prime minister hariri is a coalition government with hezbollah sitting in and lebanon is much better off than if you take a course of isolation you don't normally get the better results. >> rose: so how can the united states engage with iran? >> diplomats are paid with this. you have to be creative. >> rose: give them some freed a vice. >> well t united states is very creative in trying to keep in one piece the palestinian negotiations. one piece of that would resolve many problems. >> rose: are you optimistic about the israeli/palestinian at this point? >> i cannot say yes because being optimistic means it depends on you and you would influence things. we are trying to influence things. when negotiations started we all welcomed this. and we want negotiations to continue. >> rose: thank you very much. i always look forward to these conversations and i appreciate you taking the time in a

worry about iran when it hasn't attacked anyone in my point is that iran has attacked via hamas via hezbollah via terrorist attacks at khobar towers and elsewhere and so that is why the international community especially u.n. security council says if iran is willing to use force in those ways what would happen if iran acquires nuclear weapons the security council way in the rooms where there's an amount to the point where even action and i can just finish a concern that and then saudi arabia had nothing to do with iran what happened in lebanon has to do with elaborate lebanese sovereignty and what is happening in palestine is that the zionist regime which is a racist an apartheid by the welshman's going to run their own superior race no the weapons come from the united states when gaza is bombed and thousands of civilians are murdered in the gaza war they come from the united states when it when you compare the number of palestinians who've been killed to the number of israelis have been killed. here around the world we have to jump in here with after a short break we'll continue our discussi

its airplanes go over lebanese airspace and israelis can constantly provoke the people of lebanon hezbollah has succeeded in expelled you can see that these regimes drama still people territory. no the iranian support groups that helped to liberate their own country which is called lebanon and beyond that the iranians were the victims of a war that the americans and the europeans were behind it they supported saddam hussein they gave him weapons of mass destruction i myself was a victim of two chemical attacks and friends of mine have died as a result of chemical attacks people even now are dying as a result of the chemical attacks that took place in the one thousand nine hundred i think it is a bit rich for anyone to say that the iranians here are the grassers or they're the threat a threat to world peace the iranians they are the ones who should be listened to and it is the united states and the europeans who should apologize to the iranian people for the suffering that they made them go through ok you want to reply to that i think we are in your own mind you want to reply because you had

worry about iran when it hasn't attacked anyone in my point is that iran has attacked via hamas via hezbollah via terrorist attacks at khobar towers and elsewhere and so that is why the international community especially u.n. security council says if iran is willing to use force in those ways what would happen if iran acquires nuclear weapons security council way in the rooms where there's an amount to the point where even action if i can just finish that is a concern and when that happened then saudi arabia had nothing to do with iran what happened in lebanon has to do with lebron lebanese sovereignty and what is happening in palestine is that the zionist regime which is a racist an apartheid i don't want to sit around and superior race you know the weapons come from the united states when gaza is bombed and thousands of civilians are murdered in the gaza war they come from the united states when it when you compare the number of palestinians who've been killed to the number of israelis have been killed. here around the world we have to jump in here with after a short break we'll continue ou

syria supplying hezbollah. iran supplying hezbollah and iran going nuclear. >> yeah, the world is short of perfect. i spent time with the russian minister of defense as well with prime minister putin. tried to convince them not to send those weapons to the russians, they are now sending extremely effective -- weapon with the dyament shuns of russia just -- with the men shuns of russia when you put it in the medicine ter -- mediterranean it is a weapon that can reach anyone, even your vessels coming to the eastern part of it. we tried to convince them until now we failed. i hope they will reconsider it. they also provide them with the best most advanced anti-aircraft missile systems. we hope they will consider these as well. >> greta: in terms of the peace process, the freeze on settlements that's been the 10 month moratorium ends within a week or so what can you tell me is the latest on that? >> it is not easy. for us it sounds bizarre to consider stretching it, because we basically did it as an unprecedented g

its airplanes go over lebanese airspace and israelis can constantly provoke the people of lebanon hezbollah has succeeded in expelling you can see that is. still people territory. no the iranian support groups that helped to liberate their own country which is called lebanon and beyond that the iranians were the victims of a war that the americans and the europeans were behind it they supported saddam hussein they gave him weapons of mass destruction i myself was a victim of two chemical attacks and friends of mine have died as a result of chemical attacks people even now are dying as a result of the chemical attacks that took place in the one nine hundred eighty so i think it is a bit rich for anyone to say that the iranians here are the aggressors or they're the threat a threat to world peace the iranians they are the ones who should be listened to and it is the united states and the europeans who should apologize to the iranian people for the suffering that they made them go through ok you want to reply to that i think we are in your own mind you want to reply because you had a comment a

worry about iran when it hasn't attacked anyone in my point is that iran has attacked via hamas via hezbollah via terrorist attacks at khobar towers and elsewhere and so that is why the international community especially u.n. security council says if iran is willing to use force in those ways what would happen if iran acquires nuclear weapons the security council way and the israelis as a man should appoint larry imagine if i can just finish a concern and when that happened then saudi arabia had nothing to do with iran what happened in lebanon has to do with elaborate lebanese sovereignty and what is happening in palestine is that the zionist regime which is a racist an apartheid of the western is going to run their own superior race no the weapons come from the united states when gaza is bombed and thousands of civilians are murdered in the gaza war they come from the united states when when you compare the number of palestinians who've been killed to the number of israelis have been killed. here around the world we have to jump in here to after a short break we'll continue our discussion on

its airplanes go over lebanese airspace and the israelis can constantly provoke the people of lebanon hezbollah has succeeded in expelled you can see that israel in this drama still people territory. no the iranian support groups that helped to liberate their own country which is called lebanon and beyond that the iranians were the victims of a war that the americans and the europeans were behind it they supported saddam hussein they gave him weapons of mass destruction i myself was a victim of two chemical attacks and friends of mine have died as a result of chemical attacks people even now are dying as a result of the chemical attacks that took place in the one thousand nine hundred think it is a bit rich for anyone to say that the iranians here are the grassers or they're the threat a threat to world peace the iranians they are the ones who should be listened to and it is the united states and the europeans who should apologize to the iranian people for the suffering that they made them go through ok you want to reply to that i think we are in your own mind you want to know what reply becaus

some fashion syria and israel will have to be involved in a joint direct dialogue in some fashion that hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process if it is to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderately inclined participants on both sides makes sense i'm wondering if we could also now switch to iran since that's been a very big topic now for actually decades. iran has seen defiant despite sanctions and despite their threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies they've remained defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the u.s. should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable but we have to be conscious of that and it is a loyal would a possible war on iran if it is launched the threat and ame

it's the fear that if anyone in the west wants to respond to one of the terror proxies of iran like hezbollah, hamas, they know they will be going against a iran that is now nuclear armed. it's the fear of the non-nuclear warfare that iran will be able to engage in with impunity once they have the capability. >> here's our options as the west and united states. there are sanctions that are being deployed. some experts say it's working, others say it's not working. ahmadinejad says it's not woging. you can use a military strike. what about diplomacy? the president says he's going to use his appearance at the united nations this week as an open door, he's encouraging iran but only if they'll let inspectors go in and ensure -- here's the live pictures right now from the united nations -- that it is a peaceful program. reza, where do we stand on diplomacy? the president wanted direct talks. why hasn't it happened? >> part of it is, we're not sure who is calling the shots in iran. is it the president? the military, the mullahs? iran is more fractured, particularly the conservatives who control the

some fashion syria and israel will have to be involved in a joint direct dialogue in some fashion but hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process if it is to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderately inclined participants on both sides makes sense i'm wondering though if we could also now switch to iran since that's the. big topic now for actually decades. iran has seemed defiant despite sanctions and despite other threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies they've remained defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the u.s. should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable but we have to be conscious of the fact and it is avoidable a possible war on iran if it is launch of the threat and

some fashion syria and israel will have to be involved in a joint direct dialogue in some fashion that hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process if it has to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderate. trying participants on both sides makes sense i'm wondering if we could also now switch to iran since that's then a very big topic now for actually decades. iran has seemed defiant despite sanctions and despite other threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies they've remained defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the us should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable but we have to be conscious of the fact and it is a load of wood a possible war on iran if it is launched the threat and

some fashion syria and israel will have to be involved in a joint direct dialogue in some fashion that hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process that has to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderately inclined participants on both sides makes sense i'm wondering though if we could also now switch to iran since that's the new. big topic now for actually decades. iran has seemed defiant despite sanctions and despite other threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies they've remained defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the u.s. should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable but we have to be conscious of the fact that it is a boy that would a possible war on iran if it is launched the

some fashion syria and israel will have to be involved in a joint direct dialogue in some fashion that hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process if it is to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderately inclined part to. supposing both sides make sense i'm wondering if you could also now switch to iran since that's then a very big topic now for actually decades. iran has seemed defiant despite sanctions and despite other threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies they've remained defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the us should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable but we have to be conscious of that and it is a boy who would a possible war on iran if it is launch of the threat a

some fashion syria and israel will have to be involved in a joint direct dialogue in some fashion that hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process if it is to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderate. client participants on both sides make sense i'm wondering if we could also now switch to iran since that's been a very big topic now for actually decades. iran has seen defiant despite sanctions and despite other threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies they've remained defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the u.s. should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable but we have to be conscious of the fact and it is a boy would a possible war in iran if it is launch of the threat and amer

worked through the whole lot iraq syria iran dealing with all this sort of gets in the course of it hezbollah hamas except for in other words he thought the world had to be made a new and that after the september eleventh it had to be done by force and with urgency so we've gone through all that long he didn't say that in those meetings but you know dick was always absolutely hardline on these things but i think he would openly evolve this his worldview was that the world had to be remade up to september eleventh but you can't dismiss that cheney view and say well that's just that's stupid ok tony blair saying we can't dismiss cheney's view as stupid dick cheney megalomaniac warmonger are guilty of war crimes. insider trader created the insider panel with the bush administration father of the enron scandal father of the how the burton scandals father of the scandals over there. blackwater now xe he is evil incarnate when ronald reagan talked about the axis of evil it was dick cheney his mirror image and the mirror image of his mirror image he is the father son and holy ghost of evil dick chen

some fashion syria and israel will have to be involved in a joint direct dialogue in some fashion but hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process if it is to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderately inclined part to. supposing both sides make sense i'm wondering if you could also now switch to iran since that's been a very big topic now for actually decades. iran has seemed defiant despite sanctions and despite other threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies they've remained defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the us should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable but we have to be conscious of the fact that it is avoidable would a possible war on iran if it is launch of the thr

some fashion syria and israel will have to be involved in a joint direct dialogue in some fashion that hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process if it is to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderately inclined participants on both sides makes sense i'm wondering if we could also now switch to iran since that's then a very big topic now for actually decades. iran has seemed defiant despite sanctions and despite their threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies they've remained defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the u.s. should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable but we have to be conscious of the fact that it is avoidable would a possible war on iran if it is launched the threa

some fashion syria and israel will have to be involved in a joint direct dialogue in some fashion but hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process if it is to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderately inclined participants on both sides makes sense i'm wondering though if we could also now switch to iran since that's been a very big topic now for actually decades. iran has seen defiant despite sanctions and despite their threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies they've remained defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the us should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable but we have to be conscious of that and it is a lot of what a possible war on iran if it is launched the threat an

that hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process that has to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderately inclined participants on both sides makes sense i'm wondering if you could also now switch to iran since that's been a very big topic now for actually decades. iran has seen defiant despite sanctions and despite other threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies remain defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the u.s. should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable but we have to be conscious of the fact that it is avoidable would a possible war on iran if it is launched the threat and america's. standing in eurasia i think a war in the region it will spread and of all the am

there is the double standards of bound mean we have a democratically elected government in gaza we have hezbollah that participates in lebanese politics and irrespective of what your attitude is towards the any republican republic of iran they do have a form of democracy if you don't if you respect if you like it or not isn't that really just a double standard i mean when you know muslims arabs muslims practice democracy then it's the nine by the west because that's not democracy they accept because it's not in the geopolitical interest of the united states and its allies that's pure hypocrisy would you agree with that. absolutely and it is. strange in the sense that although islamic walkmans have proven to. want to be part of a democratic process and have been the victims of the lack of the market there is asian we continue to hear people accuse islamic movements or these movements of its lack of political islam of being the democratic i think the major obstacle to democratization in the muslim world today as we stand in this very moment is the united states of america. and their allies in the w

there's the double standards of bound mean we have a democratically elected government in gaza we have hezbollah that participates in lebanese politics and irrespective of what your attitude is towards the iranian republic the islamic republic of iran they do have a form of democracy if you don't if you respect if you like it or not isn't that really just a double standard i mean when when you know muslims arabs muslims practice democracy then it's to nine by the west because that's not democracy they accept because it's not. the geopolitical interests of the united states and it's ours that's pure hypocrisy would you agree with that. absolutely and it is strange in the sense that although islamic movements have proven to one to be part of a democratic process and have been the victims of the lack of the market there is asia we continue to hear people accuse islamic movements or his movements of its lack of political islam of being on the democratic i think the major obstacle to democratization in the muslim world today as we stand in this very moment is the united states of america. and their a

there is the double standards of bound mean we have a democratically elected government in gaza we have hezbollah that participates in lebanese politics and irrespective of what your attitude is towards the i mean the republican republic of iran they do have a form of democracy if you don't if you respect if you like it or not isn't that really just a double standard i mean when when you know muslims arabs muslims practice democracy then it's to nine by the west because that's not democracy they except because it's a. in the geopolitical interests of the united states and it's ours that's pure hypocrisy would you agree with that. absolutely and it is strange in the sense that although islamic woman's have proven to one to be part of a democratic process and have been the victims of the lack of the market there is asia we continue to hear people accuse islamic movements or these movements of its lack of political islam of being the democratic i think the major obstacle to democratization in the muslim world today as we stand in this very moment is the united states of america. and their allies in

there's the double standards of bound mean we have a democratically elected government in gaza we have hezbollah that participates in lebanese politics and irrespective of what your attitude is towards the i mean the republican republic of iran they do have a form of democracy if you don't if you respect if you like it or not isn't that really just a double standard i mean when when you know muslims arabs muslims practice democracy then it's to nine by the west because that's not democracy they accept because it's a. in the geopolitical interests of the united states and it's ours that's pure hypocrisy would you agree with that. absolutely and it is strange in the sense that although islamic woman's have proven to one to be part of a democratic process and have been the victims of the lack of the market there is asian we continue to hear people accuse islamic movements or his movements of its lack of political islam of being under the democratic i think the major obstacle to democratization in the muslim world today as we stand in this very moment is then i states of america. and their allies in

some fashion syria and israel will have to be involved in a joint direct dialogue in some fashion that hezbollah will have to be fitted into the process so we're dealing here with more or less known pieces that will have to be at different stages drawn into a process if it is to be a lasting one but in present circumstances for the negotiations to begin by the most moderately inclined participants on both sides makes sense i'm wondering if we could also now switch to iran since that's then a very big topic now for actually decades. iran has seen defiant despite sanctions and despite their threats coming from outside forces including some of their allies they've remained defiant do you think that it will eventually lead to airstrikes on their nuclear facilities well i certainly hope not. because i don't think a wider war in the region is to be desired and the u.s. should not support israel if they choose to do that independently i think a wider war in the region is not desirable and we have to be conscious of that and it is a load of wood a possible war on iran if it is launched with the threat a

there is the double standards of bound mean we have a democratically elected government in gaza we have hezbollah that participates in lebanese politics and irrespective of what your attitude is towards the i mean the republican republic of iran they do have a form of democracy if you don't if you respect if you like it or not isn't that really just a double standard i mean when you know muslims arabs muslims practice democracy then it's a nine by the west because that's not democracy they accept because it's a. in the geopolitical interests of the united states and it's ours that's pure hypocrisy would you agree with that. absolutely and it is. strange in the sense that although islamic woman's have proven to one to be part of a democratic process and have been the victims of the lack of the market there is asia we continue to hear people accuse islamic movements or this movement so it's political it's of being on the democratic i think the major obstacle to democratization in the muslim world today as we stand in this very moment is the united states of america. and their allies in the west bec