. >> commissioner moore? >> just for the record, in my recollection, that is in support of mr. washington and when we ask for two opposing parties, to work things out, it is mostly after we have looked at the project. the agreement was well created here, and it was not with any guidance from any planning commission, i know was seated in 2010. i do not recall this project because the project is a number of others, and it is things and the approval of the planning commission and how you paint your trim and all things and the tonalty of the garage and whatever, those are personal agreements which go way, way beyond what normally this planning commission comments on as really have any influence on. so in your recollection, too, how do we encourage the dr applicant and the opposing parts to work things out after we have given guidance and sometimes we do it once and twice and three times sending them back to work it out but specific input of what we are looking for in terms of being the critical issues. and not seeing the property line and the projects which have common lines, and t

. >> contrary to what commissioner moore has said. >> there was a process in place where in the city is actively encouraging this kind of process to take place and then to actually believe that perhaps there was something that is enforcable when it actually is not enforcable and if that is the direction where that is the process, i think that the city should have a huge disclaimer, written disclaimer that says, we are encouraging you to work this out, but it has no meaning. >> okay. >> but we approve out of that when there is an agreement, what we approve is a permit for a set of plans. >> and typically that is what moves forward and that is what can be built. i mean, and but we can't say to somebody, who is a new owner whether it is two years or five years or 20 years later, that they can't come in for a permit and we refuse to process it, we literally can't do that. >> they can come in whenever they want to. >> when you are telling us, from this staff viewpoint that whatever got worked out, has no meaning. >> because, the staff is going to look at it. >> and it has a new project. >

you've got the deck there >> commissioner moore. >> i'd like to take a slightly different take at the building. i believe if you have a smaller lot that does necessarily entitle you to have a larger lot so in order to avoid conflicts there's an appropriate seizing to understand what's next to you. having said that i'd like to look at a special circumstance in which this property occurs and then reflect on how we use guidelines. we have an unusual situation. i'll talk about that. we have significant topographic to the back of the house. they don't need as much of a demissing lines. we're not talking about the usual open space the only thing you want to protect is privacy. taking that further to the front of the building we have a split street with how you come to the building on one level you have how you travel in one level to the other level. it's different when we have is a level street. i would agree as a see bar with commissioner i'm concerned about the balconies facing the street. they should be smaller. but i really want to talk about is how we potentially shrink the building bu

. >> commissioner moore? >> it is not very often that as quickly as the developer for the far-reaching policy that the majority of the commissioners basically agree of what we are trying to do and it is not going to be one size fits all but i think that we have let certain parts of san francisco vie tal commercial corridors be too over powered and you can live quickly anywhere usa and picking up on what someone else said and i think that for the supervisors as well as the commission to be cognoscente that something needs to happen and that does not mean that snow but the fine tuning as i said that i think supervisor weiner supports and the policy that we discussed has testified with the testament and the director that we want to find this and the larger degree of the determination for each neighborhood and since this particular neighborhood based on the plan and the incredible work for the adjoining neighbors and etc. have put into this, i think that we are at a time of critical transformation as well present

. - commissioner moore >> some of us wanted to attend but unfortunately were tied up with other matters. >> your weekly report. there were mobile food facilities the commissioners proposal was before them and also considered two pieces of legislation. one would amended the public works code and the other the transportation code. in particular it would address the location of food trucks in relation to schools and food trucks that are with retail food uses. you considered this over a year ago. at that point you recommended approval of some modifications. the ordinance would have allowed mobile food facilities within rh and that other destroys. if those particles contained medical institution or a post secondary institution. there were also hours for operation that were limited. you recommended approval modifications they were to identify the process by the planning code should be required for food trucks located within 50 feet of a particle that has a residential use. the supervisor respond to your request and broontd it slightly not only within 50 feet of a dwelling unit but 50 feet of

is beyond where it was, in the agreement, and i would agree to go 5-6 from ma point >> commissioner moore? >> i would take dr along the same type of conclusions commissioner hillis is drawing, i think that the deck is too far even in front of me as the length it is, i would pull it back because that is indeed what we like and then historic enclosed setting here with the older homes that have to have side relationships. i am comfortable with supporting what you are saying and here we go. >> commissioner antonini? >> my only question is i think that they are bringing it back a little too far, the present deck is 14 x 13. and the proposing to go to 14 by 24. and now, we are already back two feet and so, i guess that if you are saying, commissioner is that your net is going to be five feet back and it is going to be probably 21. but, it only gives them some what of an expansion but not all the way out there. because there are... it is acknowledged that the because of the planters being there, they are two feet from the parapit as it is and so you want a five foot separation, and i wanted a th

commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. >> i want to do a quick follow-up. along that line, do you have to buy gas in order to get a car wash? >> you do not, but most people [speaker not understood] the pricing. >> commissioner moore. >> since we are adjacent to a residential neighborhood which is actually close by, i would say the car wash hours should be restricted to 9:00 p.m. the machine goes on and off, the machine does not run constantly. the machine goes on when the car pulls over that threshold where you turnoff your motor and you put your car. the acceleration of noise from zero to something is actually quite noticeable. and i could have pair that to a similar situation actually in sausalito. [speaker not understood]. there is a driveway separating the residential from the car wash itself. and i also find the kicking in of the whole motor annoying. and i can see that, which is really a quiet residential area given it's nice traffic calms down on lincoln road. there is more ambient quietness right at the edge of this residential. the reason i'm sayin

commissioner moore? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commissioner wu? >> aye. >> and commissioner fong? he's absent. okay, that motion passes +6 to -0 with one absent. okay, commissioners, we'll move on now to item number 17. this is item number 2006.0647dd, 2166 12th avenue. and in this case the two ds indicate i believe two discretionary review applications. we'll find out in a moment. this is a request for discretionary review and we'll begin with staff presentation. did staff explain at the beginning of the hearing there was a request to continue this item? >> one d-r requestor. >> and one d-r requestor is present, and the other d-r requestor is requesting a continuance, is that correct? >> has the continuance matter been resolved yet? >> no, i think i'd like to hear from the commission on that. >> okay. so, we'll begin with just the discussion of the continuance only for this case. commissioner moore? >> could somebody explain the reason for the other d-r requestor, why he is asking for co

. >> commissioner moore? >> we set the discussion for chipotle was the neighborhood opposition. and the merchants who very critically spoke about the over all change in the nature of market street which then led to a policy regarding form law retail. this is in a sense not formula retail that is judged but over concentration we did not have any neighbors to speak either for or against it, did we look at the element of participation and self-determination that does not seem to be a discussion here. the corridor is kind of dominated by a small and it puts the emphasis on the various small restaurants of different kinds and size, and this is a 1600 square foot with an over 400,000 if we add to this chipotle and i think that it is hard to use this and i am concerned to go forward to very carefully look at how the corridor is starting to strip out the other necessary neighborhood retail. and because that was over the various self-reliant neighborhood from shoe store and now we are seeing more and more restaurants and i do think that we need to be more carefully looking at the transfo

. >> commissioner moore? >> here. >> and commissioner sugaya? >> here. >> commissioner fong is expected to join us late. first up, commissioners, are items proposed for continuance. items 1a and b for case nos. 2011.0430e and x - 480 potrero avenue, appeal of a preliminary mitigated negative declaration and request for large project authorization are proposed for continuance to july 18, 2013. i have no other items proposed for continuance and i have no speaker cards. >> is there any public comment on items proposed for continuance? seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner antonini. >> move to continue items 1a and 1b to july 18th. >> second. >> commissioner borden. >> i'm confused. i thought this was the one that we continued last week to the 11th. >> right. >> oh, i see. thanks for clarifying. thank you. on that motion to continue items 1a and b, commissioner antonini? >> aye. >> commissioner borden? >> aye. >> commissioner hillis? >> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commissioner wu? >> aye. >> s

>> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> no. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commissioner wu? is absent. is commissioner fong? >> aye. >> okay, that motion passes with 6 yes and 1 no -- sorry, 5 yes, 1 no, and one absent. and that, commissioners, is the last item on your regular calendar. we'll now move into general public comment which happens at the end of every planning commission hearing. at this time members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except for agenda items. >> is there any general public comment this evening? >> i have noed cards. >> okay. seeing none, the meeting is jour. adjourned. [adjourned] >> a . >> we are running a womens' volleyball program here at richmond rec center. it's really nice. the ladies here really enjoy the exercise and the play and it's a lot of fun want this program is not for the faint at heart. it's really intense . the ladies come out and really going after it. they love to compete. anyone can sign on. we're looking for more players

i want to echo commissioner moore's comments. i think that obviously consolidation can become very political, but maybe the way to take it out of politics somewhat is to really closely consider the land use. so, when considering where though eventual stops go, where is there residential, where are there schools, where are cultural institutions or small businesses? i think that as transit become very popular which is something we all want, it is also becoming somewhat of an amenity in this city, really fashionable. but there is a population of people that need transit they don't have enough money for a car. so, i think it's important to make sure all of the needs of the people in those neighborhoods are already being metmet or will still be met. >> commissioner sugaya. yes, on transit times and speeds and comparisons between cities, the numbers you gave out i assume are aggregate all of the different forms of transit that exist in the cities; is that right? we're counting subways and buses and whatever else. is this a break out be

. >> commissioner moore? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commissioner wu? >> aye. >> so moved, commissioners. that motion passes unanimously 6 po 0 and places you under your consent calendar. all matters listed here under constitute a consent calendar are considered to be routine by the planning commission and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests in which ebit the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or in future hearings. there are two items under your consent calendar, commissioners, items 2 and 3, case nos. case no. 2012.0391d for 524 vienna street, request for conditional use authorization. and 2012.0603c - 1881 post street, request for conditional use authorization. i have no speaker cards. >> is there any public comment for items on the consent calendar? seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner borden. >> i move to approve items 2 and 3 on t

so, yeah and a supervisor moore >> i had a question about the international initiative. i know they have expanded from china cities. could you elaborate a little bit about why its cost efficient >> one of the things we developed the model for the asian initiatives. we put the focus on business attraction for china and establishing headquarters. we've seen 3 hundred jobs created at the end of this year. one of the important things that was developed is the public private partnerships. they're not having the total weight of the private sector dollars to private investment and we've seen a concentration of businesses in san francisco that are using san francisco for a gateway of chinese markets coming here. we see the latino market with more than 15 percent of the cities being of latin decent. we see mexico and argentina and japan and vietnam and india. we're going looking to build on those relationships >> i'm almost done here. to just

so, yeah and a supervisor moore >> i had a question about the international initiative. i know they have expanded from china cities. could you elaborate a little bit about why its cost efficient >> one of the things we developed the model for the asian initiatives. we put the focus on business attraction for china and establishing headquarters. we've seen 3 hundred jobs created at the end of this year. one of the important things that was developed is the public private partnerships. they're not having the total weight of the private sector dollars to private investment and we've seen a concentration of businesses in san francisco that are using san francisco for a gateway of chinese markets coming here. we see the latino market with more than 15 percent of the cities being of latin decent. we see mexico and argentina and japan and vietnam and india. we're going looking to build on those relationships >> i'm almost done here. to just to continue on investing in investing. we're going to sought 3 new neighborhoods with their feasibility and finally we're going continue wi

supervisor moore >> i want to say i'm in agreement to blow 2 hundred percent to qualify for this. if you can't limit this to people who don't currently own a home they've sold their home adds to the calculation of why they needed the assistance. and i'm in agreement with a community of organizations that defines the first responders. so what you can do to broaden the definition to include others besides firefighters and police and sheriff's it would be helpful >> thanks for those suggestions. as the lady suggested. we're going to be going into ongoing discussions. as you mentioned it's going to be a pilot program. we're able to make a program and tweak it. so thanks >> consideration of time i'll keep going here. the other thing we're doing with the trust fund hearing we're spending down as well as leveraging other state and local funds. this is important where the federal and state requirement limit the using uses like maybe owner occupied. we want to use the local dollars to expand the programs for homeowner thought accident city. and in terms of our affordable housing pipeline p

. >> and my name is jim moore and i have been project manager for pet food express for about 18 years. and i have been working with sally and michael on this project for quite a while. and they put together a serious package of information that deals with a lot of issues that you have heard about tonight already. we were just told that we are not actually a part of the agenda and we are just a little bit confused about how we fit in and why we are the focus of the meeting and apparently there was a subcommittee meeting as well. but, i think that it would be fair for you to continue this or to consider the information as we... if we were able to actually present it to you. it is complex, and there is a lot of nuance to it because pet food express is not a typical formula use retailer. we are by definition formula use, but we are not a big chain. it is a san francisco story, and i think that it is one that needs to be heard. >> so we do request that you continue this, or at least not take action on it until you have actually have a chance to hear some of the facts and give us an opportu

>> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commissioner wu? >> aye. >> and commission president fong in >> aye. >> commissioners, that motion passes 7 po 0 unanimously. >> on the variance close the public hearing as well as commissioner sugaya's concerns about the project, i would be inclined to grant your requested variance and there is no way to have any commercial lease orthctionv property without granting a variance. with no subsidy letter appealable of the board of appeals within 10 days of the issuance of the [speaker not understood]. contact mr. beale. thank you. >> commissioners, next on your calendar is item 14 for case no. 2012.1356c - 2100 market street, request for conditional use authorization. >> good afternoon, president fong, and members of the commission. [speaker not understood] planning department staff. before you is a request for conditional use authorization to establish a formula retail restaurant with an outdoor activity area doing business as chipotle 2100 market street, on the corner of market and church street and wi

being transparent that were it connects people in ways one thing we've seen in chicago with supervisor moore is while he just barely won election before he implemented pb he won with a 37 percent voteer difference. i'm going to skip a couple of these. this is along with new york and chicago and our pilot here the fourth pb process in the u.s. it's actually, the first to happen citywide. valy is difference because of the structure and the way the process was implemented the lis were the highest project and 15 prelims and monitoring is going to cabin july 1st. so one of the things i want to go back to say when you talk about the power of pb in reaching communities that are hifl disfranchised that's not just what the cable decisions have been made. we want to make sure those communities are part of the process of designing pb so our steering committee came together and gaeng youth and communities was tyler number one priority in this process. so they decided that the voting age was 14 but the council choose to move it to 16. there were special programs for seniors and spanish speakers and actua

. >> a new path of destruction cutting through norman, moore and oklahoma city and leaving behind a trail of tragedy. >> if that tornado does continue to go that way, we're going to have a catastrophic nightmare. >> it's a frightening night for millions of americans. a series of tornadoes slammed into oklahoma city and surrounding areas, including the city of moore where that massive, ef-5 twister levelled entire neighborhoods last week. >> twisters and storms hit the area during the evening rush hour. so far, five people have died because of those storms. her woman and her baby killed as they were traveling down interstate 40 just west of oklahoma city. that interstate ultimately shut down, but not before multiple crashes and injuries. and even after the twisters pass, heavy rain sparked flash floods. all flights have been halted at will roger's airport so it can be used as a shelter . it's now unclear how long those people will be stranded there. >> smaller twisters touched down in missouri and illinois. this is welden spring, missouri. the state's governor has already declared a state

so i'm in favor of this and see what the other commissioners have to say >> commissioner moore. >> i appreciate the intent of fully understanding the work that has been done for balboa park including the expansion of the university i actually appreciate the diversity of the community weighing in on this. there was a broad range of comments made and it's appropriate. the business owners talking about the relationship on

live in liver moore where jana met with the woman's family today. >> reporter: we did. it was emotional tshg we talkedn hour, they came here to plan the funeral but they're still waiting for the body of trish to come back from the corner. >> family and friends says it is hard with so many unanswered questions. a fun loving and loyal friend and sister. >> it is hard not knowing what happened to her. >> brooke says she took the photos and laid down flowers and candles at the site where her sister was found dead. a hiker found the body down the hillside. today the county sheriffs says the autopsy is completed and considered this a suspicious death. there were visible injuries on her body. >> she would randomly call once in a while and saying hi and told us she was okay >> they last saw her in april after a fight in hayward, she called in may to say she was all right. investigators say they questioned her boyfriend and he says he has not seen her for weeks. >> family and friends now hope someone will step forward with information >> i just hope she was not in pain. it is ju

liver moore and pleasanton looking cool. next weekend we will officially have moved into the first weekend of summer and it's starting to look that way. 80s and 90s next weekend. that by the way is what we call uncomfortable weather, 90s. much nicer to run in 50s and 60s. >>> move over las vegas. why st. louis, missouri has just been voted the most sinful city in america. my education da. st. louis, missouri the top of the list of most sinful. the seven deadly categories, lust, pride, wrath, envi, greed, glutny, and sloth. the criteria is only for the city, not for the metro areas. if you live in the suburbs you're not as sinful as that city. >>> a history making moment today. 24-year-old ryan chalmers completed a challenge no one has ever attempted before. the pair olympian traveled from los angeles to new york by wheelchair. crossing the finish line in central park he began the more than 3,000 mile trek 47 days ago. he wanted to encourage others to take on challenges. he's also raising money for stay focused, a new york ci

first of all when i came onto this commission about nine months ago, i had a conversation with director moore. she was concerned about the morale at the cruise terminal. we had a conversation. she was saying, what do you think was wrong? i stop to try to find out what the issues were. i myself have been down there twice, went down there is a commissioner and walked around. peter daley took me around. i wanted to see what was going on. and i think what it is is this -- metro, port of san francisco and ilw are all stakeholders. if there are tensions and problems we have to do it together because we have to grow this business. when i went down, mike -- from local 10 was there, that was the first time ever that the ilw has traveled with the port of san francisco. i went to china with peter daily so that we could show a united front, labor, the port, management so that we could grow. we have an opportunity to do a lot of things. i personally think that i have not been involved in the negotiations, neither will i be because i'm the secretary-treasurer of international. if there is a problem people

>> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> no. >> commissioner sugaya? >> aye. >> commissioner wu? is absent. is commissioner fong? >> aye. >> okay, that motion passes with 6 yes and 1 no -- sorry, 5 yes, 1 no, and one absent. and that, commissioners, is the last item on your regular calendar. we'll now move into general public comment which happens at the end of every planning commission hearing. at this time members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except for agenda items. >> is there any general public comment this evening? >> i have noed cards. >> okay. seeing none, the meeting is jour. adjourned. [adjourned] come and experience lafayette park and enjoy the people, picnic and sunshine. this is a lovely place to take an afternoon stroll with your loved one hand in hand. located at got and sacramento street in the middle of pacific heights on top of the city's steep rolling hills, lafayette park offers a great place, peaceful beauty. comfortably spaced tables and benches,

>> aye. >> commissioner moore? >> aye. >> commissioner sugaya. >> aye. >> commissioner wu. >> aye. >> commissioner fong? >> regrettably aye. >> and that motion passes. >> next item, please. >> commissioners, we'll be moving on to item number 16. this is case no. 2012.1131dd, 861 corbett avenue. this is a request for discretionary review. and as such, we will have a slightly different comment procedure during this hearing. there will be first a presentation from staff. following that there will be a five-minute presentation by the d-r requestor, and then public testimony for those who would support the d-r requestor. after that time there will be an opportunity for the project sponsor to have five minutes, and then public comment in support of the project sponsor for three minutes per person. we'll start with the staff presentation. >> good afternoon, president fong and commissioners. i'm rick crawford of department staff. this project would construct vertical and horizontal additions to add a second dwelling unit t

. >> commissioner moore. >> i shared the enthusiasm and also want to tag onto mr. williams' [speaker not understood] it is time to curtail these [speaker not understood]. it is a great way to communicate plannings to the public. >> commissioner wu. >> i agree. article 7 is much easier to use as someone that reads the chinatown [speaker not understood] all the time. this obviously is the most technical topic and i am somewhat interested in how the outreach works. it would be a targeted audience that would be interested. the more we can make it accessible to a larger public, i think that's an important goal. and the last thing i want to say is there is a huge body of comes that we're [speaker not understood]. not too long ago -- i can't remember right now, but we saw an item where there was an unintended consequence of the leg asian. i know that happens, but the more we can catch it on the front end, the better. >> commissioner antonini. >> mr. starr, i have a question for you. i really like the 1948 book and i kind of think it's what we should try to go back to. it