service which is a popular messenger services all around the world including here in germany he sold it to facebook in two thousand and fourteen and made billions and billions of dollars off it and now he is urging people to delete facebook as he's tweeted he is time and this is catching on online this is a question that everyone's asking themselves and each other should i delete my facebook for follow you going to do that and so this is something we also show media community. are they going to do that and a lot of people said well look it's a good idea but it's not quite as simple as that like this used. he commented to us we old delayed our accounts and then watch another social network fills the gap and we have the same or different problems the need for something like facebook will still be there and other commentators i'm not advocating for the delay ssion of your social media presence these hash tag is laughable to be honest given how dot a collection is part of every internet giant strategy we need to get better at giving our information away and you know some really good poin

service which is a popular messenger services all around the world including here in germany he sold it to facebook in two thousand and fourteen and made billions and billions of dollars off it and now he is urging people to delete facebook as he's tweeted here is time and this is catching on online this is a question that everyone's asking themselves and each other should i delete my facebook profile are you going to do that and so this is something we are social media community. where they going to do that and a lot of people said well look it's a good idea but it's not quite as simple as that like this used dirk singha he commented to us we all delayed our accounts and then watched another social network fills the gap and we have the same or different problems the need for something like facebook will still be saying another commentated i'm not advocating for the deletion of your social media presence these hash tag is laughable to be honest given how dot a collection is part of every internet giant strategy we need to get better at giving our information away and you know some re

service what's out which he sold to facebook in twenty fourteen for many billions of dollars so in a tweet brian acton is urging facebook users to cut the cord simply writing it's time to delete facebook serve real stinging blood to his by mark zuckerberg and he's one of the biggest voices leading this movement on tree to hash tag the late facebook but i guess the big question is can we cut the cord to facebook of course you can but there are a number of things you can do before that you can tighten your privacy settings which is something you know it's recommended to do you can also deactivate your account so that puts it on hold and should you choose to go back in the future you'll be getting it exactly as how you left it and you can also delete your accounts that means everything tied to your account is removed and it takes facebook about ninety days to get rid of all your right where you mention privacy so let's come to you know ian at the heart of this data scandal are the users themselves what are the lessons we've learned here about data privacy. dental privacy i suppose has b

service what's up which he sold to facebook in twenty fourteen for many billions of dollars now he's urging users on tweeted to cut the cord from facebook in this tweet he says it is time hash tag delete facebook five words but a stinging blurred to his by mock zuckerberg and question lots of people are asking now to themselves and to each other should read to facebook and it's a question we are. social media community and lots of people saying look it's not really as simple as just deleting your facebook this user brian singer. wrote to us we old delete our account and then watch another social network feels the gap and we have the same or different problems the need for something like facebook will still be there a better regulation of datta seems to be the issue and another comment. on trade i'm not advocating for the deletion of your social media presence the delayed hash facebook poll to be honest given how data collection is part of every internet giant strategy for ad servicing we need to get better at giving out information away so some pretty good points i think if you do wa

opt in to facebook and messenger services. if you don't want contacts and call history continuous will up loaded you can follow the steps to deactivate the share and still use the services. most aren't savvy enough to sort this out. >> users are fighting an unreasonable uphill battle. that doesn't meet informed consent. >> now on that fact check page, facebook makes it clear that it was not collecting the contents of the call and text. just the data. what is met data. what is it more valuable? that part of the story at 6:00. >> okay. you can't get back the data facebook already shared. there's a way to see what data facebook has about you. log into your act and go to settings there's a small script link that's a down load a copy of your data. follow the instructions and you'll get this page. you get an e-mail when your data is ready. you'll see this. a link to down load everything you have ever shared-over posted on facebook. that includes photographs and videos. status updates and everyone you have been friends with. past and

service. it's a patent infringement case including tagging other users in social media pictures and streamlining notifications so they don't inundate the user. facebook says it will fight this attempt by blackberry! >>> the job market continues to look strong in the u.s. adp says the private sector added 235,000 jobs last month, the unemployment at a 17-year low of 4.1%. looks like another rocky day ahead for the stock market. this after white house chief economic adviser gary cohn announced his resignation reportedly over his inability to convince president trump to not go ahead with the tariffs on steel and aluminum. and so the market is heading lower. let's check it. dow down 180. nasdaq down 129. nasdaq down 16. michelle and kenny, back to you. >> thank you, jason brooks from kcbs radio. >>> happening today, uber will roll out its new robot taxi service in san francisco. but it's only available for employees working on the company's self-driving project. about 300 workers of uber's advance

service whatsapp which he sold to facebook in twenty four teams many many billions of dollars in a tweet he uses to. it is time hash tag delete facebook five words but it's a stinging blow to his by a. lot of people are talking about this now should we delete facebook friends too and that's something we. social media community here at joint savella you going to delete facebook a lot of values as a saying it's not quite as simple as just doing bash like. one of values as he said we all delayed our accounts and then watch another social network fills the gap and we have the same or different problems the need for something like facebook will still be there we need better regulation of data that seems to be the issue and another comment. i'm not advocating for the deletion of your social media presence the delayed hash tag facebook is laughable we need to get better at giving out information away so i think pretty good points what do you make of that i mean at the heart of the scandal is of course the usurers themselves wake of the lessons learned here are in terms of. privacy well i think

service what's up which he sold to facebook in two thousand and fourteen for many billions of dollars so in a tweet brian acton is urging facebook users to cut the cord simply writing it's time delete facebook serve real stinging blur to his by mark zuckerberg and he's one of the biggest voices leading this movement on tree to hash tag delete facebook but i guess the big question is can we cut the cord to facebook of course you can but there are a number of things you can do before that you can tighten your privacy settings which is something you know it's recommended to do you can also deactivate your account so that puts it on hold and should you choose to go back in the future you'll be getting it exactly as how you left it and you can also delete your accounts that means everything tied to your account is removed it takes facebook about ninety days to get rid of all your right where you mention privacy so let's come to you know ian at the heart of this data scandal are the users themselves what are the lessons we've learned here about data privacy. privacy i suppose has become ver

they use messenger, facebook, to do that. google assista nt facebook, to do that. google assistant on the phone makes it interesting for brands to directly contact consumers. we partner with google and facebook and other brands to help them to establish a presence in the space and are rarely talk to consumers. it removes the need for advertising when people are in the experience. 0nce advertising when people are in the experience. once your there, advertising when people are in the experience. 0nce yourthere, it advertising when people are in the experience. once your there, it is about creating something relevant and keeping them talking. womack and getting a spending! -- and getting us getting a spending! -- and getting us spending. rob bennett, thank you for coming in. rob bennett, the ceo of rehab. let's go to brazil now — final growth figures are out later and they will confirm its first year of economic expansion since the worst recession in the country's history. brazil's economy shrank almost 10% in two years — with the car industry the worst hit of all

messenger: it varies, your honor. in the federal law, this court implied the duty of -- justice alito: well, no, we're talking about state law. mr. messenger: yes. in state law, for example, in illinois state law, there is a provision in the illinois labor relations act that expressly provides a duty of fair representation. justice alito: yeah, i understand that. are they -- is that constitutionally required? mr. messenger: no, your honor. justice kennedy: with reference to some of the other cases they've discussed, have the unions at any point in this litigation or any point in their history ever said that they're committed to the -- to the idea of viewpoint neutrality? mr. messenger: no, your honor. justice breyer: i wonder, since your time is limited, let me say three -- three quick questions. what you're doing basically is trying to apply a more modern framework to some older cases. this has been the law for 50 years just about. ok? holmes and brandeis didn't know about these modern framework. how many cases shoul

messenger: it varies, your honor. in the federal law, this court implied the duty of -- justice alito: well, no, we're talking about state law. mr. messenger: yes. in state law, for example, in illinois state law, there is a provision in the illinois labor relations act that expressly provides a duty of fair representation. justice alito: yeah, i understand that. are they -- is that constitutionally required? mr. messenger: no, your honor. justice kennedy: with reference to some of the other cases they've discussed, have the unions at any point in this litigation or any point in their history ever said that they're committed to the -- to the idea of viewpoint neutrality? mr. messenger: no, your honor. justice breyer: i wonder, since your time is limited, let me say three -- three quick questions. what you're doing basically is trying to apply a more modern framework to some older cases. this has been the law for 50 years just about. framework to some older cases. ok? holmes and brandeis didn't know about these modern

i pay for my imo service provider, i pay for my messenger, i'm in the commonest -- i am an economist, i do not know if they will keep my data safe, but as an economist, i know there is no freedom -- no free things. what i would be interested in do org is what can we when will the rest of us wake up and realize there is something going on wrong and maybe change their behavior? what can we do to incentivize them? makee do anything else to them understand that there is no free lunch and that not only the government, but the specialized our problems, but also microsoft, google, and facebook. [indiscernible] [laughter] >> when i talked earlier about seeing the progression of privacy through the years, one thing that has challenged companies through the years is how to make it transparent to users about what they are doing with their data, how it is being used. i have seen this at my company and likely others, we have gone you start to read through the policies and you get to the 45th page and the engineers who wrote it, have to explain what they are doing and legalins becoming this gobbled

i pay for my imo service provider, i pay for my messenger i am an economist, i , do not know if they will keep my data safe, but as an economist, i also know that there is no free lunch. what i would be interested in knowing is what can we do or when will the rest of the population wake up and basically there is something going wrong, and maybe they have to change their behavior? what can we do to incentivize them? is education enough, or can we do anything else to make them understand that there is no free lunch and that not only the government, but the specialized arecies like clear choice our problem, but also microsoft, google, and facebook. [indiscernible] [laughter] >> when i talked earlier about seeing the progression of privacy through the years, one thing that has challenged companies through the years is how to make it very transparent to users about what they are doing with their data, how it is being used. i have seen this at my company and likely others, where, when i first arrived and you start to read through the policies and you get to the 45th page and the n you look

the question is, if you do not opt in, will those services to work for you? >> i'm sorry, heavy sigh here. for many of the applications, no . you either opt in or you don't use them. for some, they will restrict the types of uses that you will do. so it really depends on the application, but for the most part, opt in means to use and opt out means that probably you are not going to use it at all. >> but for most people, when they click that little box that says i agree to the terms and conditions, do they really understand that what you are doing is allowing access to what you are basically doing, the phone calls are making, the text messages you are sending? >> no. if you have ever looked at these agreements, they go on and on and they are written in legalese. that is one of the issues that is going to come up in legislation, is to make these a use and access -- to make these excess agreements and plainer language, simpler to understand, with lots of nice will it points. right now, no, people look at it and go whatever, and they simply click i agree move on.

these companies provide and i mean i see no reason why you know all email providers or an old messenger providers should be private companies the government like the postal system perhaps perhaps perhaps it's a noncommercial tentative that is under public control but not controlled by the state is that interesting from this and we'll see if you know if it comes to fruition alexander fanta with nets policy thought we're going to think very much for being on the day thanks jeff. a tonight's in russia anger is mounting over the shopping center fire in siberia that killed sixty four people forty one of them were children president vladimir putin visited the scene today and blamed the high death toll on what he called criminal negligence but many are accusing the authorities of a cover up. this fire has done more than scorch what was once the chemical shopping center. it stirred intense anger here over alleged negligence corruption and lax fire safety standards many people here also don't believe the death count officials are giving they think there could be more victims. might these two are

the company says the app provide a service for something children will do on liens. the study shows 47% of parents are worried about the child's use of technology. >> they want more control. so in that way we really are trying to build for families. building for families is a great business model over the long run. >> facebook says they need to do more reserve about tech addiction and admits they could be part of the problem. meantime, the european union has told social media companies to remove terrorist related, illegal or inflammatory content from the platforms or risk being flagged by authorities. >>> tesla elon musk says he can ease traffic congestion by saving billions in dollars there are estimates that it will cost up to 15 bill yo doll -- billion dollars to build the second bart tunnel but musk went on social media and announced one of his companies can build the tube at a 10th of the cost and a 5th of the time. musk proposed building a tunneler calls -- he calls a hyperloops with pods carrying passengers connecting washington, d.c. and new york. iewb -- >>>

they can use secure services like one's app. a lot of people look at -- >> the problem is facebook messenger is so intertwined. that was part of the android scandal that we saw yesterday with facebook messenger saying we can see what phone calls you make if you allow us access. a lot of people are using the apps because they're free and easy. >> and i'm thinking for your generation, that's what will keep you using it. you're offended, you tonight like the privacy invasion. you love it and you send god awful images back and forth. your kids will never grow up. i don't think it will change. you'll be outraged? >> things have changed a little bit. look at the stop dropping. they were trying to release one of those speakers -- they were going to release one of those home speakers in may. nobody will want that in their home. >> neil: i'm saying your generation will whine and complain about this but still have the technology. you won't change. you will lead -- still staring at that phone and stumble in. >> i will walk effectively in t

the company has faced criticism over kid messenger app that target kid consumers under 13 years old. facebook is providing a service for something that kids will do anyway online, it's a way for parents to get them off apps that aren't kid friendly and puts parents in control. but i asked her if this was a way for facebook to capitalize on a very young user base before their competitors. >> they want more control. so in that way we really are trying to build for families, and really if you think about it, building for families over the long run is a great business model. reporter: a new study shows 47% of parents are worried about tech use. they need to do a lot more research on tech addiction but admits facebook or instagram could be a part of the problem. that's something they're looking into. ginsburg credits the news feed to make sure facebook is having a positive impact on users in the long term even if it causes stock to take a dip in the short term. >> so in our mind, the business interest and the user interest completely 100% align and that over time as people find more meani

the company says the app provides a service for something that children will do anyway online. a new survey shows 40% of parents are worried about their kids' use of technology. >> they want more control. in that way, we really are trying to build for families. really, if you think about it, building for families over the long run is a great business model. >> facebook says the company does need to do more research about tech addiction and admits that facebook could be part of the problem. in the meantime the european union has told social media companies to remove all illegal or inflammatory content or at risk for being flagged by authorities. >>> uber is starting a new service that help people get to their doctor's appointments. it will set up rides for patients to make sure that they can get to their appointments. the businesses will be billed for the rides and the rides can be set up days or hours in advance. they want to help millions who miss doctor's appointments each year due to transportation problems. >>> elon musk says he can ease congestion while building another tu

it is convenient to get all of the services that we want, messaging, email, and this one for free in exchange for our data. i've it for my -- i do it for my i pay forice provider my messenger, i'm in the commonest -- i am an economist, i do not know if they will keep my data safe, but as an economist, i know there is no freedom -- no free things. they have no other choice and basically using, selling, and exploiting my data. what i would be interested in knowing is what can we do or when will the rest of us wake up and realize there is something going on wrong and maybe change their behavior? what can we do to incentivize them? can we do anything else to make them understand that there is no free lunch and that not only the government, but the specialized agencies like our problems, but also microsoft, google, and facebook. [indiscernible] [laughter] >> when i talked earlier about seeing the progression of privacy through the years, one thing that has challenged companies through the years is how to make it transparent to users about what they are doing with their data, how it is bei

this failure has me questioning heavily how lower ranking service members in situations like ours are treated and how their cases are handled. nearly five months, five months into the investigative process our case was assigned to three , powerhouse attorneys who did an unbelievable job in seeing to it that justice was somewhat served for our daughter. our case went to the general court-martial where wilson was found guilty of sexual assault of a child, con -- of a child, conduct unbecoming of an officer and gentleman and for all charges against him in aus trail yand an unauthorized absence. he was sentenced to 5 1/2 years in the military brig. during our trial, i was not given the opportunity to give a victim impact statement on behalf of my 6-year-old daughters. i was reminded of the pain i felt due to my voice being restricted at sentencing when i saw all of the gymnasts who were victims of larry nasser giving their victim impact statements. we were not given that opportunity to be heard. part of being able to heal from something as traumatic as this is to be able to speak to those

krishgs s to act swiftly to seize his personal devices, and this has me questioning how lower ranking service members in situations like ours are treated and how their cases are handled. nearly will five months, five months into the investigative process our case was assigned to three powerhouse attorneys who did an unbelievable job in seeing to it that justice was somewhat served for our daughter. our case went to the general court-martial where wilson was found guilty of sexual assault of a child, ap conduct unbecoming of an officer and gentleman and for all charges against him in aus trail yand an unauthorized absence. he was sentenced to 5 1/2 years in the military brig. during our trial, i was not given the opportunity to give a victim impact statement on behalf of my 6-year-old daughters. u i was minded of the pain i fe due to my voice being restrict ed at sentencing when i saw all of the gymnasts who were victims of larry nasser giving their impact statements. we were not given that opportunity to be heard. part of being able to heal from something as traumatic as this is to be able to

willing to resign their obligations under the constitution and their system of checks and balances the service of that deeply flawed president. >> who would believe nunes was working in a credible way to find out what took place as a matter of fact, he was simply a messenger boy for the president running up in the middle of the night trying to prove that obama, for example, had wiretapped the president. and so, they can conclude whatever they want to. they weren't doing anything to begin with. it was not a credible investigation. brian: now you mentioned before, while ainsley was doing her interview, she is going to get a tape -- you mentioned before this does not surprise that you democrats are upset by the final. but, in the senate, you were encouraged that you would be talking to senators and you didn't even know where their staff -- what party they were in. should we look forward to that being less partisan? >> at senate intel i was impressed. you walk out of a room after almost 10 hours of interviewing you didn't know who was on whose side. those guys actually seemed like they were trying