including google. and so, you know, to me, it's really a, a pretty simple, you know, decision here that -- that, you know, congress didn't make distinctions between these two different types of code. this is merely hindsight, good lawyering or at least the best lawyering that we can do to basically paper over the business decision that was obviously made here to violate software license agreements. >> yeah, right. wait for the mic. great, thank you. >> so not a technologist, but what are the practical business implications for google if they were to lose this case in terms of the current usability of their products? what happens if the status quo changes? >> sure. the ultimate outcome of the case would be, i suppose, damages. i don't know whether -- i imagine there's a possibility, right, of an injunction in the case of intellectual property. now, of course, that would be, you know, kind of yet another element of decision that would have to be done by the courts and the courts of appeals and things lik

you tube should not be under the corporate control of google because google just can't keep its hands out of the you know honeypot we've seen them try to hack culture hack politics and for them to be able to use their influence to you know hide searches and decide what the public is to see on its various services needs to be looked at scrutinized and and broken off from the main company so that for he is thank you for joining us and for your conscience and for speaking out. coming up valentine's day is the super bowl for florists and chocolate tears and greeting cards but is commercialism creeping out the uncoupled and is technology competing with cupid this is the big picture on r.t. america. i walk through the streets of moscow now blood 100 people i was found 8 of them would have the changes of loops in the blood that they don't have to keep because in order for them that leukemia they need the d.n.a. changes they also need an environment that's receptive and one of the biggest areas of growth in medicine in the future is be targeting. changing news so the cancer doesn't want to. d

supported google's position. they don't make their money on tech either. you see how they are making their money charging for computer cycles in the big cloud services facilities. speaking of microsoft they make their money not distributing their software anymore. it is all in the cloud and they are causing -- all paying microsoft $99 a year for access to their sweet of software. that is very different model, charging for the access of the software and they are compensated based on cycles so software has become the content for these cloud service providers and if they find content for free, for reduced price, wouldn't netflix like to have disney for free. >> thank you so much. in regards, this is on the side of oracle. how will the tech fields change? if it goes inside of google for example, all these large corporations use it for free but the inverse side, stringent copyright preventing these corporations from copyrighting all their lines and limiting things altogether. since we are going into the metaphysical a

google because oracle sued google for copyright infringement. just quickly, what happened through the past 11 years that this ended up as a google v oracle. >> sure. 2010 based google in on patent and copyright infringement. the patents were out of the case pretty quickly and it went to a jury trial and the jury decided that google infringed the copyrights. they split on the issue of fair decision washat first appealed to the federal circuit court of appeals here in washington. because of the fact that they were patents. where the decision went. the declaring code and the structure seeks an organization of the packages entitled to copyright protection and therefore, they reversed this court and sent it back for a new trial on fair use. back to they went district court and decided fair use. that of course went to the jury and the jury this time found that it was excused by fair use. now, we get a second appeal to the court of appeals for the federal circuit. arguinge, oracle was that the fair use was not inappropriate decision and they again reve

and google didn't want to do that. and so they didn't want to kind of give away their -- their version of what they create using java. and so talks broke down. and you know, everybody knew what that meant, right? they weren't going to use java except that's not what actually google did. they made the decision that it would be more expeditious to copy some of what was in java. and to instead of designing their own they just decided that they were beginning to take it. so, that's kind of the -- you know, the background of the dispute. are they were actually in talks. was the made available two developers? >> i think there were three different types of licenses that you could take. >> one of them was the open model. another was a fully proprietary model, and you had to pay for that. so i think there were business decisions that were being made on both sides obviously. but you know, it was google that kind of knead business decision that they weren't going to license java under the model that was offered. adam: and were th

and google didn't want to do that. and so they didn't want to kind of give away their -- their version of what they create using java. and so talks broke down. and you know, everybody tpwhue that meant, right? they weren't going to use java except that's not what actually google did. they made the decision that it would be more expeditious to copy some of what was in java. and to instead of designing their own they just decided that they were beginning to take it. so, that's kind of the -- you know, the background of the dispute. are they were actually in talks. was the made available two developers? >> i think there were three different types of license that you could take. >> one of them was the open model. another was a fully proprietary model, and you had to pay for that. so i think there were business decisions that were being made on both sides obviously. you know, it was google that kind of knead business decision that they weren't going to license java under the model that was offered. > and were there alternat

to be fair for its own competitive advantage than a google or facebook. it is not a data harvester in the same way that a google or facebook and those companies make 85, 90% of their revenue on digital advertising that apple makes selling hardware devices. it wants to create that network and create that ecosystem in the loop you into buying as many apple products and services as possible so in that way it uses the network effect but i would point out a couple of things. for starters, apples commitment to privacy has varied very much depending on what country you are talking about. apple will capitulate on privacy in china in ways that it would not dream of doing in the u.s. so it is certainly subject to political pressure, differences in the way different countries regulate data and it is not going to stand up and fight beijing on these things. i would also say there are a couple of other problems with apple that overlap with some of the problems i see with google and facebook. one is in terms of who gets what part of the innovation pie. one of the big ar

google has abused its market dominance as a search engine by giving illegal advantages to another google. its shopping comparison service. now the company is taking legal action of the e.u. 2nd highest court in luxembourg. google is appealing to further huge fines totaling 8200000000 euros those also came from the e.u. commission over the past 3 years. google's c.e.o. saying the fines are excessive. sensible regulation must also take a proportionate approach that. social opportunities this is especially true in areas that are high risk and higher than the hearing in luxembourg is said to last 3 days but the verdicts could take several more months for more let's cross right over to detail these financial correspondent jan squat on wall street yes i am say you are how are investors the google chances in this case. well if you take a wall street as an indication then the tech companies do not have to be concerned too much at this point all of the big u.s. tech names are trading basically record highs this clearly is an important case because it could set the tone and pace for other cases ag

google has abused its market dominance as a search engine by giving illegal advantages to another google products its shopping comparison service because now the company is taking legal action at the e.u. 2nd highest court in luxembourg. google is appealing to further huge fines totaling 8200000000 euros those also came from the e.u. commission of the past 3 years google's c.e.o. say's the fines are excessive. sensible regulation must also take a proportionate approach balancing potential arms where social opportunities this is especially true in areas that are high risk and high value the hearing in luxembourg is said to last 3 days but the verdict could take several more months for more let's cross right over to me is financial correspondent dan squat on wall street yes hi yes there you are how are investors the ewing google chances in this case. well if you take wall street as an indication then the tech companies do not have to be concerned too much at this point all of the big u.s. tech names are trading basically at record highs this clearly is an important case because it could se

so my how hard is that for google to be able to fight this thing because right now. we know that this has happened to them before so is this something that they are familiar with or what is their defense. absolutely kristie google is saying hey this lawsuit is factually wrong we would never spawn kids we took a pledge several years ago that we wouldn't gather this information to use to do bad targeting and lo and behold the a.g. of new mexico says wait one second we're not buying this we think that that's exactly what you're doing so essentially a good portion of schools in new mexico about 2 thirds of them use these inexpensive often free educational tools that google provides and what this lawsuit states what they found is that even though under the educational products when these things like you know google docs or chrome books are being used in a course that's owned by google koren books work with their operational software so they're using these educational sources to further their education and supposedly it's not being used to gather information and it's not c

app available on smartphones through google play and the apple app store by searching portable t.v. or extremis to your. by dialing a pilot t.v. app on apple t.v. and online at parwan dot tv me only available on my devices very thin or as always you can check us out on youtube dot com slash boom bust art see no secret password required see is there will see you next time. join me every thursday on the alex simon show and i'll be speaking to guest of the world of politics sports business i'm showbusiness i'll see you then. in the troubled 19 seventies a group of killers rampage through parts of northern ireland that was coordinated loyalists attacks particularly catholic population in belfast tens of thousands are forced to flee their homes come up with strike and put these attacks was a p.r. you see the police actually took part in the attacks so instead of preventing it they were active participants in the burning of full streets in belfast at the take more than a 100 innocent civilians were unloaded as the review can seniors and we found out more i was surprised about the extent a

ad a valve on smartphones their google play and the app on strike by searching for one t.v. or stream us to your t.v. by downloading a part of a t.v. app on apple t.v. and online at our own t.v. parvati view of the i have on my devices and as always you can hit us up at youtube dot com slash boom bust r d c about your next time. thinking of getting a new book on the ones we got in here she found out why he didn't know until he was trapped in this tiny little wired conch being near the crate with him he will stir reaching out and she will want to stray many were near and thousands of reading dogs are caged in inhumane conditions on puppy farm i mean 67 years you know they've been locked up in a cage outside you see no protection from the weather the heat you know the courtier the rain the snow the funder nothing they have no protection. to get you. to get through kids. across the u.s. crude puppy mills are supported by dog shows and pet stores most of the puppies are coming from this large scale factory farming kind of operations are being sought at stores even giant a good b

app available on smartphones or google play and the app bots try by searching hardball t.v. or stream us to your t.v. by downloading the portable t.v. app on apple t.v. and online at horrible dot tv hardball t.v. will be available on more devices and as always you can hit us up at youtube dot com slash boom bust r d c about your next time. one of our esteemed ways or both. benefits will move it to. the plaza this we've got to talk. to the mother decided that the walk and i don't mean start then i think. this is the only thing that we do is music because everybody is on its. way to. the floor and the fee is going to persuade you that you have the ability to put it on the. what i think is this is the. accompli. we're told it's a total meltdown confusion consumes iowa as official struggle to report voting results for the boche i will caucus is the ultimate political metaphor of our times . thinking of getting a new phone the ones we got in here shows no problem was as he didn't know until he was trapped in this tiny little wired we don't need a crate with him he will just start

app available on smartphones the google play and the apple app store by searching portable t.v. are extremists to your t.v. by dialing a viable t.v. app on apple t.v. and online at parwan dot tv by one t.v. only available on my devices very or as always you can check us out on you tube dot com slash boom bust r t no secret password required so yes there see you next time. in the troubled 19 seventies a group of killers rampage 3 cups of mills and that was coordinated loyalists attacks particularly on the population of tens of thousands are forced to flee their homes come up with strike and put these attacks was that the are you see the police actually took part in the attacks so instead of presenting they were active participants in the burning of schools streets and belfast take more than 100 innocent civilians with. as the review can seniors and we found out more i was surprised about the extent and the take rates which the solutions. i was involved in some of those cases the killers would lead to be named. and we're getting i think it went to the very top i think it is. the w

a worrying development for those of us who do use google andi those of us who do use google and i did put it out of the viewer is one day, are you able to not use google? when you think about google maps, gmail, searching, the various elements of bits and pieces that people have in their homes. the amount of data they have on us is off the scale. it is ubiquitous. most of us don't really have a heads around of it, it's just data, just information. if you can actually control what is that you are offered to buy, things you can have, actually he was going to

tech companies like amazon apple facebook google. correct yes i'm actually going say name me the european big global tech you know these unicorns are all american companies and that's because of our deregulation the obviously the inspiration that's here in terms of the entrepreneurial spirit as well as all the other incentives financially tax wise etc in the u.s. i think what you're seeing though is you're beginning to see this global consensus you mentioned the finance minister of france that's bruno him saying this 2 days ago he was at the g 20 summit. saudi arabia i think what you're seeing is that actually the tech executives are going to eventually want this because what they don't need is to have different kind of regulations in different countries and eventually my prediction is you will see a global taxation the question is what level and how that's the issue at stake what level and how now france isn't the only country looking to do this apparently italy spain austria and the u.k. they have all announced plans to have some s

google basically ran the obama administration. facebook gave the obama administration special deals gave the obama campaign special access. on the left goes up there and says we don't like big tech, really? because you benefited from big tech. you got rich off big tech. now we don't have a real marketplace because these big tech companies, were all liberals putting stuff on the scale against donald trump all these companies get special deals from government and that means there is a real competition. >> it's also beyond social media. so many people talk about that because they're interacting with it so much everyday but you see it with google and gmail do yourselves a favor, subscribe to the email lists of some of the crazy leftists right now subscribe to the trumpet and conservative side and check your junk mailbox. see which side is going where. the inbox thing with her literally saying it's coming from trump going to your junk mail. it's going into your everyday life and this is what they will keep doing. you see it getting wor

has reached out to google for comment on the case and will let you know if they reply google has already faced numerous such cases in australia just this month a lawyer was awarded half a $1000000.00 over online comments claiming that he gave false and misleading advice and in july last year the tech giant was faced with a contempt of court charge for failing to remove her views about a high profile sydney businessman we debated the issue with broadcaster karen turk and journalist and commentator chatted more. this guy had one negative review and this is how he wants to get the courts involved you want to put this in google you want to sue the guy i mean just take care of your own business right it's sort of ridiculous and this is also a massive slippery slope how long if we keep up this culture until you're no longer allowed to criticize google itself or if you do you're some other massive corporation also offer free speech but you know it's given people a mask to hide behind and they're not taking responsibility for what's being posted and they are hurting innocent people and this is b

commission of the past 3 years google's c.e.o. say's the fines are excessive. sensible regulation must also take a proportionate approach that it's important arms where social opportunities this is especially true in areas that are high risk and high value the hearing in luxembourg is said to last 3 days but the verdicts could take several more months for more let's cross right over to the detail because financial correspondent dan squat on wall street yes hi yes there you are how are investors the ewing google's chances in this case. well if you take a wall street as an indication then the tech companies do not have to be concerned too much at this point all of the big u.s. tech names are trading basically record highs this clearly is an important case because it could set the tone and pays for other cases against companies like facebook amazon or pulled but verdict probably won't happen before early next year and then google even could go into another pealed so this decade long case is not over any time soon as it seems and i guess the european union has a re

app a bail bonds mark both the google play and the apple app store by searching portable t.v. or extremis to your t.v. by dialing a viable t.v. app on apple t.v. and online at parwan dot tv the only available on more devices very more as always you can check us out on youtube dot com slash boom bust art see no secret password required see is there see an expert. in the troubled 19 seventies a group of killers rampage through parts of northern ireland that was coordinated loyalists attacks particularly on the population of belfast tens of photos and support forced to flee their homes and what was striking to point these attacks was that the are you see the police actually took part in the attacks so instead of preventing it they were active participants in the burning of full streets in belfast i think more than 100 innocent civilians were unloaded as the review can seniors and we found out more i was surprised about the extent and of the currency which the collusion was involved in some of those cases that killers would later be named into then a gag i think it went to do very

a worrying development for those of us who do use google andi those of us who do use google and i did put it out of the viewer is one day, are you able to not use google? when you think about google maps, gmail, searching, the various elements of bits and pieces that people have in their homes. the amount of data they have on us is off the scale. it is ubiquitous. most of us don't really have a heads around of it, it's just data, just information. if you can actually control what is that you are offered to buy, things you can have, actually he was going to impact on your life. example, if you're giving is like healthcare, all of those elements, they could be really positive things coming from that if they can direct the stuff to alternatively, there are companies that make their own rules and have no power over them. that is going to be the reason it is going to be very difficult and most of us be very difficult and most of us don't understand the strength and value of the data. basically, this is a new level of exposure for us brits, as you say, we can make up our own rules here will

has reached out to google for comment on the case we will let you know if and when they reply google has also already faced numerous such cases in australia just this month for example about us there was awarded half a $1000000.00 over online comments claiming that he gave false misleading advice in july of last year the tech giant was faced with a contempt of court charge for failing to remove reviews about a high profile sydney businessman we debated the issue here on r.t. with broadcaster karen turk and journalist and commentator chadwick moore. this guy had one negative review and this is how he wants to get the courts involved you want to put this in google you want to sue the guy i mean just take care of your own business right it's sort of ridiculous and this is also a massive slippery slope how long if we keep up this culture until you're no longer allowed to criticize google itself or if you do you're some other massive corporation i'm also all for free speech by you know it's given people a mask to hide behind and they're not taking responsibility for what's being posted an

assist with the war to the sea to cool for country we are you told your mother mother socially must google you call your old divide was always there or do us always fought for its own interests and. also this hour french politicians who welcomed a russian shock artist as a hero granting him political asylum now demand he sent back a lot of improvement after his arrest over an incident that brought down a key ally of president. and after an anonymous reviewer posts negative comments about must really in business when a court orders google to transfer all data about the incident to the victim we debate the issues raised of online freedom of speech. it's given people a mask to hide behind and they're not taking responsibility for what's being posted if you start trying to regulate all of this regulation and all of this forcing only goes in one direction but the power of these companies anymore they have so much power. plus people in the african nation of ghana are dying of cancer and other diseases as the west uses it as a dumping ground for electronic waste. a very warm welcome to the progra

going on it's actually a difficult position for google to be in. you know the trumpet ministration you know every every bureaucratic you know wanting to go after them plus all these industries that are ready to go on the hunt right now so i think google's already laureate up and that's probably a good thing because it's going to get i think pretty hot for them and no question i mean i don't question your free market guy right and so when you talk about antitrust it kind of infringes somewhat on that free market idea of the government going to come and get involved how do you balance that we've got to be quick here but how do you balance that with the fact that in the case of facebook and google they basically control the entire online internet advertising model and in doing so they're actually choking out content creators that are independent choky not anybody who really doesn't fit their world view how do you balance those 2 things and say you can't choke everyone else out but at the same time still maintaining free market or can you yeah this is

going on it's actually a difficult position for google to be. you know the champion ministration you know every every bureaucratic you know wanting to go after them plus all these industries that are ready to go on the hunt right now so i think google's already laureate up and that's probably a good thing because it's going to get i think pretty hot for them and no question i mean i don't question your free market right and so when you talk about antitrust it kind of infringes somewhat on that free market idea of the government going to come in to get involved how do you balance that we've got to be quick here but how do you balance that with the fact that in the case of facebook and google they basically control the entire online internet advertising model and in doing so they're actually choking out content creators that are independent choky not anybody who really doesn't fit their world view how do you balance those 2 things and say you can't choke everyone else out but at the same time still maintaining free market or can you yeah this is a

and european company products include apple's i phone google's android and microsoft's windows and even samsung t.v.'s which were turned into covert. microphone's even their own citizens aren't safe now increasingly we see that it's happening domestically and to do that. the n.s.a. specifically targets the communications of everyone even just some by default it collects them in its stomach filters the minute hand losses the minute measures them and it stores them for periods of time simply because that's the easiest most efficient and most valuable way to achieve these snowden took the revelations about crypto eiji even further comparing it with a formerly secret $10000000.00 contract between the n.s.a. and a major u.s. computer security firm it begs the question what info grabbing operations are still going on right now under our noses. to developments in the coronavirus break which has officially been named as coded 19 the week has been marked by the disease is 1st fatal case and side of asia in europe and 8 year old chinese tourist from who a province the at the center. died in franc

after an anonymous reviewer posts negative comments about an australian businessman a court orders google to transfer all data about the instant the victim we debate the issues raised up online freedom of speech. it's given people a mask to hide behind that they're not taking responsibility for what's being posted if you start trying to regulate all of this regulation and all of the supporting only goes in one direction but the power of these companies anymore they have so much power. and people in the african nation of ghana are dying of cancer and other diseases as the west uses it as a dumping ground for electronic waste party's video agency replete films people's conditions and the extremely toxic area. you're watching our 2 international coming to you live from the russian capital where it's just turned 10 am come to the program. the top level munich security conference has left transatlantic allies in discord and pose an existential questions over their alliance and vision with the event asking whether the west global role is on the slide the u.s. tried to unite partners with the tr

the other stuff is gravy for google. ad revenue is google. melissa: okay. stock getting hit right you now. down about 29 bucks after-hours. adam and russell, thanks to both of you. meanwhile focusing on the economy, president trump back in washington preparing to make his third state of the union address tomorrow night. what to expect from the president as the impeachment trial winds down on capitol hill. plus a lot more from out there in iowa. connell? connell: yes, we do have a lot more from out here in iowa. high-stakes in a key battleground state this evening. the caucuses could give vital momentum to the candidate that comes out on top. we'll talking about it. democratic contenders making a final pitch the last few days. we had a front row seat on the campaign trail. we'll show you that when we come back. i like liberty mutual. they get that no two people are alike and customize your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. what do you think? i don't see it. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ be stronger...

has reached out to google for comment on the case we will let you know if they reply google has already faced numerous such cases in australia just this month the barrister was awarded half a $1000000.00 over online comments claiming that he gave false and misleading advice and in july of last year the tech giant was faced with a contempt of court charges that was for failing to remove reviews about a high profile sydney businessman we debated this issue with broadcaster karen turk in journalist and commentator chadwick moore. this guy had one negative review and this is how he wants to get the courts involved you want to put this in google you want to sue the guy i mean just take care of your own business right it's sort of ridiculous and this is also a massive slippery slope how long if we keep up this culture until you're no longer allowed to criticize google itself or if you do you're some other massive corporation i'm also all for free speech by you know it's given people a mask to hide behind and they're not taking responsibility for what's being posted and they are hurting innoce

a groundbreaking ruling in australia google has been ordered to unmask the identity of an online user he posted a damning review of a dentist the anonymous post warned a teeth whitening service was extremely uncomfortable the dentist says his business was affected as a result although google initially refused to take down the comments the dentists lawyer says that reputations should not be unfairly damaged. i believe it's extremely unfair that people are allowed to anonymously attack on is hardworking small businesses we think google has a duty of care to australian small businesses and business is globally for allowing these reviews to go on this ruling is groundbreaking well google has historically argued it's not responsible for user generated content and has only taken down negative posts in the past when ordered to do so by the courts under straightly in law businesses with fewer than 10 employees can see were over statements that could damage a company's reputation r.t. has reached out to google how to comment on this case or more bring you their response when we get it the mean

after an anonymous reviewer posts negative comments about an australian businessman a court orders google to transfer all the data about the incident to the victim we debate the issues raised online freedom of speech it's given people a mask to hide behind that they're not taking responsibility for what's being posted if you start trying to regulate all of this regulation and all of the support that only goes in one direction but the power of these companies anymore they have so much power. good afternoon and welcome to the program this is r t international coming to you live from the russian capital bring you your live news update. transatlantic allies appear in disarray at the top level munich security conference and some are now even posing questions on nato's vision and very existence with the details here's peter all for. one of the takeaways from this year's munich security conference was the a crisis of identity that seems to be going on with western nations i asked the people here on the streets of munich what they thought about transatlantic friction in the alliance the ideas of

google news labs has committed $350 million or so to the google news initiative. google gives out that money. they make partnerships with organizations. they make decisions about who gets it and who doesn't. and for a long time what google's done when they've experienced backlash about their policies or their algorithms not prioritizing full articles, they've deprioritized the news sites that have complained. and so that's not good enough. the technology companies have helped create this problem, and they have admitted to it. there's been a big mea culpa moment. we all saw mark zuckerberg sitting before congress saying, shit, i know that cambridge analytica did some bad stuff, we had a hand in that, that's kind of our fault, but they haven't really given back. they haven't really systematized the response to this problem. they've done some things and they've been working hard in many ways. but it's not enough. it's really important that we remember these are multibillion dollar companies, some of the richest companies in the world. they get treated more like natio

>> it is google home, google assistant, hey, google do this, hey google, put this together, hey google, remember. that goes somewhere added to your profile. then google can do what they want with it, about you, towards, with you. stuart: they're recording all of this? >> of course. stuart: google, do it, that the other or show me this, that other, they choose what they do with it? >> sure. stuart: are they under some restriction you can't sell this to the russians or something? >> so they say but as reagan says, speaking to the russians, trust but verify. stuart: what would you do about this? >> right now you shouldn't give them anything. if possible don't give google anything. don't give photos or information. stuart: come on, matthew, you know as well as i do the home things are ubiquitous, amazon or google, doesn't matter. they're here. they're not going away. there is nothing you can do about it? >> you cannot buy that device. you can switch to other platforms. look, apple is actually more trustworthy than google. that is their entire platform. they have taken to counter to google.

google, tell us the real numbers, help us out there they put things in context google cloud is going well, but there's a clear winner in cloud computing, and aws added more revenue this last year than microsoft azure or google cloud combined or just about the same amount no evidence google cloud is gaining share. youtube has a great growth profile going forward. it's undermonetized and still the future of television for most people on this planet i think it's great asset google is handing it well. >> mark, any clarity yet on the sindar era he's been at google for a long time, now at alphabet. is it a coincidence they gave these metrics in his first earnings call with this much power? did they do it because the results are weak or because he doesn't want to be more transparent or challenge these businesses the grow? >> i think it's all of the above, actually. cloud was expected they've made a lot of announcements around that they want to be a serious player in cloud, they want to be top two if you want to do that with azure and aws, you have to do the same thing youtube was a bit of a

one is apple, one is microsoft, one is google, one is amazon you have amazon, google, apple and microsoft. you have an a, g, a, m, you have a maga >> heath is joining us from the global conference. congratulations as always on the conference good to talk to you. >> great, thanks, carl great to be here. >> you don't cover all of the names in that group but you cover a lot of them. i wonder is it any different covering them or is there more responsibility how much is the market relying on the fates of those four companies? >> we look, those are our tech leaders. that's what the market is looking to in a lot of ways when you talk to investors, those have become market stocks. they're reflective of the direction the market is going and reflective very much on investor sentiment on where they expect the market to go. >> let's talk a little e-commerce, heath. you guys cover amazon, ebay and etsy but not shopify why not? >> we actually do cover shopify it's our software analyze covers it, because it's more of a sass model versus a real transactional model, the other companies i personally cover

google hasn't applied to be part of this year's play, but organizers say if google does, the door is open. >> tonight, the board decided not to ban google or anybody else from the parade. >> reporter: san francisco pride parade executive director fred lopez says the controversy to ban google from this year's parade began at a january 15th meeting. that's when members of sf pride voted to keep google out. but that vote was nonbinding. >> i regret the fact that within our community, we're fighting against each other when we don't have to. >> reporter: the board president addressed that vote and the concerns over how google treats its lbtg employees. >> i think that some action needs to be taken. there's incredible amounts of transphobia online, and it seems to just go. >> reporter: she says they have met with google and seen immediate changes. she says it's best to work from within than to ban an important community partner. >> everyone is saying we want to be in your parade. but this is what they are saying about the organization and we're going to hold their feet to the fire. >> repo

app available on smartphones through google play the apple app store by searching for the t.v. or stream is to your t.v. by downloading the portable t.v. apple on apple t.v. and online it portable dot tv t.v. is coming to more devices very soon i guess you call it and legit scam as always you can hit us up at youtube dot com slash boom bust our t. and we see you back here next time. you will be a reflection of reality. in the world transformed. what will make you feel safe. isolation because you don't see. you going the right way. so. what is true. what's his fate. in the world corrupted you need to descend. to join us in the depths. for a mate in the shallows. and we're going to fulfill the repeated promises apologise to the people and promise to be you know we've all pots the. pretty rough. cut. that you want to 1st. know. all. cut. up by you thinking of getting your music on the ones we've got and she was signaling still trapped in this time you know wired we don't need a crate with him he will just. freaking out he won't let us bring him anywhere near and thousands of breed

now in a groundbreaking ruling in australia google has been ordered to unmask the identity of an online user who posted a damning review of a dentist the anonymous post went on the teeth whitening service was extremely uncomfortable at the dentist says his business was affected as a result but google initially refused to take down the comments the dentist lawyer says that reputations should not be unfairly damaged. i believe it's extremely unfair that people are allowed to anonymously attack honest hardworking small businesses we think google has a duty of care to australian small businesses and business is globally for allowing these reviews to go on this ruling is groundbreaking google has historically argued it's not responsible for user generated content and has only taken down negative posts when ordered to do so by the courts under australian law businesses with fewer than 10 employees can sue over statements that could damage a company's reputation well we have reached out to google to comment on the case and we'll bring you their response when they give it now in the meantime go

to comment on the case and we await their response in the meantime google has already faced a number of similar cases in australia just this month for example a barrister was awarded half a $1000000.00 start over online comments claiming that he gave false and misleading advice and in july of last year the tech giant was faced with a contempt of court charge that for failing to remove reviews about a high profile sydney businessman is an issue that we put up for debate. this guy had one negative review and this is how he wants to get the courts involved you want to put this in google you want to sue the guy i mean just take care of your own business right it's sort of ridiculous and this is also a massive slippery slope how long if we keep up this culture until you're no longer allowed to criticize google itself or if you do you're some other massive corporation i'm also all for free speech by you know it's given people a mask to hide behind and they're not taking responsibility for what's being posted and they are hurting innocent people and this is becoming way too widespread denti

accountability there will be will that mean that people are restricted 'd to only using google esque sites for instance that remains to be question what data will be collected in the process of connecting people i put some of these questions to charles he made it clear he couldn't say much more about lou after all he doesn't work for that company he did tell me this though about google's approach to darkly. so what we do at google is we ensure that we have employed a user trust that is something that's really important and that users understand exactly what we're doing with the data about we have on them we also ensure that they're able to manage and control so transparency ability to manage and control the data that we have on our users is really critical and when it's so transparent people get to joy the magic of google just uses a lot of positive p.r. speak especially when it comes to discussing matters relating to data that doesn't come as a big surprise because data ownership access privacy is incredibly sensitive legal and political issues across the world governments and regul

google's mission from the get go was to really get a lot of the africans who are offline online and to make sure they get online in a more affordable and have better conduct content as well as relevance and the mission around noon is to ensure that we are able to deliver connectivity to the most remote parts of the continent and around the world so i am proud to say that here in kenya is the 1st commercial agreement between noon our sister company and telco kenya we're amazed to be seen is what standards of. accountability there will be will that mean that people are restricted 'd to only using google esque sites for instance that remains to be question what data will become acted in the process of connecting people i put some of these questions to charles he made it clear he couldn't say much more about luke after all he doesn't work for that company he did tell me this though about google's approach to data collection. so what we do at google is we ensure that we have employed a user trust that is something that's really important and that users understand exactly what we're doing

has reached out to google for comment on the case and will let you know if they reply google has already faced numerous such cases in australia just this month a barrister was awarded half a $1000000.00 over online comments claiming that he gave false and misleading advice and in july of last year the tech giant was faced with a contempt of court charge for failing to remove remove her views about a high profile sydney businessman we debated the issue with broadcaster karen turk and journalist and commentator chadwick moore. this guy had one negative review and this is how he wants to get the courts involved you want to put this in google you want to sue the guy i mean just take care of your own business right it's sort of ridiculous and this is also a massive slippery slope how long if we keep up this culture until you're no longer allowed to criticize google itself or if you do you're some other massive corporation i'm also all for free speech by you know it's given people a mask to hide behind and they're not taking responsibility for what's being posted and they are hurting innocent

that could damage a company's reputation we did reach out to google to comment on the. time well google has already faced a number of similar cases in australia just this month for example a barrister was awarded half a $1000000.00 online comments claiming he gave a misleading and in july last year the tech giant google was charged with contempt for failing to remove reviews about a business meant we put the she's put the bait. this guy had one negative review and this is how he wants to get the courts involved you want to put this in google you want to sue the guy i mean just take care of your own business right it's sort of ridiculous and this is also a massive slippery slope how long if we keep up this culture until you're no longer allowed to criticize google itself or if you do you're some other massive corporation also offer free speech by you know it's given people a mask to hide behind and they're not taking responsibility for what's being posted and they are hurting innocent people and this is becoming way too widespread dentist comes up is foolish it's a bit u

app available on smartphones through google play in the apple app store by searching portable t.v. or stream is to your t.v. by downloading the portable t.v. app on apple t.v. and online it portable da t.v. t.v. is coming to more devices very soon i guess you call it and then scale as always you can hit us up at youtube dot com slash boom bust r.t. and we'll see you back here next time. so the politicians have basically stuck the american public with the delegate to negotiate for drugs and both parties who are financed very heavily by the pharmaceutical industry have done this so when your own people vote they should look at how much does this politician get from the power pharmaceutical industry. banks geysers financial survival guide. housing bubble. oh you mean there's a downside to artificially low mortgage rates don't get carried away that's cause report. and i need another one to. sway the both the food. bank itself mukti if i. was in this way got to do all. the things in the med to dismiss the market. and i don't miss so much and if. this is the only thing that we do is musi

app available on smartphones through google play and the apple app store by searching portable t.v. or stream is to your t.v. by downloading the portable t.v. app on apple t.v. and online it portable da t.v. t.v. is coming to more devices very soon i guess you could call it and legit scam as always you can have this up at youtube dot com slash boom bust our t. and we see you back here next time. we're going to fulfill that promise is possible for the people. you know we've all bought the. pretty rough. now you want to work. on no. all the. big. thinking of getting your music on the ones we got in our shoes no problem was as he didn't know until he was trapped in this tiny little wired coach you don't need a crate with him he will just stir reaching out into the wall when it's freedom anywhere near and thousands of breeding dogs are caged in the in 2 main conditions on puppy farms i mean 67 years you know they've been locked up in a cage outside you see no protection from the weather the heat you know the cold air the rain the snow the funder nothing they have no protection. because

think of some of the biggest companies in the world today there is google amazon microsoft facebook we chat all of them big tech with algorithms at their. whim or they just uses all customers will these businesses would generate is a dot and they need us to like them for them to be indispensable because the more that we use them the more doubt of reproduce we're in the midst of a great race for dot and big tech companies are on the chase. for the past 3 years academics nichol dri analysts have been investigating a phenomenon they call datta colonialism. while the modes scales and context may have changed they say colonialism same underlying functions of empire building extraction and appropriation remain the new lang grab going on there's not land that's being grabbed it's us it's human life the acquisition of the construction of data valuable data for corporate use out of the flow of our lives that's the lag right going on and that's why the work is the only one who does justice to that let's think for instance of all the and use her license agreements or the terms of use that we read

has reached out to google for comment on the case and will let you know if they do reply google has already faced numerous such cases in australia just this month a barrister was awarded half a $1000000.00 over online comments last year at the tech giant face a contempt of court charge for failing to remove reviews about a high profile businessman we debated the issue with broadcaster karen turk and journalist chadwick moore. this guy had one negative review and this is how he wants to get the courts involved you want to put this in google you want to sue the guy i mean just take care of your own business right it's sort of ridiculous and this is also a massive slippery slope how long if we keep up this culture until you're no longer allowed to criticize google itself or if you do you're some other massive corporation also offer free speech by you know it's given people a mask to hide behind and they're not taking responsibility for what's being posted and they are hurting innocent people and this is becoming way too widespread dentist to be comes up is foolish it's a bit unhinged if he thi

google hasn't applied to be part of this year's play, but organizers say if google does, the door is open. >> tonight, the board decided not to ban google or anybody else from the parade. >> reporter: san francisco pride parade executive director fred lopez says the controversy to ban google from this year's parade began at a january 15th meeting. that's when members of sf pride voted to keep google out. but that vote was nonbinding. >> i regret the fact that within our community, we're fighting against each other when we don't have to. >> reporter: the board president addressed that vote and the concerns over how google treats its lbtg employees. >> i think that some action needs to be taken. there's incredible amounts of transphobia online, and it seems to just go. >> reporter: she says they have met with google and seen immediate changes. she says it's best to work from within than to ban an important community partner. >> everyone is saying we want to be in your parade. but this is what they are saying about the organization and we're going to hold their feet to the fire. >> repo