straight to the united states. especially to places like miami. the policy for cuban refugees at this time was such that these refugees would be given asylum as part of a bigger anti-castro, anti-communist policy. a number of requirements were imposed on these early refugee populations. these requirements illustrated how the united states pursued its own cold war self-interest. first, as i have mentioned, the u.s. offered a special welcome for people fleeing communism. second, a preference was given for refugees who were professionals or highly educated or skilled. this was in keeping with other immigration laws of the period. ultimately, while welcoming displaced people has been seen as a humanitarian act, these humanitarian efforts were often centered on the needs of the united states, the helper. these images future refugees who arrived in the united states during this period. the photo on the left features displaced persons who were registering at an emergency refugee center which housed 1,000 people displaced

many have worked on behalf of the united states. we have a moral imperative to protect them, to support those who have supported this nation. we have the obligation to do so anyway to protect national security and preserves public safety. at fort lee, one of the military bases designated to receive vulnerable afghan nationals, i heard two stories that help communicate the meaning of our operation and the meaning of our country. when families arrived fort lee, the children are given an american flag. the afghan men place their hands over their hearts out of respect , ingratitude, and in reverence. i met with a federal government employee who was working at fort lee to help afghan nationals in the process. the employee served in afghanistan in 2009 and 2010. he was supported by an afghan national who worked as his interpreter. the employee has kept in touch with the interpreter for the past 10 years. last week, he assisted the interpreter in assisting with her immigration papers. as we move forward through this process, these individu

the united states. and from the very beginning, from 1607. when the irish famine people came, it was already created. it was pretty much set in stone. they were taking half of mexico and sort of completing that vision that they had on independence was to reach the pacific and come to dominate the pacific as chinese trade. >> your argument in a way is that it's not really a nation of immigrants sort of an economic expansionist class that later turned against immigrants. >> turned against immigrants but they don't this industrial powerhouse first of all with a cotton kingdom. slavery was legal. enslaved africans had this unpaid labor force and they kept reproducing slaves so they didn't have a labor issue. but after the civil war when they really started building the industrial northeast, they needed huge amounts of labor and also for building the railroads. so this is when the first immigration law ever passed or was ever mentioned immigration was 1883. that was to exclude chinese who at the same time th

the united states will compete and will compete vigorously. and lead with our values and our strength. we'll stand up for our allies and our friends and oppose attempts by stronger countries that dominate weaker ones whether through changes to territory by force, economic coercion, technical exploitation, or disinformation. but we are not seeking, say it again, we are not seeking a new cold war or a world divided in the ridged blocks. the united states is ready to work with any nation that steps up and pursues peaceful resolution to shared challenges. even if we have intense disagreements in other areas. because we'll all suffer the consequences of our failure if we do not come together to address the urgent threats like covid-19 and climate change or enduring threats like nuclear proliferation. the united states remains committed to preventing iran from gaining a nuclear weapon. we are working with the p-5-plus one to engage iran diplomatically and seek a return to jcpoa. we are prepared to return to full compliance if iran does the same. sim

states and those seeking entry to united states. i then conclude with the trump administration and extreme vetting. now some might recall that during the campaign that president -- then republican nominee donald trump, one of his campaign speeches, there was a reference to the cold war and the call for extreme vetting. there is a reference in the book that i include in the book where he says is, well, he says ideological restrictions in the cold war and need extreme vetting. i remember watching that and going my goodness. let's see what happens. and lo and behold, during the trump administration, we have seen efforts to exclude and to deport a extreme vetting that is strikingly similar. what has changed is technology. during the social media, data collection and use of social media, there's a real concern that your affiliations, what you like on twitter, or facebook, expression that you carry around in your pocket and on you at all times through the laptop, through the social media handles and accounts can be used against you. eithe

into the united states. and as we discussed a couple of weeks ago the secretary of state even expunged the nazi records of people like werner von brown and some of his fellow nazi scientists so that they could work in us intelligence. and verna von braun and his fellow his team of scientists played a key role in the development of the us space program. but refugees also informed our political life. think of henry kissinger madeleine albright the german political theorist hannah arendt they have played a key role but there are others they've played a cube role in shaping our political life. they've shaped our cultural life think of the actress, marlena dietrich. the hungarian composer bella bartok the austrian composer arnold stormberg and the russian french painter mark sagal but there are many many other refugees that we could highlight refugees have always played an important role in the political economic and cultural life of our nation. but public opinion polls tell us that americans were very concerned

international diplomacy and the united states. look at situation in the central eurasia central asia. i didn't know southeast asia from the position of economic interest bod, 1st to fall from the perspective of its felicia shapes, with china and russia. it's not about the regions, it's about the great power of the game. and that's, that makes the american participation less productive them. we could have believed that makes the united states nor to solution. but the problem in the united states, in many of its doctrinal documents, is describing russia nowadays as a disruptor and disrupting power. and do you think that's essentially a projection, they're describing us in a way what they're trying to do to this region, disrupting it for the lack of better word who i don't think it is a project. so i think that is normal diplomatic practice for the great powers. if we recognize that the other great power is the contributor, not to disrupt her, it means that we have problems about establishing our own position. because only between th

united states is a good source of -- to pakistan. united states is probably one of the most influential dynamic pakistani -- in the world. and i've made this point several times in the past, also. there are so many non-tangible factors. the fact that we use the same accounting practices that you do. they use english language is communication. i know that is important for the u.s. and pakistan is one of the largest -- on the indian ocean rim. and we have a good history of maritime cooperation also. and that is really where we would like the economic partnership, trade partnership, investment partnership bringing more balance to them. they announced this question about counterterrorism. we have cooperated in the past. this is certainly an idea where i believe our interests would remain aligned, you know, because of what you just said in terms of some turbulence spilling over into pakistan. and isis-k is a common threat by practically everybody including taliban. similarly, al qaeda has attacked us in the past. and i do want to take thi

united states -- of the united states security is without question, our support for an independent jewish state is unequivocal. i continue to believe that a two-state solution is the best way to ensure israel's future as a jewish democratic state, living in peace alongside of viable sovereign and democratic palestinian state. we are a long way from that goal at this moment. but we must never allow ourselves to give up on the possibility of progress. we cannot give up on solving raging civil conflicts, including in ethiopia and yemen. we are fighting between warring parties is driving famine, horrific violence, human rights violations against civilians, including answer constant use of rape as a weapon of war. we'll continue to work with international community to press for peace and bring an end to this suffering. as we pursue diplomacy across the board, the united states will champion the democratic values that go to the very heart of who we are as a nation and people. freedom, equality, opportunity, and a belief in the universal rights of all people. it's stamped into our d.n.a. as a na

the united states will do our part. we more successful a more impactful if all of our nations are working toward the full mission, to which we are called. that's why we're the 100 nations united. we get around a shared statement. the security council adopted a resolution outlining how will support the people of afghanistan moving forward, laid out the expectations to which will hold the tale bond. when it comes to respecting universal human rights. we all was to advocate for women, the rights of women and girls to use their full talents to contribute economically, politically and socially, and pursue their dreams free of violence and intimidation from central america, the middle east, africa, daph, galveston, wherever it appears in the world where almost call out and condemn the targeting and oppression racial, ethnic and religious minorities. when it occurs in whether carson sion, john or northern european, or anywhere in the world, we almost defend the rights of l, g, b, t, q i, individuals. so they can live in love,

it's a threat to the united states militarily -- maybe not in terms the united states being invaded and conquered, no, that's likely not going to happen. but it's still a military threat, we can be damaged by imperial japan and nazi germany. and perhaps even more significantly, it's an economic threat to our well-being. if the nazis dominate europe and control the natural resources, of europe if the japanese conquer and control the resources of asia, what will we do? you can say we'll trade with them, but what if they don't trade with us, what if they isolate us economically, how do we grow and prosper. remember 1939 1940, the great depression is not fully over yet. it's gotten better, but it's still on. americans are really concerned about their economic well-being, this argument says we might be in a state of permanent depression. we may not have any capacity for growth in a world dominated by nazi germany and imperial japan. this is a threat to democracy for, us we are in danger. our whole way of life can be destroyed by world dominated, by these dictatorships. the interventionists a

i mean, that could fund a lot of teachers and infrastructure here in the united states. so, i mean, i think it's pretty significant commitments. and i think we see that the, by the ministration is focused on china and russia, the major adversaries of the united states. and we're going to see more of this, i think, you know, with taiwan, the u. s. has been providing extensive arm sales to taiwan and trying to counter china. so that seems to be that the focal point right now. and you know, they want to extract themselves from middle east. so i do have this question 2500000000. you're right. that is a lot of dollars and a lot of money that i think here domestically in the u. s. that could be used in places, but to $5000000000.00. what is actually being? is that money being used for in ukraine? can you see it on the ground? what are the ukrainians doing with $2500000.00 or $1000000000.00 worth of american taxpayer dollars? well, i think you raise afghan stands, a similar situation where the money is kind of going into black hole. i mean, the war in eastern ukraine is like th

and the united states. but let me be clear australia is not seeking to acquire nuclear weapons or establish a civil nuclear capability. and we will continue to meet all our nuclear non-proliferation obligations. australia has a long history of defense cooperation with the united states and the united kingdom. for more than a century, we have stood together for the cause of peace and freedom, motivated by the beliefs we share, sustained by the bonds of friendship we have forged, enabled by the sacrifice of those who have gone before us, and inspired by our shared hope for those who will follow us. but let me be clear and so, today, friends, we recommit ourselves to this cause and a new aukus vision. i'm delighted to join president biden and prime minister to announce that the united kingdom, australia, and the united states are creating a new trilateral defense partnership, known as aukus, with the aim of working hand in glove to preserve security and stability in the indo-pacific. and prime minister morriso

can you elaborate some of those training instances the united states in had -- united states had in training soldiers? guest: and a lot of confidential interviews are pretty scathing about the afghan army and police. the afghan police are different from what we have here, this was a paramilitary police force built to protect territory from the taliban. what you hear again and again from u.s. military trainers and advisers is just what an enormously difficult task this was to build up an enormous afghan army and police force that more than 90% of their crews were literate. they cannot read. many of them could not count. they did not know numbers. some of them did not know their colors. so we are trying to train these people in a few weeks out to be soldiers or police and it just was not going well. you hear drill instructors say the afghans couldn't shoot straight, that they deserted at high rates, that they were infiltrated by tele-band supervisors -- taliban supervisors. in the interview with the people doing the training and equipping, they were predicting the afghan army is not going to l

so these are again radical black activists in the united states. again for the overwhelming majority of american people, like the pacifists, this is a group that could essentially be dismisseds, these guys are radical, they have some overarching complaint about u.s. policy, whatever, and like the pacifists are not heard on the nightly news, not reported in "the new york times" or "time" magazine, there is a fairly narrow window of mass media at this point so it is hard to get your voice into those few niches where you can be heard by more than a few hundred or thousand people. so these kind of people are not being loudly heard or really barely heard at all. they're dismissable. pacifists. black radical activists worried about imperialism. the third group that speaks out at this time is the nascent new left we talked about. those white radicals that are 1964 and '65 relatively few in number. many of them associated with the students for democratic society. that group that was formed back in 1960 and then began to spread throughout other campuses aro

in the case of the united states. neutrality will, for the most part, mean that they will do business with whoever and the very willingness to do business with both germans, or rather the central powers, and the allies, is proof of their neutrality. so a lot of people were surprised to learn that at the beginning of the war, the u.s. traded with, and maintained diplomatic relations with, all of the belligerent nations. some of those relationships were strange to be sure. one of my favorite examples is the one of both the first and last ottoman empire ambassador appointed to the united states, alfred dublin ski, a polish turk. he is appointed to d.c. and is given one instruction on his departure from constant novel, and you know from our work earlier in the semester, that can stall tunnel, in, itself is a hotly contested zone. so they tell him, go to the states and all you have to do is be charming, all you have to do is have fabulous parties, the fabulous guest, and by all means, avoid any social or political tensions

section 1381 of title 18 of the united states code provides that whoever entices or procures or attempts to entice or procure any person in the armed forces to desert therefrom or aids any such person in deserting or attempt to go desert shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than three years or both. the same chapters and punishments are applicable to a person convicted of harboring or assisting a known deserter. knowingly or willingly advocating, abetting, advising or teaching the overthrow of the destruction of the government of the united states or any state by force or violence is prohibited and is punishable by a fine of not more than $20,000 or imprisonment for more than 20 years or both. this statute is violated by the publication, circulation and or distribution of matter advocating the forceable overthrow of the government. as well as organizing a society for that purpose. and the same punishment is applicable. second 2387 of the same title provides for a $10,000 fine or ten years in imprisonment or both for whoever with intent to interfere with, impair or i

did you ever expect that the united states, it's nato allies, would end? what has now been a 20 year military campaign there and leave the country to that group. you've just mentioned the same tara group that they went there to defeat. you know, lots of people are saying they were surprised by the decision. i suppose now people are saying, well, joe biden was against obama serge, which is obviously so destructive of the lives of millions of africa, ordinary africans, president obama comes out of his story as one of the most evil president of the united states. according to afghans on the ground, you saw the surgeon in all its in all its har roofing atrocious, las, and as to whether we expected it is a testament to joe biden. because joe biden did go against the vested interests of big, profitable companies, where this recycling of money the julian assigned, so famously talks about the whole forever war system, whereby people who are poor and dispossessed to the united states pay their sales tax. and somehow that is recycled in this massive money laundromat

united states -- of the united states security is without question, our support for an independent jewish state is unequivocal. i continue to believe that a two-state solution is the best way to ensure israel's future as a jewish democratic state, living in peace alongside of viable sovereign and democratic palestinian state. we are a long way from that goal at this moment. but we must never allow ourselves to give up on the possibility of progress. we cannot give up on solving raging civil conflicts, including in ethiopia and yemen. we are fighting between warring parties is driving famine, horrific violence, human rights violations against civilians, including answer constant use of rape as a weapon of war. we'll continue to work with international community to press for peace and bring an end to this suffering. as we pursue diplomacy across the board, the united states will champion the democratic values that go to the very heart of who we are as a nation and people. freedom, equality, opportunity, and a belief in the universal rights of all people. it's stamped into our d.n.a. as a na

it is in the united states with them too. for the house republicans, we hold that policymakers and south korea would realize that the interest is best served by working with united states, and we hold china accountable for its behavior. unfair trade practices, sponsorship of genocide -- as you know we talk specifically about the uighur population. i am a sponsor of the uighur policy act. china's uighur population is in a genocide. these are things we need to bring to life and really keep china accountable. as for the proposed alliance, there are years of goodwill. these are two countries -- united states and south korea. we stare a strong bond, and we value the strength of that relationship. we should recognize that in the face of those who seek to undermine those values. i am sure you have additional thoughts. rep. bera: yes. playing off of congresswoman kim, there is a message that we certainly need to deliver to the koreans, which i think is how the koreans are looking at it, is not a question of the united states and chin

well, the united states has this hearty frontier culture. this idea, you can always flee west and remake yourself even though that's a bootstrap apology. we have the ethnic and racial divides. the hyper capitalist class was always able to divide the working class against itself, either racially or ethnically or regionally. and then there was a sustained effort by the government to suppress socialism here. so i think there's a lot of reasons why we didn't develop a sort of left wing like europe. it. eugene debs low is one of those important forgotten figures because he ease fights class warfare. what he does on a democratic ways of democratic socialists. he speaks a lot like a christian actually, even though he's not one, he respects religion and you know, when he's sentenced a federal prison for opposing the draft and giving a speech on this edition act during world war one. i have fooled more than one person who is a self proclaimed conservative person by quoting what he said to the judge to them and asking who said it. and many times i've

the friction between the united states and world leaders over afghanistan. the creation of that security group that is supplying nuclear submarines to australia that includes the u. k. it includes australia. it includes the united states, not france, which has made the very unhappy what the white house press secretary is saying is that these new restrictions are the result of an ongoing review of protocols. 2 that were inherited by the trump administration, kept in place by the, by the administration. until now. basically what she's saying is that the united states is following the science. and they now feel that it's ok for vaccinated travelers to come into the united states if they can prove that within 72 hours of their flight. they've tested negative for covert 19. so she insist that this is something that has been in the worst for some time. but given the fact that the u. s. president has been dealing with some uncomfortable tensions between the united states and european allies over those issues. i mentioned and now have to head up to the un general as

well, those companies are based here in the united states. the d o j says it's putting the nearly $15000000000.00 deal on hold over national security concert. this is just one of the investigations, the us government is pursuing against zoom over what it claims are substantial operations in china. the company that went viral last year for making it possible for many americans to work from home and also go to school from home. is now the subject of federal investigations in both new york and california over the way it stores data and it's interactions with the chinese government zoom has cooperated with the investigations while also noting that its company is based here in the us . and seo is a us citizen, for now, it remains unclear what will be the result of the investigation as the d o j looks to challenge this deal with $59.00. and it's interesting, i mean, this is something similar, obviously why way was a chinese company, but it's like if you have operations in china, you are going to face government scrutiny here in the united states. t

to me displace a pit, am i what the united states was doing in afghanistan? they were bringing people to this torture sight afghans ordering africa and abusing them outside of the rule of law and then allowing some of them to go back home. and they would go home and tell people this is what the americans did. by the time i got to guantanamo, i was begging to go to the tunnel because what i've seen and witnessed in belgrade was so destructive to this day. i haven't, i can't sleep. oh i . several of us were sent to one tournament including several taliban members. who now heads of various departments in the act and government were tortured. we were stripped, we were beaten, was back upon. we were humiliated photographs. this was taken during this period of time. they had a found a woman in the next room that led me to believe was my wife being tortured. they waved with pictures of my children in front of me and asked me where do you think they are now, what do you think happened to them? the night and took your way. and of course what they wanted me to do was t

they were investigating the united states, the african national army, and the taliban. the only ones who responded by threatening the international criminal court was the united states of america. they said that we will sanction all members of the national committee court. we will arrest any members of the icpc who come to the usa or elsewhere that want to investigate us. i think the united states of america needs to step back if it wants to help any of any assistance to the people who understand it's got in a position to negotiate those conditions. it has, it has been an aggressor. the taliban already made gestures towards russia towards china to it's the wrong to it's passed on to within an easier would be like states and britain in particular. i think that feeling very upset because this is a defeat that's a military defeat. however, you want to look at it and not imperial hubris, as it were, will not allow them to say that we need to move forward and continue within negotiations that we began in doha, that they cannot be any more saber rattling. it's no good for the

states trained unit? >> that's correct. what happened ultimately on august 14th has lots of history. i know it's convenient to pretend that didn't happen. i know that we want to give ourselves sort of the pleasure of attacking a political leader of the other party. and so let me engage in that too. i'm going to assert that the events of all 14th have the direct antecede went a bad decision by president trump and secretary pompeo in 2018 to he will vaut and legitimatize the taliban in doha, qatar by bringing that face-to-face negotiations. that tragedy was compounded by an unbelievable decision to exclude the government of afghanistan. we were defending them from those very negotiations. is that an accurate statement, mr. secretary? >> certainly that's what we inherited. >> but afghanistan -- the afghan government was in fact excluded from the negotiating table in doha by the trump administration, is that not correct? >> that is essentially correct, yes. >> when the 5,000 people were released from prison s

but imagine if in the united states, russian companies had new vice, that would allow voters in the united states to find out how russia would like them to vote. that will be a huge scandal. you know, we all remember russian gauge was and i think it was a fortune for american viewers for at least 2 and a half years until april, 2020. when basically mr. miller, mr. miller, acknowledge that there was no confusion. but we have evidence of western total support from the radical position in russia. you're just have to read the newspapers in the west, not in russia, the ah, transparency for the powerful premises and the bell this bit about privacy. what people care about is power tuning and sons is become a symbol of the battles of brevity. information is power. that's what's going on and a huge struggle with the government's corporations who want to keep information secret and others who the democratic rights should be pushed forward. and people have a writing, everything to do, watch sons helped to shift the conversation around transparency and see what that battle has done to him. i feel like

k is working more closely with united states and australia. so this is something that sending a seismic shake wave across europe and macro and it's an election year for him. he has to act very tough on the international stage, or at least domestically in france. and i think that all of these things have added up, that we've seen an olive branch being sent out by president biden to macro. and i think that the statement, it actually gave peg from across everything he pretty much wanted. he wanted more support in the hell which he's getting. and there was a lot of talk about ending a very important e u. u. s. cooperation schemes. for example, the upcoming technology cooperation council was going to be cancelled because the french were so upset. but i think we should be careful not to complete, complete france with the e u, because it's a bilateral trade issue. and it's not that everyone in the us necessarily supporting france on this. ok and manual. do you agree with that? particularly the bit about sending extra help to this. i held a statement

united states military will always honor their heroism. we mourn with their families and we owe them support through the days and years ahead. it is noteworthy that, on the day of the attack at the airport, our troops and their partners start and carried on, putting 89 rescue flights into the air in the span of 24 hours. they lifted 12,500 souls to freedom. it is an enormous achievement, not just by the military, but also by the military of our afghan partners. of course, buyer teammate at the state department. the wars over -- the wars over, and we are entering a new chapter. one where our diplomats take the lead. we are part of an urgent team effort to move afghan evacuees out of temporary housing in intermediate staging bases in the gulf and in europe. they are moving on to begin new lives. i will be traveling to the gulf next week to thank our partners there who have done so much to save and shelter afghan civilians. now, some of those brave afghans will be coming to make new lives in america. after's -- after's careful screening by ou

they don't want to war, but united states, i don't think united states wants a war with them. they know what the ultimate consequence of that could be, that they want to continue to bully their way through the china is building and the united states is bombing now. they just lost. they had to leave. afghanistan was never, there's to lose. they, in their parlance, they've lost have dentist and that's a key piece for the chinese belt remote initiative. so as they pull out of that, china continues to bring in the rest of the world around infrastructure and development and not to say george had some good critiques of try. there's no question about that. but the united states has to join in this world and join as an equal partner with others. and i, and until they do that, we're all our trouble. we're in a lot of a dangerous situation where things can get out of hand in the south china sea in particular, but there still flash 4 inch in, in europe as well. still. so this is a situation that us people, i think it's in their hands to pressure their government. i'm not expecting that t

how many women, women, and children has the united states killed? and so the problem is when the united states considers its violence more moral and just moral in general, it allows it to justify and legitimize massive states while it ok mama, i'm going to share the conversation with you with your, your cope. harness. kimberly, go ahead. well i, i fully agree, i mean, and this was to the point i was making earlier. is that what we've seen the war on terror due by the united states going in with, you know, with murdering with impunity? it's, we've seen the rise of other types of extremist groups. for example, in iraq, we saw the rise of islamic state, and the united states continues even as joe biden has just said that afghan stan has wrapped up. it hasn't wrapped up because what still going are the draw strikes that have been killing that not just the so called terrorist which by the way, you know, never had a trial were never properly charged for never afforded the, the rights that the us constitution affords to american citizens just just killed w

united states objectives here would have got to start. there are those who are celebrating 911 again. we have seen multiple fly works also over the last several days, the taliban has announced the new government with, with many of the officials nominated by the taliban to leave this new slab mc emory of got to stop. there will form a guantanamo. it may set for autumn inmates as well as other people who have bounties, who have american dieties on their heads. many people more than a dozen at international terrorists, the tide about his obviously foes emboldened by military success. how quickly i took over the country. it has made no compromise in its it's roaster for the new government. so there was speculation that perhaps the type of bad would include minorities would include women and it's new governments as i get a quote from us to the west, west and above. no such thing. what we're seeing is a government that was in power. on the day before the us invaded i, they have the same organization though i must say, a different shape of talib

the united states movement plan. and the experience shows that the diplomacy of the united states is not innovative at all. they just want to resolve all the problems with, with force or question. and they also see the, the, the war, the real war, the like hollywood movie and they just take arm to resolve the problem. but the result is that they just make a mess where they go. but you don't think with the 20 year anniversary of $911.00, the americans would realize that they can't use fundamentalist islam. islam keep funding these sorts of groups against their perceived enemies. yeah, because they wouldn't, they have to think a little bit. it's not just if you have power, you can resolve all of the problems with, even in a small family, you cannot do it. set aside the international community. i mean, how you can resolve everything in the 4th and question that's not possible. the united states army is good for a classic or maybe, but if the groups are there, i mean many people, lot of that in the mountains, everywhere

imagine if in the united states, russian companies had a new vice, that would allow voters in the united states to find out how russia would like them to that will be a huge scandal. you know, we all remember russian gauge was i think it was a fortune for american viewers for at least 2 and a half years until april, 2020. when basically mr. miller, mr. miller, acknowledge that there was no confusion. but we have evidence of western total support from the radical position in russia. you're just have to read the newspapers in the west, not in russian, the ah, join me every 1st on the alex simon show. when i was speaking to guess in the world, the politics sport business, i'm show business. i'll see you then me the me started my interests, i should say in black americans in the soviet union in the thirty's was finding this portrait. even though i've gone to grad school, the master's degree in russian literature, i speak russian. and i had lived over there in the late eighty's finding this portrait was, was a stunning development for me. how did i not know about this? i didn't know that this

and this kind of matchmaker between australia and the united states. and perhaps it will be easier for the front to get over this hump than it will be for the united states and australia to say china's state back to newspaper global times has described destroyer as a pool of the us and gullible, for buying into us cold war strategy, the chinese president has warned against what he calls interference from external the scene. his address to the shanghai cooperation organization. javert, general jones, we should maintain firm confidence in our systems, reject condescending, lecturing and firmly support countries and exploring development pods and governance models that are compatible with the national conditions. we must never allow any externally. interference in the domestic affairs of countries in our region, under whatever pretext, in short, we should keep the future of our country's development and progress firmly in our own hands. john blackland is an international security professor at the astronomy and national university explains how chinese mili

if the united states strikes iraq, the united states is going to have to strike the taliban. and we're going to have the, you know, declare and all our war. and from our perspective, this is how will war 3 star that you have china coming in and making deals with the taliban? you have the russia coming and making deals with taliban. they're heavily partner with, with iran. and so if the united states strikes, i re nice raise tax strike and tell me a bit me and china and russia have the all our open door to be able to strike the united states and our ward will be started. so right now we're at a standstill way to see what iran does, waiting to see what the taliban, russia and china at the same time. but, you know, today this is what we get for voted in a week leaders. a lot of people, america, they voted with bowden, with bowden, with what's best for the united states and this, the position, unfortunately, that the majority of america is put america and well, and i think everybody just looking at each other going ok what, who is going to be the next move joe. great, always to t

you back from the united states. it felt like it was left in the deep and are gonna stand. coupled with this, the realization is that perhaps america is not the part that it thought it should be under biden, after the trump era. so discuss his new development and what it means for the future. us partnership to bring in for naval entail intelligence officer, john georgia. and john, thanks for joining me on some 1st. i just want to ask you this idea that this is something that the french president thought under trumpet. you know that this is of the trump would do. did trump ever do anything like this, where you actually sold out his ally and went behind his back and sold it to another country to make money for his own country? well, i don't think this is about making money for the united states this and there are several parties to this industry is one, but no trump didn't do that old truck did. by the way the europeans were equally unhappy with him. when trump insisted that year, the europeans, including the french ge

states by requiring adult foreign nationals traveling to the united states be fully vaccinated. this is the conclusion of a policy process on that particular issue. an important one facing many people around the world. reporter: two quick questions on covid. then a follow-up question for you. now that the f.d.a. vaccine advisors have recommended boosters for people 65 and up, how soon do you expect president biden to get his booster not -- and will you do so on camera? jen: he will do so and he will do so on camera. i don't have a date for you. it's important to note just to take a slight step back there are still a couple of additional steps in the process. we view the news on friday as an important step forward in protecting more people, saving more lives. the steps now is that acip is planning to meet based on their recommendation. we are prepared to operationalize. and that includes having the president get his booster shot as well. reporter: is the president still being tested regularly for covid? jen: he was tested last week and test was negative. reporter: has he gotten o

and he asks the united states to reciprocate, but does not wait for the united states to agree. he then goes to governors island. there he is. the statue of liberty is in the background in new york harbor, with president reagan. there's reagan next to him. and president-elect george h.w. bush. george h.w. bush was elected president so he was the president-elect. if you read the minutes of these, this set of meetings, i have read them, and you read them coming from mars, you would not know that reagan hated the soviet union so much. you would not know that gorbachev hated capitalism, you would not know these two had come close to blowing up the world. you would not know that reagan had called them an evil empire. when reagan went to moscow before this, he was asked this question, he said no, that was another time. not anymore now. this visit is the moment the cold war ended. i know. because i was there. i know because i was there. i will tell you my story of this. so, i was in high school then. i was a high school student. and i used to go to styvesant high school in new york cit

it's from 1861 there 34 states in the united states. so it minus the states that succeeded this is an exclusionary flag. removing the stars have not been completed. abraham lincoln was very much against this when he became president. he wanted to emphasize the unit was still together, removing stars from the flag with legit arm and legitimate saws the confederacy. it really isn't amazing flag we have on display connected to the story of the confederate constitution and the crisis over slavery the last few things i want to bring up here, as the united states is expanding even further west there are interesting things going on in places like wyoming and utah. the franchise is expanded into wyoming for example to include women. this is a partly progressive. also partly practical. jim, i know you write about this in the book that accompanied the exhibit. they're actually very few women and wyoming at the time. they're seeking to boost population there is more and more people are moving to wyoming. anything you want to mention here with that

as francis said, you know, the united states, the u. k. and australia give friends a stab in the back and they feel a deal between france and australia and gave that to the united states and you pay . so it's a betrayal of your closest allies or partners and then they try to package it. they try to present the deal and some kind of something like a tool for peas for the asia pacific region. the whereas indeed, as you have fed already, great divide has emerged and condemn a nation, has emerged from various countries in that region. it's about money in the united states and the defense contractors as well as the united, the u. k. they're going to continue to make profit out of the business. expected to be something like $100.00 bidding us dollars over the years. let's not forget what kind of profiteering was taking place in the 20 year us war on in afghanistan, according to some latest report over the 20th, depending on budget, went up to 14 trading us dollars. and one 3rd and one half of that went to defense contractors. so it's a lot of mo

it's led to master valence in the united states. where does we know to wars and afghan scan, and iraq as well as counter terrorism operations in 85 different countries. it's militarized, a lot of things in the united states, but abroad as well. and well today is the day to remember of course. it's also a day to reflect on the ramifications of the september 11th, 2001 not only here in ground 0 but in pennsylvania, washington dc, but in the united states, and quite frankly, around the world. gabriel, thank you very much indeed. that's kevin alexander, who's talking to us from new york. well, as you saw earlier, president joe biden later, reese, 2 of those killed in chunks, fell pennsylvania of fishes joining us from their island. former president george w bush's folk in shang so suited vice president comma, la harris, george w bush. of course, the man in charge when the attacks took place. one of the themes that was common to both of them was the unity of the united states. exactly. i press the button is actually just less than the la

guest: most family units have been getting into the united states. pretty much all unaccompanied minors have been getting in and that something the biden administration has been doing since the beginning stuff it was something the trump administration had to do but earlier this year, the court gave the biden administration the choice and they declined to expel children who arrived by themselves. the biden administration has continued to expel family members. they have allowed most of them to get in so they are trying to do it in an orderly fashion. what you are seeing at the border right now is they have not been able to do that host: host:. if you are a haitian family and you are crossing with children, are you going to be allowed to stay? guest: they have been expelling people. my understanding is that they have been expelling people but i am not out there on the border right now. host: on top of these images that folks are seeing, here in washington, democrats were told by the senate parliamentarian that you cannot include immigration plans and th

kingdom and the united states. on wednesday, australia the u. k. and the us on vale orcus, it's a defense agreement aimed at countering china in the, in the pacific. bought it, cuts france out of a 2016 deal to build diesel power submarines for australia in favor of nuclear power attack from the u. k. and us it li, frank, tens of billions of dollars poorer, and it's being seen by paris as a gross deception by friends and allies. still, there are those who think parents is overreacting. i think, you know, it was not necessary. i mean, we have never recalled previously better from washington, and it's really very bad manners from the americans to, to was strong. i mean, really, i met a guy has been treating my call, i can and the dog and song, but it's only bad manners. and i think that vengeance is a meal that should be served cold after you. k or francis sped london, the sting of pulling home it's ambassador. instead french menaces have tried something more withering. they suggest it's not worth bothering with juni

this is what we want to remind the united states off. therefore, our partners decided on our initiative as well as on the initiative of germany to revise the strategic concept of the alliance. being allies does not mean being hostage to the interests of another country. there's been interesting developments in the worsening relations with france and the united states, the u. k. and australia over the new security pact will recall how boris johnson recently said that france needs to quote, get a grip. i just think it's time for some of our dearest friends around the world to pony our grip about all this. i don't wanna break because this is fundamentally a, a great step forward for global security. it's 3 very like minded allies, standing shoulder to shoulder, creating a new partnership for the sharing of, of technology. it is not exclusive, i did not trying to, to shoulder anybody. i did not at the stereo towards china now the spat between france in the united states took an interesting turn when joe biden spoke to the un general assembly

united states stands for us fans apart from many for our global leadership in private, philanthropy and welcoming immigrants and refugees into our communities. that's part of our dna. we're issuing a call to action to other companies. organizations that want to help africans starting new lives in the united states. we will help you find a way to make an impact. last night i had a chance to go out to the dulles expo center. some of you may have visited where i saw the incredible operation that we together with d h s d h s usa id are running to welcome new app can rivals when they 1st touched down in the united states. many thousands of people have fled, fear, and desperation, and now hope for a better life and future here with us. and our people made that happen earlier today had a chance to meet with our team, from embassy capital back home in the united states. i spoke with employees across the department at all hans town hall these past few weeks have been very intense. they've demanded a lot from a lot of people here at the department. people who rose to the challenge and continue to