well i think i mean i agree fundamentally with princeton i do think that. this is an indictment of a certain economic model and it's not going to change immediately think we're going to see change gradually and i mean the one problem there prison. global economy it's very difficult for countries to just go down there so i think there's going to have to be some sort of global consensus what we may see is the countries you're speaking about may have much more see the consensus is but i don't think that it necessarily is going to change thoughts about the need for accountable governments and law because that's one of the only ways you're going to be able to get for the best maybe. you're nodding your head there i mean what do you think this is an example of its kind of a strong word maybe hypocrisy again you know the west had certain rules and regulations we look at the i.m.f. we look at the world bank and then they look at these countries like china that while a nominally communist country bailed out capitalism over the last twenty one months i mean what does

well i think i mean i agree fundamentally with princeton i do think that. this is an indictment of a certain economic model and it's not going to change immediately think we're going to see change gradually and i mean the one problem in our present. we kind of mean it's very difficult for countries to just do it on their home so i think there's going to have to be some sort of global consensus what we may see is the countries you're speaking about may have much more see what the consensus is but i don't think that it necessarily is going to change thoughts about the need for accountable governments and law because that's one of the only ways you're going to be able to get the best maybe. you know you're nodding your head there i mean what do you think this is an example of my it's kind of a strong word maybe hypocrisy again you know the west had certain rules and regulations we look at the i.m.f. we look at the world bank and then they look at these countries like china that while a nominally communist country bailed out capitalism over the last twenty one

well i think i mean i agree fundamentally with princeton i do think that. this is an indictment of a certain economic model and it's not going to change immediately think we're going to see change gradually and i mean the one problem in our prison. global economy it's very difficult for countries to just do it on their own so i think there's going to have to be some sort of global consensus what we may see is the countries you're speaking about may have much more see what their global consensus is but i don't think that it necessarily is going to change thoughts about the need for accountable governance and law because that's one of the only ways you're going to be able to get forward that's maybe. you're nodding your head there do you what do you think is this an example of my it's kind of a strong word maybe hypocrisy again you know the west had certain rules and regulations we look at the i.m.f. we look at the world bank and then they look at these countries like china that while a nominally communist country bailed out capitalism over the last twenty on

well i think i mean i agree fundamentally with princeton i do think that. this is an indictment of a certain economic model and it's not going to change immediately think we're going to see change gradually and i mean the one problem with our present. kind of mean it's very difficult for countries to just go on their own so i think there's going to have to be some sort of global consensus what we may see is the countries you're speaking about may have much more see the consensus is but i don't think that it necessarily is going to change starts about the need for accountable governments. because that's one of the only ways you're going to be able to get for the best maybe. you're nodding your head there i mean do you what do you think this is an example of my it's kind of a strong word maybe hypocrisy again you know the west had certain rules and regulations we look at the i.m.f. we look at the world bank and then they look at these countries like china that while a nominally communist country bailed out capitalism over the last twenty one months i mean wha

well i think i mean i agree fundamentally with princeton i do think that. this is an indictment of a certain economic model and it's not going to change immediately think we're going to see change gradually and i mean the one problem in our prison. global economy it's very difficult for countries to just do it on their own so i think there's going to have to be some sort of global consensus what we may see is the countries you're speaking about may have much more say in what that global consensus is but i don't think that it necessarily is going to change thoughts about the need for accountable governance and law because that's one of the only ways you're going to be able to get for the best maybe. you're nodding your head there i mean what do you think this is an example of my it's kind of a strong word maybe hypocrisy again you know the west had certain rules and regulations we look at the i.m.f. we look at the world bank and then they look at these countries like china that while a nominally communist country bailed out capitalism over the last twenty on

well i think i mean i agree fundamentally with princeton i do think that. this is an indictment of a certain economic model and it's not going to change immediately think we're going to see change gradually and i mean the one problem with their present. kind of mean it's very difficult for countries to just do it on their home so i think there's going to have to be some sort of global consensus what we may see is the countries you're speaking about may have much more see the consensus is but i don't think that it necessarily is going to change thoughts about the need for accountable governments and law because that's one of the only ways you're going to be able to get the best medical care you're nodding your head there i mean what do you think this is an example of and why it's kind of a strong word maybe hypocrisy again you know the west had certain rules and regulations we look at the i.m.f. we look at the world bank and then they look at these countries like china that while a nominally communist country bailed out capitalism over the last twenty one mo

well i think i mean i agree fundamentally with princeton i do think that. this is an indictment of a certain economic model and it's not going to change immediately think we're going to see change gradually and i mean the one problem with our present. kind of mean it's very difficult for countries to just go down there so i think there's going to have to be some sort of global consensus what we may see is the countries you're speaking about may have much more see what their global consensus is but i don't think that it necessarily is going to change thoughts about the need for accountable governance and law because that's one of the only ways you're going to be able to get for the best maybe. you're nodding your head there i mean what do you think this is an example of my it's kind of a strong word maybe hypocrisy again you know the west had certain rules and regulations we look at the i.m.f. we look at the world bank and then they look at these countries like china that while a nominally communist country bailed out capitalism over the last twenty one mont

general counsel of dish network, susan from the school's law and that the visiting collaborator of princeton university. we have a partner and executive director of a coalition. travis parsons, senior director, business development. silver, president and ceo of the free press. scott, a vice president and senior fellow, and technology policy institute. and susan, the vice chair of the nielsen company. thank you all for being here. >> thank you for inviting me here today. i am the senior vice president and general deputy counsel of dish network. we want to applaud these statements. government oversight of the merger of this magnitude is absolutely essential. in a forum like this, it is important to hear all voices so the right decision is made. this is the third largest pay tv provider. we provide -- offer the most hd programming, cutting edge technology, and award-winning customer service. we will focus on how the combined comcast, nbc would impact the on-line video market. this is important to the entire video distribution industry. comcast and nbc say that this is benign in nature and will

it's great to tell you what we are doing at princeton. we are sponsoring a global warming event. it was like pulling teach to get a professor to speak in favor of global warming but we'll see. thanks a lot. >> thank you all for sticking around today. it means a lot today. >> my name is david. i am from oak state university. i want to tell you a little about my background. i grew up in one of the redest counties, canadian county. i couldn't believe in our free society that people would try to steal the election in 2002 i attended a debate. in high school, i refound our young republic can's club and later served as the vice president, president of that. i went off to clenl for the first time last august. i joined college republicans. i've always been registered a republic can and a conservative. i got to meet people running for different offices there was a guy stabling from the leadership institute we want to start a group of young republic cans of osu. one night, we all met at starbucks. the faff rite liberal chick place. three freshman there including myself and a junior. that m

matthew bonds ran away from a class on princeton avenue yesterday nephew and has not been seen system. they say he is emotionally unstable. he has run away at least six times in the last two years. in the previous incident he was found at nearby bart stations. bonds is 5'7" weighing 180 pounds. >> bay area beachgoers are being warned about sharks in the water. there have been several sightings. they have seen off the beach at capitola. here is more from lisa amin gulezian. >> the signs are you were and beachgoers are paying attention. they posted the signs after surfers reported two great shark sightings. a local diver is seen highway has seen three great whites in three weeks. >> i think the sharks cruise along the outside. normallyer seen they every other year and i've never seen them this close to the shore. >> they have been seen in this area from september to january but this time the sighting started in june. >> are you convinced this is a great write? >> no. >> he is with the atlantic shark research foundation. basking sharks are mistaken for greater whites is more likely to sw

from princeton university and from john f. kennedy school of government. all rrect? >> yes, sir. >> thank you. please go ahead. >> chairman leahy, ranking member sessions and other members of the committe thank you for the opportunity to be here today. it's a privilege to take part in these proceedings. my nye name is pete hegseth, an organization of iraq and afghanistan veterans dedicated to supporting our war fighters and their mission on the battlefield. i received my commission fom princeton univsity in 2003 and has since served two tours in the army. the first in guantanamo bay, cuba and the second in iraq with the 101st airborne division. the infantry captain with the massachusetts army national guard and a graduate student at harvard university. i'm as a citizen and a veteran and do not speak at all on behalf ofhe military, but i'm going to start with the bottom line up front as we do in the army. we're a nation at war. a nation at war with a vicious enemy on multiple fronts. i've seen this enemy first hand. as have precious few from my generation. the enemy w

stars in princeton and the. it was also a memorable. she won when you read but was beaten big spending manchester city in the final game of their pre-season tour the barclays challenge then richard setting up the candy to put the red bulls ahead. the half time city did level three zero go on the end of cross a. good chance to get going for the red bull thing going to get it in her either a good thirty yard strike from him sitting losing both games in this tournament. while the pool was won by sporting lisbon on goal difference she spoke to the side street to see robbie keane getting to the top just a minute like to speak she lives through c.-span and this is a really good diving headed to. the end maisie run from jenny valdez put the portuguese two one up. by departing a challenge you were before the intersect to put you on the front of the cat three wood forty four lies a coup finished one came forward to watch were. another news alberto contador says he is relieved to have won the tour de france the spaniard winning the race for the t

he's a professor of economics at princeton and former vice-chair of the federal reserve. subtle, counterintuitive messages don't work well in public debates, which is too bad, because the right policy for the federal budget deficit today is both subtle and counterintuitive. lets start with the easy part. the deficit is too large, just as everyone says, but what, exactly, does that mean? there are two correct answers. first, today's federal deficit is so huge-- over $1.5 trillion in the current fiscal year-- that we cant keep it up very long, but, here's the first subtlety: we can keep it up for a while. after all, the treasury is having no trouble borrowing vast sums at very low interest rates today. the second, and more important, correct answer is that the budget is on an unsustainable long-run path-- meaning that current trends cannot continue indefinitely. eventually, taxes must be raised and the spending curve must be deflected downward, not one, but both. but the second subtlety is that this is the wrong time to do either. with the economy so weak, we don't want the

we'll bring together an extraordinary panel to discuss from princeton, professor cornell west; georgetown university's sociologist michael eric dyson; two conservative columnists-- michael gerson of "the washington post" and john fund of "the wall street journal;" and abigail thernstrom, a bush appointee to the civil rights commission. afterward, i'll have some thoughts on the role the media played in all of this. but first, race in america on "face the nation." captioning sponsored by cbs "face the nation" with cbs news chief washington correspondent bob schieffer. and now from cbs news in washington, bob schieffer. >> schieffer: good morning again. a lot to talk about so we're going to get right to it. we're going to begin with the shirley sherrod case. by now, i'm sure you know the story, how a heavily edited tape that was taken totally out of context was put on the web. the result was that the administration, without checking to see what the rest of the tape said, fired the woman. then, came a lot of apologies and the offer of a new job. michael eric dyson, you are writing a book abou

princeton. cigar since the discovery of aids three decades ago it's estimated a twenty five million people have died from the disease with eva sixty million people infected in that time according to the united nations u.s. scientists identified hiv as a cause and developed a successful test to detect its presence but this has itself been a subject to scientific disagreement some believe there are different causes of aids not just hiv and cause doubt in the standard aids test which is based on detecting the presence of the hiv virus whilst you might think there are only a small number of scientists who doubt they hate hiv aids their way here at the conference is a list of around two thousand five hundred names all the scientists challenge the classic definition some to have different diseases to treatment author and his doctor tentative therapies to conventional aids fighting drugs so strong is his belief in these other treatment methods that he's written a perfect. twenty three years positive ba

to the stars in princeton and that. was also a memorable. she won when the new red bull was beaten big spending managed to city in the final game of the preseason to meet the fockers new york trannies play richard setting up from the candy to put the red bull's head. after halftime city did level through joe to go on the end of cross say. but riches to get were going for the red bull and went to get it in her eva a good thirty yard strike from him sitting losing both games in this tournament. while the pool was won by sporting lisbon on goal difference she spoke of the side street to see robbie king getting to the top would have it just a minute like to school she lives three months is spent on days there is a really good diving head it's a. i maizie run from january this put the portuguese to one up. i be putting a challenge in i for being intercepted but jonathan the three. forty allies are proof in the front page i see two i go i. know the news alberto contador says he's relieved to have won the tour de france the spaniard winning the rac

princeton a. cigar since the discovery of aids three decades ago it's estimated a twenty five million people have died from the disease with eva sixty million people infected in that time according to the united nations u.s. scientists identified hiv as the cause and developed a successful test to detect its presence but this has itself been a subject to scientific disagreements some believe there are different causes of aids not just hiv and cast doubt on the standard aids test which is based on the taking the presence of the hiv virus was you might think there are only a small number of scientists who doubt the hate i.v. aids is there a hair the conference is a list of around two thousand five hundred names all the scientists who challenge the classic definition some t. have different views as to treatment arthur and his dog t.'s alternative therapies to conventional aids fighting drugs so strong is his belief. these are the treatment methods that he's written of the twenty three years positive

consider princeton. cigar since the discovery of aids three decades ago it's estimated a twenty five million people have died from the disease they've a sixty million people infected in that time according to the united nations u.s. scientists identified hiv as the cause and developed a successful test to detect its presence but this has itself been the subject to scientific disagreement some believe there are different causes of aids not just hiv and cost out in the standard aids test which is based on detecting the presence of the hiv virus whilst you might think there are only a small number of scientists who doubt the hate hiv aids their way here at the conference is a list of around two thousand five hundred names all the scientists who challenge the classic definition some to have different views as to treatment author and his doctor to use alternative therapies to conventional aids fighting drugs so strong is his belief in these other treatment methods that he's written of the twenty three years p

considered princeton. cigar since the discovery of aids three decades ago it's estimated a twenty five million people have died from the disease with eva sixty million people infected in that time according to the united nations u.s. scientists identified hiv as the cause and developed a successful test to detect its presence but this has itself been the subject to scientific disagreement some believe there are different causes of aids not just hiv and cost out in the standard aids test which is based on detecting the presence of the hiv virus was you might think there are only a small number of scientists who doubt the hate hiv aids there way here at the conference is a list of around two thousand five hundred names all the scientists challenge the classic definition some t. have different visas to treatment author and his doctor tentative therapies to conventional aids fighting drugs so strong is his belief in these other treatment methods that he's written of the twenty three years positive based on his

was a princeton. cigar since the discovery of aids three decades ago it's estimated a twenty five million people have died from the disease they've a sixty million people infected in that time according to the united nations u.s. scientists identified hiv it's a cause and developed a successful test to detect its presence but this has itself been the subject to scientific disagreement so. i believe there are different causes of aids not just hiv and cause doubt in the standard aids test which is based on the taking the presence of the hiv virus whilst you might think there are only a small number of scientists who doubt the hate hiv aids there are a pair the conference is a list of around two thousand five hundred names all the scientists challenge the classic definition some to have different visas to treatment author and his doctor turned to therapy to conventional aids fighting drugs so strong is his belief in these other treatment methods that he's written of the twenty three years positive based

princeton. cigar since the discovery of aids three decades ago it's estimated a twenty five million people have died from the disease with eva sixty million people infected in that time according to the united nations u.s. scientists identified hiv as a cause and developed a successful test to detect its presence but this has itself been a subject to scientific disagreement some believe there are different causes of aids not just hiv and cause doubt in the standard aids test which is based on detecting the presence of the hiv virus whilst you might think there are only a small number of scientists who doubt the hate hiv aids there are a pair the conference is a list of around two thousand five hundred names all the scientists who challenge the classic definition some t. have different visas to treatment author and his doctor he's alternative therapies to conventional aids fighting drugs so strong is his belief in these other treatment methods that he's written of the twenty three years positive

considered princeton. sick or dark since the discovery of aids three decades ago it's estimated a twenty five million people have died from the disease with eva sixty million people infected in that time according to the united nations u.s. scientists identified hiv as a cause and developed a successful test to detect its presence but this has itself been a subject to scientific disagreements some believe there are different causes of aids not just hiv and cause doubt in the standard aids test which is based on the taking the presence of the hiv virus whilst you might think there are only a small number of scientists who doubt the hate hiv aids their way or the conference is a list of around two thousand five hundred names all the scientists who challenge the classic definition some t. have different visas to treatment author and his dr who tentative therapy to conventional aids fighting drugs so strong is his belief. these are the treatment methods that he's written to twenty three years positive based on

we go on toward princeton and in granada. fog comes back, plenty of sunshine tomorrow afternoon. temperatures about the same or maybe a little bit warmer and as we move into the weekend, instead of mid- and low 80s in the hot spots, we're going to go to the upper 80s. that's saturday and that's sunday. these temperatures still cooler than you would expect. minor warming for your bay area weekend. fog is a player at the coast. it's hard to get a good fog forecast because lots of small variables out along the coast will get you clearing or not clearing. your best bet for clearing at the beaches is going to be at places like steinson beach, south toward half-moon bay or pigeon point. where the winds are blowing northwest and the fog has a chance to clear. tonight the fog is going to press back in. that's 10:00, then here's the morning. fog not quite as far as into napa. fog stops at about fairfield, fog stops at about, i think it'll creep into livermore valley. but that is not as extensive a fog footprint as we have been seeing. tomorrow afternoon is back. that's your friday, can yo

. >> allan chernoff, cnn, princeton, new jersey. >> that's it for "360." larry king starts now. see you tomorrow night. >> larry: tonight, michael moore, the filmmaker, sounds off. on the fortune bp's ceo is being paid to step down and the bombshell leaks about afghanistan. he'll take your calls. and then -- >> this crime hurts families and it violates people. it is vile and it is threatening. >> larry: stalking victim erin andrews implores congress today, make stalkers pay. it happened to olympic champion shawn johnson. a mental patient armed with loaded weapons, duct tape and zip ties targeted and pursued her and she's here to say, "enough." next on "larry king live." good evening. couple of program notes. laura ingraham is here tomorrow night and tony robbins on friday. michael moore is with us tonight. the oscar winning documentary filmmaker, founder of the traverse city film festival, annual event which kicks off right now and runs through sunday. michael joins us from traverse city, his open space outdoor cinema. why a film festival in traverse city, michigan? >> why not?

princeton political scientist larry bartal studied administrations from truman to bush and he found to quote a summary of his work, quote, when a republican president is in power, people at the top of the income distribution experience much larger real income gains than those at the bottom. by contrast, he said, democratic presidents generate higher income gains for all income groups. in 2008, the "new york times" asked this question. and i think this is such a compelling comparison. imagine that starting in 1929 you had to invest exclusively under either democratic or republican administrations. how would you have failed? you make your choice in your head right now. you're probably not surprised at what the conclusion was. under republican administrations, your 10,000 dollars invested exclusively in republican administrations -- if you include the hoover administration would have net -- netted you today, $11,000 733. that's probably not fair. let's take out the hoofer administration which was argue my the -- hoover, which is arguably the worst. let's take that out in all fairness. if

it was great to talk about what we have been doing at princeton. we are scheduling a global warming event in the fall at princeton. i do not know how that will turn out. it was like pulling teeth to get a professor to speak in favor of global warming. we will see. [applause] >> thank you for sticking around today. a really means a lot for you have all -- for you all to have stayed around. my name is david griffin and i am from oklahoma state university. i want to tell you a little bit about my background before i go into what i have done. i've been a lifelong oklahoma and. i grew up in one of the rightist counties. in canadian county. -- reddest county. i have always been interested in politics. i could not believe that in our free society, people would try to steal the elections. we know what they were doing. in 2002, i intended a gubernatorial debate as a 12 year old. i do not think many people can say they have done that. in high school, i helped we found our young republicans club, which had dissipated for a couple of years. i was later able to

i got involved in the princeton prolife group. we started off the year in october with respect life week, which is a week where we have various prolife events. we started off with prolife sunday where we had wreedings in the chapel with readings from all religions and speaking events throughout the week and conclude with a candle light vigil. we have a set up of images of a fetus in different points of development. it's very important event to have. our other huge event was the march for life. we filled an entire bus

he wandered away from his home on princeton place around 1:30 yesterday. she called 911 and asked for help. about three hours later, a neighbor found the boy in a steep ravine playing in a creek. the boy's parents say their son was not hurt. nice ending. >> yes. >>> a plane crashed overseas. more than 150 people on board. there were no survivors. sweet n' sour filled twizzlers. the twist you can't resist. >>> good morning, san jose. nothing unusual this week. we've had low clouds. it does burn off around 10:00. south bay and peninsula are seeming to warm up quicker. high today in san jose, around 77. here's tori. >> thank you, steve. >>> 7:13. today in pakistan, a passenger jet crashed into the hills surrounding the capital city of islamabad, killing all 152 people on board. the u.s. embassy says two americans were among those killed. the cause of the crash is not immediately killed. but government officials say they do not suspect terrorism. the plane left from karachi and was trying to land in islamabad during cloudy and rainy weather. >>> today is the 1

it happened saturday night around 10:00 near mini drive on princeton avenue. police say a man was struck and killed by a speeding car. the car described as white with four doors and tinted windows, similar to a lexus ls-400 or a toyota avalon. witnesses also say it had oversized rims and tires. if you know anything about this, contact the police. >>> 7:53. if your child's daycare uses pesticides, chances are you may not know about it. a new uc berkeley survey finds that 90% of daycare centers in california are problems with insects such as ants, bees and spiders. but only 24% of those schools notify parents when using pesticides to get rid of the pests. the report also says that 35% of schools did not post warning signs about the treatment. >>> 7:53. tomorrow, b.a.r.t. will take up the controversial of extending b.a.r.t.'s service all the way to the oakland air. back in february, the federal government turned down a request to partially pay for the $480 million project. now the b.a.r.t. board is looking at a new funding plan which relies on money from a mix of

you got into princeton. congratulations on that. >> thank you so much. >> you also said you didn't even study so much for the s.a.t. so how did you ace it? >> you know, i don't know. i think it's more about the mentality you have. i think it's how you approach the test. there are a few things i did that really helped me in the limited studying i did. one was that i got myself motivated. i actually chose a theme song and i kind of found my anthem -- >> we actually have your theme song. it's rebellion, right? >> yes. >> what's the idea behind a theme song? >> you need something that gets you motivated. and when you're studying for the s.a.t.s, it's about concentration. so that song really helped me put in the work and put in the hours and get really in the right frame of mind for tackling the test. >> cat, one of the things you say is good for tackling this task of trying to get really good scores on the s.a.t., chewing gum. >> right. well we suggest that students chew their favorite flavor of gum. because fir

he is a lecturer at princeton university. to his left, geographically, -- >> it is going to be a tough audience. >> michael is another triple threat. resident fellow at the american enterprise institute and analyst at fox news. principal author of -- directly to my right is a democratic member of california since 1992. >> i need this. >> one of the leading figures among house democrats on issues of intelligence and national security. we don't have the empty chair where michael steele was scheduled to be a until he canceled yesterday. we will try to soldier on without him. overviewrt with the question that everybody is wondering at this point. what are the prospects today that republicans will capture the house or the senate or both? >> when you look at a few important numbers -- the more people are telling us today than a month ago that the direction of the country is on the wrong track. the president's job rating has been going down. if you look at his job rating in the 50 house seats democrats have won, these are not solid

princeton political scientist larry bartal studied administrations from truman to bush and he found to quote a summary of his work, quote, when a republican president is in power, people at the top of the income distribution experience much larger real income gains than those at the bottom. by contrast, he said, democratic presidents generate higher income gains for all income groups. in 2008, the "new york times" asked this question. and i think this is such a compelling comparison. imagine that starting in 1929 you had to invest exclusively under either democratic or republican administrations. how would you have failed? you make your choice in your head right now. you're probably not surprised at what the conclusion was. under republican administrations, your 10,000 dollars invested exclusively in republican administrations -- if you include the hoover administration would have net -- netted you today, $11,000 733. that's probably not fair. let's take out the hoofer administration which was argue my the -- hoover, which is arguably the worst. let's take that out in all fairness. if

as a student, she excelled at princeton, oxford, and harvard law school. she was a law clerk to the great supreme court justice justice thurgood marshall. and i appreciate seeing justice marshall's son in the audience here today. she worked in private practice and briefly for then senator biden on this committee. she taught law at him go of the greatest law schools. she served as dean of harvard law school and is now the solicitor general of the united states, sometimes referred to as the tent justice. i believe we are better country for the path of excellent elena kagan has taken. her career as a path not open to both men and women. as chief justice marshall wrote, our constitution is intended to endure for ages, and consequently, to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs. he and other great justices have recognizes that the guarantees and the powers granted in the constitution adapt to changing circumstances. consequently, our constitution has withstood the test of time. the genius of our founders was to establish a constitution firm enough to

a princeton political scientist studied income growth from the administrations from harry truman to george w. bush, and he found that "when a republican president is in power, people at the top income distribution experience much larger real income gains than those at the bottom. by contrast, democratic presidents generate higher income gains for all income groups." and 2008, "the new york times" asked this question, i think this is such a compelling comparison -- imagine that starting in 1929, you had to invest exclusively under either democratic or republican administrations. how would you have a fair? -- have fared? you make the choice in your head right now. you are probably not surprised by what the conclusion was. under republican administrations, your $10,000 invested exclusively in republican administrations, include a herbert hoover administration, would have netted year to date set -- $11,733 -- would have netted you today $11,733. let's take out the herbert hoover administration. that was the worst. if you are charitable and take that out, to $10,000 investment exclusively under

bernard lewis, who was at princeton university, pushed the prior administration and brzezinski to support the islamic movement against the soviet union. the idea that, you know, we could help them or backed them with a religious fundamentalism school, which the british pushed heavily, creating hundreds of billions of dollars and a slush fund with the british-saudi deal for weapons for oil -- host: let's get a response from our guest. guest: i'm not quite sure i follow your question there. there is an opium trade in afghanistan. it is one way farmers make money. they get into a situation where they are in debt to the drug dealers and the only way they can pay that back is by growing opium. if they grow wheat, they do not make enough money to it back to be helped by subsidizing the price of wheat. the other part of your question refers to the 1980's when the united states funneled money for weapons for pakistan into mujahedin forces in afghanistan who were fighting the soviet military that invaded iraq is as of 1979 and were in there for 10 years -- that invaded right around christmas of 19

host: our guest has taught at a number of american universities including harvard and princeton. he is a former minister of trade for the iraqi governing council. our next call for ali allawi is from indianapolis. caller: good morning, sir. i guess my question to you is everybody over there thinks the i reinstate the jewish people of israel, but i do not believe that at all. i think it is a possibility that the iranians as soon as they get the bomb will use it on you. guest: i suppose you mean iraq. i personally do not believe this should be the case. whether iran is armed and on which nuclear bombs is not really determine its policy vis- a-vis iraq. we have deep groups with a number of political leaders and a number of political parties. iran has an extensive network of influence in iraq. whether it is strange and further by the development of an atomic bomb does not really see -- is normally change the situation in iraq. there are large number of political allegiances that of their power to iraq. we need to be clear that the independence of the company requires independence and

. , a professor of cornell and a professor of princeton university. on "state of the union," they discuss national security with the former cia director. then the focus turned to race in america with the dean of uc- berkeley law school, and the contributing editor to "the new republic." the program wraps up with a discussion on president obama and the business community with mort zuckerman. five sunday television talk shows begin airing at noon eastern with nbc's meet the press, at 1:00, "this week," 3:00 p.m.,"face the nation." listen to them on c-span radio on 90.1 and on sirius channel 132 or anywhere online at c-span radio.org. >> this weekend, former new york times editor on the changing world of the newspaper industry. >> i worry about some of the standards and maintaining integrity as we move from one to another.d >> tonight on c-span's today. >> the sec wants to establish an emergency communication in a work -- the fcc wants to establish an emergency communication network. association for public service -- discuss the proposal monday night on

he is teaching a course at princeton, the naacp gave him an image award and he is a keynote speaker. you have to wonde if the guy who says that green jobs are the colonel of destruction of the capitalist system, completely embraced by the democratic party promoting green job legislation next week, doesn't that mean the democratic party is trying to destroy the capitalist system? isn't that what that means? [applause] harry reid is telling everyone he has removed cap-antrade from the energy bill. does anyone here believe harry reid? do we trust harry reid when he says things like that? does he deserve any benefit of the doubt? this is what is going on now with energy. harry reid has temporarily taken a cap-and-trade provisions out of this bill to get it through the senate and into a conference committee where henry waxman has already promised to put cap-and-trade back in so that they can force it through in a lame duck section after the election. john kerry said they are going to do the same thing. it is not a big secret. they just think we are not paying attention, but we are. even i

princeton political scientist larry bartal studied administrations from truman to bush and he found to quote a summary of his work, quote, when a republican president is in power, people at the top of the income distribution experience much larger real income gains than those at the bottom. by contrast, he said, democratic presidents generate higher income gains for all income groups. in 2008, the "new york times" asked this question. and i think this is such a compelling comparison. imagine that starting in 1929 you had to invest exclusively under either democratic or republican administrations. how would you have failed? you make your choice in your head right now. you're probably not surprised at what the conclusion was. under republican administrations, your 10,000 dollars invested exclusively in republican administrations -- if you include the hoover administration would have net -- netted you today, $11,000 733. that's probably not fair. let's take out the hoofer administration which was argue my the -- hoover, which is arguably the worst. let's take that out in all fairness. if

a princeton political scientist growth andhe eco administrations from harry truman to george w. bush and he found "when a republican president is in power, people at the top of the income distribution experience much larger real income gains than those at the bottom. by contrast, democratic presidents and generate higher income gains for all income groups." in 2008, "the new york times" asked this question -- i think it is a compelling comparison --"imagine that starting in 1929, you had to invest exclusively under a democratic or republican administrations. how would you have fared?" you make your choice in your head right now. you are not surprised at the conclusion. under republican and ministrations, your $10,000 invested exclusively in republican administrations, if you include the hoover administration, would have netted you $11,733. but that's probably not fair. so let's take out the hoover administration, which was arguably the worst. let's take this out in all fairness. if we are charitable and take that out, then you're $10,000 investment exclusively during the course

princeton political scientist larry bartell studied income growth from truman to george w. bush. he found that when a republican president is in power, people at the top of the income distribution experience much larger real income gains than those at the bottom. by contrast, democratic presidents generate higher income gains for all income groups. in 2008, "the new york times" asked this question. this is a compelling comparison. imagine that starting in 1929, you had to invest exclusively under either democratic or republican administrations. how would you have fair? you make your choice in your head right now. -- how would have dared fare predict fa -- inred would you have fared? >> $10,000 invested in republican administrations would have netted you today $11.737. that is probably not fair. let's take out the hoover administration. that is arguably the worst. let's take that out in fairness. if we're charitable and take that out, your $10,000 invested exclusively during republican administrations over the last 70 years would have resulted in51 $,211 -- would have resulted in