states and vice versa there of united states is concerned if we had open free unshredded elections do you think radical islamic movements would come to power instantly across the greater middle east. i'm not radical i think many of the mainstream political islamist movements would come to power in the early elections but over time if your hypothetical scenario were to take place i think over time. most slums within the broader muslim world will have the opportunity to engage in a debate that is largely denied to them right now about the type of society that they want to live in what form of religion how much religion they want in their government. and so i think you know one has to understand the question of democracy as a long term historical process there is this myth that somehow democracy can be achieved in a fortnight. and so there's concern that you have these elections and then you have these you know liberal groups that come to power but i think that's perfectly understandable and reasonable if one has a sense of history in terms of how democracy developed i mean in the united

states and vice versa there will be united states courts and if we had open free unshredded elections do you think radical islamic movements would come to power instantly across the greater middle east. i'm not radical i think many of the mainstream political islamist movements would come to power in the early elections but over time if your hypothetical scenario were to take place i think over time. muslims within the broader muslim world will have the opportunity to engage in a debate that is largely denied to them right now about the type of society that they want to live in what form of religion how much religion they want in their government. and so i think you know one has to understand the question of democracy as a long term historical process there is this myth that somehow democracy can be achieved in a fortnight. and so there's this concern that you have these elections and then you have these you know liberal groups that come to power but i think that's perfectly understandable and reasonable if one has a sense of history in terms of how democracy developed i mean in the u

how about the united states? has anybody supervised or inspected the nuclear arsenal here in the united states? remember that the i.a.e.a. statute says that when it speaks of disarmament, everyone must disarm. secondly everyone must enjoy peaceful nuclear energy and third that proliferation must be stopped. now, what has the i.a.e.a. done in terms of disarmament? nothing? >> rose: so? >> ( translated ): the countries that have veto power have, in the meantime, done nothing, too, about it. it's quite natural. it's politicized from the very foundation of it. and now they don't like us and what we represent and they feel that the nuclear issues is one excuse to put pressure on us. but they're wrong and the time for that has passed. >> rose: okay, fair enough. who do you mean by the "zionist regime"? >> ( translated ): a regime that has occupied palestine and now forces its rule on that territory. >> rose: but why don't you just say aisrael? why don't you say the state of israel rather than the signist regime? >> ( t

talking about using the word immigrants is not the case at all in the united states the united states citizens are upset that our borders are not secure and i don't think that's unrealistic for any country any nation for the citizens of that nation to want their borders to be secure because our borders have not been secure for so many years back since reagan gave the first amnesty back you know twenty years ago and even after nine eleven in new york city almost what less than a decade ago we still do not have secure borders and where we've got you know people yes we've got a majority of people crossing our border from our southern border but we've got people crossing from our north to and i'm sure both of your guests wouldn't disagree with me but you know we also have recently though and i did an interview on this al-shabaab coming through texas which is you know other terrorist organizations that are coming through our southern border i mean these are the things that the american people are very concerned about when you guest just mentioned the children from the tell you the italian

states and if it escalates against the united states you can be sure the u.s. will counter escalate not called and she delays struggles to a strategy of regime tehran will and when you run well that's and that's the question of you and i personally think that aaron would blink but i think the only place you can we do things and we do i mean i ask you you're mean are you saying that it has doesn't have the right of self-defense so you very childish interpretation of you know you know we have this peter and gloria you know in a way i want to show you i mean it is barbaric to go down the great thing about being in a university is that you get to study history and learn from it and in fact we have two presidents for this in one thousand nine hundred one israel did military air strikes against iraq's almost open ocean iraq a nuclear reactor in two thousand and seven israel did air strikes against syria's reactor under construction both reactor is very well just so you might imagine the reaction really really right no make a wrong you know we get why she didn't reall

states with all of its assets. >> rose: does that offer opportunities for the united states and russia to cooperate in ways that it has not before? >> i think it does. and not only for the united states and russia but also for europe because the competition which we now witness in the world, it's an objective fact, you know. the desire to sell more goods, services, high tech products, intellectual products is measurable and the powerhouse of the world is moving to asia and the pacific. this is recognized by all available statistical data. but it's also civilization. the competition enters into the value. the values promoted by the western civilization are not accepted without question by others the asian civilization, latin civilization, african civilization. so we've had some common denominator in the form of the universal declaration of human rights. basic rights have been formulated. but as soon as you start going into the details, deciphering each and every principle which has been universally endorsed, you get into some interesting discussions. and i wanted to explain in that arti

he went to the congress of the united states. he said to the congress, we need to have a ban on -- a ban or -- a moratorium on drilling off the cost of -- coast of california. this deliberative body held hearings, i assume, i haven't delved into that, but i do know the congress and the president issued a moratorium on drilling off the coast of california and to my knowledge, that moratorium is still in place. . if there was anybody drilling at the time, they probably felt like their contract rights were stepped on and the court ruled on it and must have ruled in favor of the congress and the president because the moratorium is still in place. what does that tell us about the right way to declare a moratorium? the right way is to go to congress. and with the congress, put forth the congress declaring a moratorium and the president enforcing that moratorium. that's the way it's supposed to operate if you read this little book, the constitution of the united states. that's what it says. that's not what we get. the president of the u

i relived that the united states seriously contemplates. conducting a military strike against iran because the consequences will be disastrous indispensable whether iran has those. missile or anti air. three hundred almost and secondly russia has made it very clear that indispensable of reposts mong with the united states and indispensable of this decision to. purchase nevertheless. overall partnership affiliations with. russia to get decisions to start or. plant quite recently showing that corporative relations with iran persistent will develop food that russia does not limit in any way political dialogue with iran and the meetings and you know summits go on and so on and so forth russia does not subscribe to the united states to create an illusion of your own an isolation from the international system so on and so forth so the approach is really balanced and . the real distribution of. all right thank you very much for your insight that was a dimitri simes from the think tank the council on foreign and defense policy in russia. and now so

that means after the election and after a new united states senate is elected, after united states house of representatives is elected. then the people that no longer represent the will of the american people come back here after november and come here to do the essential business of the united states of america but they don't have the support any longer of the voters who have chosen some different people. but the two pieces of legislation i'm talking about that were attached to the d.o.d. authorization bill are the don't ask, don't tell policy, which is something that was implemented under president clinton back in the era when he wanted to put gays in the military, found that he ran into a political buzz saw and settled for a compromise that turns out in retrospect, and i didn't support it at the time, madam speaker, to be straight about that, but in retrospect, it was a pretty good policy. essentially it was, we have people with different inclinations and those that come to serve america can do so without announcing their sexual preferences and as long as they keep that to themselves

narrator: over 300 million people live in the united states. and each person uses an average of 100 gallons of water every day. man: what it takes to actually make clean water is somewhat a mystery to most customers. woman: so how does water get from the river into your house, or here at school? woman: somebody has to bring that water to us, and somebody has to take it away when we're finished with it. man: the water infrastructure is vital for disease protection, fire protection, basic sanitation, economic development, and for our quality of life. man: you just can't visualize all the assets that are under our feet. we have about two million miles of pipe in this nation. if you're walking around in an urban area, you're probably stepping on a pipe. man: our grandparents paid for, and put in for the first time, these large distribution systems. woman: and in many cases, it's not been touched since. man: we're at a critical turning point. much of that infrastructure is wearing out. narrator: our water infrastructure is made up of complex, underg

states look at egypt i mean egypt is very friendly country to the united states friendly government but it's a. gamble but it's a dictatorship that's as if it was authoritarian system dictated and the united states has struggled and is struggling now i think with you know how do we cooperate with the egyptian government on things like arab israeli peace and regional stability while also somehow you know promoting those within egypt to you know who want to bring about democratic change ok so it's a dilemma for the united states how to do both of these things because it is not realistic it's not just going to. go ahead in denver go ahead yeah i mean i think the united states knows perfectly well that those forces within egypt that are democratic if they come to power they will adopt policies that will clash with longstanding us in true. in the region for example if there is a free and fair election in egypt most likely the muslim brotherhood would come to power and the first thing that they would do is open that border with gaza and try and rescue the people who are in cage there the

states look at egypt i mean egypt is very friendly country to the united states friendly government but it's a. gamble but it's a dictatorship that's as it dictators authoritarian system dictate and the united states has struggled and is struggling now i think with you know how do we cooperate with the egyptian government on things like arab israeli peace and regional stability while also somehow you know promoting those within egypt who you know who want to bring about democratic change ok so it's a dilemma for the united states how to do both of these things because it's not realistic and so i'm just going to. go ahead and denver go ahead yeah i mean i think the united states knows perfectly well that those forces within egypt that are democratic if they come to power they will adopt policies that will clash with longstanding us in true. in the region for example if there is a free and fair election in egypt most likely the muslim brotherhood would come to power and the first thing that they would do is open that border with gaza and try and rescue the people who are in cage there

how about the united states? has anybody supervised or inspected the nuclear arsenal here in the united states? remember that the i.a.e.a. statute says that when it speaks of disarmament, everyone must disarm. secondly everyone must enjoy peaceful nuclear energy and third that proliferation must be stopped. now, what has the i.a.e.a. done in terms of disarmament? nothing? >> rose: so? >> ( translated ): the countries that have veto power have, in the meantime, done nothing,oo, about it. it's quite natural. it's politicized from the very foundation of it. and now they don't like us and what we represent and they feel that the nuclear issues is one excuse to put pressure on us. but they're wrong and the time for that has passed. >> rose: okay, fair enough. who do you mean by the "zionist regime"? >> ( translated ): a regime that has occupied palestine and now forces its rule on that territory. >> rose: but why don't you just say aisrael? why don't you say the state of israel rather than the signist regime? >> ( tra

states look at egypt i mean egypt is very friendly country to the united states friendly government but it's a. goal but it's a dictatorship that's as it dictators authoritarian system dictate and the united states has struggled and is struggling now i think with you know how do we cooperate with the egyptian government on things like arab israeli peace and regional stability while also somehow you know promoting those within egypt who you know who want to bring about democratic change ok so it's a dilemma for the united states how to do both of these things because they're not realistic and so i'm just going to. go ahead and denver go ahead yeah i mean i think the united states knows perfectly well that those forces within egypt that are democratic if they come to power they will adopt policies that will clash with longstanding you. interests in the region for example if there is a free and fair election in egypt most likely the muslim brotherhood would come to power and the first thing that they would do is open that border with gaza and try and rescue the people who are in cage t

states and if it escalates against the united states you can be sure the u.s. will counter escalate not called and she lays struggles to a strategy of regime tehran well andrea you run well that's and that's the question of you and i personally think that tara ron would blink but i think clinton is going to do things only because i mean i ask you you say you are so mean are you are you saying that it has doesn't have the right of self-defense so you very childish interpretation of you know you know we have this peter and gloria you know in a way i want to show you i mean it is barbaric to go down the great thing about being in a university is that you get to study history and learn from it and in fact we have two precedents for this in one thousand nine hundred one israel did military air strikes against iraq's almost open ocean iraq a nuclear reactor in two thousand and seven israel did air strikes against syria's reactor under construction both reactor ok we'll just show you right now the reaction really really right no don't make a wrong you know we'll see w

>> in the united states. by the press in the united states. but i thought it was a very successful visit. and, in fact, at the end of the visit, there was a very lengthy joint declaration that was made as to what the two countries needs toe do together. they were all very positive and i certainly take hard by that particular visit there was one point that was made by both presidents that the two countries need to improve strategic trust between the two of us, between two countries. and i think it's a very, very... >> rose: what's the problem in terms of the strategic trust. >> i think, as i said earlier, you know, there are people in america who thinks china is a threat to united states. they're people in china who thinks america never wished china well in the first place. and these are real issues. and is it real? how can we overcome these problems? we need to overcome some of these problems and in the case of the first instance, it's america's view china is a threat now china has no wish to challenge the united states of america. there's no

much of this is about the united states. now, defense ministries all over the world prepare for bad outcomes, worst-case scenarios, etcetera. so i sort of come back to the point that the historical definition of threat, or at least we're taught in the military where i came from, is a combination of capability and intent. and so it's that intent side of the equation that is now uncertain that i think we can shape and work on and prevent this from being a relationship that heads toward uh, conflict. but there's no question in my mind that on the capability side of the equation, there's very robust, uh, investment, and much of it is oriented against the united states. >> you've had a good deal of military experience. i know there have been numerous efforts over decades, really, to engage in military to military cooperative exercises and discussions and so on. it doesn't seem as though much of that has succeeded. why? >> well, we've talked about the mutual suspicions and the overall relationship. that's at it's height, highest p

states or come from long lines of families that come from the united states. we know we see this difference along the spectrum. let me highlight a couple of points that i think make a big difference. realize we have a cohort population between 8 million and 11.5 million of individuals in the united states who are undocumented, who some say are illegal or not lawfully present. they are in a group that is cut off in part and formality from the main economy. this is unwise because immigrants, both skilled and unskilled, in this case, that 8 million to 11 million, provide the innovative engine in the economy in these relatively dark times. i'll address the issue of unemployment. but in these difficult economic times, they provide a certain component to the economy which allows us to innovate and grow at a rate that we otherwise would not. in short, immigrants of all types unaverage are net contributors to the economy, help the actual pie grow bigger, provide more of a pie to split among us all and in turn try to goose innovation in a couple of unanticipated ways.

a new super bug threat growing in the united states. it's origin, and the states that are getting hit. hello, everyone. i'm richard lui in for chris jansing at nbc headquarters. we have two breaking stories i want to share with you first. take you to tennessee where an explosion there at a plant that makes flairs for the military. that is toone in tennessee. it's about 75 miles due east of memphis, if you're familiar with that area. this is in the southwest part of the state. it's unclear, according to the latest information that we've got in terms of how many people have been hurt. we have been listening to local affiliate. it's reporting multiple ambulances and helicopters were sent to the scene. we hope to get the pictures for you very soon. stay with us. we'll monitor that and get you the latest information. we're also watching this breaking story from amsterdam. we go to where a u.s. pilot was arrested as -- an intoxicated american pilot is what we're talking about is he was preparing to take off with a passenger jet there. the pil

using the word immigrants is not the case at all in the united states the united states citizens are upset that our borders are not secure and i don't think that's unrealistic for any country any nation for the citizens of that nation to want their borders to be secure because our borders have not been secure for so many years back since reagan gave the first amnesty back you know twenty years ago and even after nine eleven in new york city almost what less than a decade ago we still do not have secure borders and where we've got you know people yes we've got a majority of people crossing our border from our southern border but we've got people crossing from our north to and i'm sure both of your guests wouldn't disagree with me but you know we also have recently and i did an interview on this al-shabaab coming through texas which is you know other terrorist organizations that are coming through our southern border i mean these are the things that the american people are very concerned about when you guest just mentioned the children from the tell you the italian immigrants that were

states and debt ratios are also close to what the united states is in the u.k. they say so and then in terms of how or how you're a pair the situation no we are not particularly optimistic and beyond really politicians ease i mean again i mentioned i mean what william actually said is you should probably let a lot of those banks fail i mean many of the wall streets being they're on drily bangs out because senos they just put a visit money and if they if they get it wrong they get by the taxpayer if they get it right they just take it out as a bonus quickly enough so that when later on so are things done so are they there to get the taxpayer money again so that was the big problem but now really i don't really see an easy fix was a solution even from the federal reserve can print more money of a have more power it's not going to work because i learned greenspan even alan greenspan even recommended homeowners before the borrower came on to take all of these. mortgages the federal reserve made it much much worse so i'd best they're very incompetent or worse they're

states and the debt ratios are also close to what the united states is in the u.k. they say so and then in terms of how or how you are pad the situation no we are not particularly optimistic and beyond really politicians ees i mean again i mentioned i mean no one really actually said is he should have probably let a lot of those banks fail i mean many of the wall street's bangs that andrea bangs at the scene as they just did a visit money and if they if they get it wrong they get bad by the taxpayer if they get it right they just take it out as a bonus quickly enough so that when later on so are things done so are they there to get the taxpayer money again so that was the big problem but now really i don't really see an easy fix was a solution even from the federal reserve if you bring more money of a have more power it's not going to work because ireland greenspan even alan greenspan even recommended home on us before the barber came on to take all of these. mortgages the federal reserve made it much much worse so i'd best they're very incompetent or worse they act

states and as we know that they they intend to ratify the treaty at the same time with the united states and we have a comment. here for you. this time of the year a certification process in the states concerts internal elections can be one sort of the servant is to be reelected which means the minute senators consider the situation not in terms of where the agreement is good or bad for the united states but in terms of what you may contribute to their own electoral could be a little bit because the document itself is too much important for the national interests of the united states for the national interests of russia for the globalization of interest to be mixed up in a single. election can be. you know there is a huge support on russia's part for this treaty and we heard it this was mentioned by by russia's defense minister. yesterday when he met with secretary of defense robert gates and they they discussed once again they reaffirmed areas of cooperation between russia and the united states and they also they were talking about they signed in a statement a joint statement on setting

>> larry: you're not saying the united states committed genocide, you're saying the united states committed genocide? >> translator: that's a separate discussion and, yes, it did happen in both iraq and afghanistan. but that's a separate issue. i like to ask you, if in a country someone's rights are violated, they're oppressed, assuming your assumption, your statement is correct, does that imply that they can go and occupy another land? is there any logic in that if we were to follow that logic, will there be in security left in the world? in world war ii, if they were to occupy 20 countries around the world that would be terrible. >> larry: israel is a legal state. >> translator: the question is -- come on. the question -- you just said yourself it's over the holocaust. why are you changing your statement? >> larry: you were saying -- >> translator: my question is what are the interests of the united states to -- absolutely defending them. there are many parts of the world where human rights are violated. you know how many american indians were killed? do you know or not? >> larry: i know.

states and coming into contact with the united states so consequently my puerto rican friends, and some of my irish friends, although they were more circumspect, what are you doing writing about the irish? i'm writing about the united states. the irish are more interesting. they had to put up with colonialism, just as puerto rico is a colony of the united states. i also respect the fact that they have a facility with language, which i also enjoy. consequently, i wondered why this attraction to the irish. in 2004, the university of puerto rico asked me to come there and lecture and read. i immediately called my favorite cousin, and she said, what are you doing here? i told her and i said, please come to the reading, i have a book for you. she came. she said my son is getting married tomorrow at the caribbean hilton, could you please come? and i went. i hadn't seen her in 30 years. we were kids together. and after the wedding, there was a reception and she introduced me to her daughters, very beautiful girls, then i met the last one, very beautiful, green eyes, and she said, i want you it

unfortunately in the united states, we don't hear that narrative as ready. americans have to search out what's going on in palestine, and it takes a lot of work, and the internet is really helping that to quite an e on in palest, among them is that we found something we think is going to work, and that's peaceful, non-violent resistance. we want to make our voice heard. >> the other thing that we don't hear a great deal about, is the dialogue that's taking place within israel itself. we tend to believe that the government of the moment speaks for the israeli people. it is my understanding that the dialogue over the middle east that takes place in the united states is much more restricted than the dialogue that takes place within israel itself. is that true? >> that is true. there's a much more open, honest discourse within israel. unfortunately, the progressive, peace-minded political community in israel is still in retreat. public opinion polls there show that the majority realize that occupation of the west bank is wrong, that it mortgages israel's future

states since all three of the you are in the united states. i think that the most important thing that everyone needs to recognize is that the debate in the united states is not without precedent there have been many episodes in american history where we've gone through the exact same debate if you look around the world there are countries from australia to europe that are undergoing similar debates immigration today in immigration historically has always been about the movement of people from poor countries to rich countries the threat that is perceived in rich countries is a threat primarily to the way of life we enjoy much better living standards in rich countries than in poor countries and the concern whether we're talking about the united states or we're talking about western europe is the concern that as more immigrants flow into the country there's a threat to the economic way of life. and you're saying they have borne what you're saying that you're saying that's a myth. no i'm saying that this is the this is all very true but we have t

states since all three of the you are in the united states. i think that the most important thing that everyone needs to recognize is that the debate in the united states is not without precedent there have been many episodes in american history where we've gone through the exact same debate if you look around the world there are countries from australia to europe that are undergoing similar debates immigration today and immigration historically has always been about the movement of people from poor countries to rich countries the threat that is perceived in rich countries is a threat primarily to the way of life we enjoy much better living standards in rich countries than in poor countries and the concern whether we're talking about the united states or we're talking about western europe is the concern that as more immigrants flow into the country there's a threat to the economic way of life. and you're saying they have borne what you're saying that you're saying that's a myth. no i'm saying that this is the this is all very true but we have

states and debt ratios are also close to what the united states is in the u.k. they say so and then in terms of how or how you are pair the situation. we are not particularly optimistic and beyond really politicians easy i mean again i mentioned i mean what william actually said is he should have probably let a lot of those banks fail i mean many of the wall street's bangs and really bangs our casinos they just play business money and if they if they get it wrong they get bad art by the taxpayer if they get it right they just take it out as a bonus quickly enough so that when later on so are things done so are they there to get the taxpayer money again so that was the big problem but now really i don't really see an easy fix was a solution even from the federal reserve bring more money of a have more power it's not going to work because i learned greenspan even alan greenspan even recommended home on us before the barber came on to take all of these. mortgages the federal reserve made it much much worse so i'd best they're very incompetent or worse they're actua

it was not fundamental to the united states constitution. if we let supreme court justices, i think we will all be better off. >> i would not have voted for justice sotomayor or kagan. i would not put anyone in a lifetime position that did not prove themselves with either caseload or president, and i would not have a litmus test because the constitution does not prove they have a litmus test, other than the advice and consent of congress. now, the president can nominate anyone that he or she wants when the case may be. it is up for the senate to decide. the president can nominate anyone of these. and my time is up, and i have to leave it at that. thank you. >> at a minimum, are justices should understand the law and more importantly have a track record of a poll -- upholding the law. there was a mistake in a supreme court nominee. that is a mistake for life. and so, we have got to make sure the bay of a track record that we can measure. there are many candidates that do, and if i were on the supreme court right now, i would of only voted to

god bless the united states of america. [applause] ["stars and stripes forever" playing] th [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2010] ♪ . . . flu >> in a sense, you represent the vows and issues of all black people in front of president bush preer preer-how do you represent the issues to president obama? >> the short of it. i always start with this, everything is a part of the black agenda. when someone comes to me and says what is the black agenda? they already told me. everything is. at the end of the day, it will disproportion natalie help our community. it doesn't talk about bringing down crack versus powder cocaine bringing down 101 to 1. we are always going to the president saying how do we fix it for everyone, not just black folk. >> it doesn't matter how good your education is if you don't have a place to live. you seen what has happened in our xhounity. tomb times kids are only getting potato chips. >> that might be the only meet that kid gets

. >> as mexico seeks to shut down the flow of drugs moving north, the united states needs to step up to the plate and shut down the flow of weapons and cache moving >> ifill: plus, jose luis sierra of new america media reports on how the drug war has affected the tourism and manufacturing industries in the mexican state of baja california. >> we want to get back to getting people to think about mexico as fun in the sun and margaritaville and those types of things and stop associating mexico with blood and violence. >> brown: global post's suzanna koster reports from pakistan on an islamic charity providing aid to flood victims in the absence of government help. >> ifill: and margaret warner speaks to veteran journalist earl caldwell about famed civil rights era photographer and newly revealed fbi informant ernest withers. >> ifill: that's all ahead on tonight's "newshour." major funding for the pbs newshour has been provided by: >> feels like. >> from deep space. >> to a microbe. >> i can contribute to the world by pursuing my passion for science. >> it really is the key to the futur

states and if it escalates against united states you can be sure the u.s. will counter escalate not called and she lays it is struggles to a strategy of regime tehran well and when you run well that's and that's the question of you and i personally think the terror around would blink but i think the only place you can we do things and we do i mean i ask you you are. are you are you saying that it has doesn't have the right of self-defense so you very childish interpretation of you know you know we have this peter and gloria you know when you might want to use barbaric to go down the great thing about being in a university is that you get to study history and learn from it and in fact we have two precedents for this in one thousand nine hundred one israel did military air strikes against iraq's almost open ocean iraq a nuclear reactor in two thousand and seven israel did air strikes against syria's reactor under construction both reactor ok well just so you might react if you really really right know don't make a wrong you know we do it why should you really

states and if it escalates against united states you can be sure the u.s. will counter escalate not called and she lays struggles to a strategy of regime tehran will and when you run well that's and that's the question of you and i personally think that aaron would blink but i think you know let me tell you can we do things only what i mean i ask you you are so mean are you saying that it has doesn't have the right of self-defense so you very childish interpretation of you know you know we have this peter and gloria you know when you might want to be going it is barbaric to go down the great thing about being in a university is that you get to study history and learn from it and in fact we have two presidents for this in one thousand nine hundred one israel did military airstrikes against iraq's almost open osa iraq a nuclear reactor in two thousand and seven israel did air strikes against syria's reactor under construction both reactor ok we'll just show you right to react if you really really right know don't make a wrong you know we'll see what it was sh

so i think there's got to be a huge reset on the part mostly of the united states to accommodate. in. its own behavior to accommodate the new course extraordinary presence of china in the great mix of countries and politics of the world. i mean in looking at china and the. there is the sense that the chinese do remember history they remember their own history very well. emerging it's reemerging if i get the chinese narrative correct ok and that also involves its neighborhood ok the relationship between let's say the nine china. and what was the soviet union of going back to the russian empire was not always very good with the chinese would see with certainly historically that the russians were part of the carving up of china and its influence in the humiliation of china and i think that that reemergence is to a race that but you know russia feels very much the same you think when you look at russia and i'm not asking you to be a russia expert but you know emerging on the international stage do you see it similarities between russia and china you know matching on the internationali