however, i could find it a modest non-conformance. the fact that the objectionable part is in the rear, in terms of what may have been a handy man or owner-initiated construction. that it has been removed, i find a acceptable, and that leads to my decision to support the legalization of this addition as a legal non- conforming use. my suggestion to the owners is i think they may have a more difficult time going through phase 2. vice president goh: this is a hard one. this is a hard one. i hear commissioner fung. i hear your comments, yet i do think we have evidence in front of us indicating that the better part of the illegal addition was done in the '90s, and we heard from the neighbor who has been there 10 years, so it is even possibly more recently than that. then we looked at the 1990 sanborn map which mr. kornfield suggested as part of a device for doing the research, and mr. sanchez showed us a line of where the existing building is, which is far away from a little pop out that the map shows. i mean, it does seem like there is a

addition as a legal non- conforming use. my suggestion to the owners is i think they may have a more difficult time going through phase 2. vice president goh: this is a hard one. this is a hard one. i hear commissioner fung. i hear your comments, yet i do think we have evidence in front of us indicating that the better part of the illegal addition was done in the '90s, and we heard from the neighbor who has been there 10 years, so it is even possibly more recently than that. then we looked at the 1990 sanborn map which mr. kornfield suggested as part of a device for doing the research, and mr. sanchez showed us a line of where the existing building is, which is far away from a little pop out that the map shows. i mean, it does seem like there is a great family here, and a family that would participate in the community and act as good neighbors. they would be my neighbor, several blocks away. but i am having trouble with it. on the other hand, as mr. vested rights. we heard it conforms to planning codes prior to 1978. i canno

the legalization of this addition as a legal non- conforming use. my suggestion to the owners is i think they may have a more difficult time going through phase 2. vice president goh: this is a hard one. this is a hard one. i hear commissioner fung. i hear your comments, yet i do think we have evidence in front of us indicating that the better part of the illegal addition was done in the '90s, and we heard from the neighbor who has been there 10 years, so it is even possibly more recently than that. then we looked at the 1990 sanborn map which mr. kornfield suggested as part of a device for doing the research, and mr. sanchez showed us a line of where the existing building is, which is far away from a little pop out that the map shows. i mean, it does seem like there is a great family here, and a family that would participate in the community and act as good neighbors. they would be my neighbor, several blocks away. but i am having trouble with it. on the other hand, as mr. vested rights. we heard it conforms to planning codes prior to 1978. i canno

it can be non-conforming, but it cannot be legal. commissioner fung: if we are saying that we believe this was constructed predating the change in the planning code, whether it had a permit or not, we are now finding -- now doing findings that it has become a legal non- conforming -- the non-conforming portion only relates to the more recent code change, the more restrictive code change. president peterson: will the findings need to be if it were more of a vested right basis? madam city attorney? >> i believe what the planning department has said is that you need to make a finding that this is legal non-complying to get a variance to proceed with this work. commissioner garcia: we do not need to find that a permit existed? vested would seem to me it is based upon a legal permit having been issued. >> i would defer to planning and building department as to whether legal non-complying require some evidence of a permit having been in existence. >> scott cinches, planning department. the fact is that it is a legal non-complying structure

but there is a boundary that identifies agricultural certified and non-certified. supervisor maxwell: thank you. ms. brown? yes, another question. have you looked at the boundary lately, has it changed -- >> if i may. i think we have relatively simple solution. in our next some middle for application, that we provide a seasonal boundaries so that we have a winter season and summer season boundary. that would give us the flexibility to assign certain spaces for non-certified uses when we know we are going to have those vacancies, so we can be in compliance. we can work with the agricultural commissioner. i think there is a solution we can work to worward. supervisor maxwell: ok, thank you. i would like to continue this. i want to ask our real estate department -- i want to have day a check-in -- hopefully, they have a number of items that they would like to have completed or are working to complete by december 31. i would ask that maybe the meeting before, if they could come back in and check in with us to let us know where you are. we will have a talk. i will meet

non-violet. we would like a non-violence peace process. >> if i report that you are looking for a non-binary revolution, will that take you put back under house arrest -- non-violet revolution, will that put you back under house arrest? >> i do not use the word revolution has used -- as you are using the board. >> they might put you back in prison? >> no, i am not scared. they might do it again. my attitude is i will do what i can while i am free. if i am arrested again, i will do what i can. >> mobile phones have really taken off everywhere what did you think -- everywhere. what did you think when you saw one? >> i had never handled one before. it was very inadequate. it was small. i was keeping it near my mouth and your mind years and shifting it around. >> today, opposite the building where we did the interview, the security was out in force, and identifying everyone who came and went. only the secret police were allowed to use these from a year, to follow dissidents are around. with aung san

on non-violent revolution. let's put it that way. it great change means our revolution, whether a violent or non-violent. we would like in non-alignment, peaceful revolution. >> if i were to report what you said, that you were looking for a non-a violent revolution, would that get you back under house arrest? >> i am not sure how they would interpret the word "revolution." i do not know how you are using the word "revolution." for me, it means radical change. >> are you afraid they might impose imprisonment on you? >> no, i am not scared. i know there is that possibility. they have done it in the past. they might do it again. i am committed to do as much as i can while i am free. if i am arrested, i will do as much as i can while i am arrested. >> well you have been in prison, what did you think when you first saw mobile phones? >> i never saw one before. it seems very inadequate to me. they are so small. there is no mouthpiece. i did not know whether to keep it near my mouth or near might years. everyone kept showing me. "golan. --

all you non-indians, just look around. this is what custer saw at the little bighorn, and you know what he said to his men? where did all these indians come from? once again, welcome to the sixth annual nida american heritage month celebration here at city hall. -- annual native american heritage month cicelebration. i would like to thank our host for this month, native american aids project, the mayor's office, the san francisco native american health center, and kqed public broadcasting. how about a big round of applause for our host? thank you. at this time, when indian people -- when we gather, we throw on our regalia, our outfits. we do not call them costumes. if you are from oklahoma, we call them in being close -- clothes. it is good to see all these dancers and singers as well, their families. when we gather like this, we start out with prayer, so please stand if you are able. creator, grandfather, we give thanks this day for the many blessings for this beautiful day, this opportunity to honor our own here in san f

we do not have non-certified markets, if you will. that is not an experience we have, here in san francisco. supervisor maxwell: so all of our markets are certified? >> yes, supervisor. supervisor maxwell: anything else you would like to add? most people never knew we had one. most people do not necessarily know what you do or how important you are to us. that is why i kind of wanted to get some more information. >> there are 58 counties in california. each county is required by law to have an agriculture commission, weights and measures. some counties share a commissioner between the two. we all essentially do the same job, we have the same jurisdiction. we have a california agriculture commissioner and cedars association where we work together to apply consistently uniformly all bylaws and regulations from the agricultural code of regulations and the businesses regulation code. in almost every county, in each county, the ccommissioner is assigned to look at the device. supervisor maxwell: parking meters? >> yes. the scales that you

>> that is correct. >> did you make any distinction between non-union and union workers, or are they all lumped together? >> for this particular data, they are all lumped together. we did not have a good reference point or a source to make a distinction between how many could be union and how many could be non-union. >> the union folks -- did you approach and they did not have the information? >> the study did not include a survey of the building. now we are going to shift to a subset of san francisco resident workers, and these are active apprentices. now there are five trains that are most common among the carpenters. reserve five trains that are most common among carpenters. the apprentices are almost evenly divided among the major ethnic groups in san

so it is up to this board to decide if it is a legal non- complying structure. president peterson: mr. sanchez, you said it was code compliant, it appears? >> i believe if it was constructed prior to 1978 it would have met the planning department code requirements for eight rear yard at that time. -- for a rear yard at that time. commissioner fung: refresh my memory of the exact dimension that is non-conforming. >> it looks like it is the rear 10 feet. commissioner garcia: what? >> 10 by 25. commissioner fung: we would have allowed a pop out, right? >> that is correct, but only at one level. i will check the bernal codes. they are much more restrictive and may not permit the pop out. this would not comply with the 12 foot pop out. commissioner fung: about 10 feet, you are saying. >> correct. it would have complied in 1970. president peterson: is there any public comment on this item? members of the public? step forward. while we are waiting for the first speaker, i want to put on the record that we did check to make sure that vice president goh's home is outside

of non potable water. this was later transition to ground water. the park was an early leader in what reduce through the use of secondary water from the mcqueen plant. recycled water represents the future of park sustainability and will keep the park green even during drought conditions. this will be our ability to supply water for irrigation. our project began in 1996. many sites have been considered for a recycled water facility. the project has undergone many changes in scope. this is including the bathhouse and boathouse and the oceanside plant. engineering studies between 2006-2008, this was developed for facilities in this location. in late 2008, failure to provide a higher level of treatment as well as recommendations for the facility closer to the end-users but the project to focus on another location. this systematic provides an overview of the project. this would be at the west end of golden gate park. the facility would produce and deliver an average of 2 million gallons per day of the water. th

>> the amendment is non- substantive amendment. it is primarily in the language of the appendix d, and basically the language distinguishes the difference between the documentation needed, and it also lists the documentation needed to demonstrate the grant award. >> we would entertain a motion that includes that amendment? it has been moved and seconded it is unanimous. >> we are on item number 10, which is the boat house request for proposal.

>> that is correct. >> did you make any distinction between non-union and union workers, or are they all lumped together? >> for this particular data, they are all lumped together. we did not have a good reference point or a source to make a distinction between how many could be union and how many could be non-union. >> the union folks -- did you approach and they did not have the information? >> the study did not include a survey of the building. now we are going to shift to a subset of san francisco resident workers, and these are active apprentices. now there are five trains that are most common among the carpenters. reserve five trains that are most common among carpenters. the apprentices are almost evenly divided among the major ethnic groups in san francisco, and women are better represented, comprising about 10% of this population. due to the large number of older look to see how many local residents were entering apprenticeship programs, even though we understand this is just a slice of the new entrants. this charts as the history of san francisco resident apprentice in take

this appears to be an exception to a generalized, non-gender based requirement. couples, male and female and unmarried fathers are subjected to five years. only unmarried mothers get the largess of one year. why shouldn't everybody just be put into the broader category rather than extending the largess to a greater number of people? >> the reason, just smare is we are not talking about an exception. that was the standard prior to the 1940 resolution. congress imposed new residence requirements because it was concerned about the foreign influence in mixed marriages, meaning someone married to an alien. in those cases, congress said in the record that they were concerned when those children were born abroad, that they would be more foreign than american. >> doesn't the five-year residency requirement address that? if we apply it generally, wouldn't it hong kong's concern about there being a substantial tie to the states? >> it absolutely would. but that concern is not applicable when you are talking about two u.s. citizen parents to whom the extended residence requ

so in here, i just spray it with a little non-stick. i cut each cinnamon roll into three pieces, so now we're going to make cini-minis and these only take four minutes. remember, it's redi set, four minutes to go! o.k., now over here, i've got some little smokies sizzling in there, i'm gonna make some pigs in a blanket, my grandkids love these and while i do this, if you could go back to the refrigerator and bring me a pan you'll find in there. >> o.k. >> i've just got some pancake mix and i'm gonna pour it right over those little smokie links, and these are gonna make great finger food. i find that little kids really would rather eat with their fingers. o.k., and those'll bake in about four minutes. >> all right. >> you know what i did? at night before i go to bed, i take a frozen tater tot, drop it into each well and then pour some egg over it and put it in the refrigerator. then all i have to do is get up, pop it into the redi set go and i'll have "eggsters" or potatoes in eggs in four minutes. redi, set, go, o.k., now, how about som