security council has heavily criticized nato bill calling far beyond the u.n. resolution many are deeply alarmed by the growing number of civilian casualties and by the way on the hague prosecutor's decision to go off to war criminals and leave you russia actually supports it but as russia same voice as we've learned said what about needle strikes that kill civilians who's going to be punished for that many analysts believe that any ground involvement will lead to escalation of the conflict or to more violence on the ground but with these recent. elements coalition forces could be looking for ways to go around the u.n. resolution that does not allow the environment of foreign troops on the ground and some say maybe those international criminal court warrants will provide that loophole for more on the coalition forces on how the coalition forces are trying to break the stalemate there is my colleague daniel bushnell. a real bombardments of libya's reached did in according to nato libya's leader colonel gadhafi has dug in defensive positions meanwhile civilian ca

you know if it doesn't make sense not a good idea for you to be in the security council the u.n. security council is meant to contain only those foreign powers in the world that matter and so when you say your members go. well that's actually that's quite correct in terms of foreign policy power is still very much a member state level but there is france there is the u.k. and we've seen the libyan crisis that's you hasn't been very relevant at all ok i mean how does this proposal if it was to happen going to be welcomed by france and britain because they may risk losing their particular individual seats on security council therefore i guess along with it their political clout now going to go down really well but on the same for them is it. no probably than the not going to be very pleased but you have to take into account this is just sort of a resolution by the european parliament without any direct effect it just shows how basically out of touch many people in the european core and or with the real world well if it does happen if if the big if the trying to involve itself in in

security council that there is strong evidence that peaceful protesters was shot during government demonstrations in february well for more details let's now cross live to our she's going to church courage and joining us live in our washington studio. how was the prosecutor's report received by the u.n. . well carol the u.s. welcomed the international criminal court prosecutors plans to request three arrest warrants for alleged criminal crimes alleged crimes against humanity committed in libya since february fifteenth they hate prosecutor did not specify who these three people are pretty stone that the international criminal court has been investigating colonel gadhafi some of his sons and aides over what the prosecutor called a predetermined plan to attack protesters he said now is the time to start planning on how to implement those possible rest warrants and that's the interesting part carrying out those arrests will require foreign forces on the ground to actually do that the issue of him forcing any future accord or it is expected to be discussed

security council. resolution reports the move has been met with condemnation from some it was believed that the only step to follow. there's been a horrified response around the world and here in brussels the idea of giving the european union a permanent seat on the un security council would allow the e.u. . the world security decisions both britain and france here this is the first step we were stripped of their permanent place on the council one british m.p. here says this britain sovereignty and they will fight the move many of the countries are more for example or. less worthy of a voice and five hundred million. seats as well as france and britain and also influence from many parts of the world notably africa and latin america in the security council composition is already boy. this move was proposed by a member of the european parliament from spain one of the biggest euro states without a permanent seat. in the foreign policy and i guess there's no you know in the european union in politics all.

security council is expected to receive a much more a position. he wants more authority for itself on an international level but opposition voices think the powers of the unions are only bodies already too great expenses too large forty tackles your skepticism and then he later this hour. we have to look at the expenses of the european parliament itself and there is a very good example a very simple example of why the european parliament should have two seats one in brussels and the other one in strasbourg it costs additional almost three hundred million euros per year if you have to move once in a six week from brussels to strasburg so let's have only one seat and we can give and we can show by perfect example to the people of europe that we are able to save the taxpayers money. recent controversial court decisions in georgia the country's legal system under the spotlight the acquittal rate of less than one percent and he accused the government of tightening its judges as a country which over reports social status in georgia sometimes enough to a

security council is expected to receive much more opposition. well he wants more wroth already for itself on an international level but opposition voices think the powers of the unions ruling bodies are already too great an expense is too large tackles and within n.e.p. in the next hour. we have to look at the expenses of the european parliament itself and there is so you one very good example a very simple example why the european parliament should have two seats one in brussels and the other one instructor it costs additional almost three hundred million euros per year if you have to move once in a six week from brussels so let's have only one seat and we can give and we can show by perfect example to the people of europe that we are able to save the taxpayers money. recent controversial court decisions in georgia the country's legal system under the spotlight with the acquittal rate of less than one percent so many governments of tightening its grip over judges as yet there are going to chew over reports initial status and sometimes an after

security council with some seeing it as a threat to their sovereignty. for the big bear that says al qaeda sends a steady stream of agents to russia and says they're often found among militants killed in anti terror operations. the european cause decision to find a georgia. trial exposes a role with the country's if not trump legal system but many south of the world make much difference on the current leadership. very warm welcome to you this is a line from moscow the crackdown on anti-government protests in syria is intensifying with army tanks reportedly shelling residential districts in the third largest city of homs where human rights groups believe more than that seven hundred fifty people have been killed since the rest began almost two months ago and with the crackdown international pressure of the country to stop the violence is a little so growing following the recently introduced e.u. sanctions the u.s. is reportedly considering calling for regime change in stasis more emmet reports parallels with the libyan scenario which started with similar

sensitive u.n. security council. reports the move has been met with condemnation from some members of the union the and it's a step too far. there's been a horrified response around the world and here in brussels so the idea of giving the european union a permanent seat on the un security council it would allow the e.u. to look at the world security decisions both britain and france here this is the first step was stripped of their permanent place on the council one british. britain sovereignty and they will fight the move many other countries for example are india's billion plus people less worthy of a voice than the e.u.'s five hundred million giving the e.u. seats as well as france and britain also to the wounds from many parts of the world notably africa and latin america who were on the security council's composition is already poised to. this move was proposed by a member of the european parliament from spain one of the biggest. states. claims the current financial difficulties corporation in foreign policy the

security council is expected to receive much more a position. they want some more authority for itself at international level but opposition voices think the powers of the unions would imply this already too great expense is too large. your skepticism. here to look at the expense of the european parliament itself and there is one very . very simple example why the european parliament should have two seats one in brussels and the other will instruct work in. costs additional almost three hundred million of your olds per year if you have to move once in a six week from brussels to strasburg so let's have only one seat and we can give and we can show a perfect example to the people of europe that we are able to save the taxpayers money. recent controversial court decisions in georgia have brought the country's legal system under the spotlight with the acquittal rate of less than one percent many accuse the government of tightening its grip over judges as it has been approach over reports social status in georgia is sometimes enough to avoid punishm

security council. reports the move has been met with condemnation from some members who believe that a lot of mean it's a step too far. there's been a horrified response around the world and here in brussels the idea of giving the european union a permanent seat on the un security council would allow the e.u. to unlock the world security decisions both britain and france have this is the first step to were stripped of their permanent place on the council one british m.p. here says this will raise britain's sovereignty and they will fight the move many other countries are the one for example or india's billion plus people less worthy of a voice and five hundred million people in the e.u. seats as well as france and britain also. from many parts of the world notably africa and latin america who are on the security council composition is already poised to move in with this move was proposed by a member of the european parliament from spain one of the biggest your if they with the permanent seats will rema

security council meeting safety zones in the country or incorporating with the u.n. security council in distribution of humanitarian aid throughout the country to those who need it all c t b. the vote now presented by the african union as well as letting international observers in libya to monitor how those resolutions are being fulfilled of course libyan leaders in response to that have stopped and they are willing to do so but under their conditions i believe they can now listen to what for mr barak had to say on that. number was frozen motion from tripoli is willing to consider approaches based on the african union road map for peace. over there ready to fully meet the requirements of the un resolution only. used but said it was necessary for the opposition to make similar moves you know for nato to stop bombing relationship. over from foreign minister sergei lavrov has once again stressed that nato is actions in libya go beyond resolutions of the un security council and the only solution to the crisis is a non military one another condition that so we did authori

security council's resolutions to create safety zones in the country to cordray to get the u.n. security council one distribution of humanitarian aid throughout the country to follow the road map presented by the african union and to let international observers inside the country that would be monitoring how those resolutions are fulfilled however in their turn living in the thirty's has conditions under which they willing to do so. people got to use tripoli is willing to consider approaches based on the african union road map for peace they are ready to fully meet the requirements of the un resolution only but said it was necessary for the opposition to make similar moves and for nato to stop bombing turning israel love ruth once again stressed that nato is actions in libya to be younger as aleutians of the u.n. security council and that there is no military solution to this all day and even though russia is not a mediator in this particular conflict it does agree with the roadmap presented by the african union opposition members are also to come to moscow to hold talks with fo

security council resolution one see them juggling with words trying to make what doing. feets with the terms of the resolution but of course it's transparently not possible to do that and of course as in the case of intervention in the civil war that is illegal under international law and the un resolution to that effect wouldn't make it legal but in fact that that resolution doesn't cater for intervention in a civil war we've now seen the rebels saying that they're disappointed in the amount of help that nato has offered what do you make of that well i said i imagine that they probably don't have experience of dealing with nato or dealing with foreign governments and their their intentions and intervention and so on i'm sure that they were hoping that military intervention would mean that they would very rapidly meet their military goals which of course has to come to power in their country and establish democracy in whatever their goals are i'm sure they must've felt that it was a much simpler matter and will be very disappointed to know that not only have their own si

security council voted to take action against libya it was designed as they said to protect civilians and now it seems that with the escalation of the air attacks they are hitting as it seems more and more civil targets we've heard from a u.n. agency expressing the super security council that civilians are suffering in a number of ways shortages of food and so on as a result of the airstrikes this again raises the question of international law it's not legal to intervene within civil wars and i think inviting. those leaders to washington for talks shows that obama is disregarding that aspect of international rule it's trampling upon the very legal structure that our states have built up over decades it is a regime change war that's absolutely apparent that of course again it's illegal under international law but they will do that. and frankly it does look as though now that they may intend to talk getting executed after. so that on this hour here on our t.v. russia those who fought in the world war two victory day celebrations commemorating the saudi triumph over nazi germany are marr

security council as part of an overhaul plan of the common defense security and foreign policy but a move has caused the scorn of some member states the u.k. has already said that it will not give up its permanent seat on the council for the sake of a single european city charles taylor explains sites to expand its new ones and friends. there's no way that the british government or the british conservatively geisha and i speak for the conservatives in the european power that we would support any move which weakened our ability to project our foreign policy interests and clearly being founding members of the un security council with a veto as a permanent member this is a major plank in being able to project our foreign policy interests and indeed we were so successful recently in collaboration with our french colleagues in securing u.n. security council resolution nineteen seventy three over libya so no we would not give up our seat in favor of the needy you see because at the end of the day the common foreign security policy of the european union is only when we all agree and sometim

security council while giving the blog more control of world security issues or some mental states for evil also threaten their independence. also georgians have to turn to the international human rights court to get justice for american method by high ranking officials exposing the parents flaw in countries much to do the legal system. as well next start he talks to a member of the european parliament and says a growing e-mail for christie is leading to an inability to solve pressing problems on the continent. yeah. he heads the euro skeptic e.c. all brought fighting to take control back from brussels just as often do you believe the e.u. secretly taking new powers without telling people. yes exactly idea to build up call on the consulate of corporate tax base and all these things of course for the first loop it might look innocent but if you go down what is behind that it might be a one instrument in the future might lead to a further harm addition of tax base which is something we very hard about those i can see sort of risk you coming to that you want particular risk it probably is

security council critics say the union has enough problems to song without getting more involved in incidents like this some. progress on a lousy government process in syria intensifies and say this is not something to stop bloodshed but many see sanctions on a project that calls for a theme that changes echoes of the insurrection in the libyan. president instead of says al qaida is continuing to send a steady stream of agents to brussels no clear consensus as i also found among members since killed announce a terror operation the russian leader also instructed the risk of a problem in the knowledge that is beneficial to me since i'm getting sick. next to a member of the european parliament who says a growing e.u. bureaucracy is needing to an inability just so pressing for blooms on the concert. yes n.e.p. heads the. fighting to take control back from brussels it was designed to do you believe the e.u. secretly taking new powers without telling people. exactly idea to. consolidate its corporate tax base and all these things of course for the first look. if you go deep behind that it might be

security council critics though say the union has enough problems to solve without getting more involved in international issues. a crackdown on anti-government protests in syria intensifies and so does international pressure comes to stop the bloodshed but many see sanctions unpredicted calls for regime changes echoes of the intervention of the living conflict. and president. continuing to send a steady stream of agents to russia's north caucuses as they're all from the condom on militants killed in ninety ten of the operations the russian leader also stressed that terrorism is a shared problem. is beneficial to russian security. next he talks to a member of the european parliament who says a growing. is leading to an inability to solve pressing problems on the continent itself. yeah m.e.p. heads the. block fighting to take control back from brussels just as often do you believe the e.u. secretly taking new powers without telling people. exactly idea to build our. corporate tax base and all these things of course for the first. but if you go behind that it might be a one instrument in t

security council resolution has been absolutely they've gone far far beyond the terms of the u.n. security council resolution one seen them juggling with words trying to make what they're doing. fits with the terms of the resolution but of course it's transparently not possible to do that and of course as in the case of intervention in the civil war that is illegal under international law and the un resolution to that effect wouldn't make it legal but in fact that that resolution doesn't cater for intervention in a civil war we've now seen the rebels saying that they're disappointed in the amount of help that nato has offered them what do you make of that well i said i imagine that they probably don't have experience of dealing with nato were dealing with foreign governments and their their intentions intervention and so on i'm sure that they were hoping that military intervention would mean that they would very rapidly meet their military goals which of course is to come to power in their country and establish democracy in whatever their goals are i'm sure they must've felt that

security council resolution one seen them juggling with words trying to make what they're doing. in fits with the terms of the resolution but of course it's transparently not possible to do that and of course as in the case of intervention in the civil war that is illegal under international law and the un resolution to that effect wouldn't make it legal but in fact that that resolution doesn't cater for intervention in a civil war and we've now seen the rebels saying that they're disappointed in the amount of help that nato has offered them and what do you make of that. well i suppose i imagine that they probably don't have experience of dealing with nato or dealing with foreign governments and their their intentions intervention and so on i'm sure that they were hoping that military intervention would mean that they would very rapidly meet their military goals which of course is to come to power in their country an established democracy and whatever their goals are i'm sure they must've felt that it was a much simpler matter and will be very disappointed to know that not only h

security council is expected to receive much more a position. with the e.u. wants a moral authority for itself on a level position of power is. already great and expensive large. and with an adult in about twenty minutes. we have to look at the expense of parliament itself and there is a very. very simple example why the european parliament should have two seats one in brought so. and the other will instruct work it costs additional almost three hundred million euros per year if you have to move once in a six week from brussels to strasburg so let's have only one c. and we give and we can show my perfect example to the people of europe that we are able to save the taxpayers money. recent controversial court i think is in georgia have the country's legal system under the spotlight with the acquittal rate of less than one percent many iggy's the governments of tightening its grip over tartars but is it true over reports social status and daughter sometimes and nothing to avoid punishment. a high profile murder and a low profile investigation the case of sandra

security council should adopt a new resolution on libya was a little nine hundred seventy three there's not invisible man operations we need a new resolution. and forces planned that all along says a leading u.s. law professor early what we're seeing unfold here in libya is a pre existing war player by nato by the british by the french by the americans who care move here everything now is going according to plan which is why i believe that since they have failed to our polls could our fee with these steps are so far the next stage will be moving into a ground invasion nato powers have jukes the international community into supporting the war and that's one author protecting civilians was the claim that grabbing the country's resources is the real goal this is one of the most the. reason transgressions of the rights of nation national sovereignty and international law we've seen in the post world war two period the west the u.s. and france and britain have been called berkeley according to the evidence that's leaking out covertly arming the opposition to gadhafi in hopes of grabbing the

security council should adopt a new resolution on libya was illusion one thousand seven hundred three there's not invisalign operations we need a new resolution. and forces plan that all along says a leading us law professor clearly what we're seeing unfold in libya is a pre existing war play out by nato by the british by the french by the americans with air moving everything now is going according to plan which is why i believe since they have failed to our polls could our fee which is steps are sol thought are the next stage will be moving into a ground invasion and the powers have to push the international community into supporting war knows what all of that protecting civilians was the claim but grabbing the country's resources is the real goal of this and one of the most the. reason transgressions of the rights of a nation national sovereignty and international law that we've seen in the post world war two period the west the u.s. france and britain have been called berkeley according to the evidence that's leaking out covertly arming the opposition to gadhafi in hopes of grabbin

security council sanctions or. strong measures against syria so i think they learned from their deadly mistake on the libya case when they abstain that this thing has no when and if it's allowed to pass. libya and nato air strike has hit colonel gadhafi compound in tripoli a quarter of a killing one of his sons it's not the first time the alliance has made parents attempt to leave his knife and early this week russia's prime minister has the coalition to stop reaching the u.n. resolution. the theme to ensure the coalition said destroying get their feet was not by goal. his palaces now some officials have claimed eliminating him was in fact their goal gave them that right did he have a fair trial returning to the no fly zone the bombings are destroying the country's entire infrastructure when the so-called civilized world uses all its military power against a small country destroying what's been created by generations i don't know if that's good. websites we're asking for your opinion why has intervention happened i

security council should adopt a new resolution and libya resolution one thousand seven hundred three does not invisible man operations we need a new resolution western forces plonk that's all along says a leading us law professor clearly what we're seeing are unfold here in libya is a pre existing war play out by nato by the british by the french by the americans who would tear everything now is going according to plan which is why i believe that since they have failed to our polls could our fee which is steps are so far the next stage will be moving into a ground invasion powers of jukes the international community into supporting the war and those one all of them protecting civilians was the claim but grabbing the country's resources is the real goal this is one of the most the worries and transgressions of rights of nation national sovereignty and international law the we've seen in the post-war period the west the u.s. and france and britain have been called virtually according to the evidence that's leaking out covertly arming the opposition to gadhafi in hopes of grabbing contr

security council sanction for. strong measures against syria so i think they learned from their deadly mistake on the on the libya case when the strain that this thing has you know when we if it's allowed to pass. well maybe a nato airstrike has hit it off his compound in tripoli but also the killing of his sons is the first time the advances made an apparent attempt to the libyan leader's life earlier this week russia's prime minister the coalition to stop breaching the u.n. resolution. does begin to injure the coalition so destroying good daffy was not they goal then why bomb his palaces now some officials have claimed that eliminating him was in fact their goal who gave them that right did he have a fair trial returning to the no fly zone the bombings are destroying the country's entire infrastructure when the so-called civilized world uses all its military power against a small country destroying what's being created by generations i don't know if that's good. website or asking for your opinion why hasn't event

security council critics of the initiative both say that the e.u. really speaks with one voice and has got enough problems at home to solve without this bushel reports from brussels. there's been a furious reaction across the world and in brussels itself what brights as the european union have to lecture the world on war issues when it can't come to any agreements back at home and it can't sort out its own problems in the e.u. say experts there was no unity over the invasion of libya among e.u. member states we're currently seeing royals in greece over the government's handling of the country there are several states that want to help rescue fellow members they portugal's filled economy there's also the question do you you taxpayers want to bailouts and pay for this extra cost at the time of financial crisis the move would leave the. member states with three out of the six permanent positions on the council now several large parts of the world from asia to africa and latin america have no voice whatsoever and they already accuse the west of being ov

security council resolution one seen them juggling with words trying to make what they're doing. in fits with the terms of the resolution but of course it's transparently not possible to do that and of course as in the case of intervention in the civil war that is illegal under international law and the un resolution to that effect wouldn't make it legal but in fact that that resolution doesn't cater for intervention in a civil war and we've now seen the rebels saying that they're disappointed in the amount of help that nato has offered what do you make of that. well i suppose i imagine that they probably don't have experience of dealing with nato were dealing with foreign governments and their their intentions intervention and so on i'm sure that they were hoping that military intervention would mean that they would very rapidly meet their military goals which of course is to come to power in their country and establish democracy in whatever their goals are i'm sure they must've felt that it was a much simpler matter and will be very disappointed to know that not only have their

security council critics on the vienna shit say that the e.u. has enough problems at home to solve without that so let's get the details now from donald partial muscles for us. all the european parliament voted in favor of this me so what's the reaction been. with reactions behind go there was passed with a three hundred ninety nine vote majority of good britain and france. sorry daniel do you carry on we have a few technical issues that are better to carry on. yes saying the britain and france have permanent seats on the un security council but they still think voice of power on the security council and the navy is there's no unity between the european states so there's a question mark how they're going to come to a common decision greece as we're seeing is facing protests over its inability to deal with its financial crisis of course the european union there was no unity over the invasion of libya and of course there's no agreement on how to deal with the portuguese economy which is on the verge of bankruptcy so there's a question mark first o

security council should adopt a new resolution and libya resolution one thousand seven hundred three there's not invisible man operations we need a new resolution. and forces plan bets all along says a leading u.s. law professor clearly what we're seeing unfold here in libya is a pre existing war player by nato by the british by the french by the americans who would tear libya everything now is going according to play and which is why i believe since they have failed to our polls khadafi with the steps are solved far the next stage will be moving into a ground invasion and later powers of jupiter the international community into supporting the war and that's one of them protecting civilians was the claim but driving the country's resources is the real goal this is one of the most the. reason transgressions of the rights of a nation national sovereignty and international law that we've seen in the post-war period the west the u.s. and france and britain have been called virtually according to the evidence that's leaking out covertly arming the opposition to gadhafi in hopes of grabbin

security council resolution one seen them juggling with words trying to make what they're doing. fit the terms of the resolution but of course it's transparently not possible to do that and of course as in the case of intervention in the civil war that is illegal under international law and the un resolution to that effect wouldn't make it legal but in fact that that resolution doesn't cater for intervention in a civil war and we've now seen the rebels saying that they're disappointed in the amount of help that nato has offered what do you make of bats. well i suppose i imagine that they probably don't have experience of dealing with nature were dealing with foreign governments and their their intentions intervention and so on i'm sure that they were hoping that military intervention would mean that they would very rapidly meet their military goals which of course is to come to power in their country and stop its democracy in whatever their goals are i'm sure they must've felt that it was a much simpler matter and will be very disappointed to know that not only have their own sid

security council in the long haul say of well security issues the move could damage the strength of some member states independence. georgians have to turn to the international human rights court to get justice for a murder mystery by high ranking officials exposing an inherent flaw in the country's much trumpeted legal system. but next talks to a member of the european parliament says a growing role crissy is leading to an inability to solve pressing problems on the continent. he heads the e.c. all brought fighting to take control back from brussels just as often do you believe the e.u. secretly taking new powers without telling people. yes exactly they say idea to build up they call on consolidated corporate tax base and all these things of course for the first loop it might look innocent but if you go deep down what is behind that it might be a one instrument in the future might lead to further harm addition of tax base which is something we very hard approach i can see certain risky points in that one particular risk point is. hidden measures that might lead to further harmonize atio

security council we will discuss trying to understand what was planned because that integrations from the money that we are seeing now are enough to learn lessons with international opposition on the rois states face an uphill task to make the case for more war britain's prime minister will dealt sending ground troops to libya his defense secretary a bit it's a part of what they plan exactly that but you have members good at the number of civilian deaths from nato bombing a drone likely to welcome this collation of the conflict that it was your london. twenty minutes you can catch an interview with a british member of parliament one of the few voted against taking action and he sees the air offensive quickly heading to the ground as a preview. if you like of the resolution because it does talk about. protecting civilians and using measures to implement policy. to try. and control some control. and i think we have got to be very careful. you've got to make sure you've got moral high ground you've got to make sure that the measure. has been exhausted and i'm not sure. as well so i think

security council sanction for. strong measures against syria so i think we learned from their deadly mistake on the on the libya case when the strain that the state has no when it's allowed to pass. libya a nato air strike has hit a colonel gadhafi compound in tripoli personally killing one of his sons and three of his grandchildren so the first time the alliance has made an apparent attempt by libyan leaders knife this week russian's prime minister coalition to stop reaching a u.n. resolution. does begin to insure the coalition said just drawing good their feet was not my goal and why bomb his palaces now some officials have claimed that eliminating him was in fact their goal who gave them that right to the have a fair trial returning to the no fly zone the bombings are destroying a country's entire infrastructure when the so-called civilized world uses all its military power against a small country destroying what's being created by generations i don't know if that's good. well website where asking for your opini

security council should adopt a new resolution on libya was aleutian one hundred seventy three there's not invisible line operations we need a new resolution was done forces planned that all along says a leading us law professor clearly what we're seeing unfold here in libya is a pre existing war ploy by nato by the british by the french by the americans with their movie everything now is going up or in the play and which is why i believe since they have failed to our polls darkie what steps are solved far the next stage will be moving into a ground invasion and the powers have to push the international community into supporting the war and that's one author protecting civilians was the claim that grabbing the country's resources is the real goal this is one of the most the. reason transgressions of the rights of nation national sovereignty and international law that we've seen in the post-war period the west the u.s. france and britain have been called work early according to the evidence that's leaking out covertly arming the opposition to gadhafi in hopes of grabbing control of the

security council resolution, 1929. to maximize the pressure on the iranian regime to engage seriously in diplomacy on the nuclear issue, something we have not seen to date. earlier today we announced a series of significant new measures with regard to sanctions against iran including seven new entities, companies designated under sisada as well as 16 new entities or individuals designated under the so-called in cna s. i think those are significant steps forward and we're continuing to look at other steps that we can take to demonstrate our seriousness and beyond our seriousness, the seriousness of the international community on these issues. it's instructive that the european union yesterday also announced about 100 new companies or firms that they're sanctioning in continuation of the international effort against iran. we have a strong platform in which to build over the course of last year. i think an unprecedented set of sanctions based on u.n. sanctions after. what you had, what we did nationally and what other par

security council we will discuss trying to understand what was planned because that integration is from the money and we're seeing now are enough to learn lessons with international opposition on the rois states face an uphill task to make the case for more war britain's prime minister will dealt sending ground troops to libya his defense secretary of muted to parliament they planned exactly that but you have members good at the number of civilian deaths from nato bombing a drawing likely to welcome escalation of the conflict there what you're see london . pressure is mounting on the russian parliament to introduce chemical castration for paedophiles that say the current laws allow criminals to reaffirm something which is force desperate parents to hand down their own form of justice some believing strong forms of punishment alone won't solve such a complex and. elaine is a mother of three last summer her four year old daughter was raped once really learned what happened she found the man responsible and beat him to death. well looking back i can only said i just wanted to be sure this

security council sanction for. strong measures against syria so i think they learned from their deadly mistake on the libya case when they abstain that this thing has no end if it's allowed to pass. on the ground in libya other countries and probably to a monarch it off he has survived a nato air strike on his house in tripoli but his youngest son and three grandchildren were killed in the attack earlier this week russia's prime minister urged coalition to stop breaching the un resolution with apparent attempts on the libyan leader's life. to ensure the coalition said destroying get their feet was not they kill him his palaces some officials have claimed that eliminating him was in fact they go who gave the rights did he have a fair trial returning to the new florrie's or the buildings are destroying the country's an infrastructure when the so-called civilized world uses all its military power against a small country destroying what's been created by generations i don't know if that's good. france fears its leading

security council's their solutions to. eight safety zones in the country to cooperate with the u.n. security council on distribution of humanitarian aid throughout the country to follow the road map presented by the african union and to let international observers inside the country that would be monitoring how those resolutions are fulfilled however in a very sure and libyan authorities has conditions under which they will introduce that the people who go to use tripoli is willing to consider approaches based on the african union road map for peace they are ready to fully meet the requirements of the un resolution only what's in it was necessary for the opposition to make similar moves and for nato to stop stalling turn into a lover of once again stressed that nato is actions in libya to be younger solutions of the un security council and that there is no military solution to this whole thing and even though russia is not a mediator in this particular conflict it does agree with the road map presented by the african union opposition members are also to come to moscow to hold talks

security council we will discuss trying to understand what is planned because that aggression is from the money that we are seeing are enough to learn lessons with international opposition on the rois state space an open field told to make the case for more war but britain's prime minister will dealt sending ground troops to libya his defense secretary admitted to parliament they planned exactly that but you have members good at the number of civilian deaths from nato public drawing likely to welcome its collation of the conflict that it was your god see blood the meantime british politician john baron who was among those who voted against intervention in libya he says that nato could have done more to resolve the conflict before starting its operations you can watch our things interview next hour but here's a preview. this is where the if you like the vagueness of the resolution picks in because it does talk about and forcing a no fly zone and protecting civilians and using all necessary measures to implement that policy could theoretically you that we in the story makers improve to

security council and that there is no military solution to this called and even though russia is not a year lateral mediator in this particular conflict it does agree with the road map that was presented by the african union opposition members are also to come to moscow to hold talks with foreign minister lavrov over the visit has been postponed it was supposed to come to morrow nonetheless they're still coming to mostly they're still willing to talk however many are saying that there's some clear cut reasons why the rebel government doesn't want a ceasefire washington's perfect mentally via mahmoud jibril the leader of libya's transitional national council leapt in study in the u.s. for years and on his latest visit to washington he didn't fail to show how devoted he is to american values we. really believe and we really aspire that our message will get across to the american public that we are really here to join hands to build a democratic a dream and the libyan soil and washington they join hands with those seeking to replace gadhafi and take over power in libya to help prop them

security council should adopt a new resolution and libya resolution one thousand seven hundred three there's not invisible man operations we need a new resolution. and forces planned there all along says a leading u.s. law professor clearly what we're seeing are unfold here in libya is a pre existing war play out by nato by the british by the french by the americans and with care the the everything now is going according to plan which is why i believe that since they have failed to do polls could our feet which are steps are sold far the next stage will be moving into a ground invasion and nato powers have jukes the international community into supporting war and those one or them protecting civilians was the claim that's grabbing the country's resources is the real goal this is one of the most the. reason transgressions of rights of nation national sovereignty and international law that we've seen in the post-war period the west the u.s. and france and britain have been called virtually according to the evidence that's leaking out covertly arming the opposition to gadhafi in hopes o

security council we will discuss trying to understand what is planned because the negligence from the mandate that we are seeing now are enough to learn lessons with international opposition on the rois need two states face an open field tossed to make the case for more war for britain's prime minister will dealt sending ground troops to libya his defense secretary admitted to parliament they planned exactly that but you have members or good at the number of civilian deaths from nato bombing a drawing likely to welcome escalation of the conflict altie london and for more on the possibility of ground troops in libya earlier i spoke to alan cooperman he's a professor at the university of texas at austin news author of this book the limits of man a tarion intervention genocide in rwanda now he told me why he believes sending ground forces into libya is not only a bad idea but is mission creep and not authorized under the u.n. mandate. i think that president obama sort of revealed his hand early on even though the u.n. resolution only authorized military action to protect civilians. presi

security council we will discuss trying to understand what is planned because the negligence from the money that we're seeing now are enough to learn lessons with international opposition on the rois they two states face an uphill task to make the case for more war britain's prime minister will dell sending ground troops to libya his defense secretary of methods of parliament they plan exactly that but you have members good at the number of civilian deaths from nato bombing a drone likely to welcome escalation of the conflict r.t. london. so while the world is currently caught up in what it means now that we're post bin laden and tries to weave through all the details of exactly how the getting rid of him mission went down let's not forget there's an entirely different war still going on in libya hillary clinton brokered a deal today in italy with the libya contact group to fund the rebels that's not the only sign of mission creep as the e.u. now says that its humanitarian aid mission might need ground troops and balad require a new u.n. resolution so two months in it's become quite c

s homeland security council. -- human rights council. >> at least 643 civilians killed. more than 9,000 detained. whole cities shelled by their own government. so why has the outside world done so little to try to end the bloodshed in syria? it's a very tough, brutal regime willing to use force against its other people. another reason why it deserves to be condemned in the strongest terms by countries all around the world. >> a serious revolution facing all-out military assault. there's been condemnation from the west, but little action. europe has just imposed sanctions on some syrian officials, but not on president assad. it's no different in egypt. yet the west still told its great ally hosni mubarak to go. very different too in libya, but the united nations mandated air strikes to protect the uprising against muammar gaddafi. what makes syria different to egypt or libya, according to some western diplomats, is that there's not the same demand for the regime to go. not the same demand, perhaps, within the country. some think the protesters respect a minority and not t

security council should adopt a new resolution and libya resolution one thousand seven hundred three does not invisible man operations we need a new resolution. and forces plan that all along says a leading u.s. law professor clearly what we're seeing unfold here in libya is a pre existing war play out are by nato by the british by the french by the americans with hair moved everything now is following a forty five am which is why i believe that since they have failed to do polls gadhafi with the steps are solved far the next stage will be moving into a ground invasion later powers of jupiters the international community into supporting war and that's one of them protecting civilians was the claim but driving the country's resources is the real goal this is one of the most the worries and transgressions of the rights of nation national sovereignty and international law that we've seen in the post-war period the west the u.s. and france and britain have been called virtually according to the evidence that's leaking out covertly arming the opposition to gadhafi in hopes of grabbing con

s decided to request their own a permanent seat and the u.n. security u.n. security council in spite of a planned overhaul of the use of common defense security and foreign policy but the move has not been met favorably by member states that already have a seat on the council britain and france the u.k. said it will not give up its own place of the body for the sake of putting a united europe there. i mean charles thinks that britain will fight to defend its u.n. influence. there's no way that the british government or the british can serve the delegation and i speak for the conservatives in the european power that we would support any move which weakened our ability to project our foreign policy interests and clearly being founding members of the un security council with a veto as a permanent member this is a major plank in being able to project our foreign policy interests and indeed we were so successful recently in collaboration with our french colleagues in securing un security council resolution nineteen seventy three over libya so no we would not give

security council we will discuss trying to understand what is planned because the denigrations from the mandate that we are seeing now are enough to learn lessons with international opposition on the rois the two states recent open tours to make the case for more war or britain's prime minister will dealt sending ground troops to libya his defense secretary of muted to paula but they played exactly that but you have members good at the number of civilian deaths from nato bombing a drawing likely to welcome this collation of the conflict that you want your party london and not going to go far apart pop show for much more news and analysis stating will be back here in a half hour or so much more. the official antti obligation on the phone called touch from the. life on the go. video on demand she smiling old comes and says feeds now in the palm of your. question on the call to calm. a telemarketer broadcasting live from washington d.c. coming up today on the big picture. more news today violence is once again flared up. and these are the images the world is seeing from the streets of cana

security council on giving block more say over world's acuteness move to damage the strength of some member states independence from georgians have to turn to the international human rights court to get justice for the murder committed by a high ranking officials exposing an inherent flaw in the country's much transit legal system. and special reports looks like eating up was and can be a boom in the risky business. the. into walls of this is in the early polls along a little. own household wealth ok. thank you both the sun through this is in cuba locals who are long over. thank you . for the motion complete with over. i know my name is jemma are hot from the village of bottling. and we have orange groves. ok and i know it's been our job since we were born as i know . there's my father and my brother and hired help. well you know the day after the war was over i came back with my father. i know what has been. seen as summer had passed and that we have what are the groups that you mentioned just a minute with the suffering. with me. and it was then that he stepped on one of their for

security council welcomes the death of osama bin laden, calling it a critical development in the fight against terrorism. shot on sight, he was killed in this room at a compound in pakistan. president obama says justice has been done. >> this is a good day for america. our country has kept its commitment to see that justice is done. the world is safer. it is a better place because of the death of osama bin laden. >> his death comes nearly 10 years after the 9/11 attacks, and the victims speak of their joy. >> wonderful. i am very, very happy about it. there is a feeling of satisfaction in my heart that we got him. >> osama is dead, but questions now about what happens to al qaeda. welcome to "bbc world news," broadcasting to our viewers on pbs in america and elsewhere around the world. the security council urged all nations to remain a diligent and intensify their efforts to bring all perpetrators of sponsors of terrorism to justice. the al qaeda leader was killed in a top-secret shoot-to-kill. >> for many, this was about the very icon of evil. he cast a dark shadow as a symbol of murd