union in the end would come alongside monetary union ones. actors and publics would understand and that situation is forced upon us now where we actually see that the member states are you losing actual sovereignty and they find it very hard to somehow rebuild that sovereignty on the european level that's a contradiction here but i was going to ask charles real quick it's a contradiction right here because at a time when you need more political union to save the euro to save the union itself if there is a time when it's least popular because of austerity i mean you have you know you have the germans and the dutch and they'll say you know why do we have to pay for the austerity of somebody else we didn't lied to get into this it's monetary union i mean this is the worst possible time for quote unquote more europe at least politically. well i would agree with that and i think that there is a growing gap between the institutions of europe and the need for governance and the politics of europe which are becoming increasingly skeptical of the e.u.

cross out the end of the communist party of the soviet union i'm joined by ronald suny in and arbor he is a professor of social and political history at the university of michigan in princeton we have mark bystander he is professor of politics at princeton university all right gentlemen this is cross-eyed i mean you can jump in anytime you want mark if i go to you first and princeton the primary reason why i'm doing this not only is it the twentieth anniversary of the end of the communist party of the soviet union but to remind people of the events of nine hundred ninety one and how much it really changed the world and how we how the world is. moved on from one great epic conflict to maybe another epic conflict and we can throw in the economic crisis here what is the most important legacy of what happened twenty years ago in the country that i'm living in right now russia well i think for there's a there's a global legacy obviously the end of the cold war the end of the. vision of the planet within russia russia had been ruled soviet union had been ruled by a party state essentially an

what industry describing thanks to unions or with unions, autos, no. steel nosnow. >> it is the fact that union membership in the private sector fell from 7.2 fo6.9 in 2010 and also unions lost 612,000 members there is a drop in the private sector. >> one, if workers don't . unions they don't have to vote for them. we have seen the greatest income disparity in the history of the country. three, what point do we stop blaming everything to unions. >> it creating jobs it the number one job we all have. >> that is true. you can see in the south and other parts. autocompanies coming in with nonunion labor . wages are good. and everyone comes out ahead. they killed the auto industry and steel industry and so where do they go? jobs are less plentiful. remember david. 30 or 40 years ago gm only now has 41,000 workers. >> job creation is what we need. union membership or anything else? >> we get job creation from originality and entrepreneurship and innovation . we'll get that with competitive industries and unions. if we had competition we wouldn't have destro

process of the end of the communist party of the soviet union i'm joined by ronald sunni and arbor he is a professor of social and political history at the university of michigan in princeton we have mark bystander he is professor of politics at princeton university all right gentlemen this is cross-like that means you can jump in anytime you want mark if i go to you first and princeton the primary reason why i'm doing this not only is it the twentieth anniversary of the end of the communist party of the soviet union but to remind people of the events of nine hundred ninety one and how much it really changed the world and how we how the world is. moved on from one great epic conflict to maybe another epic conflict and we can throw in the economic crisis here what is the most important legacy of what happened twenty years ago in the country that i'm living in right now russia well i think for there's a there's a global legacy obviously the end of the cold war the end of the division of the planet within russia russia had been ruled soviet union had been ruled by a party state essential

cross out the end of the communist party of the soviet union i'm joined by ronald suny in and arbor he is a professor of social and political history at the university of michigan in princeton we have mark bystander he is professor of politics at princeton university all right gentlemen this is cross-eyed that means you can jump in anytime you want mark if i go to you first and princeton the primary reason why i'm doing this not only is it a twentieth anniversary of the end of the communist party of the soviet union but to remind people of the events of nine hundred ninety one and how much it really changed the world and how we how the world is moved on from one great epic conflict to maybe another epic conflict and we can throw in the economic crisis here what is the most important legacy of what happened twenty years ago in the country that i'm living in right now russia well i think for there is that there's a global legacy obviously the end of the cold war the end of the. vision of the planet within russia russia had been ruled soviet union had been ruled by a party state essential

party is finally over at least it was twenty years ago the end of the communist party of the soviet union was the final step before the collapse of the u.s. that's all right so what are the parties positive and negative legacies could have it reformed itself and changed the course of history. in the. process of the end of the communist party of the soviet union i'm joined by ronald sunni and arbor he is a professor of social and political history at the university of michigan in princeton we have mark bystander he is professor of politics at princeton university all right gentlemen this is cross-eyed i mean you can jump in anytime you want mark if i go to you first and princeton the primary reason why i'm doing this not only is it a twentieth anniversary of the end of the communist party of the soviet union but to remind people of the events of nine hundred ninety one and how much it really changed the world and how we how the world is. moved on from one great epic conflict to maybe another epic conflict and we can throw in the economic crisis here what is the most important legacy of wha

union in the end would come alongside monetary union ones. actors and publics would understand and that situation is forced upon us now where we actually see that a member states are you losing actual sovereignty and they find it very hard to somehow rebuild that sovereignty on the european level h.-l. says that's a contradiction here but i was going to ask charles real quick this the contradiction right here because it's time when you need more political union to save the euro to save the union itself if there is a time when it's least popular because of austerity i mean you have you know you have the germans and the gods say you know why do we have to pay for the austerity of somebody else we didn't lied to get into this it's monetary union i mean this is the worst possible time for quote unquote more europe at least politically. well i would agree with that and i think that there is a growing gap between the institutions of europe and the need for governance and the politics of europe which are becoming increasingly skeptical of the e.u. a

a union or racial well look i mean i think the reason for the objective of the customs union to be c. is zero seats to improve that you know to make it easier for russian companies as well as cars or companies to do more business with each other because that level of . interaction that gets between two former soviet countries g countries that were very close together in the past you know and has been allowed follow fall away so the customs union is designed to bring that closer and to increase the level of business it's too low right now you know the odd one out there is better routes to some extent and its economy is is in a much less favorable position than either russia has extended course the difference is it doesn't have oil it doesn't have natural resources to export with the other two countries do and remember kazakstan is well chosen the next couple of years hopefully will bring the kashagan oil field a million barrels of oil a day or you feel downstream and that will substantially improve its economy in economic position if you like and then rejects that balance with russia t

party is finally over at least it was twenty years ago the end of the communist party of the soviet union was the final step before the collapse of the us that's all right so what are the parties positive and negative legacies could have it reformed itself and changed the course of history. in. the. process of the end of the communist party of the soviet union i'm joined by ronald suny in and arbor he is a professor of social and political history at the university of michigan in princeton we have mark bystander he is professor of politics at princeton university all right gentlemen this is cross-eyed i mean you can jump in anytime you want mark if i go to you first in princeton the primary reason why i'm doing this not only is it the twentieth anniversary of the end of the communist party of the soviet union but to remind people of the events of nine hundred ninety one and how much it really changed the world and how we how the world is. moved on from one great epic conflict to maybe another epic conflict and we can throw in the economic crisis here what is the most important legacy of w

cross-talk the end of the communist party of the soviet union i'm joined by ronald suny in and arbor he is a professor of social and political history at the university of michigan in princeton we have mark bystander he is professor of politics at princeton university all right gentlemen this is cross-eyed that means you can jump in anytime you want mark if i go to you first and princeton the primary reason why i'm doing this not only is it the twentieth anniversary of the end of the communist party of the soviet union but to remind people of the events of nine hundred ninety one and how much it really changed the world and how we how the world is moved on from one great epic conflict to maybe another epic conflict and we can throw in the economic crisis here what is the most important legacy of what happened twenty years ago in the country that i'm living in right now russia well i think for there is that there's a global legacy obviously the end of the cold war the end of the division of the planet within russia russia had been ruled soviet union had been ruled by a party state ess

process of the end of the communist party of the soviet union i'm joined by ronald suny and an arbor he is a professor of social and political history at the university of michigan in princeton we have mark bystander he is professor of politics at princeton university all right gentlemen this is cross-eyed that means you can jump in anytime you want mark if i go to you first in princeton the primary reason why i'm doing this not only is it the twentieth anniversary of the end of the communist party of the soviet union but to remind people of the events of nine hundred ninety one and how much it really changed the world in how we how the world is. moved on from one great epic conflict to maybe another epic conflict and we can throw in the economic crisis here what is the most important legacy of what happened twenty years ago in the country that i'm living in right now russia well i think for there is that there's a global legacy obviously the end of the cold war the end of the division of the planet within russia russia had been ruled soviet union had been ruled by a party state esse

especially union ones. union teachers are happy that they can't be suddenly fired but the charter teachers can be. >> you can get canned in a moment. does that bother you? >> if i'm not doing my job per se and i was tired for that, so be it. >> fy was is a doctor and i wasn't good, i mean i wouldn't have a job. no one would come to me, right? >> i would hope not? >> you cannot maintain quality unless you can fire people says this charter founder. >> it is as many as we must and as little as we can. >> have you fired more than ten? >> in three schools in eight years, yes. >> but while bad teachers might get fired good teachers are given freedom. >> they can choose their textbooks and their teaching methods as long as they every quarter and every year make sure that the students are learning what they need to learn at the end of the bay in harlem, 43% of 8th graders get passing grades on state math tests. 100% of her kids passed. if such charters work why aren't there more of them? >> because unions and suppo

union opponents cite this strike as a blow against union tyranny. as proof that collective bargaining has no place in government, or they state it as the galvanizing moment of the reagan presidency, reagan's singlemost significant, symbolic act. but as i try to argue in this book, probing more deeply into the story behind this conflict moves us beyond superficial observations and sheds light on the forces that remade america between 1960 when this story began and 1981 when the air traffic controllers struck creating a defining moment in recent american history. understanding those forces, i think, gives us important lessons for today. to set the context for this and to explain more about what i mean here, i'd like to read a passage from the introduction to my book. the intro is called, "getting the picture," and that title refers -- i know there's at least one controller here tonight, one former controller, maybe others. folks who know air traffic control know what that phrase means. it refers to the procedure that air traffic controllers go through

crossed at the end of the communist party of the soviet union i'm joined by ronald suny in and arbor is a professor of social and political history at the university of michigan in princeton we have mark eisinger he is professor of politics at princeton university all right gentlemen this is cross-eyed then you can jump in anytime you want mark if i can go to you first in princeton the primary reason why i'm doing this not only is it being twentieth anniversary of the end of the communist party of the soviet union but to remind people of the events of nine hundred ninety one and how much it really changed the world and how we how the world is. moved on from one great epic conflict to maybe another epic conflict and we can throw in the economic crisis here what is the most important legacy of what happened twenty years ago in the country that i'm living in right now russia well i think for there is a there's a global legacy obviously the end of the cold war the end of the division of the planet within russia russia had been ruled soviet union had been ruled by. a party state essential

vision of the planet within russia russia had been ruled soviet union had been ruled by a party state essentially and then the communist party ended in essence and as it unraveled in essence that control over the state unravelled and also its control over the public sphere also and it so there was a whole rush of of movements. tendencies that just took over the public sphere that you know couldn't make itself felt under the common and under communist rule right all the time do you do you think it's underestimated the day when we think about it to be the all powerful communist party of the soviet union and it was pointed out just a second ago it's global ramifications because it just wasn't the the soviet union itself it was an entire of what people would call an empire some people even called an evil empire this conflict between the west and the communist world came to an end when the communist party finally collapsed and peacefully and out. right maybe that's one of the latencies is that there wasn't a civil war there wasn't a great deal of bloodletting there were some ethnic conflic

also, the union and non-union shops working side by side. deliveries of materials that have the potential for disruptions. the pla says all of those work stoppages aside, which is important to us as we try to maintain our overall schedule and we have significant costs that we realize that we are subject to delays. also, we are going to have 50 or 60 trade subcontracts on this contract and about 250 total subcontractors working over 4.5 million hours of labor on this job, so there is just a lot of activity -- two or sometimes three shifts of work. what we call stacking of trades. multiple contractors working in the same area at the same time, and all of that increases the potential for disputes between trades. some of the benefits of the pla -- as we mentioned, it reduces the risk of those types of work disruptions and stoppages. the opportunity for cost disruptions overruns that. establishes the rules for holidays, work rules, setting aside some of the unions have specific black friday's, which are the fridays before recognized holidays, so

unions 30 years ago and unions today. different time? >> i think there is a difference in philosophy. the workers make a lot of money and the workers should share in that. the capitalist share. you don't share that share. it is a bargaining tool. and in a free market society everyone bargains. and if there is a grevance and people are not treated properly yes, there is a reason for a otherwise there innocent. >> coming up. everybody. under water or over the top? new trend proving there is not a sig stigma for sloughing off responsibilities. we report and you decide. >> plus, what on gop candidates are debating in south carolina. newt gingrich who trailed the pack new cbs poll has him tied with romney and trailing herman cain by three percent. in justs the take the field for a game. and fans are being falled on to wear blue in support of child abuse victims. >>> and colan ray lost his grand daughter to an undiagnosed nur logical disorder. all that and more coming up. i hope you join us . >> they walked away and are glad they . homeowners

union in the end would come alongside monetary union ones. actors and publics would understand and that situation is forced upon us now where we actually see that the member states are using actual sovereignty and they find it very hard to somehow rebuild that sovereignty on the european level h.l. says that's a contradiction here i was going to ask charles real quickly it's a contradiction right here because at a time when you need more political union to save the euro to save the union itself it is a time when it's least popular because of austerity i mean you have you know you have the germans and the dutch and also you know why do we have to pay for the austerity of somebody else we didn't live to get into this it's monetary union i mean this is the worst possible time for a quote unquote more europe at least politically. well i would agree with that and i think that there is a growing gap between the institutions of europe and the need for governance and the politics of europe which are becoming increasingly skeptical of the e.u. and thi

union in the end would come alongside monetary union ones. actors and publics would understand and that situation is first upon us now where we actually see that a member states are using actual sovereignty and they find it very hard to somehow rebuild that sovereignty on the european level that's a contradiction here i was going to ask charles real quick because the contradiction right here because of the time when you need more political union to save the euro to save the union itself it is a time when it's least popular because of austerity i mean you have you know you have the germans and the gotcha and also you know why do we have to pay for the austerity of somebody else we didn't lie to get into this monetary union i mean this is the worst possible time for quote unquote more europe at least politically . well i would agree with that and i think that there is a growing gap between the institutions of europe and the need for governance and the politics of europe which are becoming increasingly skeptical of the e.u. and this is something

came in forty years after the european union was formed the european union existed perfectly happily without the euro for forty years it's a mistake to say i think because child stars that europe would become just a free trade area if the euro disappeared it would still be a customs union with a common tariff that still be a single market which is the most important achievement and of course in foreign policy the europeans can perfectly happily cooperate without the euro britain and france work perfectly think ever well together in libya without the euro being involved if the countries want to cooperate in foreign policy they can happily do so so although there's a consensus growing between washington and brussels i think it's a false consensus which is leading europe into deflation and i think although there may be difficulties if anything happened to the euro in the long run i think it would allow european countries to grow again because the euro is proving a terrible constraint on the growth in particular of the mediterranean car and i want to talk about we want to go to about a g

related to that wasn't the idea that monetary union would go hand in hand with political union and then as charles i said there was the idea that political union in the end would come alongside monetary union ones. actors and publics would understand and that situation is forced upon us now where we actually see that a member states are using actual sovereignty and they find it very hard to somehow rebuild that sovereignty on the european level that's that's the contradiction here but i was going to ask charles real quick this the contradiction right here because at a time when you need more political union to save the euro to save the union itself it is a time when it's least popular because of austerity i mean you have you know you have the germans and the dutch and also you know why do we have to pay for the austerity of somebody else we didn't lied to get into this it's monetary union i mean this is the worst possible time for quote unquote more europe at least politically. well i would agree with that and i think that there is a growing gap between the institutions of europe and th

union in the end would come alongside monetary union ones. actors and publics would understand and that situation is forced upon us now where we actually see that a member states are using actual sovereignty and they find it very hard to somehow rebuild that sovereignty on the european level that's that's a contradiction here but i was going to ask charles real quick this the contradiction right here because at a time when you need more political union to save the euro to save the union itself it is a time when it's least popular because of austerity mean you have you know you have the germans and the dutch and also you know why do we have to pay for the austerity of somebody else we didn't lie digging into this it's monetary union i mean this is the worst possible time for a quote unquote more europe at least politically. probably would agree with that and i think that there is a growing gap between the institutions of europe and the need for governance and the politics of europe which are becoming increasingly skeptical of the e.u. and this

across not the end of the communist party of the soviet union i'm joined by ronald suny in and arbor is a professor of social and political history at the university of michigan in princeton we have mark bystander he is professor of politics at princeton university all right gentlemen this is cross like i mean you can jump in anytime you want mark if i can go to you first and princeton for the primary reason why i'm doing this not only is it the twentieth anniversary of the end of the communist party of the soviet union but to remind people of the events of nine hundred ninety one and how much it really changed the world and how we how the world is. moved on from one great epic conflict to maybe another epic conflict and we can throw in the economic crisis here what is the most important legacy of what happened twenty years ago in the country that i'm living in right now russia well i think for there's a there's a global legacy obviously the end of the cold war the end of the division of the planet within russia or russia have been ruled soviet union have been ruled by a party state

party is finally over at least it was twenty years ago the end of the communist party of the soviet union was the final step before the collapse of the u.s.'s all right so what are the parties positive and negative legacies could have it reformed itself and changed the course of history. in. the. process of the end of the communist party of the soviet union i'm joined by ronald suny and then an arbor he is a professor of social and political history at the university of michigan in princeton we have mark bystander he is professor of politics at princeton university all right gentlemen this is cross-eyed i mean you can jump in anytime you want mark if i go to you first and princeton the primary reason why i'm doing this not only is it the twentieth anniversary of the end of the communist party of the soviet union but to remind people of the events of nine hundred ninety one and how much it really changed the world and how we how the world is moved on from one great epic conflict to maybe another epic conflict and we can throw in the economic crisis here what is the most important legacy of

region union much more powerful. move is because like we won't repeat the mistakes of the european union in our integration we're conscious or we're doing i understand who we are integrating with you know three countries sharing a common history and today will form in a common economy that is why we start not on different levels but from similar positions the european union to shorten a doctor's time which stands our situation is different i'm sure we will be able to create a solid and stable economic union. this union is being beast on the foundation of the customs union between russia kazakhstan and belarus all just three states but its future vision is much bigger just picture of content a ration of state stretching possibly from the balkans and all the way to the pacific a huge bridge between europe and asia perhaps it's too soon to talk about that at the moment since russia was in kazakhstan just put together a committee which will be working to develop this idea further but just to give you an understanding of

be provocative you did glasnost and perestroika destroy the communist party of the soviet union. i'd have to say of the two glasnost destroyed the communist party of the soviet union the communist party of the soviet union was built as an instrument basically to control the state and to control the public sphere and once you opened up the public sphere the communist party really couldn't control it that the the debates that tore the communist party apart were essentially over the impact of grossness now a lot of people talk about the economy and how the economy and economic competition destroyed the communist party there is some truth in that in that but i think that that really wasn't the central element of what happened in fact i think the so you know it could have survived for a long time had no no pressing economic crisis what it had was a legitimacy crisis. and that's where. you know glasnost came in. you know when sure noble occurred for instance and it just highlighted the the gulf between the party and and the truth and so it was basically already you know six or seven mo

many people who are not unionized benefit from unions. i just introduced a resolution that commands organized labor, because what happens is that where there are not unionized workers, the companies that are competing against a unionized company tend to give basically the same benefits. that the union workers get. and so it unions -- it is where all ships are listed by -- lifted by the rising tide. host: some concerns on the vote that will happen at to 30 p.m. of the nlrb about the way that the vote has been called. the detect chairman -- the democratic-appointed chairman has called his vote and as noted that he needs to college before the end of the year because the national labor relations board might lose its other democratic member. or is going to, he is a recess appointment. the one lone republican on the board has threatened to step down on how this election has been called. this is a letter that bryan hayes, the republican member of the board, wrote in his criticism of how this vote has come up. this is the november 18 letter to th

and here is expressed interest in joining the union. as you know there is the or asian economic community comprised of five nations apart from russia to roost in kazakhstan it also includes critical stand on kurdistan when the decision was taken several years ago five years ago to be precise to scale up integration we went for a multi level and modestly type of integration point all of those five countries realize that three of them are fit to move on to the next stage that is why our creole side how to return a more advanced level within the reason economic community basically it's a second tier it was agreed upon reaching this new level the trio will not forget about the remaining two members of the eurasian economic community which are now candidates which could follow suit and move on to this new level of integration but the list of candidates is not limited to these two countries the eurasian economic community has a number of associates and partners who take an active part in the work of this community so to sum up we see interest

a union. one month. cases where delays have occurred? yes. without a doubt these are the exceptions to the rule, and former and current members of the nlrb have cited partisan shifts on the board as the leading cause of such delay. a broken board is no excuse for trampling on the rights of american workers. i'm aware the board recently revised, meaning yesterday, its earlier proposal and setaside some of the more egregious provisions, however the latest iterations still denies employers access to a fair election process, still drives workers of the opportunity to make a fully informed decision, and still perpetuates the threat of more punitive measures in the future. the board teams utterly determined to finalize a flawed proposal regardless of the damage to the integrity of the board and our workplaces. we must act now. the work force democracy and fairness act reaffirms work force protections our nation has enjoyed for decades. employers currently have a fair opportunity to prepare for a pre

regime union much more powerful. bluewater is because we will repeat the mistakes of the european union in our integration we're conscious of what we're doing much understand who we are integrating with what you know three countries sharing a common history and today we are filming a common economy that is why we start not on different levels but from similar position it's the european union to be sure not dollars which stands for our situation is different it's not sure we'll be able to create it's knowledge and stable knowledge usage and money was so use this union is being beast on the foundation of the customs union between russia kazakhstan and belarus all just three states but its future vision is much bigger just picture a confirmation of state stretching possibly from the balkans and all the way to the pacific a huge bridge between europe and asia perhaps it's too soon to talk about that at the moment since russia belarus and kazakhstan just put together a committee which will be working to develop this idea

this union fought for a type of unionism has labeled as a social unionism or social justice unionism, and the work for its members wanted to obviously helped get them higher wages that benefit that our working conditions. but that union also worked along with parents, worked along with community activists in order to save public education and that is the gist of the social unionism. by the 1930's when the communists led rank-and-file caucuses of the union gained control of the union, it helped create a harlem committee, and that committee worked to build new school buildings in that community by the early 1940's and created a williamsburg council which also worked to create a better education who have your schools to work on funding, proper funding for children. it is the attack on this union by the 1950's that sort of helped eliminate that important voice, and i'm going to end here by a reading an excerpt from my book noting that the atmosphere that was created in the 1950's. in the spring of 1957, joseph and o'keefe, a young substitute social studies teacher gave her eighth grade cl

we do have provisions to go to the union hiring halls for referrals, but at any point the unions are unable to fulfill the call, the contractors participating are free to go beyond the union hiring hall for employment, but the first stop is the hiring hall. at least in today's environment, the unions are showing as they have an ample supply to meet our needs, but i think part of it -- and part of the benefit of it is improving the communication and awareness of our programs in the unions so that they know this work is coming and when our packages will be coming out, and then we can plan with their members accordingly. >> there is one phrase that says for the trade unions that will be signatory to the pla. are there any that are not? >> at this point, we do not anticipate any. >> with regard to the committee, are there specific reporting requirements from the pla or that are housed within the pla for the benefits of any of the programs that will be put in place? ways to evaluate that the committee will be recommending or reviewing that the board will be able to review? >> there's not

unions, saying nurses unions. nurses unions have been relatively successful in saying that their fights are also on behalf of the profession and also on behalf of the patient anyway the teachers unions have been unsuccessful in doing that witnessed the success of the popular success of the reformers narrative. and so i am wondering how you explained that difference in the medical workers union and how you find that difference and i ask how much of that has to do with new york city teachers strike? >> that is an excellent question and i do covered in my book. [laughter] but, communism and civil rights and the new york city's teachers union. but one of the major battles in new york city was over which direction teachers union that someone's going to take and this erupted in the 1930s. the type of unionism that i describe here emphasized by the new york city teachers union, social unionism, did have the sort of rotter definition fighting along with parents, fighting along with the civic leaders to democratize educati

if it provocateur did glasnost and perestroika destroy the communist party of the soviet union. i'd have to say of the two glasnost destroyed the communist party of the soviet union the communist party of the soviet union was built as an instrument basically to control the state and to control the public sphere and once you open up the public sphere that the communist party really couldn't control it that the the debates that tore the communist party apart were essentially over the impact of glasnost now a lot of people talk about the economy and how the economy and economic competition destroyed the communist party. there is some truth in that in that but i think that that really wasn't the central element of what happened in fact i think the soviet union could have survived for a long time and had no no pressing economic crisis what it had was a legitimacy crisis and. that's where. you know glasnost came in. you know i'm sure noble occurred for instance it just highlighted the the gulf between the party and and the truth and so it was basically already you know six or seven mo

antares expressed interest in joining the union. as you know there is the or asian economic community comprised of five nations apart from russia and kazakhstan it also includes to decus done kirk has done on the decision was taken several years ago five years ago to be precise to scale up integration we went for a multi level and modestly type of integration point all of those five countries realize that three of them are fit to move on to the next stage was wired creole side how to reach a more advanced level within the religion economic community basically to second tier it was agreed upon reaching this new level the trio will not forget about the remaining two members of the eurasian economic community which are now candidates which could follow suit and move on to this new level of integration but the list of candidates is not limited to these two countries the eurasian economic community has a number of associated partners who take an active part in the work of this community so to sum up we see interest from other countries a

and here is expressed interest in joining the union. as you know there is the or asian economic community comprised of five nations apart from russia and kazakhstan it also includes to have done kurdistan when the decision was taken several years ago five years ago to be precise to scale up integration we went for a multilevel and multi-speed type of integration of a point all of those five countries realize that three of them are fit to move on to the next stage others why are creole side how to reach a more advanced level within the relation economic community basically to second tier it was agreed upon reaching this new level the trio will not forget about the remaining two members of the eurasian economic community which are now candidates which could follow suit and move on to this new level of integration but the list of candidates is not limited to these two countries the eurasian economic community has a number of associates and partners who take an active part in the work of this community so to sum up we seem just from other c

antares expressed interest in joining the union. as you know there is the eurasian economic community comprise the five nations apart from some cousins it also includes to dick a stand on kurdistan when the decision was taken several years ago five years ago to be precise to scale up integration we went for a multi level and multi-speed type of integration a plot point all of those five countries realize that three of them are fit to move on to the next strange buzz wire trio somehow to reach a more advanced level within the relation economic community basically it's a second tier that was agreed upon reaching this new level the trio will not forget about the remaining two members of the eurasian economic community which are now candidates which could follow suit and move on to this new level of integration with a list of candidates is not limited to these two countries the eurasian economic community has a number of associates and partners and take an active part in the work of this community so just as we see interest from other c

in the end. 180,000 more voted against obama care than voted against the union law. so, what ended up happening, a lot of people out there supporting the unions were voting down the president's health care laws and some of the very union people out there protecting their own rights. so, i mean, what this does say to republicans, obviously, a very strong issue for them going to health care, and does resonate probably more than union questions. >> and i would just add, again, what kim said to reiterate. if you're he a republican next year you probably want to run health care not against collective bargaining. >> what about results in virginia and new jersey. the president has spent a lot of time in virginia in particular, and he won that in 2008 and hopes to do it again. what's the he message from the races let's say legislature this week? >> you know, the white house is putting a lot of hopes on places like virginia to potentially even out, potential losses they might have in other traditional swing states so they're spending a lot of time in virginia, north carolina,

who's in a union, who's not in a union, who's in a public union, who's in a private union, who's black, who's white, who's gay, who's straight. they divided us right down the middle. we're now united. >> you know, we've been in a class war for a long time, but it's only been the upper 1% using all their power and money to look out for themselves. it's time that the 99% -- >> the country is watching ohio. no doubt. congresswoman betty sutton, and congressman tim ryan of ohio. thanks for joining us tonight. >>> next, the latest on today's explosive development for the herman cain campaign. >>> and later, since republicans are down in the polls heading into tomorrow's vote, they're trying every dirty trick in the book. john nichols of "the nation" joins me. stay with us. >>> welcome back to "the ed show." live from columbus, ohio. where republican governor john kasich is trying to spin his assault on public workers as something positive. more on that coming up. >>> but there is other news of the day. how will republican presidential candidate herman cain spin this one? today, sharon biale

of the soviet union. how do you see the future of kazakhstan? >> it is very much a place writing its own future. they made commitments, last year, they were the head of the organization of security and cooperation in europe. they made a long-term vision for a western country in the sort of democratic and human rights values. that is not something that is going to happen overnight. over the next five or 10 years into the future, this country will continue to remake itself. it has gone from an impoverished soviet country to a modern, growing one. where it goes next is up to the people. it is a constant process. all countries change, but the pace of change here is something different. from independence to today in the same 200 years the united states took, but here it is only 20. >> i know this is a new posting for you. congratulations on being confirmed by the senate. what do you see as your mission? >> my mission in every country i have served in is to try to implement u.s. policy on a broad basis. in kaza

answer is expressed interest in joining the union. as you know there is the eurasian economic community comprised of five nations apart from russia some kazakhstan it also includes caddick has done kurdistan when the decision was taken several years ago five years ago to be precise to scale up integration we went for a multi level and modesty type of integration point all of those five countries realize that three of them are fit to move on to the next stage that is why our creole side how to reach a more advanced level within the relation economic community basically to second tier it was agreed upon reaching this new level the trio will not forget about the remaining two members of the eurasian economic community which are now candidates which could follow suit and move on to this new level of integration but the list of candidates is not limited to these two countries the eurasian economic community has a number of associates and partners who take an active part in the work of this community so to sum up we see interest from other

this has been an incredible ground swell movement of support for unions and what unions stand for. >> connie schultz, pulitzer prize winning syndicated columnist. it's always great to see you. on the eve of this vote, really all eyes are on ohio. you've helped explain it to a lot of people. thank you. >> thank you, rachel. >> i will mention again in interest of full disclosure that connie's husband is u.s. senator sherrod brown. it's weird to talk about who anybody is married to, but it's relevant. >>> debunktion junction is coming up. tonight is involves j. edgar hoover and lice and what's considered a weapon. that's still to come. >>> plus episcopal minister gene robinson is here for the interview. but if things get out of hand, there's no shame in calling us. ♪call 1-800-steemer. but my nose is still runny. [ male announcer ] truth is, dayquil doesn't treat that. really? [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus fights your worst cold symptoms, plus it relieves your runny nose. [ deep breath] awesome. [ male announcer ] yes, it is. that's the cold truth! ♪ that's good morning, veggi

especially union ones. union teachers are happy that they can't be suddenly fired but the charter teachers can be. >> you can get canned in a moment. does that bother you? >> if i'm not doing my job per se and i was tired for that, so be it. >> fy was is a doctor and i wasn't good, i mean i wouldn't have a job. no one would come to me, right? >> i would hope not? >> you cannot maintain quality unless you can fire people says this charter founder. >> it is as many as we must and as little as we can. >> have you fired more than ten? >> in three schools in eight years, yes. >> but while bad teachers might get fired good teachers are given freedom. >> they can choose their textbooks and their teaching methods as long as they every quarter and every year make sure that the students are learning what they need to learn at the end of the bay in harlem, 43% of 8th graders get passing grades on state math tests. 100% of her kids passed. if such charters work why aren't there more of them? >> because unions and suppo

union because only a political union can support a euro ultimately because then you have a fiscal side and the ego leave it all the way the other direction you can't have this middle ground that they've had for the last decade. there's quite a closer that's what i just mentioned a moment ago notice of choice between national sovereignty and federalism and we need to accept that for certain decisions we have done it for monetary union but not for economic union that things have to be decided at the center say for the seventeen not necessarily for the twenty seven and no longer at the member state level for example if greece last week were to have voted in a referendum or were to have passed it on them and left the choice to the greek citizens that would have meant that the greece greek citizens would have got a veto on fact on economic governance within the euro zone which is almost unheard of let's head there should be there couldn't be of it or against it of course all member states can have all the solutions but if there is a majority deciding in a certain sense you have to go in a c