where is the video of what he did the night of benghazi? geraldo, when they want you to know something they tell it all and they tell it to the "new york times" usually on the front page. what was the president's hour-by-hour schedule the night of the attack on the consulate and annex in benghazi? what was it? we haven't seen it and the reason we haven't is because they don't want to let it out. >> geraldo: don't touch that dial. tossing and turning have given way to sleeping. where sleepless nights yield to restful sleep, and lunesta eszopiclone can help you get there, like it has for so many people before. do not take lunesta if you are allergic to anything in it. when taking lunesta, don't drive or operate machinery until you feel fully awake. walking, eating, driving or engaging in other activities while asleep without remembering it the next day have been reported. lunesta should not be taken together with alcohol. abnormal behaviors may include aggressiveness, agitation, hallucinations or confusion. in depressed patients, worsening of

diplomatic mission in libya and also in benghazi, ultimately in benghazi. mr. cummings, we will have, from time to time, our disagreement. but i know that for all the members of this committee, we understand that these disagreements must be kept on the side of the desk. the brave witnesses deserve this committee was called to testify. the brave whistleblowers are what make this committee and their work so important. we are the ones that lead underneath this president. the public has a right to their accounts. we must respect whistleblowers and work on a bipartisan basis to protect them. with that, i recognize the ranking member for his opening statement. mr. chairman, i want to thank you for calling this hearing. and i want to be clear. i have said it over and over again. no member of congress, be they republican or democrat, who failed to be whistleblowers. i think it is sad when that accusation is made against any member of this congress all of our members, both republicans and democrats, we were tremendously saddened by the deaths of christopher stevens and

diplomatic mission in libya and in benghazi ultimately in benghazi. mr. cummings, we will have, from time to time, our disagreements. i know that for all the members of this committee, we understand that these agreements must be kept on this side of tehhe dais. these brave witnesses deserve the right to the call to testify. these brave whistleblowers are what make this committee's work work. we are the committee that led for new whistle blower protections signed by this president and the public has a right to hear their accounts and we, more than any other committee, must respect whistle- blowers and work on a bipartisan basis always to protect them. with that, i recognize the ranking member for his opening statements. >> mr. chairman, i want to thank you for calling this hearing. i want to be clear. i have said it over and over again. there is no member of this congress be they republican or democrat, who fails to uphold the right of whistle-blowers to come forward. and i sink it is sad when that accusation is made -- and i think it is sad when that accu

benghazi is huge. we have to stay on benghazi. keep reminding people because in the voting booth when people think about these scandals and go to vote in 2014, that's the way to send the message that we're not going to take any of this political elitism anymore. >> they wanted to be a part of history. they did not even want to report that he was untested or about his lack of records. can we blame them for reporting? >> i would never blame the media for anything. it's true. what we're seeing is a therapy session. kind of an intervention for all the media. they didn't break the irs story. the story came to them. i have no sympathy for them now that they've seen their golden hero fall apart. i will say this, president obama is a genius. he said that he wanted to end hyperpartisanship. he did, through his detached corruption, these united factions as desperate as the tea party and the left wing media are uniting saying this guy's an incompetent boob. when he said there was no there there about benghazi, that now actually applies to hi

that was from the january benghazi hearings. that also failed to blow the lid off the giant cover-up propagated by this administration. today, wednesday. >> come wednesday you're going to start hearing the truth about benghazi. it's going to make you mad. it's going to make you upset. >> jon: and if it doesn't, we've have another one until it does. you may be wondering why for benghazi congress has held nine full hearings. including one closed hearing. why ambassador pickerring and admiral mullennish eyed a full accountability report chastising the state department for their systemic failures and why benghazi is generally emerged as a rallying cry for the president's opponents. when during the bush administration, there were 54 attacks on diplomatic targets that killed 13 americans yet garnered only three hearings on embassy security total and zero outrage from fox. why is this attack so different for republicans? >> this makes watergate look like child's play, megan. >> jon: oh! well, that is serious. that is serious and it's n

now, i understand the people on this network care about benghazi, but by and large, benghazi comes in third. because there are millions and millions and millions of americans who are like babies who like to follow shiny objects. these people don't care about benghazi. they know more about jodi arias than benghazi and that's how they like it. that's also troubling. by the way, i wrote what i think is an important piece on this subject on my web site bernard goldberg.com. i hope people will go to read it. the third and final point that i would like to make is about mike huckabee. on his radio show recently he said that barack obama would not survive benghazi. that he wouldn't be able to serve out his second term because of benghazi this is wishful thinking masquerading as political analysis. barack obama is going nowhere because by and large the american people don't care about benghazi. it's not interesting. it's not sexy. doesn't involve a woman who committed murder, doesn't involve any of the things that millions of americans care about. i'm totally depressed over this whole thing. >

diplomatic mission in libya and in benghazi, ultimately in benghazi. mr. cummings, we will have, from time to time, our disagreements. i know that for all the members of this committee, we understand that these agreements must be kept on this side of the dais. these brave witnesses deserve the right to the call to testify. these brave whistleblowers are what make this committee's work work. we are the committee that led for new whistle blower protections signed by this president and the public has a right to hear their accounts we, more than any other committee, must respect whistle- blowers and work on a bipartisan basis always to protect them. with that, i recognize the ranking member for his opening statements. >> mr. chairman, i want to thank you for calling this hearing. i want to be clear. i have said it over and over again. there is no member of this congress, be they republican or democrat, who fails to uphold the right of whistle-blowers to come forward. and i sink it is sad when that accusation is made -- and i think it is sad when that accusatio

] yes, benghazi. following the tragic attacks of eight months ago, benghazi and the rumored cover-up has become problem number one for the obama administration. >> some republicans say the benghazi scandal will cause president obama's downfall. a survey from public policy polling shows 41% of republicans consider it is to be the biggest political scandal in american history. >> stephen: yes, benghazi is the biggest scandal since sliced bread was caught funneling money to nicaraguan death squads. folks, if republicans are angry now, imagine how they'll feel when they learn where benghazi is. >> of the republicans 39% don't know where benghazi is. 6% think it's in cube i can't... [ cheers and applause ] >> stephen: folks, i say this just proves that the scandal is global from benghazi, argentina, all the way to benghazi, japan. this could even hurt obama in his hometown of benghazi, illinois. now, republicans have accused the white house and state department of partisan, political white washing of the t

he also weighed in on the benghazi that'' max this story is b.s. but he did say it would b beneficial to e white house to rease all internal e-mail's about the benghazi talking points and moments ago to release more than 100 pages of females and documents pertaini to the benghazi attack moments ago and a fulleport of this major development straight ahead. but the circumstances still devolving of the associated press phone records leading the president to call for legislation to be introduced that it once opposed a bill that is essentially pretexts the nation's journalist from mr. obama iswn administration and it gets mplicated. the whithouse asked chuck schumer to reintroduce the shield back to limit the white house ability to interfer with news organizations or make reporters reveal their sources and today we found out about the attorney general does not know and varied little about what he does during testimony in front of the house judiciary committee. >> one of the compelling process from a media outlet is to give notice do you know, why that w

where is the video of what he did the night of benghazi? geraldo, when they want you to know something they tell it all and they tell it to the "new york times" usually on the front page. what was the president's hour-by-hour schedule the night of the attack on the consulate and annex in benghazi? what was it? we haven't seen it and the reason we haven't is because they don't want to let it out. >> geraldo: don't touch that dial. i'll be right back with joe and victoria, right after these words. in-wash scent boosters, here with my favorite new intern, jimmy. mmm! fresh! and it's been in the closet for 12 weeks! unbelievable! unstopables! follow jimmy on youtube. unstopables! cheryl burke is cha-cha-ing in depend silhouette briefs for charity, to prove that with soft fabric and waistband, the best protection looks, fits, and feels just like underwear. get a free sample and try for yourself. hoo-hoo...hoo-hoo. hoo-hoo hoo. sir... i'll get it together i promise... heeheehee. jimmy: ronny, how happy are folks who save hundreds of dollars switc

here's what i'd like him to say about benghazi. i'm here by as commander in chief, president of the united states, authorizing every agency of the government who has a survivor or someone who participated in benghazi the ability to come forward and talk to the congress without fear of reprisal. i'm going to turn over to the congress all the relevant documents, all the survivors, all those who participated, and let the chips fall where they may. i wish he would do that. >> sean: i wish he would too. you are working with members of congress for a joint resolution to do what? >> in case he doesn't do that, i'm going to try to challenge our democratic colleagues who have been stonewalling, defending the administration to a fault on benghazi. we'll do a joint resolution of the house and senate, insisting that the administration make available to the congress, the names of the survivors so we can interview them, all the relevant information, and those who participated in benghazi, so we can get to the truth. if you're going to provide to

it is my understanding that we have had nine oversight hearings on the benghazi -- since benghazi, the horrific attacks on september 11, 2012. ike many of my colleagues have expressed of the family, i believe we need to continue to do everything within our power as congress to get to the and thes recommendations that will prevent this from happening again. in addition to our condolences, the things that we need to do most is our jobs, to come up with the recommendations to prevent this. one of the overall conclusions of the accountability review board was just that, "that congress must do its part to meet this challenge and provide necessary resources to the state department to address security risks and meet mission imperatives here co that was -- and meet mission imperatives." it was a direct statement out of the review board recommendation. i think each of you agree that congress must do its part, am i correct? yes or no, real quick. >> yes. , i juststher chairman would hope that after this nine oversight hearings, that we will begin to work on some specific recommendations that we

we've all been through that with benghazi. part of it depends on how much notice you have. >> reporter: a car bomb targeted the french embassy in tripoli. two weeks ago armed militias overtook the ministry. the u.s. britain and france issued a joint warning wednesday to the militias to observe the rule of law. in benghazi today there were two explosions at police stations there. the british embassy issued the following warning, quote, given the security implications of the ongoing political uncertainty, the british embassy is temporarily withdrawing a small number of staff. the president's nominee to replace chris stevens faced questions at her confirmation hearing this week about the deteriorating situation. >> obviously, i think principle goal is to address the security vacuum, to address the capacity vacuum of the government in terms of its security. >> reporter: none of the u.s. military forces in europe have been ordered to move as of this evening. but in the wake of benghazi they can't afford to not put them on alert. >>

benghazi is different. there are facts and they point to misleading the american public for political gain. there is no getting around rice's testimony or the shoddy security in libya. that story benghazi, that's huge. down the road, the irs and the a.p. stories might become nightmares for president obama, best of your recollection again, that has not yet been established. and that's the memo. now for the top story tonight. reaction. joining us from miami, the purveyor of bernard goldberg.com. mr. goldberg. quite a morning for me, bernie. >> yes, it was. let's start out with your chat with stephanopoulos. liberal reporters with a few exceptions have played down the benghazi story. we all know that. they played it down because president obama, their hero, wants it played down. there is a history in the liberal media of playing down stories that he wants played down and playing up stories that he wants played up. that's why during the campaign we heard so much about the war on women. because president obama w

how do they address this benghazi issue? >> i think it's tremendously impactful. what we've seen on benghazi, certainly on capitol hill, is what we've seen on a lot of these polarizing things we've come across in the past four years. first of all you've got two extremities here. you've got folks on one side that want to say -- wan to start talking about impeachment. we need to ask every question and devote every moment to what'sning in benghazi. then you've got folks defending the obama administration saying there's nothing to see here. neither one of those extremities are where you want to be. there's a tremendous number of questions remaining about benghazi that the white house needs to answer, that the state department needs to answer. i think the hearings in the house this week beyond a doubt showed there's still a tremendous number of questions. now you've got the spotlight very squarely on former secretary of state hillary clinton that has lots of political implications, 2016 included. >> hearings, hearings, hearings. it will be interesting to see how the am

consulate in benghazi, u.n. ambassador susan rice said this ... >> what happened initially, it was a spoon taken was reaction to what had just transpired in cairo as a consequence of the video. people gathered outside of the embassy and it grew very violent. >> that moment was from fox news sunday, one of five sunday news shows. she went on to say the attack was not premeditated but it stemmed from protests against that antiislam film. one month later ambassador rice pointed a finger at the intelligence community talking points for the faulty narrative. then by the end of november. 2 1/2 months later ambassador rice met with republican senators and acknowledged there was no protest or demonstration in benghazi. bill: it took weeks for americans to inspect the ruins in benghazi. december 7 the feds questioned a key suspect for three hours. in tunisia with a tunisian judge present. but a month later the feds released that person. robert mueller arrives in libya to meet with senior officials. it wasn't until last w

and after benghazi. and it's an interesting sort of change of tone from the administration o on this, and i think it's not insignificant that they went to her to try to do this. i think they're tryi to take a different tack in the hopes that people will kind of move past in the if they express regret. the problem is there's so much that we still need to know. we still even after going through these e-mails which left in tatters some of the claims of the white house that the white house wasn't involved, the state department wasn't involved, we still don't know who pushed the movie i. how did that become the central part of the administration's story after the attack? it's an important question. there are lots of questions about what happened during the attack too. lou: and if i may, i'm going to use this language, jedediah, the lies aut the amateur movie. that was a campaign of lies directed at the american people. indeed, the world because the president carried it to the general assembly on september 25t

embassy in benghazi under the microscope. >> benghazi. >> benghazi. >> benghazi. >> again, and again and again. >> the republicans and the benghazi tragedy. >> the full scale media campaign to smear public officials. >> i expected a real bombshell. >> i feel like i know what happened in benghazi. >> there was no news today. >> i'm fairly satisfied. >> this has nothing to do with the facts or the truth. >> the search for truth about the benghazi terror attack is now under way. >> that's a tough one because now it is a partisan issue rather than a truth issue. >>> for the first time in about ten years, amanda berry and gina dejesus are resting at their homes tonight. family members of both women spoke to the media and asked for privacy. >> i just want to say we are so happy to have amanda and her daughter home. i want to thank the public and the media for their support and courage over the years. at this time, our family would request privacy so my sister and niece and i can have time to recover. >> i want to thank everybody that believed, even when i said she was alive, and believed.

let's start with benghazi, the document dump. what do you take out of the emails? >> i haven't seen the emails. they had to be released because the pressure is building on multiple fronts. for the first time we're beginning to get information in the white house's involvement in changing the talking points. if i could have answer to one question out of benghazi it would be the following -- who chose susan rice to go out on sunday, the 15th of september, to tell a story so disconnected from reality? >> sean: we'd like to know the answer to that. are you confident that we have all the emails or do more exist? >> there's a lot more emails about how the talking points were manipulated. >> sean: so you think what where got tonight was selected, edited, redacted, this does not in any way tell the true story, because it does reveal that the white house -- by the way, it proves that jay carney is a total propaganda hack liar, that he should not -- he should be fired. that's number one. number two, it also shows that the state department was up to its eyeballs in creating th

but benghazi as an issue is not dying. just today, darrell issa put out requests for sworn depositions of the two men who oversaw that review board. so much more on this to come. >> thank you for your time let's turn to contributor perry bacon, political editor. nice to see you on the show for the first time. >> good to see you, toure. >> we're in a hyper polarized situation. not just d.c. through throughout america. thisage of the turnout election when the two parties barely seem to be speaking the same language. republicans feel like the president is the worst president of all time. when you talk about benghazi, that confirm what they already feel. democrats feel like he is doing just work and republicans are attacking just to be him. so when you have scandals like, this does it really change anything when they confirm the biases they already have? >> i think it does change things. there are people working together. you take an issue where immigration, marco rubio is leading the effort. he is working with a bipartisan gr

coming up, we told you that american lives could have been saved in benghazi. since then, chairman of the joint chiefs of staffs, dempsey, leon panetta and thomas pickering said it couldn't be done. were they lying? we told you months ago that the administration lied and americans died. this week explosive testimony finally blows the whistle on those denials to send help. with me is fox news military analyst, colonel david hunt who joins us from boston and former navy seal christopher who was friends and a seal with ty woods and glenn dougherty. colonel hunt, i'll go to you first. i'm going to assume that the fight began at 9:30 at night in benghazi and lasted eight hours. i want you it assume the official washington response was the assets can't get there in time. what's your reaction to that claim? >> it's preposterous, it's a lie and we had forces within two hours by jet and three hours by air that were in croatia, armed and ready to go. >> how far is croatia from benghazi? how long would that take? >> it would take about three hours. this is a force from in

. >> bret: getting to the bottom of benghazi. one witness prepares to point the finger of blame at hillary clinton. this is "special report." >> bret: good evening. i'm bret baier. although still a day and a half away, wednesday's congressional hearing on the benghazi terror attack is shaping up as a direct assault on the obama administration's handling of the crisis and could reverberate into the next presidential campaign. much of the verbal are a tier larry will be directed at former secretary of state and perspective presidential candidate hillary clinton. chief washington correspondent james rosen tells us what we know right now. >> i directed our response from the state department and state in close contact with officials from across our government. >> in the early hours of the benghazi crisis, a state department whistleblower will soon tell congress secretary clinton and under secretary of state for management kennedy tried to cut the department own department bureau out of the reporting and decision-making. >> what would

>> well, look at this benghazi matter. we all know, even people who are paying half attention, that there were twelve iterations of the talking points. why are the talking points important? because that was the sheet of music the administration was going to sing off of, whether it was in front of congress, whether it was to we, the people, whether it was in any other forum, and it was a flat-out lie. they didn't work at this to try to get the facts straight, they worked at this to try to redact the facts and the facts knew they knew it was an al-qaeda related group that attacked our compound that's correct murdered our ambassador and three other men, and they are still lying about it. obama today is still talking about a video that had absolutely nothing to do with it. so the question is are we going to have a select investigative committee where resources are focused and drag these people through subpoenas, and prosecute them for perjury if they lie or drag the tails on this? >> what would you recommend a select committee

, benghazi, benghazi. it's like beating juice for fox news. if you say it enough times it will appear even though fox news wouldn't be able to find it on a map. joining me now my non-expert panel. joining memanaging director and host of this week in blackness radio twib dot hmelon white. and comedian paul mecurio and dean obeidallah. carney has been caught in a lie. >> still, is there any significance of these new revelations or does carney take the fall for it or does this administration walk through fire. >> most of the changes were coming from the state department not the white house. >> john: the state department and the c.i.a. going back and forth. >> they still told the truth but it was not the truth that they wanted. carney argued that it was more style choices whatever, but the fact is that they, in fact, did not go in there and rip everything apart like the republican want to-- >> john: but mr. carney said it was one detail about what kind of building the attack was waged on and reality it was som

at just the irs and benghazi? surely you can throw a few more stories into the massive conspiracy. mr. beck, show them how it's done. >> i want you to know that the irs story, the benghazi story, and the boston bombings and the, more importantly, the muslim cover-up, the muslim brotherhood cover-up. they're all connected. >> joining us now is democratic congresswoman jan schakowsky of illinois. good afternoon, ma'am. >> good afternoon, martin. thanks for having me. >> it's a pleasure. there had been talk of a possible second chance to pass expanded background checks in part because of the backlash that many republicans were receiving for their no votes, but i guess we may as well forget about gun safety because speaker boehner, "politico" is now totally obsessed with benghazi. >> well, as the american people, a person on the street, what about benghazi? and i think they would be hard pressed to really know where it was, what it was, or that they would care very much. not that it wasn't a tragedy, but this is not t

fort hood, benghazi, cleveland, boston. all these things are about ignoring signs. >> eric: gosnell? >> greg: gosnell. >> dana: who is doing all the ignoring. >> bob: well, the f.b.i. >> dana: you make me think there's something i'm ignoring. >> greg: me. >> dana: well, i've got your number. you know, is there something that i should be seeing so that in hindsight i don't look back and go oh, i wish i would have told be somebody about this. >> bob: somebody should have told the boston police this guy has been investigated an the russians got in touch with the fbi twice about him. >> eric: it comes down to tolerance. that's all it is. people are scared of appearing intolerant so they don't finger anybody. i hate using that phrase. >> andrea: you used it twice in one week. >> greg: where is the body buried? >> andrea: can't tell you. >> bob: so far she wanted to do away with the cleveland guy. arias and who else? >> andrea: not in that order, by the way, too. it would be the tsarnaev brothers first, then the cleveland kidnapp

>> kimberly: so much for benghazi happened a long time ago. jay carney postponed his regular scheduled briefings three hours as he held a discussion with the press corps trying to spin the attack in libya. two days ago we heard explosive testimony from three state department whistleblowers and today jonathan carl obtained 12 different edits to talking points that were the basis for the administration's leading message after four americans were killed by muslim terrorists. what were the edits about? hardly about scrubbing the facts that al-qaeda group was responsible. perhaps it was to protect president obama. carney and the white house have reason to sweat. here is carney's original explanation about edits. >> the white house has made it clear that the single adjustment to those talking points by either of these two institutions was changing the word to conflict because conflict was inaccurate. >> kimberly: here is what he said today. >> the white house as i said made one minor change to the talking points drafted and produced by the c.i.a. ev

you saw jay carney asked 46 times about benghazi friday. it really is disrupting the white house message. the president was trying to talk about health care. i think the republicans, as perry said, they'll keep at it. there could be more hearings. what struck me was the president's relying on some of these very republicans being the most critical, john mccain, marco rubio, rand paul, support his next big agenda, immigration reform. it's on the table now. how much can the white house fight back on these charges on one hand and not offend those they need to work with on the immigrants and the budget on the other hand? >> and the white house has been encouraging cabinet members giving graduation speeches, commencement speeches to push obama care. bloomberg reporting, the white house told all cabinet members and senior officials to use commencement speeches to drive home for graduating students and their parents the benefits they gained from a provision of the law that allows young adults to stay on their family's insurance plan until they turn

and, the president says, there is no there there on benghazi. he labels the renewed scrutiny of administration actions during and after last fall's terror attack a side show. it would appear the president is falling two different playbooks in dealing with these twin sandals. senior political analyst brit hume is here with thoughts on that. brit? >> hi, bret. two methods of dealing with the public relations crises that now beset the obama administration. the president seems to be trying them beth. one is take charge mode in which a leader acknowledges that wrong has been done, says it's unacceptable. pledges to get to the bottom of it and make it public and set it right. this is where the president seemed to be going today varding the irs's targeting of those conservative groups. the other method is duck and cover in which the leader admits no wrongdoing, claims the whole matter is overblown and tries to blame somebody else. this is where the president has gone from the start on benghazi and where he went again today. we learned last week that th

back to benghazi in a moment. an update on cleveland as one of three women freed from this horrifying kidnapping health for ten years finally returned home. it will happen momentarily. gina dejesus was 14 years old when she vanished but as we await a statement. we are wondering we'll get a first look at gina. they have been with police and now returning home where we expect gina's family to speak. momentarily, we don't know whether she is going to be there. we are also learning that that the main suspect was apparently a close family friend. but back to the benghazi hearings in the meantime,. >> it's not considered good news. what did she have to say to you? >> she demanded a report. >> was he is upset about the fact? >> she was upset. >> this baby-sitter, this spy was not allowed to be there. all investigation was not about to be in classified hearing? >> she was very upset. >> so this goes next to secretary clinton, is that accurate. >> mr. chairman, he is guy of 22 years with outstanding service to our country,

and of course, benghazi? >> i think that first of all, the american people expect them to be forth coming on these issues, but secondly, they want to see a countability, and they are not seeing that in the white house hor below on the issues we hear individual who is directing this program with irs has now been transferred over to the new department that will be supervising what some say will be 16,000 or more irs edging check to see any -- agents to see if every american has purchased insurance under obamacare. and whether she had still be employed by irs. lou: let me ask you. directly, we began this broadcast by talking about trust. this administration's credibility, do you as chairman of. >> yochairman. >> do you trust the justice department. we find out now with all that has been revealed about internal revenue service and its little we find out now that woman that led the department during most, is in change of irs affordable care department which will have 16, 5-- 16, 500 agents added to it for the impo

>> benghazi happened a lot time ago. this administration has stone walled every inquiry and delayed the answers and not reased names and told all kinds of story and they are saying it is an old story. i have argued from the beginning, the administration is always stringing it out over time and count on the main stream media being uninterested in the story and that worked up until now . echoes what hillary clinton said in the hearings. what difference does it make at this point? >> if you wait that long, the evidence will fade. but they will not get away with it. i think there are people in the state department that want to testify and now it is out in the open, they are -- at least the accusation is that the administration is threatening them and in cases like that. they will be allowed to testify and as we heard in the reports from adam houseley. there is stuff that happened there that contradicts the official story and that is when the story of the unraveling of this will begin. >> bret: juan. >> i love challenging aut

leaving benghazi aside. the irs is now apologizing for an action it took, deeming it inappropriate, singling out conservative groups and their tax-exempt status. what would prompt that apology? what was discovered where day were more or less caught with the proof they were doing this? they wouldn't just willy nilly come out and volunteer that apology. there's more to this here, and believe me, i'm the sharpest tool in the shed but there's going be something more that would prompt no less than the irs to say, we goofed, we're sorry. that doesn't cover it. nor this whole benghazi mess and imi can mr. egg indication office what the administration said then and now, someone lied. and just give them the basics, you know. i got this. [thinking] is it that time? the son picks up the check? [thinking] i'm still working. he's retired. i hope he's saving. i hope he saved enough. who matters most to you says the most about you. at massmutual we're owned by our policyowners, and they matter most to us. whether you're ju

to cross-talk the benghazi affair i'm joined by raymond tanter unwashed. and he is the president of the iran policy committee and author of the upcoming book arab rebels in iranian dissidents also in washington we have raymond mcgovern he is co-founder of veteran intelligence professionals for sanity and in atlanta we cross to jay bookman he's a columnist and blogger at the atlanta journal constitution all right gentlemen crosstalk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want if i go to you first in washington is this a scandal or just incompetence or both. well the scandal is all out of proportion and what needs to happen is adults need to look at the situation and determine number one what happened number two why it happened and i'm not talking about additional security measures and three can it happen again and will it be able to be prevented and the answer to that last one key one is no it cannot be prevented because the reason why it happened is not a lack of security measures but it has to do with u.s. policy with that part of the worl