google or the government? >> google. the national security agency is focused by law outside of the united states. if an american knew that literally someone knew every place they went, everybody they were talking to, where, when, and however, they would freak out. >> and yet that's happened. >> that's happening. >> reporter: google is not unique in the quest for personal information. facebook has been accused in several lawsuits with tracking its users everywhere else they visit on line. facebook has denied that. at amazon.com the computers report not just what you purchase but everything you shop for to analyze what you might want next. google would not comment on the lawsuit brent scott has joined but said in statement that gee mails are only tracked by computer software. no humans read your e-mail or account information, the company says, in order to show you advertisements. no one is accusing google of using its massive data file zents anyone except to send them ads burke when it comes to sending raw and personal inf

google is interested in getting the engagement from the users, it's different from the way you use google maps on the phone. google wants you to love the products and use the products so they can advertise to you. when you talk mobile tiezment, you want location, and it knows where you are and what age you are and gender you are, it can target you effectively. >> what is the user experience like on the different applications. for example, what does finding the nyse look like on ways for example or on google maps or apple maps? >> the thing that sets ways apart, i it's friendly. you know, when you send a report, you get points. it lks like a game. your icon is a cute cloud looking guy, and that is a lot different from the stark kind of bland drop lets you see on google and apple maps. when you are navigating toward the nys evee, for example, it w show you a path in a 3-3-d perspecti perspepective. >> and the drivers talk to each other, and the data is creating a whole registerry. >> because basicly if i'm google and i see that you are talking to my application, i know you are engaged and i

> google without question. >> reporter: google without question and it's not close? >> it's not even close. the national security agency is focused by law outside of the united states. if an american knew that literally someone knew every place they went, everybody they were talking to, where, when and however, they would freak out. >> reporter: and yet that's happened. >> that's happening. >> reporter: google is not unique in the quest for personal information. facebook has been accused in several lawsuits with tracking its users everywhere else they visit online. facebook has denied that. at amazon.com, the computers record not just what you purchase but everything you shop for to analyze what you might want next. google would not comment on the lawsuit brent scott has joined but said in a statement that g- mails are only tracked by computer software. no humans read your email or google account information, the company says, in order to show you advertisements. no one is accusing google of ever using its massive data files against anyone except to send them ads. bu

you use google maps. google wantsñrzou to love its products so they can advertise o you, and talking about mobile advertisement, the big deal you want identity and you want location, because if it knows who you are, how old you are, what gender you are, and where you are, it can target effectively. >> that's the user experience like on these different applications? for example, the new york stock change city corner of wall street and broad. what does finding the nysc look for on google maps and appear -- apple maps. >> when you send a report, you get points. your icon has a cute little cloud looking guy and that's different from the stark utilitarian droplets you see on google maps and apple maps. when you're navigating towards the nysc, for example, it will show you more of a 3d perfect. >> the drivers talk to each other, and that data is all very important information, and it's creating a whole registry. >> yeah. basically if i'm google and i see you're actually talking to my application, i know you're

the nsa or google? >> google, without question. >> and it's not close? >> it's not even close. the nsa is fox ed by -- focused by law, outside of the united states. if an american knew that literally someone knew every place they went, everybody they were talking to, where, when, and however, they would freak out. >> and yet that's happened. >> that's happening . >> reporter: google is not unique. facebook has been accused in several lawsuits with tracking its users everywhere else they visit online. facebook denies that. at amazon, the computers record what you purchase and everything you shop for to analyze what you might want next. google would not comment on the lawsuit scott has joined but said that gmails are only tracked by computer software. no humans read your e-mail or google account information in order to show you advertisements. >> reporter: no one is accusing google of using trs data files -- using its data files against one. but when it comes to intimate information, private industry is miles ahead of the government and does not need a warrant. >> this is not the

google is outperforming today. it has outperformed, in fact, for years, and for the most recent year, over apple. it's another smart way it is outflanking apple. what are they focusing on with the acquisition? they're focusing on mobile. when we look globally, android has become the standard. increasingly, google owns the international smartphone market. this is part of that strategy, maps in general are part of that strategy. i see much higher prices ahead for google. >> so you guys have nothing to disagree on. >> that's right. >> unless you saw the movie, carter, and you liked it. >> i like those two actors. i haven't seen the movie. while it is up a lot more in the market, 25% versus 14%, 15%, it was a stock that was stuck, range-bound for two, three years. so this recent advance is a catch-up, and we think, again, just as steve said, plenty more to come. >> you know, bill, also, just to tie it into today's news, we're talking a lot about the nsa. if you want to talk about somebody who knows a lot about us, forg

what i hate about google, if i google myself, type in greg gutfeld is a -- this is what comes up. greg gutfeld is an idiot, greg gutfeld is not funny, followed by greg gutfeld is a jerk, followed by greg gutfeld is a moron, greg gutfeld is a tool. >> i think greg gutfeld needs to read the fourth amendment. >> i want to make a point. technology is a faster runner than society. this is inevitable, we are catching up. technology is hussein bolt, society is bob beckel. the fact is, we can't go back. we love the internet, love paying our bills online, like having our information out there. we have to figure out what are we going to do next. we haven't had that conversation. >> bob? >> well, i appreciate the analogy. i can't run five feet. seems to me they have been doing it for years for marketing purposes, only recently the government has gotten into it, urged them to help them with various parts of national intelligence programs. the the question is, should google have the right or should at least the courts approve google using private information secured by american people and givi

google is interested in getting the engagement from the users, it's different from the way you use google maps on the phone. google wants you to love the products and use the products so they can advertise to you. when you talk mobile tiezment, you want location, and it knows where you are and what age you are and gender you are, it can target you effectively. >> what is the user experience like on the different applications. for example, what does finding the nyse look like on ways for example or on google maps or apple maps? >> the thing that sets ways apart, it's friendly. you know, when you send a report, you get points. it looks like a game. your icon is a cute cloud looking guy, and that is a lot different from the stark kind of bland drop lets you see on google and apple maps. when you are navigating toward the nys evee, for example, it w show you a path in a 3-d perspecti perspective. >> and the drivers talk to each other, and the data is creating a whole registerry. >> because basically if i'm google and i see that you are talking to my application, i know you are engaged and i k

now the only way you can see porn on google is by typing porn into google. (laughter) or, or really anything into google. it's just not good business. i mean google is making a car that can drive itself. why have a car you don't need to steer if you can't watch porn while it drives you to church. now what are you supposed to do with your hands in there. i'm telling you, i am telling you, those heated leather seats are just a tease. next up on the-- i love westerns, the classic american genre which is why i'm giving a wag of my finger at the lone ranger. jimmy, give them a good taste of the bad ugly. >> there were rumors that sustained us, stories of a man, a masked man. a lone ranger. >> stephen: yes, the lone ranger facing off against his newest threat, a bullet gently lobbed at him by a child. (laughter) i'm sorry, i am sorry but i cannot get behind this gritty new reboot. i'm an originalist and i believe the lone ranger should be a clean cut gentleman with a perfectly crisp lace up shirt because back in my day outlaws knew not to [bleep] with a guy wearin

i don't see google as evil. i don't see google as threatening. i think they have been caught in what i call a modern realty, which is this, there is no privacy on-line. got it? you've known? we gave people a sticker and had them show us. we learned a lot of us have known someone who's lived well into their 90s. and that's a gat thing. but even though we're living longer, one thing that hasn't changed much is the official retirement age. ♪ the question is how do you make sure you have the money you need to enjoy all of these years. ♪ to enjoy all of these years. if you've got it, you know how hard it can be to breathe and man, you know how that feels. copd includes emphysema and chronic bronchitis. spiriva is a once-daily inhaled copd maintenance treatment that hps open my obstructed airways for a full 24 hours. you know, spiriva helps me breathe easier. spiriva handihaler tiotropium bromide inhalation powder does noteplace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms. tell your doctor if you have kidney problems, glaucoma, trouble urinating, or a

star in what should i do with my google trade? >> all right, let's see if we can answer than carter is not here, he's no hollywood trying to cut his next deal, but sent a postcard detailing it. hello from beautiful los angeles, it doesn't get much better than google, it's hanging in like a champ compared to equities and other technology stocks. to wit, it's outperformed the s&p to month, year and date, stay long. hugs and air kisses. now we know what he's doing, mike? >> the reason we put it on is the market had a big rip, this was trading at all-time highs, and looking to press a bullish bet. stay in the trade, the stock is holding in there, you still have time to pan out, and we haven't risked that much. certainly not relative to purchasing the shares. i would look at this as the way to play it. >> didn't risk that much. and i like the 940 stripe, 920 is the 52-week high, if you expect that level by a reasonable amount, you're happy to sell the 940 strike. >> let's go to your trade with the update? >> i'm going to stay in. the i

this weekend, fox opens up "the internship" in 3,000 theaters. >> google. >> you got us a job at google? >> reporter: fox's comedy follows vince vaughn and owen wilson. though fox is tapping into this media, the studio and companies took opposite approaches. sony didn't get any cooperation from facebook. fox and google went in the opposite direction. the internship paints the search giant as fun and quirky. they consulted on accuracy, provided 100 extras, including co-pounder and suggested changes. it sounds like the mother of all product placement, but no money changed hands. google said it participated because it wanted to get kids more excited about technology. now it could benefit from a surge in job and internship applications. google's image list comes at a key time as competition heats up with other companies. >> it can be a very new way of looking at google, and to the company that could definitely help them, especially in the talents that these companies are running against each other. >> reporter: now a sea of bedding on google's brand pays off for fox, who spent $58 million t

google, facebook, microsoft and twitter. they're all urging the nsa to disclose the secret number and scope of the agency's data requests. but is there really any chance the nsa will declassify secret material? i say no. but it is a clever attempt by these big tech companies to cover their backs. let's get some expert opinion on this. we have google's former director of u.s. public policy. that's alan davidson. he's now a visiting scholar at m.i.t. and we welcome back former u.s. attorney joe digeneva. joining me on set, michael favre, favre miller and washington and "forbes" executive editor michael ozanian. alan davidson, thank you for joining me. joe digenova may cut my nosa, but i can't imagine the fisa court declassifying secret stuff to help google and apple and microsoft. i can't believe that. >> it's not just about helping google and microsoft and facebook. it's about helping people work through this process and ultimately do something useful for the nsa because the risk here is that we are doing something very bad f

it does the little tiny of the corner of the market google will have an effect on monopoly. the public in a fit of having the contents of seven major university libraries available to people around the world, many often free to public library terminals it seems to me to overwhelm this minor concern that the justice department objected. and that is sort of typical of what seems to be happening in that even when the people within the ecosystem can work out their differences, somebody else intervenes and you know everything is up for grabs. so google and the authors guild for example reached an amicable solution along with the publishers. we all figured we would work something out that was in the best interest of readers first of all and the world of knowledge. has worked for google, worked for the authors, works for the publishers and the justice department says no. so that's difficult. >> host: your new novel "identical," what kind of copyright protection will you have or do you have on this book right now? >> guest: while -- >> host: how long will it last? >> guest: as you m

this weekend, fox opens up "the internship" in 3,000 theaters. >> google. >> you got us a job at google? >> reporter: fox's comedy follows vince vaughn and owen wilson. though fox is tapping into this media, the studio and companies took opposite approaches. sony didn't get any cooperation from facebook. fox and google went in the opposi direction. the internship paints the search giant as fun and quirky. they consulted on accuracy, provided 100 extras, including co-pounder and suggested changes. it sounds like the mother of all product placement, but no money changed hands. google said it participated because it wanted to get kids more excited about technology. now it could benefit from a surge in job and internship applications. google's image list comes at a key time as competition heats up with other companies. >> it can be a very new way of looking at google, and to the company that could definitely help them, especially in the talents that these companies are running against each other. >> reporter: now a sea of bedding on google's brand pays off for fox, who spent $58 million to

what do you make of this and whether google can press the point? >> we all have a right to free speech in this country. when the government wants to take away that right and the gag people like google or anyone else in the country, and has testified that. in a unique position to shed light on the debate is a good for step they want to publish information about how many users have been swept up in some of the surveillanceeorders. the toe area members of the stickers that they get is information that they need, but also could be trying to publish information about the types of orders that they're getting and whether the orders are getting the dragnet type like the one that we saw directed at verizon. neil: that is what worries me. that is what worries me. i know a lot of people say, those orders, it's a big deal, trying to get some bad guys and all that. i think it is a bit of up argument myself, but leaving that aside to my worry about whether they're not even orders. when the government comes knocking in any entity through a fisa order or a judge w

also, we want to hear from you, can a company like google in the center of it, can google outsmart the government when it comes to accessing your data? who is smarter, the private sector or the public sector? your answers coming up. [ indistinct shouting ] ♪ [ indistinct shouting ] [ male announcer ] time and sales data. split-second stats. [ indistinct shouting ] ♪ it's so close to the options floor... [ indistinct shouting, bell dinging ] ...you'll bust your brain box. ♪ all onnkorswim from td eritrade. ♪ from td eritrade. and you wouldn't have it any other way.e. but your erectile dysfunction - yoknow, that could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. yoknow, that could be a question of blood flow. you can be more confidt in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bp like needing to go frequent or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do n

so critics accuse google enabling spying because of their technogy. is google good or evil? remember tat is their motto, don't be evil. with m a privacy and security researcher and stephen hayes from theweekly standard." thks so both of you for joining us. steve, i want t start with you because google is trying to get out there in front of this story. they have put out a public letter to general general asking if theydattorneyeneral eric holder to publish the transparencyeport wch is supposed to show how many times they refused the government whe the government asked to see the users data. is that compelling or convincing? will it do anything? >> it could google is showing the sco of their involvement in this. by accounts we hea frome lawys ad pple ie ske to, unow,merins wil kely be surisedhat t is notroad. t th is theas tt ogleants t ma a wts toakeliy ritnow use there is sense, there is peeption, i think i it's a misperception that you basical to the the government tacked into theervers ofou know, google and all these other tech companies when that is not i fact what was ha

. >> google members getting directions from the f.b.i. find out what a judge is saying about those demands. and a live report out of oklahoma where a new round of tornadoes killed five people and left a new trail of damage. >>> new at 11:00 tonight, angry, loud and raucous. accused of treason, packed a public meeting organizers changed their mind in names the grand marshal of pride week. nbc bay area attending that very intense meeting. is there a chance he's going to be named grand marshal? >> jessica, that remains to be seen. the board said they'd have a decision within seven days and that promise came only after a three-hour meeting that really fell apart after the second hour. >> folks? folks? >> the forum escalated into a shouting match after a member of the public called the president of sf pride a murderer and some of the board members shouted back. though tempers flared, it did not get physical. >> free bradly manning! >> a crowd made up almost entirely of bradly manning supporters demanded that the board reverse a decision. >> yo

some critics accuse google enabling spying because of their technology. is google good or evil? remember that is their motto, don't be evil. with me, a privacy and security researcher and stephen hayes from the "weekly standard." thanks so both of you for joining us. steve, i want to start with you because google is trying to get out there in front of this story. they have put out a public letter to general general asking if theydattorney general eric holder to publish the transparency report which is supposed to show how many times they refused the government when the government asked to see the users data. is that compelling or convincing? will it do anything? >> it could. google is showing the scope of their involvement in this. by accounts we heard from google lawyers and people i've spoken to, you know, americans will likely be surprised that it is not broader. i think that is the case that google wants to make and wants to make publicly right now because there is sense, there is perception, i think it's a misperception that you basically to the the government tacked into t

type that into google. i know don't like google. >> it's not they don't like it. but the reverse tone thing is good. >> yes. it is really important. >> if they have a no identification i.d. they're blocking it -- >> yeah. sometimes they won't give a phone number. an e-mail address only. that's a big sign. don't pay with cash. never just wire money to something like this. >> the exact opposite of everything my father taught me! >> sometimes people go on vacation, they like to post photos, we're enjoying the bahamas, having fun at the cape -- >> wait until you get home. >> yes! you're basically saying please rob my house. >> they don't know if somebody's staying at your house while you're gone or you have adt. >> that's true but it is worth taking a shot. >> a lot of people like to be on the do-not-call registry but sometimes that's a trap too. >> criminals have started this lately, they'll call you up and say we'll help you get on the do not call list or we'll update your information. they pretend they're with the government. to do this we need your name, address a

what do you make of this and whether google can press the point? >> we all have a right to free speech in this country. when the government wants to take ay that right and the gag people like google or anyone else in the country, and has testified that. in a unique position to shed light on theebate is a good for sp they want to publish information about how my users have bee swept up in some of the surveillanceeorders. the toe area members ofhe stickers that they get i information that they need, but also could be trying t publish information about the types of orders that they're getting and whether the orders are getting the dragnet type like the one that we saw directed at verizon. neil: that is what worries me. that is what worries me. i know a lot of people say, those orders, it's a big deal, trying to get some bad gs and all that. i think it is a bit of up argument myself, but leaving that aside to my worry about whether they're not even orders. when the government comes knocng in any entity through a fisa order or a judge with a piece of pa

with google you're going to use g-mail, google search, the desires you want to look for. if you don't trust them, good luck using the internet. i think you have to, you know, go town the point of -- >> if you use internet, you have to trust somebody. >> that's right. the second you turn on your phone and check e-mail you're giving away your information is there any way? once you go online, there's no way to totally protect it, is there? >> here's the thing. you have to go to brands you trust. google is out there. they're upset about this nsa disclosure. they're asking the government, you know, can we talk about how often you talk to us because they -- it's important for them to show consumers that they're a trustworthy brand. facebook is the same way. tumbler is the same way. >> what does google do with all this information? >> google uses it to make better products. i mean that's a big thing. privacy is a trade-off. google now is this really cool product where if you say order something off of amazon.com you'll get a tracking order in your e-mail and google will monitor

we have a newly minted google intern. we profiled his experience for business insider and also with us, a returnship at a smaller start-up. for those of you who don't know what that is, sit is a mid-carer unpaid internship. you just finished your google internship. what was the best part of it. >> brilliant android developers and designers. getting a chance to work with them and collaborate with them day to day was rewarding. >> how was the food? >> oh, well, i'm a vegetarian and usually it's very difficult for me to find a good healthy diet but at google you had a variety of cuisines. latin american, mexican. pizza and burger. it was never difficult to find food. if i ever felt too unfit or bloated, i could go to the gym. google promotes a healthy behavior. >> it's evidently a nice place to work and no wonder vince vaughn and owen wilson want that internship. i gather that the process of securing a google internship can be very involved. describe it. >> yes, actually, i interviewed for a full-time position when i was a c

movie is about two middle-aged guys that become summer interns at google. in real life, they be making more money than you do. they earn as much as $20,000 for the summer. that works out to $6700 each month. speaking of google, tech giant is taking a closer look how we use our smart phones when not shopping. jonathan bloom explains, google is telling retailers they better make fast friends with their phones. >> smartphones are already with us. in a conference room, a google research team explained we don't put our phones away because we are shopping. new study shows quite the opposite. >> it's just about everyone. they are using to help shop. >> comparing prices and getting directions to a competitor's store. there was out cry about showroomers that would play with products at one store and checking important prices online. >> these are people playing angry birds, but these are people using their phones to explicitly help them. >> they were shopping with our phones in hand whether the companies like it or not. it may help retailers. >> we found that more mo

google and facebook, for example, they say that they're protecting our information. that's our expectation, you know. and so if they didn't know that the government was somehow gathering this information, then that looks bad for them because, you know, what -- they're not protecting the information. >> so there's an important distinction in these two programs that have been disclosed so far. i get the feeling this may be more disclosures the next week or two. they're coming fast expeand fur. the call order requiring verizon to turn over all of its calling records includes domestic calling record. so not the contents of calls but who called whom and for how long and how often. the thing involving the internet companies, they say that the government says that they're aiming for foreign intelligence. so there's a much lower threshold. if you want to collect information about people not in the u.s., people not u.s. people, it's a lot easier. it's easier for them to do. but that doesn't help facebook and google when they're trying to expand overseas because -- they're bei

. >>> and google, last trade on google is up about a third of a percent to $879.90. the search giant is developing a video game console and also a wrist watch based on its android operating system. that's according to the "wall street journal." ty? >> thank you very much, sue. rupert murdoch is splitting his media empire into two companies, and that happens after the bell today. news corp. and 21st century fox. which of the two are analysts more bullish on? the electronics side of the business or the paper, print side of the business? as we go to the break, a look at the best performing sector in the first half of the year. it is health care, there you see it. first half of the year, up 21%. we'll be back after this. ttrade, in-branch seminars... plus, their live webinars. i use daily market commentary to improve my strategy. and my local scottrade office guides my learning every step of the way. because they know i don't trade like everybody. i trade like me. i'm with scottrade. (announcer) scottrade... ranked "highest in customer loyalty for brokerage and investmen

neil: you mentioned go google, i just get a sense of google they are more interested in showing their backbone with the chinese, for exampleyou can't get this information. washington asks for the same thing, whatever yo want. that is weird, perverse high-tech double standard i a seeing, it kd of bothers me. >> well, i think thatll of the tech companies wanto show a backbone efficient their customer. neil: but affer the fact. i can threa to beat you up after you left the room. >> and you make a good point. that this has been going on for a while. the oy reason that we're all talking about it is because of the whistle-blor, you have to woer why done the companies ask for more transparency earlier. >> remember they are saying it is contained. not everything, it is specific stuff. >> that is -- >> i think only reason why they are doi this because it is publicized. >> you are thinking t worst, lance is thinking of worst, i am thinking the worst. i'm not using google for that any more. neil: really. >> true. >> i'midding, but you know what i'm saying. neil: i did, i do, i don't kno >> i can

with google you would be paying 25 times to get 17%. the relative trade looks much better. >> google is right there at the forefront of innovation and making great strides. when you get that big, when you get that successful, the regulators come sniffing. i think they are increasingly sniffing around google. are the regular lay dtors goinga downfall? >> the concern i think was greater a year ago. so far no one has really been able to get him anything. the contracts that they have had with the doj and with the eu comes the commission have been basically nothing. they have really gotten by that. by the end of the day, let the market decide. google was exceptionally innovative. we care about that translating into earnings growth. i don't think that 12% is really all that innovative. >> dan, thank you so much for joining us. >> thank you for having me. >> put that nasty robe on and go downstairs yourself. because a big new york hotel is saying no more room service. >> and don't steal the robe either. they charge you for that. and nearly dou

for google it's a gamble. if it succeeds made in america is a major selling point for a cutting-edge phone. if it fails, american dreams and real american jobs are at stake. >> certainly, it will boost moral. a lot of people for a long time were kind of economic determining, they assumed that our jobs particular our low-skill jobs would go abroad to the lowest waged countries, and that was never wholly the case, but when manufacturing does start coming back, people's hopes will get up. >> reporter: flex tronics will build the mac pro and the x phone. why make them in the u.s. the cost of labor is raising in china and malaysia for one and when there is a brand-new product there needs attention, sometimes it worth having it crafted close to home. >> we're seeing work move into texas where we put up the factory and north carolina, south carolina, these places the governments are aggressive at improving regulation so it's pro-business and keeping taxes down and working to stimulate jobs. >> it will probably take y

me to google, all of our conversations were about what google was doing in the world. >> started about you -- one of the simple secrets of many people is give ammunition to change the world and they will work for you hard. >> that's right. when eric and i were at google just been they just been announced as chairman. you were about to be ceo, but the world did not know that. eric gets a look at what google is doing in the world. my greatest hope for "lean in" is not about get my hope is all all those women who got races and the daughters whose fathers have monthly meeting to get them self-confidence to believe they can do anything. >> would you have the same success with women mentors than you've had no mentors? how do you make yourself available and will you be my mentor? [laughter] >> said this person has not read the book yet i see one of the worst question to ask a stranger is will you be my mentor? is interesting. i've only worked for men. about a couple female mentors because i worked for men. one of the points and make it that when the line only women to mentor women, will never

google and facebook, for example, they say that they're protecting our information. that's our expectation, you know. and so if they didn't know that the government was somehow gathering this information, then that looks bad for them because, you know, what -- they're not protecting the information. >> so there's an important distinction in these two programs that have been disclosed so far. i get the feeling this may be more disclosures the next week or two. they're coming fast expeand fur. the call order requiring verizon to turn over all of its calling records includes domestic calling record. so not the contents of calls but who called whom and for how long and how often. the thing involving the internet companies, they say that the government says that they're aiming for foreign intelligence. so there's a much lower threshold. if you want to collect information about people not in the u.s., people not u.s. people, it's a lot easr. it's easier for them to do. but that doesn't help facebook and google when they're trying to expand overseas because -- they're being

you have got an individual brent scott suing google because he doesn't like google scanning his personal e-mails so they can target commercials and ads. then i have eric schmidt closely aligned with the obama reelection campaign. the image of google is on the attack and they are fighting back. they said to the government you tell the world it was you who forced us to divulge private information. so they are fighting back. because their image is clearly at stake. martha: their brand and credibility are everything. the ability to search on google, everybody who touches the internet comes across. it has absolutely made every one of us in this country think about the searches that you do and the things you wanted to buy. all of this is getting trapped somewhere. they will have to fight back pretty hard. >> they are under threat in three different directions here. but image is everything. hard to get it back. martha: they want the government to stick up for them. tell them we didn't give everybody's information. very interesting ties with the administration and eric schmidt as well. well see

i'm not using google for that any more. neil: really. >> true. >> i'm kidding, but you know what i'm saying. neil: i did, i do, i don't know. >> i can't reach you on e-mail. now not going to ill, he is off of the net. neil: i don't know, it is a mess, i appreciate you trying to sort it out, misirabily, i might point out. >> thank you. neil: do you wonder how we get to bottom of government scandals, when the government fires the very one reveals the scandals. first to report potential security breaches on sec computers that contain crucial stock exchange data, but web was was fired for becoming a nuisance, until confounding facts of the case came out, and sec set eled wit settled with h. weber to tell us how difficult that whistle-blower role can be, david, thank you, i cannot imagine, have you this stuff in front of you, you take it to those who you think want to hear it then you are a villain? >> to begin at the beginning, thank you. secondly, no. whether i learned what i learned, i knew i was going to be fired the day tha

google is coming out with their new google glass which is life with subtitles as they imagine it. with your camera and your recorder. and we actually already have the memory capability now that not only is google take a picture but google record my every waking moment, everything i see. and i'm wondering if we as people are going to put up with any time we step out on the street that every action, every word we say in public may be recorded for all times. may not ever get looked up. but now every gaffe, every stupid thing you do, is now recorded. and i'm just wondering what your thoughts are if we're going to be able to put up with that. >> thanks. the question related to the new google glasses product. and what your thoughts are on the ramifications of a product of that nature. >> well, i'm fascinated by google glasses. i can't wait to get a crack at it myself. i think it's one of those products where you can't really imagine now the uses to which it will be put. the practical experience i have with this is that i interviewed a guy who has been using a version of google glasses f

it was google's first u.s. broadcast interview since the news broke. >> brown: david drummond, welcome. in your letter to the attorney general you appear to acknowledge that google does comply with government requests for user data, so that is in fact the case? >> yes, yes, that's the case. we sent that letter because there's been a serious misimpression that's been created in the wake of the store he-- stories that came out in the last few days, stories that we were as shocked by as everyone else. and the misimpression is that we're doing some kind of large scale or participating in a program that does large scale surveillance on our users. and that's just not the case. and we want to be able to be more transparent about what we do do which is occasionally comply with national security orders as were required to do. what we would like the government to do is to allow us to say more. >> brown: there seems to be a distinction between direct and indirect access to data. what exactly is the government allowed to l

google speaking out again to save its reputation in the pr image a little bit. they are asking the court to share information about the public so they can and we can understand the scope of the information it gave up to the nsa. they want to differentiate between criminal data and surveillance national security data that makes the public feel a little more comfortable here. they are one of nine companies giving up this information. >> also this morning we have a list of the topicup trucks. >> we do. these are the topic tup trucks under 3545,000 dollars topping t -- under 45,000 dollars. the ford f150 coming in second place the ram slt and gmc sierra 1500. >> on to golf this morning phil mickelson keeps coming in second. he did it again this week or i guess last weekend. i hear this is good news for him in sports. >> sometimes coming in second pays off in the end. the fact that he came in second we broke down the numbers for how much he could save the answer is 400,000 dollars on taxes because california has the highest income tax in the nation over 13 percent. t