and i am a legal resident and i have all of the documentation to prove that i don't think that this is the venue which i will choose to do that. the tax records also quote three unit and in fact, when we were a realty was selling the building, i will just stop there, i think that the record... well, i think that the record will show and i am going to ask that you not allow those who choose to declare units that are legal to be illegal, act on their own without working with the planning department. and remove legal tenants like myself, and learn in the unit and appropriately and the sellbility on the second and third or fourth of june as a single family dwelling. now. >> you are out of town. >> let the record speak. >> thank you very much. >> >> is there any other public comment? please step forward. >> my name is john (inaudible) and i live at 2829 baker's street. my property i share a yard with mr. shlarps property. and i have a couple of concerns, i mean, like some of the other people that have spoken, i am sort of beside myself here, because we all rely on 3 r reports on what the bu

should it be legal? should it be taxed? is it a gateway drug that leads to addiction. >> without question, i think legalizing marijuana would be a huge mistake. >> taking you to the front lines of the battle, the beverly hills woman that said lighting up makes them better moms. >> i feel like i'm more interactive with my children. >> and i ask dr. sanjay gupta how dangerous is it really? >> every 19 minutes someone dies of prescription drug overdose but doesn't happen with marijuana. >> and what really happens inside a medical dispensary. >> the clinic is run like a typical health clinic. it's beautiful inside. >> this is the special report gone to pot, america's marijuana obsession. >>> good evening. the fight over pot grows, so does the use. recently washington d.c. opened the first medical marijuana dispensary, with other states that legalized it more medical uses. should it be a crime? we'll take a closer look tonight. >>> also, dr. sanjay gupta's startling one-year investigation on pot. what he found will astound you.

>> what we do is legal in the state of california. of course, federally, it is still 100% prohibited. hi. >> hello. >> in the delivery, i.d.s examine and checked with the same thoroughness as if at the dispensary. >> okay. there is $53. >> and because of the crackdowns on banks and credit card companies with the dispensaries all of the harborside transactions are conducted in cash. why is marijuana such a important part of your life? >> i have a history of being underweight. i go down to 80 pounds which is not good. but if i will smoke a little before each meal, i find that i can eat more. >> what happened to the foot? sh. >> this is the purpose why you are over here visiting myself today. >> what happened? >> i broke my ankle. >> gabrielle is a care giver for her husband, a veteran who did three tours of duty and currently struggles with post-traumatic stress disorder. >> how long has your husband been on medical marijuana now? >> three years. >> how was it before? >> oh, that was not a pretty picture. because we have to give him med

pot leaving both states in legal limbo. meanwhile a spike in drug crimes across the border has sparked mexico's legalization movement. vicente fox called the war on drugs a total failure. pressing president obama not to say no just for the sake of saying no. joining me now is the editor-in-chief of high times chris simenac. >> were you surprised -- >> it is surprising when someone that big does a mea culpa, but considering the violence that ensued in the wake of his presidency presidency under the called roan administration. i'm not surprised at all. you're talking about 80,000 people dead in a war that, you know, when you militarize prohibition, it explodes. and i think that's what you're seeing there is the absolute worst side of prohibition. >> at one point in the interview, he says he want to shift this interview from criminals to -- i think most people who are in favor of legalization understand that the tax implication is part of it. but criminals becoming businessmen. a lot of these drug cartel lords are incredibly v

welcome to the "legal view" where we dig into the top legal stories and the top news stories, as well. and here's where we begin -- olympian oscar pistorius has officially now, officially been indicted for murder. he was in court today on what would have been the 30th birthday of his girlfriend and victim, reeva steenkamp. look at the crush of the press. that may be the story itself. the remarkable circus around pistorius as he left the courtroom this morning. now he admits that he killed her but says it was an accident. cnn has more live from pretoria, south africa. among the crush of journalists covering the story, robin, the significance of today because we already knew he'd be facing the charges, what did today mean in south african law, robin? >> reporter: well, besides that circus which i think is going to continue throughout this trial, there's intense, you know, media and public interest. and of course the oscar pistorius drama. what was very key about today was that essentially the state's case was laid out. what is really important is that they decided to stick with that cha

should it be legal or not? joining us is dr. sanjay gupta and howard samuels. we spoke before about this. you feel very strongly from your own experiences as a personal addict and treating other addicts that it's a real gateway drug, marijuana and we should not be encouraging it to be legaliz legalized. >> well, absolutely. i mean, i think that the doctor has a very good point that for medical purposes, marijuana can be very, very useful. but you have to understand, the vast majority of people that use weed use it to get loaded. they use it to get high. and look, i'm not here to say that it's, you know, worse than alcohol. of course, it's not worse than alcohol but why in the world would we legalize another drug so the nation's youth have another substance to abuse and medicate their feelings with? you know, this is to me, the issue. we don't want to go from one extreme reefer madness, which we know is a total exaggeration, but we don't want to go to the other extreme where we legalize this drug and endanger so many young people. we want to find a healthy balan

has no legal grounds to object to this now if the u.s. nonetheless wants to jeopardize its very important relationship with russia because russia has done something which it is legally fully entitle to do that is a decision for the u.s. but many people will i think feel that if the u.s. does that then the u.s. frankly is behaving in a very strange and self destructive way what about the fate of snowden's father whistleblower manning he's been charged for espionage but could perhaps load if he is brought to trial face the charges of aiding the enemy and in effect be facing a far stiffer sentence and worse predicament than the manning. i don't think so the charges which have been brought against snowden are charges under the espionage act. the united states has not gone so far with snowden as to allege that he's actually helped the enemy of course were he to go to the united states one just doesn't know what might happen but at the moment the charges against noton are under the espionage act and for theft three charges under the espionage a

is it still legal? >> looking at the legal framework of any action you have to keep in mind these actions are only accepted by the international community as a measurement of law. what is necessary and appropriate are the circumstances. one aim is obvious. to stop the crime against humanity. not to punish. there are other ways for punishment. therefore any action should be measured against this limited aim. let me continue with four more points. >> if you have one pertinent points, i have a question. >> the limits his sovereignty independence, integrity, the open question is regime change. >> that is the question. patricia lalonde, how do you draw the line? when do you know you are going from punishing to all of a sudden toppling bashar al-assad and trying to change the regime? >> yes, i think the red line is when we know exactly what happens with his arms. things are changing every day. we have to know who is the enemy. to me it is not bashar al-assad. the enemy is al qaeda. i think sometimes al qaeda

>> why don't you, why don't you talk to my legal counsel? >> so you're saying there is no possibility at all of speaking with anyone from legal counsel? >> no... >> following the secretary-general's advice, i did put several calls in but was told the un's legal counsel was unavailable for comment. >> so we've spotted the secretary-general again in this room and we're going to try to catch him when he comes out. >> secretary, we haven't been given access to the office of legal counsel. you said we could get access to the... >> speak to my legal counsel. >> well we've just been told that the media office has said that they don't actually want us back in the building at all because of displeasure at the fact we've been asking questions to officials in the hallways. they've said that we're effectively banned from filming in the united nations complex. >> on an intellectual level, the un's rejection of our claims was expected. but on an emotional level, the un's rejection was still very hard to take because you're left thinking about people in bo

now, what does it mean on the legal side? i actually think the idea of free will or what is often referred to as volitional control plays a very big part in legal systems, but i think in the legal systems, we don't mean it empirically. we don't mean it as a factual construct. we don't mean that there is actual an idea that someone has free will and has made a conscious choice and that we can somehow measure it. i think that in the criminal law, what we mean by free will is essentially a conclusion. it's not a premise, it is a conclusion. we have concluded that the person should have and will take responsibility for their action and therefore they had free will and they're going to take the consequences for that. the problem is when we start actually believing the rhetoric, we actually start believing what we're saying, if you think that, if you use free will normatively, used as a value judgment about when somebody should have to take responsibility and you use it that way in the criminal law, what happens is it starts bleedi

"legally blond 2" is not a movie about a real political thing. it is not a documentary, as you can probably tell from the shoes references and everything, but this key plot twist in the movie, "legally blond 2," the discharge petition, that is a real thing in our politics. there are 435 members in the house. so 218 is a majority. and if you can get that majority, if you can get 218 members of the house to sign a discharge petition, then "legally blond 2" is right. you can send a bill straight to the floor for a vote even if the speaker of the house doesn't want it to be voted on. even if it hasn't gone through committee and all the rest. it is a weird and arcane, but real shortcut that you really can take with popular legislation that is otherwise not going to get a vote despite its popularity. it almost never happens. happened once on a gun bill in 1986. happened once on a campaign finance bill in 2002. it's rare, but it is possible. and in the house right now, republicans are in the majority, but it's not that huge of a majority. and if all of

we know we will be heard from from our experts on a legal side. a lot of them can really add up here this gentleman again had heard about a situation where someone had already racked up $40,000 with of legal fees. became an issue. we are not talking about what it costs to fix up which in itself would be excess of, but also the legal component. your word of mouth and the people you know will really help. and, of course, to our media folks, people will read your articles and understand that they can really do a lot to protect their businesses early on. >> i just want to add one comment about getting our association involved. we put together a really great training. we have a panel available to you. it is only going to cost you $35 for a 30-minute conversation, and that might be the best $35 you have already spent to avoid something that will be happening in the future. that is just part of the collaborative process with supervisor chu's office, and i am very grateful to her. there is a panel of lawyers that have all attended training and know-how to

>> it is approved with legal and/or legal weatr hampered or if anything goes , business is wonderful. >> in new york you could eat 100 you just have a to make but in colorado were those legalize products you could just take one or two? >> with a person like a cancer patient yesterday it is hard for them to eat they don't have an appete they said no prescribed medication but the candy is good for them to help their appetite and make them feel better. >> what kind of reaction do you get when they see your truck? and show them. >> they get excited. some people try to call the police saying that we are selling marijuana. >> are you franchising? homage to make? i assume you're doing pretty well. >> whave several homers and a couple dozen vehicles across the country. >> coverage does it cost to buy into the franchise? >> 100,000. >>hat is more than a subway. but first you have al homageo gr year nationwide? >> i will let my lawyer get in touch with y. >> just like dash and pitcher though boyer will be in touch with you. [laughter] when it is legal we did have another discussion and. i will

from the asian pacific islander legal outreach, executive director dean ito taylor. program director from the catholic charities cyo christopher martinez. amy wang [speaker not understood]. cheryl madrid, jewish services. and [speaker not understood], executive director from la rasa community resource center. together all the partners have invited over 30 of our clients to join us to celebrate today and they're standing in the mayor's office right now, so happy that they're part of this celebration. i think together we represent the diversity of san francisco and many of the ethnic communities that so desperately need naturalization services, from legal consultation to completion of the 10-page n. 400 forms, to the fee waiver forms to help them get a waiver for the 680 dollars application fee to become citizen. together our collaborative covers all of the major languages spoken by our clients, chinese, spanish, vietnamese, russian, other eastern european languages, burmese, tagalog and others. we urge you to attend upcoming naturalization workshop on august 10, 2013,

it could be beneficial to have that legal expertise readily at hand. the task inspector may have learned some useful information. it is also helpful if your task inspector knows the contractor because the contractor can provide you with a construction bid for what is going to take. so i want to leave you with some closing thoughts. one of them, as mentioned at the beginning -- be proactive. do not wait for the letter. get the inspection now. the second is keep really good records. [inaudible] they had actually been doing work over the years. they have been removing barriers. but because they were not keeping good files documenting the reasons why they widened a door or replace the hardware or remodel the bathroom, tracking exactly how much money they spend, they do not get a whole lot of credit for the work they have done so far. but you also want to keep good records tissue products you will be taking on in the future. maybe you cannot remove that step this year or next year. maybe it will take you five years to get there. but you are providing yourse

should it be legal or not? joining us is dr. sanjay gupta and howard samuels. we spoke before about this. you feel very strongly from your own experiences as a personal addict and treating other addicts that it's a real gateway drug, marijuana and we should not be encouraging it to be legalized. >> well, absolutely. i mean, i think that the doctor has a very good point that for medical purposes, marijuana can be very, very useful. but you have to understand, the vast majority of people that use weed use it to get loaded. they use it to get high. and look, i'm not here to say that it's, you know, worse than alcohol. of course, it's not worse than alcohol but why in the world would we legalize another drug so the nation's youth have another substance to abuse and medicate their feelings with? you know, this is to me, the issue. we don't want to go from one extreme reefer madness, which we know is a total exaggeration, but we don't want to go to the other extreme where we legalize this drug and endanger so many young people. we want to find a healthy balance. >> l

more legal news there, too. you just -- you just guaranteed yourself a guest appearance on an upcoming program about casey anthony's civil legal woes. okay, you two. thank you very much for that. >>> we still have other news coming up. in fact, i have seen this happen before, and i still can't believe it happens. a fan falling to his death at a stadium. this time at the atlanta braves stadium. not the first time. we're going to take you live to turner field and tell you what happened next. i'm beth... and i'm michelle. and we own the paper cottage. it's a stationery and gifts store. anything we purchase for the paper cottage goes on our ink card. so you can manage your business expenses and access them online instantly with the game changing app from ink. we didn't get into business to spend time managing receipts, that's why we have ink. we like being in business because we like being creative, we like interacting with people. so you have time to focus on the things you love. ink from chase. so you can. ♪ eve

well we really have to get a little bit more precise in our definition there's money and legal tender and no bit coins are not legal tender they're not currency or they're not funds what i think that the judge was getting at is the big coin is money in the sense of its consideration it's something of value and it was handed over to the ponzi scam operator as consideration with this common expectation of an investment and you know whether you're contributing big coins or oranges from an orange grove or whatever and those are some other securities regs cases you know that's really what the judges are looking at he's not going to throw out the ponzi scam because somebody contributed something of value even though it wasn't legal tender currency funds and also this person operating the ponzi scam should be very careful about any potential i.r.s. implications for example forgiveness of debt one like if you get short sell your house and you get for it. that that actually constitutes income for i.r.s. purposes and so this ponzi scam operator when he defaulted on all those obligations to peop

what's legal and what's that you know is it legal to steal is it ethically morally it. was legal and was ethical and morally two different things. you don't betray people you know it's like the courts that are supposed to defend you be trading in you feel you feel betrayed. they're orchestrating the process so that they will eventually went with their wind because people are beat down and there they are tired of the fight or they don't even have the money to pay for the lawyers. now if lee has unlimited funds you know we don't have the legal funds we don't have the the p.r. machines behind us but if you look at their message in freiburg they're good neighbor policy and you look at their message throughout the country they're all very self-serving they have a project called project wet for water education in the community school systems well old sheeny they did a pilot program in freiburg isn't that interesting and then they can say look we did a pilot program for project wet for water education look we're helping the community well you're helping the community conserve

>> john: cover his legal fees. don't worry. there is no way the people of sand yieg are going to grant him that request. in fact, i think he's better pawoff tryingto raise the moneyn ( cheers and applause ) >> john: welcome back. my guest tonight, an actor who can currently be seen in "smurf 2" and his upcoming film is "lovelace." ♪ if you ain't in your thing like you want to get your thing ♪ >> jerry? >> yeah. >> not a cloud in the sky. what's with the ( bleep ) shad shadows. your shad rose costing me hundreds of dollars. >> you want to turn the lights off. ( bleep ). no problem. i'll turn them off. ( bleep ). >> make a movie without lights. >> john: please welcome back to the show the fantastic hank azaria. ( cheers and applause ) >> john: please, please, please. "lovelace," it's about linda lovelace, of course, star and/or victim of "deep throat." >> yes, talk about the lace on my wig as you saw there. >> john: that was some wig. when someone comes to you and says we're looking for a cd exploitative greaseball in this mo

legal process? there is a lot involved here. you are helping with the piece that is the actual filling out the paperwork. >> exactly. helping them get over that hurdle. they partner with lots of adult schools, english language learning schools, civics learning schools, even banks and lending circles to get the fee. they partner with lots of organizations. >> let's come down the line. you guys are working with business. what are they helping people do? >> i will use the example in washington dc. we work with marriott. our first session was with the housekeeping staff. we met two women who have been working at the marriott for 10- 15 years. they have been eligible for naturalization and the one reason they have not taken that final step is because they had a one-hour commute on the train every day. they lived in suburban virginia. they were working eight hours a day, taking two hours to get back and forth home and they have things to do at home. they were so happy to be able to come to work and for th

we are proud of the legal immigration system. for us to spend huge amount of our resources on people who come here illegally which would encourage more people to come here illegally is a betrayal of our american family. we should be concerned about our own americans rather than spending our limited resources on people who have come here illegally and thumbing their nose at us by breaking our law to be here. >> thanks so much. we are a little overtime. thank you for joining us. dana rohrabacher who is the chair of the subcommittee that oversees europe and others. thank you. >> thank you. >> let me start with our first topic, russia. the congressman called russia vital to our national security. he emphasized how strategically important the relationship. what is the reality of russia's ability to influence our interest globally? >> i think it was very important to during obama's first term. they needed this huge volume of traffic, material and the nation, going into afghanistan to support the war effort. we needed them there. it was

can they do it legally any other way? can they get their hands on it and try this for their children any other way, danny? >> not in new jersey. that's the fascinating thing is that we're now getting that patch work legal mess in all these several states. and isn't america fascinating in this we take marijuana and we place it in schedule 1. that means the government thinks it has no medicinal value and a high level of addiction. compare that to alcohol that has no medicinal value and a high level of addiction. america has a fascinating view of its drugs. alcohol is in our history and traditions is legal, and the court has used that term, history and traditions. marijuana is not part of that. >> i'll do you one even better, i learned from sanjay's report on weed, that the government holds a patent on doing research. danny and jeff are going to stick around because we do have a lot more reporting and i do want to remind you once again that sanjay gupta has a special on the highs and lows of weed, you have to watch it for ch

>> john: cover his legal fees. don't worry. there is no way the people of sand yieg are going to grant him that request. in fact, i think he's better pawoff tryingto raise the mon on í$h,eñ euu)r hsq@q@,x-x ( cheers and applause ) >> john: welcome back. my guest tonight, an actor who can currently be seen in "smurf 2" and his upcoming film is "lovelace." ♪ if you ain't in your thing like you want to get your thing ♪ >> jerry? >> yeah. >> not a cloud in the sky. what's with the ( bleep ) shad shadows. your shad rose costing me hundreds of dollars. >> you want to turn the lights off. ( bleep ). no problem. i'll turn them off. ( bleep ). >> make a movie without lights. >> john: please welcome back to the show the fantastic hank azaria. ( cheers and applause ) >> john: please, please, please. "lovelace," it's about linda lovelace, of course, star and/or victim of "deep throat." >> yes, talk about the lace on my wig as you saw there. >> john: that was some wig. when someone comes to you and says we're looking for a cd exploita

you have the duty to defend him legally. what were your thoughts when you heard about those comments from the attorney? >> well, i certainly don't think that a lawyer should be out promulgating that his client is not a monster when he is clearly a monster. mr. castro is a monster and dahmer was a monster. dahmer was sick, mentally ill. no question about that. not legally mentally ill, but certainly mentally ill medically. and he was a monster. and mr. castro is at least as bad as dahmer, keeping three young, beautiful women in that kind of a harrowing situation for ten years. so, to say anything positive about him is poppycock. >> i have a bunch of legal stories that i think you're perfect to weigh in on. can you? >> are you asking me, ashleigh? >> yeah. i'm not sure if you could hear me or not. we're going to move on to some other legal stories. gerry, thank you so much for your insight on that. we have another story coming up that will make our viewers pretty darn angry. a disabled man, a man wounded for defending this cou

memos purporting to explain why the policy is legal and constitutional american people aren't getting the information they would need to come to an informed decision about this policy. you know should hold the media to a high standard the government is making their job very difficult with the secrecy of the clampdown and information to crack down on willful blowers the refusal to disclose basic information like who were fighting how many people have been killed how many civilians have been killed what's the legal justification the obama administration is refusing to disclose any of this information and that makes it much harder for the media to do their jobs now dozens of casualties are reported in two separate incidents in a chip one was a failed prison break a tam by detain muslim brotherhood supporters the other and militant ambush of police in another volatile sign up police bosses in the volatile sinai area and if this continues a week of deadly fighting across the country with over eight hundred people killed in clashes between islam and activists and security forces well we're

they said, no. >> so it is all legal? >> well, that is what happens when any agency gets to do what it wants to do for years and years and years without anybody looking over its shoulder. this agency has also done things in the area of medical marijuana, scientific research, the scheduling process of drugs were by they would go through the legal process, to the minister it of law process judges comehave down with recommendations that are scientifically based, that are credible, and then they will have to pollute the appointed head of the agency overruled those recommendations for no purpose whatsoever. once again, congress is not asking any questions. obviously, the obama administration's job as well an error holders job as well, but it is ultimately converses job that has to care about these things. i am hoping it is not just democrats in the senate, but republicans in the house will say, this agency is gone too far. republicans have never been great friends of overstepping federal police power and i hope they can find s

---en chicago, ya se han tomado algunas medidas contra un bufete legal. blanca ---los choques recientes de trenes de alta velocidad en espaÑa y suiza... take vo ...han instado a los impulsores del "tren bala" planeado para california, a declarar que ese tipo de tragedias no podrian ocurrir aqui. ---la agencia encargada de la construccion del sistema ferroviario dijo que entre los planes de construccion, est la instalacion de sistemas de seguridad para prevenir accidentes de ese tipo. ---el tren de california toma como modelo el sistema japones, el cual en su existencia de 50 aÑos nunca ha registrado un descarrilamie nto que haya causado muertes. blanca ---publicar fotos y videos en las redes sociales, le ayuda a compartir momentos especiales pero tambien podria llevarlo a caer en las garras de los delincuentes y ner riesgo la segurida d ---victor hugo rodriguez nos cuenta por que. take pkg 0:01 0:25 pkg stop open blanca ---queda liberado de toda culpa... raul salinas de gortari, hermano del ex-presidente de mexico. take 2 box ---jazive perez nos amplia

hansen earlier and i think that he claimed earlier that there was evidence that this was a legally a three unit building time of the jurisdiction request and early on it would have been e

the second is legal assistance. surprising. you did not see this on the video and i never thought of this. the first thing individuals need, not to feel like gang members -- is to erase their past. they have literally talked with me about feeling -- removing these tattoos and legal excitement. it is not that simple. changing from being a gang member to a former gang member involves a change in identity. this is a tricky process. it is slow and steady, and there is frustration. the gang is replaced with drugs, and there are fallbacks. relapses, connections, there are struggles. this is where collaboration needs to take hold. it has now become a cliche, to say that we cannot rest on our way out of this problem. i no longer want to hear those words. this is not to give the law- enforcement a short shrift. i have had an impact on my husband's life, some of the unwanted. but he has had an impact on mind. i have done extensive work with law enforcement, with the lapd and the los angeles county sheriff's. i am here to tell you that cr

what's legal. and what's that you know is it legal to steal is it ethically morally it. was legal and was ethical and morally two different things. you don't be trained people eat you know it's like the courts that are supposed to defend you betray and you feel you feel betrayed. they're orchestrating the process so that they will eventually win with their win because people are beat down and there they are tired of the fight or they don't even have the money to pay for the lawyers. nestle has unlimited funds you know we don't have the legal funds we don't have the the p.r. machines behind us but if you look at their message in freiburg they're good neighbor policy and you look at their message throughout the country they're all very self-serving they have a project called project wet for water education in the community school systems well all cheek they did a pilot program in freiburg isn't that interesting and then they can say look we did a pilot program for project wet for water education look we're helping the community well you're helping the community conserve wa

>> my legal stuff that went through and tore up. you know, i mean, so i don't know what has been taken and what's not been taken. >> okay. we have no interest in taking your legal stuff. you do understand that, right? >> it is taking me out of my -- >> out of your element. you're here early. exactly. >> i need -- i had deadlines. i need my legal stuff. >> it's clear you are frustrated and angry, right? >> yeah. >> get me an opportunity to get with the booking sergeant and get you your legal stuff. anticipate we'll be done with it, okay? >> master deputy steven gray is one of the jail's internal investigators. he knows singletary from his prior stays at the jail. >> what i got here is the paperwork that was confiscated from inmate singletary. and i suspect it's the reason why he's upset. what we got is income tax forms here, you know, we have 1040 ez forms and 4852s that he has filled out all different individuals. they've got all their social security numbers on here. on his little homemade spreadsheet we have a refund due anywhere

that faces pro-legalization and anti-legalization forces? >> well, it didn't change the doctrine or the strategy. what it does, it reinforces what we're already doing. that is, we have gotten to the place we're at now which is 13 states plus the district of columbia, through different means. we have it through court decisions, a bunch of state legislatures passed those bills and then the people voted last fall in the ballot in three states. and our way forward is more of the same. we will go to state legislatures and go to the ballot and where appropriate, go to court. >> professorred eastman last week a new jersey court heard an appeal of the xoifting state law there, based on the supreme court's reasoning in the case. the montgomery county in pennsylvania is marrying people contrary to the laws of pennsylvania. would this change what the anti-legalization forces have to do now? >> i think it's very important and the people that are opposed to redefining the core institution of marriage are going to continue to fight. justice kennedy's opin