supreme court was on board with the full throttle corporate takeover political system and they would do nothing to stop it they would do nothing to stop the degradation of the corruption of our actions. stay true to her want more from my one on one with robert mcfadden next. leap on your cultural phenomena like a community college face the type you know. pleasure to have you with us here on our team today i roll researcher. live. live live. live . dramas that trying to be ignored. stories others refuse to notice. faces change the world writes never. come full picture of today's leaves. on this month from around the globe. up to. fifty. for the of the. let's get back to my interview with robert machete. what does it mean to you that money is protected and of the first amendment now. well it shows a fundamental shameful ignorance or cynicism by the court towards democracy and towards the american tradition there's been a longstanding tradition in american politics they're trying to encourage small donors working class middle class people to pay for campaigns with small donations twenty

supreme court was on board with the full throttle corporate takeover political system and they would do nothing to stop it they would do nothing to stop the degradation of the corruption of our actions. stay tuned to hear want more from my one on one with brother much as next. to the future please to this mistake knowledge is the name in aviation is the game is ladies still trying to take a leap into the much simpler and noble postals brings innovations new heights and don't lose ground the green knight shaped looks of things come to you as you update if you're on the. move to the central. i think. we're going to go digital the price is the only industry specifically mentioned in the constitution and. that's because a free and open process is critical to our democracy which albus. role. in fact the single biggest threat facing our nation today is the corporate takeover of our government and across several we've been hijacked lying handful of transnational corporations that will profit by destroying what our founding fathers once told just my job market and on this show we reveal the

supreme court was on board with the full throttle corporate takeover political system and they would do nothing to stop it they would do nothing to stop the degradation of the corruption of our actions. stay tuned here want more from my one on one with robert mcfadden next. to the. technology is the name in aviation is the game which is late he still fights to the much unknowable toas souls brings innovations new heights and don't we ground the green knight shaped blocks of this country she obtained cheer on a. potential. this point be an expensive car saloon. clueless a new fashion show. also designer bags and shoes in the best shop windows. luxury is a school. is a lost cause. constantly on archie. right from the scene took. the first trip to a night with think picture. on a reporter's twitter. and instagram. to be in the know. on mom. let's get back to my own. agree with robert mackenzie. what does it mean to you that money is protected of the first amendment now. well it shows a fundamental error shameful ignorance or cynicism by the courts towards democracy internecine american

supreme court was on board with the full throttle corporate takeover political system and they would do nothing to stop it they would do nothing to stop the degradation of the corruption of our actions. stay tuned to hear want more from my one on one with robert much as the next. spice k two scooby snacks the insulting thing is that they actually have the nerve to call if. you smoke and chemical you're smoking something that is laced with your even know what they are many many different than me i'm in my attic dr there is no real use for. there's no way the regulations are going to be must just be smoking why do you have no idea what is in that. i know c.n.n. the most n.b.c. and fox news have taken some not slightly but the fact is i admire their commitment to cover all sides of the story just in case one of them happens to be accurate. that was funny but it's close and for the truth and might think. it's because when full attention and the mainstream media works side by side the joke is actually on here. and our teen years we have a different brain. because the news of the world jus

supreme court was on board with the full throttle corporate takeover political system and they would do nothing to stop it they would do nothing to stop the degradation of the corruption of our actions. state attorney here want more from my one on one with the next. wealthy british style. spot on. the market. find out what's really happening to the global economy with mike stronger for a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines to report. her. face it needs the. economic ups and downs in the final tolerable months day the london new york sang i and the rest of the. case you will be everything we own all claiming the end. of the inevitability of blowback in the perverse logic of terrorism ever since the us embarked on its so-called war on terror acts of terror and terrorist networks of political rated the recent deadly massacre in kenya is a case in point so is washington's anti-terrorist strategy that is worse than the disease. we've. come. to the. truth. comes. out. for the. of the. let's get back to my interview with robert mccarthy. what does it mean to you that mone

can you tell us about some if any ofing days -- us would care to watch the supreme court in action but would not care to encounter a line over the horizon. when are we most likely to be successful with that shorter line? [laughter] >> don has the responsibility to argue the most important cases in america. you are talking about my cases. [laughter] >> you and i argue against each other sometimes. are not going to get in line for the fate of a obamacare or abortion, on the first day of the term, i will whether the securities litigation uniform standards act prevents people from filing suit under state law in texas and louisiana to try and bring claims arising from the stanford ponzi scheme, he sold about seven million dollars of certificates but was buying other things. it is whether you can bring a lawsuit about that. technical question of law but that is an illustration of the fact that nine cases of the supreme court out of 10 present relatively ordinary questions of federal law. we have these disagreements over the contraception mandate and that is the supreme court to job principal

at least for those of us covering the supreme court, they don't -- they have not consistently always sided against religious institutions. >> tremendous. we have three more cases to turn to before we get to your questions. i am going to talk about the trivial passing subject of abortion. [laughter] it is an area of the law that fits the bill of the theme of areas where justice kennedy was in dissent and justice o'connor was in the majority on the court. his views have the potential to emerge as controlling. the first one is about abortion protests, which is a free-speech case of the first amendment. it is about protesters at the facilities and medical health clinics that offer surgical abortions. you have to step back to the previous precedent which was called hill versus colorado with justice kennedy in dissent and the court upheld an eight- foot floating buffer zone. that means literally, you cannot approach a person within a certain number of feet. in that case, with respect to any health facility, a person who is approaching and you wanted to say something to them, you had to sta

supreme court decision back in june, she used that to push same-sex marriage through. so this is a significant ruling and new jersey is a bellwether state. this could set a precedent for america. >> explain chris christie's decision. he voted a same sex marriage bill, now he says it should be up to the voters to put it on the ballot in november. >> reporter: right. this ruling, allison, comes a year after governor christie vetoed that bill. his press secretary put out a statement after that ruling, and it said christi always maintained that he would abide by the will of the voters on marriage equality. since the legislature refused to allow the people to decide expeditiously, we will let the supreme court make this constitutional determination. governor christie, he wants this issue to be on the ballot this election day. allison? >> all right, margaret conley, thanks so much. >>> the world's weather, did you notice it is changing. a new report says you and i are to blame for it. chad myers is following that for us. ♪ (train horn) vo: wherever our trains go, the econo

. >> she's used the supreme court decisions which were handed down earlier in the summer, very technical decisions, which open the door just a crack to gay marriage. and she's used the rationale of those decisions to say the new jersey constitution requires gay marriage, because equal protection of the law requires that haul new jersey citizens be treated the same. >> callan said it was a surprising and forceful decision. >> what happens next then? >> this ruling is binding unless there's an appeal. it seems that governor christie is going to want to do that, and that could force an implementation delay. >> well, how likely is the new jersey supreme court to reverse this decision? >> new jersey's supreme court in 2006, they ruled that same-sex couples were entitled to the same rights as heterosexual couples. now, this judge, she's using that and the u.s. supreme court decision back in june to push same-sex marriage through. it's a significant ruling in that new jersey is a bellwether state. this could set a precedent for the rest of america. >> can you explain christie's position on this

. >> she used the supreme court decisions handed down earlier in the summer, very technical decisions that opened the door a crack to gay marriage. she's used the rational of those decisions to say the new jersey constitution requires gay marriage. equal protection of the law requires all new jersey citizens be treated the same. >> this comes a year after governor chrischristie vetoed same-sex marriage. he plans to veto the ruling. christie maintained held abide by the will of the voters. we will let the supreme court make this constitutional determination. governor christie wants this issue on the ballot this election day. now this will be looked at closely. new jersey is seen as a bellwether state and this law could set a precedent for the rest of america. don? >> thank you very much for that. >>> a study confirms most scientists suspected for a long time, humans are the cause for climate change. >> i'm chad myers in florida. people here understand the dangers of sea level rise. i'll talk to the nation's foremost expert, coming up. we lowered her fever. [ f] you raise her spirits. w

but from 1953 until last month us supreme court decision on the patenting of genes, mystery after mistry has fallen. the relentless advances of biological sciences have been there. any number of articles start the way the new york times had it not too ago -- that we are on the rink of altering life. over and over again, you hear on the brink of changing this, on the cusp of a new wave of inventions. on to work on the code, as did others. the code that was carried in dna. all proteins are derived from the 20 amino acids. the basic life forms from bacteria, to wail, to human. 20 amino acids. in a sense, the industrial revolution of biotechnology was underway, particularly in the 1970s, as it turned out, not surprisingly, that scientists theovered you could open up dna component of an organism and insert new pieces called recombinant dna, a tech week being developed. what does it allow you to do? it allows you to swap genes between species. sense, it allowed you to design specific characteristics that you wanted to have show up in a given organism. in animal breeding and farming, regulate d

indian supreme court banned the use of children in circuses two years ago, but activists believe there are as many as 300 children napoli children still working in the circus. she was 12 years old when she was rescued. according to that pole rescue agency, many children struggle to readjust. >> most of the children don't want to express how abused. the education, they will be very, very weak because of the beating on the head. they are beat mostly on the head, because on the body for their beat, they are see the marks. >> reporter: for these children circus katmandu has given new help. >> they are going to change the history of circus in thnepal. ♪ >> reporter: and already with each performance, these children are doing just that, trainers who volunteer with them, say they are now good to go, and perform around the world. with luck circus cat mon due will go global soon. >> the government of nepal does not comply with the international standard for trafficking, but attempting to do so. >>> while it may be warming up globally, locally tonight it's cooling off, and fall we have chilly

a method to this, and the method tells us that the supreme court has to do that once a sentence has been pronounced. >> reporter: legal experts say it's rare to see a judge change his mind so much in just a week and a half. >> judges don't typically issue orders saying mea culpa or i may have been wrong. the traditional course is going to be wait to see what happens with the appeal. >> i know you just spoke to the teenager's mother, her first interview since he was announced. there might be a new hearing that could bring justice for her daughter. what did she tell you? >> reporter: well, what she said is what she thinks is really being lost here, erin, by the system, by this judge, is this is her loss. this is the loss of a life of a young girl, 14 years old, and she is going to be there tomorrow to try to remind everyone of that. here's what she told us. >> he needs to pay for his crime, and 31 days is not it. i mean, 31 days? she was a kid. she was my kid. i'm a little biased, though. you know, i don't know. whatever the judges decide, as long as it's more than 31 days, because th

and the method tells us that the supreme court has to do that once a sentence has been pronounced. >> reporter: legal experts say it's rare to see a judge change his mind so much in just a week and a half. >> judges don't typically issue orders saying mea culpa or saying i may have been wrong in applying this sentence. if a judge applies an illegal sentence, the traditional course is going to be wait to see what happens with the appeal. >> now, i know you just spoke to the teenager's mother, her first interview since it was announced there might be a new hearing to bring some justice to her daughter, although two years still seems like a light sentence to many. what did she dell you? >> reporter: what she said is what she thinks is really being lost here, erin, by the system, by this judge is that this is her loss. this is the loss of a life of a young girl, 14 years old, and she is going to be there tomorrow to try to remind everyone of that. here's what she told us -- >> he needs to pay for his crime and 31 days is not it. i mean, 31 days? she was a kid. she was my kid. i'm a little

can you tell us about some uninteresting days -- if any of us would care to watch the supreme court in action but would not care to encounter a line over the horizon. when are we most likely to be successful with that shorter line? [laughter] >> don has the responsibility to argue the most important cases in america. you are talking about my cases. [laughter] >> you and i argue against each other sometimes. >> if you are not going to get in line for the fate of obamacare or abortion, on the first day of the term, i will argue about whether the securities litigation uniform standards act prevents people from filing suit under state law in texas and louisiana to try and bring claims arising from the stanford ponzi scheme, he sold about seven billion dollars of certificates but was buying polo ponies in antigua. it is whether you can bring a lawsuit about that. that is a technical question of law but that is an illustration of the fact that nine cases of the supreme court out of 10 present relatively ordinary questions of federal law. we have these disagreements over the contraception man

indian supreme court banned the use of children in circuses two years. but there are still hundreds of people still working in circuses. more than 300 napoli children have been rescued from circuses in india. according to nepal rescue agency many children struggle to readjust. >> most of the children they don't want to express how really abused. main problem is the memory problems. many children the education will be very, very weak because of the beating on the head, you know. they beat mostly on the head, because on the body if they are beat you can see the mark. >> they are going to change the culture and history of circus in nepal. they are not aware of it, but they are the first circus company in nepal, and they are going to change people's perceptions of what circus is. ♪ >> reporter: and already with each performance, these children are doing just that. trainers who volunteer with them say they are now good to go, and perform around the world. with luck, circus katmandu will go global soon. >>> the government in nepal was not comply with the min

now, you can watch us in hd. solicitor previews the supreme court. finance, affirmative action, and presidential authority. smithsonian's associates hosted the two-hour event. >> good afternoon. i almost said good morning. it is afternoon now. aty of you spent the morning the supreme court. a wonderful opportunity. you got to meet megan jones, a programs manager. and the counselor to the chief justice of the united states. this afternoon, a wonderful panel. i have given you a handout with their bios so we can save a little bit of time. they want to get right to it. i am sure you want to get right to listening to it. before i turn this over to them, can i please ask you to turn off your cell phones if you have them on? you might notice some of the names have changed on the bios. there are schedules attorneys are not always in charge of. still an excellent panel here. just as a follow-up for a lot of you who are supreme court aficionados, we have a justice coming here in january. you might want to look for that in our its catalog. i will turn this over

the supreme court upheld it. here's how he responded to those of us that raised the point this is the law, we need to move forward. >> i can't wait. >> it's the law of the land, right? well, let's see. what else at one time was the law of the land? slavery. and there was even one time the supreme court upheld it. yeah, slavery used to be the law of the land. >> 30 million people will get health insurance, and he compares this to slavery being the law of the land. as tempted as i am, congressman, i'll let you respond. i won't even touch that one. >> no. i think that's just as well that you not. but you know, you have to wonder why they're getting so extreme, so far out on this. i think it's probably because they're so afraid it's going to work. that's why they're trying to stop it. they're deathly afraid that when it goes in, it's going to show that all of these scare tactics and so on, they were for naught. that it was in everyone's benefit. when it does become not just the law of the land but engrained in our cu

and i think in what is happening in state courts now, with elected judges, with the supreme court decision opening, closing down judicial codes of conduct, and now the infusion of money, i think really puts us in a very difficult position. >> i have to just let me agree with that. i mean absolutely. and you see, i've dissented in that case in the supreme court. i have to be consistent. i have to take that point of view, that the states do have the power to regulate what these judges will say when they're running for judicial election through codes of conduct. but now, same problem. the problem is that then we have to make these distinctions. so i say, okay, that's what we're there for. it's a huge problem, just as campaign finance is a huge problem. and i think we have to make those decisions. but there are two points of view. >> another question. it's hard for us to see. yes. there's a hand over here. if we could get a microphone somehow ferried over there. >> thank you. i'm curious and i'm trying to think how to ask my question really, really clearly. i'd love to get your perspective on

and supreme court in past cases has said that's permissible because it's tradition, not religion. this is a recitation of words. is there a difference? >> one of the questions that the lower court decided with the defendants' request, is this a prayer or a pledge to the country that happens to have a couple of religious words in it? that's the defining issue here. so far past cases have not been on the side of the plaintiff but they're bringing a new legal theory here so we'll have to figure out what happened. gregg: what do you think could happen? >> it could go either way. i think if the words were removed, we wouldn't be a weaker country because of it. gregg: do you agree? >> i'm not sure how it's going to go at this point. gregg: good to see you both. thanks so much. arthel: thank you. more coverage of the crisis in syria coming up and the possibility of u.s. military action in the middle east. we're life at the white house as president obama prepares to meet with two leading republican senators. and north korea backing out of a planned meeting with a special u.s. envoy as we

supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg officiated at a ceremony saturday night. i'm veronica de la cruz. now back to lockup. >>> due to mature subject matter, viewer discretion is advised. >> metro corrections. the time is approximately 17:45 hours. i've activated for antonio coleman. he's on five north. one cell 3. >> antonio coleman had recently been put on suicide watch at the louisville metro department of corrections jail. now, the special operations response team, or s.o.r.t., has been sent to remove him from his cell due to a disturbance. >> 10-4, come on. coleman has flooded his cell. his excessive beating on the door was placing him in danger. hitting his head on the wall, he threatened the officer on the walk saying he was going to hit his ass. >> face the rear of your cell and go down to your knees. down to your knees. cross your ankles, place your hands on top of your head. we'll go on three, one, two, three. >> coleman is placed into an emergency restraint chair. he will be bound at the legs, wrists and waist. >> we can clean the water up and things

they loved supreme court appointments. the exclusion, he wasn't wing enough. makes you wonder what he had to do to get an a from from them. classify being a straight, white male as a hate crime, make oliver stone secretary of state, arrest all fnc employees. disappointed left wing academics which obama is meaning he agrees with the gray he got. he like them wishes he had done more. we should be grateful he only earned a borks minus. this has to be bad for us. imagine the state of our lives if he had gotten an a. he has three more years. it's a shame he doesn't major in music appreciation r. >> he's had many concerts at white house with tax pay hpayer. >> i'm for that. the more fun he has, the less taxpayer money -- >> i provide evidence that proves me to be correct. >> this is 200 professors. i think they probably thought he was not liberal enough. in some cases, i don't think he was liberal enough. there wouldn't be obama care if up to me. there would be one fair plan for the united states. i don't like that. the idea about closing gitmo, i don't have a probl

court of this state has use ited very dramatically in order to find for a party seeking a set of public records. and i will hope that if you do anything like this again, that there will be a serious legal approach to it because that is what it really requires. thank you. >> don't give money to the friends of the library or accept money from the friends of the library. >> truthfully it does not matter whether you have handling violations or enforcement violations i do have a proposal though, and i suggest that they put the violations of the sunshine ordinance and, now what is the point, the point should be obvious. and are you going to come back in october propose, didling the violation and not take the public comment because it is not as subnative change? no. it is a substantial change, goodness knows that you should take the public comment. thank you. >> all of those in favor of changing the title, including the word handling of violations? >> aye. >> aye. >> the motion passes. >> thank you. >> the contest is a creative idea. >> still could be done. >> next item is the annual report, t

to get the use of this dissipating and we will be getting news from the supreme court the apex court has in fact dismissed no vortices appeal as one would. be. taking a restraining order against indian companies from. also that the company. has the way for indian companies to continue copying the medicine and campaigners say it means poor people will still be able to get access to cheap generic forms of lifesaving treatment. according to the court's dismisses decision no payton rights are given to the. original pharmaceutical formulation but a new version of an older drug. the decision is to set a legal precedent for other similar cases for other pharmaceutical industries a meditating similar pain rights. but the great interest at stake do not leave much hope that something similar will not be attempted again in the future. for now this important battle has finally been won. even before. even after the. and more greedy that is what i think this is something that you could do james i mean the good ones would come to the general people of the poor people i think that that aspect has to

they loved supreme court appointments. the exclusion, he wasn't wing enough. makes you wonder what he had to do to get an a from from them. classify being a straight, white male as a hate crime, make oliver stone secretary of state, arrest all fnc employees. disappointed left wing academics which obama is meaning he agrees with the gray he got. he like them wishes he had done more. we should be grateful he only earned a borks minus. this has to be bad for us. imagine the state of our lives if he had gotten an a. he has three more years. it's a shame he doesn't major in music appreciation r. >> he's had many concerts at white house with tax pay hpayer. >> i'm for that. the more fun he has, the less taxpayer money -- >> i provide evidence that proves me to be correct. >> this is 200 i think they proe was not liberal enough. in some cases, i don't think he was liberal enough. there wouldn't be obama care if up to me. there would be one fair plan for the united states. i don't like that. the idea about closing gitmo, i don't have a problem leaving it open. you can

to get use of this dissipating and we will be getting news from the supreme court that the apex court has in fact dismissed no vortices appeal as one would. be. taking adverse trade ordered against indian companies for manufacturing. companies to go so that. there's the way for indian companies to continue copying the medicine and i mean to say it means poor people will still be able to get access to cheap generic forms of lifesaving treatment. according to the courts dismiss this decision no payton rights are given to the. original pharmaceutical formulation of an older drug. the decision is to set a legal precedent for other similar cases for other pharmaceutical industries a meditating similar pain rights. but the great interest at stake do not leave much hope that something similar will not be attempted again in the future. for this important battle has finally been won. even. if. this. move. and more greedy that is what i think this is something dirty too big to change i mean the good ones who'd come to the general people of the poor people i think that that aspect has to go i ca

it is hard for some of us to believe that even as little of go as one or two years the supreme court might have come to that same conclusion. i am sure you say it probably would have, but tell us about -- >> the truth of the matter is i do not know. that is the truth. margie just put this very well. one, i do not know. two, she said exactly what i think. of course, what you are trying to do is decide the matter on the law on what is now, i look at the briefs, i look at the law, i try to get it right. my entire life is there in the open cases. by background of course matters. no, it does not matter. perfect. and you find a judge who says he does not think that -- they do. of course they do. and the third way and why this is such an interesting case in this area but to me, you have to think of loving errs is virginia. virginia.vs. it was the miscegenation case, interracial marriage. the question of whether a law forbidding interracial marriage was unconstitutional, which it was. the court had decided around. frankfurter said do not take this case, and he did not. they did not take it f

the use of the drugs to for medically induced abortions, then the supreme court could take it up and could present the first real look at row v. wade since the first abortion cases. and put roe v. wade and the breadth on the substantial. it is on hold until we hear back from the state court of appeal. a follow on to the affordable care act case that won on the behalf of the administration may be come together supreme court. >> let me give you a quick forecast on that. it's not an issue on the court's docket yet. we think it's likely soon and will be decided this term. one of the things that another affordable care act issue most people get their health insurance through their employers. one of the things that the affordable care act does is regulate the terms of those rans to ensure that the plans provide coverage for certain type of medical needs. under regulations of the department of health and human service. one of the things that employer-based health plans are going provide is contraceptive coverage. coverage for contra seption. now the hhs regulation also give religious employ

it is hard for some of us to believe that even as little of go as one or two years the supreme court might have come to that same conclusion. i am sure you say it probably would have, but tell us about that. >> the truth of the matter is i do not know. that is the truth. and margie just put this very well. one, i do not know. two, she said exactly what i think. of course, what you are trying to do is decide the matter on the law on what is now, i look at the briefs, i look at the law, i try to get it right. no, my entire life is there in the open cases. by background of course matters. no, it does not matter. perfect. and you find a judge who says he does not think that -- they do. of course they do. and the third way and why this is such an interesting case in this area but to me, you have to think of loving vs. irginia. it was the miscegenation case, interracial marriage. the question of whether a law forbidding interracial marriage was unconstitutional, which it was. the court had decided brown. frankfurter said do not take this case, and he did not. they did not take it for quite

court of this state has use ited very dramatically in order to find for a party seeking a set of public records. and i will hope that if you do anything like this again, that there will be a serious legal approach to it because that is what it really requires. >> don't give money to the friends of the library or accept money from the friends of the library. >> truthfully it does not matter whether you have handling violations or enforcement violations i do have a proposal though, and i suggest that they put the violations of the sunshine ordinance and, now what is the point, the point should be obvious. and are you going to come back in october propose, didling the violation and not take the public comment because it is not as subnative change? no. it is a substantial change, goodness knows that you should take the public comment. thank you. >> all of those in favor of changing the title, including the word handling of violations? >> aye. >> aye. >> the motion passes. >> thank you. >> the contest is a creative idea. >> still could be done. >> next item is the annual report, the draft th

this comes to us now after the oklahoma state supreme court said that the adoptive parents should have custody. a spoke woman says they are all heading home to south carolina. we got new photos of veronica with her adoptive parents. the couple says that the transition was not be traumatic and veronica had a chance to say good-bye to her biological father. >>> tonight, a father who never gave up look with his son is reunited with him 13 years later. the boy's grandmother is accused of kid snapping her grandson in 2000. >>> only four kids showed up to help brian holloway clean up his upstate new york home. about 300 kids broke into his home and wrecked it over labor day weekend. >>> the man who bought the $400 million power ball ticket has claimed his prize and wants to remain anonymous. lotto officials said it was only the second time he played. we'll be right back. just by talking to a helmet. it grabbed the patient's record before we even picked him up. it found out the doctor we needed was at st. anne's. wiggle your toes. [ driver ] and it got his okay on treatment from miles away. i

that california supreme court held was appropriate and that's how they were utilized. they were never done away with. now, maricopa county sheriff, who i really don't like -- [applause] i consider the man and a goof. he got a regular tank and then he painted it with the maricopa county colors and a star on it and it in their list of his deputies. finally to mention one of them if i might, please triet in response to the officer, my partner was murdered december 8, 1960 and was beating adequately and appropriately. the officers for a variety of reasons one because they were not in uniform. number two, because they put themselves in vulnerable positions and they are practically on sound. they are either on trained or they don't listen to them train. the majority of cops who were murdered of 12 years or more on the job or offered complacency and they put themselves in a position. finally, the president of the united states is protected by the secret service as you know. the cooperation between local, state and law enforcement should be given for the right reasons. we know

in the supreme court used for gutting the voting rights act was that racism was not as prevalent as it is today as it was back at the time that the voting rights act was passed. what i submit to you is that, you know, we have south africaen in apartheid. they imprisoned around -- [inaudible] at the height of the war united states have imprisoned over 4,800 black men per 100,000, you know? we have more people incarcerated, many -- more black males incarcerated today than there were slaves, you know? we have more kids that have died because of gun violence than the total amount of people who were hung back in the jim crow era. since sandy hook we've had over 4,800 gun deaths, majority of them are people of color. so i submit that racism is not -- has not declined, it has just taken on a different form. and it is more prevalent today than it was back then. and so when i think about this climate that we're in, you know, i'm reminded of what my mother told me a long time ago. she told me, he said, desmond, the tail does not wag the dog, the dog wags the tail. and we have to start understand

indian supreme court banned the use of children in circuses two years ago. activists believe there are still as many as 300 children from nepal working in indian circuses. more than 300 have already been rescue the. she was 12 years old when rescued. she finds talking about her past too traumatizing. many children struggle to readjust. >> theman problem is the memory problems. many children, education is very, very weak because of the beating on the head. they beat mostly on the head because they can hide it thunder the mask. >> they are going to change the culture and history of the circus in nepal. by just doing the work they're doing, they're going to change people's perception. >> already, with each performance, these children are doing just that. trainers who volunteer with them say that they are now good to go and perform around the world. with luck, circus kahmandu will go global soon. >> the u.s. state democratic said the government of nepal does not comply with the minimum standard for dealing with human trafficking, saying it is making significant

ruling,ding on the either for verizon or the fcc, could this case potentially go to the supreme court? >> oh, yeah. the last decision the fcc did not appeal to the supreme court, but that was because they were working on this rule, which is now in court. they have used the outline they were given in that decision to formulate this rule, hoping that it would pass muster. if it fails, there's a good chance that it could go to the supreme court. >> we are talking with ed wyatt of the "new york times." you were in the court today. give us a listener's guide. what can they expect? >> there was very aggressive questioning from the judges, particularly of the fcc. the argument was supposed to last one hour. it lasted two hours, and a full hour of that was the judges, when the fcc lawyer -- the judges pummeling the fcc lawyer with questions of when this could or could not apply. will hear the judges express some skepticism of verizon's arguments. on thet know if recording they differentiate -- you can tell who is speaking all the time, but it was a very lively argument. >> good morning. >> go

it went all the way to the supreme court. elaine quijano is with us. >> good morning, we sat down with her parents, matt and melanie capobiancos. they told us how they were there and raised her for the first two years of her life. while dustin brown said he misunderstand stood and never meant to sign away his parental right. it's a heart wrenching case. late monday evening, veronica's biological father dustin brown handed the child over to her adoptive parents, matt and melanie capobianco. it's a four-year battle that began shortly after the south carolina couple began the process of adopting veronica in 2009. her unmarried biological mother gave permission for veronica to be adopted by them. as a cheerky, she cited a federal law, protecting native-american being separated from their families and tribe. >> the only people that can really give you your history your ancestry is your family. >> reporter: the south carolina supreme court ruled in brown's favor and since 2011, veronica has lived with him and his wife robin. >> i w

the race baiting that he is using, especially on the heels of the supreme court disetion that said, you know what -- decision that said you know what, whatever the voting rights act did, the good it did for this country and it did a lot of good, we are past that point and we need to let the states carry on with what is in their per view and that is really in the election process. >> holder and the other critics say voter id in their view discriminates and suppresses the vote in. texas you have to drive 200 miles to a dmv miles to get one. not all of the counties have dmv offices to get this. so they say it is intentionally and politically motivated to suppress the minority vote. what are you doing in indiana to try and make your law more fair? it did pass the test at the supreme court. >> it did. we applied common sense. we put some decent safeguards in. we didn't charge people excessive amounts to get an identification card. in fact, they were free. we had education programs. we basically -- my strategy was we removed every argument that was brought up. we took it off the table by remo

what. >>> the california supreme court will hear arguments on whether an undocumented immigrant can get his law license in the state. sergio garcia of chico passed the bar exam four years ago but not able to get his law license because he came to the u.s. illegally as a child. garcia has taken the issue to the california supreme court and has the backing of attorney general harris and the state board of bar examiners but the obama administration, despite calling for immigration reform, has urges the court not to grant garcia a law license, saying it would conflict with current immigration laws. >>> good news coming out of tuolumne county. as advisories lifted when it comes to the rim fire. now 80 percent contains, barely spreading. steady at 236,000 acres burns. started august 17th. the cause of the fire under investigation. >>> 4:51. more than 1,000 rescues chickens on the way to east coast where they're put up for adoption. video of the hens from the animal place sanctuary. the hens are from a california egg farm who said the animals had outlived their youthfulness and about to be

. >> what do you think of the supreme court selecting a president? what do you think about the supreme court selecting the president? >> it lost its halo for me what. i always used to think it's the court. and even if i didn't agree i knew they knew the law and they knew much more. now i'm beginning to think they are as political as any of us want one. >> what is the most difficult question you have ever had to ask and what do you read each day? >> i read "the washington post" and "new york times" for starters. and then i sort of feel i have to read "the wall street journal" and usa today i try to read about five newspapers, but reading is exaggerating. if you give it a cursory to the i mean you get involved by everything but you try to know what's going on. that is your homework every day if you are a reporter. and -- >> the most difficult was there is no such thing as a bad question only a lousy answer. i think the toughest time for me was and 1974, they need me of the bureau chief of a free man bureau. i did become the bureau chief of the white ho

a huge amount of work outside the supreme court, as well. next to allison is don, a general of the united states. it is our incredible pleasure and good fortune he is able to be with us today. he is responsible for principally representing the united states in the supreme court but has other responsibilities, as well. and unbelievable public servant. the only thing worth mentioning is that, while he knows more about the supreme court and what is going on than anyone, he also has the greatest restraint than any of us. we can joke and make things up. the constitution requires that he acts responsibly. [laughter] especially on c-span. his expansiveness is because of his very special role. we will start by looking backward and start with same-sex marriage and we will talk about that. >> thank you for the gracious introduction. it is great to be back. i had a terrific time on this program last year. i look forward to our discussion and your questions at the end. as tom suggested, we thought, given the momentous character of the end of terms decis

the last decision the fcc did not appeal to the supreme court, but that was because they were working on this rule, which is now in court. they have used the outline they were given in that decision to formulate this rule, hoping that it would pass muster. if it fails, there's a good chance that it could go to the supreme court. >> we are talking with ed wyatt of the "new york times." you were in the court today. give us a listener's guide. what can they expect? >> there was very aggressive questioning from the judges, particularly of the fcc. the argument was supposed to last one hour. it lasted two hours, and a full hour of that was the judges, when the fcc lawyer -- the judges pummeling the fcc lawyer with questions of when this could or could not apply. you will hear the judges express some skepticism of verizon's arguments. i do not know if on the recording they differentiate -- you can tell who is speaking all the time, but it was a very lively argument. >> good morning. >> good morning. with the court's permission, i would like to reserve five minutes of my time. the decision w

court. meantime hernandez himself remains the focus of another police investigation. unsolved drive by shooting that took place last summer in boston. two men died in that one. as we told -- as we reported here days ago our fox news affiliate wtic in connecticut broke the story that authorities obtained surveillance video that shows aaron hernandez with those two men shortly before they were suddenly dead. molly line has the latest she is outside the courthouse in falls river, massachusetts. molly? >> shep, aaron hernandez glanced repeatedly at the people there in superior court to watch arraignment. among them, fiance, mother, and also the family members of the man he is alleged to have killed 27-year-old oden lloyd. and then hernandez went back to jail. lawyers did not argue for bail today. is he being held without bail and without prejudice. they could make argue for bail later date already being denied bail twice. here is what prosecutors said it b. it today. >> if you saw the last two b