>> commissioner wolfram? >> i guess, i have one sort of general concern, which is about integrity of kind of what is left, because pret where much and that is why i asked the question of whether he has actually visited the site, because i think that it is obviously a lot of damage and this work needs to be repaired and i am looking at the material and i am just wondering if it seems like pretty much everything is being replaced on the front, the doors, the windows, the glass blocks, the stucco, and so there is not everything is new and this building is 81 years old and we don't want it to look like it is brand new when it is all complete. i think that it is older and so even some of the things like the little side light windows on either side of the display windows is it necessary to replace those? are there some things that you could actually keep? the marquee? i am questioning the level of newness that is going to happen when this is all done? >> here in the back, was within five seconds of missing that mai

. >> thank you, commissioner wolfram? >> i have a question, for the project architect, just about the light sconce that was selected around at the front entrance and i may have missed the information about this, and it was based on the historical and can you tell me about the selection of that particular sconce and is that based on the other lights at the building? >> good afternoon, commissioners david wesle architecture resources group. commissioner wolfram, the light selection was based on the photographs of the similar buildings of the period but not an exact replica and so we chose something that was in the character of but it is not meant to be replication of what was there. it just, the thing that occurs to me is slightly odd is that you have this contemporary canopy and then this is historic and which, it just seems like maybe you just do a contemptary light. and some basis for it based on the building and i would be more comfortable and it just seems a little bit in conflict with the contemporary canopy. and i wo

matsuda. >> yes. >> pearlman. >> yes. >> commissioner wolfram. >> yes. >> and hasz? >> yes. >> and that passes 7 to 0 and if i might say that is just not my work it was the other people behind the scenes that work hard on these minutes and the format of the calendar. but i do appreciate that and commissioners item five, comments and questions. >> commissioner wolfram? >> i was wondering if you might consider the hearing and i will cancel, and we could attend the memorial which i think is at 2:00 p.m. that is just something for consideration. >> my comments. >> and comment echoed by commissioner matsuda. commissioner johnck? >> on a separate matter, do i want to comment on tim fry's report about the sunset survey and i did go to the walking tour on saturday, and was just totally enlightened by some of the fascinating works of art literally that are there in formed of the architecture and i encourage anyone to do that. and look forward to adopting the findings in september. any way, thank you. >> any other comments. >> seeing none. >> i move forward. >> just a matter o

. >> wolfram? >> here. >> hylan? >> here. >> commissioner johns. >> johnck, here. >> jo*ns. here. >> matsuda. >> here. >> and pearlman? >> here. >> first on the calendar is general public comment, at this time the members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except for the agenda item, your opportunity to address the commission the opportunity will be afforded when it is reached and each may address the commission for a three minutes. >> two speaker cards. >> yes, president, hasz, and members of the commission, first, thank you for having the note on your agenda that you will adjourn the meeting in memory of alice carry. and i think that you all know that alice was the preservation architect for this building and some of the other notes that have circulated around either by e-mail or in john king's obituary of her work. and but, i think that there are a couple of other things, that could possibly add to alice's story which are not known to most people. one is that it was

. >> wolfram? >> here. >> hylan? >> here. >> commissioner johns. >> johnck, here. >> jo*ns. here. >> matsuda. >> here. >> and pearlman? >> here. >> first on the calendar is general public comment, at this time the members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except for the agenda item, your opportunity to address the commission the opportunity will be afforded when it is reached and each may address the commission for a th. >> two speaker cards. >> yes, president, hasz, and members of the cothe noagenda that you will adjourn the alice carry. and i think that u all alice was the preservation architect for this building and arou either that by e-mail or in john king's obituary think that there are a couple of other d possibly add to alice's story which are not known to one is that it was mentioned by befoheat she had a became an archect. and i think that the med at number tabatha n, edth ienting t circular saw d when i don't shertegan an orgatiho io tenants or rin tin for i

. >> wolfram. >> yes. >> hasz *. >> yes. >> that passes 7 to 0. and in places you on item eleven, for case number 2013.1007u (david beaupre: 415-274-0539) pier 70 crane cove park, located at pier 70, assessor's block 9900, lots 068. informational presentation . >> good afternoon, commissioners. if i can get a motion. >> motion. >> and a second. >> okay. >> second. >> i am sorry i did not hear the motion. >> they recuse commissioner hylan. >> okay. and commissioner matsuda you are making the motion? and commissioner wolfram is seconding. >> on the motion to recuse >> hylan. >> yes. >> johns. >> yes. johnck. >> yes. >> pearlman >> yes. >> wolfram. >> yes. >> hasz. >> yes. so moved that passes unanimously. >> thank you, good afternoon, crai, the department staff and the item before you is a informational presentation on the park and i would like to introduce you to mark and david from the port of san francisco. >> good afternoon, commissioners mark piat, court preservation staff and i wanted to pass forward a letter march 5, 2013, from the architect

. >> wolfram. >> yes. >> hasz *. >> yes. >> that passes 7 to 0. and in places you on item eleven, for case number 2013.1007u (david beaupre: 415-274-0539) pier 70 crane cove park, located at pier 70, sessor's block 9900, lots 068. informational presentation . >> good afternoon, commissioners. if i can get a motion. >> motion. >> and a second. >> okay. >> second. >> i am sorry i did not hear the motion. >> they recuse commissioner hylan. >> okay. and commissioner matsuda you are making the motion? and commissioner wolfram is seconding. >> on the motion to recuse >> hylan. >> yes. >> johns. >> yes. johnck. >> yes. >> pearlman >> yes. >> wolfram. >> yes. >> hasz. >> yes. so moved that passes unanimously. >> thank you, good afternoon, crai, the department staff and the item before you is a informational presentation on the park and i would like to introduce you to mark and david from the port of san francisco. >> good afternoon, commissioners mark piat, court preservation staff and i wanted to pass forward a letter march 5, 2013, from the architect yo

commissioner wolfram? >> i think that we should acknowledge that the bricks are gone and approve the project the way that it is. >> i am sorry, i mean the bricks are not on the site, the secretary standard says that if the material is gone you can find replacement material. this is... we could be spending years looking for bricks. >> if that is a motion? >> i make a motion. >> i second it. >> any other discussion? >> so commissioners that motion is to approve with conditions? >> as in the draft motion? >> in the draft motion. >> as poe proesed by staff? >> yes, could i sign up for that because of all of the corrections. >> we have the corrections related to it. >> thank you for that. >> i agree to that modification. so just for clarity, commissioners that motion is to approve with conditions as proposed by staff and corrected and red into the record, yes. >> on that motion, commissioner hylan? >> yes. >> johns. >> yes. >> johnck. >> yes. >> matsuda. >> no. >> pearlman? >> this is a hard one, i am going to

. >> wolfram? >> here. >> hylan? >> here. >> commissioner johns. >> johnck, here.