sanchez and mr. stores both, and there is not a further process related to the subdivision map and i think that everybody agrees that process will land in front of the board of supervisors and so we just encourage you to continue the matter again, so that we have the opportunity to get the subdivision map approved to get an answer from the board of supervisors and the planning department on a no build continue before we are back in front of you >> how long do you think that this process will take? >> we are prepared to refile the application tomorrow and it will be for them to tell us how the city typically takes to process. and two months on top of that for an appeal. could i hear mr. sanchez what your time estimate is? >> generally, these matters can be dealt with fairly promptly and i mean that this is a simple referral from the department of public works i would want to add abundance of caution and take the materials and the history related to the case i would not want to approve it as soon as we

sanchez and mr. stores both, and there is not a further process related to the subdivision map and i think that everybody agrees that process will land in front of the board of supervisors and so we just encourage you to continue the matter again, so that we have the opportunity to get the subdivision map approved to get an answer from the board of supervisors and the planning department on a no build continue before we are back in front of you >> how long do you think that this process will take? >> we are prepared to refile the application tomorrow and it will be for them to tell us how the city typically takes to process. and two months on top

sanchez and mr. stores both, and there is not a further process related to the subdivision map and i think that everybody agrees that process will land in front of the board of supervisors and so we just encourage you to continue the matter again, so that we have the opportunity to get the subdivision map approved to get an answer from the board of supervisors and the planning department on a no build continue before we are back in front of you >> how long do you think that this process will take? >> we are prepared to refile the application tomorrow and

. >> have a seat, mr. sanchez. >> why don't we go to your office? >> well, my office is too small for the two of us. why don't we sit here. >> you know what? do what you want. whatever the [ bleep ] you want. i don't give a [ bleep ]. i say you're wrong. >> mr. sanchez, you know me. i've been here for 15 years. you know me. why are you talking to me -- >> do what you've got to do. >> okay? >> do what you've got to do. >> i'll tell you what i'm going i'm gonna sit over here, right next to you. together. we're going to go over this together. on august 20th of '06, you were placed interim level vi. in the policy, when you're placed interim level vi. >> what was i placed there for? >> this is the one where you assaulted that guy. were you in med-line or something like that? yeah, med-line. >> he had it coming. so this one has to be consecutive to the seg time you were doing here. it was, wasn't it? >> no. it's concurrent. >> no. policy says segregation is consecutive. this is my biggest concern, is this right here. is you're talking about 74 days. that'

last time, we didn't officially congratulate mr. and mrs. sanchez so congratulations on our baby boy. >> any public comment on item 2. seeing none, item 3 is the adaptation for the minutes of octobe october 23rd, 2013, >> i move to adapt. seeing none, on the minutes >> on that motion to adapt the october minutes commissioners (calling names) thank you. the minutes are adopted 4 to zero >> so 4a is withdrawn appeal vs. the planning department it's at 1815 protesting the issuance on july 29th to the 1815 stocking stone replace new stairs that you are this matter was continued to allow the opportunity for voting members to be present and it was continued previously to allow time for the planning holder to submit revised times they've done that. i'm wondering is there small business here for the permit holder? please step forward >> i'm marilyn. i'm a co- owner and a representative of the 1815 stockton street property. i'm also the permit holder and we respectfully request permission to replace in kind i understand that we meet the code requirem

sanchez's advice and meet and confer about the project and see if we could come to a agreement. these developers were willing to give a tremendous amount. they redesigned the neighborhood essentially to help the neighbors and these neighbors live there. doreen who teaches the dance class for my daughter lives next door and they made changes that were acceptable to these residents and mr. strickland who is a developer in town for a long time never been to a dr and john asked me if i would help him with it and reach out to mr. matchen and come to an agreement with the neighbor to the east. i have spoken with him numerous times. he is never available to meet at the site. he lives out of town and he was traveling so that was difficult. they didn't come to the pre-application meeting or the variance hearing so it's difficult to assess exactly what the complaints are. the primary first objection and one you heard again tonight is fire exiting, a claim over a proscriptive easement over the property and if you look at the letters sent in that mr. matchen sent to the dr and that's what t

mr. sanchez with the carpenter's union and first of all i want to say that san francisco is growing. and we need housing. and this building has all of the provisions of the general plan which is housing, and also, this project was approved by the board of supervisors and also by the planning commission. and so those folks they know what they are approving. also, if i am not mistaken, the objectives of the eastern neighborhood plan is to maintain a nice mix of neighborhood, and commercial. and this project has given us. and i think that the developer's goal is to improve the area. and make it a more friendly, so please, deny the appeal. thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please? >> mira, aliza and i am here to support the appeal for the project. and we are primarily concerned about precedent setting high limit ex-exception and shadows and traffic and parking in the area, potrero, avenue is incredibly crowded now and with the amount of development coming it is going to get worse and

mr. tea gues? >> good evening, again, planning department, staff, i believe that this is the first large project authorization that has been appealed in the board of appeals and so it may be good to just kind of give a brief on... the second one. >> it is the second one. >> corrected then. but still briefly, just for the other people in the room, so the large project authorization is a relatively new process and authorization within the planning code it was born out of the eastern neighborhoods planning process and rezoning, that happened and was finalized in 2008 and took effect in 2009. and it has specific thresholds and only applies in the eastern neighborhood, and it only applies to large projects as the name would indicate. and that is measured by any project that is going to be greater than 75 feet in height which this project does not meet or any project that is going to be a net, new addition of 25,000 square feet or more, which is what triggered this project to a large authorizat

mr. keplyn. >> we, the motion holder has 14 minutes since there are two appeals. >> good evening, commissioners my name is sufy and i was born in san francisco and raised across the street from general hospital, just blocks away from the proposed project. in the potreor hill district. i am one of the owners. along with my mom, dad and brother, and we are proud to come back and invest in our community with my family started their construction business over 30 years ago. there out an out reach project we made changes, we significantly increased the parking spaces from 38 to 49 and enlarged the bike spaces from 18 to 49 and decreased the number of residential units from 84 to 75, we agreed to install security cameras and motion lights to insure the safety of the neighborhood. we made revisions to the performer and on the comment including to but not limited to moving the main entrance south ward and centering it and providing set backs on the 5th and 6th floor that offer a build height of 40

. - senor sanchez. - mr. brashov. hombre. rosa says you are like a father to her. she is better than a daughter to me. i don't have to pay her bills. so, what brings you to the states ? rosa. actually, he's on his way to a conference in new york. in fact, we are only speaking english when miguel is here so he can practice. i have been in the states more than 30 years and he speaks better english than me ! come on in. carrie ? are you here ? i guess not. well, this is it. not exactly a palace but it's okay for now. - it's very nice. - how about something to drink ? water would be great. i brought something for you from home. miguel ! it's beautiful ! it belonged to my mother and to her mother before her. thank you. rosa, please sit down. there is something i want to talk to you about. now that i have finished architecture school-- - oh, hi. - [ rosa ] hi, carrie ! this is miguel. miguel, this is my roommate, carrie. - hola, miguel. ¿ como esta ? - good evening, carrie. i am feeling on top of the world. - you want to sit down for a while ? - i can't. you will never

but what we can say about mr. newman is that he was there as a tourist legally in that country. in palo alto, chris sanchez, nbc bay area news. >> what did sfo do right and wrong following the asiana crash this summer. today, results from a preliminary internal study on its disaster response. sfo gives itself high marks when it comes to commitment among first responders. the report cited good coordination with local hospitals and quick action to reopen the effective runways. but the report also points out the lack of a plan from ems responders from two different counties. the website crashed due to overwhelming traffic following the accident. >> we introduced social media three months prior to the accident, but we viewed it at the time as an accessory. after the accident, it really became the primary tool for us to communicate online information. >> indeed. the report also notes the airport's emergency alert system failed on that day, july 6. and it's being replaced byi rigt now. one thing not mentioned in the self-assessment, the fact that one of those killed in the crash died