say with the world bank and i.m.f. does this. much the same thing with their structural adjustment policies how are the vulture funds different. believe it or not the i.m.f. the world bank don't like these guys because they actually bust up the deals that the i.m.f. the world bank come up with so for example we've had massive debt forgiveness for nations like the congo in liberia all that done is allow these vultures to come in and seize the the assets that are there for example the case of the congo they were trying to ship cobalt. to to to europe and this was seize it's almost like somewhat legal piracy these guys are really scary they they take the resources these nation again i want to emphasize they don't do it just by buying up you know the technical means is that they buy a old bonds that are long forgotten by these nations that were issued before during the civil war a famine or some terrible event in which they pick up debt that's worth the paper is billions of dollars they pick it up literally sometimes for a

say what the world bank and i.m.f. does is pretty much the same thing with their structural adjustment policies how are the vulture funds different. believe it or not the i.m.f. the world bank don't like these guys because they actually bust up the deals that the i.m.f. the world bank come up with so for example we've had massive debt forgiveness for nations like the congo in liberia all that done is allow these vultures to come in and seize the the assets that are there for example the case of the congo they were trying to ship cobalt. to to to europe and this was seize it's almost like somewhat legal piracy these guys are really scary they they take the resources these nation again i want to emphasize they don't do it just by buying up you know their technical means is that they buy an old bonds that are long forgotten by these nations that were issued before during the civil war a famine or some terrible event in which they pick up debt that's worth the paper is billions of dollars they pick it up literally sometime

say with the world bank and i.m.f. . does this pretty much the same thing with their structural adjustment policies how are the vulture funds different. believe it or not the i.m.f. the world bank don't like these guys because they actually bust up the deals that the i.m.f. the world bank come up with so for example we've had massive debt forgiveness for nations like the congo in liberia all that done is allow these vultures to come in and seize the the assets that are there for example the case of the congo they were trying to ship cobalt. to to to europe and this was seize it's almost like somewhat legal piracy these guys are really scary they they take the resources these nation again i want to emphasize they don't do it just by buying up you know their technical means is that they buy an old bonds that are long forgotten by these nations that were issued before during the civil war a famine or some terrible event in which they pick up debt that's worth the paper is billions of dollars they pick it up literally someti

say with the world bank and i.m.f. does this point. much the same thing with their structural adjustment policies how are the vulture funds different. believe it or not the i.m.f. the world bank don't like these guys because they actually bust up the deals that the i.m.f. the world bank come up with so for example we've had massive debt forgiveness for nations like the congo in liberia all that done is allow these vultures to come in and seize the the assets that are there for example the case of the congo they were trying to ship cobalt. to to to europe and this was seize it's almost like somewhat legal piracy these guys are really scary they they take the resources these nation again i want to emphasize they don't do it just by buying up you know their technical means is that they buy a old bonds that are long forgotten by these nations that were issued before or during the civil war a famine or some terrible event in which they pick up debt that's worth the paper is billions of dollars they pick it up literally some

say what the world bank and i.m.f. does is pretty much the same thing with their structural adjustment policies how are the vulture funds different. believe it or not the i.m.f. the world bank don't like these guys because they actually bust up the deals that the i.m.f. the world bank come up with so for example we've had massive debt forgiveness for nations like the congo in liberia all that done is allow these vultures to come in and seize the the assets that are there for example the case of the congo they were trying to ship cobalt to to to europe and this was seized it's almost like somewhat legal piracy. these guys are really scary they they take the resource of these nation again i want to emphasize they don't do it just by buying up you know their technical means is that they buy an old bonds that are long forgotten by these nations that were issued before during the civil war a famine or some terrible event in which they pick up debt that's worth the paper is billions of dollars they pick it up literally somet

it's foreign policy establishment the creation of the the un in the world bank and in the i.m.f. all of that was the new world order after world war two to take the place of britain is the dominant power it was challenged unrivaled by the development of the socialist bloc and now that the socialist bloc has has been vanquished essentially in this global struggle the u.s. government is kind of finding its way about how to enforce its domination so it's concerned about china in that sense it's concerned about priscilla russia india the brics countries coming together in some way but fundamentally we're still in an era where the u.s. feels they can go on a role to destroy the anti colonial or or nationalist or independent governments that came to power after world war two because of their assistance the assistance military economic and diplomatic assistance they received from the socialist bloc that having been vanquished the u.s. is now in sort of this wrecking ball against those governments iraq libya syria it would like to do so. in oil rich regions but in the in the east asia yo

in the world bank and and the i.m.f. all of that was the new world order after world war two to take the place of britain is the dominant power it was challenged unrivaled by the development of the socialist bloc and now that the socialist bloc has has been vanquished essentially in this global struggle the us government is kind of finding its way about how to enforce its domination so it's concerned about china in that sense it's concerned about priscilla russia india the brics countries coming together in some way but fundamentally we're still in an era where the u.s. feels they can go on a role to destroy the anti colonial or or nationalist or independent governments that came to power after world war two because of their assistance the assistance military economic and diplomatic assistance they received from the socialist bloc that having been vanquished the u.s. is now in sort of this wrecking ball against those governments iraq libya syria it would like to do so. in oil rich regions but in the in the east asia you

world bank and in the i.m.f. all of that was the new world order after world war two to take the place of britain is the dominant power it was challenged unrivaled by the development of the socialist bloc and now that the socialist bloc has has been vanquished essentially in this global struggle the u.s. government is kind of finding its way about how to enforce its domination so it's concerned about china in that sense it's concerned about priscilla russia india the brics countries coming together in some way but fundamentally we're still in an era where the u.s. feels they can go on a roll to destroy the anti colonial or or nationalist or independent governments that came to power after world war two because of their assistance the assistance military economic and diplomatic assistance they received from the socialist bloc that having been vanquished the u.s. is now in sort of this wrecking ball against those governments iraq libya syria it would like to do so. in oil rich regions but in the in the east asia yo

world bank and in the i.m.f. all of that was the new world order after world war two to take the place of britain is the dominant power it was challenged unrivaled by the development of the socialist bloc and now that the socialist bloc has has been vanquished essentially in this global struggle the u.s. government is kind of finding its way about how to enforce its domination so it's concerned about china in that sense it's concerned about priscilla russia india the brics countries coming together in some way but fundamentally we're still in an era where the u.s. feels they can go on a role to destroy the anti colonial or or nationalist or independent governments that came to power after world war two because of their assistance the assistance military economic and diplomatic assistance they received from the socialist bloc that having been vanquished the u.s. is now in sort of this wrecking ball against those governments iraq libya syria it would like to do so. in oil rich regions but in the in the east asia yo

world bank and in the i.m.f. all of that was the new world order after world war two to take the place of britain is the dominant power it was challenged unrivaled by the development of the socialist bloc and now that the socialist bloc has has been vanquished essentially in this global struggle the u.s. government is kind of finding its way about how to enforce its domination so it's concerned about china in that sense it's concern about brazil russia india the brics countries coming together in some way but fundamentally we're still in an era where the u.s. feels they can go on a role to destroy the anti colonial or or nationalist or independent governments that came to power after world war two because of their assistance the assistance military economic and diplomatic assistance they received from the socialist bloc that having been vanquished the u.s. is now in sort of this wrecking ball against those governments arac libya syria it would like to do so. in oil rich regions but in the in the east asia you see

the i.m.f. and the cia and the world bank each publish a list of those countries this is measured on a per capita g.d.p. per capita basis adjusted for currency p.p.p. adjusted and in first place cats are in second place is luxembourg and then you have the likes of switzerland norway singapore hong kong if that counts the countries on that list and so on now some of these come through no is another one now some of these countries have got rich because of their oil but in that case why isn't saudi arabia on the list or why isn't russia on the list of venezuela saudi arabia by the way is twenty eighth so some of these countries are good because their oil some of the countries are going on the list because they have favorable legislation regulation which means people are they want to base themselves there or operate out of there they're very tax friendly and but these are all legislative and regulatory options that are available to other countries in the world they just haven't been adopted but the

the i.m.f. and the cia and the world bank each publish a list of those countries this is measured on a per capita g.d.p. per capita basis adjusted for currency p.p.p. adjusted and in first place cats are in second place is luxembourg and then you have the likes of switzerland norway singapore hong kong if that counts the countries on that list and so on now some of these come through no is another one now some of these countries have got rich because of their oil but in that case why isn't saudi arabia on the list or why isn't russia on the list of venezuela saudi arabia by the way is twenty eighth some of these countries are going there because their oil some of the countries are going on the list because they have favorable legislation regulation which means people are they want to base themselves there or operate out of there they're very tax friendly and but these are all legislative and regulatory options that are available to other countries in the world they just haven't been adopted but

the i.m.f. and the cia and the world bank each publish a list of those countries this is measured on a per capita g.d.p. per capita basis adjusted for currency p.p.p. adjusted and in first place cats are in second place is luxembourg and then you have the likes of switzerland norway singapore hong kong if that counts the countries on that list and so on now some of these come through no is another one now some of these countries have got rich because of their oil but in that case why isn't saudi arabia on the list or why isn't russia on the list or venezuela saudi arabia by the way is twenty eighth some of these countries are going there because their oil some of the countries are going on the list because they have favorable legislation regulation which means people are they want to base themselves there or operate out of there they're very tax friendly and but these are all legislative and regulatory options that are available to other countries in the world they just haven't been adopted but

seven days before the world bank and the i.m.f. moved in and effectively colonized the country was not palatable as an alternative but you can't really have an independent scotland with an english queen or u.k. pound still in nato and subject to american led military political decisions and of course also still be in the e.u. and subject to all the strictures that come with that if there is a yes in september what is the wisest case scenario if full the scottish economy. or the worst cases are race to the bottom that's the worst case for the working people at least arista the bottom provoked by a low tax low public expenditure for charite reagonomics regime in london forcing is scottish state to chase them all the way to the bottom to cut their taxes even lower to make the public expenditure even less to make even more people are employed and scotland would then be independent in the sense that it could fly zone flag from edinburgh castle but the standard of living of people on both sides of the border with virtually perpetual righ

seven days before the world bank and the i.m.f. moved in and effectively colonized the country was not palatable as an alternative but you can't really have an independent scotland with an english queen or u.k. pound still in nato and subject to american led military political decisions and of course also still be in the e.u. and subject to all the strictures that come with that if there is a yes in september what is the wisest case scenario if full the scottish economy. or the worst cases are race to the bottom that's the worst case for the working people at least arista the bottom provoked by a low tax low public expenditure for charite reagonomics regime in london forcing is scottish state to chase them all the way to the bottom to cut their taxes even lower to make the public expenditure even less to make even more people are employed and scotland would then be independent in the sense that it could fly georgia flag from edinburgh castle but the standard of living of people on both sides of the border with virtually perpetual r

seven days before the world bank and the i.m.f. moved in and effectively colonized the country was not palatable as an alternative but you can't really have an independent scotland with an english queen or u.k. pound still in nato and subject to american led military political decisions and of course also still be in the e.u. and subject to all the strictures that come with that if there is a yes in september what is the wisest case scenario if full the scottish economy. or the worst cases are race to the bottom that's the worst case for the working people at least a race to the bottom provoked by a low tax low public expenditure or thought your right reagonomics regime in london forcing is scottish state to chase them all the way to the bottom to cut their taxes even lower to make the public expenditure even less to make even more people are employed and scotland would then be independent in the sense that it could fly join flag from edinburgh castle but the standard of living of people on both sides of the border with virtually p

seven days before the world bank and the i.m.f. moved in and effectively colonized the country was not palatable as an alternative but you can't really have an independent scotland with an english queen or u.k. pound still in nato and subject to american led military political decisions and of course also still be in the e.u. and subject to all the strictures that come with that if there is a yes in september what is the wisest case scenario i have full the scottish economy. or the worst cases are race to the bottom that's the worst case for the working people at least a risk to the bottom provoked by illo to slow public expenditure or fracture right reagonomics regime in london forcing is scottish state to chase them all the way to the bottom to cut their taxes even lower to make the public expenditure even less to make even more people are employed and scotland would then be independent in the sense that it could fly zone flag from edinburgh castle but the standard of living of people on both sides of the border with virtually pe

seven days before the world bank and the i.m.f. moved in and effectively colonized the country was not palatable as an alternative but you can't really have an independent scotland with an english queen or u.k. pound still in nato and subject to american led military political decisions and of course also still be in the e.u. and subject to all the strictures that come with that if there is a yes in september what is the wisest case scenario if full the scottish economy. or the worst cases are race to the bottom that's the worst case for the working people at least a race to the bottom provoked by a low tax low public expenditure for charite reagonomics regime in london forcing is scottish state to chase them all the way to the bottom to cut their taxes even lower to make the public expenditure even less to make even more people are employed and scotland would then be independent in the sense that it could fly georgia flag from edinburgh castle but the standard of living of people on both sides of the border with virtually perpetua

seven days before the world bank and the i.m.f. moved in and effectively colonized the country was not palatable as an alternative but you can't really have an independent scotland with an english queen or u.k. pound still in nato and subject to american led military political decisions and of course also still be in the e.u. and subject to all the strictures that come with that if there is a yes in september what is the wisest case scenario if full the scottish economy. or the worst cases are race to the bottom that's the worst case for the working people at least arista the bottom provoked by a low tax low public expenditure fracture right reagonomics regime in london forcing is scottish state to chase them all the way to the bottom to cut their taxes even lower to make the public expenditure even less to make even more people are employed and scotland would then be independent in the sense that it could fly georgia flag from edinburgh castle but the standard of living of people on both sides of the border with virtually perpetua