we have to have a federal fallback kind of sort. house bill, federal exchange. news report says the white house approved the house bill and that's where the final bill was going to go. there was going to be a house senate conference like we usually have and that would be the law enacted. the senate bill was the senate's negotiating center. the state exchange oriented induced states rather than federal exchange negotiating a draft. problem is and michael is responsible for this slide. then there was this. scott brown is elected in massachusetts. there were no longer 60 votes in senate, no longer enough for a house senate conference bill. the choice at that point became a bill that a lot of people didn't like. the president said there were things he didn't like. letter of 51 health policy experts urging the house to act said a lot of things in bills we don't like. they're imperfect. the choice is clear. pass it through the senate bill, and improve through reconciliation. other limitations of the senate bill can be addressed through other means. to read the full bi

it's really about the question of federalism and what is left of federalism if the federal government with has the ability to regulate states under their taxing authority? so with that question, i think i'll conclude by saying, you know, it is the obligation of states to check the federal government. i often complain that we've not done enough. we often accept federal funds and essentially have sold part of our sovereignty, and we complain about the strings, but we have entered into a deal with a sovereign and are subject to the rules and regulations. i do think that it's time that states do more in the role of checks and balances that our constitutional authors thought we would play. and, again, i can complain that we no longer have the ambassadors of our states in the world's greatest deliberative body, but i do think without a senate that will check the federal government on behalf of states, it's going to be left to attorneys general and our state governments to do more in terms of being sovereign and challenging the acts of our federal sovereign friends when they get out of line.

>> state and federal legislators? >> no, the california senior legislature. >> wait a minute, elected officials and senior legislators. >> california. >> in california. >> senior legislature. that's an entity by itself and they are elected. >> okay, let me see can i get this correct with your help, madam secretary, we'll get this wording correct. could you read that to us? i'll read it and then you can read it back to me, what i have. this committee shall review and propose the adoption of local, state and federal legislation to the commission for approval. it shall propose letters to the mayor, board of supervisors, state and federal legislative committees and departments, state and federal legislators and elected officials and california senior legislative committees's clients on behalf of das and its clients and constituents of san francisco. did i get that? >> yes. >> did i get that right? i have a lot of scratching going on here. okay, did we hear that? did i get it right? >> uh-huh. >> all right, okay, could i h

start with the federal judge. i just think that's a smart move by anybody in my position. >> are you going to practice in his court? >> you never know. >> something that is incredibly inspiring. what i wanted to ask you, how much thought you are giving to the institutionalization of the ractices and programs? so often receive these types of programs are led by people like you, very smart and charismatic. but then the u.s. attorney comes or next administration comes, attorney general and some of the programs or the perspective that they are important get washed away. this is money because then having people specifically designated to do those types of things become important. i wonder as you are sitting there and some of you who have done this in the past i do not think focused on that. when i was attorney general in connecticut we did a lot of what you're talking about. some published i was a smart as you are to do some of the things you are doing but never thought about institutionalizing it in a way that's anoth

state exchanges are federal fallback. house bill federal exchange. news reports say the white house very much approve the house filamentous where he was going to go. they would be a house-senate conference like we usually have a dataflow enacted. the senate bill was the senate's negotiating position. the state exchange oriented induce state rather than exchange negotiating rounds. the problem is on the side, scott brown is elected in massachusetts. they're no longer six tivos. no longer enough votes for a house conference bill. the choice at that point became a bill a lot of people didn't like. the president said lots of things he didn't like. 51 health policy experts urging the house to act on a lot of these things in the bill we don't like. the choice is clear. pass the senate bill. other limitations of the senate bill can be addressed through other means if you read the full bill, what they meant was not administrative fiat, but this will cause democratic congress in 2010 we will build a fix that legislatively. but everyone understood this though

. >> we give the floor to the representative of the russian federation. >> thank you, mr. president. first, i would whole up on colleagues of the security council to not turn this to a farce. we carefully listened to the briefing of the ang on political issues. we thank you for the information. thank the chief monitor of the osce as well as the representative of the chairperson officers. we were interested to see the evaluations of those directly working on the ground. every day, we make efforts to settle the situation in the east. however, we think bringing international players to security council members, is not totally appropriate. it distracts them from their direct obligation and politicizes practical activities. invitation ise confirmed by what we heard statements today by a number of council members we used our platform and osce representatives not for seeking a solution to the ukrainian crisis but for another foray into propaganda with new flourishes. the situation remains tense of course. the cease-fire regime is not fully being compliant with the withdrawal of h

. >>> still ahead, should the federal reserve change the way some central bank officials are appointed? we'll talk to the head of one group who says yes. >>> this was supposed to be a turnaround year for xerox but the company projected flat revenues for 2014 and lower than expected earnings for next year. speaking to analysts in new york, ursula byrnes told me thinks will look better next year. >> i am very confident we can grow. we have a great client engagement. i'm very confident on our growth. >> xerox also announced an expansion of a stock buyback plan to $1.5 million and the stock rose more than 1%. >>> coming up tomorrow, we'll have more of my interview with ursula burnes. she talks about her take on the economy, hiring and tax reform. >>> ford's big bet with big pickup trucks is rolling off the assembly line and into show rooms right now. the new "f" series, a bit of a gamble with its aluminum panels and fuel economy that is expected to be far higher than what we've traditionally seen with pickup trucks. phil lebeau has details. >> reporter: this is as big as it gets at ford mo

a state is not federal government, right? >> a state is not the federal government. >> stephen: okay, thank you for being here. thank you so much. diwin? did i just win? >> no, you didn't win, because the irs is the agency who has the power to interpret the law upon. i know it's not your favorite agency -- >> stephen: it's no one's favorite agency. >> it's still the i.r.s.' job, and the i.r.s. says we're reading this law as a whole coherently. in context, it is clear that state exchanges set up by the federal government-- they're still state exchanges-- can still give people these subsidies. courts are supposed to defer to agencies, the i.r.s.' reading of the law, mott naik it up themselves. >> stephen: so let's just imagine for a moment that the whistling past the graveyard you're doing will not work. >> okay. >> stephen: >> stephen: they rule in favor of the people who say you can't get money through the federal exchanges. what happens to the law then? >> the law could go into a death spiral, as you were saying before, beca

expenditures since the authority had more than 500,000 of federal expenditures during this past year, the u.s. department of transportation requires that we perform additional compliance tests work on the authority's management and control activities, and we also issued and did not have materialal weaknesses or any other findings over the compliance to report as well. >> >> the second report is the report to the finance committee and under the professional standards we are to provide, the oversight bodies with information on the following seven items as listed in the slight prepttation, and this is included in the report to the committee. as related to the aspects of the accounting practices the authority was required to implement the renewed accounting standards this past year and these new standards did not impact the authority financial statement of the presentation, and the authority also changed the revenue recognition of the period from 120 to 90 days to conform with the city's change and the other communications are nothing out of the ordinary and we did not encounter any diff

entre tanto la seÑora amaya quien se presenta junto a sus hijas una orden federal en virginia el 6 de noviembre dijo cÓmo fue el terreno que caminó. >> como era tarde, el camino estaba muy resbaloso. >> asÍ mismo dijo que estuvo detenido en un centro de procesamiento de la patrulla fronteriza durante cuatro dÍas ahora que las temperaturas han descendido los voluntarios que brindar asistencia a las familias inmigrantes en el sur de texas les suministren suficiente abrigo. para muchos el destino final es el norte de los estados unidos. pedro rojas, univisiÓn. >> las protestas por la desapariciÓn y presunta muerte de los 43 estudiantes la escuela normal de ayotzinapa en guerrero, mÉxico se siguen agudizando conatos de violencia producto de la ira y el descontento con el gobierno federal. entre algunos manifestantes vandalizan propiedades pÚblicas otros prefieren protestar de manera pacÍfica, pero firme maría antonieta collins tiene lo Último. >> guerrero en llamas claman titulares. se refieren a la violencia de manifestantes ayer tocÓ al congreso de guerrero en chilpancingo c

that the federal government had very limited power. one of the patterns i found doing the book is how many historians dismiss these presidents as weak and ineffective. i do not see them that way. found is they would take very strong stands at political risk. there is van buren taking a fairly strong plan -- stand and having to deal with the political consequences. had he been craftier, he would have figured out, let's figure out a way to appease everybody politically. he was willing to take the heat for doing something because of the constitutional principle. when the federal problem persisted, he was going to be the person blamed for it and he took the blame. >> our next failed president is william henry harrison. opportunity.ted in those 31 days, he contribute it something important, which was a growing resistance of congressional supremacy. tell us about that. least remembered? a great and strong candidate, he was the first candidate not meted for president -- nominated he is the first whig president. harrisontation is that would be

that case is the subject of ongoing federal investigations. eric holder spoke to the same point today. >> emphasize that we have two investigation ongoing. the department's investigation will continue to be thorough. they will continue to be independent. and they remain ongoing. >> at the height of the protests in ferguson after the shooting in august, one thing that seemed to bring a measure of calm, restore a sense that system was finding a resolution to the situation was a visit by holder to ferguson at the height of the protests. it was during that visit when calls started coming from the community, community leaders on the ground there that the federal government should be stepping in, the federal government should be taking over the prosecution in the michael brown case because of the lack of trust in local authorities in ferguson, in st. louis county to handle the case. that lack of trust that local authorities could handle this fairly did not just come out of nowhere last night after the grand jury made the announcement. the calls for

the first one is what explains enlarging of the federal court system in the united states. and away from state courts and the area of criminal law in the keys of dempsey and the most important question, can civil rights organizations impact the the better development of the american states? as it stands most civil rights scholarships pink the naacp has focused on legal victories. this is a wellborn narrative of the naacp in the american imagination right now. today is to bring good decision in brown vs. board of education is the most well-known supreme court case public opinion poll after public opinion poll reveals this. many of us who follow civil rights know the naacp was very active in housing discrimination lawsuits and voted disenfranchisement cases. one of the contemporary legal political leaders who megan ming francis this sentiment, barack obama while a state senator remarked on a radio show, quote, one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement was a supreme court focused. there was a tendency to lose track of the political

it's a federal question. they are not going to get to that but you're asking us to invalidate this conviction on the basis of federal law and it seems to me we can not do that unless there has even -- even if there has been a violation of the fourth amendment the remedy must be exclusion of the evidence. that's a federal question. i think we're going to have to decide it. if we send it back to north carolina, they're not going to decide it. are they? >> no, i don't believe they would or should. but i -- just f the state adopted a rule saying we're going to have a more favorable jurisprudence of constitutional error and give automatic new trial, the court wouldn't be prohibited from decide ago constitutional issue and sending it back down to the state. the retroactivity sphere, "dan forth v. minnesota" the court has said that courts can simply deal with the federal question. >> there's no question that if north carolina applied a state constitutional analog to the fourth amendment they could have a more extens

a senate bill said state exchanges will have a federal fallback. house bill federal exchange. news reports that the white house approved a house bill and that was where the final bill was going to go in there would be a house-senate conference that we usually happen that would be the law that would be enacted. a senate bill was the negotiating position. the state exchange oriented rather than federal exchange negotiating draft. the problem is then there was this. scott brown is elected in massachusetts. there were no longer 60 votes in the senate and no longer enough votes for a house-senate conference bill. the choice of that point became a bill that a lot of people didn't like. the president said there were lots of things he didn't like and 51 health policy experts saying there were a lot of things in this though we don't like. the choice is clear passed the senate bill and reconciliation. other limitations of a senate bill can be addressed through other means. what they meant was not -- what they meant was this will cause democratic gains in congress in 2010 and then we wil

>> i lie the federal highway system. that is the greatest achievement in the last century. >> what are you saying? the states can handle this? new jersey is broke. the transportation fund is broke. >> because you spend more money than you take in and you have other things. >> chris christie refuses to raise the gas tax and instead, let me finish my point, instead the sketching accounting. >> why do you keep interrupting charlie who keeps interrupting you? >> come down here. let's duke it out. >> why doesn't texas have a big infrastructure problem. >> very good point at the beginning. we know this abuse and fraud and mismanagement and money going to the wrong places. the federal government is the place this is done. a good deal of that money is going to get to the desired purpose. i just think it's time we stop with that. i think it's time we sort of re-examine the books, follow the procedure and account for the 53 billion that's gone missing. we are not to roads and bridges. >> we could do that. more money is going to be

do you favor changing federal law? >> i think that is an issue that is important to work with tribes, the state. the department of justice, the federal government. there are some acts -- the village safe families act -- the department is to looking at that issue. one thing i haven't focused on it my career was working in the rural communities, going out to the world communities, recognizing we have challenges and taking action. under governor parnell, we recognized dramatically increase law enforcement in the rural communities. we did that. we have been increasing that. we almost triple the numbers of the last five years. we celebrate examples. we need to do more. the key is having tribes, the state, and the feds working together on these issues, and building capacity. >> the question was about tribal authority. you think they should have the authority under their own power? the authority to issue domestic violence restraining orders against non-members? >> the state is already enforcing those orders. the state attorne

you don't think you can do much at the federal level. what they did is essentially pass a law that involves the creation of what is called an independent treasury, not the same thing as we have today and it didn't do much to relieve the depression and therefore he got voted out of office because he backed failed policies. >> so it's not a modern view of power. the jacksonians of van buren believed in a strong presidency but not a strong federal government. >> right. >> and the w.i.g.'s believed in a powerful congress. >> right. >> but also a constrained congress as well. >> right. and also they believed in a weak president. so in a sense they were very much the inverses of each other. so the w.i.g.'s would have preferred a very strong policy coming from congress and the president simply to do what congress wanted. that's not going to work out either. but with van buren, you've got somebody who turns out to be, to believe in a very modest role for dealing with financial matters. and to some extent there are still folks that believe that.

federal jurisdiction. professor clinton, welcome. [ applause ] >> while we're getting the power point set up, i want to thank kevin and susan for involving me in this project and the wonderful staff of mmia for all of the hospitality and all of the help on both the essay in the book and on the project. it's a little difficult to follow this under tester and washburn this morning, but nevertheless, i'll try. what i'm going to try to do with you for the brief time i have available is to do a 400-year historical survey about indians and indian treaties and to try to put them in some perspective. some of which assistant secretary washburn has alreadied a -- already averted to. sort of tempting to think that somehow europeans brought treaties to north america, but in fact, that's not true. we know if you think about it that at the time of first contact, there was a rich set of tribal alliances, tribal negotiations, intertribal relations between the original native occupants of north america. in fact, if you thi

of federal matters. i thought they would be moore natural allies to -- would be my natural allies, don't mess with any local jurisdiction. yes, even here in the district of columbia. in july the district's marijuana decriminalization bill took effect. i should note that the district passed medical marijuana earlier, one of the strictest laws -- with one of the strictest laws in the united states. our council has shown it knows ow to handle these issues. the threat that has been made is to use our local budget. now, if you want to know what is our local budget doing here? talk about $6 billion raised in the district of columbia locally by -- from business -- businesses and residents. it comes here again because of that anomally. although district got home rule 40 years ago, there was still the obligation to bring your balanced budget here where there is no balanced budget, so the congress can pass off on it. it's almost resulted in a closed -- shutdown of the district of columbia more than once. it's been

, violations of federal laws. that's our bedrock principle and something we take very seriously every day. buttoned that, that's just -- buttoned that, that's one leg of the three-legged stool. the other legs are -- 95% of people sent to prison think come home to their home communities at some point if and if we don't figure out a way to reduce recidivism rates we won't make communities safer. a shift away from convictions and length of sentence to, is the community you're serving more safe today because it's your turn on the watch? in north dakota, i worked with my colleagues to developpen antiviolence program for american anyones in our state. i looked at my role as improving public safety, way struck at the time at the daunting crime problems that face american indians who live in reservation communities. when you think of the fact that a native american female baby in her mother's arms, has a one in three statistical chance of being sexually assaulted sometime in her lifetime, that's public safety problem that

it's a federal question. they are not going to get to that but you're asking us to invalidate this conviction on the basis of federal law and it seems to me we can not do that unless there has even -- even if there has been a violation of the fourth amendment the remedy must be exclusion of the evidence. that's a federal question. i think we're going to have to decide it. if we send it back to north carolina, they're not going to decide it. are they? >> no, i don't believe they would or should. but i -- but just if a state had adopted a rule saying we're going to have a more favorable jurisprudence of constitutional err and give automatic new trials, the court wouldn't be prohibited from deciding a constitutional issue and sending it back down to the state. the retroactivity sphere, danfor the versus minnesota is another case where the court has said that states can choose for themselves to have more favorable remedies and the court simply keels with the federal question. >> there's no question that if north

while the federal appeals and post trial motions were limiteded to federally originated cases habeas petitions can be in state or federal courts. before a petitioner can file in a federal court all state options must be exhausted first. the state originated decisions we saw the study were exclusively habeas petitions and they were now seeking a remedy in state court. the over well ing majority of decisions in in the study were habeas petitions and appeal s. the fact that we have both federal and state originated decisions in this study means the trends we see operating in the study sample are by no means limited to just federal cases. >> of course it means those folks who were litigating initially in the state case never got relief on the state side before it got to the federal court. i'd like to direct a question and ask for the purpose of this question to look at it from your defense lawyer perspective. one of the really astonishing findings was that in '64 out of 65 cases with late disclosure there was no relief granted. when you have that kind of case law you have lawyers decidin

the act makes a theft of trade secret a federal crime. the tool thieves use in their attempts to steal american trade secrets are growing more sophisticated by the day, however. our laws must keep pace. the eea, as a criminal statute necessarily has limitations. while we're very much appreciate the cooperation we get from federal law enforcement agencies, the fbi and department of justice have limited resources at the time and will never be able to prosecute all cases. state trade secret laws developed and made as soon as at a time when misappropriation was largely a local matter. but for it to deal with state lines, the array of state laws is inefficient and often inadequate. it's also inconsistent with how other forms of intellectual property are protected. trade secrets are likely to involve movement across state lines. this is particularly true when the theft is by an individual looking to flee the country. once a trade secret has been divulged trade secrets may be lost forever and the harm from disclosure and is very often irreparabl

what is interesting about the federal government, the federal government can do a whole lot. it's just in our own times we live in an age where there is the most economic inequality in american history since the gilded age in the late 19th century the age of the rockefellers and the vanderbilt, these titans. what the federal government can do when we think about ferguson would be whether it's a great society or an urban renewal program. what's interesting is that what impact white americans as well and latinos. the reason why i say that as americans we should think about black equality because even the new deal and great society because of institutional racism black equality was not actually achieved even though there were these huge federal mandates. in 2014 because we are aware of racial injustice we should have huge federal programs that achieve things of social justice for everyone. i think the federal government can do a whole lot not just for black equality but just for poverty in the united states. >> guest: i'm going to agree with that but let's take a it a step furth

we said that night that we wanted the federal government to come in. that sunday we had a unity rally where thousands came and joined us. we repeated it, and all the way think the funeral. hahs night, the appearance by the district attorney made it clear to everyone why we had little faith in the state prosecution. i have been involved in civil rights all my life. we have seen cases go ways that we felt were right, and ways that we felt was wrong. i have never seen a prosecutor, hold a prez conference to discredit the victim. >> where he went out of his way to go point by point, in discrediting michael brown jr., who could not defend himself. how do you in explaining why you are not indicting a man to kill, try and convict a young man for shoplifting, that can't explain the tape, try to convict him for interfering in the miscar when you don't hear his side of the story. have you ever heard a prosecutor go in a press conference to explain to the prez, why the one that did the killing, is not doing to trial? but the victim is guilty of several things tha

fox 29 dave schratwieser live at the federal courthouse in center city tonight. dave? >> iaian, delvin barnes back behind bars tonight at the federal detention center right around the corner from the courthouse here. he will remain there until a hearing on friday when prosecutors are expected to ask a judge to keep him behind bars until his trial on kidnapping charges. accused kidnapper delvin barnes whisk into court to face federal charges one week after leading authorities on a frantic search up and down the east coast. he face add judge in federal court where he now stands charged in the abduction of 22 year old carlesha freeland-gaither. >> won't comment at this time, because it is an ongoing investigation. >> prosecutors refuse comment after the hearing, barnes was brought back to philadelphia to face charges that he violently abducted gator off the street in germantown, ten days ago, then fled the area. he made stops to use her atm card at a maryland bank there is nearby gas station convenience store. surveillance video went out across the country last wednesday

the federal city today sits on native homeland. when i am thinking about reclaiming, i'm thinking about reclaiming homeland territory, essentially. however, throughout the 19th and 20th centuries as washington became the federal city, native diplomats and delegates from communities across the country as well as residents, people who came here to live and maybe work as lobbyists, even, claimed parts of the city as their own and marks them as indigenous in a number of different ways. i think this is important because it does a couple of different things. in terms of thinking about urban history, it complicates our story. i thought for a long time that the ways in which we conceptualize native history and urban history are separate. native history is taking place and going on and then at some point it stops and there is a gap. urban history starts. there is no meeting point between the two. in reality, i think we understand that that is not really accurate. that is what our popular culture, even our academic studies have suggested. in

the first is the possibility of federal so for its charges. -- federal civil rights charges. that investigation is proceeding. be attorney general has set it up to be independent of the local investigation. it is an investigation into the possibility of a federal charge that would require the government to show officer wilson shot michael brown with a specific intent to use more force than reasonably necessary under the circumstances. that is a fairly difficult standard to satisfy. not impossible, but difficult. general gave no suggestion of one that investigation might be complete . you never know where an investigation might lead. that is the first investigation people think about. the second is a civil investigation. that means it would not result in putting anyone in jail. but it could result in significant reform of the ferguson police department. it will look at whether ferguson has engaged in a pattern of practice of violating individuals' federal rights. that can include a wide range of activity. from the way the ferguson police department uses force, how they train o

to comply with a federal dictate, in keeping with the nature of federalism and the sovereignty of my client, i thought it was better to challenge in advance, and again it's not a challenge over all of obama care, which as it's been kind of labeled, but it really reflects the fact that whether the federal government can require an employer under their taxing authority to be subject to the same dictates as trp under the commerce clause as originally written. so the $56 million threat of the state is a tax penalty that i didn't want to wait to have to defend, i thought i would bring in advance. state is really the intergovernmental tax immunity that we have lived with as part of our federal society and the sovereignty of each. i have joked among our legislators, and some of them didn't think it was a joke, but i have talked about if there was a tax penalty, we could have a 100% reciprocal tax. if you think about it, if we're going to break the deal between the sovereigns of intergovernmental tax immunity, that the federal government has the tax penalty authority, does that mean the stat

but it's 100% federal funding, where the federal government only funds 10% of our -- of our schools. and the penalties for not taking the federal orders for what your personnel practices ought to be are much more severe in the senator from pennsylvania's bill. he causes you to lose 10% of your -- of your school funding under th.under the child care dt block grant, you'd lose 5% of the federal funding. but the issue remains the same and it's a good issue. i mean, i hear it on our committee. the senator from rhode island is on that committee and he's heard senator harkin and me argue about this. you can make a very good argument to say, we provide some money; therefore, we ought to write some rules. so we're going to write the rules for personnel practices. we're going to write the rules for academic standards. that's called common core. we're going to write the rules for qualifying how teachers should be evaluated. we're -- even in our preschool programs, we're going to say what the rules are for class size and length of the school day. and that all sounds very good here. but then whe

theow you don't want federal government involved, but what can the federal government help you do to improve education in indiana? >> my first year in congress, even though it was president bush's top priority at the time, i was part of a group that opposed no child left behind because i believed in and now that education is a state and local function. say resources, not red tape. if you want to block education resources to allow the state of indiana to craft new solutions -- in indiana we are committed to career -- making career vocation and high priority. when i became governor, our legislation took a hard look at me an core, and they sent bill and we became the first act illegally withdraw from common core. processto the arduous of writing our own standards. i really believe, the principle of who decides is extremely important. the government that governs least governs best and those things most important to us, education and public safety in the health and welfare of our people ought to be accountable at the closest level to the people. i think that republicans do well to assert

and we not only have federal officials former federal officials part of this dialogue. we have someone from the new york city mayor's office, engaged with an ambassador in el salvador, opened an office in texas. gives you a flavor for the broad spectrum of individuals, of organizations, that really play a role in this critical, critical issue. i have three personal experiences that really inform my vision of being the director of uscis. first of all, you heard as part of my bio that i'm son of cuban immigrants, the grandson of turkey and poe la fleeing anti-semitism. because of those experiences, i understand the aspect of immigration based on seeking refuge. fleeing a situation that has become in some way no longer tolerable and coming to where the situation can be better. miami i grew up, although born in brooklyn, i actually grew up in miami, the miami of my childhood really provides a case study, not just in what it means to be seeking refuge, but also in what immigrants do for america, this point i was talking about immigrants are good for america. and the miami of

for the federal exchanges. and, again, as i said when we started. the cbo clearly interpreted the law as requiring subsidies for the federal exchanges. so the case is just kind of overwhelming which again leads you to the conclusion. what the conservatives are trying to do here is got the most activist effort we have seen since bush v gore. there is no, there are very, very few people in the legal community who are kind of not vested in this case who believe this case has much merit one way or the other. >> after big complicated bills like the affordable care act and like many rather small bill, we always, at some point, soon thereafter, pass something that they call technical corrections. and this was done constantly and routine bills as julian knows, passing through both bodies, and they recognize that there would be drafting errors in legislation, interpretation complications at the agencies, and they needed to technically correct the legislation. and very commonly, technical corrections bills would get vote

do you favor changing federal law? i think that is an issue that is important to work with tribes, the state. the department of justice, the federal government. acts -- theme village safe families act -- the department is to looking at that issue. one thing i haven't focused on it my career was working in the rural communities, going out to the world communities, recognizing we have challenges and taking action. parnell, weor recognized dramatically increase law enforcement in the rural communities. we did that. we have been increasing that. numbers ofriple the the last five years. we celebrate examples. we need to do more. thekey is having tribes, state, and the feds working together on these issues, and building capacity. >> the question was about tribal authority. you think they should have the authority under their own power? the authority to issue domestic violence restraining orders against non-members? >> the state is already enforcing those orders. the state attorney general's office, the prosecutor's, they are

the federal clinics are going to be cut back. if you want to pay out of pocket at an urgent care center, that is fine. it is interesting to see how contradictory and divided it is. practitioners going to become more -- nurse practitioners going to become more? guest: oh yes. physician assistants is one of the top jobs. because of the shortage of primary care doctors, there is going to be such a need for these kind of people, particularly in rural areas, but just anywhere. for basic things. host: have you noodle the round on healthcare.gov to see about buying? guest: i browsed around and it is a lot more user-friendly this year. i tried last year and i could not get on at the beginning. it is not orbitz or any of these other sites where we buy airline tickets or anything like that. it is starting to get better. this is such an important decision and you need to be able and see if the doctors .nd hospitals so many of these people have never had insurance. they don't understand that there is often cost-sharing involved. host: jayne

. >> host: when did she start with the federal government? >> guest: a series of wonderful accidents. her photographic studio was in san francisco. said she would take photographs her clientele were wealthy but she would look out the window to see homeless people living on the streets and begging and soup kitchens. so she decided to start these photographs because her friends like them. they were in the oakland california gallery and that exhibit was seen by a man who would become her husband , of very straight economist professor at university of california berkeley and he thought they were sensational. he hired her for a program for the stated california to help the agricultural migrants. then he took her photographs to washington d.c. to the department of agriculture where they had started a small photographic project and they took one look at those and hired her on the spot. he thought that she had to work. in 1936 she began to work for the federal government for a project known as farm security. >> host: how long will she with them? >> g

i contacted the federal bureau of investigations who referred me to the federal trade commission. i'm not sure what they have been able do about it. i have some suggestions about what prepaid debit card companies could do to protect consumers which i hope to get into later on. thank you for listen to me and giving me this opportunity to testify. >> thank you. you are very courageous to come and share this with us. mr. rupy? >> chairman nelson, ranking member collins, members of the committee, thank you for giving me the opportunity to appear before you today. my name is kevin rupy and i serve as vice president of law and policy at u.s. telecom. u.s. telecom and our member companies share the committee's concern about the problems associated with phone-based imposter scams targeted at seniors. calls using voice overinternet protocol or voip technology when combined with caller formal working group focused on creating a secure caller i.d. for v.o.i.p. calls. the secure telephone identity revisited group has been working since then to achieve this goal. despite challenges, stake hold

the federal government offers a lot of flexibility for borrowers, in particular those who don't have high salaries. so there's been a lot of back and forth between the c.f.p.b. and private lenders. in addition, from the private lender side, what we have started hearing is that there have been a lot of internal discussions at banks about how do we increase loan revenue going forward? if we alienate student borrowers, people who are right now in their 20s and early 30s, down the road when it comes time for them to get a mortgage or when they're looking to establish some type of banking relationship, we might not get those borrowers. they might go somewhere else. >> sreenivasan: right, right, right. so marian, put this population in perspective for us, because as she mentioned, the federal loans have already been doing some of this in the past. and how much can an average kind of borrower save if they qualify for this modification, do you think? >> well, just to give a little more context, the pool of private student loan borrowers is vastly outnumbered by the pool of federal student lo

of federal laws. that's our bedrock principle and something we take very seriously every day. that's one leg of the three-legged stool. the other legs are -- 95% of people our offices send to prison think come home to their home communities at some point if and if we don't figure out a way to reduce recidivism rates we won't make communities safer. a shift away from convictions and length of sentence to is the community you're serving more safe today because it's your turn on the watch? in north dakota, i worked with my colleagues to develop an antiviolence program for american indian reservations in our state. i looked at my role as improving public safety, way struck at the time at the daunting crime problems that face american indians who live in reservation communities. when you think of the fact that a native american female baby in her mother's arms has a one in three statistical chance of being sexually assaulted sometime in her lifetime, that's public safety problem that the u.s. attorney shou