and good luck with your appointing, mta board member lee. on the bus, and on the train, glad you came today. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> my name is mike young and i live in park measure said. in the short time i have known lee, i found him to be a man of intelligence, integrity and generosity. he shares his knowledge freely and when i ask him a request about issues in the neighborhood, i know i'll get an objective and balanced response. one that has been considered and seen from all sides. and he always responds to me within 24 hours. i think lee would be an addition to the board and to the mta board of directors and a citizen of san francisco. he's the kind of representative i would want on the board. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. at this time, any other members who wish to speak on item 3, come forward. seeing none. public comment is closed. colleagues. supervisor mar. >> i did want to respond to a couple of things mentioned about the leadership of mr. lee. i think the point made by somebody about supervisor yee's

and good luck with your appointing, mta board member lee. on the bus, and on the train, glad you came today. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> my name is mike young and i live in park measure said. in the short time i have known lee, i found him to be a man of intelligence, integrity and generosity. he shares his knowledge freely and when i ask him a request about issues in the neighborhood, i know i'll get an objective and balanced response. one that has been considered and seen from all sides. and he always responds to me within 24 hours. i think lee would be an addition to the board and to the mta board of directors and a citizen of san francisco. he's the kind of representative i would want on the board. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. at this time, any other members who wish to speak on item 3, come forward. seeing none. public comment is closed. colleagues. supervisor mar. >> i did want to respond to a couple of things mentioned about the leadership of mr. lee. i think the point made by somebody about supervisor yee's

and good luck with your appointing, mta board member lee. on the bus, and on the train, glad you came today. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> my name is mike young and i live in park measure said. in the short time i have known lee, i found him to be a man of intelligence, integrity and generosity. he shares his knowledge freely and when i ask him a request about issues in the neighborhood, i know i'll get an objective and balanced response. one that has been considered and seen from all sides. and he always responds to me within 24 hours. i think lee would be an addition to the board and to the mta board of directors and a citizen of san francisco. he's the kind of representative i would want on the board. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. at this time, any other members who wish to speak on item 3, come forward. seeing none. public comment is closed. colleagues. supervisor mar. >> i did want to respond to a couple of things mentioned about the leadership of mr. lee. i think the point made by somebody about supervisor yee's

it is a effort by mta, pda and department of public health. we are loorking to [inaudible] insure vision zero is data drirfben i using the most timely data to inform initiatives and make sure what we are doing works. our comprehensive surveillance system will be launched later this year that links police data with hospital data to better understand and capture injuries including the cyclist that are missed in police data. >> good afternoon, mari hunter from mta. i'll go through the last few slides quickly. as mentioned, we had the 24 projects in 24 months we were able to complete 30. we reached the target over 13 miles of treatments on the high injury corridors. we have the level of coordination we are working to make that more robust but we have established meetings with agency tooz insure we are most cost effective with our investments. finally, working to improve that awareness and as you -knowledge of the type of treatments we are doing, again so people better understand the trade offs. with key treatments that might take away space for pa

and i am joined here today by the project manager for this project from the mta. the radio project is intended to modernize the system, the systems that are in place now are 30 years old and as you know, in this age in which technology becomes obsolete, muni is forced to be working with the technology that is for the 70s. and the project is a lot more than just radio. the video, is treated in the back bone, but it is used to overlay transportation systems such as the vehicle, health monitoring and the vehicle locater and incident management and then such that are intended to improve the service and the defend bltd of the system. the project is being delivered by the sample contract. which was award inned 2012. to the heritage corporation. and right now, the project is in the study and the investing stage and that testing is under way. and they are hoping to start with the vehicle equipment installation in june. and those vehicles will start in september. and finally, the fleet, will take place between january and march. the budget as we see here is $126 million. a

is guarding the gates of hell and what is the remedy it would seem appropriate to break up the mta in order to help the problems where each division can be addressed mta is too large and it catches up the things that return to hiding we have to terminate mta and relegating to the administration both sides history i modest add that last night i walked home from chris i didn't field $2 million to the bus stop i hope that is not the mta version of walk san francisco thank you thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> next is (calling names) the last person to submit a card. >> good afternoon. >> how many minutes. >> two. >> our clock is still not working tom our first impression two januarys ago did uber drivers said are you charged $5 and day and they said no director reiskin kind of end that policy we don't know from the mayor know knows about first impression i'm on your side okay rattles the rattles are getting - the labor union should be talking about this to you, you guys the rattles are all around the front cage of the directives on the 67 and 72 and include the seats for the cheers

i live in a neighborhoods where the mta monopolizes 3 blocks of parking near the bus depot and mta workers idle their cars-talk about a environmental issue, they idle while they wait for the previous shift to vacate the parking places so they can then pull into what are public parking places so they have taken all the public parking around the bus depot off the market. the city of san francisco guards its own parking stock, the only other agency in the city of san francisco that has the right to build its own parking is uc and what does uc do? they build parking on their propertys. i live next to mission bay. uc built high rise parking structures on that property. why? because they acknowledge the quality of life and ability to hire people for their hospital requires that they be able to ride in their own vehicles to a neighborhoods that is completely underserved by public transportation and park vehicles to care for people in their mission to provide health service. they acknowledged that they have a problem. it is called, parking and their solution is build parking and lots of it. our ci

and i am joined here today by the project manager for this project from the mta. the radio project is intended to modernize the system, the systems that are in place now are 30 years old and as you know, in this age in which technology becomes obsolete, muni is forced to be working with the technology that is for the 70s. and the project is a lot more than just radio. the video, is treated in the back bone, but it is used to overlay transportation systems such as the vehicle, health monitoring and the vehicle locater and incident management and then such that are intended to improve the service and the defend bltd of the system. the project is being delivered by the sample contract. which was award inned 2012. to the heritage corporation. and right now, the project is in the study and the investing stage and that testing is under way. and they are hoping to start with the vehicle equipment installation in june. and those vehicles will start in september. and finally, the fleet, will take place between january and march. the budget as we see here is $126 million. a

and good luck with your appointing, mta board member lee. on the bus, and on the train, glad you came today. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> my name is mike young and i live in park measure said. in the short time i have known lee, i found him to be a man of intelligence, integrity and generosity. he shares his knowledge freely and when i ask him a request about issues in the neighborhood, i know i'll get an objective and balanced response. one that has been considered and seen from all sides. and he always responds to me within 24 hours. i think lee would be an addition to the board and to the mta board of directors and a citizen of san francisco. he's the kind of representative i would want on the board. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. at this time, any other members who wish to speak on item 3, come forward. seeing none. public comment is closed. colleagues. supervisor mar. >> i did want to respond to a couple of things mentioned about the leadership of mr. lee. i think the point made by somebody about supervisor yee's

is guarding the gates of hell and what is the remedy it would seem appropriate to break up the mta in order to help the problems where each division can be addressed mta is too large and it catches up the things that return to hiding we have to terminate mta and relegating to the administration both sides history i modest add that last night i walked home from chris i didn't field $2 million to the bus stop i hope that is not the mta version of walk san francisco thank you thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> next is (calling names) the last person to submit a card. >> good afternoon. >> how many minutes. >> two. >> our clock is still not working tom our first impression two januarys ago did uber drivers said are you charged $5 and day and they said no director reiskin kind of end that policy we don't know from the mayor know knows about first impression i'm on your side okay rattles the rattles are getting - the labor union should be talking about this to you, you guys the rattles are all around the front cage of the directives on the 67 and 72 and include the seats for the cheers

please consider this before approving this as revised by the mta. this slide accommodates different ways of traveling and remains voracious- >>i know everyone has been patient here but- >>okay thank you. >>thank you next speaker please. >> on march 14, 2006 17 foot cork oak there planted on venice street. i live on venice street. the tree it was dedicated for civil rights by the near rosa park.the significant of rosa park is a raised in rosa park did not move. this is an un-just act. trees deemed unfeasible this will affect the visual aesthetics of our neighborhood to the point of alienation. instead of cultivating and preserving the healthy trees and shrubs that we have for days to come the plan will create enormous sums of money to reestablish that which cannot be replaced. this will dispose of our own urban forest history and replace it with a toxic option. please redirect funds to the restoration of the historical light post and the maintenance of the roads and the existing trees along the end a highway 101 corridor and beyond thank you. >>[time

the mta, muni arts used to have a. it changes a little bit but it's still parking all around it from aldie for their employees to part. they're taking care of themselves, not taking care of their customers. the residence. what kind of job is out there? muni has increased the number of riders in san francisco every year. but the percentage of riders to the increased population has gone down for the last 20 years. we haven't done a good job. at all. we need more parking. all they have to do is change their policy. we have the bike lane think it we identified three spots for parking. here's a parking lot. build up. absolute refusal. the parking lot is still there just build up from it. thank you >> thank you. anymore public commons? comments? seeing none, public comment is closed. again i'm not lashing out to us individuals and regardless of the comment not lashing out to the mta. a must out at the institutionalization of the problem. we need to break this logjam in the only way to do it not to the methods been proposed b

the public utilities commission, the mta. together, were working really hard to deliver the projects that make a difference for the people of san francisco. we have some projects in the works and now and those are the result of some of the capital planning also. my cell street is being done. potrero right there thereby the new hospital that's being done right up to ocean avenue is being done and coming soon, we have a lot more. we have second street. second street is going to be an entire new design with nice bike pathways among nice sidewalks where people can walk, and really achieving the type of streetscape that offers twice the sky city like san francisco should have. today, were paving the street that was last week caved in 1989. the payment was given score was 1500 at the end of today this pavement score will be 100. 100. that's what were doing. were going all around the city and paving streets. this year, our goal was to pave 600 bucks and were already at 639. we've exceeded the number of blocks that were plan. so i'm

on the mta said, a lot of these functions were performed by my team at the mta, but now it's up to motivate to perform these functions. but we spent a lot of time last year working on contacting and we served out largely a coronations and review quality assurance, quality control and support for the station design an outreach from my group is in charge of all of the permitting which sounds very simple, but nothing is simple. in san francisco. so where's you might be able to get a station permit in a daze in summer like not san jose might take 90 days in san francisco. there's a lot of stuff level review and intra-agency review and intra-agency review and ultimately a series of permits will be issued to motivate to deploy the equipment on the street. so, right now were in the process we've chosen the locations for the 60 or 70 new stations in the first wave were beginning to review the first designs have entered into our approval process and ultimately will be issuing permits the summer. and into the fall. then, also on outreach, that's primarily motivates response ability, but we have a lot

on the mta said, a lot of these functions were performed by my team at the mta, but now it's up to motivate to perform these functions. but we spent a lot of time last year working on contacting and we served out largely a coronations and review quality assurance, quality control and support for the station design an outreach from my group is in charge of all of the permitting which sounds very simple, but nothing is simple. in san francisco. so where's you might be able to get a station permit in a daze in summer like not san jose might take 90 days in san francisco. there's a lot of stuff level review and intra-agency review and intra-agency review and ultimately a series of permits will be issued to motivate to deploy the equipment on the street. so, right now were in the process we've chosen the locations for the 60 or 70 new stations in the first wave were beginning to review the first designs have entered into our approval process and ultimately will be issuing permits the summer. and into the fall. then, also on outreach, that's primarily motivates response ability, but we have a lot

the mta, muni arts used to have a. it changes a little bit but it's still parking all around it from aldie for their employees to part. they're taking care of themselves, not taking care of their customers. the residence. what kind of job is out there? muni has increased the number of riders in san francisco every year. but the percentage of riders to the increased population has gone down for the last 20 years. we haven't done a good job. at all. we need more parking. all they have to do is change their policy. we have the bike lane think it we identified three spots for parking. here's a parking lot. build up. absolute refusal. the parking lot is still there just build up from it. thank you >> thank you. anymore public commons? comments? seeing none, public comment is closed. again i'm not lashing out to us individuals and regardless of the comment not lashing out to the mta. a must out at the institutionalization of the problem. we need to break this logjam in the only way to do it not to the methods been proposed b

diane hammond sf mta. the item before you is a amendment to division of the six san francisco transportation go to england the provisions of golf on your bill 114 which authorize local jurisdictions to bourbon street of penalties committed by his effort failed to yield for an elderly person or person with disabilities. on any public transit the. the webex also recommends not nonsubstantive amendments deleting outdated references and language to comply with existing law. this change allowed transit violations issued to be processed in the same manner that parking tickets and existing transit polish a prostitute removes him from the court system and also allows them to protest and paid it much more flexible manner with eliminating the requirement for protest. pending approval of this legislation, the sf mta board is approving and 70 signs at $56 effective july 1 which is 50% of the funds for adult transit violations. i'm happy to answer any questions >> thank you. i don't see any questions or so far. alex: n

for fiscal year 2016-27 and the mta is budgeted to receive $286.3 million in general fund support. taxpayer money, our money. the resolution: whereas, the sfmta 84 program is responsible or transit related projects citywide, whereas community for project has been swamped over negative impacts on mission street such as merchant difficulty in getting deliveries, patients not able to shop locally and the climbing customer base, as people decide to avoid going to shop in the mission altogether. whereas, you need for design for lombard yuri venice california geneva etc. and stockton were potentially. negative impact similar to mission street where is the proposed muni for design for-potentially great negative impact similar to those on mission street, whereas the sfmta's budget is supplemented by general fund monies, whereas the board of supervisors has control over appropriating general fund monies to the sfmta, getting john such year-where's the board of supervisors has the ability to place general fund money on reserve that are allocated to the sfmta eight during the city budget and

the mta, muni arts used to have a. it changes a little bit but it's still parking all around it from aldie for their employees to part. they're taking care of themselves, not taking care of their customers. the residence. what kind of job is out there? muni has increased the number of riders in san francisco every year. but the percentage of riders to the increased population has gone down for the last 20 years. we haven't done a good job. at all. we need more parking. all they have to do is change their policy. we have the bike lane think it we identified three spots for parking. here's a parking lot. build up. absolute refusal. the parking lot is still there just build up from it. thank you >> thank you. anymore public commons? comments? seeing none, public comment is closed. again i'm not lashing out to us individuals and regardless of the comment not lashing out to the mta. a must out at the institutionalization of the problem. we need to break this logjam in the only way to do it not to the methods been proposed b

is there a representative hear from the mta to address this item? >> staff: annette williams. before you today is a new contact or paratransit services will provide door-to-door transportation for people with disabilities unable to use muni. for the past 35 years, and i note you been here for many of those years, and contacting san francisco paratransit services and we went through a competitive bid for this new contact. when out in november with drs p and we had an evaluation made up of panel of disabilities and seniors and experts and paratransit that a valuate of the proposal. were their recommendation, mpa staff negotiated a contract with-for a five-year period and five-year option. some of the new things in this contract are mobility management activities. we are going to revenue information and referral center for seniors and people disabilities to tell them about all the transportation options that there are in san francisco. we are also going to expand the travel training program for people who may not have use the system before and could benefit from that. we also hav

i live in a neighborhoods where the mta monopolizes 3 blocks of parking near the bus depot and mta workers idle their cars-talk about a environmental issue, they idle while they wait for the previous shift to vacate the parking places so they can then pull into what are public parking places so they have taken all the public parking around the bus depot off the market. the city of san francisco guards its own parking stock, the only other agency in the city of san francisco that has the right to build its own parking is uc and what does uc do? they build parking on their propertys. i live next to mission bay. uc built high rise parking structures on that property. why? because they acknowledge the quality of life and ability to hire people for their hospital requires that they be able to ride in their own vehicles to a neighborhoods that is completely underserved by public transportation and park vehicles to care for people in their mission to provide health service. they acknowledged that they have a problem. it is called, parking and their solution is build parking and lots of it. our ci

and good luck with your appointing, mta board member lee. on the bus, and on the train, glad you came today. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> my name is mike young and i live in park measure said. in the short time i have known lee, i found him to be a man of intelligence, integrity and generosity. he shares his knowledge freely and when i ask him a request about issues in the neighborhood, i know i'll get an objective and balanced response. one that has been considered and seen from all sides. and he always responds to me within 24 hours. i think lee would be an addition to the board and to the mta board of directors and a citizen of san francisco. he's the kind of representative i would want on the board. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. at this time, any other members who wish to speak on item 3, come forward. seeing none. public comment is closed. colleagues. supervisor mar. >> i did want to respond to a couple of things mentioned about the leadership of mr. lee. i think the point made by somebody about supervisor yee's

the board of supervisors then sf mta. since we're the newest commission we're third in line for broadcasting at the same time on tuesdays. we will follow-up. we will work and follow-up with sf gov and follow-up with mr. james as well. >> okay. >> next item, please. >> the next order of business ten, closed session. no closed session items. the next order of business is item eleven, adjournment. the mee>> the meeting is adjourd 2:15. thank you. >> the office of controllers whistle blower program is how city employees and recipient sound the alarm an fraud address wait in city government charitable complaints results in investigation that improves the efficiency of city government that. >> you can below the what if anything, by assess though the club program website arrest call 4147 or 311 and stating you wishing to file and complaint point controller's office the charitable program also accepts complaints by e-mail or 0 folk you can file a complaint or provide contact information seen by whistle blower investigates some ex

i do not sf mta wants to comment. they're very broad and we funded short-term bicycle parking through tfca a couple times in the past. a lot of times [inaudible] around town be funded through this project >> mostly like emergency bikes? >> yes. small businesses and things like that. any other questions? >> colleagues, any questions or comments? we will move on to public comment. anyone wishing to comment on item number seven? >> supervisor, my name is nick just afterwards. i'm a director of the [inaudible]. i guess hereto come talk to in favor of the data passed allocation out of the funding. i think it's incredibly exciting, 73% of the sf voted for this. the taken action into their own hands by imposing a small fee on themselves just to help make that transportation option incentivize cleaner and transportation options make transit more affordable for students and it something that we support overwhelmingly at bart and we think it's highly good program i could get rolled out another universities across the region. in

for example, mta conducted a pilot similar to not technology in one year reduce collisions by 50%. i want to thank the advocates who have the support of this legislation, including lot sf but by coalition the and vision zero coalition. i would also like to thank my staff, erika mae born, we saw this legislation through. now, what i'd like to mention here is that we are not including law enforcement officers at this point because there was some details to be worked out and i didn't want to start this process anymore for the rest of the fleets, but rest assured, i will be working with the-our city administrator google come up with airport in the next few months so we can move forward to include the law enforcement officers in this particular item. to follow legislation should it's critical we work towards our vision zero goals by changing our culture to smart and proven policies and to our language and how we speak about our goals. so, this is the reason i am making a motion for two minor amendment. you have a copy of that and that will be better aligned. these basically are minor la

. >> the voters made the changes to the set aside and last year late last year the mta board and the board of supervisors approved the transportation sustainability fee that brought residential development and essentially go significantly increased the amount of revenue dedicated to transportation infrastructure that capitalized from new development that is happening and increased by more than 60 percent over the old transit development fee that was itch more narrowly focused so with those additional funds this is a lot more we've been to chip away at the deficit that the task force identified the prop a the goading go bond was organized and focusing on the reliability of street safety the blue on the chart shows the first issuance of the bonds that was done last year and from that some of the projects that i've talked about today that you've approved over the last year and including some have gone into the ground are market-rate on the streets in terms of physical improvements on the streets to reduce the relays and increase muni and more buses we're enjoying and the funding for cal

their own by the mta but we can look into this with the vehicles. >>thank you. >>thank you supervisory yee. can we take this item colleagues, same house same call? the item passes unanimously.item 35 >>mme. clerk. >>item 35 is aan ordinance amending the administrative code to allow persons receiving tenant-based rental assistance under the federal housing opportunities for persons with aids (hopwa) program to be eligible for protections against rent increases. >>for long-term survivors of hiv. and for reasons that no one can remember these survivors are no longer covered under rent control.hopwa recipients has we recently learned have no such protection.we saw that this hopwa recipient did not receive rent control and lo and behold no one why this was not in there. we workaids program as well as with other associations and we all agree that this will protect the hopwa recipients. long-term survivors and those living with aids in the city including seniors. these residents of our city have been to hell and back.they have suffered with their health for so many yea

their own by the mta but we can look into this with the vehicles. >>thank you. >>thank you supervisory yee. can we take this item colleagues, same house same call? the item passes unanimously.item 35 >>mme. clerk. >>item 35 is aan ordinance amending the administrative code to allow persons receiving tenant-based rental assistance under the federal housing opportunities for persons with aids (hopwa) program to be eligible for protections against rent increases. >>for long-term survivors of hiv. and for reasons that no one can remember these survivors are no longer covered under rent control.hopwa recipients has we recently learned have no such protection.we saw that this hopwa recipient did not receive rent control and lo and behold no one why this was not in there. we workaids program as well as with other associations and we all agree that this will protect the hopwa recipients. long-term survivors and those living with aids in the city including seniors. these residents of our city have been to hell and back.they have suffered with their health for so many yea

which oversee real estate entitlement and includes planning, qc, mta wreck-park and the court. we have under the direction of these commissions as well as ultimately the board. we have no independent authority to move approved a ba outside these commissions were the other respective departments. under the city's administrative court the planning commission is a regulator da. we take all of our da to the planning commission. i think one question that's raised is how would this commission not be duplicate of of the efforts of the planning commission and other? one recent example was the approval 5m which was the development agreement it was approved as you know supervisor earlier this fiscal year and was heard more than 10 times as six different boards and commissions. dozens of community meetings. what additional oversight is missing i think your question supervisor tang what additional oversight is missing this mission can provide? we be interested in hearing that. additionally come i do one appointment that some potential conflicts that what the proposals and focus on housing

we as the mta cannot control how much parking is being put into buildings. as i said, we have to deal with it. after the building is there than the neighbors say, hey, kathy alonso permits because of our park in the street. were left with the top job of rough fine refereeing a finite amount. as chairman dwight said were turning that curb into bike lanes,, at such. day lighting is pressuring. if you just log parking spaces but exactly saving some lives. makes it less likely someone scored to be powered into somebody at an intersection. so it's a trade-off. safety for parking. well we got before you is how do you help us slice the pie. we've only got as much parking and the dogpatch we are working with neighbors there some of the residents want more parking for residents. some businesses were more parking for businesses. we have allow for visitors. we have to allow for firemen. it allow for everybody wants some of that parking we can't make work her. we just can't make more curb. that's a problem we have with you tonight >> of a couple of follow-up questions j

two part composition defined by the masonry peers the corn news will - to accommodate the exciting mta entrance at the southwest corner the walled and ceiling had been reclad as part of project and also new signs for the retail tenant will be installed the proposed project was reviewed by the arc on december 22nd the comments from the arc are include in our packets in response to the arc the building is top-heavy the height of the second floor has bhnl increased by two feet and the cornice was combaeshgd those helped the bulk above the windows and make the top of this more propositional the simplification of the palates for smooth finished terracotta and one tenant per facade staff finds the continues are conditions will be in compliance with the secretary of interior standard the property design is comparable with the character of the surrounding district and particularly in its proposed massing and composition, scale, detailing and orientation and staff preliminarily recommendations for this project is perusal with conditions staff recommends 3 conditions of approval in your packet w

tim with the mta. thank you for setting that up. so, we applied for the city grant under some specific criteria to try to get through the initant of how it can move out to have the most sustainable and equitable transportation system. [inaudible] resulted in what we call a binary policy system that is incompetable with cities gruth not just in san francisco but many cities around the country. that system has resulted in people who are choosing to are required to use a [inaudible] in the city are [inaudible] 80 percent empty, there are 4 empty seats that utilized and most of the times the car is stationary so need a place to park and most the cars are privately owned so it is creating a economic burden on people to get around the city with private transportation. because of the design the city and transportation system we have enormous peaks in the morning and evening which creates a large demand on the transit supply but for the rest of the day it isn't very utilized. it is efficiency issue as well. in the mean time we had a plethor

i do not sf mta wants to comment. they're very broad and we funded short-term bicycle parking through tfca a couple times in the past. a lot of times [inaudible] around town be funded through this project >> mostly like emergency bikes? >> yes. small businesses and things like that. any other questions? >> colleagues, any questions or comments? we will move on to public comment. anyone wishing to comment on item number seven? >> supervisor, my name is nick just afterwards. i'm a director of the [inaudible]. i guess hereto come talk to in favor of the data passed allocation out of the funding. i think it's incredibly exciting, 73% of the sf voted for this. the taken action into their own hands by imposing a small fee on themselves just to help make that transportation option incentivize cleaner and transportation options make transit more affordable for students and it something that we support overwhelmingly at bart and we think it's highly good program i could get rolled out another universities across the region. in

a $25 million designated [rao-efrbg/] d reserve for the mta is reasonable considering the $200 million reserve being requested for the police department. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good morning, supervisor. my name is maria gegan and i am a member of the board of directors for senior and disability action and also very proud to be standing with the budget justice coalition. i was sitting in chambers and i was recalling two things about my past career with city service: i started out in senior information and referral. and i remember feeling very positive and good about a lot of calls where we could help people and provide them with referrals that they -- services that they needed. one distressing call that would come through though was from those folks just above medical-level, where they weren't able to qualify for in-home support services. but were clearly in need of that in order to remain independent and at home, like most of us would want. and it was very distressing because the only option was for private pay, which even though they had a little bit more in

is the planning commission or were mta? was can be working with them? >> testifier: just to clarify, on-site means not on-site at the city. >> director raphael: clear-cut to check in with them on an 18 month basis? >> testifier: the key months is after the building comes occupied we would do an 18 month check-in and then it's once annually. even more robust. the word wicks has three potential fees. the first fee is about an application fee when a person that their plan. that fee will cover the staff time of reviewing the plan and the pre-occupancy compliance check. the ongoing annual compliance check will also have an annual fee. that will cover the administrative cost of that as well. you are absolutely correct that over time, as more and more projects come on, you potentially could need more and more staff, but we also think we will probably learn from the program and might need less staff time per project overtime. that happened in other jurisdictions that we appreciate. >> testifier: what we built in as an incentive, both for developer and to suppor

is there a representative hear from the mta to address this item? >> staff: annette williams. before you today is a new contact or paratransit services will provide door-to-door transportation for people with disabilities unable to use muni. for the past 35 years, and i note you been here for many of those years, and contacting san francisco paratransit services and we went through a competitive bid for this new contact. when out in november with drs p and we had an evaluation made up of panel of disabilities and seniors and experts and paratransit that a valuate of the proposal. were their recommendation, mpa staff negotiated a contract with-for a five-year period and five-year option. some of the new things in this contract are mobility management activities. we are going to revenue information and referral center for seniors and people disabilities to tell them about all the transportation options that there are in san francisco. we are also going to expand the travel training program for people who may not have use the system before and could benefit from that. we also hav

the public utilities commission, the mta. together, were working really hard to deliver the projects that make a difference for the people of san francisco. we have some projects in the works and now and those are the result of some of the capital planning also. my cell street is being done. potrero right there thereby the new hospital that's being done right up to ocean avenue is being done and coming soon, we have a lot more. we have second street. second street is going to be an entire new design with nice bike pathways among nice sidewalks where people can walk, and really achieving the type of streetscape that offers twice the sky city like san francisco should have. today, were paving the street that was last week caved in 1989. the payment was given score was 1500 at the end of today this pavement score will be 100. 100. that's what were doing. were going all around the city and paving streets. this year, our goal was to pave 600 bucks and were already at 639. we've exceeded the number of blocks that were plan. so i'm

>>i would have to refer to mta staff to talk about the construction timeline. >>i think it said were talking about taking out 86 trees? >> we're taking out 84 median trees andfor sidewalk trees. >>these are directly attributable to the installation of loading, pass and massing. the sidewalk- so whenever there will be a large city project the city is not going to ignore the sidewalk trees so we say what we have out there in terms of street trees and then we do this for every project we walk it and we determine what trees are out there and what condition they are in. so we identified 106 sidewalk trees that we thought were in poor condition or not likely to survive the impacts of construction. at this point we killed off that decision and we have really focus the mta moving forward with the project itself. we did also talk about street tree removal at that hearing that decision will be released very soon. we didn't want there to be two decisions that had to be appealed simultaneously. the key project here is the van nessbus rapid transit that is the key focus her

please consider this before approving this as revised by the mta. this slide accommodates different ways of traveling and remains voracious- >>i know everyone has been patient here but- >>okay thank you. >>thank you next speaker please. >> on march 14, 2006 17 foot cork oak there planted on venice street. i live on venice street. the tree it was dedicated for civil rights by the near rosa park.the significant of rosa park is a raised in rosa park did not move. this is an un-just act. trees deemed unfeasible this will affect the visual aesthetics of our neighborhood to the point of alienation. instead of cultivating and preserving the healthy trees and shrubs that we have for days to come the plan will create enormous sums of money to reestablish that which cannot be replaced. this will dispose of our own urban forest history and replace it with a toxic option. please redirect funds to the restoration of the historical light post and the maintenance of the roads and the existing trees along the end a highway 101 corridor and beyond thank you. >>[time

r mar icky m artin uib l pub lic oo o vi informacion en pantalla( mta n mientras tanto, el ton jo nhn e sc i escrib io o e n t witter ... y es parte de la reaccion de psersonas reaccionando a lo qu h ha ocurrido, esto masacre tiene lugar en el mes delorgullo gay e en laos angeles adutoridades h e exteremado messedidas de seguriy el arresto de un hombre en santa moica que dijo que quiereria ha daÑo. >>> la policia de santesta monia detuvo a un hombre armado den denetdentro de un auto y que se dirigia al f festival del orgullo gay . >> no hay una conexion entre los o dos incidentes. >>> la ciudad de laos angeles esta en alerta maximaxima, per a rastreadoares entre ellos encu encubiertos supervisan el paso d de los contingntes, se garnat o garnatizgarnatizo seguridad duanrante marcha de 1 autos conmemorativos,stansestam una situacion de alerta para c cualquier cosa que sucesuceda d dia, colores que espaÑarepresen orgullo ondean por todos a party jarline se manifseto cnonsternaa y pide a dios que alunoguno de conocidos no hayan fallecido. >>> bien triste . >>> en esst fiesta con testa f

for example, mta conducted a pilot similar to not technology in one year reduce collisions by 50%. i want to thank the advocates who have the support of this legislation, including lot sf but by coalition the and vision zero coalition. i would also like to thank my staff, erika mae born, we saw this legislation through. now, what i'd like to mention here is that we are not including law enforcement officers at this point because there was some details to be worked out and i didn't want to start this process anymore for the rest of the fleets, but rest assured, i will be working with the-our city administrator google come up with airport in the next few months so we can move forward to include the law enforcement officers in this particular item. to follow legislation should it's critical we work towards our vision zero goals by changing our culture to smart and proven policies and to our language and how we speak about our goals. so, this is the reason i am making a motion for two minor amendment. you have a copy of that and that will be better aligned. these basically are minor la

right now, maybe this is not a question for you, but for san francisco, is under mta? the taxis? >> correct. >> and where are they? the staff? in regards to this particular legislation? >> they have, they have the city does not have an official position on this yet, but they have expressed to the author, concerns and requests for technical corrections that they think will better safe guard san francisco, but i think that given the fact that even the california puc has said that they don't have the resource to do this and i think that everyone is pushing them to not rush to get it done this month and let's have a longer discussion and i think that sfmta is working with them, and even without the advocacy platform. at least working on technical corrections that will provide more protections for our regulations. >> okay, thank you. >> thank you. >> i see no other questions, thank you. >> is there anyone from the public that would like to speak on this item? >> seeing none, public comment is closed. and there is a recommended action on this item or mr mr. stamos. >> unless the commit

track we met with mta to determine from their proclamation staff to constituted u shut down a line if there is 2 inches of water from the track has 3 inches of water the track will be shut down and look at the sovereignty or society impact whether the value of sometimes time sitting on the track or can't get to work for productivity, etc. >> so in the in the interest of time skill the more detailed slide and jump to the economic impact it is comprised of 13 issue areas when i mentioned the muni tracks i got to transportation in traffic and got to potential business effects but a whole host of other economic impacts the four that the right hand column shows you the economic impact shows the significance from high to low and the four that are marked as high account for 90 percent of the total monetary dollars noticing percent of dollars are for the city's high impact categories the relative impacts here is not an dictation of the importance for example, public health department shows the low impact that means that we talked and met with public health department to identify the process t

the puc will make investment jz water system and sewer system and our pawer system and mta that will be improving transit and making sure the city is safer and longer last aing and includes funding for some 30 vision zero projects that total $70 million. we want to come pleat the vision zero projects and make sure the goal is met in 2024 so this budget will do that. we'll also have something we are experiencing in the mission and that is a much more cultural effective response and prevention and too the fire squz anything that will destroy affordable housing so we have within this and again thank you to the leadership of tom howee and building inspection collaboration with the fire department to insure education in the communities where fires seem to be still ones that we want to prevent from happening that will have a comp tent response making sure that all of the residents and building owners have a higher level of safety for these very valuable historic buildings and buildings that are housing a lot of affordability at this time. those are the sro's and the low income apartment bu