>> supervisor peskin: i the motion to send this to the board >> supervisor peskin: motion to the send this to the full board with a recommendation. without objection, that will be the order. >>[gavel] >> supervisor peskin: please read the next item >> clerk: item number three 81 examining the administrative codes require housing platform to residential unit is on the city registry prior to listing. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. we've been joined by the chief sponsor of this orbix david campos and i want to thank supervisor campos for his leadership on this issue as well as the coalition of housing advocates, homeowners, tenants, public safety advocates, hotel workers, the hotel council, the apartment association, the tenants union, for lending their support to this very reasonable and long-overdue piece of legislation intended to fix some of the loopholes in my predecessors well intended but yet evolving and still flawed legislation around short-term rentals. with that, but he turned it over to supervisor campos >> supervisor campos: thank you. much mr. chairman. i want to thank yo

. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. after that, [calling names] >> testifier: good morning, supervisor name is charlie work on government affairs for the san francisco apartment association. thank you for hearing us today. we represent about 3000 property owners from the immense about 70,000 rent-controlled apartments citywide. we ask that you support the legislation here before you today and also the full board of supervisors. the main thing the legislation does is all the platforms themselves accountable for registration. the same weight hurts is allowed to make sure the card about a register with the dmv. we believe this to be the smartest, easiest and effective way of cracking down on the bad actors were both landlords and tenants while allowing home sharing to continue in the framework of the existing law. the requirement told by forms and honorable to only list registered units was a primary recommendation of the planning department staff last year. the planning commissioner has called it the linchpin of successfu

>> supervisor peskin: i the motion to send this to the board >> supervisor peskin: motion to the send this to the full board with a recommendation. without objection, that will be the order. >>[gavel] >> supervisor peskin: please read the next item >> clerk: item number three 81 examining the administrative codes require housing platform to residential unit is on the city registry prior to listing. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. we've been joined by the chief sponsor of this orbix david campos and i want to thank supervisor campos for his leadership on this issue as well as the coalition of housing advocates, homeowners, tenants, public safety advocates, hotel workers, the hotel council, the apartment association, the tenants union, for lending their support to this very reasonable and long-overdue piece of legislation intended to fix some of the loopholes in my predecessors well intended but yet evolving and still flawed legislation around short-term rentals. with that, but he turned it over to supervisor campos >> supervisor campos: thank you. much mr. chairman. i want to thank yo

the peskin thank you. i'll give a moment for folks to clear out. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. alter the moment for folks to clear out.thank you. two weeks ago, nvidia item, yes, you did. two weeks ago we held a hearing on the status of the legacy business per gram and we heard from the director of the office of the economic and workforce development, todd with oh, as was his deputy director joachim torres, in the cities pledge director, ms. melissa whitehouse and i think them for their participation and we were very pleased that the announcement was made that same day at about $2.5 million would be allocated over the next two years to advance and administer the legacy business registry and program. we continued the hearing to today to allow for further updates regarding the status of the nominations. it was represented to us within a week of the hearing we would have a conference of list of those properties were businesses that were nominated and today we are joined by the director of the office of small business, regina dick-andrew c in or think oewd and marian thompson, in p

>> supervisor peskin: i the motion to send this to the board >> supervisor peskin: motion to the send this to the full board with a recommendation. without objection, that will be the order. >>[gavel] >> supervisor peskin: please read the next item >> clerk: item number three 81 examining the administrative codes require housing platform to residential unit is on the city registry prior to listing. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. we've been joined by the chief sponsor of this orbix david campos and i want to thank supervisor campos for his leadership on this issue as well as the coalition of housing advocates, homeowners, tenants, public safety advocates, hotel workers, the hotel council, the apartment association, the tenants union, for lending their support to this very reasonable and long-overdue piece of legislation intended to fix some of the loopholes in my predecessors well intended but yet evolving and still flawed legislation around short-term rentals. with that, but he turned it over to supervisor campos >> supervisor campos: thank you. much mr. chairman. i want to thank yo

thank you. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. mr. buhler because the fire >> testifier: good afternoon commissioners mike buhler san francisco heritage. i just want to report that we are helping things grow with her application thanks to supervisor peskin's nomination. i want to report says that hearing to easier we've heard from maryann thompson, and i spoke with her by phone and e-mail and she was helpful in telling us what is required so that's an encouraging time from our perspective. i did want to address some of the questions raised by supervisor yee earlier regarding who decides,, which intentional aspects of a business heritage should be protected and the application form is quite detailed and actually, asks applicants to self identify those aspects of the business with its menu items were traditions or whatever it might be, that they are committing to maintain going forward. but i should also note, the hpc for the last two years has had a cultural kurdish asset subcommittee which is specifically focused on intangible aspects

the peskin thank you. i'll give a moment for folks to clear out. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. alter the moment for folks to clear out.thank you. two weeks ago, nvidia item, yes, you did. two weeks ago we held a hearing on the status of the gacy business per gram and we heard from the director of the office of the economic and workforce development, todd with oh, as was his deputy director joachim torres, in the cities pledge director, ms. melissa whitehouse and i think them for their participation and we were very pleased that the announcement was made that same day at about $2.5 million would be allocated over the next two years to advance and administer the legacy business registry and program. we continued the hearing to today to allow for further updates regarding the status of the nominations. it was represented to us within a week of the hearing we would have a conference of list of those properties were businesses that were nominated and today we are joined by the director of the office of small business, regina dick-andrew c in or think oewd and marian thompson, in par

>> supervisor peskin: thank you, commissioner. >>[applause] >> supervisor peskin: commissioner moore anything like that animal go to public comment? >> commissioner moore: since commissioner richards took more than 2 min. oh make it simple get my position about this is quite clear. i'm in support of where you are and my simple comment would be without the ability to enforce the laws and we've come to that point. >> supervisor peskin: thanks. with that, we'll go to public comments. i will call sets of speakers in the water i received them. [calling names]. >> testifier: good morning. the real question is, why should be in the be allowed to lift unregistered units on the platform. the current system of enforcement that relies on neighborhoods to turn in neighbors. i'm the president of the coalition for san francisco neighborhoods. i often hear stories about things like this with air b&b. i think one thing to look at with the platform is first you are asking for an arbitrary number of $1000. i say, why not 10,000 , one not 50? they a

>> supervisor peskin: i the motion to send this to the board >> supervisor peskin: motion to the send this to the full board with a recommendation. without objection, that will be the order. >>[gavel] >> supervisor peskin: please read the next item >> clerk: item number three 81 examining the administrative codes require housing platform to residential unit is on the city registry prior to listing. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. we've been joined by the chief sponsor of this orbix david campos and i want to thank supervisor campos for his leadership on this issue as well as the coalition of housing advocates, homeowners, tenants, public safety advocates, hotel workers, the hotel council, the apartment association, the tenants union, for lending their support to this very reasonable and long-overdue piece of legislation intended to fix some of the loopholes in my predecessors well intended but yet evolving and still flawed legislation around short-term rentals. with that, but he turned it over to supervisor campos >> supervisor campos: thank you. much mr. chairman. i want to thank yo

the peskin thank you. i'll give a moment for folks to clear out. >> supervisor peskin: thank you. alter the moment for folks to clear out.thank you. two weeks ago, nvidia item, yes, you did. two weeks ago we held a hearing on the status of the legacy business per gram and we heard from the director of the office of the economic and workforce development, todd with oh, as was his deputy director joachim torres, in the cities pledge director, ms. melissa whitehouse and i think them for their participation and we were very pleased that the announcement was made that same day at about $2.5 million would be allocated over the next two years to advance and administer the legacy business registry and program. we continued the hearing to today to allow for further updates regarding the status of the nominations. it was represented to us within a week of the hearing we would have a conference of list of those properties were businesses that were nominated and today we are joined by the director of the office of small business, regina dick-andrew c in or think oewd and marian thompson, in p

. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, sir. next speaker, please. >> testifier: i get my name is henrietta kurier i apologize for my poor penmanship. my girlfriend complains about all the time. >> supervisor peskin: sorry for butchering yearning. >> testifier: no problem. i would like to support the legislation. i think it's a quite a no-brainer in these arguments about how air b&b is operating as a nice the engine on the subject to such regulation is just a bunch of who we. comparing, regulating short-term rentals with a newspaper taking out newspaper ads you can compare these think it's new world and old worlds. we need new approaches to make new world technology work in today's environment. the biggest problem, you for this over and over again-the short-term rentals are causing less housing. it trickles downhill in your seeing more homeless people. that's really the big problem. all these homeless people. so, yay for the legislation. it's a start and i look forward to seeing the next pieces of legislation to make registratio

. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, sir. next speaker, please. >> testifier: i am deeper, san francisco tenants union and i was canvassing in district 5 last weekend and i had the chance to speak of a bunch of folks on the street and everyone wanted to know how the cities going to regulate air b&b's and other candidates in that district are going to have a feel about your b&b and other correctly short-term rentals generally. they told me their concerns were what is happening in their neighborhood. i told him i'd see the same thing in my neighborhood in district 9. the neighbors are being replaced by forests. were experiencing is a community hollowing out and when that happens is not a community anymore. i do respect the need of six income folks lovely folks people that cannot use computers but i want to point out the number those people are tenants they have-the kind of burden that are tenants face and pushed out when there's increased pressures to find new housing are so much worse for the elderly for the fixed income for t

. >> supervisor peskin: thank you, sir. next speaker, please. >> testifier: i get my name is henrietta kurier i apologize for my poor penmanship. my girlfriend complains about all the time. >> supervisor peskin: sorry for butchering yearning. >> testifier: no problem. i would like to support the legislation. i think it's a quite a no-brainer in these arguments about how air b&b is operating as a nice the engine on the subject to such regulation is just a bunch of who we. comparing, regulating short-term rentals with a newspaper taking out newspaper ads you can compare these think it's new world and old worlds. we need new approaches to make new world technology work in today's environment. the biggest problem, you for this over and over again-the short-term rentals are causing less housing. it trickles downhill in your seeing more homeless people. that's really the big problem. all these homeless people. so, yay for the legislation. it's a start and i look forward to seeing the next pieces of legislation to make registratio

. >> supervisor peskin: thank you ms. malone. >>[applause] >> supervisor peskin: i want to it knowledge your bravery and leadership in appearing on the nbc bay area investigative units exposÉ on the abuses of short-term rental such as you experience. that was a i think, a helpful piece of public information and you did a public service in doing that. next speaker, please. >> testifier: jennifer-i think you know we are very supportive of this legislation already. i've even become friends with the apartment association staff while crafting this legislation. so, i think that is significant and shows the broad support we have. i know that air b&b set up an e-mail generator to expand and it was a very bizarre e-mail that said hosts would have to count all the forks in their houses and was no mention that this legislation is retargeted at the platforms themselves. it also didn't state the we know changes for current hosts. so if b&b continues to feed us lies and hide behind it hosts and this legislation will actually be good for the l

supervisor cowen chair of this committee to my right is supervisor wiener and my left is supervisor peskin our clerk is the crisis intervention lovely andrea ashbury and i like to recognize lee and phil jackson from sophisticating helping us by broadcasting this meanwhile madam clerk, any announcements? >> yes. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the april 16th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> item one a resolution authorizing the municipal transportation agency to that compete the application more affordable housing for sustainable communities program at eddy street and item 2 a resolution 30 years the crisis intervention municipal transportation agency to compete a grant for affordable housing as a sustainable community project ever project on bell. >> colleagues the sponsor of this item they've informed me additional requirements needed in order to finalize these recessess and applications and they have requested a continuance to the crisis intervention june 27th land use and

the peskin thank you supervisor campos. i know there's many individuals here there would like to testify. i got huge stack of speaker cards so we are going to limit testimony to 2 min. to that everybody will have a chance to testify. i also want to thank the office of short-term rental in the city administrator for offering the opportunity for anyone in this chamber coming this building today, might want to register. there is a table outside that is being staffed by li mei lu and anybody who would like to fill out an application to register a short-term rental can do so. out this door my right, your left, so feel free to avail yourself of that opportunity, if you wish to do so. with that, i want to start by acknowledging that we have two members of the planning commission here and would like to give them an opportunity to address this body. the planning commission actually did a very conference of review of the short-term rental regimen in san francisco and made a large list of recommendations, some of which the board talk

the next 10 to 20 years so even that is just a dent in the affordable housing supply need supervisor peskin mentioned the crisis intervention general plan amendment this amendment will authorize subsequent planning code amendments by making it clear there is a derivatives to do so it is simply through the meat of that saying that it is policy of the city to encourage greater levels of affordable on site and the city any adopt the crisis intervention permits height increases and building mass increases those will be needing to be revised this is to create more housing in general and more affordable housing in particular up to 5 thousand units and one of my programs we have that can produce some middle-income housing along with low to moderate housing quickly just so the audience what follow 3 slices of this program altogether one is on the crisis intervention left the crisis intervention state density bonus for providing depending on the rental ownership between 13 and 20 percent affordable they get a 35 density bonus and other incentives to determine if their needed and the local program we

supervisor peskin >> supervisor peskin: taking mdm. clerk. colleagues, i actually spoke to the legislation that supervisor mar just referenced last week so i will not speak about it again, but today i will speak to legislation that we are introducing, which will ban candidate control general-purpose committees in the city and county of san francisco. the general-purpose committees have been used to raise unlimited funds for unspecified measures, usually over a number of election cycles, and in essence, stylish uncontrolled funds for candidates were elected officers who control them. unlike candidate controlled ballot measure committees, which are stylish to support or oppose a specific proposition or initiative ordinance, general-purpose committees do not need to specify with the money being raised is going to be spent on. as a result, as far as i can tell, the primary incentive to donate to these committees is to create a special relationship between the donor and the elected official which is a recipe for undue influence if not legal corrup

supervisor peskin ? >> so madam president in conferring with our deputy city attorney i have some questions that i'd like to ask right now that i don't know that he's prepared to answer but to put this in larger procedural context this board has 90 days to act on a general plan amendment from the date that it is forwarded by the planning department and the planning commission to this body. the 90 days expires on july 6th. if the board does not act by that date the general plan amendment is deemed to be passed. if the board adopts it within that 90-day period it is adopted and if the board rejects it in that 90-day period it's deemed rejected so my question in so far as we don't have a full compliment of supervisors today if there's a five five tie, is it deemed approved or is it deemed not approved? >> deputy city attorney. i'm trying to get some consensus in my office. the charter on this states that the commission shall recommended that the board approve or reject and if the board fails to act within 9

supervisor peskin has made a motion to amend? second by supervisor peskin. colleagues, can we take that without objection? without objection the motion passes. the amendment passes >>[gavel] >> president breed: i just had a point of clarification, question, supervisor peskin. i apologize but i did not get a chance to talk to you about this before. but we in my district have a situation with a property that's under the former successor agency the redevelopment, which is appraised property but there's a high expectation of significant community benefits. that will be attached to this property. we are required under state law to dispose of the assets. yet, there is going to be a challenge to hold any property or future property owner accountable to providing a significant level of community benefits without attaching that somehow to a price negotiation and i want to understand how this legislation could impact a project of that nature. >> supervisor peskin: so, first of all, we have counsel here but i do not believe that our chapter 23 provisions apply to ocii,

supervisor peskin ? >> so madam president in conferring with our deputy city attorney i have some questions that i'd like to ask right now that i don't know that he's prepared to answer but to put this in larger procedural context this board has 90 days to act on a general plan amendment from the date that it is forwarded by the planning department and the planning commission to this body. the 90 days expires on july 6th. if the board does not act by that date the general plan amendment is deemed to be passed. if the board adopts it within that 90-day period it is adopted and if the board rejects it in that 90-day period it's deemed rejected so my question in so far as we don't have a full compliment of supervisors today if there's a five five tie, is it deemed approved or is it deemed not approved? >> deputy city attorney. i'm trying to get some consensus in my office. the charter on this states that the commission shall recommended that the board approve or reject and if the board fails to act within 9

supervisor peskin >> supervisor peskin: taking mdm. clerk. colleagues, i actually spoke to the legislation that supervisor mar just referenced last week so i will not speak about it again, but today i will speak to legislation that we are introducing, which will ban candidate control general-purpose committees in the city and county of san francisco. the general-purpose committees have been used to raise unlimited funds for unspecified measures, usually over a number of election cycles, and in essence, stylish uncontrolled funds for candidates were elected ficers who control them. unlike candidate controlled ballot measure committees, which are stylish to support or oppose a specific proposition or initiative ordinance, general-purpose committees do not need to specify with the money being raised is going to be spent on. as a result, as far as i can tell, the primary incentive to donate to these committees is to create a special relationship between the donor and the elected official which is a recipe for undue influence if not legal corrupti

peskin.: take a moment and thank phil jackson and jesse larson from sfgov tv will be broadcasting today's meeting. do we have any announcements >> yes. please silence sonic devices. any documents included for the file to be forwarded to the clerk. any items will be forwarded to the edge board of supervisors agenda >> thank you. item number one >> item number one >>[reading code] >> so, i am the sponsor of this item and the item before you is a zoning change for 1101 connecticut st. otherwise known as locke x which is part of the potrero hill all the ss site. the proposed zoning change will help accommodate the first phase of development and allow for on-site relocation of residents who currently live in the community and allow construction for start without demolition, excuse me without a motion existing units. it's incredibly important to ensure were not despising people during this construction period. there's revitalizing the rebuild the public housing has been a key priority for most of e

supervisor cowen chair of this committee to my right is supervisor wiener and my left is supervisor peskin our clerk is the crisis intervention lovely andrea ashbury and i like to recognize lee and phil jackson from sophisticating helping us by broadcasting this meanwhile madam clerk, any announcements? >> yes. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the april 16th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> item one a resolution authorizing the municipal transportation agency to that compete the application more affordable housing for sustainable communities program at eddy street and item 2 a resolution 30 years the crisis intervention municipal transportation agency to compete a grant for affordable housing as a sustainable community project ever project on bell. >> colleagues the sponsor of this item they've informed me additional requirements needed in order to finalize these recessess and applications and they have requested a continuance to the crisis intervention june 27th land use and

supervisor peskin ? >> so madam president in conferring with our deputy city attorney i have some questions that i'd like to ask right now that i don't know that he's prepared to answer but to put this in larger procedural context this board has 90 days to act on a general plan amendment from the date that it is forwarded by the planning department and the planning commission to this body. the 90 days expires on july 6th. if the board does not act by that date the general plan amendment is deemed to be passed. if the board adopts it within that 90-day period it is adopted and if the board rejects it in that 90-day period it's deemed rejected so my question in so far as we don't have a full compliment of supervisors today if there's a five five tie, is it deemed approved or is it deemed not approved? >> deputy city attorney. i'm trying to get some consensus in my office. the charter on this states that the commission shall recommended that the board approve or reject and if the board fails to act within 9

supervisor peskin, is there anything further? >> rather than reject item 19 i think we should go with staff's recommendation as was made before the committee amended in the non responsive bidder. >> okay. supervisor campos? >> thank you very much also to staff for the presentation. unless there's any evidence to the contemporary that disputes in fact that the chronicle was notified i think that we have to respect the process and i think that we should go back to the original recommendation from staff i think that if the process was gonna mean anything, people have to follow it and i think that a sophisticated player like the chronicle should be able to comply with the rules that were set out by the city. >> supervisor kim? >> thank you miss domingo we were both at the committee when the chronicle stated that they had not gotten the notice and i assume that to be the case. could you clarify oca's response to that statement? >> the standard oca practice is that when we put bids in solicitation out, we send outreach e-mails to all v

supervisor peskin >> supervisor peskin: taking mdm. clerk. colleagues, i actually spoke to the legislation that supervisor mar just referenced last week so i will not speak about it again, but today i will speak to legislation that we are introducing, which will ban candidate control general-purpose committees in the city and county of san francisco. the general-purpose committees have been used to raise unlimited funds for unspecified measures, usually over a number of election cycles, and in essence, stylish uncontrolled funds for candidates were elected officers who control them. unlike candidate controlled ballot measure committees, which are stylish to support or oppose a specific proposition or initiative ordinance, general-purpose committees do not need to specify with the money being raised is going to be spent on. as a result, as far as i can tell, the primary incentive to donate to these committees is to create a special relationship between the donor and the elected official which is a recipe for undue influence if not legal corrup

were joined by commissioner's london breed and aron peskin. i'll take a moment to thank those members of sfgov tv covering today's meeting. mr. clerk please call the for some >> item 1 rollcall. >>[roll call vote]. >> we have a quorum >> thank you very much. mr. clerk, called unexciting >> before we do that with a motion by commissioner avalos to excuse commissioner tang. she might be back in a little bit. she's at a conference outside of our building right now. so second by supervisor breed. we can take that without objection. >>[gavel] >> could you read the consent calendar >> neck item is item 2, consent citizens advisory committee report. >> good morning commissioners. there are four items i just want to briefly touch on today. item number six the k [inaudible] questions focus on great highway tree maintenance and second street project. on the great highway project any questions were deferred until this month meeting at which will have a broader explanation of what's going on with great highway project. second street ,, a lot of improvemen

supervisor peskin >> supervisor peskin: taking mdm. clerk. colleagues, i actually spoke to the legislation that supervisor mar just referenced last week so i will not speak about it again, but today i will speak to legislation that we are introducing, which will ban candidate control general-purpose committees in the city and county of san francisco. the general-purpose committees have been used to raise unlimited funds for unspecified measures, usually over a number of election cycles, and in essence, stylish uncontrolled funds for candidates were elected officers who control them. unlike candidate controlled ballot measure committees, which are stylish to support or oppose a specific proposition or initiative ordinance, general-purpose committees do not need to specify with the money being raised is going to be spent on. as a result, as far as i can tell, the primary incentive to donate to these committees is to create a special relationship between the donor and the elected official which is a recipe for undue influence if not legal corrup

supervisor peskin ? >> so madam president in conferring with our deputy city attorney i have some questions that i'd like to ask right now that i don't know that he's prepared to answer but to put this in larger procedural context this board has 90 days to act on a general plan amendment from the date that it is forwarded by the planning department and the planning commission to this body. the 90 days expires on july 6th. if the board does not act by that date the general plan amendment is deemed to be passed. if the board adopts it within that 90-day period it is adopted and if the board rejects it in that 90-day period it's deemed rejected so my question in so far as we don't have a full compliment of supervisors today if there's a five five tie, is it deemed approved or is it deemed not approved? >> deputy city attorney. i'm trying to get some consensus in my office. the charter on this states that the commission shall recommended that the board approve or reject and if the board fails to act within 9

millions of in communities support and many happy go healthy san franciscans i appreciate supervisor peskin that will grandfather this legislation but ask you to oppose this legislation and an extension made to all aspects of the proposed administrations thank you for your time i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> on impacts on business thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> >> i'm greg thank you for having me. i oppose this regulation to ban formula retail in my neighborhood i live on jackson which is directly kitty corner to the whole foods on 365 and very important to me and my neighbors we have good wholesome groceries this helps the elderly and people with disabilities and people that depends on public transit from our neighborhood and it makes the our neighborhood more liveable and more healthy so i'm opposed to anything that would ban the option of our neighborhood to choose what kind of retail in the community i'm supportive of the small businesses on polk street i love and support them and support them with my dollars we need formula retail that is r

thank you supervisor wiener and supervisor peskin let's go forward and open up for public comment at this time if you like to come up i have one card from corinne woods join us for 2 minutes at the podium. >> good afternoon chair cohen and supervisor wiener and supervisor peskin my name is corinne woods i chair the corinne woods chair of the san francisco redevelopment agency's mission bay citizens advisory committee and have been working very hard for a 4r07b9 with the community to get this park open and want to thank supervisor kim's office and the ocii staff and barbara mirrors infrastructure task force for pulling this altogether nothing in mission bay is simple there are 17 agencies that have to sign off on everything it is extremely frustrating as is every acceptance in anybody to watch hundreds of children looking at park from the outdoor i really appreciate your waving the waiting period on this and i don't quite understand supervisor peskin amendment does that mean 2 will wave the thirty day after enaction time and open by i up by the end of july i'm having a party you're in

supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar absent supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee madam chair we have quorum ladies and gentlemen, please join us for the pledge of allegiance and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> madam clerk any consumption. >> i have no communications today madam president. >> colleagues, any changes to the may 2016 board minutes seeing can i have a motion by supervisor campos seconded by supervisor mar colleagues without objection those meeting minutes will place after exceptional or extraordinary. >> items 1 through 7 comprise the are considered to be routine may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items cal's seeing no other names on the roster. >> on the consent calendar supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor presi

on a detail basis on the streets i want to say thank my colleagues supervisor mar and commissioner peskin and me that concurred that has religion to a level we need a citywide discussion on this matter lastly i want to raise we must continue to think outside the box when it comes to this measure of the mta and the transportation authority have been pushing on safety throughout the city we have all seen the diagrams if you are hit by a car traveling at 40 mile-per-hour only one out of pen pedestrians will survive but at 20 mile-per-hour 9 out of 10 pedestrians are likely to survive speed is absolutely essential lowering speed is essential inform our city reaching negotiation and speed is ten times the injuries in san francisco and driving under the influence it appears it unsafe 1350ed was an issue at the golden gate park and at fulsome and 7 and follow the direction of standardized like chicago and new york and really exam and hopefully at the sate level have enforcement cameras in i look forward to work with walk sf and with the bike coalition to have a safer city for everyone and i subm